Search Results (5,288)

Background/Objectives: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a liver injury characterized by the dysregulation of immune responses. Current options for AIH have limitations that highlight the urgent need to investigate alternative or adjunct therapeutic strategies for its management. We aimed to explore the protective effects of fasudil against concanavalin A (Con A)-induced AIH in mice. Con A resulted in significant hepatic damage, evidenced by dysregulation in liver function biomarkers, marked inflammatory cell infiltration, and hepatocellular degeneration. Methods: The pretreatment of mice with fasudil (10 and 25 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) for 7 days resulted in a significant ameliorative effect on these alterations in a dose-dependent manner. Fasudil treatment was associated with suppression of the RhoA/Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (ROCK) pathway and concomitant downregulation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). Results: These changes were accompanied by reduced macrophage activation and the reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, as evidenced by decreased nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon gamma (INF-γ), and interleukin-17A (IL-17A). Moreover, it significantly limited the cluster of differentiation (CD)4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration, thereby modulating adaptive immune amplification. Conclusions: Accordingly, fasudil restored redox homeostasis and mitigated hepatocellular death by rebalancing apoptotic regulators, normalizing the expression of B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) while reducing the expression of BCL-2-associated X protein (BAX) and caspase-3 activation. Subsequently, fasudil improved liver function profiles and preserved hepatic architecture. Our results demonstrate that fasudil has potent immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-apoptotic effects in AIH. Its protective effects are associated with the suppression of RhoA/ROCK and TLR4/NF-κB signaling, supporting further investigation into the contribution of these pathways to the therapeutic actions of fasudil in AIH. Full article

Background: Squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) share squamous differentiation and may engage the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway, although their causes, biology, and treatment differ by anatomical site. We evaluated tumor response, short-term survival, and grade 3–4 adverse events after neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint blockade, with or without chemotherapy, followed by surgery. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registries was conducted from inception to October 2024. Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating neoadjuvant immunotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, before surgery in patients with SCC were included. In mixed-histology studies, data were eligible only when SCC outcomes could be extracted separately. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with random-effects models. Results: A total of 44 studies involving 2586 patients with six anatomical SCC groups were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59–0.80), clinical complete response (cCR) rate was 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10–0.28), and pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.27–0.34). The pooled 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79–0.86), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75–0.92), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90–0.93), respectively. The pooled incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.14–0.23). Because the PD-L1 subgroup contained only one study for most outcomes, checkpoint-target subgroup findings were considered exploratory. Conclusions: Existing predominantly single-arm evidence suggests antitumor activity of neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint blockade, with or without chemotherapy, in selected patients with resectable SCC. Because esophageal SCC accounted for most studies and clinical heterogeneity was substantial, these pooled proportions should not be interpreted as comparative effects or as evidence of uniform benefit across SCC sites. Full article

Cancer remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, with oxidative stress playing a central role in its pathogenesis, progression, and response to therapy. Nutrition has emerged as a modifiable factor capable of influencing redox homeostasis, thereby contributing to both cancer prevention and therapeutic outcomes. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on dietary patterns, specific nutrients, and bioactive compounds that modulate oxidative stress and are associated with reduced cancer risk and improved response to treatment. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, covering the period from 2002 to 2025 to capture contemporary dietary approaches and clinical evidence. Eligible studies addressed nutrient compounds, dietary strategies, obesity, gut microbiota, conventional cancer therapies, and clinical outcomes, with particular emphasis on mechanisms related to oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune modulation. Epidemiological evidence consistently supports the protective role of plant-based dietary patterns and reduced intake of red and processed meat, partly due to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Nutrients such as dietary fiber, polyphenols, and omega-3 fatty acids are associated with decreased oxidative damage, improved immune responses, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy across multiple tumor types, including colorectal, breast, lung, and ovarian cancers, as well as glioblastoma. Emerging data also suggest that dietary interventions, including ketogenic diets and fasting, may influence tumor metabolism and redox balance, potentially increasing sensitivity to conventional therapies. The gut microbiota has been identified as a key mediator linking diet, oxidative stress, and cancer-related pathways. Although current evidence supports the role of nutritional strategies in targeting oxidative stress for cancer prevention and treatment, further large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to clarify their impact on survival and treatment efficacy. The integration of nutritional counseling into oncology practice represents a cost-effective, accessible, and patient-centered approach with the potential to modulate oxidative stress and improve clinical outcomes. Full article

Cancer progression is driven by early dysregulation of the immune system and tumor-intrinsic mechanisms. Hypoxia, lactate accumulation and IL-6 signaling induce highly overlapping tumor-promoting effects, including angiogenesis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metastasis, immune evasion and treatment resistance, suggesting that these pathways interact and amplify one another. This parallel activation complicates therapeutic targeting, as inhibition of one pathway may be compensated for by another. Increased proteolytic activity emerges early during tumor development and profoundly alters immune regulation. We recently identified a protease-generated albumin fragment, the IL-6-inducing factor (IL-6IF), which triggers pathological IL-6 production. IL-6 in turn enhances both HIF-1α expression and nuclear translocation, promotes glycolysis and lactate production, and forms positive feedback loops with STAT3 and multiple signaling pathways. Together, these mechanisms integrate into a self-sustaining IL-6/HIF-1α/STAT3 axis that drives tumor progression and suppresses anti-tumor immunity. The strong overlap among IL-6, its enhancing loops and hypoxia-driven mechanisms highlights IL-6 as a central regulator of metabolic and immunological reprogramming in cancer. However, a broad IL-6 blockade can impair physiological immune function. Selective inhibition of IL-6IF offers a novel strategy to prevent pathological IL-6 production while preserving physiological IL-6-dependent immune function required for effective tumor control. Reducing pathologically enhanced IL-6 synthesis by targeting IL-6IF, therefore, might represent a potential therapeutic approach to disrupt multiple tumor-promoting pathways simultaneously and may thereby improve responsiveness to cancer immunotherapy. Full article

Metabolic reprogramming constitutes a fundamental hallmark of malignancy, orchestrating a hostile tumor microenvironment (TME) that severely compromises anti-tumor immunity. Despite the transformative success of immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive cell therapies, clinical efficacy is frequently curtailed by the metabolic barriers imposed by the TME. This review systematically elucidates the complex metabolic interplay between tumor cells and infiltrating T cells, highlighting two defining mechanisms driving immune evasion: the competitive sequestration of essential nutrients and the accumulation of immunosuppressive oncometabolites. We detail how the depletion of glucose and critical amino acids (glutamine, arginine, methionine, etc.) imposes a state of “metabolic siege” on T cells, impairing their bioenergetics and effector functions. Concurrently, we explore how accumulated metabolites—such as lactate, succinate, 2-hydroxyglutarate, kynurenine, and lipids—function as non-canonical signaling molecules to subvert immune surveillance via epigenetic remodeling and oxidative stress. Furthermore, we synthesize emerging therapeutic strategies designed to dismantle this metabolic barrier, including targeting metabolic enzymes (IDO1 and FASN) and transporters, repurposing metabolic waste, and genetically engineering T cells with enhanced metabolic fitness and resilience. By integrating the latest insights into the “metabolism–epigenetics–immunity” axis, this review provides a theoretical foundation for developing next-generation immunotherapies that target metabolic vulnerabilities to overcome resistance in cancer treatment. Full article

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), also known as esthesioneuroblastoma, is a rare malignant tumor arising from the olfactory epithelium of the sinonasal tract. Surgery combined with radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for localized disease, whereas chemotherapy is mainly used in advanced or recurrent cases. However, recurrent and metastatic ONB continues to present major therapeutic challenges, and traditional staging and histological grading systems cannot fully explain the marked differences in clinical behavior among patients. The primary objective of this review is to summarize recent advances in the molecular pathology, tumor microenvironment (TME), and emerging targeted therapeutic strategies in ONB. Emerging genomic and transcriptomic studies suggest that ONB comprises biologically heterogeneous tumors with distinct molecular and transcriptional programs associated with proliferation, neuroendocrine differentiation, angiogenesis, and stromal remodeling. Furthermore, we explore the increasing attention directed toward the TME, including immune-cell infiltration, angiogenic signaling, and immune checkpoint expression, which may influence therapeutic response. These molecular findings have generated interest in several potential targeted treatment strategies, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), anti-angiogenic therapy, epigenetic-targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and DNA-damage-response-targeted approaches. Ultimately, although the current evidence remains limited because of the rarity of the disease, novel therapeutic strategies for ONB are emerging. In addition to summarizing the current landscape, this review discusses the translational challenges and future directions for precision oncology and biomarker-driven therapy, aiming to provide insights for improving individualized patient management. Full article

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers, with a five-year survival rate of less than 12%. Oncolytic viruses are considered a promising immunotherapeutic approach, but their effectiveness is often limited by the innate interferon response, which is the main antiviral barrier in resistant tumors. A combination of an oncolytic virus with JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors has been proposed to overcome this resistance. Methods: In this study, we investigated the oncolytic and immunotherapeutic potential of the attenuated yellow fever vaccine strain YFV 17D in combination with the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in a panel of six PDAC cell lines with diverse genetic profiles and JAK/STAT signaling activities and in a syngeneic immunocompetent PAN02 mouse model. Results: In vitro, we identified three distinct response patterns: synergistic enhancement of viral replication and cytopathic effect, lack of synergism due to absent interferon signaling, and increased viral replication without cytopathic effect. Despite different cell mutation profiles, the cell response patterns were determined by the basal JAK/STAT activity of each cell line rather than by specific KRAS or TP53 mutation. In vivo, the combination therapy significantly extended median survival compared to YFV 17D monotherapy and the control group and induced tumor regression in 62.5% of animals. Since no difference in intratumoral viral RNA was detected between the combination and monotherapy groups, we suggest that the antitumor effect in vivo was mediated not by enhanced viral replication, but by activation of adaptive immunity. This is indirectly suggested by increased intratumoral IL-12, a fourfold increase in CD8⁺ T cell infiltration, a reduction in CD4⁺ cells, and the generation of virus-neutralizing antibodies. No systemic cytokine surge, neurovirulence, or viral dissemination was observed, suggesting the safety of the proposed regimen. Conclusions: These findings clarify the immune mechanisms determining the efficacy of YFV 17D combined with ruxolitinib and establish the basis for personalized patient stratification by tumor interferon signaling status. Full article

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide despite substantial advances in surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. The limited efficacy of current treatment strategies in advanced disease and the emergence of therapeutic resistance highlight the urgent need for novel adjunctive therapeutic approaches. Increasing evidence indicates that chronic stress and sustained activation of β-adrenergic signaling promote colorectal tumor initiation, progression, angiogenesis, metastatic dissemination, and immune evasion, thereby identifying this pathway as a potential therapeutic target. Drug repurposing has emerged as an attractive strategy for accelerating the development of new anticancer therapies by identifying novel applications for clinically approved drugs with well-established safety profiles. Among these, β-blockers have gained considerable attention because of their ability to inhibit β-adrenergic signaling and modulate multiple oncogenic pathways implicated in CRC progression. Although accumulating preclinical and observational clinical evidence suggests that β-blockers may possess anticancer potential, the underlying molecular mechanisms and their translational relevance have not yet been comprehensively integrated. This review provides a critical overview of the current evidence regarding the therapeutic potential of β-blockers in CRC by integrating findings from preclinical and clinical studies. Particular emphasis is placed on the regulation of key signaling pathways, including cAMP/PKA/CREB, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, as well as on the effects of β-blockers on tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metastasis, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment and antitumor immune responses. However, significant barriers limit the translation of these findings into routine clinical practice, including the limited representativeness of preclinical models, potential hemodynamic adverse effects, and the inherent limitations of observational studies. Importantly, owing to the lack of prospective randomized clinical trials, the current evidence remains insufficient to establish the clinical efficacy of β-blockers in colorectal cancer. Although β-blockers possess several characteristics that make them attractive candidates for drug repurposing, including a well-established safety profile, widespread availability, and low cost, further mechanistic studies, prospective randomized clinical trials, and biomarker-based patient stratification are essential to determine their clinical efficacy and define their role in personalized CRC therapy. Full article

Cancer metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, accounting for more than 90% of cancer deaths worldwide. However, the epigenetic mechanisms governing the metastatic cascade remain incompletely understood. Epigenetic reprogramming, including reversible changes in histone modifications, DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNA (ncRNA)-mediated regulation, enables tumor cells to acquire invasive, migratory, stem-like, and immune-evasive characteristics. During epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), key epigenetic regulators such as histone deacetylases (HDACs), the Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) subunit EZH2, lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A), and bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) proteins repress epithelial gene expression while activating mesenchymal transcriptional programs, promoting invasion and dissemination. At distant sites, epigenetic plasticity facilitates metastatic colonization through mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) and adaptive chromatin remodeling. Because these changes are reversible, they represent attractive therapeutic targets. HDAC, EZH2, LSD1/KDM1A, BET, and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical models of metastasis, with several advancing through clinical trials. Long non-coding RNAs, particularly HOTAIR, function as epigenetic scaffolds that reinforce metastatic programs, while reciprocal interactions between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) drive epigenetic adaptations that promote immune evasion and metastatic progression. In addition, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation signatures are emerging as minimally invasive biomarkers for assessing metastatic risk and monitoring treatment. This review summarizes current insights into the epigenetic regulation of cancer metastasis, evaluates emerging epigenetic therapies, and highlights translational opportunities to advance precision anti-metastatic strategies and improve patient outcomes. Full article

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts and the persistence of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) within a profoundly remodeled bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. Despite advances in molecular stratification and the introduction of targeted agents, long-term outcomes remain unsatisfactory, particularly in older and high-risk patients. Increasing evidence indicates that leukemogenesis and treatment resistance are critically sustained by a permissive immune milieu, in which LSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, leukemia-associated macrophages, and dysfunctional T and NK cells shape an immunosuppressive “leukemic niche.” This evolving understanding has renewed interest in immune-based strategies capable of restoring effective antitumor immunity. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are engineered molecules designed to engage AML-associated antigens while simultaneously recruiting and activating immune effector cells, most commonly T cells or NK cells. By promoting immune synapse formation independently of major histocompatibility complex expression and conventional co-stimulatory pathways, bsAbs can overcome several mechanisms of immune escape. In this review, we summarize the biological rationale for immunotherapy in AML, with a focus on the role of the BM microenvironment and immune dysregulation. We then discuss the structural and functional properties of IgG-like and non-IgG-like bsAbs, key antigenic targets such as CD33, CD123, CD70 and others, and the main T-cell- and NK-cell-engaging platforms under clinical investigation. Finally, we highlight emerging clinical data, principal toxicities, and the challenges of integrating bsAbs into existing treatment algorithms, including combinations with hypomethylating agents, BCL-2 inhibitors, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A deeper understanding of AML immune biology and antigen expression patterns will be essential to optimize bsAb design, maximize therapeutic benefit, and minimize on-target off-tumor toxicity. Full article

Background: IL-15 is a promising cytokine for cancer immunotherapy. IL-15 promotes differentiation and homeostasis of innate and adaptive immune cells, and their cytolytic effector functions. The IL-15 receptor is composed of IL-15Rα, IL-15Rβ and the common γ_c chains. IL-15 is also trans-presented as IL-15Rα:IL-15 complex to IL-15Rβ:γ_c on neighboring cells. IL-15Rα is dispensable for early immune response to infections and in autoimmune diabetes. The role of IL-15Rα in antitumor immune responses remains unclear. Methods: In WT, Il15^−/− and Il15ra^−/− mice, we studied the growth of syngeneic tumor cell lines and tumor immune surveillance against endogenous fibrosarcoma induced by methylcholanthrene (MCA). Immune gene signature and total proteome analysis were performed on MCA-induced tumors. Results: Lack of IL-15 or IL-15Rα did not enhance the growth of implanted tumor cell lines, despite reduced immune cell infiltration. MCA-induced tumor incidence was reduced in mice lacking IL-15Rα but not IL-15, although both are required for efficient tumor immunoediting. Il15^−/− and Il15ra^−/− tumors showed reduced Ifng expression but displayed differential modulation of Ifng-responsive genes. Proteome profiles of Il15^−/− tumors, but not tumor-derived cell lines, showed significant reduction in antigen presentation pathways. B16-F10 melanoma cells expressing NLRC5, the IFNγ-induced transcriptional activator of tumor antigen presentation, still required IL-15 but not IL-15Rα for efficient tumor control. Conclusions: Our findings show that IL-15 plays a negligible role in immunosurveillance against spontaneous tumor development, whereas IL-15Rα restrains immunosurveillance. Neither IL-15 nor IL-15Rα have a significant impact on implanted tumor models, although IL-15 facilitates efficient control of highly immunogenic tumors for which IL-15Rα is dispensable. Full article

CBL-B is an intracellular E3 ubiquitin ligase that acts as a T cell checkpoint by raising activation thresholds and limiting effector function. Here, genetic targeting of CBL-B enhances the performance of adoptively transferred T cells and CAR T cells under tumor microenvironment-like stress. In fully immunocompetent mouse models, Cblb deficiency or transient Cblb silencing improves control of MC-38 colon carcinoma and autochthonous mammary tumors, demonstrating that CBL-B restrains anti-tumor immunity. Cblb-deficient T cells show enhanced expansion and effector/effector-memory differentiation during an in vivo mixed lymphocyte reaction, confirming a cell-intrinsic brake function of CBL-B during sustained antigenic challenge. In a syngeneic Panc02-EpCAM model, Cblb-deficient anti-EpCAM CAR T cells show superior tumor control, enhanced infiltration, prolonged survival, and preserved effector function despite chronic antigen exposure and TGF-β. Mechanistically, Cblb targeting maintains granzyme B and IFN-γ production and is associated in vitro with increased GSDME-linked pyroptotic tumor cell death, consistent with features of immunogenic cell death. These findings extend previous CBL-B CAR T work from lymphocyte-deficient to immunocompetent settings and support CBL-B inhibition as a strategy to engineer CAR T cells that resist suppressive tumor microenvironments while promoting a more inflammatory mode of tumor killing. Full article

Background: Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT), understood as continuous, low-dose cytotoxic administration without prolonged drug-free intervals, has become an established strategy in several solid tumors, acting primarily through antiangiogenic, immunomodulatory, and direct cytostatic mechanisms rather than replication-dependent cytotoxicity. Despite an expanding evidence base, including positive randomized trials, validated predictive biomarkers of response remain unavailable. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2000 to July 2026) for phase II/III randomized trials, prospective cohorts, and selected retrospective analyses of MCT in breast cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, NSCLC, and mCRC, and extracted biomarker data from embedded translational substudies of eligible trials. Results: In breast cancer, phase III SYSUCC-001 (adjuvant metronomic capecitabine, improved DFS in TNBC) and MECCA (metronomic capecitabine plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2− disease) provide the strongest evidence, supported by randomized phase II data for the VEX regimen (METEORA-II) and MCT-anti-PD-1 combinations. TEMPO LUNG established metronomic vinorelbine as effective in platinum-unfit NSCLC, while CAIRO3 confirmed metronomic capecitabine–bevacizumab as an effective mCRC maintenance therapy. Most recently, the phase III TMC-I trial extended positive randomized evidence to head and neck cancer. Candidate biomarkers span angiogenic, immune, tumor proliferative, molecular, pharmacodynamic cytokine, on-treatment clinical (adverse-event-based), and gut–microbiome domains, with FOXC1, circulating endothelial cell kinetics, VEGF pathway markers, and regulatory T-cell dynamics among the most promising; however, none has been prospectively validated in a dedicated confirmatory trial. Conclusions: MCT has moved from empirical use to an evidence-based strategy across multiple tumor types, but the lack of validated predictive biomarkers limits informed patient selection. Future trials should incorporate biomarker-driven designs, particularly FOXC1, endothelial cell kinetics, and immune profiling as co-primary objectives. Defining an MCT-sensitive biological phenotype remains the key translational challenge for the field. Full article

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, causing more than 600,000 deaths every year. The human microbiome is increasingly recognized as a key regulator of cancer initiation, progression, and therapeutic response. Postbiotics—defined as non-viable microbial cells and/or their structural components and metabolites that confer health benefits—are emerging as promising and safer alternatives to live probiotics in oncology. This review provides a comprehensive mechanistic overview of the potential role of postbiotics against cancer, with a specific focus on breast cancer. Preclinical evidence demonstrates that selected postbiotics exert dose- and time-dependent anticancer effects against multiple breast cancer subtypes by modulating key oncogenic pathways (such as PI3K/AKT and NF-κB) and inducing epigenetic regulation through histone deacetylase inhibition. Beyond direct effects on tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis, postbiotics influence the breast cancer microenvironment by reshaping cytokine networks, suppressing pro-metastatic inflammation, and enhancing antitumor immune responses through the activation of NK cells and T cells. We also provide emerging links between microbiome composition, estrobolome activity, and breast cancer subtype-specific biology. Despite these encouraging findings, the clinical translation of postbiotics in oncology remains limited. Currently, only one registered clinical trial investigates postbiotics in the oncology setting (melanoma), and no clinical trials have specifically evaluated postbiotics in breast cancer patients. This highlights a substantial translational gap between preclinical evidence and clinical application. Accordingly, well-designed, tumor-specific clinical trials are urgently needed to validate the safety, efficacy, and therapeutic potential of postbiotics as novel strategies in personalized breast cancer management. Full article

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T-cell therapies have substantially improved cancer treatment outcomes, but their use is often limited by immune-related toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome. The role of interleukin (IL)-17A in tumor immunity remains controversial, hindering its therapeutic applications in cancer. A concern is that application of IL-17 blocking agents to release cytokine storms caused by tumor immunotherapy reverses anti-tumor immunity. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the effect of IL-17A blockade alone and in combination with anti–PD (programmed cell death)-1 therapy or tumor-specific CD8⁺ T cells in melanoma, colon, and lung tumors, and in UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis. Results: Our results showed that blocking IL-17A inhibited tumor development, and did not impair the efficacy of tumor immunotherapies with checkpoint inhibitors or tumor-specific T cells. Combined treatment with anti-IL-17A and anti-PD-1 antibodies significantly enhanced tumor suppression compared to single-agent therapies in all tested tumor models. Moreover, IL-17A blockade improved the efficacy of adoptive CD8⁺ T-cell therapy. Mechanistic analyses revealed that the combination therapy increased infiltration of activated antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells in tumors. In none of the tested tumor models did IL-17A blockade negatively affect the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors or T-cell therapy. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the combined application of anti-IL-17A blocking agents with current tumor immunotherapy at the same time is a promising strategy to enhance the efficacy and potentially diminish immune-related adverse effects. Full article