Intricacies of Child–Robot Interaction - 2nd Edition

A special issue of Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (ISSN 2414-4088).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2023) | Viewed by 4567

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Social and Intelligent Robotics Research laboratory, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Interests: social robots; assistive robotics; educational robotics; long-term human-robot interaction; autonomous robots; interaction design; artificial Intelligence; machine learning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
GAIPS (Group of AI for People and Society) at INESC-ID (Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Lisboa), 2780-990 Porto Salvo, Portugal
Interests: cognitive psychology; experimental psychology; human-robot interaction; human-computer interaction; memory and cognitive load

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent decades, there has been an upsurge in interest around child–robot interactions (CRI). The possibilities of using social robots for educational or therapeutic purposes in schools, hospitals, and domestic settings have captured the attention of researchers, institutions, and stakeholders alike. Much of the existing research seems to confirm the positive potential of using social robots: for example, robots as tutors or learning companions are seen as engaging devices to foster learning, able to alleviate some of the teacher’s workload; neurodiverse children are thought to benefit from social training with robots; children in need of remote education can benefit from utilizing telepresent robots for interacting with their peers in classrooms.

In recent years, however, doubts have been raised that emphasize the need for critical and ethical perspectives on the study and use of social robots for children. The trajectory of technological change is never straightforward. While the potentials for CRI are high, so are the stakes. Like many other technologies targeting children, we are still unsure about the long-term effects of CRI on children’s mental, physical, and emotional wellbeing and development. Through our years of experience in this field, we know that researchers confront several difficulties, challenges, and dilemmas in trying to make the interaction between children and robots work successfully. With this Special Issue, we aim to focus on the challenges of CRI that are widely known—but seldom reported—within the research field. These obstacles belong to a wide range of topics, including technical, social, behavioral, user perceptions and expectations, evaluation, qualitative/quantitative data, and ethical issues, among others. 

We are pleased to invite you to contribute to this Special Issue on “Intricacies in Child–Robot Interaction II”, in response to what we perceive as a lack of studies in CRI that specifically focus on the challenges and intricacies. Authors are encouraged to submit original research articles, case studies, reviews, position papers, and theoretical papers within the following topics of interest:

  • Challenges in CRI, e.g., design challenges, conducting long-term studies, or designing playful scenarios;
  • Critical examinations of children’s or relevant stakeholders’ perceptions and expectations of robots;
  • Breakdowns, errors, and/or deficits in CRI, both technical and social, intended and unintended;
  • Qualitative studies of cases/children in previously published CRI experiments, excluded from analysis due to robot malfunction or interaction breakdowns;
  • Ethics in CRI;
  • Studies of CRI that are never published due to “insignificant or negative results”;
  • Critical examinations of dominating methods or theories in CRI, and/or proposed methods or theories;
  • Robot designs or applications that were for some reason abandoned as feasible options for CRI;
  • Negative and/or undesirable effects of robots for children;
  • Social and practical challenges of implementing robots in child-focused settings (e.g., classrooms, hospitals, or the home);
  • Cultural challenges in CRI;
  • Critical perspectives on social robots in relation to neurodiverse children, e.g., therapeutic applications for children on the autism spectrum;
  • Researcher responsibility in CR.

Dr. Shruti Chandra
Dr. Marta Couto
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 1368 KiB  
Article
“A Safe Space for Sharing Feelings”: Perspectives of Children with Lived Experiences of Anxiety on Social Robots
by Jill A. Dosso, Jaya N. Kailley, Susanna E. Martin and Julie M. Robillard
Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2023, 7(12), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7120118 - 15 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2163
Abstract
Social robots have the potential to support health and quality of life for children experiencing anxiety. We engaged families with lived experiences of pediatric anxiety in social robot development to explore desired design features, application areas, and emotion functionalities of social robots in [...] Read more.
Social robots have the potential to support health and quality of life for children experiencing anxiety. We engaged families with lived experiences of pediatric anxiety in social robot development to explore desired design features, application areas, and emotion functionalities of social robots in anxiety care. We conducted 10 online co-creation workshops with (1) children with anxiety aged 7–13 (n = 24) with their family members (n = 20), and (2) youth with anxiety aged 14–18 (n = 12). Workshop participation included a validated robot expectations scale, anonymous polls, and discussion. Transcripts and text responses were subjected to content analysis. A lived experience expert group provided feedback throughout the research. Participants desired a pet-like robot with a soft texture, expressive eyes, and emotion detection to support activities of daily living. Specific anxiety-related applications included breathing exercises, managing distressing thoughts, and encouragement. Emotional alignment, the design of a robot’s emotional display, and the emotional impacts of an interaction were discussed. Privacy and the replacement of human interaction were concerns. We identify pediatric anxiety-specific design features, applications, and affective considerations for existing and future social robots. Our findings highlight the need for customizability and robust emotional functionality in social robot technologies intended to support the health and care of children living with anxiety. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intricacies of Child–Robot Interaction - 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 9716 KiB  
Article
Can You Dance? A Study of Child–Robot Interaction and Emotional Response Using the NAO Robot
by Vid Podpečan
Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2023, 7(9), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7090085 - 30 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1838
Abstract
This retrospective study presents and summarizes our long-term efforts in the popularization of robotics, engineering, and artificial intelligence (STEM) using the NAO humanoid robot. By a conservative estimate, over a span of 8 years, we engaged at least a couple of thousand participants: [...] Read more.
This retrospective study presents and summarizes our long-term efforts in the popularization of robotics, engineering, and artificial intelligence (STEM) using the NAO humanoid robot. By a conservative estimate, over a span of 8 years, we engaged at least a couple of thousand participants: approximately 70% were preschool children, 15% were elementary school students, and 15% were teenagers and adults. We describe several robot applications that were developed specifically for this task and assess their qualitative performance outside a controlled research setting, catering to various demographics, including those with special needs (ASD, ADHD). Five groups of applications are presented: (1) motor development activities and games, (2) children’s games, (3) theatrical performances, (4) artificial intelligence applications, and (5) data harvesting applications. Different cases of human–robot interactions are considered and evaluated according to our experience, and we discuss their weak points and potential improvements. We examine the response of the audience when confronted with a humanoid robot featuring intelligent behavior, such as conversational intelligence and emotion recognition. We consider the importance of the robot’s physical appearance, the emotional dynamics of human–robot engagement across age groups, the relevance of non-verbal cues, and analyze drawings crafted by preschool children both before and after their interaction with the NAO robot. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intricacies of Child–Robot Interaction - 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop