Current Laboratory Knowledge on Post-Mortem Diagnosis of Infections
A special issue of Forensic Sciences (ISSN 2673-6756).
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 March 2022) | Viewed by 730
Special Issue Editors
Interests: innovative (micro) extraction procedures (MEPS, FPSE, DLLME, SULLE, MAE, etc.) and hyphenated instrument configurations; bioactive compounds (drugs, drugs associations, and natural bioactive compounds); characterization, fingerprints, and method validation; HPLC; mass spectrometry (MS and MS/MS)
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Interests: medical professional liability; forensic dentistry; forensic pathology (in particular sudden deaths) and autoptic technique; histopathological and immunohistochemical sciences; forensic genetics; forensic toxicology; forensic pharmacology and applied analytical chemistry; study of inflammatory processes
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Interests: forensic toxicology; forensic pharmacology and applied analytical chemistry; histopathological and immunohistochemical sciences; forensic pathology; medical professional liability; study of post-mortem interval; study of inflammatory processes.
Interests: medical professional liability; forensic pathology; histopathological and immunohistochemical sciences; study of inflammatory processes; study of post-mortem interval
Special Issue Information
Dear Colleagues,
A Special Issue on the hot topic of "Current Laboratory Knowledge on Post-Mortem Diagnosis of Infections" is being prepared for the journals Life and Forensicsci.
Post-mortem diagnosis of infections is not always easy even if in the forensic practice, pathologists can use several methods, such as biochemical analysis of biological fluid (e.g., blood, urine, liquor) or extensive histological or immunohistochemical investigations on tissue samples collected during autopsies. Generally, these techniques and biomarkers may be used in clinical practice for diagnostic purposes, but for forensic purposes, the combination of biomarkers may not always discriminate non-infectious from infectious inflammation and related death. Additionally, with histological analyses, post-mortem diagnosis of infections may not be possible because macroscopic and microscopic findings, such as myocardial ischemia, pulmonary edema, or other signs of hypoxic damage, may be elusive or non-specific and may have an infectious or non-infectious origin. Currently, this topic has assumed more relevance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to better understand the phenomenology of death, especially in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Indeed, following an initial period of difficulty, the pandemic has led to a surge in post-mortem research. Techniques and biological samples available for COVID-19 infection diagnosis at post-mortem examination are the same as those used for diagnosis in life. Among these, nose and throat swabs or blood analysis for serology, with the contribution of histological and immunohistochemical analysis on tissue samples from the respiratory tract and additional samples (e.g., brain, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and any other tissue with macroscopically evident pathological involvement) could be applied. In this way, autopsy findings provide information on the cause of death and aim to establish whether a subject died from or with COVID-19 infection with implications on global health and for the pathophysiology of new infections. For these reasons, forensic research and applications need to be improved with new methods (e.g., proteomics applications) and new procedures that could be used in combination with well-known techniques.
This Special Issue aims to collect the state of the art on the main topics in the forensic field: techniques and instrument configurations, innovative sample treatment procedures, forensic analysis, legislative comments, nonconventional matrix analysis, and social situations. The aim is to produce a collection/commentary that can help even non-experts to understand the application potential of the innovations obtained in this area and, if necessary, apply and extend them to other fields. In order not to limit the types of publications and to provide a more detailed panorama of the topic, original papers, reviews, short communications, notes, commentaries, case studies, and application notes will be accepted. In particular, “case studies” can be a sort of short communication where the authors directly report a practical case where, perhaps, they have applied innovative approaches to solve the problem. “Legislative comments” refer to a series of articles where laboratory and forensic experts comment on the problems encountered in reconciling what the law requires with what can be done in the forensic laboratory, as well as suggesting possible meeting points.
You may choose our Joint Special Issue in Life.
Prof. Dr. Marcello Locatelli
Dr. Cristian D’Ovidio
Dr. Enrica Rosato
Dr. Martina Bonelli
Guest Editors
Keywords
- histological/immunohistochemical analyses
- proteomic evaluation
- molecular biology
- infection and SARS-CoV-2-related infections
- post-mortem diagnosis
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
- Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
- Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
- Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
- External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
- e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.
Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.