sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

New Technologies and Data Analysis Methods for Seismic Monitoring

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Remote Sensors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 July 2021) | Viewed by 8094

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Swiss Seismological Service, ETH-Zurich, Sonnegstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Interests: waveform-based seismological techniques; induced seismicity; microseismic monitoring; earthquake source characterization; real-time seismology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Interests: waveform-based seismological techniques; induced seismicity; microseismic monitoring; earthquake source characterization; volcano seismology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institut de physique du globe de Paris (IPGP), 1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris cedex 05, France
Interests: waveform-based seismological techniques; earthquake source characterization; microearthquake seismology; seismotectonics; real-time seismology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since the last decade, seismology has been characterized by an exponential growth of data, mainly due to the increasing number of high-quality seismic networks being installed around the world; these numbers will probably continue to increase in the coming decades. As a consequence, seismological data are growing in size and variety at an exceptionally fast rate, and this data explosion is opening a new era for this field of research. Modern microseismic networks based on new sensor technologies (such as hyper-dense surface arrays composed by thousands of low-cost seismometers, ultra-sensitive MEMS-based and interferometric accelerometers that can be deployed in boreholes, and distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) based on fiber optics technology) allow detecting a massive number of tiny earthquakes, generating an extremely large dataset for analysis. The analysis of such a huge amount of data, hundreds of times larger than those available today, highlights the limits of standard routines for seismic analysis, which are generally performed in a manual or semi-automated fashion. Exploiting these new massive datasets is a challenge that can be overcome only by using new-generation, automated, and noise-robust data analysis methods. In this context, the advent of fast graphics processing units (GPUs) has significantly increased our computational capability and now made it possible to apply innovative processing workflows, enabling to move away from standard manual or semi-automated seismic processing toward much more consistent and fully automated data analysis schemes.

In recent years, waveform-based detection and location methods have grown in popularity, and their application has dramatically improved seismic monitoring capability. Moreover, machine learning approaches to data-intensive seismic analysis are showing promising results, opening new horizons for the development of innovative, fully automated, and noise-robust methods. Such techniques are particularly useful when working with data sets characterized by large numbers of weak events with low signal-to-noise ratio, such as those collected in induced seismicity, seismic swarms, and volcanic monitoring operations.

This Special Issue aims to highlight advances in the development of new monitoring technologies and data analysis methods that can be applied to large seismic datasets and used to characterize seismicity (i.e., perform detection, location, magnitude, and source mechanism estimation) at different scales and in different environments. We encourage methodological contributions as well as key applications, which demonstrate how these new technologies and/or methods help to improve our understanding of the physical processes governing earthquake and/or volcanic phenomena.

Dr. Francesco Grigoli
Dr. Simone Cesca
Dr. Claudio Satriano
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Earthquake detection and location
  • Seismicity characterization
  • Seismic sensors
  • Microseismic monitoring
  • Satellite sensors
  • Induced seismicity
  • Volcano seismicity
  • Machine learning
  • Synthetic aperture radar (SAR)

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 5702 KiB  
Article
Multi-Classification of Complex Microseismic Waveforms Using Convolutional Neural Network: A Case Study in Tunnel Engineering
by Hang Zhang, Jun Zeng, Chunchi Ma, Tianbin Li, Yelin Deng and Tao Song
Sensors 2021, 21(20), 6762; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206762 - 12 Oct 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1682
Abstract
Due to the complexity of the various waveforms of microseismic data, there are high requirements on the automatic multi-classification of such data; an accurate classification is conducive for further signal processing and stability analysis of surrounding rock masses. In this study, a microseismic [...] Read more.
Due to the complexity of the various waveforms of microseismic data, there are high requirements on the automatic multi-classification of such data; an accurate classification is conducive for further signal processing and stability analysis of surrounding rock masses. In this study, a microseismic multi-classification (MMC) model is proposed based on the short time Fourier transform (STFT) technology and convolutional neural network (CNN). The real and imaginary parts of the coefficients of microseismic data are inputted to the proposed model to generate three classes of targets. Compared with existing methods, the MMC has an optimal performance in multi-classification of microseismic data in terms of Precision, Recall, and F1-score, even when the waveform of a microseismic signal is similar to that of some special noise. Moreover, semisynthetic data constructed by clean microseismic data and noise are used to prove the low sensitivity of the MMC to noise. Microseismic data recorded under different geological conditions are also tested to prove the generality of the model, and a microseismic signal with Mw ≥ 0.2 can be detected with a high accuracy. The proposed method has great potential to be extended to the study of exploration seismology and earthquakes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Technologies and Data Analysis Methods for Seismic Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4232 KiB  
Article
Middle-Scale Ionospheric Disturbances Observed by the Oblique-Incidence Ionosonde Detection Network in North China after the 2011 Tohoku Tsunamigenic Earthquake
by Jin Wang, Gang Chen, Tao Yu, Zhongxin Deng, Xiangxiang Yan and Na Yang
Sensors 2021, 21(3), 1000; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21031000 - 2 Feb 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2161
Abstract
The 2011 Tohoku earthquake and the following enormous tsunami caused great disturbances in the ionosphere that were observed in various regions along the Pacific Ocean. In this study, the oblique-incidence ionosonde detection network located in North China was applied to investigate the inland [...] Read more.
The 2011 Tohoku earthquake and the following enormous tsunami caused great disturbances in the ionosphere that were observed in various regions along the Pacific Ocean. In this study, the oblique-incidence ionosonde detection network located in North China was applied to investigate the inland ionospheric disturbances related to the 2011 tsunamigenic earthquake. The ionosonde network consists of five transmitters and 20 receivers and can monitor regional ionosphere disturbances continuously and effectively. Based on the recorded electron density variations along the horizontal plane, the planar middle-scale ionospheric disturbances (MSTIDs) associated with the 2011 Tohoku tsunamigenic earthquake were detected more than 2000 km west of the epicenter about six hours later. The MSTIDs captured by the Digisonde, high-frequency (HF) Doppler measurement, and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) satellite provided more information about the far-field inland propagation characteristics of the westward propagating gravity waves. The results imply that the ionosonde network has the potential for remote sensing of ionospheric disturbances induced by tsunamigenic earthquakes and provide a perspective for investigating the propagation process of associated gravity waves. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Technologies and Data Analysis Methods for Seismic Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3038 KiB  
Article
Real-Time Production of PGA, PGV, Intensity, and Sa Shakemaps Using Dense MEMS-Based Sensors in Taiwan
by Benjamin M. Yang, Himanshu Mittal and Yih-Min Wu
Sensors 2021, 21(3), 943; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030943 - 31 Jan 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3549
Abstract
Using low-cost sensors to build a seismic network for earthquake early warning (EEW) and to generate shakemaps is a cost-effective way in the field of seismology. National Taiwan University (NTU) network employing 748 P-Alert sensors based on micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology is operational [...] Read more.
Using low-cost sensors to build a seismic network for earthquake early warning (EEW) and to generate shakemaps is a cost-effective way in the field of seismology. National Taiwan University (NTU) network employing 748 P-Alert sensors based on micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology is operational for almost the last 10 years. This instrumentation is capable of recording the strong ground motions of up to ± 2g and is dense enough to record the near-field ground motion. It has proven effective in generating EEW warnings and delivering real-time shakemaps to the concerned disaster relief agencies to mitigate the earthquake-affected regions. Before 2020, this instrumentation was used to plot peak ground acceleration (PGA) shakemaps only; however, recently it has been upgraded to generate the peak ground velocity (PGV), Central Weather Bureau (CWB) Intensity scale, and spectral acceleration (Sa) shakemaps at different periods as value-added products. After upgradation, the performance of the network was observed using the latest recorded earthquakes in the country. The experimental results in the present work demonstrate that the new parameters shakemaps added in the current work provide promising outputs, and are comparable with the shakemaps given by the official agency CWB. These shakemaps are helpful to delineate the earthquake-hit regions which in turn is required to assist the needy well in time to mitigate the seismic risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Technologies and Data Analysis Methods for Seismic Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop