Next Article in Journal
Improving the Pedestrian’s Perceptions of Safety on Street Crossings. Psychological and Neurophysiological Effects of Traffic Lanes, Artificial Lighting, and Vegetation
Previous Article in Journal
Grappling with Gulf War Illness: Perspectives of Gulf War Providers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 22
10.3390/ijerph17228575
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Awareness and Use of Heated Tobacco Products among Youth Smokers in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study

by
Laurie Long Kwan Ho
1,
William Ho Cheung Li
1,*,
Ankie Tan Cheung
1,
Wei Xia
1 and
Tai Hing Lam
2
1
School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2
School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(22), 8575; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228575
Submission received: 29 September 2020 / Revised: 10 November 2020 / Accepted: 18 November 2020 / Published: 19 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Toxicology and Public Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The growing popularity of heated tobacco products (HTPs) among youth may act as a gateway for smoking and jeopardize youth health. We aimed to describe the use of HTPs among youth smokers in Hong Kong and examine their risk awareness of HTPs as well as awareness of the proposed legislation. We conducted retrospective data analyses on the Youth Quitline Cohort (n = 731). We extracted participants’ sociodemographic data, smoking profiles, and HTP use from 1 January 2017. Participants’ HTP use increased from 5.7% in 2017 to 37.9% in 2020. Among the 731 participants, 175 were HTP users and 556 were HTP nonusers. Compared with nonusers, a significantly higher proportion of HTP users had tried using other tobacco products at least once. The most common reason for using HTPs was curiosity. HTP users were more likely than nonusers to misclassify HTPs as e-cigarettes; agree that HTPs were healthier and contained fewer harmful substances than conventional cigarettes; consider HTPs as a smoking cessation aid; and believe that HTPs could reduce conventional cigarette consumption. Overall, 61.2% of youth smokers disagreed with banning HTPs. Risk awareness of HTPs among youth might affect their likelihood of using these products. Stricter regulations on advertising and intensive health education are imperative to avoid misleading information and limit youth exposure to such harmful products.

1. Introduction

The increasing use of alternative tobacco products among youth has offset the overall decrease in conventional cigarette use and become a global public health concern [1,2]. Spurred by increasing evidence unmasking the detrimental health effects of e-cigarettes, including undermining abstinence [3], encouraging dual use with increased toxicant exposures [4,5], and acting as a gateway for youth smoking [6], many countries and regions have enacted legislation regulating or completely banning such products [7,8]. Unlike e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products (HTPs) have recently been revived by major product innovations and product repositioning to tap into growing markets [9]. Despite the fact that the health effects remain controversial, HTPs have been aggressively promoted and marketed as a safer alternative to conventional cigarettes because they generate a nicotine containing aerosol by heating tobacco at a lower temperature than combusted cigarettes [10]. In July 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the marketing of the I-Quit-Ordinary-Smoking (IQOS) tobacco heating system, which is used in HTPs from a leading manufacturer, and recognized these products as modified risk tobacco products [11]. Although IQOS was granted an exposure modification order by the FDA, the FDA reiterated that these products were neither safe nor “FDA approved.” However, the effect of this FDA authorization on the use of IQOS among youth is unpredictable.
The potential risks of introducing HTPs into the market should not be underestimated because it may increase youth exposure and promote tobacco use among non-smokers, especially young people [12]. A dramatic increase in HTP use among youth has been observed in countries that have authorized the marketing of such products, which suggests that the trendy packaging and various flavors of HTPs mostly cater for young people [1,13]. A longitudinal study showed that there was a threefold increase in HTP use among youth aged 15–19 years in Japan, from 0.6% in 2015 to 2.0% in 2017 [14]. A study from South Korea also found that 2.8% of youth aged 12–18 years had used HTPs after 1 year of these products being legally available in the market [15]. Despite the sale of HTPs being prohibited in Hong Kong, 2.3% of youth reported that they had used such products [16]. In comparison with the findings from Japan and South Korea, HTP use among youth in Hong Kong warrants attention. As the most Westernized city in China, Hong Kong has the lowest smoking prevalence (10.2%) in the developed world and a low youth smoking prevalence (2.5%) [16,17]. Despite this low youth smoking prevalence, growing evidence shows that two-thirds of smokers died prematurely, especially those who started smoking at a young age [18,19,20]. Youth smokers are also more likely to continue smoking in adulthood [21]. To prevent alternative tobacco products from undermining tobacco control efforts and jeopardizing youth health, the Hong Kong government has proposed legislative amendments to enact a total ban on such products. However, these amendments have failed to pass because of filibustering by some legislators and disruption of Bills Committee meetings by the COVID-19 pandemic. Those legislators supported banning e-cigarettes, but proposed allowing the sale of HTPs by classifying them as a safer alternative to conventional cigarettes.
Despite the absence of compelling evidence regarding the harmful effects of HTPs, increasing evidence indicates that the IQOS tobacco heating system may not be as safe as claimed by the manufacturer; this is because of its potentially harmful constituents and the increased concentration of nicotine and other harmful chemicals emitted by HTP devices [22,23,24]. Given that all tobacco products are harmful [25], it is of paramount importance to prevent the initiation and decrease the prevalence of alternative tobacco product use among youth. Previous studies have showed that the perceived risks were associated with the likelihood and pattern of tobacco use [26,27,28,29]. By understanding risk awareness of HTPs among youth, healthcare professionals could predict their smoking behavior [30,31,32], which may facilitate the design of appropriate interventions for promoting smoking cessation among youth and preventing youth smoking. Most available studies examining awareness and use of HTPs among young adults or adults have observed high levels of awareness and increasing use [33,34,35,36], whereas data regarding attitudes toward and use of HTPs among youth remain scarce. To fill this gap in the literature and inform health initiatives and regulatory decision-making, the present study aimed to (1) examine youth smokers’ risk awareness of HTPs; (2) determine youth smokers’ awareness of the proposed legislation; and (3) describe HTP use among youth smokers in Hong Kong.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

We conducted retrospective data analyses on the Youth Quitline (YQ) Cohort of youth smokers. Details of the YQ service have been described elsewhere [37,38]. YQ participants were: (1) aged 14–25 years, (2) current smokers who had consumed one or more tobacco product types in the previous 30 days, (3) Cantonese speakers, and (4) willing to receive telephone counseling to support smoking cessation. Youth smokers who had communication barriers or had participated in other smoking cessation programs or services were excluded.
YQ has recorded the use of HTPs among youth smokers since 1 January 2017. In this study, participants were classified as HTP users or nonusers. Individuals who had used at least one HTP in the previous 30 days were defined as HTP users. We further classified HTP users as exclusive HTP users or dual users (those who had used HTPs with other tobacco products in the previous 30 days). Youth smokers who had used tobacco products except HTPs in the previous 30 days were classified as HTP nonusers. The operational definition of smokers had been used in previous smoking research among youth [38].

2.2. Methods

We extracted participants’ sociodemographic data, including sex, age, marital status, educational attainment, and employment status. We also collected participants’ smoking profiles, which included age at starting smoking, daily cigarette consumption, previous use of other tobacco products (e.g., e-cigarettes) except HTPs, previous quit attempts, and readiness to quit. Participants’ nicotine dependency was assessed by the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependency, which is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nicotine addiction [39]. We extracted data for participants’ risk awareness of HTPs and their awareness of the proposed legislation, which were available from 1 January 2018. We asked participants to respond to the statements regarding their risk awareness of HTPs as well as awareness of the proposed legislation, for instance, “Do you agree that HTPs such as IQOS is a type of e-cigarette or equivalent to e-cigarettes?” For HTP users, we also examined their reasons for using such products.
All telephone conversations were audio-recorded with participants’ permission. Verbal informed consent was obtained from youth smokers prior to joining this study. We assured youth smokers about the voluntary nature of participation, in which they could withdraw from the study at any time, and that the confidentiality of the information collected would be maintained.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Use of HTPs and reasons for use were described as percentages. Sociodemographic characteristics and smoking profiles were compared between HTP users and nonusers using χ2 tests for categorical variables and independent sample t-tests for continuous variables. We also used χ2 tests to compare risk awareness of HTPs as well as awareness of the proposed legislation between HTP users and nonusers. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

2.4. Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (UW 05-185 T/848) in 2020.

3. Results

From 1 January 2017 to 30 June 2020, we received 3924 incoming calls, of which 1968 were eligible for the YQ service (Figure 1). Of these, 731 youth smokers agreed to receive telephone counseling to support smoking cessation; 175 (23.9%) were HTP users and 556 (76.1%) were HTP nonusers. Since 1 January 2018, 477 participants have completed telephone follow-up and were asked about their risk awareness of HTPs. Among HTP users, one participant was an exclusive HTP user and 174 were dual users. Figure 2 shows HTP use increased from 5.73% in 2017 to 37.90% in 2020.
HTP users and nonusers had similar sociodemographic characteristics and smoking profiles, with the exception of age and employment status (Table 1). HTP users had a significantly higher mean age than nonusers (19.7 years vs. 19.1 years, p = 0.02, d = 0.20). A significantly higher proportion of HTP users than nonusers were part-time or full-time employees (73.1% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.01, V = 0.12). Otherwise, most participants were male (83.0%), single (98.3%), had an upper secondary educational level (50.1%), and had a mild level of nicotine dependency (68.4%).
Compared with HTP nonusers, a significantly higher proportion of HTP users had tried using other tobacco products at least once (87.4% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001, φ = 0.21). No significant differences were found between HTP users and nonusers in age at starting smoking (14.7 years vs. 14.6 years, p = 0.59), daily cigarette consumption (8.7 vs. 9.3, p = 0.32), previous quit attempts (76.6% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.29), and readiness to quit (p = 0.36).
Table 2 shows participants’ risk awareness of HTPs and their awareness of the proposed legislation. Compared with nonusers, HTP users were more likely to misclassify HTPs as e-cigarettes (36.4% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.01, V = 0.13) and to agree that HTPs were healthier (38.9% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.001, V = 0.21) and contained fewer harmful substances (38.9% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001, V = 0.20) than conventional cigarettes. HTP users were also more likely that nonusers to consider HTPs as a smoking cessation aid (32.5% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001, V = 0.22) and believe that HTPs could reduce conventional cigarette consumption (32.1% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.001, V = 0.16). Regardless of the use of HTPs, 61.2% of youth smokers disagreed with banning HTPs and 54.3% disagreed that banning alternative tobacco products would be a more efficient strategy to control the consumption of such products than promoting smoking cessation. However, no significant difference was found in awareness of the proposed legislation between HTP users and nonusers.
Table 3 shows that participants’ main reasons for using HTPs were curiosity (46.7%), peer influence (33.3%), perceived health benefits (9.3%), and as a smoking cessation aid (8.7%).

4. Discussion

This study found that approximately one-fourth of YQ participants had used HTPs, and the number of youth using HTPs had increased by approximately sevenfold in the last 3 years. The growing use of HTPs among youth smokers shared similar usage pattern among other age groups (e.g., young adults or adults) [15,34,35,36]. This represents an emerging public health challenge that may warrant stricter measures on exposure and access to such harmful products among youth.
Our findings highlight a significant difference in risk awareness toward HTPs between users and nonusers. In general, HTP users were more likely than nonusers to believe that HTPs were less harmful to their health than conventional cigarettes, and could reduce the consumption of conventional cigarettes and help in quitting smoking. This implied that the perceived risk level of HTP use among youth might affect their likelihood of using such products, and thus suggested the need of further investigation. HTP manufacturers, such as Philip Morris International (PMI), have attempted to downplay the harmful effects of HTPs and market them as a safer alternative to conventional cigarettes. Although radio and television marketing of these products is banned, retail marketing and advertising on the Internet are easily accessed by youth. Extensive promotions also increase exposure to HTP advertisements among young people, resulting in higher odds of using such products [40,41]. The implementation of stringent regulations on tobacco advertising is imperative to reduce youth exposure to these products. With the FDA authorization, PMI can market the IQOS system as a tobacco product that “significantly reduces the production of harmful and potentially harmful chemicals” and “reduces body’s exposure to harmful or potentially harmful chemicals by switching completely from combusted cigarettes to IQOS” [11]. Misunderstanding of the message in advertisements among youth may disseminate false beliefs, and create erroneous impressions of the characteristics and health hazards of HTPs. Intensive health education and promotion should be targeted at youth population to reiterate and advocate that there is no safe tobacco product, aiming at preventing smoking initiation among youth. It is also crucial to avoid any misinformation in the media that may mislead youth into believing that the IQOS system is safe for use and approved by the FDA.
Notably, we found that smoking cessation was not reported as a main reason for HTP use among youth. Instead, more than half of the youth smokers had started to use such products because of curiosity, which implies that we cannot reject the gateway hypothesis of HTP use among youth. Our findings also showed that most HTP users were dual users, which might contradict the claims supported by the FDA that completely substituting HTPs for combusted cigarettes can reduce body exposure to harmful chemicals [11]. However, further research is needed for determining the level of youth exposure to HTPs. Furthermore, our findings indicate that youths who had used HTPs were older and employed. This might be because these participants could afford more expensive tobacco products such as HTPs. The present findings provide a reference for the target population in future smoking cessation promotions designed for youth, especially in health education pertinent to alternative tobacco products.
Reviewing the situation in Hong Kong, the government should revisit the proposed ban without exemption for HTPs in the new Legislative Council. However, our results show that a majority of youth smokers disagreed with banning HTPs. This might be because of misconceptions or false beliefs about the characteristics and health hazards of HTPs. The results suggest that rigorous community campaigns are needed to clarify the exposure modification orders issued by the FDA and provide more evidence to support the total ban and enhance the public’s understanding of the legislation. In particular, future studies should investigate the possible gateway effect of HTP use and estimate the level of youth exposure to such products.
Our study had some limitations. First, the generalizability of our findings might be limited as we only included YQ service users though YQ is the only youth-targeted smoking cessation hotline in Hong Kong. Second, potential confounders might have been underexplored by our use of a cross-sectional study design. Further studies may consider comparing the quit rate between HTP users and nonusers to build understanding of the impact of HTP use on smoking cessation among youth.

5. Conclusions

The results indicate a growing use and misconceptions about HTPs among youth smokers. This suggests an imperative need to further investigate the possible gateway effect of HTP use and estimate the level of youth exposure to such products in future studies with the aim of generating evidence to inform health initiatives and regulatory decision-making. Stricter regulations on advertising and intensive health education on the harmful effects of HTPs are of paramount importance to avoid misleading information and increase risk awareness of such products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L.K.H., W.H.C.L. and T.H.L.; methodology, L.L.K.H., W.H.C.L. and W.X.; formal analysis, L.L.K.H., A.T.C. and W.X.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.K.H.; writing—review and editing, W.H.C.L., A.T.C. and T.H.L.; supervision, W.H.C.L.; funding acquisition, W.H.C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Department of Health, Government of Hong Kong SAR, grant number AR16007.

Acknowledgments

We thank the youths for their participation in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gentzke, A.S.; Creamer, M.; Cullen, K.A.; Ambrose, B.K.; Willis, G.; Jamal, A.; King, B.A. Vital Signs: Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students—United States, 2011–2018. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019, 68, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tam, J. E-cigarette, combustible, and smokeless tobacco product use combinations among youth in the united states, 2014–2019. Addict. Behav. 2020, 112, 106636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kalkhoran, S.; Glantz, S.A. E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2016, 4, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Goniewicz, M.L.; Smith, D.M.; Edwards, K.C.; Blount, B.C.; Caldwell, K.L.; Feng, J.; Wang, L.; Christensen, C.; Ambrose, B.; Borek, N.; et al. Comparison of Nicotine and Toxicant Exposure in Users of Electronic Cigarettes and Combustible Cigarettes. JAMA Netw. Open 2018, 1, e185937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Owusu, D.; Huang, J.; Weaver, S.R.; Pechacek, T.F.; Ashley, D.L.; Nayak, P.; Eriksen, M.P. Patterns and trends of dual use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2015–2018. Prev. Med. Rep. 2019, 16, 101009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hammond, D.; Rynard, V.L.; Reid, J.L. Changes in Prevalence of Vaping Among Youths in the United States, Canada, and England from 2017 to 2019. JAMA Pediatr. 2020, 174, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. USA Food and Drug Administration. FDA’s Deeming Regulations for E-Cigarettes, Cigars, and All Other Tobacco Products. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/tobaccoproducts/labeling/rulesregulationsguidance/ucm394909.htm (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  8. National Law Information Center. National Health Promotion Act. Available online: https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/files/live/South%20Korea/South%20Korea%20-%20National%20Health%20Promotion%20Act%20%28No.%204914%29%20of%201995.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  9. Caputi, T.L. Industry watch: Heat-not-burn tobacco products are about to reach their boiling point. Tob. Control. 2017, 26, 609–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Simonavicius, E.; McNeill, A.; Shahab, L.; Brose, L.S. Heat-not-burn tobacco products: A systematic literature review. Tob. Control. 2019, 28, 582–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Authorizes Marketing of IQOS Tobacco Heating System with ‘Reduced Exposure’ Information. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-marketing-iqos-tobacco-heating-system-reduced-exposure-information. (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  12. Papaleontiou, L.; Agaku, I.T.; Filippidis, F.T. Effects of Exposure to Tobacco and Electronic Cigarette Advertisements on Tobacco Use: An Analysis of the 2015 National Youth Tobacco Survey. J. Adolesc. Health 2020, 66, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McKelvey, K.; Popova, L.; Kim, M.; Chaffee, B.W.; Vijayaraghavan, M.; Ling, P.; Halpern-Felsher, B. Heated tobacco products likely appeal to adolescents and young adults. Tob. Control. 2018, 27, s41–s47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tabuchi, T.; Gallus, S.; Shinozaki, T.; Nakaya, T.; Kunugita, N.; Colwell, B. Heat-not-burn tobacco product use in Japan: Its prevalence, predictors and perceived symptoms from exposure to secondhand heat-not-burn tobacco aerosol. Tob. Control. 2018, 27, e25–e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kang, H.; Cho, S.-I. Heated tobacco product use among Korean adolescents. Tob. Control. 2019, 29, 466–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Census and Statistics Department. Thematic Household Survey Report no. 70: Pattern of Smoking 2020. Available online: https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11302702020XXXXB0100.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  17. Ho, S.-Y.; Chen, J.; Leung, L.T.; Mok, H.Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, M.P.; Lam, T.H. Adolescent Smoking in Hong Kong: Prevalence, Psychosocial Correlates, and Prevention. J. Adolesc. Health 2019, 64, S19–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lam, T.H.; He, Y. Lam and He Respond to “The Challenge of Tobacco Control in China”. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 179, 1074–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pirie, K.; Peto, R.; Reeves, G.K.; Green, J.; Beral, V. The 21st century hazards of smoking and benefits of stopping: A prospective study of one million women in the UK. Lancet 2013, 381, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Thun, M.J.; Carter, B.D.; Feskanich, D.; Freedman, N.D.; Prentice, R.; Lopez, A.D.; Hartge, P.; Gapstur, S.M. 50-Year Trends in Smoking-Related Mortality in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chan, S.S.C.; Leung, D.Y.; Abdullah, A.S.M.; Wong, V.T.; Hedley, A.J.; Lam, T.H. A randomized controlled trial of a smoking reduction plus nicotine replacement therapy intervention for smokers not willing to quit smoking. Addiction 2011, 106, 1155–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Auer, R.; Concha-Lozano, N.; Jacot-Sadowski, I.; Cornuz, J.; Berthet, A. Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco Cigarettes. JAMA Intern. Med. 2017, 177, 1050–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Davis, B.; Williams, M.; Talbot, P. iQOS: Evidence of pyrolysis and release of a toxicant from plastic. Tob. Control. 2018, 28, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  24. Helen, G.S.; Iii, P.J.; Nardone, N.; Benowitz, N.L. IQOS: Examination of Philip Morris International’s claim of reduced exposure. Tob. Control. 2018, 27, s30–s36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. World Health Organization. Tobacco. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco (accessed on 11 August 2020).
  26. Cooper, M.; Loukas, A.; Harrell, M.B.; Perry, C.L. College students’ perceptions of risk and addictiveness of e-cigarettes and cigarettes. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 2016, 65, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cooper, M.; Creamer, M.R.; Ly, C.; Crook, B.; Harrell, M.B.; Perry, C.L. Social Norms, Perceptions and Dual/Poly Tobacco Use among Texas Youth. Am. J. Health Behav. 2016, 40, 761–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Popova, L.; Owusu, D.; Weaver, S.R.; Kemp, C.B.; Mertz, C.K.; Pechacek, T.F.; Slovic, P. Affect, risk perception, and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: A population study of U.S. adults. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Elton-Marshall, T.; Driezen, P.; Fong, G.T.; Cummings, K.M.; Persoskie, A.; Wackowski, O.; Choi, K.; Kaufman, A.; Strong, D.; Gravely, S.; et al. Adult perceptions of the relative harm of tobacco products and subsequent tobacco product use: Longitudinal findings from waves 1 and 2 of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study. Addict. Behav. 2020, 106, 106337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Curry, L.A.; Youngblade, L.M. Negative affect, risk perception, and adolescent risk behavior. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2006, 27, 468–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reniers, R.L.; Murphy, L.; Lin, A.; Bartolomé, S.P.; Wood, S.J. Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Behaviour during Adolescence: The Influence of Personality and Gender. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Roditis, M.; Delucchi, K.; Cash, D.; Halpern-Felsher, B. Adolescents’ Perceptions of Health Risks, Social Risks, and Benefits Differ Across Tobacco Products. J. Adolesc. Heal. 2016, 58, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Brose, L.S.; Simonavicius, E.; Cheeseman, H. Awareness and Use of ’Heat-not-burn’ Tobacco Products in Great Britain. Tob. Regul. Sci. 2018, 4, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, J.; Yu, H.; Lee, S.; Paek, Y.-J. Awareness, experience and prevalence of heated tobacco product, IQOS, among young Korean adults. Tob. Control. 2018, 27, s74–s77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Marynak, K.L.; Wang, T.W.; King, B.A.; Agaku, I.T.; Reimels, E.A.; Graffunder, C.M. Awareness and Ever Use of “Heat-Not-Burn” Tobacco Products Among U.S. Adults, 2017. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2018, 55, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nyman, A.L.; Weaver, S.R.; Popova, L.; Pechacek, T.F.; Huang, J.; Ashley, D.L.; Eriksen, M.P. Awareness and use of heated tobacco products among US adults, 2016–2017. Tob. Control. 2018, 27, s55–s61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Chan, S.; Wong, D.C.N.; Fong, D.Y.T.; Leung, A.Y.M.; Lam, D.O.B.; Mak, Y.-W.; Lam, T.H. The Establishment and Promotion of the First Youth Quitline in Hong Kong Challenges and Opportunities. Eval. Health Prof. 2008, 31, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, H.C.W.; Chan, S.S.C.; Wang, M.P.; Ho, K.Y.; Cheung, Y.T.; Chan, V.W.; Lam, T.H. An Evaluation of the Youth Quitline Service Young Hong Kong Smokers. J. Adolesc. Health 2017, 60, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Huang, C.-L.; Lin, H.-H.; Wang, H.-H. The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addict. Behav. 2006, 31, 2324–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Filippidis, F.T.; Laverty, A.A.; Fernandez, E.; Mons, U.; Tigova, O.; Vardavas, C.I. Correlates of self-reported exposure to advertising of tobacco products and electronic cigarettes across 28 European Union member states. Tob. Control. 2017, 26, e130–e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Singh, T.; Agaku, I.T.; Arrazola, R.A.; Marynak, K.L.; Neff, L.J.; Rolle, I.T.; King, B.A. Exposure to Advertisements and Electronic Cigarette Use Among US Middle and High School Students. Pediatrics 2016, 137, e20154155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijerph 17 08575 g001 550
Figure 1. Recruitment of the Youth Quitline from 1 January 2017 to 30 June 2020.
Figure 1. Recruitment of the Youth Quitline from 1 January 2017 to 30 June 2020.
Ijerph 17 08575 g001
Ijerph 17 08575 g002 550
Figure 2. Usage of heated tobacco products (HTPs) in smokers from Youth Quitline 1 January 2017 to 30 June 2020.
Figure 2. Usage of heated tobacco products (HTPs) in smokers from Youth Quitline 1 January 2017 to 30 June 2020.
Ijerph 17 08575 g002
Table
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and smoking profiles of the study sample.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and smoking profiles of the study sample.
VariableNo./Total No. (%) a
All (n = 731)HTP Nonusers
(n = 556)		HTP Users
(n = 175)		p-Value
Age, mean (SD), y19.3 (2.9)19.1 (2.9)19.7 (3.0)0.02
Sex
  Male607/731 (83.0)457/556 (82.2)150/175 (85.7)0.30
  Female124/731 (17.0)99/556 (17.8)25/175 (14.3)
Marital Status
  Single680/692 (98.3)515/525 (98.1)165/167 (98.8)0.74
  Married/cohabitated12/692 (1.7)10/525 (1.9)2/167 (1.2)
Educational attainment
  Lower secondary89/700 (12.7)74/533 (13.9)15/167 (8.9)0.12
  Upper secondary351/700 (50.1)276/533 (51.8)75/167 (45.0)
  Tertiary260/700 (37.2)183/533 (34.3)77/167 (46.1)
Employment status
  Full-time students228/707 (32.3)189/536 (35.3)39/171 (22.8)0.02
  Full-time students and part-time employed271/707 (38.3)193/536 (36.0)78/171 (45.6)
  Employed182/707 (25.7)135/536 (19.1)47/171 (27.5)
  Unemployed26/707 (3.7)19/536 (2.7)7/171 (4.1)
Age at starting smoking, mean (SD), y14.6 (2.9)14.6 (2.8)14.7 (3.2)0.59
Daily cigarette consumption, mean (SD), No.9.2 (7.5)9.3 (7.8)8.7 (6.5)0.32
Previous use of other tobacco products (e.g., e-cigarettes) except HTPs
  Yes524/731 (71.7)371/556 (66.7)153/175 (87.4)<0.001
  No207/731 (28.3)185/556 (33.3)22/175 (12.6)
Previous quit attempts (all tobacco products)
  Yes536/731 (73.3)402/556 (72.3)134/175 (76.6)0.29
  No195/731 (26.7)154/556 (27.7)41/175 (23.4)
Readiness to quit (all tobacco products)
  Pre-contemplation292/731 (39.9)228/556 (41.0)64/175 (36.6)0.36
  Contemplation191/731 (26.1)149/556 (26.8)42/175 (24.0)
  Preparation173/731 (23.7)124/556 (22.3)49/175 (28.0)
  Action75/731 (10.3)55/556 (9.9)20/175 (11.4)
Nicotine dependency by the Fagerström Test
  Mild, 0–3492/719 (68.4)369/548 (67.3)123/171 (71.9)0.52
  Moderate, 4–5163/719 (22.7)128/548 (23.4)35/171 (20.5)
  Severe, 6–1064/719 (8.9)51/548 (9.3)13/171 (7.6)
HTPs = heated tobacco products; e-cigarettes = electronic cigarettes; a sample sizes varied because of missing data on some variables.
Table
Table 2. Youth smokers’ risk awareness of HTPs and their awareness of the proposed legislation.
Table 2. Youth smokers’ risk awareness of HTPs and their awareness of the proposed legislation.
No./Total No. (%) a
All (n = 477)HTP Nonusers
(n = 315)		HTP Users
(n = 162)		p-Value
HTPs are e-cigarettes
  Agree/strongly agree135/462 (29.2)76/300 (25.3)59/162 (36.4)0.01
  Disagree/strongly disagree264/462 (57.1)185/300 (61.7)79/162 (48.8)
  Do not know63/462 (13.6)39/300 (13.0)24/162 (14.8)
HTPs are not addictive
  Agree/strongly agree71/460 (15.4)41/300 (13.7)30/160 (18.8)0.13
  Disagree/strongly disagree326/460 (70.9)219/300 (73.0)107/160 (66.9)
  Do not know63/460 (13.7)40/300 (13.3)23/160 (14.4)
HTPs are better than conventional cigarettes in terms of health
  Agree/strongly agree125/474 (26.4)62/312 (19.9)63/162 (38.9)<0.001
  Disagree/strongly disagree274/474 (57.8)199/312 (63.8)75/162 (46.3)
  Do not know75/474 (15.8)51/312 (16.3)24/162 (14.8)
HTPs contain less harmful substances than conventional cigarettes
  Agree/strongly agree127/474 (26.8)64/312 (20.5)63/162 (38.9)<0.001
  Disagree/strongly disagree272/474 (57.4)197/312 (63.1)75/162 (46.3)
  Do not know75/474 (15.8)51/312 (16.3)24/162 (14.8)
HTPs can help with smoking cessation
  Agree/strongly agree92/451 (20.4)43/300 (14.3)49/151 (32.5)<0.001
  Disagree/strongly disagree303/451 (67.2)212/300 (70.7)91/151 (60.2)
  Do not know56/451 (12.4)45/300 (15.0)11/151 (7.3)
HTPs can reduce conventional cigarette consumption
  Agree/strongly agree106/461 (23.0)54/299 (18.1)52/162 (32.1)0.001
  Disagree/strongly disagree287/461 (62.3)200/299 (66.9)87/162 (53.7)
  Do not know68/461 (14.8)45/299 (15.1)23/162 (14.2)
HTPs should be banned
  Agree/strongly agree101/466 (21.7)66/307 (21.5)35/159 (22.0)0.79
  Disagree/strongly disagree285/466 (61.2)182/307 (59.3)103/159 (64.8)
  Do not know/No comment80/466 (17.2)59/307 (19.2)21/159 (13.2)
Government should regulate HTPs but not ban
  Agree/strongly agree228/462 (49.4)140/300 (46.7)88/162 (54.3)0.12
  Disagree/strongly disagree168/462 (36.4)116/300 (38.7)52/162 (32.1)
  Do not know/No comment66/462 (14.3)44/300 (14.7)22/162 (13.6)
Banning of e-cigarettes and HTPs would be more efficient to control the consumptions of these products than promoting smoking cessation
  Agree/strongly agree141/462 (30.5)97/300 (32.3)44/162 (27.2)0.21
  Disagree/strongly disagree251/462 (54.3)157/300 (52.3)94/162 (58.0)
  Do not know/No comment70/462 (15.2)46/300 (15.3)24/162 (14.8)
a Sample sizes varied because of missing data on some variables.
Table
Table 3. Reasons for using HTPs.
Table 3. Reasons for using HTPs.
Reason for Using HTPs bNo./Total No. (%) a
Curiosity 70/150 (46.7)
Peer influence 50/150 (33.3)
Perceived health benefits14/150 (9.3)
Use as a smoking cessation aid 13/150 (8.7)
Others 3/150 (2.0)
a Missing data were excluded; b only HTP users were asked the reason for using HTPs.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ho, L.L.K.; Li, W.H.C.; Cheung, A.T.; Xia, W.; Lam, T.H. Awareness and Use of Heated Tobacco Products among Youth Smokers in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228575

AMA Style

Ho LLK, Li WHC, Cheung AT, Xia W, Lam TH. Awareness and Use of Heated Tobacco Products among Youth Smokers in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(22):8575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ho, Laurie Long Kwan, William Ho Cheung Li, Ankie Tan Cheung, Wei Xia, and Tai Hing Lam. 2020. "Awareness and Use of Heated Tobacco Products among Youth Smokers in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 22: 8575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228575

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop