Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = IB-IVUS

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 510 KB  
Article
Mid-Term Outcomes of EVAR in Hostile Neck Anatomy: Impact of Graft Adaptability on Type III Endoleak, Aortic Remodeling, and Distal Sealing
by Alessandra Fittipaldi, Chiara Barillà, Narayana Pipitò, Domenico Squillaci, Giovanni De Caridi and Filippo Benedetto
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 6226; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176226 - 3 Sep 2025
Viewed by 155
Abstract
Aim: Hostile aortic neck anatomy—characterized by short neck length, severe angulation, conical shape, and mural thrombus or calcifications—represents a major limitation to the durability and applicability of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). In response to these challenges, newer endografts with improved conformability [...] Read more.
Aim: Hostile aortic neck anatomy—characterized by short neck length, severe angulation, conical shape, and mural thrombus or calcifications—represents a major limitation to the durability and applicability of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). In response to these challenges, newer endografts with improved conformability have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of EVAR using the GORE EXCLUDER Conformable AAA Endoprosthesis (CEXC) (W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA) in patients with hostile neck anatomy, with specific attention to type III endoleak occurrence, aortic sac remodeling, and maintenance of distal sealing. Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on 50 consecutive patients treated with the CEXC endograft between October 2019 and September 2023. Patients included had either elective or urgent indications for EVAR and were evaluated preoperatively using CT angiography. Hostile neck criteria were defined according to the 2019 Delphi Consensus. Procedural variables, imaging follow-up, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary endpoints were technical and clinical success, while secondary outcomes included endoleak rates, aneurysm sac evolution, and reintervention-free survival. Results: Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases, with a clinical success rate of 98%. No type Ia, Ib, or III endoleaks were observed at a median follow-up of 23 months. Sac shrinkage (>5 mm reduction) occurred in 70% of patients, and distal sealing was preserved in 100% of cases. One perioperative death occurred in an emergency setting, and no late reinterventions or aneurysm-related mortalities were reported. The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and floppy guidewires contributed to precise deployment and sealing in angulated anatomies. Conclusions: The CEXC endograft proved to be a safe and effective option for EVAR in patients with hostile aortic anatomy, ensuring durable proximal and distal sealing, promoting favorable sac remodeling, and preventing type III endoleaks. These findings support the use of CEXC in anatomically complex settings, as long as procedures are meticulously planned and guided by appropriate intraoperative imaging and deployment techniques. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 4291 KB  
Review
Innovations in Intracoronary Imaging: Present Clinical Practices and Future Outlooks
by Andreas Mitsis, Christos Eftychiou, Nikolaos P. E. Kadoglou, Konstantinos C. Theodoropoulos, Efstratios Karagiannidis, Athina Nasoufidou, Antonios Ziakas, Stergios Tzikas and George Kassimis
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4086; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144086 - 12 Jul 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2789
Abstract
Engaging intracoronary imaging (IC) techniques such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography enables the precise description of vessel architecture. These imaging modalities have well-established roles in providing guidance and optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. Furthermore, IC is increasingly recognized for its [...] Read more.
Engaging intracoronary imaging (IC) techniques such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography enables the precise description of vessel architecture. These imaging modalities have well-established roles in providing guidance and optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. Furthermore, IC is increasingly recognized for its diagnostic capabilities, as it has the unique capacity to reveal vessel wall characteristics that may not be apparent through angiography alone. This manuscript thoroughly reviews the contemporary landscape of IC in clinical practice. Focused on current methodologies, the review explores the utility and advancements in IC techniques. Emphasizing their role in clarifying coronary pathophysiology, guiding PCI, and optimizing patient outcomes, the manuscript critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of each modality. Additionally, the integration of IC into routine clinical workflows and its impact on decision-making processes are discussed. By synthesizing the latest evidence, this review provides valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals involved in the dynamic field of interventional cardiology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop