Search Results (1,085)

Urban tourism is frequently promoted as a driver of regeneration, competitiveness, and local economic growth. However, its expansion increasingly generates overtourism, environmental degradation, social inequality, gentrification pressures, and cultural commodification in densely populated cities. Although existing tourism research has examined these challenges from managerial, planning, and sustainability perspectives, less attention has been paid to their ethical foundations. This conceptual paper addresses that gap by developing an integrated ethical framework for sustainable urban tourism through a structured, theory-driven synthesis of literature in environmental ethics, social justice theory, virtue ethics, and urban tourism studies. The paper makes three main contributions: it reframes urban tourism growth as a moral and normative issue rather than merely an economic one; it organizes the key ethical dilemmas of urban tourism as interconnected outcomes of growth-oriented development; and it links ethical principles to stakeholder responsibilities and desired governance outcomes. The proposed framework positions tourists, businesses, and policymakers as moral agents and identifies ecological integrity, social equity, and cultural protection as core criteria for evaluating tourism development. As a conceptual study, however, the framework remains theoretical and requires future empirical application and testing across different urban contexts. Full article

This article examines The Mark of Cassandra by Chingiz Aitmatov through the emerging framework of Blue Humanities. While most prior studies have approached Aitmatov’s ecological concerns from a land-based ecocritical perspective, this article shifts the focus to his engagement with oceanic themes and marine environments. By combining literary interpretation with ecological philosophy, the study suggests that The Mark of Cassandra goes beyond the limits of traditional environmental fiction. It presents the ocean not only as a setting but as a source of knowledge and ethical reflection. In this way, Aitmatov’s work seems to anticipate current global discussions on climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental justice. The novel encourages readers to reconsider the human-centered worldview and adopt a more ecocentric approach. Through its marine symbolism and critical stance on human exploitation of nature, the text offers valuable insights into ecological ethics that cross both national and species boundaries. Overall, this article argues that The Mark of Cassandra is an important literary contribution that challenges the usual borders of ecocriticism and calls for a more integrated and holistic understanding of environmental issues. Full article

This study presents a comprehensive and systematic integrative review of Neighborhood-Level Energy Hubs (NLEHs) as pivotal enablers of sustainable and resilient urban energy systems. In response to accelerating climate pressures, rapid urbanization, and the decentralization of energy production, NLEHs are conceptualized as multi-carrier platforms that enable coordinated energy generation, storage, conversion, and exchange at the neighborhood scale. Utilizing a PRISMA-informed methodology to synthesize 125 core studies, the review systematically evaluates recent advances across five interconnected dimensions: conceptual foundations, system typologies, energy flow architectures, urban integration, and optimization paradigms. Unlike conventional reviews, this study explicitly bridges the critical gap between techno-economic optimization and socio-environmental priorities. A key novelty is the proposed mathematical integration of energy justice and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) directly into optimization algorithms (e.g., MILP and MPC) as dynamic constraints and penalty terms. Particular emphasis is placed on participatory governance models, lifecycle sustainability metrics, and digitalization tools such as AI-driven energy management systems and urban digital twins. The analysis further reveals critical research gaps, highlighting a stark geographic dichotomy between high-tech, market-driven NLEHs in the Global North and resilience-oriented hybrid microgrids in the Global South, alongside the lack of adaptive regulatory frameworks. By proposing a unified Cyber–Physical–Social perspective, this study provides actionable insights for planners, policymakers, and researchers to support the development of scalable, inclusive, and context-sensitive NLEH implementations. Ultimately, the paper contributes to redefining neighborhood-scale energy systems as not only efficient and low-carbon infrastructures, but also as socially equitable, globally scalable, and institutionally adaptive components of future smart cities. Full article

This study explores the environmental justice issues associated with landfill compensation policies in Bantargebang, Indonesia. Although compensation programs have been implemented for many years, communities living near landfills continue to experience ongoing environmental damage and significant health concerns. Using a qualitative descriptive method, this research explores systemic barriers through in-depth interviews, observations, and water quality analysis. The findings indicate that labeling the program as “Social Assistance” within the Local Government Information System (SIPD) redefines ecological compensation as a fixed form of charity, rather than as a mechanism for genuine environmental restitution. Laboratory data show severe bacteriological contamination, with Total Coliform levels reaching 95%, forcing residents to bear substantial “hidden costs” for clean water, perpetuating a cycle of financial dependence. The growing normalization of health hazards is evident in over 5000 annual cases of acute respiratory infections, and the deadly landslide in March 2026, in which claimed seven lives and injured six others. These incidents underscore the failure of existing remediation approaches to safeguard human dignity and well-being. To address these shortcomings, this study proposes the adoption of an Integrated Compensation Model based on Green Social Work. This model emphasizes structural investment, spatial risk-based indices using quantitative data, and budget coding adjustments within the SIPD. This approach highlights the urgent need to move beyond temporary charitable assistance and instead pursue meaningful environmental justice, while positioning social workers as “Social-Ecological Brokers” who help restore dignity and well-being in communities often treated as “sacrifice zones.” Full article

Equitable prioritization of public investments is increasingly critical as municipalities face constrained budgets, heterogeneous neighborhood needs, and demands for transparent decisions. This paper proposes a fairness-aware group multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for ranking municipal infrastructure investments when budgets are constrained, and neighborhood needs differ. Six alternatives are assessed in the Istanbul case study: flood risk mitigation, inclusive public realm and cooling, smart and energy-efficient municipal assets, walking and cycling infrastructure, healthcare access improvements, and seismic retrofitting of public buildings. The criteria system combines efficiency, implementability, socio-environmental performance, and equity-oriented priorities through five main dimensions and 23 sub-criteria. In addition to cost, feasibility, and service effectiveness, the framework incorporates fairness-related criteria such as baseline need and deficit severity, vulnerability-targeting effectiveness, minimum service guarantee for the worst-off, and priority for low-accessibility centers. Public acceptance and environmental performance are also included. Stakeholder panels provide expert judgments using intuitionistic fuzzy sets, capturing membership, non-membership, and hesitation to reflect uncertainty. Criteria weights are derived with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IF-SWARA), enabling importance elicitation and group aggregation without forcing crisp consensus. Alternatives are then ranked using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (IF-CoCoSo), which blends additive and multiplicative compromise solutions to balance overall performance with equity objectives. Robustness is assessed through sensitivity analysis by varying the γ parameter within the IF-CoCoSo procedure. A municipal case study demonstrates that healthcare access improvements achieve the highest compromise performance, followed by flood risk mitigation and seismic retrofitting of public buildings, while smart and energy-efficient municipal assets rank last. The findings confirm that explicitly embedding fairness criteria can shift municipal priorities toward alternatives that more directly reduce deprivation, risk, and spatial inequality. The main contribution of this study is not merely empirical application, but the development of a fairness-aware group MCDM framework that operationalizes distributive justice in municipal investment prioritization through a structured set of criteria. Full article

Wicked problems spanning systemic educational inequities, economic disparities, and environmental sustainability resist most traditional change efforts. This theory-building article advances a systems explanation that introduces complex conceptual systems theory which models collective conceptualizations as complex adaptive systems composed of densely interconnected ideas. These systems stabilize around attractor states that generate emergent potentials for what becomes sayable, seeable, doable, and valuable, thereby constraining the very practices needed for transformation. The article defines core constructs and articulates operational principles for diagnosis and intervention in complex social and socio-technical systems. It then specifies a first-generation analytical workflow, complex conceptual systems analysis (CCSA), that integrates qualitative coding with network-based modeling to map conceptual architectures, identify attractor states, and locate leverage points where sustained pressure can catalyze system reorganization. Empirical grounding is provided through a synthesis of a decade-long research program reported in prior publications across multiple domains, rather than through a single new empirical dataset. Accordingly, the manuscript is organized as a theory-development and methodology contribution, moving from conceptual architecture to operational principles, analytic workflow, and cross-domain exemplars. The theory offers systems science a pragmatic, justice-attentive approach for anticipatory, intervention-oriented change in entrenched wicked problems. Full article

Urban neighborhood parks are essential infrastructure for sustainable cities, supporting physical and mental health, social cohesion, and climate adaptation. Equity-oriented park planning, however, requires accurate identification of residents who can access parks within network-constrained travel time thresholds. Many accessibility studies estimate served populations using coarse administrative zones and areal-weighting assumptions, which can bias results in heterogeneous, vertically developed districts. This study develops a building-based population allocation framework (implemented via a building centroid overlay) that integrates Statistics Korea’s census output areas (2023 Q4 release) with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT)’s GIS Integrated Building Information database (2023 Q4 release) and applies it to Yongsan-gu (Yongsan District), Seoul. Park entrances were verified and digitized using street-view imagery available on multiple web map platforms, and walkable service areas (5 and 10 min) were delineated via network analysis. Potential service coverage and unserved population were then estimated under three spatial configurations—administrative dong (neighborhood-level administrative unit in Seoul; hereafter administrative unit), census output area, and building-based allocation—and compared. Under the 10 min scenario, the unserved share reached 24.6% at the administrative unit level but decreased to 5.9% and 4.3% when using census output areas and building-based allocation, respectively. The building-based approach additionally revealed micro-scale clusters of unserved residents near localized pedestrian constraints and boundary-crossing areas that are obscured by zone-based methods. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of access-based potential service coverage diagnostics to spatial unit choice and population disaggregation and suggest that building-based population allocation can improve the targeting of park pro-vision policies and promote spatial equity in dense, vertically developed cities. Full article

In Latin America, sustainable commitments towards decarbonizing hard-to-abate industrial sectors have identified hydrogen (H2) as a key enabler for the energy transition. This study develops a policy analytical framework to enhance the green H2 economy, using Argentina as the central case study. Key insights from this study include identifying often-overlooked social challenges within the H2 economy and proposing the integration of social indicators into policy design, with a particular focus on the territorial dynamics of Patagonia, labor conditions, Indigenous participation, governance, and community impacts. Drawing from Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) guideline standards and H2 justice approach, this study highlights key social hotspots that existing S-LCA tools overlook due to their lack of specific focus on regional territories and their communities. The analysis combines six social impact categories, namely, human rights, working conditions, health and safety, cultural heritage, governance, and socio-economic repercussions as recommended by the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), analyzed at three levels, and complemented by the H2 justice approach for Argentina’s potential green H2 production sector. These policy recommendations aim to foster a more resilient and sustainable development of the green H2 industry. Full article

In order to reach net-zero by 2050, we need to have strong decarbonization policies, especially in hard-to-abate clean-ups like steel (8% of the global emissions), cement (7%), and power generation (30%), and negative emissions through direct air capture (DAC) and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). This review paper summarizes the progress in CO₂ capture, compression, transportation, and storage technologies between 2020 and 2025, including energy penalty (20–40%) and cost (15–30%) reductions, with innovations such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), bio-inspired catalysts, ionic liquids, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based optimization. This paper, as a new input into the carbon capture and storage (CCS) field, uses the Weighted Sum Model (WSM) as a multi-criteria decision-making tool to rank the best technologies in the capture, storage, monitoring, and transportation sectors. The weights of the criteria are calculated based on Shannon entropy, and the assessment is performed in three conditions, namely, optimistic, pessimistic, and expected. The weights are computed with sensitivity analysis to make the assessment robust. The viability of key projects, such as Northern Lights (Norway, 1.5 MtCO₂/year), Porthos (The Netherlands, 2.5 MtCO₂/year), Quest (Canada, 1 MtCO₂/year), and Petra Nova (USA, 1.6 MtCO₂/year), is evident, and it is projected that, globally, CCS will reach 49 MtCO₂/year across 43 plants in 2025. The review incorporates socio-economic and environmental justice, including barriers such as high costs ($30–600/MtCO₂), energy penalties (1–10 GJ/tCO₂), and opposition between people (20–40% in EU/US). In comparison with previous reviews, this article has a more comprehensive focus, provides quantitative synthesis through WSM, and discusses the implications for researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders towards achieving faster CCS implementation on the path to net-zero. Full article

Contemporary societies are facing converging crises, including environmental degradation, worsening social inequalities, aging populations, and increasingly costly healthcare systems, prompting sustainable health to be proposed as an integrative conceptual perspective for rethinking health, its determinants, and collective action. This narrative review aims to trace the historical evolution of the concept, clarify the vision it offers for public health, and identify its implications for research, policy, and intervention. A literature search (May 2025) was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Google, with no restrictions on language, time period, or document type. Of 40 relevant documents, 21 were selected for in-depth analysis by two independent reviewers, with duplicate data extraction. The results show that sustainable health broadens the World Health Organisation (WHO) definition of health by incorporating sustainability, intergenerational justice, ecological limits, and social equity. Close to, but distinct from Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth, sustainable health is based on ecological, social and ethical, economic, behavioral, intergenerational, and systemic/intersectoral dimensions. Sustainable health thus emerges as a systemic and transdisciplinary conceptual approach for transforming health systems, living environments, and public policy, requiring further conceptual clarification, robust interdisciplinary research programs, and intersectoral initiatives involving communities. Full article

To advance the Sustainable Development Goals, it is essential to correct imbalances in how the benefits of urban trees are distributed across different demographic and socioeconomic groups. Environmental justice studies have frequently overlooked assumptions regarding the data-generating process and have not considered spatial confounding. This oversight potentially misestimates patterns of inequity. This study evaluates the sensitivity of inequity to model assumptions using urban tree inventories from Málaga and Sevilla and Bayesian hierarchical models. City-level differences dominated the inequity patterns, and model specification influenced the magnitude, precision, and credibility of estimated effects, though directionality remained consistent. Patterns were highly consistent across the four ecosystem services, indicating that model assumptions affected all services equivalently. Málaga and Seville exhibited divergent inequity patterns, indicating that local urban context mediates these relationships. In Seville, inequity patterns were inconsistent with the luxury hypothesis and occurred primarily across age-based demographic strata, whereas in Málaga they manifested predominantly along ethnicity, with weaker evidence of income inequities. We advocate for explicitly modeling spatial data-generating processes and comparing conventional versus confounding-mitigated approaches. This city-specific rigor is essential for urban planners to prevent resource misallocation, ensuring that tree-planting strategies address genuine inequities rather than methodological biases. Full article

This article critically analyses Lisbon’s Green Participatory Budget (GPB), launched in 2020 within the symbolic context of the city’s designation as the European Green Capital. Rather than treating the GPB as a radical democratic innovation, the study situates it as a thematic and digital reconfiguration of Lisbon’s long-standing participatory budgeting process, which has been active since 2008 and already incorporated environmental dimensions. Drawing on critical urban studies, political ecology, and literature on participatory governance, the analysis explores the democratic and justice implications of digital participatory climate governance. The article identifies structural limitations in the design and implementation of the GPB, including technocratic gatekeeping, digital exclusion, restricted deliberation, and the significant involvement of private sector consultancies. Beyond these internal constraints, the article argues that the most critical limitation of Lisbon’s GPB lies in its lack of continuity. Despite the mobilization of financial resources and public expectations, the GPB was not renewed after 2021, nor were its outcomes systematically evaluated or integrated into long-term governance strategies. This discontinuation compromises the potential of participatory climate governance as a learning process and raises broader questions about symbolic policy-making, institutional memory, and democratic accountability in urban climate action. The study concludes by proposing a set of redistributive and justice-oriented principles to restructure participatory mechanisms toward genuine climate democracy. Full article

In Southern Chile, sewer- and septic tank-based sanitation dominates public discourse and expectations, while in practice it often fails under local environmental and social conditions. This study explores the adoption of composting toilets by households as a practical response to these challenges. Drawing on autoethnographic and ethnographic research (2020–2026) in the Los Lagos Region, it examines how people implement composting toilets and the transformative potential and limits of living with these infrastructures. By situating composting toilets within global imaginaries of ecological, sustainable, and circular sanitation, it suggests that they have the potential to act as socioenvironmental cauteries—localized efforts to contain harm and sustain life. Composting toilets in this study reshape relations among excrement, bodies, and environments while depending on individual initiative, technical know-how, and social privilege. Thus, they can reinforce neoliberal rationales of individual responsibility for collective issues that ultimately require structural changes. The study concludes that just and sustainable sanitation requires support for user-driven innovations and the development of frameworks adapted to local socioecological contexts, while actively addressing social inequalities. Full article

This study developed and tested a neighborhood-scale framework that integrates unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral mapping and georeferenced socioeconomic data to identify inequities in urban green infrastructure and translate them into an operational prioritization tool for inclusive planning. Using object-based image analysis, impervious surfaces, low vegetation, and woody vegetation (trees and shrubs) were mapped across 33 Neighborhood Units in Temuco, Chile, and landscape metrics describing dominance, edge, isolation/connectivity, and diversity were derived. Socioeconomic conditions were summarized through Principal Component Analysis, and their relationships with vegetation metrics were evaluated using Generalized Additive Models. The results revealed strongly nonlinear and metric-specific associations, with the most robust relationships observed for woody-structure metrics, particularly total woody edge and built-environment isolation, whereas landscape diversity showed weaker but still significant dependence on resource-access gradients. To support inclusive planning, a dimensionless Green Infrastructure Prioritization Index (GIPI) was computed by combining standardized green deficit and standardized social vulnerability with equal weights. GIPI values ranged from 0.318 to 0.740 (median = 0.528), identifying 11 high-priority units characterized by higher social vulnerability and less favorable woody structure, including lower largest-patch dominance and greater isolation. Sensitivity analyses varying the deficit weight from 0.30 to 0.70 showed that 10 of the 11 high-priority units remained in the same class in at least 80% of weighting scenarios, indicating a stable priority set. Further classification of high-priority units according to dominant deficit type supported a staged intervention strategy, in which woody canopy is first increased in deficit nodes and subsequently reinforced through corridor-oriented greening to improve structural connectivity. These findings demonstrate the value of coupling fine-scale vegetation mapping with socioeconomic gradients to support more equitable urban green infrastructure planning. Full article

Schools are increasingly recognised as critical public infrastructure for urban climate adaptation, particularly in heat-vulnerable and park-poor neighbourhoods. This study examines schoolyards as distributed cooling systems, social spaces, and educational landscapes and proposes an integrated decision support approach for programme comparison and prioritisation. A comparative review of nine international schoolyard transformation programmes (Paris, Barcelona, Madrid, Milan, Rotterdam, Los Angeles, New York, Melbourne, and Santiago de Chile) was conducted using municipal plans, reports, and implementation guidance. Design strategies, governance configurations, and monitoring approaches were synthesised through a CAME (Correct, Adapt, Maintain, Explore) framework. Building on this synthesis, a Multicriteria Analysis framework was developed to support prioritisation across four criteria families: environmental and climatic performance, social and educational equity, urban integration and accessibility, and feasibility and co-benefits. The results highlight a recurrent toolkit of interventions—depaving, tree planting, shade provision, cool and permeable surfaces, nature-based drainage systems, and monitoring practices—that is consistently associated in the reviewed evidence with improved thermal comfort, stormwater performance, biodiversity, and community use beyond school hours. It is concluded that a combined CAME–Multicriteria Analysis structure provides a transferable basis for transparent, criteria-based prioritisation of schoolyard interventions by local governments and school authorities. Full article