Emergencies, Disasters and Catastrophes: Perspectives from Ethics and Political Philosophy

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 March 2024) | Viewed by 10730

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, University of Oviedo, 33011 Oviedo, Spain
Interests: political philosophy; political ethics; bioethics and disaster ethics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue seeks to both deepen and complicate our understanding of disasters, broadly defined, and their moral and political significance. We assume, at the outset, that mass emergencies, disasters, and catastrophes are highly complex phenomena with multiple dimensions of analysis. Likewise, effective disaster management efforts and so-called disaster risk reduction require coordinated responses and both multi-agency and cross-sectoral approaches. Disaster studies thus attract and bring together a wide range of disciplines, including many from fields in the social sciences and humanities. Mass emergencies, disasters, and catastrophes are of course receiving increasing attention in many philosophical disciplines, such metaphysics, aesthetics, philosophy of history, philosophy of culture, and so on. In a sense, the meaning and implications of disasters and catastrophes have long been reflected upon in ethics and political philosophy. Even if we confine ourselves to the Western philosophical canon, we find decisive philosophical–political discussions from Plato, through Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, to Carl Schmitt, Judith Shklar, some Rawlsian contractualists, and contemporary post-foundational thinkers. Think also of the catastrophic scenarios in thought experiments that have fueled outstanding ethical debates framed by major ethical theories. The contemporary landscape offers us impressive contributions of ethical and political–philosophical reflections on mass emergencies, disasters, and catastrophes in connection to a variety of research areas, including, but not exhausted by, those of collective human agency; science, technology, and society studies; the analyses and assessment of hazards and risks; the recent debates on Anthropocene, collapsology, and degrowth, etc. Of particular importance are the approaches to emergencies and disaster situations deriving from bioethics, public health ethics, and different applied ethics, such as environmental ethics, various professional ethics, and last, but not least, the emerging, hybrid discipline of disaster ethics.

We are pleased to invite you to contribute to this Special Issue of Philosophies focused on moral and philosophical–political views on mass emergencies, disasters, and catastrophes. The aim is to explore and show the fertility of this kind of research and to arrive at a better understanding of these phenomena through contributions from a variety of perspectives.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Potential contributors are invited to submit papers on any aspect of the ethics and political philosophy of disasters, broadly construed, including, though not limited to, the research areas mentioned above and the following topics: varieties of catastrophism in democratic societies; concerns about the instrumental justificatory arguments for democracy based on disaster and catastrophe preparedness and response; the threats and challenges of short-termism, citizen myopia, and reactive decision making; issues surrounding existential risks; the moral and political arguments on disasters from effective altruism and long-termism; disasters through the lens of intergenerational justice; the feasibility of the disaster justice approach; the concepts of vulnerability in disasters as well as in disaster research and disaster risk reduction; discussions on social resilience and anti-fragility; the political and moral issues of risks in view of limited knowledge and ineradicable uncertainty; technological solutionism and the tragic structure of disasters; the ethical duties and conflicts that typically arise in the different and overlapping phases of the entire disaster cycle; the responsibilities and obligations of disaster preparedness; the duty to cooperate on a multi-level and cross-sectoral scale; morally guided triage systems in mass casualty incidents and disasters; issues of resource allocation and rationing in disaster preparedness and in disaster response; debates around the rule of rescue, the humanitarian imperative, and duties of care and assistance; questions of the ethics of disaster research; the attribution of causal and moral responsibilities for the outcomes of disasters; the allocation of prospective and retrospective shared responsibilities for disasters; issues surrounding moral dilemmas and value conflicts in disaster settings; and burnout and moral distress in emergency and disaster professionals, particularly in healthcare and humanitarian workers.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200–500 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editor ([email protected]) or to the Philosophies editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editor for the purposes of ensuring a proper fit within the scope of this Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer-review process.

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Francisco Javier Gil Martín
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

17 pages, 277 KiB  
Article
Epistemic Injustices in Disaster Theory and Management
by Alicia García Álvarez
Philosophies 2024, 9(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9040095 - 29 Jun 2024
Viewed by 703
Abstract
The present paper argues that the standardised treatment of disaster research and practice perpetuates the production of systematic epistemic injustices against victims of disasters. On the one hand, disaster victims are often prevented from contributing with their opinions and knowledge to the processes [...] Read more.
The present paper argues that the standardised treatment of disaster research and practice perpetuates the production of systematic epistemic injustices against victims of disasters. On the one hand, disaster victims are often prevented from contributing with their opinions and knowledge to the processes of disaster mitigation and disaster conceptualisation. On the other hand, disaster victims tend to lack the hermeneutical resources to make sense of their experiences intelligibly, due to the existence of significant hermeneutical gaps in the hegemonic terminology on the matter. I argue that both forms of epistemic injustice, the testimonial and the hermeneutical, are sustained by an epistemic privilege between the Global North and the Global South in matters of disasters. The second group comprises what I categorise generally as ‘disaster victims’. I identify two forms of structural prejudice that operate against disaster victims: one is the ‘non-expert’ prejudice, and the other is the colonial prejudice. Finally, because of the intercultural nature of disaster environments, I discuss the field of ‘multicultural competencies’ as a useful form of unveiling and counteracting the epistemic injustices contained in both disaster theory and practice. Full article
14 pages, 503 KiB  
Article
Researching Gender and Disasters of Natural Origin: Ethical Challenges
by Sandra Dema Moreno, María Teresa Alonso Moro and Virginia Cocina Díaz
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030070 - 17 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1273
Abstract
Ethical issues are very relevant in the field of women’s, gender and/or feminist studies. The aim of this article is to highlight the ethical challenges faced by the authors in their research process, with specific reference to two projects on gender and disasters [...] Read more.
Ethical issues are very relevant in the field of women’s, gender and/or feminist studies. The aim of this article is to highlight the ethical challenges faced by the authors in their research process, with specific reference to two projects on gender and disasters in which they have been involved. In general, we try to avoid sexist bias throughout the complete research process, from the definition of the objectives themselves to the methodology design, where we ensure diversity in the selection of participants in order to take into consideration the variety of voices present in society, especially those of women. Also, when developing our research, we take into account the power relationships involved, both between those who participate in the fieldwork and with the researchers themselves. To counteract the effects of such relations, we have considered people’s wellbeing and the humanization of the whole process. Finally, when it comes to the dissemination of the results and their transfer to society at large, we follow the same principles and actively integrate the people involved. Considering these issues benefits the research process and makes the resultant knowledge more ethical and socially useful, in addition to promoting more egalitarian gender relations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 271 KiB  
Article
Intercultural and Deliberative Disaster Ethics in Volcanic Eruptions
by Noelia Bueno Gómez and Salvador Beato Bergua
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030069 - 16 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 985
Abstract
The objectives of this article are (i) to identify the most challenging ethical dilemmas and questions arising from the experiences of communities and professionals affected by or involved in volcanic eruptions, including risk management, the dissemination of information, and tourism; and (ii) to [...] Read more.
The objectives of this article are (i) to identify the most challenging ethical dilemmas and questions arising from the experiences of communities and professionals affected by or involved in volcanic eruptions, including risk management, the dissemination of information, and tourism; and (ii) to provide arguments for intercultural ethics to address these dilemmas. Intercultural ethics provide invaluable resources to disaster ethics across all three phases of the complete disaster management cycle. In this article, intercultural ethics is viewed as an ethics grounded in ongoing dialogue, facilitating the examination and establishment of norms and a critical reflection on values and their evolution. This approach recognizes power dynamics that may influence fair participation in dialogues and aims to address them, while also integrating elements of deliberative ethics to ensure that dialogues genuinely contribute to legitimizing decisions. Intercultural sensibility helps bridge the gap between experts and non-experts in both directions (a) by emphasizing the duty of transferring scientific knowledge (for experts) and the responsibility of acquiring scientific literacy (for citizens); and (b) by highlighting the importance of a ‘knowledge dialogue’ that acknowledges the non-scientific knowledge of citizens, rooted in their cultural background and experiences of dealing with past disasters, and shaping life in volcanic territories. Full article
9 pages, 254 KiB  
Article
The Ethics of Care in Disaster Contexts from a Gender and Intersectional Perspective
by Rosario González-Arias, María Aránzazu Fernández-Rodríguez and Ana Gabriela Fernández-Saavedra
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030064 - 6 May 2024
Viewed by 1769
Abstract
Feminist reflections on the sexual division of labour have given rise to a body of knowledge on the ethics of care from different disciplines, including philosophy, in which outstanding contributions to the topic have been formulated. This approach is applicable to the analysis [...] Read more.
Feminist reflections on the sexual division of labour have given rise to a body of knowledge on the ethics of care from different disciplines, including philosophy, in which outstanding contributions to the topic have been formulated. This approach is applicable to the analysis of any phenomenon and particularly that of disasters. As various investigations have highlighted, the consequences on the population throughout all of a disaster’s phases (prevention, emergency, and reconstruction) require an analysis of differentiated vulnerabilities based on gender and other identity categories, such as social class, ethnicity, age, disability, sexual identity, etc. The interrelation between all these variables gives rise to differentiated impacts that cannot be ignored in catastrophic contexts, where survival and sustaining life are at stake, so care becomes a central issue. Research on the topic has also identified that, along with the analysis of social vulnerability, we must consider the capacity for agency, both individual and collective, where care is once again of vital importance. Considering the gender approach and its multiple intersections is thus a fundamental theoretical-practical proposal for the study of disasters from philosophy, as it implies an unavoidable epistemic, ontological, and ethical reflection in the face of risk reduction. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 240 KiB  
Essay
Conflicts and Proposals for an Antispeciesist Ecofeminist Consideration of Nonhuman Animals in Disaster Contexts
by Amanda Briones Marrero
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030067 - 12 May 2024
Viewed by 1092
Abstract
This essay aims to defend the need to help animals in any disaster situation, be it anthropogenic, natural, or hybrid. To this end, I will first establish a brief foundation of the antispeciesist principles that have been advocated by different theorists over the [...] Read more.
This essay aims to defend the need to help animals in any disaster situation, be it anthropogenic, natural, or hybrid. To this end, I will first establish a brief foundation of the antispeciesist principles that have been advocated by different theorists over the last decades. Then, I will describe the conflict between environmental and animal approaches as a problem for the consideration of animals in unfavorable situations. This will be followed by the ways in which animals can be harmed in such contexts. After that, I will argue that many anthropogenic disasters affect animals, but they also deserve aid in the face of natural disasters: they are sentient beings and capable of suffering just like humans, to whom help is offered unconditionally in such cases. Finally, I will propose sentience, particularly suffering, and an ecofeminist and antispeciesist approach to address the situation of animals in disaster situations in a dialogic way between environmentalist and individual-centered positions. Full article
10 pages, 542 KiB  
Perspective
The Evolution of Humanitarian Aid in Disasters: Ethical Implications and Future Challenges
by Pedro Arcos González and Rick Kye Gan
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030062 - 1 May 2024
Viewed by 2991
Abstract
Ethical dilemmas affect several essential elements of humanitarian aid, such as the adequate selection of crises to which to provide aid and a selection of beneficiaries based on needs and not political or geostrategic criteria. Other challenges encompass maintaining neutrality against aggressors, deciding [...] Read more.
Ethical dilemmas affect several essential elements of humanitarian aid, such as the adequate selection of crises to which to provide aid and a selection of beneficiaries based on needs and not political or geostrategic criteria. Other challenges encompass maintaining neutrality against aggressors, deciding whether to collaborate with governments that violate human rights, and managing the allocation and prioritization of limited resources. Additionally, issues arise concerning the safety and protection of aid recipients, the need for cultural and political sensitivity, and recognition of the importance of local knowledge, skills, and capacity. The appropriateness, sustainability, and long-term impact of actions; security risks for aid personnel; and the need for transparency and accountability are also crucial. Furthermore, humanitarian workers face the duty to report and engage in civil activism in response to human rights violations and the erosion of respect for international humanitarian law. Lastly, the rights of affected groups and local communities in the decision-making and implementation of humanitarian aid are vital. The traditional foundations and approaches of humanitarian aid appear insufficient in today’s landscape of disasters and crises, which are increasingly complex and divergent, marked by a diminished capacity and shifting roles of various actors in alleviating suffering. This article reviews the historical evolution of the conceptualization of humanitarian aid and addresses some of its ethical challenges and dilemmas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop