Next Article in Journal
Effect of Linker Elongation on the VGSC Affinity and Anticonvulsant Activity among 4-Alkyl-5-aryl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione Derivatives
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical and Sensory Properties of Waffles Supplemented with Almond Skins
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Bioaccessibility Assessment of Phenolic Compounds from Encapsulated Grape Pomace Extract by Ionic Gelation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Polyphenols from the Aqueous Extract of Aloysia citrodora in the Inhibition of Aflatoxin B1 Synthesis in Aspergillus flavus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 13
10.3390/molecules28135286
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimization of the Extraction Conditions of Bioactive Compounds from Ocimum basilicum Leaves Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction via a Sonotrode

by
Carolina Aloisio
1,2,†,
María del Carmen Razola-Díaz
3,4,†,
María José Aznar-Ramos
3,4,
Marcela R. Longhi
5,
Alfonsina E. Andreatta
1 and
Vito Verardo
3,4,*
1
Ingeniería de Procesos Sustentables, Facultad Regional San Francisco, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, San Francisco 2400, Argentina
2
Unidad de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnología Farmacéutica (UNITEFA), CONICET, Córdoba 5000, Argentina
3
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Campus of Cartuja, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
4
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology ‘José Matáix’, Biomedical Research Center, University of Granada, Avda del Conocimiento s/n., 18100 Granada, Spain
5
Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Ciudad Universitaria, Córdoba 5000, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed to the research work.
Molecules 2023, 28(13), 5286; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135286
Submission received: 7 June 2023 / Revised: 30 June 2023 / Accepted: 3 July 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analyses and Applications of Phenolic Compounds in Food)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) leaves are rich in bioactive compounds that present therapeutic benefits for human health. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) is frequently used to obtain phenolic compounds from plants/herbal sources. However, few works have developed multi-variable studies to find the optimal conditions to extract the maximum amount of compounds, especially when applied to UAE via a sonotrode. The purpose of this work was to perform a multi-variable study by employing a Box–Behnken design to collect the highest active compound content from Ocimum basilicum leaves. The efficacy of the design was endorsed by ANOVA. The studied parameters for UAE via a sonotrode were the ethanol/water ratio, amplitude, and time. The analyzed responses were the rosmarinic acid, the sum of phenolic acids, and the sum of phenolic compounds content. The optimal conditions were found to be 50% ethanol/water, 50% amplitude, and 5 min. Twenty bioactive compounds were identified by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS when the extract was collected by applying the optimal conditions. Ocimum basilicum may be appreciated as a valuable source of important bioactive substances for pharmaceutical use.

1. Introduction

Extracts obtained from the leaves of Ocimum basilicum (sweet basil), belonging to the Lamiaceae family, present many active components, such as monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, oxygenated sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpenes, triterpenes, flavonoids, aromatic compounds, etc. These compounds have been reported to exhibit antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiproliferative/anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiulcer, insecticidal, and tissue-repair-promoting properties [1,2]. Among them, rosmarinic acid is a natural phenolic acid compound, structurally formed as an ester of caffeic acid and 3,4 dihydroxyphenyllactic that was first discovered in Rosmarinus officinalis, but it is present in most plants belonging to the Lamiaceae family, such as Ocimum basilicum [3,4]. It is recognized for its antioxidant qualities which allow it to neutralize free radicals, restricting oxidative effects in human cells and the proliferation of cancer cell lines [5]. Moreover, many other therapeutic effects have been reported, such as hepatoprotective [6,7], lung protective [8,9], and cardioprotective [10,11] responses, highly connected with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [12]. In addition, Dahchour et al. described that this phenolic compound presents benefits for anxiety and depression [3]. One good use of biomass resources, which generates added value from technological developments, requires finding feasible, economic, and sustainable answers to problems of extraction, separation, purification, etc. To the present date, plant active substances are still traditionally extracted using hazardous and non-green solvents, such as methanol, ethyl acetate, acetone, dichloromethane, chloroform, hexane, etc. One of the disadvantages of processing with those solvents is that it requires complete elimination of them before being used as nutraceuticals or ingredients for the food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. Some natural extracts are also obtained through traditional techniques such as steam distillation, which must then be purified, and usually demand a high energy input. Due to the need for ecological processes and products, “green chemistry” promotes a large amount of research on the extraction and treatment of renewable raw materials to obtain natural products and molecules considered “building blocks” for fine chemistry through the development of safer, more sustainable industrial processes with less environmental impact. Thus, emerging pressurized fluid technologies use green and environmentally friendly solvents, as well as microwave-assisted extraction and ultrasound-assisted extraction [13].
Several methods have been reported for the extraction of phytochemicals from the leaves of Ocimum basilicum. Most methods are meant for the extraction of active substances from this plant by using either organic solvents [14,15,16], hydro-distillation [16,17,18], or microwave-assisted extraction with or without solvents [19,20,21]. Recently, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) has gained attention. Ultrasonic baths and sonotrode equipment are two common instruments used for this purpose. Recently, a few works have reported the use of bath ultrasound for the extraction of active compounds from Ocimum basilicum [22,23,24]. Ultrasound baths impart a cheap and simple way to deliver ultrasound energy and allow for the use of a large assortment of solvents as extractants. However, the reproducibility is low, and the irradiation power is lower. Focused ultrasound systems overcome those problems [25]. Ultrasonic sonotrodes focus their energy on a particular sample zone, imparting more efficient cavitation in the fluid, which is an advantage over ultrasonic baths. Moreover, the higher intensity imparted by the ultrasonic probe system produces a much higher force in comparison to the ultrasonic bath (up to 100 times greater) [26]. Hence, it can increase the extraction rate from the plant material. Other advantages of UAE via a sonotrode are reduced extraction time, which allows for the use of green solvents, reduced energy consumption, and a safe extraction procedure, among others [27].
Although UAE has been previously reported in a few works for the bioactive compounds of Ocimum basilicum leaves, the studies have some limitations. For instance, Da s et al. studied different time conditions [22], Hashemi et al. studied different temperature values [24], and Ahmadi et al. varied both [22,24,28]. However, only Hashemi et al. used UAE via a sonotrode, and none of them identified the compounds via high-performance liquid chromatography with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source operating in negative mode and a time-of-flight (TOF) mass detector (ESI) (HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS) or developed a multi-variable design to optimize the extraction conditions [23]. From our knowledge, the unique work that describes a multi-variable study for the extraction of basil was the one reported by Soares et al. using an ultrasonic bath, but they did not take into account individual compounds [29].
The aim of this work was to develop a multi-variable study using a Box–Behnken design to obtain the highest active compound content from Ocimum basilicum leaves. Optimized factors of UAE via a sonotrode, such as ethanol/water composition, extraction time, and amplitude, were established. The identification and quantification of bioactive substances in the extracts were performed by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Identification of Polar and Other Compounds in Ocimum basilicum Extracts by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS

Ocimum basilicum leaf extracts obtained by UAE were analyzed by HPLC coupled to MS with a TOF analyzer. Active substances were identified by rendering their mass spectra, bearing in mind the data reported in the literature and, when available, by co-elution with commercial standards and using several databases. A total of 20 compounds were detected in the extracts collected from Ocimum basilicum leaves, of which 7 have been identified in basil leaves for the first time. All the identified compounds are shown in Table 1 with their retention time, experimental and calculated m/z, error (ppm) and score (%), main m/z in the source fragments, and molecular formulae. In Figure 1, a representative chromatogram of the basil leaf extracts analyzed by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS is shown, whereby the numbers shown correspond to the peaks of Table 1.
Corresponding to peak 1 at 0.42 min with the m/z 133 and the molecular formula C4H6O5, the compound was identified as malic acid, which has been found previously in foods such as unripe apples, grapes, watermelons, cherries, in vegetables such as carrots and broccoli [30], and in Bryophyllum [31] and Raphanus sativus [32] leaves. It is well known that malic acid in leaves is naturally involved in the regulation of stomatal opening and closing [33]. In addition, the malic acid derivative isopropylmalic acid isomers a and b were identified at 1.19 and 2.15 min (peak 4 and 5, respectively) with the m/z 175 and m/z in the source fragment 133, which corresponds to malic acid. It is an intermediate product in the production of the amino acid leucine previously described in several herbs and spices including sweet basil leaves [34]. The organic acid quinic acid isomers a and b were detected at 0.57 and 1.09 min (peaks 2 and 3, respectively) with the molecular formula C7H12O6. At 4.3 min (peak 6) with the m/z 179 and the molecular formula C9H8O4, the compound was identified as caffeic acid. Chicoric acid isomers a and b were detected at 8.29 and 9.51 (peaks 9 and 12, respectively), presenting the m/z 473. Corresponding to peaks 10 and 13 with a molecular formula of C18H16O8, the compounds were identified as rosmarinic acid isomers a and b, respectively. These compounds have previously been described in basil leaves by other authors [35,36,37]. Corresponding to peak 11 at 9.04 min and with the m/z 609 with an ion fragment at m/z 300, the compound was identified as quercetin rutinoside [38]. Peaks 17 and 18 with the m/z 313 correspond to cirsimaritin isomers a and b, respectively. This triterpenic acid has previously been found in basil leaves [39].
Otherwise, some compounds have been identified here for the first time. With a molecular formula of C27H30O15 (peak 15) at 10.21 min, the compound was identified as luteolin hexoside deoxyhexoside in agreement with its m/z in the source fragment 285 according to Mekky et al., who previously described it in sesame oil [40]. At 9.78 min (peak 14) with the m/z 717 and the predicted molecular formula of C36H30O16, the detected compound was proposed to be salvianolic acid as previously described in basil [38]. In the same way, isosalvianolic acid was identified at 14.92 min (peak 20). Peak 7 at 5.43 min with the m/z 387 and its source m/z fragments 207 and 179 was identified as the compound named tuberonic acid glucoside, also known as 12-hydroxyjasmonic acid glucoside, which was first identified in potato [41] and has also been found in other matrices such as lemon verbena [42] and thyme leaf [43]. The compound sesaminol triglucoside (PubChem CID:101394490) was identified at 6.33 min (peak 8) with the m/z 855 according to its source fragments 179 and 161. It has previously been described in sesame [44]. Peak 16, with the m/z 803 and its source m/z fragments 503, 357, 315, and 161, was identified as stevioside, in agreement with the Foodb database (FooDB ID: FDB013538). It has previously been described in stevia leaves [45], and this is the first time it has been described in basil leaves. Peak 19 at 14.74 min at m/z 345 presented a molecular formula of C20H26O5 with an ion fragment at m/z 283 and was identified as rosmanol. This compound has previously been identified and quantified in rosemary and sage [38].

2.2. Fitting the Model

The Box–Behnken experimental design established for the optimization of the conditions for UAE via a sonotrode is presented in Table 2. The evaluated independent factors were ethanol/water (v/v) (X1), amplitude (%) (X2), and time (min) (X3) at three levels, and the response variables to study were the sum of rosmarinic acid, the sum of phenolic acids, and the sum of phenolic compounds in order to maximize them.
As can be seen from the results, the sum of rosmarinic acid ranged between 8.26 and 420.13 µg/g d.w., the sum of phenolic acids ranged between 8.26 and 1458.90 µg/g d.w., and the sum of phenolic compounds ranged from 8.44 to 1559.45 µg/g d.w. In all cases, the minimum values corresponded to run 6 when using 100% ethanol, an amplitude of 20%, and 25 min; meanwhile, the maximum values were at the intermedium conditions (60% ethanol, 60% amplitude, and 25 min).
The experimental results were analyzed by adjusting them to a second-order polynomial regression (Equation (1)). The regression coefficients and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the model and the results for the response variables for Ocimum basilicum are exhibited in Table 3.
The analysis of the model was performed for the three response variables. According to previous reports, the level of significance was α < 0.05 in order to enhance the number of meaningful variables [46,47]. The constants (β0) were significant for all of the responses (p < 0.05). For all of the response variables, the independent factors ethanol/water (X1) and amplitude (X2) showed significant effects in their linear (β1 and β2, respectively) and quadratic forms (β11 and β22, respectively) (p < 0.05). Moreover, the effect of all the crossed terms β12, β13, and β23 were significant for the response variables studied. In the case of the sum of phenolic compounds, a significative effect of the que quadratic regression coefficient of time (X3) was also found (β33).
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed after discarding the non-significant terms at α > 0.05. The models showed high determination coefficients between the independent factors and response variables (R2 > 0.9). Le Man et al. (2010) stated that a model is acceptable when R2 > 0.75 [48]. In addition, the p-values of the lack-of-fits were non-significant (p > 0.05). This parameter was used to verify the adequacy of the model, indicating that the model fits properly (Table 2). Moreover, the p-values of the models were lower than 0.05 for all of the models, making them statistically acceptable.

2.3. Establishment of Optimal Conditions

The three-dimensional plots showing the effects of ethanol/water % (v/v) (X1) with amplitude (%) (X2) (Figure 2a,d,g), ethanol/water % (v/v) (X1) with time (min) (X3) (Figure 2b,e,h), and amplitude (%) (X2) with time (min) (X3) (Figure 2c,f,i) on the rosmarinic acid, the sum of phenolic acids, and the sum of phenolic compounds content are presented in Figure 2.
In Figure 2a,d,g, the maximum rosmarinic acid, the sum of phenolic acids, and the sum of phenolic compounds content, respectively, were obtained with 40–50% ethanol/water and almost the whole range of amplitudes. In Figure 2b,e,h, the higher values were observed at 50% ethanol/water and for the whole range of time used for the three groups of compounds studied. And in Figure 2c,f,i, the maximum amount of compounds was obtained at approximately 50–100% amplitude and up to 10 min.
At 100% ethanol, when increasing the time, Tungmunnithum et al. [49] had the same tendency of increasing rosmarinic acid in Plectranthus scutellarioides L. leaves, as shown here (Table 2, runs 2 and 4).
In this work, we found that higher rosmarinic acid content was observed when increasing the power but reducing the time (Table 2, runs 9, 10, 11, and 2). This means that at a higher amplitude, time plays a more crucial role in increasing or reducing the rosmarinic acid content. Caleja et al. [50] in Melissa officinalis L. only saw differences in the content of rosmarinic acid, at fixed ultrasound power, with time at intermedium ethanol percentage; meanwhile, at extreme times, it showed no effect, and the same was true in this work (Figure 2b). Therefore, in contrast, when using the intermedium value of ethanol/water, higher extraction of rosmarinic acid is achieved with this solvent, maintaining the amplitude at the lowest or highest level but increasing the time, resulting in decreasing the content (Figure 2c).
The maximum values found under the medium amplitude condition could be justified by the higher temperature achieved in the process due to the effect of ultrasound, which can deteriorate the compounds. This effect also occurs when described in microwave extractions when high temperatures are used [51]. The higher ultrasound amplitude causes an increment in the temperature and pressure in the system [52,53]. Yang et al. also reported that extreme ultrasound forces may generate degradation of the substances due to the high temperature and pressure [54]. This finding is in agreement with a study conducted by Lanjekar et al. on poly-phenolic antioxidant extraction from waste mango peel [55] and the work published by Zheng et al. about phenolic compounds’ extraction from foxtail millet bran using UAE [56].
In addition, high time values may result in greater degradation of the target compounds or degradation of the matrix due to higher exposition to ultrasound forces, indeed when higher amplitude values are applied [51]. Moreover, the increment in the extraction time enhances the solution concentration, reducing the cellular osmotic pressure [57]. The result is in agreement with the results reported by Junchi et al., who extracted polysaccharides from Ginkgo biloba leaves [58]. On the other hand, an ethanol concentration higher than 60% did not increase the extraction rate, which may be caused by the change in the polarity of the solvent, which generates a negative effect on the extraction yield [59,60]. Similar responses have been described with other plant materials such as Myrtus communis [61] and Solanum torvum Sw [62] leaves.

2.4. Confirmation of the Optimal Extraction Parameters by a Sonotrode in Ocimum basilicum Leaves

After the optimal conditions were established by the response surface three-dimensional plots, the accuracy of the mathematical model was predicted, which constituted the final step of the RSM. The optimal conditions to obtain the highest rosmarinic acid amount, the sum of phenolic acids, and the sum of phenolic compounds from Ocimum basilicum and the predicted and obtained values of each response are presented in Table 4.
Briefly, the optimal conditions established were 50% ethanol/water (v/v), 50% amplitude, and 5 min. These values were found near the central point of ethanol/water and the amplitude. This performance is comparable with previous reports by our research group about the extraction of anthraquinones from Heterophyllaea pustulata [50] and by other authors for the UAE of antioxidant compounds from Ficaria kochii [63]. On the other hand, different behavior was observed for the time, which represented the minimum used value. These results may be explained by the fact that this ultrasound model decreases process times and due to the higher degradation of the compounds of interest or degradation of the matrix due to higher exposition to ultrasound forces, as mentioned in the above section.
The obtained predictable values under the optimal conditions were 529.97 ± 59.37 µg/g d.w. for rosmarinic acid content, 1657.15 ± 86.09 µg/g d.w. for the sum of phenolic acids, and 1749.04 ± 80.91 µg/g d.w. for the sum of phenolic compounds. Good agreement between the experimental and predicted values for all of the responses was found with a coefficient of variation lower than 2% in all cases. A few works have investigated different aspects of basil composition and extraction methods. Hashemi et al. reported the highest rosmarinic acid content and total phenolics (determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method) for samples treated at 40% amplitude and 45 °C, reaching a maximum value of 156 mg/g [24]. The study highlighted the significant influence of temperature on the rate of rosmarinic acid extraction. Ahmadi et al. determined the optimum conditions for basil extraction, which were 40 min at 62.82 °C. The total phenolic compounds, measured using the Folin–Ciocalteu method, were reported to be 3922.485 mg/mL [64]. Soares et al. investigated the total phenolic content of basil in extra-virgin olive oil through the Folin–Ciocalteu method, which was reported as 135.94 mg GAE/kg. The results from these works indicated a higher concentration of phenolic compounds compared to our study, which may be explained by the fact that they determined the Folin–Ciocalteu reacting substances; meanwhile, in this work, the specific phenolic compounds were determined by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS.
On the other hand, the other authors only quantified basil essential oil compounds, such as Silva et al., who measured linalool and estragole in basil, and Rajabi et al., who measured trans-anethole, estragole, and para-anisaldehyde in basil [23]. Additionally, Soares et al. evaluated different compounds such as alpha-thujene, beta-pinene, eucalyptol, beta-ocimene, camphor, linalool, eugenol, alpha-pinene, camphene, sabinene, myrcene, and limonene [29]. These compounds differ from the ones we evaluated in our study, preventing a direct numerical comparison.
Overall, comparing the numerical data from our work with the studies previously mentioned provides insights into the variations in basil composition and extraction methods. These differences highlight the importance of considering multiple studies to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the chemical profile of basil.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Samples and Chemicals

Fresh leaves of Ocimum basilicum were commercially acquired from a Spanish supermarket in June of 2022. The fresh leaves were air dried, protected from sunlight, and kept at an ambient temperature, and they were then micronized by employing a knife mill provided by IKA Werke GmbH & Co. KG (Staufen, Germany) and sieved to 0.2 mm. Then, the samples were stored in a freezer at −35 °C before analysis. HPLC-grade acetonitrile and acetone were supplied by Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), and purified water was obtained utilizing a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Caffeic acid, quercetin, and rutin were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Experimental Design

In order to optimize the experimental conditions to collect the maximum amount of plant active substances in Ocimum basilicum leaves, a Box–Behnken design with three variables was performed. The three independent variables involved in this work were the ethanol/water ratio (X1), the amplitude of the ultrasound via sonotrode equipment (X2), and the extraction time (X3), with three values for each one. The response variables (Y) were the rosmarinic acid amount, the sum of phenolic acids, and the sum of phenolic compounds determined by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS (Table 2). The percentages of ethanol/water were 20, 60, and 100% (v/v), and the extraction times were 5, 25, and 45 min. These conditions were selected considering previous reports on the extraction of rosmarinic-acid-related compounds from Ocimum basilicum and other plants [30,64,65,66] and Ocimum basilicum leaves [23,25]. Furthermore, the amplitudes of the sonotrode ultrasound equipment were 20, 60, and 100 (%), where the minor level was selected considering the preceding work conducted in our laboratory regarding the extraction of phenolic substances from orange by-products using UAE via a sonotrode [67].
In order to obtain the highest influence of unexplained variability in the responses found, caused by extraneous aspects, the experiments were randomized. In this sense, 15 sequences, along with the midpoint in triplicate, were tested (Table 1). The most suitable implementation for modeling is response surface methodology (RSM). In this approach, the second-order polynomial equation presented below (Equation (1)) is commonly used to study the interrelation between the independent and response variables [65]. The assay layout and evaluation of the most favorable UAE via the sonotrode settings in regard to the greater amount of active compounds were performed employing Statistica 7.0 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).
Y = β 0     + ∑ i = 1 3 β i     X i     + ∑ i = 1 3 β i i   X i 2   + ∑ i = 1 3 ∑ j = i + 1 3 β i j     X i     X j        
where Xi and Xj are the independent variables, Y is the response variable, and β0, βi, βii, and βij are the constant, linear, quadratic, and cross-product coefficients, respectively [66].

3.3. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction via a Sonotrode Applied to Ocimum basilicum Leaves

The procedure was performed by incorporating 0.25 g of Ocimum basilicum leaves with 10 mL of the chosen solvent. The ethanol used was absolute (>99% purity). A UP400St ultrasonic processor (Hielscher, Germany) with a working frequency of 24kHz and the sonotrode S24d3 were used. The ethanol/water ratio, US amplitude, and treatment time were adjusted in agreement with the assay layout. Subsequently, the suspensions were centrifugated at 6000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was placed in a rotor evaporator and resuspended in 1 mL of methanol/water 50/50 (v/v). Finally, the samples were filtered with 0.2 μm nylon syringe membranes and kept at −18 °C until analysis.

3.4. Determination of Polar and Other Compounds in Ocimum basilicum Leaf Extracts by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MSs

Ocimum basilicum leaf extracts collected when UAE via a sonotrode was applied with different parameters was evaluated by an ACQUITY Ultra Performance LC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) associated with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source operating in negative mode and a time-of-flight (TOF) mass detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). All measurements were carried out in triplicate. The active substances were partitioned on an BEH Shield RP18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) at 40 °C using a gradient previously stated by Verni et al. 2020 [68] and using water containing 1% acetic acid as mobile phase A and acetonitrile as mobile phase B. The data were elaborated using MassLynx 4.1 software (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA).

4. Conclusions

A Box–Behnken experimental design of 15 experiments was successfully performed to establish the optimal conditions of UAE via a sonotrode for Ocimum basilicum leaves to achieve extracts with high content in phenolic compounds. The extracts were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS, and a total of 20 compounds were identified, from which seven are described here for the first time in basil leaves. The analysis of variance showed a high correlation between the independent factors and response variables with determination coefficients (R2) and p-model values indicating that the model fits properly. The optimal conditions were established by RSM for the three responses studied (rosmarinic acid, the sum of phenolic acids, and the sum of phenolic compounds), and 50% ethanol/water, 50% amplitude, and 5 min were selected. Under these optimal conditions, the response variables were obtained experimentally and compared with the model predictions, and the validation of the model was confirmed statistically. In conclusion, Ocimum basilicum should be recognized as an important source of bioactive compounds, especially rosmarinic acid, with relevance for their therapeutic employment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V. and A.E.A.; methodology, V.V.; software, M.d.C.R.-D. and M.J.A.-R.; formal analysis, C.A., M.d.C.R.-D. and M.J.A.-R.; investigation, C.A., M.d.C.R.-D. and M.J.A.-R.; data curation, M.d.C.R.-D.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A. and M.d.C.R.-D.; writing—review and editing, M.J.A.-R., M.R.L., A.E.A. and V.V.; visualization, V.V. supervision, M.R.L., A.E.A. and V.V.; funding acquisition, V.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The experimental part of this study was conducted in the summer of 2022 when Carolina Aloisio was an Asociación Universitaria Iberoamericana de Posgrado (AUIP) scholar at the University of Granada in Spain. The authors also wish to acknowledge the financial support and assistance of Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), the Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (UTN), Universidad Nacional de Cordoba (UNC), and the University of Granada (UGR).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Adeshina, I.; Emikpe, B.O.; Jenyo-Oni, A.; Ajani, E.K.; Tiamiyu, L.O. Effect of Dietary Clove Basil, Ocimum Gratissimum, Leaves Extract on Healing of Artificially Wounded African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (B.), Juveniles. J. Appl. Aquac. 2019, 31, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marwat, S.K.; Fazal, R.; Khan, M.S.; Ghulam, S.; Anwar, N.; Mustafa, G.; Usman, K. Phytochemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Sweet Basil-Ocimum basilicum L. (Lamiaceae). Asian J. Chem. 2014, 23, 3773–3782. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dahchour, A. Anxiolytic and Antidepressive Potentials of Rosmarinic Acid: A Review with a Focus on Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects. Pharm. Res. 2022, 184, 106421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Qin, Z.; Yu, S.; Zhou, J. Coordinating Caffeic Acid and Salvianic Acid A Pathways for Efficient Production of Rosmarinic Acid in Escherichia Coli. Metab. Eng. 2023, 76, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chadni, M.; Isidore, E.; Lagalle, F.; Langlait, M.; Dosso, A.; Ioannou, I. Optimization of the Supercritical Extraction of Rosmarinic Acid from Clary Sage Residue and the Antioxidant Activity of the Extracts. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2023, 193, 105830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Domitrović, R.; Škoda, M.; Vasiljev Marchesi, V.; Cvijanović, O.; Pernjak Pugel, E.; Štefan, M.B. Rosmarinic Acid Ameliorates Acute Liver Damage and Fibrogenesis in Carbon Tetrachloride-Intoxicated Mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, S.-Y.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Chen, W.-Y.; Liao, S.-L.; Chou, S.-T.; Yang, C.-P.; Chen, C.-J. Hepatoprotective Activities of Rosmarinic Acid against Extrahepatic Cholestasis in Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 108, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chu, X.; Ci, X.; He, J.; Jiang, L.; Wei, M.; Cao, Q.; Guan, M.; Xie, X.; Deng, X.; He, J. Effects of a Natural Prolyl Oligopeptidase Inhibitor, Rosmarinic Acid, on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Mice. Molecules 2012, 17, 3586–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, J.; Liu, D.; Wan, L. Rosmarinic Acid Ameliorates Septic-Associated Mortality and Lung Injury in Mice via GRP78/IRE1α/JNK Pathway. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2021, 73, 916–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quan, W.; Liu, H.; Zhang, W.; Lou, W.; Gong, Y.; Yuan, C.; Shao, Q.; Wang, N.; Guo, C.; Liu, F. Cardioprotective Effect of Rosmarinic Acid against Myocardial Ischaemia/Reperfusion Injury via Suppression of the NF-ΚB Inflammatory Signalling Pathway and ROS Production in Mice. Pharm. Biol. 2021, 59, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Toutounchi, N.S.; Afrooziyan, A.; Rameshrad, M.; Rezabakhsh, A.; Vaez, H.; Hamedeyazdan, S.; Fathiazad, F.; Garjani, A. Cardioprotective Effects of Rosmarinic Acid on Isoproterenol-Induced Myocardial Infarction in Rats. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 23, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rodrigues, L.B.; Oliveira Brito Pereira Bezerra Martins, A.; Cesário, F.R.A.S.; Ferreira e Castro, F.; de Albuquerque, T.R.; Martins Fernandes, M.N.; Fernandes da Silva, B.A.; Quintans Júnior, L.J.; da Costa, J.G.M.; Melo Coutinho, H.D.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory and Antiedematogenic Activity of the Ocimum basilicum Essential Oil and Its Main Compound Estragole: In Vivo Mouse Models. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2016, 257, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jadhav, H.B.; Annapure, U.S.; Deshmukh, R.R. Non-thermal Technologies for Food Processing. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mabood, F.; Gilani, S.A.; Hussain, J.; Alshidani, S.; Alghawi, S.; Albroumi, M.; Alameri, S.; Jabeen, F.; Hussain, Z.; Al-Harrasi, A.; et al. New Design of Experiment Combined with UV–Vis Spectroscopy for Extraction and Estimation of Polyphenols from Basil Seeds, Red Seeds, Sesame Seeds and Ajwan Seeds. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017, 178, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Teofilović, B.; Grujić-Letić, N.; Goločorbin-Kon, S.; Stojanović, S.; Vastag, G.; Gadžurić, S. Experimental and Chemometric Study of Antioxidant Capacity of Basil (Ocimum basilicum) Extracts. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 100, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Złotek, U.; Mikulska, S.; Nagajek, M.; Świeca, M. The Effect of Different Solvents and Number of Extraction Steps on the Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Basil Leaves (Ocimum basilicum L.) Extracts. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahmoud, E.; Starowicz, M.; Ciska, E.; Topolska, J.; Farouk, A. Determination of Volatiles, Antioxidant Activity, and Polyphenol Content in the Postharvest Waste of Ocimum basilicum L. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, W.J.; Liu, Q.Y.; Li, D.W.; Zhang, Z.M.; You, C.X. Antagonistic Storage Potential of Tagetes Minuta, Eupatorium Fortunei and Ocimum basilicum Oils with Volatile Secondary Metabolites against Tribolium castaneum and Lasioderma serricorne. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 187, 115502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chenni, M.; el Abed, D.; Neggaz, S.; Rakotomanomana, N.; Fernandez, X.; Chemat, F. Solvent Free Microwave Extraction Followed by Encapsulation of O. basilicum L. Essential Oil for Insecticide Purpose. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 86, 101575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kusuma, H.S.; Mahfud, M. RETRACTED: Preliminary Study: Kinetics of Oil Extraction from Basil (Ocimum basilicum) by Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation and Solvent-Free Microwave Extraction. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 21, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lucchesi, M.E.; Chemat, F.; Smadja, J. Solvent-Free Microwave Extraction of Essential Oil from Aromatic Herbs: Comparison with Conventional Hydro-Distillation. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1043, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Da Silva Moura, E.; Faroni, L.R.D.A.; Heleno, F.F.; Rodrigues, A.A.Z.; Prates, L.H.F.; De Queiroz, M.E.L.R. Optimal Extraction of Ocimum basilicum Essential Oil by Association of Ultrasound and Hydrodistillation and Its Potential as a Biopesticide against a Major Stored Grains Pest. Molecules 2020, 25, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ahmadi, S.; Ghavidel, R.A.; Sheikholeslami, Z.; Elahi, M.; Elahi, S. Optimization of ultrasonic assisted extraction of antioxidants and phenolic compounds from red basil using response surface methodology. Agro Food Ind. Hi. Tech. 2015, 26, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hashemi, S.M.B.; Ghorashi, S.; Hadizadeh, F.; Zarei, Z.; Yazdani, M.; Noormohammadi, M. Effect of Amplitude of Ultrasound-Assisted Solvent Extraction and Extraction Temperature on the Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Ocimum basilicum L. Extract. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2017, 19, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar]
  25. De Vallejuelo, S.F.O.; Barrena, A.; Arana, G.; de Diego, A.; Madariaga, J.M. Ultrasound Energy Focused in a Glass Probe: An Approach to the Simultaneous and Fast Extraction of Trace Elements from Sediments. Talanta 2009, 80, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.-L.; Li, X.-Y.; Tang, W.-K.; Zhang, J.-X.; Fang, C.-X.; Zheng, C.-Y. Coupling Continuous Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction with Ultrasonic Probe, Solid-Phase Extraction and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Sodium Danshensu and Four Tanshinones in Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bunge. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 589, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Silva, E.K.; Saldaña, M.D.A. High-Intensity Ultrasound-Assisted Recovery of Cinnamyl Alcohol Glycosides from Rhodiola Rosea Roots: Effect of Probe Diameter on the Ultrasound Energy Performance for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds. Food Bioprod. Process. 2020, 122, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahmadi, A.H.R.; Salehinia, F.; Rastegar, H.; Allameh, A.A.; Rezazadeh, S. Differences in Growth Response of Human Hair Follicle Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Herbal Extracts and a Growth Factor. J. Med. Plants 2018, 17, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Soares, V.P.; Fagundes, M.B.; Guerra, D.R.; Leães, Y.S.V.; Speroni, C.S.; Robalo, S.S.; Emanuelli, T.; Cichoski, A.J.; Wagner, R.; Barin, J.S.; et al. Ultrasound Assisted Maceration for Improving the Aromatization of Extra-Virgin Olive Oil with Rosemary and Basil. Food Res. Int. 2020, 135, 109305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goldberg, I.; Rokem, J.S. Organic and Fatty Acid Production, Microbial. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 421–442. [Google Scholar]
  31. Buser, C.; Matile, P. Malic Acid in Vacuoles Isolated from Bryophyllum Leaf Cells. Z. Für. Pflanzenphysiol. 1977, 82, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Strack, D.; Sharma, V. Vacuolar Localization of the Enzymatic Synthesis of Hydroxycinnamic Acid Esters of Malic Acid in Protoplasts from Raphanus Sativus Leaves. Physiol. Plant 1985, 65, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Si, P.; Shao, W.; Yu, H.; Xu, G.; Du, G. Differences in Microbial Communities Stimulated by Malic Acid Have the Potential to Improve Nutrient Absorption and Fruit Quality of Grapes. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 850807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Human Metabolome Database: Showing Metabocard for 2-Isopropylmalic Acid (HMDB0000402). Available online: https://hmdb.ca/metabolites/HMDB0000402 (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  35. Lee, J.; Scagel, C.F. Chicoric Acid Found in Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Leaves. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kiferle, C.; Lucchesini, M.; Mensuali-Sodi, A.; Maggini, R.; Raffaelli, A.; Pardossi, A. Rosmarinic Acid Content in Basil Plants Grown in Vitro and in Hydroponics. Open Life Sci. 2011, 6, 946–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bahcesular, B.; Yildirim, E.D.; Karaçocuk, M.; Kulak, M.; Karaman, S. Seed Priming with Melatonin Effects on Growth, Essential Oil Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under Salinity Stress. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 146, 112165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ali, A.; Bashmil, Y.M.; Cottrell, J.J.; Suleria, H.A.R.; Dunshea, F.R. LC-MS/MS-QTOF Screening and Identification of Phenolic Compounds from Australian Grown Herbs and Their Antioxidant Potential. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pandey, R.; Kumar, B. HPLC–QTOF–MS/MS-Based Rapid Screening of Phenolics and Triterpenic Acids in Leaf Extracts of Ocimum Species and Their Interspecies Variation. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2016, 39, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mekky, R.H.; Abdel-Sattar, E.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Contreras, M.D.M. Metabolic Profiling of the Oil of Sesame of the Egyptian Cultivar ‘Giza 32’ Employing LC-MS and Tandem MS-Based Untargeted Method. Foods 2021, 10, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Matsuura, H.; Ohkubo, Y.; Yoshihara, T. Occurrence of 11-Hydroxyjasmonic Acid Glucoside in Leaflets of Potato Plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2001, 65, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Quirantes-Piné, R.; Arráez-Román, D.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. Characterization of Phenolic and Other Polar Compounds in a Lemon Verbena Extract by Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2010, 33, 2818–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kitajima, J.; Ishikawa, T.; Urabe, A. A New Hydroxyjasmone Glucoside and Its Related Compounds from the Leaf of Thyme. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 1013–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Moazzami, A.A.; Andersson, R.E.; Kamal-Eldin, A. HPLC Analysis of Sesaminol Glucosides in Sesame Seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Inamake, M.R.; Shelar, P.D.; Kulkarni, M.S.; Katekar, S.M.; Rashmi, T. Isolation and Analytical Characterization of Stevioside from Leaves of Stevia Rebaudiana Bert; (Asteraceae). Int. J. Res. Ayurveda Pharm. 2010, 1, 572–581. [Google Scholar]
  46. Martín-García, B.; Pasini, F.; Verardo, V.; Díaz-De-cerio, E.; Tylewicz, U.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Caboni, M.F. Optimization of Sonotrode Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Proanthocyanidins from Brewers’ Spent Grains. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Díaz-de-cerio, E.; Tylewicz, U.; Verardo, V.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Romani, S. Design of Sonotrode Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Psidium guajava L. Leaves. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 2781–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Le Man, H.; Behera, S.K.; Park, H.S. Optimization of Operational Parameters for Ethanol Production from Korean Food Waste Leachate. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 7, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tungmunnithum, D.; Garros, L.; Drouet, S.; Renouard, S.; Lainé, E.; Hano, C. Green ultrasound assisted extraction of trans rosmarinic acid from Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R.Br. leaves. Plants 2019, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Caleja, C.; Barros, L.; Prieto, M.A.; Barreiro, M.F.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Extraction of rosmarinic acid from Melissa officinalis L. by heat-, microwave- and ultrasound-assisted extraction techniques: A comparative study through response surface analysis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 186, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Barrera Vázquez, M.F.; Andreatta, A.E.; Martini, R.E.; Núñez Montoya, S.C.; Cabrera, J.L.; Comini, L.R. Optimization of Pretreatment with Microwaves Prior the Pressurized Hot Water Extraction of Anthraquinones from Heterophyllaea Pustulata, Using Doehlert Experimental Design. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2020, 155, 10855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nie, J.; Chen, D.; Ye, J.; Lu, Y.; Dai, Z. Optimization and Kinetic Modeling of Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Fucoxanthin from Edible Brown Algae Sargassum Fusiforme Using Green Solvents. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 77, 105671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mohd Fuad, F.; Mohd Nadzir, M. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Asiaticoside from Centella Asiatica Using Betaine-Based Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2023, 192, 116069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, J.; Li, N.; Wang, C.; Chang, T.; Jiang, H. Ultrasound-Homogenization-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Coconut Mesocarp: Optimization Study. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 78, 105739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lanjekar, K.J.; Rathod, V.K. Green Extraction of Glycyrrhizic Acid from Glycyrrhiza Glabra Using Choline Chloride Based Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADESs). Process Biochem. 2021, 102, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zheng, B.; Yuan, Y.; Xiang, J.; Jin, W.; Johnson, J.B.; Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Luo, D. Green Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Foxtail Millet Bran by Ultrasonic-Assisted Deep Eutectic Solvent Extraction: Optimization, Comparison and Bioactivities. LWT 2022, 154, 112740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhu, C.P.; Zhai, X.C.; Li, L.Q.; Wu, X.X.; Li, B. Response Surface Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Polysaccharides Extraction from Pomegranate Peel. Food Chem. 2015, 177, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Shi, H.; Yu, J.; Huang, G.; Huang, H. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and Properties of Polysaccharide from Ginkgo Biloba Leaves. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 93, 106295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, H.; Deng, Z.; Wu, T.; Liu, R.; Loewen, S.; Tsao, R. Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Phenolics with Maximal Antioxidant Activities in Tomatoes. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 928–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, Y.C.; Li, J.; Zu, Y.G.; Fu, Y.J.; Luo, M.; Wu, N.; Liu, X.L. Optimisation of Microwave-Assisted Enzymatic Extraction of Corilagin and Geraniin from Geranium Sibiricum Linne and Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dahmoune, F.; Nayak, B.; Moussi, K.; Remini, H.; Madani, K. Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Myrtus Communis L. Leaves. Food Chem. 2015, 166, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Weremfo, A.; Adulley, F.; Dabie, K.; Abassah-Oppong, S.; Peprah-Yamoah, E. Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Antioxidants from Turkey Berry (Solanum torvum Sw) Fruits Using Response Surface Methodology. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2022, 30, 100387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shahidi, S.A. Effect of Solvent Type on Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Antioxidant Compounds from Ficaria Kochii: Optimization by Response Surface Methodology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 163, 112981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Munekata, P.E.S.; Alcántara, C.; Žugčić, T.; Abdelkebir, R.; Collado, M.C.; García-Pérez, J.V.; Jambrak, A.R.; Gavahian, M.; Barba, F.J.; Lorenzo, J.M. Impact of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and Solvent Composition on Bioactive Compounds and in Vitro Biological Activities of Thyme and Rosemary. Food Res. Int. 2020, 134, 109242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lefebvre, T.; Destandau, E.; Lesellier, E. Sequential Extraction of Carnosic Acid, Rosmarinic Acid and Pigments (Carotenoids and Chlorophylls) from Rosemary by Online Supercritical Fluid Extraction-Supercritical Fluid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1639, 461709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tzima, K.; Brunton, N.P.; Lyng, J.G.; Frontuto, D.; Rai, D.K. The Effect of Pulsed Electric Field as a Pre-Treatment Step in Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Fresh Rosemary and Thyme by-Products. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 69, 102644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Razola-Díaz, M.D.C.; Guerra-Hernández, E.J.; Rodríguez-Pérez, C.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; García-Villanova, B.; Verardo, V. Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction via Sonotrode of Phenolic Compounds from Orange by-Products. Foods 2021, 10, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Verni, M.; Pontonio, E.; Krona, A.; Jacob, S.; Pinto, D.; Rinaldi, F.; Verardo, V.; Díaz-de-Cerio, E.; Coda, R.; Rizello, C.G. Bioprocessing of Brewers’ Spent Grain Enhances Its Antioxidant Activity: Characterization of Phenolic Compounds and Bioactive Peptides. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 05286 g001 550
Figure 1. Base peak chromatogram of the compounds identified in the basil leaf. Numbers 1–20 correspond to the peaks in Table 1.
Figure 1. Base peak chromatogram of the compounds identified in the basil leaf. Numbers 1–20 correspond to the peaks in Table 1.
Molecules 28 05286 g001
Molecules 28 05286 g002 550
Figure 2. Response surface graphs (a–i) showing the combined effects of the independent factors: ethanol/water (v/v), time (min), and amplitude (%) for the responses of rosmarinic acid (a–c), the sum of phenolic acids (d–f), and the sum of phenolic compounds (g–i) expressed as µg/g d.w.
Figure 2. Response surface graphs (a–i) showing the combined effects of the independent factors: ethanol/water (v/v), time (min), and amplitude (%) for the responses of rosmarinic acid (a–c), the sum of phenolic acids (d–f), and the sum of phenolic compounds (g–i) expressed as µg/g d.w.
Molecules 28 05286 g002
Table
Table 1. Identified compounds in Ocimum basilicum leaf extracts by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS.
Table 1. Identified compounds in Ocimum basilicum leaf extracts by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS.
PeakTime (min)Experimental m/zCalculated m/zError (ppm)Score (%)Molecular
Formula		m/z in the Source
Fragments		Compound Name
10.42133.0139133.01371.5100C4H6O5-Malic acid
20.57191.0551191.0556−2.698.91C7H12O6111.0082Quinic acid isomer a
31.09191.0549191.0556−3.7100C7H12O6133.0282Quinic acid isomer b
41.19175.0599175.0606−4.099.95C7H12O5133.0271Isopropylmalic acid isomer a
52.15175.0605175.0606−0.6100C7H12O5133.0293Isopropylmalic acid isomer b
64.30179.0340179.0344−2.2100C9H8O4133.0287Caffeic acid
75.43387.1653387.1655−0.5100C18H28O9207.1017; 179.0712Tuberonic acid glucoside
86.33855.2519855.2559−4.795.08C38H48O22179.0699; 161.0605Sesaminol triglucoside
98.29473.0705473.0720−3.299.95C22H18O12293.0287Chicoric acid isomer a
108.87359.0768359.07670.3100C18H16O8133.0292Rosmarinic acid isomer a
119.04609.1469609.14562.1100C27H30O16300.0279Quercetin-rutinoside
129.51473.0740473.07204.299.17C22H18O12293.0308Chicoric acid isomer b
139.74359.0778359.07673.1100C18H16O8133.0289Rosmarinic acid isomer b
149.78717.1451717.1456−0.797.38C36H30O16161.0246Salvianolic acid
1510.21593.1498593.1506−1.399.96C27H30O15285.0395Luteolin hexoside deoxyhexoside
1613.38803.3701803.37010.0100C38H60O18503.3382; 357.1906; 315.1796; 161.0463Stevioside
1713.58313.0707313.0712−1.6100C17H14O6161.0235Cirsimaritin isomer a
1813.82313.0702313.0712−3.2100C17H14O6161.0233Cirsimaritin isomer b
1914.74345.1696345.1702−1.7100C20H26O5283.1692Rosmanol
2014.92491.0983491.09781.0100C26H20O10179.0345Isosalvianolic acid
Table
Table 2. Experimental Box–Behnken design of the conditions of extraction (independent factors) and the experimental results (response variables) obtained, expressed with the average ± standard deviation.
Table 2. Experimental Box–Behnken design of the conditions of extraction (independent factors) and the experimental results (response variables) obtained, expressed with the average ± standard deviation.
Independent FactorsResponse Variables
X1X2X3Y1Y2Y3
RunEthanol/
Water (v/v)		Amplitude (%)Time (min)Rosmarinic Acid (µg/g d.w.)The Sum of Phenolic
Acids (µg/g d.w.)		The Sum of Phenolic
Compounds (µg/g d.w.)
120605206.59 ± 0.281053.93 ± 1.411091.82 ± 1.48
210060518.19 ± 0.0618.19 ± 0.0624.63 ± 0.09
3206045238.12 ± 0.321177.45 ± 1.561224.58 ± 1.64
41006045149.26 ± 0.21330.65 ± 0.50383.61 ± 0.60
5202025254.64 ± 0.341142.60 ± 1.501185.53 ± 1.58
610020258.26 ± 0.038.26 ± 0.038.44 ± 0.03
7201002561.24 ± 0.11570.75 ± 0.78580.83 ± 0.80
81001002533.92 ± 0.0792.39 ± 0.20142.17 ± 0.29
960205317.40 ± 0.411302.98 ± 1.691358.20 ± 1.78
10602045253.07 ± 0.341108.33 ± 1.471149.89 ± 1.55
11601005412.44 ± 0.531396.61 ± 1.821459.35 ± 1.93
126010045142.60 ± 0.21863.03 ± 1.17909.48 ± 1.26
13606025420.13 ± 0.461458.90 ± 1.871559.45 ± 2.04
14606025406.35 ± 0.531419.25 ± 1.561522.60 ± 2.03
15606025415.72 ± 0.511437.80 ± 1.231545.94 ± 1.94
Table
Table 3. Regression coefficients and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the model for the response variables for Ocimum basilicum.
Table 3. Regression coefficients and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the model for the response variables for Ocimum basilicum.
Y1Y2Y3
Regression CoefficientsRosmarinic Acid
(µg/g d.w.)		The Sum of Phenolic Acids
(µg/g d.w.)		The Sum of Phenolic Compounds
(µg/g d.w.)
Effectp-ValueEffectp-ValueEffectp-Value
β0254.740.0004 *755.430.0001 *793.210.0000 *
Linear
β1−226.900.0035 *−851.320.0003 *−856.610.0003 *
β2−75.480.0305 *−187.850.0061 *−180.200.0059 *
β31.660.913323.950.246737.550.1140
Crossed
β12149.790.0143 *327.990.0036 *369.210.0025 *
β137.740.710894.470.0414 *113.110.0261 *
β23−134.620.0176 *−169.470.0134 *−170.780.0117 *
Quadratic
β11267.630.0012 *753.920.0002 *800.740.0001 *
β2266.230.0197 *231.240.0020 *262.670.0014 *
β33−22.820.136539.680.061560.760.0246 *
R20.98550.99800.9967
p-model0.0010 *0.0000 *0.0000 *
p lack of fit0.35250.24670.1140
* Significant at α ≤ 0.05
Table
Table 4. Optimized conditions for UAE via a sonotrode for Ocimum basilicum leaves.
Table 4. Optimized conditions for UAE via a sonotrode for Ocimum basilicum leaves.
Optimal Conditions
Ethanol/water (v/v)50
Amplitude (%)50
Time (min)5
Rosmarinic acidSum of phenolic acidsSum of phenolic compounds
Predicted value (µg/g d.w.)529.97 ± 59.371657.15 ± 86.091749.04 ± 80.91
Obtained value (µg/g d.w.)531.00 ± 2.651695.33 ± 5.031762.00 ± 19.29
CV (%)0.141.610.52
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aloisio, C.; Razola-Díaz, M.d.C.; Aznar-Ramos, M.J.; Longhi, M.R.; Andreatta, A.E.; Verardo, V. Optimization of the Extraction Conditions of Bioactive Compounds from Ocimum basilicum Leaves Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction via a Sonotrode. Molecules 2023, 28, 5286. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135286

AMA Style

Aloisio C, Razola-Díaz MdC, Aznar-Ramos MJ, Longhi MR, Andreatta AE, Verardo V. Optimization of the Extraction Conditions of Bioactive Compounds from Ocimum basilicum Leaves Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction via a Sonotrode. Molecules. 2023; 28(13):5286. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aloisio, Carolina, María del Carmen Razola-Díaz, María José Aznar-Ramos, Marcela R. Longhi, Alfonsina E. Andreatta, and Vito Verardo. 2023. "Optimization of the Extraction Conditions of Bioactive Compounds from Ocimum basilicum Leaves Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction via a Sonotrode" Molecules 28, no. 13: 5286. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135286

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop