Sustainable Development Standards

A special issue of Standards (ISSN 2305-6703).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2025 | Viewed by 10276

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Interests: process systems engineering; environmental engineering; sustainable development in chemical and process industries; process design; retrofit and optimization; energy integration; water and waste reduction; recycling; cleaner production; indicators of sustainable development; sustainable university; sustainable consumption; standardization
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Within human development, human existence is endangered by humans themselves. Climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, waste disposal, and resource scarcity, to name just a few environmental concerns, are some of the drivers of global crises. Diminishing fundamental resources like clean water, fresh air, fertile land, and critical raw materials are examples of additional problems. Social crises result from neglecting human rights, food supplies, health, and elderly care, maintaining non-equalities, unemployment, etc. Economic sustainability requires a balance between economic growth, resource efficiency, social equity, and financial stability; it involves renewable sources and their efficiency, zero waste and circular economy, innovations, quality management, and good corporate governance.

The United Nations accepted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 to address the above problems. The International Organization for Standardization has accepted many ISO standards dealing with the SDGs. The United Nations Forum on Sustainability Standards (UNFSS) has published many Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSSs) that “guarantee that the products you buy do not hurt the environment and the people that make them”. The G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance are the international standard for corporate governance in shareholder rights, corporate disclosure and reporting, climate-related and other sustainability risks, and opportunities. The EU’s European Green Deal was realized in many directives on Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D).

Several boards were recently established to develop and approve sustainability disclosure standards, e.g., International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) established by the IFRS Foundation, Global Sustainability Standards Board (GSSB) issuing GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standards, and EFRAG with European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). However, a lot of work still needs to be conducted in the future.

This Special Issue aims to present recent publications, plans, proposals, and needs for additional standards, which could ensure a better future for humanity. Some of the main topics include:

  • Air, water, and soil pollution.
  • Climate change is caused by excessive greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere due to human activities.
  • The loss of biodiversity.
  • The overexploitation of natural resources, zero waste, and circular economy.
  • Economic models that involve unsustainable consumption.
  • Poverty and socioeconomic inequality.
  • Discrimination, prejudice, and social exclusion.
  • Lack of access to resources, and critical raw materials.
  • Insecurity and conflict, locally, regionally, and globally.
  • Poor governance, which includes phenomena such as corruption and institutional inefficiency.
  • The responsible management of resources.
  • The capacity for efficiency and innovation of economic systems and enterprises.
  • Financial stability at the macro level.
  • State-level social innovation, that is, each country’s commitment to promoting policies, programs and initiatives that address crucial social issues such as poverty, gender equality, access to education and health care, environmental sustainability, and other social issues.
  • International cooperation and partnerships between public administration and private enterprises.
  • The level of equity and social inclusion.
  • Corporate responsibility.

Prof. Dr. Peter Glavič
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Standards is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • standard
  • sustainability
  • environmental
  • social
  • economic
  • governance
  • reporting

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

25 pages, 2688 KiB  
Article
Advancing Social Sustainability in BREEAM New Construction Certification Standards
by Anosh Nadeem Butt
Standards 2025, 5(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5010008 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 239
Abstract
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is widely recognized for promoting environmental sustainability in the built environment, with a strong focus on energy efficiency, resource management, and ecological impact. However, as sustainability entails environmental and economic dimensions but also social dimensions, the [...] Read more.
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is widely recognized for promoting environmental sustainability in the built environment, with a strong focus on energy efficiency, resource management, and ecological impact. However, as sustainability entails environmental and economic dimensions but also social dimensions, the current BREEAM New Construction standards do not fully address social sustainability targets. This article explores the potential for expanding BREEAM New Construction standards to more comprehensively incorporate social sustainability, ensuring that certified projects contribute to the well-being of their occupants and surrounding communities. Through a review of existing BREEAM categories, technical manuals, standards, and an analysis of gaps related to social sustainability, this paper identifies key areas for potential improvement, including user satisfaction, protecting workers’ and human rights, legacy planning, education and skills, and emergency response planning. These gaps are mapped against existing BREEAM categories and credits, with recommendations to introduce additional credits across the categories of management, materials, energy, waste, land use and ecology, health and well-being, and water. Additionally, this paper highlights the importance of transdisciplinary collaboration—bringing together architects, urban planners, social scientists, and public health experts—to effectively address the complexity of social sustainability in building design and certification. The proposed additions to BREEAM New Construction standards, alongside recommendations for industry and policymakers, offer guidelines for the evolution of green building certifications toward a more holistic approach to sustainability. This shift ensures that future certified buildings reduce environmental impact and promote social equity, health, and community well-being simultaneously. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 301 KiB  
Article
Asymmetric Effect of Natural Resource Exploitation on Climate Change in Resource-Rich African Countries
by Adewale Samuel Hassan
Standards 2025, 5(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5010007 - 28 Feb 2025
Viewed by 145
Abstract
This study investigated the asymmetric impact of natural resource exploitation on climate change in resource-rich African countries, based on panel data from 1980 to 2022. The dynamic common correlated effect (DCCE) and dynamic seemingly unrelated regression (DSUR) econometric techniques were employed to evaluate [...] Read more.
This study investigated the asymmetric impact of natural resource exploitation on climate change in resource-rich African countries, based on panel data from 1980 to 2022. The dynamic common correlated effect (DCCE) and dynamic seemingly unrelated regression (DSUR) econometric techniques were employed to evaluate the long-term effects of positive shocks and negative shocks to natural resource exploitation. The findings revealed a positive relationship between both positive and negative shocks to natural resource exploitation and temperature, with increases in natural resource exploitation exerting a more intensified impact on temperature than decreases. In contrast, both positive and negative changes in natural resource exploitation are negatively related to precipitation, with an increased exploitation intensity having a more pronounced effect on rainfall patterns. The study also highlights the critical role of control variables such as GDP per capita, urban population, and total energy consumption in altering temperature and precipitation patterns. The findings underscore the importance of adopting sustainable natural resource extraction practices, integrating green technologies, and promoting collaboration across natural resource exploitation and renewable energy value chains to mitigate the negative impacts of natural resource exploitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)
29 pages, 5219 KiB  
Article
A Risk Analysis Model for Biosecurity in Brazil Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
by Fillipe Augusto da Silva, Adriana Marcos Vivoni, Harrison Magdinier Gomes, Leonardo Augusto dos Santos Oliveira, Annibal Parracho Sant’Anna and Luiz Octávio Gavião
Standards 2025, 5(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5010002 - 17 Jan 2025
Viewed by 815
Abstract
This study proposes a risk analysis model based on the principles of ISO 31000 and decision theory for biological agents with potential for offensive use in Brazil. Bibliographic research was conducted on the main models already published on the subject. The German risk [...] Read more.
This study proposes a risk analysis model based on the principles of ISO 31000 and decision theory for biological agents with potential for offensive use in Brazil. Bibliographic research was conducted on the main models already published on the subject. The German risk classification system was adopted as the main reference because it is adjustable and adopts a semiquantitative approach. After translating and adapting this model to the Brazilian context, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to generate a hierarchical tree with criteria and subcriteria to be considered in the risk assessment. A questionnaire was administered to a group of experts to evaluate the relevant criteria and subcriteria and the risks related to three biological agents (Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, and Francisella tularensis), which were selected in an exploratory manner to exemplify the application of the model. According to the results, the criterion of impact of a biological attack was given greater importance when compared with the probability of occurrence of this event. According to the subcriteria, the greatest weight was attributed to human health when compared with agriculture, the environment, or the economy. Finally, in the evaluation of the three pathogens, B. anthracis was identified as having the highest risk for offensive use in Brazil. This research is focused on a practical approach and can be implemented by competent agencies to foster their capacity for biological defense by determining which pathogens represent the greatest risk to society. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 897 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Environmental Sustainability Corridor: Carbon Emissions in Relation to Gold Price, Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment, and Renewable Energy Consumption
by Mehdi Seraj and Ayantayo Rukayat Olaide
Standards 2024, 4(4), 247-261; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards4040012 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 807
Abstract
The growing concerns about global warming and its perceived influence on economic sustainability require a reassessment of the environmental consequences of gold mining, with a special focus on BRICS countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. This paper examines the environmental sustainability [...] Read more.
The growing concerns about global warming and its perceived influence on economic sustainability require a reassessment of the environmental consequences of gold mining, with a special focus on BRICS countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. This paper examines the environmental sustainability corridor, carbon emission, gold price, economic growth, foreign direct investment (FDI), and renewable energy use between 1989 and 2020. The long-run association among the variables is checked by us through the PMG technique. Our findings indicate that while the gold price, FDI, and renewable energy use decrease carbon emission, economic growth adds to the increase in carbon emissions in the long run. These findings bring out the dual challenge of promoting economic growth while managing environmental impact. The study underlines how policymakers need to provide regulatory frameworks which will encourage renewable energy and responsible foreign investment, as a means of trying to mitigate the environmental impacts of gold mining and achieve sustainable development. Our research adds to the continuing debate about how economic expansion can be balanced with environmental preservation for resource-rich countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)
Show Figures

Figure 1

51 pages, 1377 KiB  
Article
Beyond Compliance: A Deep Dive into Improving Sustainability Reporting Quality with LCSA Indicators
by Suzana Ostojic, Jana Gerta Backes, Markus Kowalski and Marzia Traverso
Standards 2024, 4(4), 196-246; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards4040011 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1568
Abstract
This study addresses the critical need for improved sustainability reporting in the construction sector, focusing on the integration of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) indicators to enhance reporting quality and promote standardization. The increasing regulatory pressure from the European Commission, particularly in sustainability [...] Read more.
This study addresses the critical need for improved sustainability reporting in the construction sector, focusing on the integration of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) indicators to enhance reporting quality and promote standardization. The increasing regulatory pressure from the European Commission, particularly in sustainability reporting, has intensified the demand for corporate transparency. Despite these efforts, many companies still face challenges in implementing robust sustainability performance measures. This research employs a systematic literature review alongside the case studies of three leading German construction companies to critically assess the current reporting practices and explore the integration potential of LCSA indicators. The findings highlight a significant gap between the existing sustainability disclosures and LCSA indicators, with only 7–19% of the assessed indicators being integrated into the current reporting practices. Although some consistency in reporting themes and qualitative disclosures is evident, the misalignment with LCSA indicators underscores the need for further integration of standardized, life cycle-based metrics. This study concludes that collaborative efforts among companies, policymakers, and LCSA researchers are required to bridge this gap, ensuring the adoption of the existing, scientifically robust indicators that enhance the precision, comparability, and transparency of sustainability reporting in the construction sector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 516 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Strategies for Improving Humanitarian Supply Chain Management in the United Nations Using Dynamic Capability Theory
by Mirjana Mazar, Kenneth Gossett and Manish Shashi
Standards 2024, 4(4), 154-175; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards4040009 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 2207
Abstract
The purpose of the qualitative multiple case study was to explore the strategies some supply chain managers of the United Nations (UN) use to leverage operational efficiencies in the UN humanitarian programs. As a result, communities supporting sustainability and peace or those fostering [...] Read more.
The purpose of the qualitative multiple case study was to explore the strategies some supply chain managers of the United Nations (UN) use to leverage operational efficiencies in the UN humanitarian programs. As a result, communities supporting sustainability and peace or those fostering economic development will be able to respond effectively to humanitarian crises. Moreover, the UN can remain operational and engage in political and conflict-reduction interventions integral to economic and social recovery and sustainability. This study applied the qualitative multiple case study through semi-structured interviews with nine supply chain managers in the United Nations, direct observations, document analysis, and artifacts. The research is grounded in the dynamic capability theory (DCT). The research revealed several strategies that supply chain managers of the UN use to ensure operational efficiencies grouped around three themes: (a) analytical, innovation, and knowledge management strategies; (b) effective supply chain management leadership strategies; and (c) risk management strategies. This study is one of the first to apply generic findings of humanitarian supply chain studies to the United Nations, the global organization with diverse mandates that continuously strives to achieve efficiencies required by donors providing financial support, thus remaining operational. The study’s results could help leaders in the various humanitarian organizations who operate in vulnerable environments and under strict scrutiny from donors to deliver their aid programs most efficiently by understanding dynamic capabilities. Previous studies indicate the lack of strategic frameworks applicable to the United Nations that could improve decision-making at the strategic, tactical, and operational levels, facilitate collaboration among supply chain stakeholders, and reduce the costs of the operational performance of the supply chain system in the UN. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)
Show Figures

Figure A1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

20 pages, 283 KiB  
Review
EU Environmental Protection in Regard to Sustainable Development: Myth or Reality?
by Ivana Špelić and Alka Mihelić-Bogdanić
Standards 2024, 4(4), 176-195; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards4040010 - 12 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1464
Abstract
According to conclusions agreed to in the 1995 Report of the World Summit for Social Development and the 2015 Sustainable Development Summit, seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs) have been ratified and published as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In 2022, the 8th [...] Read more.
According to conclusions agreed to in the 1995 Report of the World Summit for Social Development and the 2015 Sustainable Development Summit, seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs) have been ratified and published as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In 2022, the 8th Environment Action Programme was legally agreed upon, following the six European Green Deal priorities. These SDGs serve as a constant reminder of the importance of globally coordinated actions in compliance with the theory of sustainable development. However, more than a constant reminder, this international agreement should become the foundation for necessary change. On 22 July 2024, the daily global average temperature reached a new record high. The EU treaties signed between 1951 and 2007 laid the foundation for the creation of EU environmental policy. However, those EU treaties, along with environmental policy, form merely a non-binding and minimum set of priorities without any sanctions imposed for illegal practices. In 2021, EU member countries adopted the European Climate Law as the first legally binding document seeking to achieve goals set by the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal. Any further EU sustainable development policies are dependent on global cooperation as a key element of survival. With the EU’s dependent on the rest of the world for its energy, the forcing of any obligatory change will be hard to achieve. This proves the importance of the 17th SDG, agreed in 2015. Only global partnership for sustainable development can prevent further damage to our ecosystem and achieve priorities set by the EU and UN agendas. The review aims to present the connection between sustainable development (SD) goals defined by the European Commission, for which the most important aspects are the need to meet the environmental requirements to protect future needs in the long run, and to confront the shortcomings of European law-making practices, in which most crucial reforms are presented as non-binding legal acts. Finally, in 2024 members of the European Parliament established an extended list of environmental crimes to be regarded as punishable offences and replaced the Environmental Crime Directive, making criminal activities and offences potentially legally punishable; however, it is yet to be seen how this initiative will be incorporated within the national legislations of each EU member country and to what extent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

10 pages, 435 KiB  
Perspective
Integrating Climate Change Adaptation and Water Resource Management: A Critical Overview
by André Lindner and Jürgen Stamm
Standards 2025, 5(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5010004 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 781
Abstract
Water resources are increasingly vulnerable due to the effects of climate change, which influences both their availability and quality. It is crucial to incorporate climate change adaptation strategies into water resource management to address these challenges and support sustainable practices. This article provides [...] Read more.
Water resources are increasingly vulnerable due to the effects of climate change, which influences both their availability and quality. It is crucial to incorporate climate change adaptation strategies into water resource management to address these challenges and support sustainable practices. This article provides a critical overview of recent advancements in this integration, addressing both theoretical frameworks and practical applications. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between mitigation and adaptation strategies, emphasizing their unique characteristics and interdependencies. Climate change alters water quality through increased temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and extreme weather events, necessitating adaptive strategies to maintain water quality. Immediate coping strategies, such as alternative water sources and filtration systems, address pressing issues but must be complemented by incremental and transformational strategies for long-term resilience. Incremental strategies include upgrading infrastructure and enhancing agricultural practices, while transformational strategies involve comprehensive changes like redesigning urban water systems and revising water governance frameworks. This article identifies socio-economic constraints, awareness gaps, and data deficiencies as significant challenges to effective adaptation. It advocates for integrating climate and water policies, enhancing international co-operation, and investing in innovation and technology. Case studies from India and Vietnam illustrate successful integration of climate adaptation into water management, providing valuable insights for other regions. Overall, a holistic, multi-faceted approach is essential to secure a sustainable water future in the face of climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Standards)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop