New Globalization vs. Anti-Globalization: Current Challenges in International Political Economy

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2024 | Viewed by 1617

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, 691 00 Komotini, Greece
2. School of Business, University of Nicosia, 2417 Nicosia, Cyprus
3. School of Social Sciences, Business & Organisation Administration (BOA), Hellenic Open University, 263 35 Patra, Greece
Interests: international political economy; globalization dynamics; economic development; innovation economics; entrepreneurship; regional-local development and business ecosystems; evolutionary economics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

I cordially invite you to contribute to the upcoming Special Issue of Societies, entitled "New Globalization vs. Anti-Globalization: Current Challenges in International Political Economy". As we know, globalization is a complex, constantly evolving phenomenon with significant economic, political, and social ramifications. This Special Issue seeks to explore the challenges and opportunities presented by globalization, with a particular focus on the tensions between different perspectives.

I encourage submissions that examine the impact of globalization on various issues, including economic development, transnational corporations, inequality, governance, civil society, and the benefits of globalization for developing economies. I believe that both the liberal approach to globalization, which emphasizes the importance of free trade, investment, and innovation in promoting economic growth and development, and the anti-globalization perspective, which argues that globalization has contributed to the underdevelopment of certain regions and increased inequality, are important perspectives to consider. The new globalization represents a synthesis of these perspectives, recognizing that globalization has both positive and negative consequences.

Multidisciplinary approaches are welcome, and I encourage contributions from scholars in different fields. The dynamics of entrepreneurship and innovation are important factors in understanding the impact of globalization on developing economies, and the hegemonic stability theory suggests that a dominant economic power is necessary to maintain global stability and facilitate economic growth.

Some of the themes I am interested in exploring include the impact of the new globalization and different perspectives on economic development, as well as the role of transnational corporations in shaping globalization and promoting policies and values. I also aim to investigate the relationship between globalization and inequality, including the impacts of globalization on income distribution and labor rights. The impact of globalization on state sovereignty and national economic policies, and the ways in which different perspectives address these challenges, are also important themes I will explore.

Theoretical perspectives on globalization that examine the rules, norms, and institutions that shape economic activity are critical to understanding the effects of globalization. Additionally, I will investigate the role of new technologies and the fourth industrial revolution in shaping globalization and the challenges faced by different perspectives in promoting alternative visions of globalization. Finally, the new role of civil society in shaping globalization is another important theme to be explored.

I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Dimos Chatzinikolaou, Ph.D. (c), for his exceptional editorial assistance. He is an outstanding young researcher with brilliant prospects, high level of professionalism and scientific competence.

I encourage you to review the cited works in the call for submissions to gain a deeper understanding of the issues we are interested in. In this Special Issue, contributions should be in one of the three categories of papers (article, conceptual paper, or review) of the journal and address the topic of the Special Issue.

I eagerly anticipate receiving your contributions and the opportunity to engage with the rich and diverse perspectives that will be presented in this Special Issue.

Sincerely,

Dr. Charis Michael Vlados
Guest Editor

References

Baldwin, R. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Belknap Press.

Boyer, R. (2015). Économie Politique des Capitalismes: Théorie de la Régulation et des Crises [Political Economy of Capitalisms: Theory of Regulation and Crisis]. La Découverte.

Broome, A. (2014). Issues and Actors in the Global Political Economy. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Cohen, B. J. (2008). International Political Economy: An Intellectual History. Princeton University Press.

Gill, S., & Law, D. (1988). The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton University Press.

Paquin, S. (2016). Theories of International Political Economy: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Phillips, N. (2005). Globalizing International Political Economy. Macmillan Education UK.

Rodrik, D. (1998). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Challenge, 41(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.1998.11472025

Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W.W Norton & Company.

Strohmer, M. F., Easton, S., Eisenhut, M., Epstein, E., Kromoser, R., Peterson, E. R., & Rizzon, E. (2020). Introduction. In M. F. Strohmer, S. Easton, M. Eisenhut, E. Epstein, R. Kromoser, E. R. Peterson, & E. Rizzon (Eds.), Disruptive Procurement: Winning in a Digital World (pp. 1–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38950-5_1

Vlados, Ch. (2019). The Phases of the Postwar Evolution of Capitalism: The Transition from the Current Crisis into a New Worldwide Developmental Trajectory. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 18(4), 457–488. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341528

Vlados, Ch., & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2021). Mutations of the Emerging New Globalization in the Post-COVID-19 Era: Beyond Rodrik’s Trilemma. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(6), 855–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1954081

Watson, M. (2005). Foundations of International Political Economy. Macmillan Education UK.

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • new globalization
  • anti-globalization
  • international political economy
  • transnational corporations
  • inequality
  • civil society
  • hegemonic stability theory
  • fourth industrial revolution
  • school of regulation

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 2566 KiB  
Article
The Current Evolution of International Political Economy: Exploring the New Theoretical Divide between New Globalization and Anti-Globalization
by Charis Michael Vlados
Societies 2024, 14(8), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080135 - 25 Jul 2024
Viewed by 156
Abstract
This study explores the evolving theoretical divide within the field of International Political Economy (IPE), focusing on the debate between the advocates of new globalization and critics from the anti-globalization perspective. By conducting an integrative review of the contemporary literature, we explore the [...] Read more.
This study explores the evolving theoretical divide within the field of International Political Economy (IPE), focusing on the debate between the advocates of new globalization and critics from the anti-globalization perspective. By conducting an integrative review of the contemporary literature, we explore the foundational theories, core components, and primary theorists of both perspectives, aiming to understand their predictions for future global dynamics. The investigation reveals a polarization in theoretical orientation, reflecting divergent views on the implications of globalization. Through a critical analysis, the paper identifies the liberal international order and the respective contemporary neo-Marxist viewpoints as central to the debate, evaluating their critiques and contributions to understanding the new globalization’s trajectory. We suggest a synthesis of these perspectives, positing that the future of globalization—or “new globalization”—will be influenced by structural changes in global power dynamics, ongoing crises, and technological progress. This is encapsulated in the “evolutionary structural triptych” (EST) approach, which perceives the world economy as an evolutionary result of political, economic, and technological structures, which correspondingly reposition the objectives of stability, growth, and innovation in the new emerging era. In conclusion, we advocate for a balanced approach to globalization, emphasizing the need for policies that promote fairness, sustainability, and cooperation in the changing global environment. This leads to the re-introduction of an appealing concept for globalization’s future: a new, realistic, open, and innovative global liberalism. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop