Contemporary Studies on Virtue Ethics: Law, Lawfulness, and Virtue

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287). This special issue belongs to the section "Virtues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 November 2021) | Viewed by 8968

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Busch School of Business, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064, USA
Interests: classical ethics (Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Stoics); Thomistic ethics; natural law; the philosophy of John Henry Newman

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Papers are solicited for a special issue on virtue ethics, with emphasis on studies that relate virtue and law (or lawfulness). Although papers on any topic in virtue ethics are welcome, priority will be given to those that deal with law. Papers are welcome both in the history of philosophy (any period) and in contemporary moral and social philosophy. Integrative and interdisciplinary studies, which attempt to link, compare, or apply views from disciplines other than philosophy, to philosophical questions, are especially welcome: for example, behavioral economics; psychology; sociology; neuroscience; education; family studies; management theory; and of course jurisprudence. Potential topics relating virtue to law include but are not limited to: Is virtue in members of an association properly conceived of as in the service of the law and its purposes, or is the law of that association for the sake of the virtue of its members? What role does virtue play in the intelligent application of law (cf. phronesis, epieikeia)? To what extent does a virtue imply or include commitment to lawlike precepts? Is the difference between ‘ethics’ and ‘compliance’ in regulatory contexts (including moderation of market activity) a difference somehow in the presence, activity, or acknowledgement of virtue? Is virtue more closely related to informal bonds of friendship and trust than legal bonds involving obligation and penalty?  Are there virtues of groups, and, if so, how are these characterized by law? Is lawfulness itself a virtue, or is it perhaps even the whole of virtue under a certain respect (cf. Aristotle)? Is the doctrine of natural law connected to the doctrine of the naturalness of virtue? Are structural or systemic injustices more a matter of vice or bad law?  How is law conceived in a culture in which sentiment rather than virtue is regarded as crucial to “morals” and character? How are evils in a society (e.g. greed, bigotry), differently addressed in a society in which those evils are regarded as vices, contrary to virtues? What makes it seem as if virtues are not important for a society of “free and equal persons”?—And so on.

Prof. Michael Pakaluk
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • virtue ethics
  • classical ethics
  • law and morality
  • lawfulness
  • social justice

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 9514 KiB  
Article
Aristotle’s Political Justice and the Golden Ratio between the Three Opposing Criteria for the Distribution of Public Goods among Citizens: Freedom, Wealth and Virtue
by Maria Antonietta Salamone
Philosophies 2021, 6(4), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6040096 - 27 Nov 2021
Viewed by 8045
Abstract
In this article, I interpret Book V of the Nicomachean Ethics in which Aristotle presents a geometrical problem to explain which is the Best Criterion for the Distribution of Political and Economic Rights and Duties among Citizens, starting from the empirical evidence that [...] Read more.
In this article, I interpret Book V of the Nicomachean Ethics in which Aristotle presents a geometrical problem to explain which is the Best Criterion for the Distribution of Political and Economic Rights and Duties among Citizens, starting from the empirical evidence that there are three opposing opinions on which is the fairest distribution criterion: for some it is Freedom (Democrats), for others Wealth (Oligarchs), and for others Virtue (Aristocrats). Against the almost unique and most quoted interpretation of the geometrical problem, I present my mathematical solution, which I arrived at thanks to the Doctrine of the Four Causes and the Theory of the Mean. My thesis is that the Mean Term of Distributive Justice is the Golden Ratio between the opposite criteria of distribution, and the unjust distribution is the one that violates this ratio. This solution allows us to understand what is the Rational Principle at the basis of just distribution: that is, Geometrical Equality as opposed to Arithmetical Equality. Indeed, by applying the geometric figure of the Golden Triangle to the different political constitutions, I show, in line with Politics, that the Best Form of Government is the Aristocratic Politeia, i.e., a mixture of Democracy, Oligarchy and Aristocracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contemporary Studies on Virtue Ethics: Law, Lawfulness, and Virtue)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop