Best Management Practices for Breeding Sows and Boars

A special issue of Animals (ISSN 2076-2615). This special issue belongs to the section "Animal Reproduction".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 February 2025 | Viewed by 300

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Clinic for Swine, Department for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Interests: theriogenology; pig reproduction; porcine health management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Departments of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
Interests: pig reproduction; endocrinology; porcine health management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The reproductive efficiency in pigs can be influenced by the association of the sow, the boar, and the environment. Therefore, the health status and the husbandry of breeding sows and boars are critical for physiological reproductive performance in the herd; they have a major impact on animal welfare, as well as on the economic output of a farm.

One of the most frequent reasons for culling a sow from a breeding farm is a reproductive disorder, during farrowing, the suckling period or at the insemination. Diseases of the urogenital tract in particular, such as endometritis and cystitis, and production diseases, such as post-partum dysgalactia syndrome, frequently occur on sow farms which differ within herd prevalence. Therefore, it is very important to recognize and treat these reproductive disorders as soon as possible to avoid negative effects on the subsequent reproductive cycle and performance of the sow. Furthermore, the boar has also an essential role in determining the reproductive efficiency in a breeding farm. Any reduction in fertility of boars can be caused by anatomical, metabolic or even psychological disorders that may also be influenced by the environment.

Hence, management practices for both sexes are necessary to improve reproductive performance, animal welfare and the economic output of a breeding farm. Therefore, this Special Issue aims to focus on the improvement in management practices for sows and boars to enhance herd’s reproduction of breeding farms.

Dr. Alexander Grahofer
Dr. Stefan Björkman
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Animals is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • theriogenology
  • pig reproduction
  • breeding sows
  • boars
  • endocrinology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers

This special issue is now open for submission, see below for planned papers.

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: Implementing a Tailored Diet from Mating to Weaning in Hyperprolific Multiparous Sows: Consequences for Litter Outcomes
Authors: Julia Cantin1, Carlos Cantin2, Olga Mitjana1,3*; Maria Teresa Tejedor 4, Carlos Gil Rubio5, Ana Maria Garrido 1, Maria Victoria Falceto1,3
Affiliation: 1Deparment of Animal Pathology, University of Zaragoza, Spain. 2 Independent consulting veterinarian, Zaragoza, Spain 3Agroalimentary Institute of Aragon-IA2, Department of Animal Pathology, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA 4Department of Anatomy, Embryology and Animal Genetics, CIBERV, University of Zaragoza. 5 Veterinary technical service Nutega, CCPA Group
Abstract: Our aim was to investigate the possible effect of a diet adapted to each phase of the reproductive cycle in hyperprolific sows on metabolic status, body condition, productivity, litter health, litter size and weight of piglets at birth and at weaning. A total of 60 gilts and 236 multiparous sows (Landrace x Largewhite) were randomly and equally assigned to control (C) and modified diet (T) groups. Group C was fed a commercial base feed for pregnant sows (weaning to 110 gestation day) followed by a commercial base feed for lactating sows (from 111 days of gestation to 28 days postpartum). Successively, group T was fed with four different compositions. Gestation 1 feed (service to 50 gestation day) increased both digestible arginine/lysine ratio (+28.03%) and digestive methionine (+24%). Gestation 2 feed (51 -110 gestation days) included both increased crude protein (+69.06%) and digestive lysine (+0.089%). Peripartum feed (111 gestation day to 3 postpartum day) incremented crude protein (+4.98%), lysine (+0.342%) and calcium (+0.1%), reduced both fat (-50%) and crude fibre (-1%) and incorporated a glycogenic precursor and beet pulp (8% minimum). Lactation feed (4 postpartum days to weaning) contained both increased lysine (+0.04%) and metabolizable energy ME (+50Kcal/kg); 5% full fat soya was added and electrolytes were balanced by 200 meq/kg. Gilts in group T on 113 gestation day significantly increased backfat thickness (EGD; p=0.003) and decreased blood beta-hydroxybutyrate concentration (BHB; p=0.004), incidences of neonatal diarrhoea (DN; p=0.023), postpartum hypophagia (HP; p=0.028), negative lactation curve (LC; p=0.001) and low birth weight piglets (<0.900 kg; p=0.035). Also, for these gilts EGD and BHB on 113 day of gestation was correlated (r= -0.647; p=0.002). Multiparous sows in group T had higher EGD (p=0.001), greater back muscle thickness (EMD) (p<0.001) and lower BHB on 113 day of gestation (p<0.001); greater EMD on 28 day of lactation (p<0.001); lower number of stillborn piglets (p=0.018), lower incidence of DN (p=0.044), lower incidence of HP (p=0.689); lower incidence of negative lactation curve (p=0.008) and higher piglet weights on both birth day (p=0.008) and 28 day of lactation (p<0.001). In group T on 113 day of gestation, significant correlations were found for EGD and ME (r= 0. 357; p=0. 001) and for EGD and BHB (r=-0.366; p<0.001); when correcting for EGD, correlation for ME and BHB was significant and negative (r=-0.378; p=0.001). Using a diet adapted to each phase of the production cycle would benefit the metabolic state and body condition for hyperprolific sows and the development of their offspring.

Back to TopTop