Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = durophagous predation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 3438 KB  
Article
The Evolution of Mosasaurid Foraging Behavior Through the Lens of Stable Carbon Isotopes
by Michael J. Polcyn, John A. Robbins, Anne S. Schulp, Johan Lindgren and Louis L. Jacobs
Diversity 2025, 17(4), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040291 - 19 Apr 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4309
Abstract
A large data set of new and previously published measurements of δ13C values derived from tooth enamel (n = 223, of which 93 are new) are compiled to explore patterns of foraging area preferences of Late Cretaceous mosasaurid squamates over [...] Read more.
A large data set of new and previously published measurements of δ13C values derived from tooth enamel (n = 223, of which 93 are new) are compiled to explore patterns of foraging area preferences of Late Cretaceous mosasaurid squamates over evolutionary time scales (~93–66 Ma). Our results indicate that small-bodied halisaurines are restricted to a relatively nearshore range, overlapping the lower end of the range of plioplatecarpines and some mosasaurine taxa. Most moderately sized plioplatecarpines occupy a relatively narrow foraging area in much of the nearshore and proximal offshore marine foraging area for the majority of their existence. Tylosaurines exhibit a greater offshore marine range than plioplatecarpines, consistent with their large body size and the robustness of their feeding apparatus. The largest tylosaurine taxa are replaced by Mosasaurus in the Late Campanian–Maastrichtian in the offshore foraging range. Mosasaurine taxa are found to occupy the broadest range of foraging areas, but their ranges are taxonomically segregated, consistent with adult body size and the diversity of feeding adaptations such as tooth morphologies and skull architecture seen in that subfamily. Where foraging areas of multiple taxa overlap, differences are typically in tooth form, reflecting prey preference or feeding niche. Foraging area occupation by multiple taxa with similar tooth forms suggests that other factors such as body size and prey acquisition style may have allowed for the finer partitioning of resources. Deep diving and long submergence may have also contributed to the depleted signals recovered for some of the large-bodied durophages and the largest of the macrophagous apex predators. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

47 pages, 5005 KB  
Article
Mosasaurids Bare the Teeth: An Extraordinary Ecological Disparity in the Phosphates of Morocco Just Prior to the K/Pg Crisis
by Nathalie Bardet, Valentin Fischer, Nour-Eddine Jalil, Fatima Khaldoune, Oussama Khadiri Yazami, Xabier Pereda-Suberbiola and Nicholas Longrich
Diversity 2025, 17(2), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17020114 - 4 Feb 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 6281
Abstract
Mosasaurid teeth are abundant in the fossil record and often diagnostic to low taxonomic levels, allowing to document the taxonomic diversity and ecological disparity through time and with fewer biases than in other marine reptiles. The upper Maastrichtian Phosphates of Morocco, with at [...] Read more.
Mosasaurid teeth are abundant in the fossil record and often diagnostic to low taxonomic levels, allowing to document the taxonomic diversity and ecological disparity through time and with fewer biases than in other marine reptiles. The upper Maastrichtian Phosphates of Morocco, with at least fifteen coeval species representing a wide range of sizes and morphologies, undoubtedly represent the richest outcrop in the world for this clade of iconic Mesozoic squamates and one of the richest known marine tetrapod assemblages. Until now, the methods used to link tooth morphology to diets in marine amniotes were mainly qualitative in nature. Here, using the dental morphology of mosasaurids from Morocco, we combine two complementary approaches—a thorough comparative anatomical description and 2D/3D geometric morphometry—to quantitatively categorize the main functions of these teeth during feeding processes and infer diet preferences and niche-partitioning of these apex predators. Our results from combining these two approaches show the following: (1) Mosasaurids from the upper Maastrichtian Phosphates of Morocco occupy the majority of dental guilds ever colonized by Mesozoic marine reptiles. (2) As seen elsewhere in the Maastrichtian, mosasaurines dominate the regional mosasaurid assemblage, exhibiting the greatest taxonomic diversity (two-thirds of the species) and the largest range of morphologies, body sizes (2 m to more than 10 m) and ecological disparities (participating in nearly all predatory ecological guilds); strikingly, mosasaurines did not developed flesh piercers and, conversely, are the only ones to include durophagous species. (3) Halisaurines, though known by species of very different sizes (small versus large) and cranial morphologies (gracile versus robust), maintain a single tooth shape (piercer). (4) Plioplatecarpines were medium-size cutters and piercers, known by very morphologically diverging species. (5) Tylosaurines currently remain scarce, represented by a very large generalist species; they were largely replaced by mosasaurines as apex predators over the course of the Maastrichtian, as observed elsewhere. Also, when comparing tooth shapes with body sizes, the largest taxa (>8 m long) occupied a restricted area of tooth shapes (generalist, durophagous), whereas small and medium-sized species (<8 m long) range across all of them (generalists, durophagous, cutters, piercers). In other words, and probably related to the specificities and advantages of biomechanical resistance, apex predators are never dedicated piercers, micro-predators are conversely never generalists, and meso-predators show the widest range of dental adaptations. These diversities and disparities strongly suggest that Tethyan mosasaurids evolved strong niche-partitioning in the shallow marine environment of the upper Maastrichtian Phosphates of Morocco. Such a high diversity sensu lato just prior to the K/Pg biological crisis suggests that their extinction was rather sudden, though the exact causes of their extinction remain unknown. Finally, Gavialimimus Strong et al., 2020 is systematically reassigned to Gavialimimus ptychodon (Arambourg, 1952), and an emended diagnosis (for teeth and dentition) is proposed for this species. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 453 KB  
Proceeding Paper
There Was No Mesozoic Marine Revolution
by Spencer G. Lucas and Adrian P. Hunt
Proceedings 2023, 87(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2022-14819 - 21 Jul 2023
Viewed by 4223
Abstract
The phrase “Mesozoic marine revolution” refers to the Mesozoic origin of durophagous predators and the co-evolutionary response of their prey as well as an increase in infaunalization. However, using “revolution” for a process that takes many tens of millions of years is semantically [...] Read more.
The phrase “Mesozoic marine revolution” refers to the Mesozoic origin of durophagous predators and the co-evolutionary response of their prey as well as an increase in infaunalization. However, using “revolution” for a process that takes many tens of millions of years is semantically improper hyperbole. Durophagous predators and their prey began to co-evolve by the Devonian, continued into the late Cenozoic and encompassed many distinct and convergent evolutionary events. Infaunalization has a similar prolonged and complex history. Identifying a single “revolution” confounds understanding of the multiple events and evolutionary convergences that took place, so “Mesozoic marine revolution” should be abandoned. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Geosciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3965 KB  
Article
Amplectobeluid Radiodont Guanshancaris gen. nov. from the Lower Cambrian (Stage 4) Guanshan Lagerstätte of South China: Biostratigraphic and Paleobiogeographic Implications
by Mingjing Zhang, Yu Wu, Weiliang Lin, Jiaxin Ma, Yuheng Wu and Dongjing Fu
Biology 2023, 12(4), 583; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040583 - 11 Apr 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5752
Abstract
Radiodonta, an extinct stem-euarthropod group, has been considered as the largest predator of Cambrian marine ecosystems. As one of the radiodont-bearing Konservat-Lagerstätten, the Guanshan biota (South China, Cambrian Stage 4) has yielded a diverse assemblage of soft-bodied and biomineralized taxa that are exclusive [...] Read more.
Radiodonta, an extinct stem-euarthropod group, has been considered as the largest predator of Cambrian marine ecosystems. As one of the radiodont-bearing Konservat-Lagerstätten, the Guanshan biota (South China, Cambrian Stage 4) has yielded a diverse assemblage of soft-bodied and biomineralized taxa that are exclusive to this exceptional deposit. “Anomalocariskunmingensis, the most abundant radiodont in the Guanshan biota, was originally assigned to Anomalocaris within the Anomalocarididae. Despite this taxon being formally assigned to the family Amplectobeluidae more recently, its generic assignment remains uncertain. Here, we present new materials of “Anomalocariskunmingensis from the Guanshan biota, and reveal that the frontal appendages possess two enlarged endites; all endites bear one posterior auxiliary spine and up to four anterior auxiliary spines; three robust dorsal spines and one terminal spine protrude from the distal part. These new observations, allied with anatomical features illustrated by previous studies, allow us to assign this taxon to a new genus, Guanshancaris gen. nov. Brachiopod shell bearing embayed injury and incomplete trilobites, associated with frontal appendages in our specimens, to some extent confirm Guanshancaris as a possible durophagous predator. The distribution of amplectobeluids demonstrates that this group is restricted to Cambrian Stage 3 to Drumian, and occurs across South China and Laurentia within the tropics/subtropics belt. Moreover, the amount and abundance of amplectobeluids evidently decreases after the Early–Middle Cambrian boundary, which indicates its possible preference for shallow water, referring to its paleoenvironmental distribution and may be influenced by geochemical, tectonic, and climatic variation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 13425 KB  
Review
Bradoriids (Arthropoda) and the Cambrian Diversification
by Mark A. S. McMenamin
Geosciences 2020, 10(4), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10040119 - 27 Mar 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 9176
Abstract
Bradoriids, among the earliest arthropods to appear in the fossil record, are extinct, ostracod-like bivalved forms that ranged from the early Cambrian to the Middle Ordovician. Bradoriids are notable for having appeared in the Cambrian fossil record before the earliest trilobites, and considering [...] Read more.
Bradoriids, among the earliest arthropods to appear in the fossil record, are extinct, ostracod-like bivalved forms that ranged from the early Cambrian to the Middle Ordovician. Bradoriids are notable for having appeared in the Cambrian fossil record before the earliest trilobites, and considering their rapid ascent to high genus-level diversity, provide key data for our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of the Cambrian Explosion. This paper presents a broad review of bradoriid paleobiology. It is hypothesized here that an allele of Antennapedia determines whether bradoriid shields are preplete, amplete, or postplete. The preplete configuration of the shields of Cambroarchilocus tigris gen. nov. sp. nov. suggests that shield rowing motion may have propelled the animal backwards. Arcuate scars attributed here to a microdurophagous predator (Arcuoichnus pierci nov. ichnogen. nov. ichnosp.) occur on the paratype of Cambroarchilocus tigris gen. nov. sp. nov. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2020: A 10 Years Journey-Advances in Geosciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop