Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (87)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = distal pancreatectomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
32 pages, 5226 KB  
Article
Three Types of Collateral Arterial Supply to the Spleen After Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomies with Splenic Vessels Resection—How to Use This Knowledge for Organ(s) Preservation in Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancers Surgery—Hemodynamic, Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of 134 Spleen-Preserving Pancreatectomies
by Viacheslav Egorov, Soslan Dzigasov, Alexey Kolygin, Mikhail Vyborniy, Grigoriy Bolshakov, Roman Petrov, Pavel Kim, Anna Demchenkova and Alexander Sorokin
Cancers 2026, 18(10), 1675; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101675 - 21 May 2026
Viewed by 321
Abstract
Background: Spleen-preserving (SP) distal pancreatectomy (DP) with splenic vessels resection (SVR) (Warsaw procedure, WP) is an option for the treatment of tumors with low malignant potential. The reverse blood flow through the short gastric arteries (SGA) explains the preservation of the spleen [...] Read more.
Background: Spleen-preserving (SP) distal pancreatectomy (DP) with splenic vessels resection (SVR) (Warsaw procedure, WP) is an option for the treatment of tumors with low malignant potential. The reverse blood flow through the short gastric arteries (SGA) explains the preservation of the spleen after SVR, but leaves the source of the blood supply to the SGAs hidden. The types of blood supply to the spleen after WP and their incidence have not been previously described, nor has the significance of these types for locally advanced pancreatic head cancer (LAPHC) surgery been determined. Aim: To determine the main types of spleen blood supply after WP, and to assess the feasibility and safety of splenic artery (SA) rotation for the organ-preserving surgery of LAPHC. Methods: Retrospective analyses of demographic and perioperative data, including CT scans, overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival after 71 SP DP SVR and 41 SP SVR pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) and total pancreatectomies (TP) for LAPHC (2007–2025). Results: In 134 SP procedures, SA was resected in 115 cases (71DP, 9 TP, 3 central, and 32 PD). Indications for surgery were MCN (41), IPMN (14), CSA (3), NEN (25), SPPN (8), PHDAC (40), sarcoma (1), autoimmune (1), and calculous chronic pancreatitis (1). There were no deaths or ischemia-related splenectomies. Morbidity—31% (n23); Dindo–Clavien (D-C) > 3b-2.8%; POPF-grade B-n7 (10.6%); splenic infarctions on CT after SVR-n18 (23%), one symptomatic. CT revealed three types of arterial blood supply to the spleen after SPDP SVR: left gastric artery (LGA) type (n50, 70, 5%), gastro-epyploic arcade (GEA) type (n9, 12, 5%), and an intermediate type (n12, 17%). Spleen- and pancreas tail-preserving SVR pancreatectomies for LAPHC (n41) were accompanied by rotation of the SA to substitute resected SMA (n19) and CHA (n15) for 26 Whipples and 8TPs. There were no ischemic complications. D-C > 3–19.5%. Median OS and PFS for PDAC were 35 and 21 months for 29.5 months median follow-up. Conclusions: Despite the preservation of blood flow through all potential sources of splenic blood supply following resection of the splenic artery, the main collaterals supplying the spleen after WP are LGA branches (~90%). This knowledge, with strict adherence to the developed criteria, allows for the safe preservation of the spleen, pancreatic tail, and stomach during pancreatectomies with SA resection, including its rotation for the substitution of the SMA and CHA in LAPHC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 804 KB  
Article
Assessing Textbook Oncologic Outcomes in Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study
by Ahmed Alnajar, Jack Dalton Sleeman, Elif Zeynep Nerez, Mehmet Akcin, Danny Sleeman and Onur Kutlu
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3967; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103967 - 21 May 2026
Viewed by 136
Abstract
Background: This study investigates textbook oncologic outcomes (TOO), a measurement operationally defined to produce a holistic measure of surgical success, with respect to patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing distal (left) pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study aims to identify factors associated [...] Read more.
Background: This study investigates textbook oncologic outcomes (TOO), a measurement operationally defined to produce a holistic measure of surgical success, with respect to patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing distal (left) pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study aims to identify factors associated with achieving TOO, emphasizing the role of hospital type. Methods: The NCDB (2010–2022) was queried for patients with clinical stage I–III pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients > 18 who underwent curative partial or total pancreatectomy. The primary outcome was the achievement of TOO—operationally defined as R0 resection, ≥12 lymph nodes examined, no prolonged hospital stay, absence of 30-day mortality, and no readmissions. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of TOO. Results: Analysis of 11,194 patients showed that 38.9% achieved TOO. Achievement of TOO was associated with a median increase in one year in overall survival. Factors associated with TOO achievements in the adjusted model include female sex, private insurance, a lower Charlson/Deyo score, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and high-volume centers. Notably, MIS emerged as a significant factor associated with 26% higher TOO (OR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14–1.40) while treatment at high-volume hospitals was associated with 28–112% increased TOO (OR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08–1.54 for Q3 volume and OR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.76–2.55 for Q4 volume). Conclusions: Achieving TOO is significantly influenced by patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and notably, the case volume of the treatment facility. These findings underscore the importance of considering centers experienced in surgical planning and patient counseling to optimize outcomes in distal pancreatectomies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current and Emerging Treatment Options in Pancreatic Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 992 KB  
Article
Tailored Surgical Treatment and Outcomes in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Case Series of Five Consecutive Paradigmatic Cases
by Arianna Pontrelli, Giovanna Di Meo, Francesco Paolo Prete, Piercarmine Panzera, Giuseppe Massimiliano De Luca, Natale Calomino, Maria Teresa Mita, Belinda De Simone, Michele Bisceglie, Monica Maria Miccoli, Alfio Gianalberto Testini, Michele Covelli, Massimo G. Viola, Luigi Marano and Mario Testini
Diseases 2026, 14(5), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases14050180 - 20 May 2026
Viewed by 200
Abstract
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN-P) are rare, low-grade malignancies primarily affecting young women. While surgical resection is definitive, the optimal balance between oncological radicality and functional preservation remains a clinical challenge. This study evaluates tailored surgical strategies utilizing minimally invasive [...] Read more.
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN-P) are rare, low-grade malignancies primarily affecting young women. While surgical resection is definitive, the optimal balance between oncological radicality and functional preservation remains a clinical challenge. This study evaluates tailored surgical strategies utilizing minimally invasive and parenchyma-preserving techniques. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of SPN-P cases treated between March 2020 and May 2023. Out of 167 pancreatic resections, five paradigmatic cases were identified. We analyzed the decision-making process for preoperative staging (CT/MRI/EUS-FNB), surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), and the implementation of parenchyma-preserving versus formal resections. Results: The cohort included four females and one male (mean age 40.6 years; range 13–73). Surgical approaches were tailored to tumor location and patient characteristics: two patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (one laparotomic, one laparoscopic), two underwent distal pancreatectomy (one robotic, one laparoscopic), and one pediatric patient underwent laparoscopic parenchyma-preserving central pancreatectomy. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. No Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) or complications Clavien-Dindo ≥III occurred. At a mean follow-up (FU) of 38.4 months (range 20–58), the disease-free survival rate was 100%. One patient developed new-onset diabetes mellitus following distal pancreatectomy. Conclusions: A tailored surgical approach—integrating robotic, laparoscopic, and parenchyma-preserving techniques—may enable excellent oncological outcomes while minimizing morbidity. For SPN-P, the choice of procedure should prioritize the preservation of pancreatic function, particularly in young patients, without compromising surgical margins. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1269 KB  
Review
Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatic Surgery: Current Indications, Results, and Future Prospects
by Silvio Caringi, Antonella Delvecchio, Annachiara Casella, Valentina Ferraro, Matteo Stasi, Nunzio Tralli, Tommaso Maria Manzia, Michele Tedeschi and Riccardo Memeo
Cancers 2026, 18(10), 1550; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101550 - 11 May 2026
Viewed by 482
Abstract
Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic surgery (PSPS) is a patient-centered alternative to traditional radical resections for benign and low-grade pancreatic lesions. Unlike pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, which tend to cause long-term exocrine and endocrine deficiency, PSPS aims to preserve functional tissue with a guarantee of oncologic [...] Read more.
Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic surgery (PSPS) is a patient-centered alternative to traditional radical resections for benign and low-grade pancreatic lesions. Unlike pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, which tend to cause long-term exocrine and endocrine deficiency, PSPS aims to preserve functional tissue with a guarantee of oncologic safety. Techniques such as enucleation, central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving head resection, and uncinectomy are illustrative of this equipoise, with less risk of new-onset diabetes and malabsorption but more short-term morbidity in the form of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Advances in imaging technology, minimally invasive procedures, and robotics technology have extended PSPS indications beyond conventional candidates to thoughtfully selected neuroendocrine tumors, cystic neoplasms, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Results are strongly dependent on patient selection, surgeon experience, and institutional volume, highlighting the importance of centralization and subspecialist training. While oncologic proficiency remains essential in aggressive tumors, evidence is in favor of PSPS being a curative and function-preserving option for properly screened patients with low-grade or benign conditions. Priorities for the future include multicenter prospective trials, optimization of perioperative techniques, and inclusion of patient-reported outcomes. PSPS represents a paradigm shift in pancreatic surgery, where technical innovation is balanced with quality of life in the long term and evolving principles of modern, individualized surgical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1801 KB  
Article
The Role of the Mesopancreas in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
by Stephan O. David, Ahmad. B. Sultani, Andrea Alexander, Sascha Vaghiri, Irene Esposito, Wolfram T. Knoefel and Sami A. Safi
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3270; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093270 - 24 Apr 2026
Viewed by 232
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) represent a heterogeneous tumor entity with a steadily rising incidence, mainly due to advances in imaging and growing diagnostic awareness. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the mesopancreas (MP) has been identified as a frequent site of microscopic [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) represent a heterogeneous tumor entity with a steadily rising incidence, mainly due to advances in imaging and growing diagnostic awareness. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the mesopancreas (MP) has been identified as a frequent site of microscopic tumor spread and a key determinant of circumferential resection margin (CRM) status, leading to the concept of standardized mesopancreatic excision (MPE). While its oncological relevance in PDAC is increasingly recognized, the role of the mesopancreas in PanNENs remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate mesopancreatic infiltration in PanNENs and to identify associated clinicopathological predictors. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing oncological pancreatoduodenectomy, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, or distal splenopancreatectomy for PanNENs and PanNECs were included. The mesopancreas was histopathologically examined for tumor infiltration within CRM assessment. Results: MP infiltration was detected in 60% of patients. It was associated with higher Ki-67 index, larger tumor size, lymph node involvement, venous invasion, and positive CRM status. A Ki-67 index ≥ 5% and tumor size ≥ 21.5 mm were identified as predictors of MP infiltration. Higher T stage predicted reduced overall survival (OS), whereas MP infiltration, lymphatic (L1) and venous (V1) invasion, and Ki-67 ≥ 5% were associated with impaired disease-free survival (DFS). Conclusions: Mesopancreatic infiltration is frequently present in PanNENs and correlates with aggressive tumor characteristics. Given its association with CRM positivity and reduced DFS, consideration of the mesopancreas in staging and surgical strategies appears oncologically justified. Larger studies are required to validate these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2933 KB  
Case Report
Configurational Setup for Fully Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy with Splenectomy Using Hugo™ RAS and Ligasure™ RAS Maryland: First Case Report (With Video)
by Orlin Belyaev, Hussein Salama, Tim Fahlbusch and Waldemar Uhl
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(6), 2423; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062423 - 22 Mar 2026
Viewed by 588
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Fully robotic pancreatic resections using the Hugo™ RAS platform have not yet been described in the literature. Methods: A 72-year-old male with a cystic lesion in the pancreatic tail underwent a fully robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy using the Hugo RAS platform [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Fully robotic pancreatic resections using the Hugo™ RAS platform have not yet been described in the literature. Methods: A 72-year-old male with a cystic lesion in the pancreatic tail underwent a fully robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy using the Hugo RAS platform and the newly introduced robotic vessel sealer LigaSure RAS. The proposed configurational setup and technical details are described. Results: The procedure was completed safely without complications: blood loss was <50 mL, total duration of surgery was 305 min, and console time was 195 min. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 7. Conclusions: Distal pancreatectomy with the Hugo RAS platform may be feasible and safe in selected cases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 5643 KB  
Case Report
Bilateral Pancreaticopleural Fistula Masquerading as Thoracic Disease in Chronic Calculous Pancreatitis
by Helen Bolanaki, Francesk Mulita, Ioannis Tzimagiorgis, Ioannis Chrysafis, Hippocrates Moschouris, Nikolaos Courcoutsakis, Savas P. Deftereos and Anastasios J. Karayiannakis
Diagnostics 2026, 16(5), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050720 - 28 Feb 2026
Viewed by 486
Abstract
Background: Pancreaticopleural fistula is a rare complication of chronic pancreatitis resulting from pancreatic duct disruption, typically presenting with pleural effusion and predominant respiratory symptoms. Bilateral pleural involvement is exceptionally uncommon and poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreaticopleural fistula is a rare complication of chronic pancreatitis resulting from pancreatic duct disruption, typically presenting with pleural effusion and predominant respiratory symptoms. Bilateral pleural involvement is exceptionally uncommon and poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old man with a history of chronic alcohol abuse presented with progressive dyspnea and mild epigastric pain. Imaging revealed bilateral pleural effusions, an atrophic pancreas with a markedly dilated main pancreatic duct containing calculi, and a fistulous tract extending from the pancreatic body through the esophageal hiatus into the mediastinum. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography confirmed the diagnosis of chronic calculous pancreatitis complicated by a pancreaticopleural fistula. After unsuccessful conservative management, the patient underwent distal pancreatectomy, resection of the fistulous tract, and Roux-en-Y pancreatojejunostomy. The postoperative course was uneventful, with complete resolution of pleural effusions and sustained clinical improvement. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of considering pancreaticopleural fistula in patients with unexplained pleural effusions and minimal abdominal symptoms, particularly in the context of chronic pancreatitis. Bilateral involvement, although rare, should not preclude timely diagnosis. Appropriate diagnostic studies by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are crucial for establishing the diagnosis. Surgical management offers definitive treatment in patients with ductal obstruction and calculous disease, resulting in excellent long- term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2824 KB  
Article
Analysis of Different Post-Operative Hyperamylasemia Criteria for Defining Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Distal Pancreatectomy—A Retrospective Single-Center Study
by Lukas Heinrich Poelsler, Ruben Bellotti, Daniel Pably, Dagmar Morell-Hofert, Eva Maier, Benno Cardini, Rupert Oberhuber, Thomas Resch, Florian Ponholzer, Felix J. Krendl, Christian Margreiter, Stefan Schneeberger, Dietmar Öfner and Manuel Maglione
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 1803; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051803 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 395
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery has recently defined post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP), stating that sustained postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) for at least 48 h is a pivotal criterion. However, the clinical relevance of POH and PPAP following distal pancreatectomy remains [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery has recently defined post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP), stating that sustained postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) for at least 48 h is a pivotal criterion. However, the clinical relevance of POH and PPAP following distal pancreatectomy remains uncertain. This study compares two PPAP definitions differing in POH criteria. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who consecutively underwent distal pancreatectomy at our institution (2010–2023). PPAP diagnosis required clinical symptoms, characteristic CT findings, and either sustained POH ≥ 48 h (standard group) or transient POH less than 48 h (modified group). Outcomes were compared between definitions. Results: Among 207 patients included, in the standard group, PPAP was diagnosed in 12 (5.8%), and in the modified group in 27 (13.0%) patients. Independent of the applied POH criteria, PPAP was associated with the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (standard: 66.7% vs. 23.7%; p < 0.001; modified: 44.4% vs. 23.7%; p = 0.027). Post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage and major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III) were also significantly more frequent in patients with PPAP. This was mirrored by a significantly longer length of stay and higher costs. However, in the standard group, PPAP more often resulted in pancreas-specific and major complications compared to the modified group. Of note, in the standard group, only 50% of patients with POH progressed to PPAP, and one-third of patients suffering from PPAP did not develop harmful sequelae. Conclusions: PPAP is an uncommon, however clinically relevant complication following distal pancreatectomy that is better captured using the standard POH definition. Still, further stratification is needed to aid in the prediction of the clinical course. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2523 KB  
Systematic Review
Evidence-Based Strategies for Mitigating Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
by Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Celeste del Basso, Fabio Giannone, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Igor Monsellato, Gianluca Cassese and Fabrizio Panaro
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(4), 1433; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041433 - 12 Feb 2026
Viewed by 698
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains a frequent complication after distal pancreatectomy and represents the first cause for major morbidity and mortality. Multiple strategies have been proposed to mitigate the severity of pancreatic fistula, but their real benefits remain inconclusive. This study aimed to [...] Read more.
Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains a frequent complication after distal pancreatectomy and represents the first cause for major morbidity and mortality. Multiple strategies have been proposed to mitigate the severity of pancreatic fistula, but their real benefits remain inconclusive. This study aimed to identify effective mitigation strategies for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) through a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Methods: A systematic search of the Medline and Web of Science databases was conducted for studies published between 2006 and February 2025. Eligible studies included randomized clinical trials evaluating strategies to mitigate clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. Only studies in English and involving human subjects were included. Results: Twenty-seven studies were found eligible, comprising 4062 patients, treated with 22 different strategies classified in 8 categories: tissue coverage, sealants and glues, systemic corticoids, analogues of somatostatin, anastomosis of the stump, drain usage, closure of the stump and transpapillary stent. Only 6 studies demonstrated a significant reduction in CR-POPF, strategies applied include systemic corticoids, selective use of drains, polyglycolic acid mesh, reinforced staplers, and collagen enhanced thrombin sealant. Conclusions: Studies reporting successful strategies show considerable heterogeneity in both the included populations and the way the strategies were applied. A personalized approach based on the risk of developing fistula and specific pancreatic features may be beneficial and should be further explored in future randomized clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Pancreatic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2718 KB  
Systematic Review
Bridging Imaging and Pathohistology in Pancreatic Hamartoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature with an Integrated Case Report
by Dunja Stankic, Nina Rajovic, Nikola Grubor, Jelena Rakocevic, Aleksandar Ninic, Marjan Micev, Jelena Vladicic Masic, Luka Joksimovic, Natasa Milic, Kristina Davidovic and Nikica Grubor
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(1), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010136 - 24 Dec 2025
Viewed by 761
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic hamartoma (PH) is an exceptionally rare, benign, mass-forming lesion accounting for less than 1% of all pancreatic tumors. Its rarity and non-neoplastic nature contribute to significant diagnostic challenges, often leading to misclassification as malignant disease. This study presents a case of [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreatic hamartoma (PH) is an exceptionally rare, benign, mass-forming lesion accounting for less than 1% of all pancreatic tumors. Its rarity and non-neoplastic nature contribute to significant diagnostic challenges, often leading to misclassification as malignant disease. This study presents a case of PH and a systematic review of all reported cases, with emphasis on histopathological and imaging characteristics. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to 1 April 2025, to identify eligible case reports and series. Results: We describe a 37-year-old woman with a cystic lesion of the pancreatic tail, ultimately confirmed histologically as a cystic pancreatic hamartoma following distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, with an uneventful postoperative course. Of 687 screened studies, 51 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 77 cases (68 adults, 9 pediatric). PHs occurred most frequently in males (52.9%), with a mean age of 59.5 ± 12.9 years, and were often asymptomatic (57.4%). The pancreatic head was the most common site (52.9%). On MRI, PHs typically exhibited low T1-weighted and high T2-weighted signal intensity, with no FDG uptake (82%) and moderate or no restriction on DWI, distinguishing them from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Histologically, most lesions were solid (64.7%) or solid–cystic (35.3%), with low spindle cell cellularity and absent Langerhans islets. Conclusions: Low T1WI signal and moderate DWI signal are the key features distinguishing PHs from NETs. Incorporating these findings with EUS-FNA and immunohistochemistry can support a provisional diagnosis and help avoid unnecessary radical surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2592 KB  
Article
Minimally Invasive Resection of Occult Insulinomas—Experience from an ENETS Centre of Excellence and Review of the Literature
by Alina S. Ritter, Feline Ockenga, Kira C. Steinkraus, Jelte Poppinga, Philipp H. von Kroge, Tania Amin, Fabrice Viol, Thorben W. Fründt, Felix Nickel, Thilo Hackert and Anna Nießen
Cancers 2025, 17(23), 3857; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233857 - 30 Nov 2025
Viewed by 829
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Insulinomas are rare insulin-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs). Preoperative tumour localisation can usually be achieved by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. However, cross-sectional imaging can be negative, defining an insulinoma as occult and thus hampering [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Insulinomas are rare insulin-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs). Preoperative tumour localisation can usually be achieved by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. However, cross-sectional imaging can be negative, defining an insulinoma as occult and thus hampering surgical resection. Methods: All patients who underwent minimally invasive (MI) surgery for an insulinoma at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf since 2017 were analysed. Clinicopathological parameters and diagnostic and operative approaches were assessed. A literature search of the MI resection of occult insulinomas was conducted. Results: Of eight patients with MI-resected insulinomas, two (25%) had negative preoperative imaging. Mean tumour size was 17.2 ± 13.3 mm. Patients underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP), enucleation, and pancreatic head resection (PHR) in 62.5% (5/8), 25.0% (2/8), and 12.5% (1/8) of cases, respectively. One patient had a major postoperative complication (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3a). Twenty-four studies reporting on 140 occult insulinomas were identified. Occult insulinomas were more frequent in females, often located in the distal pancreas and G1-differentiated. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/PET-CT most frequently localised the conventionally non-visible insulinomas (positive in 67/76, 88.2%). Enucleation, DP, PHR and other resections were conducted in 47/94 (50.0%), 40/94 (42.6%), 4/94 (4.3%), and 3 (3.2%) of the reported cases. MI resection was reported in 10 of 19 (52.6%) specified resections. Conclusions: Insulinomas can be undetectable in cross-sectional and functional imaging. Surgical exploration with intraoperative ultrasound should be considered when clinical presentation and biochemical findings are highly suggestive for insulinoma. Minimally invasive and parenchyma sparing resection is feasible even for occult insulinomas and should always be considered. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2865 KB  
Article
Deep Learning Model for Volume Measurement of the Remnant Pancreas After Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Distal Pancreatectomy
by Young Jae Kim, Juhui Lee, Yeon-Ho Park, Jaehun Yang, Doojin Kim, Kwang Gi Kim and Doo-Ho Lee
Diagnostics 2025, 15(22), 2834; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15222834 - 8 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 772
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Accurate volumetry of the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy is crucial for assessing postoperative endocrine and exocrine function but remains challenging due to anatomical variability and complex postoperative morphology. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL)-based model for automatic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Accurate volumetry of the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy is crucial for assessing postoperative endocrine and exocrine function but remains challenging due to anatomical variability and complex postoperative morphology. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL)-based model for automatic segmentation and volumetry of the remnant pancreas using abdominal CT images. Methods: A total of 1067 CT scans from 341 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 512 scans from 184 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy were analyzed. Ground truth masks were manually delineated and verified through multi-expert consensus. Six 3D segmentation models were trained and compared, including four convolution-based U-Net variants (basic, dense, residual, and residual dense) and two transformer-based models (Trans U-Net and Swin U-Net). Model performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation with sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and Dice similarity coefficient. Results: The Residual Dense U-Net achieved the best performance among convolutional models, with dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values of 0.7655 ± 0.0052 for pancreaticoduodenectomy and 0.8086 ± 0.0091 for distal pancreatectomy. Transformer-based models showed slightly higher DSCs (Swin U-Net: 0.7787 ± 0.0062 and 0.8132 ± 0.0101), with statistically significant but numerically small improvements (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The proposed DL-based approach enables accurate and reproducible postoperative pancreas segmentation and volumetry. Automated volumetric assessment may support objective evaluation of remnant pancreatic function and provide a foundation for predictive modeling in long-term clinical management after pancreatectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Diseases: Diagnosis, Treatment and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 993 KB  
Article
Outcomes Following Surgery for Pancreatic Neuro-Endocrine Tumours: A Single-Centre Experience
by Mina Fouad, Sayed Ali Almahari, Abed Moeti Zaitoun, Prithvirao Sonoo, Sepand Malek, Karim Sourial and Dhanny Gomez
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(11), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15110202 - 30 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1062
Abstract
Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes and recurrence patterns following curative-intent resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) at a UK tertiary centre. The secondary aims included identifying prognostic clinicopathological factors that influenced survival. Methods: Patients undergoing curative-intent surgical [...] Read more.
Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes and recurrence patterns following curative-intent resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) at a UK tertiary centre. The secondary aims included identifying prognostic clinicopathological factors that influenced survival. Methods: Patients undergoing curative-intent surgical resection for PNETs between August 2010 and March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. The data collated included demographics, histopathology, recurrence, and survival outcomes. Results: Eighty-six patients were included, with a median age of 61.5 years (IQR: 50–71) and an equal sex distribution. Most tumours were solitary (88.4%) and located in the pancreatic tail (57%), with distal pancreatectomy performed in 75% of cases. The median tumour size was 25 mm (IQR: 13–40). Lymph node metastases were observed in 23.3% of patients, and R0 resection was achieved in 67%. Most of the PNETs resected were WHO grade 1 tumours (65.1%), followed by grade 2 tumours (26.7%). Postoperative morbidity occurred in 37.2% of cases, while the 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.5%. Recurrence was observed in 13.95% of patients, with a median time to recurrence of 36.3 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 83.0%, with a median OS and disease-free survival (DFS) of 143.3 months and 147.0 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that poorer DFS was associated with larger tumours (p = 0.009), higher tumour grade (p = 0.006), male sex (p = 0.039), vascular invasion (p = 0.003), perineural invasion (p = 0.042) and lymph node metastases (p = 0.015). OS was significantly influenced by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.001) and tumour grade (p = 0.025). Conclusions: PNETs are associated with excellent long-term survival following curative-intent resection. However, adverse pathological features are linked to an increased risk of recurrence and a poorer prognosis. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

30 pages, 2735 KB  
Article
Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
by Nasser Abdul Halim, Eran Sadot and Ionut Negoi
Cancers 2025, 17(19), 3243; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193243 - 6 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2872
Abstract
Background: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is a potentially curative procedure for tumors of the pancreatic body and tail. Minimally invasive DP (MIDP), including laparoscopic and robotic techniques, is increasingly being adopted. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic DP (RDP) in [...] Read more.
Background: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is a potentially curative procedure for tumors of the pancreatic body and tail. Minimally invasive DP (MIDP), including laparoscopic and robotic techniques, is increasingly being adopted. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic DP (RDP) in comparison with laparoscopic and open approaches using a network meta-analysis and meta-regression. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies comparing at least two surgical approaches. Both Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-seven studies involving 18,113 patients met the inclusion criteria. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) analysis showed that RDP ranked first in 84.6% of measured parameters. Laparoscopic DP (LDP) demonstrated intermediate performance, whereas open DP (ODP) consistently ranked lowest. Operative time was significantly longer for RDP compared with ODP (MD = +25.93 min, 95% CI 7.68–44.18), while LDP and ODP were comparable. RDP significantly reduced 30-day mortality (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.16–0.84) and conversion rates compared with LDP (OR = 0.30, 95% CrI 0.22–0.40). Both minimally invasive approaches (RDP and LDP), compared with open surgery, were associated with reduced blood loss (−304 mL and −273 mL), fewer transfusions (OR 0.25 and 0.30), smaller transfused volumes (−1.98 and −1.86 units), shorter ICU stays (−4.0 and −2.3 days), fewer reinterventions (OR 0.45 and 0.56), and shorter hospital stays (−8.8 and −6.9 days), respectively. Conclusions: Although associated with longer operative time, RDP appears safe and may confer significant advantages over both laparoscopic and open surgery, including reduced 30-day mortality, lower conversion rates, and improved perioperative outcomes, particularly when performed in high-volume, well-equipped centers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robotic Surgery for Gastrointestinal (GI) Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 233 KB  
Review
Navigating the Spectrum of Pancreatic Surgery Complications: A Review
by Sibi Krishna Thiyagarajan, Alfredo Verastegui, John A. Stauffer and Katherine Poruk
Complications 2025, 2(4), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2040024 - 2 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3896
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, pancreatic resections such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) remain high-risk procedures. Postoperative complications significantly impact morbidity, mortality, and patient quality of life. Methods: This narrative review summarizes recent literature on major complications [...] Read more.
Background: Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, pancreatic resections such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) remain high-risk procedures. Postoperative complications significantly impact morbidity, mortality, and patient quality of life. Methods: This narrative review summarizes recent literature on major complications following pancreatic surgery, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), with an emphasis on incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and current preventive strategies. Results: POPF is a leading complication, occurring in 5–22% of cases and often linked with sepsis and hemorrhage. Key risk factors include high BMI, soft pancreatic texture, and small duct size. Preventive measures like Pasireotide, modified anastomosis techniques, and neoadjuvant therapy show variable success. DGE affects up to 57% of PD patients and is associated with prolonged recovery; antecolic reconstruction and erythromycin may reduce incidence. PPH, though less frequent (3–13%), can be life-threatening, particularly when secondary to POPF. Endovascular approaches are now favored for late arterial bleeding. Other complications include wound infections, abscesses, bile leaks, and pulmonary issues, all contributing to extended hospital stays and diminished quality of life. Conclusions: Pancreatic surgery continues to carry significant risks, with POPF, DGE, and PPH being the most impactful complications. While multiple interventions have shown promise, standardized protocols and predictive tools are still needed. Surgery should be performed in high-volume centers with experienced multidisciplinary teams to optimize outcomes. Full article
Back to TopTop