Limnological Review

Access to clean water remains a global challenge, particularly in areas where populations rely on surface water. These water sources must be treated. Coagulation with chemicals causes environmental problems and adverse effects on human health. Natural coagulants obtained from papaya (Carica papaya) waste are presented as an alternative that is safe for human health, non-polluting, and biodegradable. The effectiveness of these natural coagulants is compared to that of aluminum sulfate using jar tests and synthetic and natural surface water, with statistical tools to model treatment processes. All coagulants have competitive results, reaching turbidity remotion levels above 90%. However, in equivalent tested ranges, natural coagulants require lower dosages and perform better with high initial water turbidity due to their polymeric bridging mechanisms and adsorption processes through the action of their functional groups, as detected by FTIR analysis. Additional testing with contaminated water from the Valsequillo dam confirms the use of these coagulants to treat water, with papaya seed coagulant yielding the best results and requiring lower doses, making it a competitive alternative. It can be concluded that papaya-based coagulants obtained from waste can be used as an eco-friendly alternative to aluminum sulfate in physicochemical treatments to purify surface water for human consumption.

Most studies on microplastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems have focused on the quantitative and qualitative assessment of particles in surface waters. However, the highest concentrations and accumulation of microplastic particles are observed in bottom sediments. The aim of this study was to determine the concentrations of microplastic particles of different morphology in sediments in the beach and littoral zones of Lake Baikal. This study is the first in relation to Lake Baikal to focus specifically on the analysis of microplastic particles in bottom sediments. The results of the study showed that the registered values of concentration of microplastic particles do not exceed the average values for lakes around the world. The predominant type of particles in both the littoral zone and the beach is microplastic fibers. An exception is observed only for one of the locations. This exception is related to the permanent mooring of vessels in this place. Analysis of the types of artificial polymers showed that the microplastic fibers were represented by polyester, and the fragments were represented by alkyd resin (66%), polyvinyl alcohol (32%) and polyvinyl chloride (2%). Shown for the first time in this study, the presence of large numbers of microplastic particles with rare types of artificial polymers suggests that these particles may be under-reported in other studies. The underestimation of particles may be due either to the selection of sampling locations located far from heavily contaminated areas, or to the fragility of these polymers. Although the harm of these types of polymers has not yet been confirmed, the large number of these particles in local areas of lakes should be taken into account. This is due to the large number of organisms, which is usually characteristic of littoral areas, including Lake Baikal, with its diversity of fauna and flora.

Different sampling techniques were evaluated to assess potential differences in species richness and the abundances of phytoplankton across several lowland aquatic environments. Five sampling methods were used, including a bucket, narrow- and wide-mouth bottles, a 10 µm plankton net, and a vertical Van Dorn bottle. These sampling methods were applied in subtropical streams, shallow lakes, and rivers. The results were compared using a two-way ANOVA to evaluate differences in total density by considering the morphological group and major phytoplankton phyla. Similarity analyses (SIMPER) and a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) were performed to compare the relative abundances of the species. The results showed, in general (except with Cyanophyta, Chrysophyta, and colonies—coenobia), significant differences in the effect of the sampling method but without interaction with the kind of environment. Particularly, the plankton net always reported lower density estimations, with the bucket having the highest values and the wide–narrow bottle methods having similar values. SIMPER and PERMANOVA indicated differences, especially with the plankton net and the other methods, particularly the bucket. These findings suggest that the sampling method can influence species counts and registration in subtropical water ecosystems, highlighting the need for standardized procedures across countries to obtain comparable and reliable results.