Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (25)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = DSAEK

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 457 KB  
Article
Triple Procedure Long-Term Outcomes: Comparative Analysis of Penetrating Keratoplasty vs. DSAEK Combined with Cataract Surgery
by Dominika Szkodny, Adam Wylęgała, Agnieszka Szkaradek, Magdalena Kijonka, Magdalena Nandzik and Edward Wylęgała
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5670; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165670 - 11 Aug 2025
Viewed by 304
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study assessed outcomes between penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) when combined with cataract surgery as part of the triple procedure. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 727 triple procedures (525 PK and 202 DSAEK) from 2007–2023. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study assessed outcomes between penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) when combined with cataract surgery as part of the triple procedure. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 727 triple procedures (525 PK and 202 DSAEK) from 2007–2023. Graft survival, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression were used for survival and prognostic analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference in survival was found (PK—42 months; DSAEK—47 months). DSAEK had better visual acuity improvement and refractive stability. PK had higher astigmatism and variability in refractive error. Conclusions: While graft survival was comparable, DSAEK offers superior visual rehabilitation, supporting its use when refractive predictability is important. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Clinical Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1146 KB  
Article
Non-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (nDSAEK) for Late Endothelial Failure After Mushroom Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Visual and Anatomical Outcomes
by Antonio Moramarco, Natalie di Geronimo, Marian Sergiu Zimbru, Arianna Grendele, Francesco Biagini, Maurizio Mete, Vito Romano and Luigi Fontana
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5568; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155568 - 7 Aug 2025
Viewed by 264
Abstract
Background: Mushroom penetrating keratoplasty (MPK) is an alternative to traditional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) that offers improved graft survival and reduced immunological rejection. However, MPK grafts may still experience endothelial failure over time. This study evaluates the outcomes of non-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial [...] Read more.
Background: Mushroom penetrating keratoplasty (MPK) is an alternative to traditional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) that offers improved graft survival and reduced immunological rejection. However, MPK grafts may still experience endothelial failure over time. This study evaluates the outcomes of non-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (nDSAEK) as a surgical approach for endothelial decompensation following MPK. Methods: A monocentric, retrospective study was conducted at the Ophthalmology Department of Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, including patients who underwent nDSAEK for endothelial failure after MPK between 2022 and 2024. Pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were assessed. Results: Eighteen eyes from 18 patients (mean age: 39.94 years) were included. Primary MPK indications were post-keratitis leucoma (77.7%), traumatic scarring (16.7%), and keratoconus (5.6%). At one year, mean BCVA improved significantly from 1.40 ± 0.42 logMAR to 0.46 ± 0.19 logMAR (p < 0.05), and mean CCT decreased from 721 ± 70.12 µm to 616 ± 52.80 µm (p < 0.05). The mean postoperative ECD was 1748 ± 100 cells/mm2, with lower eye values requiring re-bubbling. No immunological rejection or graft failures were reported. Conclusions: nDSAEK is a promising treatment for MPK endothelial failure, demonstrating good visual and anatomical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 943 KB  
Article
Impact of Microkeratome Dissection Parameters on Textural Interface Opacities in DSAEK Grafts
by Marina S. Chatzea, George D. Kymionis, Dionysios G. Vakalopoulos, Robert C. O’Brien, Daniella Mora, Katrina Llanes, Elizabeth Fout, William Buras, Concetta Triglia, Rahul S. Tonk and Sonia H. Yoo
Diagnostics 2025, 15(13), 1608; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131608 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 368
Abstract
Background: Textural interface opacities (TIOs) following Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) have become a significant postoperative concern. Studies have explored possible links such as stromal irregularities and viscoelastic usage, but the exact cause of TIOs remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate the [...] Read more.
Background: Textural interface opacities (TIOs) following Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) have become a significant postoperative concern. Studies have explored possible links such as stromal irregularities and viscoelastic usage, but the exact cause of TIOs remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between microkeratome dissection parameters and the development of textural interface opacities in DSAEK grafts utilizing the “M-TIO” grading scale for standardized assessment. Methods: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of DSAEK-processed corneal grafts, prepared with the same microkeratome and technique for transplantation at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, underwent blinded analysis using a newly developed grading scale termed “M-TIO”. This analysis aimed to evaluate and categorize the occurrence of TIO, explore its potential correlation with graft characteristics prior to DSAEK preparation, and assess specific stages of the DSAEK dissection process. Data collected included the size of the microkeratome head used, the difference between the head and the actual stromal cut, and the difference between the pre-cut graft thickness and post-cut DSAEK lenticule thickness. Results: The study retrospectively included 422 donor corneas transplanted from 2019 to 2023. Variables associated with TIO in the final multivariable ordinal logistic model included the difference between the pre-cut graft thickness and the post-cut DSAEK lenticule thickness (OR: 1.57 [99% CI: 1.22 to 2.06] per 50 µm) and microkeratome head (OR: 6.95 [99% CI: 1.04 to 36.60] 300 µm, OR: 4.39 [99% CI: 0.76 to 19.00] 350 µm, and OR: 18.86 [99% CI: 2.35 to 175.91] 400 µm vs 450 or 500 µm, respectively). Conclusions: This study identified a statistically significant association between TIOs and the microkeratome DSAEK preparation, proposing several factors that could help prevent its occurrence. Specifically, creating an ultra-thin DSAEK lenticule from an initially thick graft using a smaller microkeratome head with the slow single-pass technique may increase the risk of TIOs. In contrast, utilizing a larger microkeratome head can improve stromal thickness consistency, reduce technical challenges during graft preparation, and lower the risk of TIOs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Coherence Tomography in Diagnosis of Ophthalmology Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 896 KB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Corneal Morphological and Optical Parameters in Predicting DSAEK Surgery Outcome
by Antonela Geber, Sanja Masnec, Miro Kalauz, Iva Bešlić, Ivan Škegro, Dina Lešin Gaćina, Sonja Jandroković, Ana Meter and Tomislav Kuzman
Medicina 2025, 61(6), 1022; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061022 - 31 May 2025
Viewed by 438
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is a widely used surgical technique for treating corneal endothelial dysfunctions such as Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). This study aimed to investigate the association between postoperative visual [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is a widely used surgical technique for treating corneal endothelial dysfunctions such as Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). This study aimed to investigate the association between postoperative visual acuity and various corneal morphological and optical parameters, including corneal densitometry (CD) and higher-order aberrations (HOAs), measured using the Pentacam (OCULUS Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), as well as graft thickness, which was assessed by anterior segment optic coherence tomography (AS-OCT), (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA), and corneal thickness, assessed by both AS-OCT and Pentacam. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study included 17 eyes from 13 patients who underwent DSAEK. Data on preoperative visual acuity were collected, while postoperative parameters were assessed during follow-up visits. Corneal measurements included the total corneal and corneal graft thickness, corneal densitometry in 20 defined subregions, and corneal higher-order aberrations. Associations between these parameters and postoperative visual acuity were evaluated using nonparametric statistical tests. Results: The postoperative visual acuity improved significantly (p < 0.001). Strong correlations were found between poorer visual acuity and higher CD values. The strongest correlations with visual acuity were found for CD 2–6 mm total (Rho = 0.795; p < 0.001), CD central 2–6 mm (Rho = 0.791; p < 0.001), and CD central 0–2 mm (Rho = 0.730; p < 0.001). Significant associations were also observed with anterior and posterior HOAs (Rho = 0.624, p = 0.01; and Rho = 0.556, p = 0.02, respectively). No correlation was found between visual outcomes and graft thickness measured by AS-OCT (Rho = 0.051; p = 0.85), nor with total corneal thickness measured by AS-OCT (Rho = −0.227; p = 0.38) or Pentacam (Rho = −0.369; p = 0.14). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CD and HOAs are more strongly associated with postoperative visual acuity after DSAEK than traditionally monitored parameters such as graft or corneal thickness. The results highlight the value of detailed corneal imaging and support the use of advanced optical diagnostics in postoperative evaluation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Corneal Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 290 KB  
Review
A Review of Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Interventions in Patients with Pre-Existing Glaucoma
by Keya Jafari, Zahra Ashena and Magdalena Niestrata
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3534; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103534 - 18 May 2025
Viewed by 1034
Abstract
Glaucoma is known to impair the function of corneal endothelial cells for various reasons, which increases the likelihood of patients with glaucoma requiring endothelial keratoplasty. Among the techniques available, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) each present [...] Read more.
Glaucoma is known to impair the function of corneal endothelial cells for various reasons, which increases the likelihood of patients with glaucoma requiring endothelial keratoplasty. Among the techniques available, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) each present unique challenges, particularly for those with a history of glaucoma surgery. We conducted a literature review to evaluate the outcomes of DMEK and DSAEK in glaucoma patients, focusing on factors such as visual prognosis, graft survival, glaucoma exacerbations, and any necessary surgical modifications. The findings indicate that DMEK tends to provide better visual outcomes compared to DSAEK, with a lower rate of steroid responders due to a shorter postoperative steroid regimen. While DMEK has shown a higher incidence of graft detachment and a lower rate of graft rejection, compared to DSAEK, in the general population, the specific data regarding these outcomes in glaucoma patients remain scarce in the existing literature. Overall, the survival rates of both grafting techniques do not show significant differences within the glaucoma patient population. To draw more definitive conclusions about graft survival between the two methods, a greater number of comparative studies with longer follow-up periods is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
9 pages, 764 KB  
Article
Screening and Grading of Textural Interface Opacities in DSAEK Grafts with the M-TIO Scale for Predicting Visual Outcomes
by Marina S. Chatzea, George D. Kymionis, Dionysios G. Vakalopoulos, Robert C. O’Brien, Daniella Mora, Katrina Llanes, Elizabeth Fout, William Buras, Concetta Triglia, Rahul S. Tonk and Sonia H. Yoo
Diagnostics 2025, 15(10), 1241; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101241 - 14 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 556
Abstract
Background: Textural Interface Opacities (TIOs) following Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) have become a notable postoperative concern. Several studies have attempted to identify associations between TIO development and intraoperative factors, including fluid dynamics, irregular stromal surfaces, viscoelastic usage, and recipient immunological [...] Read more.
Background: Textural Interface Opacities (TIOs) following Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) have become a notable postoperative concern. Several studies have attempted to identify associations between TIO development and intraoperative factors, including fluid dynamics, irregular stromal surfaces, viscoelastic usage, and recipient immunological responses. Despite these efforts, the precise etiology of TIO remains uncertain. TIO has not been considered predictable in the preoperative setting. Its detection has relied exclusively on slit-lamp biomicroscopy, a subjective approach lacking standardized diagnostic criteria, which limits diagnostic reliability and is highly susceptible to interobserver variability. Methods: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images of DSAEK-processed corneal grafts, prepared using the same microkeratome and technique for transplantation at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, underwent blinded analysis using a newly developed grading scale termed “M-TIO”. This analysis focused on DSAEK-processed grafts OCT images to evaluate and categorize the occurrence of TIO and assess the final visual acuity of the patients at the 1-year postoperative evaluation. Results: Based on the results, the M-TIO grading scale demonstrated strong predictive value, with higher grades on OCT of DSAEK lenticules consistently associated with worse postoperative visual acuity. The study included 221 donor corneas transplanted from 2019 to 2023. Greater TIO based on the “M-TIO” grading scale was associated with worse recipient logMAR VA (Mean 0.151 [99% CI: 0.077 to 0.225] for corneas with no TIO, increased to 0.680 [99% CI: 0.532 to 0.828] for corneas with the greatest TIO grade). These findings highlight the clinical utility of the M-TIO scale as an objective and reliable preoperative tool for assessing graft quality and predicting postoperative visual outcomes. Conclusions: This study introduces the “M-TIO” grading scale, which provides a standardized and objective method for evaluating Textural Interface Opacities in DSAEK grafts prior to transplantation. Our results demonstrate a clear association between the severity of TIO as graded by the M-TIO scale, and postoperative visual outcomes, with higher TIO grades correlating with worse visual acuity, emphasizing its value in improving graft selection, and clinical decision-making in DSAEK. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Coherence Tomography in Diagnosis of Ophthalmology Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1405 KB  
Review
Review of the Literature: Surgery Indications for Fuchs’ Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
by Moïse Tourabaly, Juliette Knoeri, Cristina Georgeon and Vincent Borderie
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2365; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072365 - 29 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1198
Abstract
Objectives: To provide an overview of the preoperative indications for endothelial graft in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Methods: A comprehensive database search without date restrictions was performed in PubMed. Keywords included Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial [...] Read more.
Objectives: To provide an overview of the preoperative indications for endothelial graft in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Methods: A comprehensive database search without date restrictions was performed in PubMed. Keywords included Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), corneal keratoplasty, preoperative visual acuity, preoperative central corneal thickness, and densitometry. Articles aiming to describe or evaluate preoperative indications for endothelial keratoplasty were considered eligible and were included in this review. Results: The indications for surgery in FECD are disparate between the different studies. The tendency is to operate on patients earlier to obtain a better postoperative visual acuity at 1 year. The surgical decision is based on a number of arguments (visual acuity, CCT, densitometry). A preoperative visual acuity worse than 20/40 is generally considered a surgical indication for DMEK, based on current literature. Conclusions: Surgical decisions for Fuchs’ dystrophy should be individualized, guided by preoperative visual acuity, corneal OCT, and advanced imaging, with future risk scores potentially refining the timing of intervention to optimize outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Keratoplasty)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2068 KB  
Article
Outcomes of Sutureless Small Incision Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Study
by Le Xuan Cung, Luong Thi Anh Thu, Duong Mai Nga and Pham Ngoc Dong
Transplantology 2025, 6(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology6010004 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 744
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the outcomes of sutureless small incision Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK-SI) for treating corneal endothelial decompensation. Methods and Analysis: This retrospective study reviewed patients with corneal endothelial decompensation who underwent DSAEK-SI between January 2018 and June 2021 at [...] Read more.
Background: This study evaluated the outcomes of sutureless small incision Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK-SI) for treating corneal endothelial decompensation. Methods and Analysis: This retrospective study reviewed patients with corneal endothelial decompensation who underwent DSAEK-SI between January 2018 and June 2021 at the Vietnam National Eye Hospital. All patients were followed for at least one year postoperatively. The endothelial graft was inserted into the anterior chamber through a 2.8 mm main corneal incision using a Busin glide. The normal pressure air tamponade of the anterior chamber was applied to attach the graft to the recipient bed. The small incision required no sutures, and no need to remove part of the air from the anterior chamber. This ensured that the surgery ended immediately after the air tamponade, without having to wait for 15 min like with regular DSAEK. The patients were instructed to lie supine for at least 6 h postoperatively. Patients with cataracts underwent combined phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation with DSAEK-SI. Results: Sixty eyes from sixty patients were enrolled. The success rate of the surgery was 93.3%. Postoperatively, the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) improved from 20/3600 to 20/400 at discharge and reached 20/100 at 12 months. Mild astigmatism (0.5D to 2D) was observed in 91.8% of patients, with a mean cylinder of 0.9 ± 0.4D at 12 months. The endothelial cell loss rate after 12 months was 34.6 ± 16%. No graft dislocations or detachments were recorded. Conclusions: The sutureless DSAEK-SI technique with a 2.8 mm incision is a modified technique that achieves high success rates and potentially reduces surgical manipulation and complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Living Donors and Mini Invasive Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1465 KB  
Case Report
Posterior Dislocation of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty—A Case Report and Review
by Valentino de Ruvo, Alfonso Strianese, Lily Chacra, Luca Rossetti, Fabio Patelli and Paolo Fogagnolo
Complications 2025, 2(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2010001 - 3 Jan 2025
Viewed by 910
Abstract
In this study, we describe a case of graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and review the risk factors and complications of posterior dislocation. A 70-year-old female with disruption of the iris–lens diaphragm experienced DSAEK graft [...] Read more.
In this study, we describe a case of graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and review the risk factors and complications of posterior dislocation. A 70-year-old female with disruption of the iris–lens diaphragm experienced DSAEK graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity during air re-bubbling at 1 week postoperatively. The corneal opacity hindered adequate visualization of the vitreous cavity for the immediate retrieval of the graft. Five days after re-bubbling, vitrectomy and corneal tissue removal was performed using a temporary Eckardt keratoprosthesis, and penetrating keratoplasty was subsequently performed. Two weeks after graft removal, a retinal detachment occurred. Silicon oil was used as a tamponade to reattach the retina. Three months after the last procedure, the retina was attached, and the cornea was clear. Posterior dislocation of DSAEK graft is a rare complication. A disrupted iris–lens diaphragm and previous vitrectomy are the main risk factors. Severe vision loss is more likely to occur when corneal tissue removal is delayed. In cases of delayed removal, it is advisable to take precautions to prevent possible retinal detachment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complications in Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 831 KB  
Article
Endothelial Keratoplasty Following Glaucoma Filtration Surgery: A UK Tertiary Eye Care Referral Centre Experience
by Francesco Aiello, Francesco Matarazzo, Maria Phylactou, Kirithika Muthusamy and Vincenzo Maurino
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6097; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206097 - 13 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1223
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering surgery. Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, we analysed postoperative visual acuity and intraocular [...] Read more.
Purpose: To compare the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering surgery. Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, we analysed postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure, graft survival, rate of graft detachment and/or dislocation, number of rebubbling and/or graft repositioning procedures, and graft rejection or failure (primary and secondary). Results: Sixteen eyes with DMEK and 80 eyes with DSAEK with previous glaucoma surgery were studied. The results were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant differences in postoperative visual acuity were found between the two groups at any stage of the follow-up. Intraocular pressure was lower in the DMEK group at the follow-up stage of 3 (p = 0.0022) and 12 months (p = 0.0480). Visually significant graft detachment was recorded in 31.3% and 22.5% of DMEK and DSAEK cases, respectively (p = 0.4541). All DMEK detachments (n = 5) were managed with slit-lamp rebubbling. Out of 18 graft detachments in the DSAEK group, 2 grafts were observed due to small graft detachment, 6 large graft detachments underwent rebubbling performed in the operating theatre, and 10 eyes needed primary graft repositioning for graft dislocation. Conclusions: DMEK is a feasible option to treat endothelial failure in complex eyes with previous glaucoma surgery. In the DMEK group, visual acuity outcomes and possibly postoperative intraocular pressure control were better compared with the DSAEK group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corneal Surgery: Latest Advances and Prospects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2910 KB  
Systematic Review
A Functional and Immunologic Point of View on Corneal Endothelial Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Sara Spelta, Alessandra Micera, Daniele Gaudenzi, Matteo Niutta, Pier Luigi Surico, Antonio De Vincentis, Marco Coassin and Antonio Di Zazzo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(12), 3431; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123431 - 12 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1463
Abstract
Background: To systematically review and meta-analyze the immunologic aspects and outcomes of various endothelial keratoplasty (EK) techniques, specifically comparing Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), Ultra-Thin Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK), and Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. [...] Read more.
Background: To systematically review and meta-analyze the immunologic aspects and outcomes of various endothelial keratoplasty (EK) techniques, specifically comparing Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), Ultra-Thin Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK), and Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Main outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 at 6 months after keratoplasty, rejection rate one year after surgery, BSCVA at last follow up, and postoperative immunomodulating regimen. Results: A higher proportion of DMEK patients achieved a BSCVA of 20/20 after 6 months. UT-DSAEK and DMEK showed similar rejection rates with a lower risk of re-bubbling for UT-DSAEK (4% vs. 20%). Conclusions: DMEK showed faster visual recovery than UT-DSAEK but a similar rejection rate and long-term visual acuity. One-year postoperative slow tapering steroid regimen has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on rejection risk and visual outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Corneal Regeneration and Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 306 KB  
Review
Post-Keratoplasty Microbial Keratitis in the Era of Lamellar Transplants—A Comprehensive Review
by Joanna Przybek-Skrzypecka, Katarzyna Samelska, Agata Joanna Ordon, Janusz Skrzypecki, Justyna Izdebska, Marta Kołątaj and Jacek P. Szaflik
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2326; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082326 - 17 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1475
Abstract
Microbial keratitis in a post-transplant cornea should be considered a distinct entity from microbial keratitis in a non-transplant cornea. Firstly, the use of immunosuppressive treatments and sutures in corneal transplants changes the etiology of keratitis. Secondly, corneal transplant has an impact on corneal [...] Read more.
Microbial keratitis in a post-transplant cornea should be considered a distinct entity from microbial keratitis in a non-transplant cornea. Firstly, the use of immunosuppressive treatments and sutures in corneal transplants changes the etiology of keratitis. Secondly, corneal transplant has an impact on corneal biomechanics and structure, which facilitates the spread of infection. Finally, the emergence of lamellar transplants has introduced a new form of keratitis known as interface keratitis. Given these factors, there is a clear need to update our understanding of and management strategies for microbial keratitis following corneal transplantation, especially in the era of lamellar transplants. To address this, a comprehensive review is provided, covering the incidence, risk factors, causes, and timing of microbial keratitis, as well as both clinical and surgical management approaches for its treatment in cases of penetrating and lamellar corneal transplants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
10 pages, 5108 KB  
Article
Donor Characteristics in Graft Detachment after Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy and Bullous Keratopathy
by Nicola Cardascia, Flavio Cassano, Valentina Pastore, Maria Gabriella La Tegola, Alessandra Sborgia, Francesco Boscia and Giovanni Alessio
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1593; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061593 - 11 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1391
Abstract
Background: Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) has been widely adopted to treat Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and Bullous keratopathy (BK). Graft detachment (GD) is one of the common earliest post-operatory complications, and it is usually recovered by Air Rebubbling (ARB). Methods: Retrospectively, we [...] Read more.
Background: Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) has been widely adopted to treat Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and Bullous keratopathy (BK). Graft detachment (GD) is one of the common earliest post-operatory complications, and it is usually recovered by Air Rebubbling (ARB). Methods: Retrospectively, we investigated predictive factors related to GD between January 2016 and March 2020, a pre-COVID era, in 72 patients, 72 eyes, and their donors’ lamellar characteristics, focusing on donor’s cause of death. The patients were divided according to the posterior lamellar keratoplasty technique adopted. Results: GD and consequent ARB were most common but not significantly prevalent in DMEK (p = 0.11). It was more common in FED for both surgical approaches. Only in BK treated with DSAEK were host steeper mean astigmatism (p = 0.03) and donors with smaller graft pre-cut diameters (p = 0.02) less likely to be related to GD. Regarding donor’s cause of death, only cardiovascular accident could be related to GD in BK treated with DMEK (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our study shows that the conventional match between pathology and corneal lenticule is not sufficient to prevent ARB. Donor’s cause of death can impair graft and host attachment. In particular, cardiovascular death may impair the efficiency of donors’ endothelial cells, inducing GD after DMEK in BK. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corneal Transplantation: Recent Advances and Current Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1491 KB  
Article
Changes in the Visual Field Test after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Advanced Glaucoma
by Noriko Toyokawa, Kaoru Araki-Sasaki, Hideya Kimura and Shinichiro Kuroda
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1431; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051431 - 1 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1150
Abstract
Background: To evaluate changes in the visual field (VF) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with advanced glaucoma and previous trabeculectomy. Methods: Changes in VF, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of glaucoma medications were [...] Read more.
Background: To evaluate changes in the visual field (VF) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with advanced glaucoma and previous trabeculectomy. Methods: Changes in VF, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of glaucoma medications were analyzed before and after DSAEK in 19 eyes. The VFs were evaluated using the 10-2 program of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and/or Goldmann perimetry (GP). Results: In nine eyes, the MD improved from −22.24 ± 6.5 dB to −18.36 ± 5.1 dB in HFA. In five out of nine eyes, postoperative MD improved >1 dB compared to preoperative MD. In GP testing, 10 out of 15 eyes showed an improvement, that is, greater than 20° in VF enlargement by the isopter of I-4e and/or new detection of a smaller or darker isopter. Overall, improvement in VF with the HFA and/or GP test was observed in 12/19 (63.2%) eyes after DSAEK. Postoperative BCVA improved by more than two lines in logMAR VA in 18 of 19 (94.7%) eyes. There were no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative IOP and the number of glaucoma medications. Conclusions: DSAEK may produce subjective improvement in the visual field as well as improved visual acuity, even in advanced glaucomatous eyes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Corneal and Ocular Surface Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 793 KB  
Article
Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study
by Antonio Ballesteros-Sánchez, Jorge Peraza-Nieves, Anna Casablanca-Piñera, Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-De-Mora, Saray Catalán-Coronado, Josep Torras-Sanvicens, Davide Borroni, José-María Sánchez-González and Carlos Rocha-De-Lossada
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(22), 7133; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227133 - 16 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1566
Abstract
Background: To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft–host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clarity and optical quality by measuring the light backscatter [...] Read more.
Background: To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft–host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clarity and optical quality by measuring the light backscatter from the cornea. Methods: Fifty-one eyes that received DMEK or DSAEK surgery for corneal endothelium dysfunction were evaluated. The primary endpoint included CD patterns at the graft–host interface, which were assessed by the Pentacam HR device at the center point of the corneal horizontal meridian (CDcentral), and at six points on the central circumference of the cornea (with a total diameter of 4 mm) (CDI,II,III,IV,V,VI). Secondary endpoints included the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and graft thickness (GT). All of the evaluations were performed at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure. Results: DMEK showed a significant overall CD reduction of −7.9 ± 8.5 grayscale unit (GSU) compared to DSAEK (p < 0.001). In addition, the DMEK group showed significantly lower CDCentral,I,II,III,IV,V,VI values at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure compared to the DSAEK group (p < 0.001). BCDVA, CCT and GT were in favor of the DMEK group with a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.35 LogMar, 552.2 ± 71.1 µm and 11.03 ± 1.4 µm, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CD patterns at the graft–host interface seem to be different depending on the endothelial keratoplasty procedure. This provides specific insight into CD changes in this critical region of surgery, which may provide a better understanding of the postoperative evolution of these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging in Ophthalmology—Volume II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop