Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (21)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = artificial urinary sphincter

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 3583 KB  
Review
Critical Care and Surgical Management of Vascular Complications in Minimally Invasive Urological Reconstructive Surgery
by Lucía Polanco-Pujol, Jorge Caño-Velasco, Rui Miguel Duarte Pedrosa, Claudia Fernandes and Luis López-Fando
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 6740; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196740 - 24 Sep 2025
Viewed by 389
Abstract
Background: Despite the benefits of minimally invasive pelvic floor reconstructive surgery, serious life-threatening complications have been described. The most serious complications are vascular and intestinal. This review discusses the incidence, diagnosis, management and prevention of vascular complications in minimally invasive pelvic floor [...] Read more.
Background: Despite the benefits of minimally invasive pelvic floor reconstructive surgery, serious life-threatening complications have been described. The most serious complications are vascular and intestinal. This review discusses the incidence, diagnosis, management and prevention of vascular complications in minimally invasive pelvic floor reconstructive surgery (sacrocolpopexy and artificial urinary sphincter). Objectives: We aimed to determine the incidence and management of vascular complications in minimally invasive pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. Methods: This narrative literature review on the incidence and management of vascular complications at sacrocolpopexy and artificial urinary sphincter was performed after the search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo published in English between January 2011 and June 2025. The keywords used were “vascular”, “complication”, “sacrocolpopexy”, and “artificial urinary sphincter”. We selected 19 manuscripts for comprehensive review. Conclusions: Dissection of the sacral promontory during sacrocolpopexy requires an exquisite knowledge of pelvic anatomy and adequate preoperative planning to avoid vascular injuries and find alternatives for mesh fixation if it cannot be performed in the usual anatomical location. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 715 KB  
Article
Open vs. Robot-Assisted Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Multicenter Comparative Study
by Alexandre Dubois, Grégoire Capon, Olivier Belas, Adrien Vidart, Andrea Manunta, Juliette Hascoet, Lucas Freton, Frederic Thibault, Vincent Cardot, Frédéric Dubois, Luc Corbel, Emmanuel Della Negra, François Haab, Laurence Peyrat, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Philippe Grise, Aurélien Descazeaud, Georges Fournier and Benoit Peyronnet
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(1), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010284 - 6 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1538
Abstract
Background: The artificial urinary sphincter has been an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women. However, the use of this device has been limited by the technical difficulties and risks associated with the open implantation procedure. Preliminary [...] Read more.
Background: The artificial urinary sphincter has been an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women. However, the use of this device has been limited by the technical difficulties and risks associated with the open implantation procedure. Preliminary studies using robotic techniques have shown promising results, but only one small study has compared robotic to open procedures. This study aims to compare the outcomes of robotic and open artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in a large multicenter cohort. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from female patients who underwent open or robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter implantation from 2006 to 2020 at 12 urology departments. The primary outcome was the rate of complications within 30 days after surgery, graded using the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Perioperative and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 135 patients were included, with 71 in the robotic group and 64 in the open group. The open group had a higher rate of intraoperative complications (27.4% vs. 12.7%; p = 0.03) and postoperative complications (46.8% vs. 15.5%; p < 0.0001). More patients in the robotic group achieved full continence (83.3% vs. 62.3%; p = 0.01). The open group had higher explantation (27.4% vs. 1.4%; p < 0.0001) and revision rates (17.5% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.02). The estimated 1-year explantation-free survival rate was higher in the robotic group. (98.6% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Robot-assisted implantation may reduce perioperative morbidity and improve functional outcomes compared to open implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 230 KB  
Review
Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review
by Ryan L. Frazier, Marilyn E. Jones and Matthias D. Hofer
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1913; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071913 - 26 Mar 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4653
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence is a financially burdensome and socially isolating problem and can be experienced by men as a result of radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or other urologic surgery. Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for stress urinary incontinence is considered the ‘gold standard’ [...] Read more.
Stress urinary incontinence is a financially burdensome and socially isolating problem and can be experienced by men as a result of radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or other urologic surgery. Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for stress urinary incontinence is considered the ‘gold standard’ for male stress urinary incontinence. While initially only placed by specialized prosthetic surgeons, changes in urologic training have made implantation of the device by general urologists more widespread. Additionally, even though a minority of urologists place the majority of implants, many urologists may find themselves caring for patients with these devices even if they have never placed them themselves. For this reason, it is paramount that the urologic surgeon implanting the device and those caring for patients with prostheses are familiar with the various perioperative and postoperative complications of AUS implantation. This review discusses the most commonly reported complications of AUS implantation as well as those that are rarely described. Knowledge of these potential complications is necessary in order to care for patients with urologic implants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Urethral Reconstruction)
20 pages, 2614 KB  
Review
Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Unsolved Clinical Challenge
by Niklas Harland, Simon Walz, Daniel Eberli, Florian A. Schmid, Wilhelm K. Aicher, Arnulf Stenzl and Bastian Amend
Biomedicines 2023, 11(9), 2486; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11092486 - 7 Sep 2023
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 8169
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence is still a frequent problem for women and men, which leads to pronounced impairment of the quality of life and withdrawal from the social environment. Modern diagnostics and therapy improved the situation for individuals affected. But there are still limits, [...] Read more.
Stress urinary incontinence is still a frequent problem for women and men, which leads to pronounced impairment of the quality of life and withdrawal from the social environment. Modern diagnostics and therapy improved the situation for individuals affected. But there are still limits, including the correct diagnosis of incontinence and its pathophysiology, as well as the therapeutic algorithms. In most cases, patients are treated with a first-line regimen of drugs, possibly in combination with specific exercises and electrophysiological stimulation. When conservative options are exhausted, minimally invasive surgical therapies are indicated. However, standard surgeries, especially the application of implants, do not pursue any causal therapy. Non-absorbable meshes and ligaments have fallen into disrepute due to complications. In numerous countries, classic techniques such as colposuspension have been revived to avoid implants. Except for tapes in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women, the literature on randomized controlled studies is insufficient. This review provides an update on pharmacological and surgical treatment options for stress urinary incontinence; it highlights limitations and formulates wishes for the future from a clinical perspective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 245 KB  
Review
Urinary Artificial Sphincter in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: Where Are We Today? A Narrative Review
by Anna Ricapito, Matteo Rubino, Pasquale Annese, Vito Mancini, Ugo Falagario, Luigi Cormio, Giuseppe Carrieri, Gian Maria Busetto and Carlo Bettocchi
Uro 2023, 3(3), 229-238; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro3030023 - 6 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3248
Abstract
Introduction: Urinary incontinence is a prevalent condition, especially in elderly men, with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) being a common cause after radical prostatectomy. The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), particularly the AMS 800™ device, has been the gold-standard treatment for moderate-severe male SUI for [...] Read more.
Introduction: Urinary incontinence is a prevalent condition, especially in elderly men, with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) being a common cause after radical prostatectomy. The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), particularly the AMS 800™ device, has been the gold-standard treatment for moderate-severe male SUI for decades. Despite some technical advancements and alternative devices like ZSI-375, Victo, and BR-SL-AS 904 being introduced, there is limited literature comparing their effectiveness to the AMS 800™. Methods: This literature review compares the AMS 800™ to the newer technologies in the management of SUI. We reviewed the current literature on urinary sphincter implant in male stress incontinence, including AMS 800™, ZSI-375, Victo, and BR-SL-AS 904. Findings: The AMS 800™ is a sophisticated system consisting of an inflatable cuff, a pressure-regulating balloon, and a control pump. Studies show continence rates ranging from 61% to 100% with AMS 800™ implants, with low infection rates and significant improvement in patients’ quality of life. The ZSI-375 sphincter is a unique single-piece cuff without an abdominal reservoir, simplifying implantation. Preliminary data show a social continence rate of 73% at six months, with lower complication rates than the AMS 800™. The VICTO® device offers adjustable pressure and a stress relief mechanism, providing conditional occlusion of the urethra. Early studies report a satisfaction rate of up to 94.2% and a complication rate of 17.6%. BR-SL-AS 904 is a newly proposed urinary sphincter, but due to the limited number of cases and a single study, its efficacy and complication rates remain uncertain. Conclusions: Overall, AMS 800™ remains the gold-standard treatment for SUI after radical prostatectomy. Alternative devices like ZSI-375 and VICTO® show promising results, but longer studies and more data are needed to establish their effectiveness and safety compared with the AMS 800™. Further research and ongoing monitoring are essential to address mechanical issues associated with AUS implants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lower Urinary Tract Research: Rationale, Feasibility, and Design)
12 pages, 637 KB  
Review
Artificial Urinary Sphincters for Moderate Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: Current Research and Proposed Approach
by Andrew Johnson, Spencer Mossack and Peter Tsambarlis
Cancers 2023, 15(18), 4424; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184424 - 5 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2739
Abstract
Male urinary incontinence is a common complication after radical prostatectomy. The severity of incontinence can be assessed in various ways and helps determine the best surgical intervention to restore continence. While most patients with mild incontinence receive a sling and those with severe [...] Read more.
Male urinary incontinence is a common complication after radical prostatectomy. The severity of incontinence can be assessed in various ways and helps determine the best surgical intervention to restore continence. While most patients with mild incontinence receive a sling and those with severe incontinence receive an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), there are no clear guidelines on how to manage patients with moderate post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). Our discussion will focus on the current literature, which demonstrates that an AUS should be considered first-line in men with moderate PPI despite perceived concerns over complications and reintervention rates. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 700 KB  
Article
Comparison Study between Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Adjustable Male Sling: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis
by Paolo Geretto, Enrico Ammirati, Marco Falcone, Alberto Manassero, Marco Agnello, Marcello Della Corte, Paolo Gontero and Alessandro Giammò
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5489; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175489 - 24 Aug 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 1982
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the AUS and an adjustable male sling (ATOMSTM). Methods: It was a retrospective observational cohort study with two arms. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in order to limit selection bias and, [...] Read more.
Aims: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the AUS and an adjustable male sling (ATOMSTM). Methods: It was a retrospective observational cohort study with two arms. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in order to limit selection bias and, consequently, a comparison between groups in terms of functional outcomes (24 h pad test and perception of improvement questionnaires), complications (overall complications, high-grade complications, reinterventions and explantations) and device survival was performed. Results: 49 patients in both arms were included. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean follow up was 43 ± 35 months. Dryness was achieved in 22 patients (44.9%) in the AUS group and 11 (22.5%) in the sling group (p = 0.03). A total of 40 patients declared themselves well improved in the sling group (81%), while 35 (71%) declared the same in the AUS group (p = 0.78). The AUS was associated with more high-grade complications, reinterventions and explantations than the ATOMSTM. Survival at 60 months was 82 ± 9% in the sling group and 67 ± 7% in the AUS group (p = 0.03). Conclusions: While the AUS may be characterized by a higher dry rate, it has an increased risk of high-grade complications and reinterventions. It is proposed that the ATOMS prosthesis can be successfully used for patients who require a less invasive procedure that maintains good functional outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Urinary Incontinence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 892 KB  
Article
Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
by Fabian Queissert, Tanja Huesch, Alexander Kretschmer, Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns, Tobias Pottek, Roberto Olianas, Alexander Friedl, Roland Homberg, Jesco Pfitzenmaier, Carsten M. Naumann, Joanne Nyarangi-Dix, Torben Hofmann, Achim Rose, Christian Weidemann, Carola Wotzka, Wilhelm Hübner, Hagen Loertzer, Rudi Abdunnur, Markus Grabbert, Ralf Anding, Ricarda M. Bauer, Axel Haferkamp and Andres J. Schraderadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(12), 4002; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124002 - 12 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2209
Abstract
Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy [...] Read more.
Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy investigates the additive effect of the post-radiogenic stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck on AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study, we analyzed patients fitted with an AMS 800, comparing those who had received radiotherapy with patients presenting a devastated bladder outlet (stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck). We determined the correlation between these groups of patients using both univariate and stepwise adjusted multivariate regression. The revision-free interval was estimated by a Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by applying the log-rank test. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 123 irradiated patients we identified, 62 (50.4%) had undergone at least one prior desobstruction for bladder-neck/urethra stenosis. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, the latter tended to achieve social continence less frequently (25.7% vs. 35%; p = 0.08). Revision was required significantly more often for this group (43.1% vs. 26.3%; p = 0.05) due to urethral erosion in 18 of 25 cases. A stenosis recurred in five cases; desobstruction was performed in two cases, leading to erosion in both. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of revision when recurrent stenosis necessitated at least two prior desobstructions (HR 2.8; p = 0.003). Conclusions: A devastated bladder outlet is associated with a lower proportion of men with social continence and a significantly higher need for revision compared with irradiated patients without a history of urethral stenosis. Alternative surgical procedures should be discussed beforehand, especially in cases of recurrent urethral stenosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prostate Cancer Treatment Options and Its Complications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3309 KB  
Article
Transalbugineal Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Refined Implantation Technique to Improve Surgical Outcomes
by Emilio Sacco, Filippo Marino, Carlo Gandi, Riccardo Bientinesi, Angelo Totaro, Stefano Moretto, Filippo Gavi, Marco Campetella and Marco Racioppi
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(8), 3021; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12083021 - 21 Apr 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2605
Abstract
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation is an effective treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI). Still, it may result in troublesome complications such as intraoperative urethral lesion and postoperative erosion. Based on the multilayered structure of the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa, [...] Read more.
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation is an effective treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI). Still, it may result in troublesome complications such as intraoperative urethral lesion and postoperative erosion. Based on the multilayered structure of the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa, we evaluated an alternative transalbugineal surgical technique of AUS cuff placement with the aim to decrease perioperative morbidity while preserving the integrity of the corpora cavernosa. A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary referral center from September 2012 to October 2021, including 47 consecutive patients undergoing AUS (AMS800®) transalbugineal implantation. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 60 (24–84) months, no intraoperative urethral injury and only one noniatrogenic erosion occurred. The actuarial 12 mo and 5 yr overall erosion-free rates were 95.74% (95% CI: 84.04–98.92) and 91.76% (95% CI: 75.23–97.43), respectively. In preoperatively potent patients, the IIEF-5 score remained unchanged. The social continence (0–1 pads per day) rate was 82.98% (CI 95%: 68.83–91.10) at 12 mos and 76.81% (CI 95%: 60.56–87.04) at 5 yrs follow-up. Our technically refined approach to AUS implantation may help to avoid intraoperative urethral lesions and lower the risk of subsequent erosion without compromising sexual function in potent patients. Prospective and adequately powered studies are necessary to achieve more compelling evidence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Urinary Incontinence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1788 KB  
Review
Update on Adjustable Trans-Obturator Male System (ATOMS) for Male Incontinence after Prostate Cancer Surgery
by Carlos Téllez, Juliusz Szczesniewski, Miguel Virseda-Chamorro, Ignacio Arance and Javier C. Angulo
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(4), 4153-4165; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040316 - 12 Apr 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3789
Abstract
(1) Background: The adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) is a surgical device developed to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) after prostate cancer treatment. We review the current literature on this anti-incontinence device with the intention of assessing the effectiveness, safety and duration of the [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) is a surgical device developed to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) after prostate cancer treatment. We review the current literature on this anti-incontinence device with the intention of assessing the effectiveness, safety and duration of the silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP) ATOMS, the only generation of the device that is currently available. (2) Material and Methods: Non-systematic literature review is performed. Forty-eight full-text articles are assessed for eligibility. Case reports, expert opinions or commentaries without specific data reported (n = 6), studies with patients who underwent intervention before 2014 (IP or SP ATOMS; n = 10), and studies with incontinence after transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P; n = 2) are excluded for analysis. Thirty studies with SSP ATOMS are included in a qualitative synthesis that incorporates systematic reviews (n = 3), articles partially overlapping with other previously published studies (e.g., follow-up or series updates; n = 9), and studies focusing on specific populations (n = 8). Only articles revealing outcomes of SSP ATOMS were included in the quantitative synthesis of results (n = 10). (3) Results: the pooled data of 1515 patients from the 10 studies with SSP ATOMS confirmed very satisfactory results with this device after adjustment: dry rate: 63–82%, improved rate: 85–100%, complication rate: 7–33%, device infection rate: 2.7–6.2% and explant rate: 0–19%. The durability of the device is reassuring, with 89% of devices in place 5 years after implantation. (4) Conclusion: Despite the absence of randomized controlled studies, the literature findings confirm results of SSP ATOMS appear equivalent to those of artificial urinary sphincters (AUSs) in terms of continence, satisfaction and complications, but with a lower rate of revision in the long-term. A prospective study identified that patients with daily pad test results <900 mL and a Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale (MSIGS) of not 4 (i.e., early and persistent stream or urine loss) are the best candidates. Future studies centered on the elder population at higher risk of impaired cognitive ability and in patients including radiation as prostate cancer treatment are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgery for Prostate Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 638 KB  
Review
Intravesical Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Men without Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Post-Deobstructive Prostate Surgery
by Hsiang-Ying Lee and Hann-Chorng Kuo
Toxins 2023, 15(3), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15030221 - 15 Mar 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3164
Abstract
Purpose: A significant proportion of men without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) have been reported to have overactive bladders (OAB). This article aimed to review the specific group of reports on the use of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections into the bladder wall. [...] Read more.
Purpose: A significant proportion of men without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) have been reported to have overactive bladders (OAB). This article aimed to review the specific group of reports on the use of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections into the bladder wall. Materials and methods: Original articles reporting men with small prostates without BOO were identified through a literature search using the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Finally, we included 18 articles that reviewed the efficacy and adverse effects of BTX-A injections in men. Results: Of the 18 articles screened, 13 demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of BTX-A injections in men. Three studies compared BTX-A injection response between patients without prior prostate surgery and those undergoing prior prostate surgery, including transurethral resection of the prostate and radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients with prior RP experienced better efficacy and had a low risk of side effects. Two studies focused on patients who had undergone prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence, including male sling and artificial urethral sphincter surgery. The BTX-A injection was a safe and effective procedure for this specific group. OAB in men was found to have a different pathophysiology mechanism from that in female patients, which may decrease the efficacy of BTX-A injection in men. However, patients with small prostates and low prostate-specific antigen levels demonstrated better efficacy and tolerability after BTX-A injection. Conclusions: Although intravesical injection of BTX-A was a good option for controlling refractory OAB in men, the evidence-based guidelines are still limited. Further research is necessary to better understand the role of BTX-A injections on various aspects and histories. Therefore, treating patients using strategies tailored to their individual conditions is important. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 749 KB  
Review
Latest Evidence on Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence
by Mauro Gacci, Cosimo De Nunzio, Vasileios Sakalis, Malte Rieken, Jean-Nicolas Cornu and Stavros Gravas
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031190 - 2 Feb 2023
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 12191
Abstract
A radical prostatectomy is frequently used as the first-line treatment for men with prostate cancer. Persistent urinary incontinence after surgery is one of the most severe adverse events. We report the results of a comprehensive literature search focused on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI), [...] Read more.
A radical prostatectomy is frequently used as the first-line treatment for men with prostate cancer. Persistent urinary incontinence after surgery is one of the most severe adverse events. We report the results of a comprehensive literature search focused on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI), performed by a panel of experts on non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. The data on the prevalence and timing of PPI are very heterogeneous. The etiology of PPI can be multifactorial and mainly dependent on patient characteristics, lower urinary tract function or surgical issues. The medical history with a physical examination, the use of validated questionnaires with a voiding diary and pad tests are determinants in identifying the contributing factors and choosing the right treatment. Lifestyle intervention and urinary containment are the most frequently used strategies for the conservative management of PPI, while antimuscarinics, beta-3 agonists and duloxetine (off-label) are drugs indicated to manage PPI with a concomitant overactive bladder. Surgical therapies for the management of post-prostatectomy SUI include non-adjustable trans-obturator slings in men with mild-to-moderate incontinence and an artificial urinary sphincter in men with moderate-to-severe incontinence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Urinary Incontinence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 13286 KB  
Article
Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type
by Glenn T. Werneburg, Daniel Hettel, Ava Adler, Sromona D. Mukherjee, Scott D. Lundy, Kenneth W. Angermeier, Hadley M. Wood, Bradley C. Gill, Sandip P. Vasavada, Howard B. Goldman, Raymond R. Rackley, Daniel A. Shoskes and Aaron W. Miller
Biomedicines 2023, 11(1), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010215 - 14 Jan 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3364
Abstract
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is an effective treatment option for incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in the context of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. A subset of AUS devices develops infection and requires explant. [...] Read more.
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is an effective treatment option for incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in the context of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. A subset of AUS devices develops infection and requires explant. We sought to characterize biofilm composition of the AUS device to inform prevention and treatment strategies. Indwelling AUS devices were swabbed for biofilm at surgical removal or revision. Samples and controls were subjected to next-generation sequencing and metabolomics. Biofilm formation of microbial strains isolated from AUS devices was reconstituted in a bioreactor mimicking subcutaneous tissue with a medical device present. Mean patient age was 73 (SD 10.2). All eighteen artificial urinary sphincter devices harbored microbial biofilms. Central genera in the overall microbe–metabolite interaction network were Staphylococcus (2620 metabolites), Escherichia/Shigella (2101), and Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum (674). An rpoB mutation associated with rifampin resistance was detected in 8 of 15 (53%) biofilms. Staphylococcus warneri formed greater biofilm on polyurethane than on any other material type (p < 0.01). The results of this investigation, wherein we comprehensively characterized the composition of AUS device biofilms, provide the framework for future identification and rational development of inhibitors and preventive strategies against device-associated infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bench to Bedside in Neuro-Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 241 KB  
Article
Satisfaction with Urinary Incontinence Treatments in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
by Sheng-Fu Chen, Yu Khun Lee and Hann-Chorng Kuo
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5864; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195864 - 4 Oct 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2676
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the long-term satisfaction and complications in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients after various bladder management strategies and surgical procedures for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Methods: Patients at a single institution with chronic SCI who received bladder management treatment [...] Read more.
Purpose: To investigate the long-term satisfaction and complications in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients after various bladder management strategies and surgical procedures for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Methods: Patients at a single institution with chronic SCI who received bladder management treatment or surgical procedure to improve urinary continence were retrospectively assessed. Thorough urological examinations and videourodynamic studies were performed. Patients were treated either through conservative approaches including medical treatment, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), cystostomy, and indwelling urethral catheter, or through surgical procedures including detrusor botulinum toxin (Botox) injections, augmentation, ileal conduit, Kock pouch diversion, continent cystostomy, suburethral sling, and artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) implantation. The patients’ satisfaction with urinary continence improvement, causes of dissatisfaction, long-term complications, and overall satisfaction with bladder and voiding condition were assessed. Results: A total of 700 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. High satisfaction rates were noted after detrusor Botox injection (81.1%), augmentation enterocystoplasty (91.4%), autoaugmentation (80%), Kock pouch diversion, and continent cystostomy (all 100%). Fair satisfaction rates were noted after ileal conduit diversion (66.7%), suburethral sling (64.3%), and AUS implantation (66.7%). Patients who received conservative treatment with medicines, CIC, cystostomy, or an indwelling urethral catheter all had less-satisfactory outcomes (all < 40%). Conclusion: Overall satisfaction with surgical procedures aimed to improve urinary continence in chronic SCI patients was higher than with conservative bladder management (35.4%). Appropriate surgical procedures for chronic SCI patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and urological complications yielded satisfaction with both urinary continence improvement and with overall bladder and voiding condition. Full article
11 pages, 1670 KB  
Article
ATOMS (Adjustable Trans-Obturator Male System) in Patients with Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence and Previously Treated Urethral Stricture or Bladder Neck Contracture
by Ane Ullate, Ignacio Arance, Miguel Virseda-Chamorro, Sonia Ruiz, Juliusz Szczesniewski, Carlos Téllez, Fabian Queissert, Juan F. Dorado and Javier C. Angulo
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4882; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164882 - 19 Aug 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2148
Abstract
(1) Background: Male stress incontinence in patients with previously treated urethral or bladder neck stricture is a therapeutic challenge. The efficacy and safety of the adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) in these patients is unknown. (2) Methods: All patients with primary ATOMS implants [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Male stress incontinence in patients with previously treated urethral or bladder neck stricture is a therapeutic challenge. The efficacy and safety of the adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) in these patients is unknown. (2) Methods: All patients with primary ATOMS implants in our institution between 2014 and 2021 were included. The outcomes of patients with previously treated urethral or bladder neck stricture (≥6 months before ATOMS implant) and stable 16Ch urethral caliber were compared to those without a history of stricture. The primary endpoint was the dry patient rate, defined as the pad test ≤ 20 mL/day, and complication rate, including device removal. The secondary variable was self-perceived satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression were performed. (3) Results: One hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients were included, twenty-one (14%) previously treated for urethral or bladder neck stricture (seven urethroplasty, nine internal urethrotomy and five bladder neck incision). After ATOMS adjustment, 38% of the patients with treated stricture were continent compared to 83% of those without (p < 0.0001). After weighted matched observations using propensity score pairing, the proportion of continent patients without a previous stricture was 56% (p = 0.236). Complications occurred in 29% of the patients with stricture and in 20% of those without (p = 0.34). The severity of the complications was distributed evenly among the groups (p = 0.42). Regarding self-perceived satisfaction with the implant, 90% of the patients with stricture perceived the results satisfactorily (PGI-I 1–3) compared to 97% of the rest (p = 0.167). Stricture was associated with radiotherapy (p < 0.0001) and time from prostatectomy to implantation (p = 0.012). There was a moderate correlation between previous stricture and the severity of incontinence, both evaluated according to the 24-h pad test (Rho = 0.378; p < 0.0001) and the ICIQ-SF questionnaire (Rho = 0.351; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis for the factors predictive of failure after ATOMS adjustment revealed previous stricture (OR 4.66; 95% CI 1.2–18.87), baseline 24-h pad test (per 100 mL, OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.09–1.52) and final cushion volume (per mL, OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.19–1.55). This model predicted dryness with an AUC of 92%. After the PSMATCH procedure using a propensity score, the model remained unchanged, with the previous stricture (OR 8.05; 95% CI 1.08–110.83), baseline 24-h pad test (per 100 mL, OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.15–2.26) and final cushion volume (per mL, OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.17–2) being independent predictors and an AUC of 93%. (4) Conclusions: ATOMS can be used to treat male stress incontinence in patients with a history of stricture, although the effectiveness of the device is reduced. On the other hand, the security and perceived satisfaction were equivalent for both groups. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Urethral Reconstruction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop