Search Results (2)

Background/Objectives: Optimal postprandial glycemic control is crucial to maintain time in range (TIR:3.9–10.0 mmol/L, 70–180 mg/dL) and time in tight range (TITR:3.9–7.8 mmol/L, 70–140 mg/dL), both important to reduce microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting fails to compensate for delayed hyperglycemia from protein and fat. This study evaluated two advanced insulin dosing algorithms designed to improve postprandial control in adolescents with T1DM. Methods: In this randomized, prospective, double-blind, crossover trial, 58 adolescents with T1DM (median age 15.5 years) were enrolled, all using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and a continuous glucose monitoring system in non-automated mode. For two consecutive days, participants consumed standardized mixed meals for breakfast (50 g of carbohydrates, 200 kcal from protein and fat) and received an extended bolus delivered for four hours, based on the Pankowska Equation (PE, i.e., Fat-Protein Units × Insulin-to-Carbohydrate Ratio (ICR)) and the Sieradzki Equation (SE, i.e., 30% × Carbohydrate Units × ICR). Postprandial glucose was monitored for five hours using a glucometer and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). The primary outcome was the capillary blood glucose level at predefined time points. The secondary outcomes were the frequency of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability parameters. Results: Both methods kept postprandial glucose within the recommended TIR. The SE method provided longer TITR (82.51% vs. 70.49%, p = 0.6281) and fewer hypoglycemic episodes at 180 and 300 min. Glucose levels at 60 min, were higher after PE (136 ± 35.2 mg/dL vs. 124 ± 32.2 mg/dL, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Both algorithms provided effective postprandial control after a mixed meal, but SE achieved a longer TITR and fewer late hypoglycemic events. Full article

Insulin pumps offer standard (SB), square and dual-wave boluses (DWB). Few recommendations exist on how to use these dosing options. Several studies suggest that the DWB is more effective for high-fat or high-carbohydrate meals. Our objective was to test whether time in range (TIR) improves in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using the universal utilization of the dual-wave boluses for all evening meals regardless of the composition of the meal. This was a 28-day long prospective randomized open-label single-center crossover study. Twenty-eight children with T1DM using a Medtronic 640G pump and continuous glucose monitoring system were randomly assigned to receive either DWB or SB for all meals starting from 6:00 p.m. based solely on the food carbohydrate count. DWB was set for 50/50% with the second part extended over 2 h. After two weeks patients switched into the alternative treatment arm. TIR (3.9–10 mmol/L), time below range (TBR) (<3.9 mmol/L) and time above range (TAR) (>10 mmol/L) and sensor glucose values were measured and compared between the groups. Twenty-four children aged 7–14 years completed the study according to the study protocol. There were no statistically significant differences in mean TIR (60.9% vs. 58.8%; p = 0.3), TBR (1.6% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.7) or TAR (37.5 vs. 39%; p = 0.5) between DWB and SB groups, respectively. Subjects in the DWB treatment arm administered significantly less correction boluses between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. compared to those in the SB group (1.2 ± 0.8 vs. 1.7 ± 0.8, respectively; p < 0.01). DWB for evening meals in which insulin is calculated solely on the food carbohydrate content did not improve TIR compared to standard bolus in children with T1D. However, DWB enabled to use significantly less correction boluses to achieve euglycemia by the morning compared to the SB. Full article