Search Results (108)

Introduction: Sex-specific differences in psychopharmacological treatment have gained increasing attention in adults, with studies showing that women often have higher serum concentrations of psychotropic drugs due to biological differences. However, despite recognition of these differences in adults, reference ranges for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in general, but even more sex-specific therapeutic windows for psychotropic drugs, are lacking in children and adolescents, who may metabolize and respond to medications differently. Aim: The study aimed to investigate sex-specific differences in antidepressant (AD) and antipsychotic (AP) -treatment outcomes, and pharmacokinetics in childhood/adolescence. In particular, we examined differences in AD and AP serum levels and clinical effects, including adverse drug effects (ADEs) and therapeutic effectiveness. Methods: This study is part of the multicenter “TDM-VIGIL” pharmacovigilance project, which prospectively followed patients aged 6–18 years treated with AD and AP across 18 child psychiatric centers in German-speaking countries from 2014 to 2018. Clinical data, including drug concentrations (AD: fluoxetine, mirtazapine, (es)citalopram, sertraline; AP: aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone), were collected using an internet-based registry, and treatment outcomes and ADEs were assessed during routine visits. Statistical analyses were performed to examine sex differences in pharmacokinetics and clinical responses, adjusting for age, weight, and other confounders. Results: A total of 705 patients (66.5% girls, 24.7% <14 years, mean age of 14.6 years) were included. Female patients were slightly older, had lower body weight, and were more often diagnosed with depression and anorexia nervosa, while boys were more frequently diagnosed with hyperkinetic disorders and atypical autism. We found no sex differences in the serum concentrations of investigated drugs when adjusted for age and weight. In fluoxetine treatment in patients diagnosed with mood (affective) disorders, female sex was associated with the probability for very good therapy response (p = 0.04), as well as with moderate treatment response (p = 0.02) compared to no treatment response. Discussion: Our findings suggest that sex may not affect serum levels of investigated AD and AP in children/adolescents. However, treatment outcome of fluoxetine was associated with sex, with higher probability for a better outcome in female patients diagnosed with mood (affective) disorders. Full article

Background/Objectives: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), widely prescribed for anxiety disorders, may negatively impact the gut microbiota, contributing to dysbiosis. Considering the gut–brain axis’s importance in mental health, probiotics could represent an effective adjunctive strategy. This study evaluated the effects of Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 on microbiota composition, metabolic activity, and immune markers in fecal samples from patients with anxiety on SSRIs, using the SHIME^® (Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem) model. Methods: The fecal microbiotas of four patients using sertraline or escitalopram were inoculated in SHIME^® reactors simulating the ascending colon. After stabilization, a 14-day probiotic intervention was performed. Microbial composition was assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), ammonia, and GABA were measured, along with the prebiotic index (PI). Intestinal barrier integrity was evaluated via transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), and cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α) were analyzed using a Caco-2/THP-1 co-culture system. The statistical design employed in this study for the analysis of prebiotic index, metabolites, intestinal barrier integrity and cytokines levels was a repeated measures ANOVA, complemented by post hoc Tukey’s tests to assess differences across treatment groups. For the 16S rRNA sequencing data, alpha diversity was assessed using multiple metrics, including the Shannon, Simpson, and Fisher indices to evaluate species diversity, and the Chao1 and ACE indices to estimate species richness. Beta diversity, which measures microbiota similarity across groups, was analyzed using weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances. To assess significant differences in beta diversity between groups, a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed using the Adonis test. Results: Probiotic supplementation increased Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and decreased Klebsiella and Bacteroides. Beta diversity was significantly altered, while alpha diversity remained unchanged. SCFA levels increased after 7 days. Ammonia levels dropped, and PI values rose. TEER values indicated enhanced barrier integrity. IL-8 and TNF-α decreased, while IL-6 increased. GABA levels remained unchanged. Conclusions: The probiotic combination of Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 modulated gut microbiota composition, metabolic activity, and inflammatory responses in samples from individuals with anxiety on SSRIs, supporting its potential as an adjunctive strategy to mitigate antidepressant-associated dysbiosis. However, limitations—including the small pooled-donor sample, the absence of a healthy control group, and a lack of significant GABA modulation—should be considered when interpreting the findings. Although the SHIME^® model is considered a gold standard for microbiota studies, further clinical trials are necessary to confirm these promising results. Full article

Background: Depression, a major global health issue, is commonly treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Given the link between depression and inflammation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may have adjunctive benefits. Clinically, SSRIs and NSAIDs are often co-prescribed for comorbid pain or inflammatory conditions. However, both drug classes pose risks of adverse effects, and their interaction may lead to clinically significant drug–drug interactions. Objectives: This study analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data (2004–2024) to assess gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) potential risks linked to SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline) and NSAIDs (propionic/acetic/enolic acid derivatives, COX-2 inhibitors) in depression patients, alone and combined. Methods: Disproportionality analysis (crude reporting odds ratios, cROR) identified possible associations; drug interactions were evaluated using Ω shrinkage, additive, multiplicative, and combination risk ratio (CRR) models. Results: Gastrointestinal bleeding risk was potentially elevated with citalopram (cROR = 2.81), escitalopram (2.27), paroxetine (2.17), fluvoxamine (3.58), sertraline (1.69), and propionic acid NSAIDs (3.17). Thrombocytopenia showed a potential correlation with fluoxetine (2.11) and paroxetine (2.68). AKI risk may be increased with citalopram (1.39), escitalopram (1.36), fluvoxamine (3.24), and COX-2 inhibitors (2.24). DDI signal analysis suggested that citalopram in combination with propionic acid derivatives (additive model = 0.01, multiplicative model = 1.14, and CRR = 3.13) might increase the risk of bleeding. Paroxetine combined with NSAIDs (additive model = 0.014, multiplicative model = 2.65, and CRR = 2.99) could potentially increase the risk of thrombocytopenia. Sertraline combined with NSAIDs (Ω₀₂₅ = 0.94, multiplicative model = 2.14) might be associated with an increasing risk of AKI. Citalopram combined with propionic acid derivatives (Ω₀₂₅ = 1.08, multiplicative model = 2.17, and CRR = 2.42) could be associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury. Conclusions: Certain combinations of SSRIs and NSAIDs might further elevate these risks of gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury in patients with depression. Given the potential drug–drug interactions, heightened clinical vigilance is advised when prescribing SSRIs and NSAIDs in combination to patients with depression. Full article

Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most commonly prescribed antidepressants and are generally considered safe. However, emerging data suggest a potential association with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), especially among elderly patients and those on anticoagulation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reports up to May 2025 listing an SSRI (sertraline, fluoxetine, paroxetine, escitalopram, citalopram, or fluvoxamine) as a suspect or interacting drug and involving an ICH event were included. Disproportionality was assessed using reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Among 226 eligible ICH cases, sertraline (30.5%), paroxetine (28.8%), and fluoxetine (27.9%) were most frequently implicated. Sertraline showed a strong signal for cerebral hemorrhage (ROR = 4.97), while fluoxetine was associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (ROR = 4.51). Sertraline had a pronounced signal among patients aged >60 years (ROR = 7.92) and in combination with anticoagulants (ROR = 9.56). Fluoxetine was underrepresented in elderly cases. Given the very small number of fluvoxamine-related cases (n = 2), interpretation should be cautious due to limited statistical power. Gender-stratified analyses showed female predominance in sertraline-related ICH and male predominance for paroxetine. Citalopram demonstrated a potentially protective profile with inverse association with cerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions: This study highlights significant differences in ICH reporting patterns across SSRIs, modified by patient age, gender, and co-medication. These findings underscore the need for individualized SSRI prescribing, particularly in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy particularly in elderly patients and those receiving anticoagulant therapy, where sertraline and fluoxetine may pose increased risk. Full article

Sceletium tortuosum (ST) induces antidepressant and anxiolytic effects, purportedly by monoamine regulation, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibition. These multimodal actions have not been demonstrated in an animal model of major depressive disorder. Wistar rats (both sexes) were subjected to 8-week unpredictable chronic mild stress, subsequently receiving saline, a standardized ST extract, Zembrin^® 25 and 12.5 mg/kg (ZEM25 and ZEM12.5), its primary alkaloid mesembrine (MES), or escitalopram (20 mg/kg) for 36 days. Sucrose preference, open field, Barnes maze, and forced swim tests were performed, with cortico-hippocampal monoamines, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers analyzed post-mortem. Male, but not female rats, presented with increased anhedonia and anxiety but not despair. Males presented with increased hippocampal PDE4B expression, increased dopamine metabolites, and decreased cortical serotonin. In males, ZEM12.5 decreased anhedonia- and anxiety-like behavior, decreased cortical and hippocampal PDE4B, and increased plasma interleukin-10. MES induced a transient decrease in anhedonia-like behavior and increased hippocampal serotonergic and cortical dopaminergic activity, whilst decreasing hippocampal PDE4B. ZEM25 increased plasma interleukin-10 but decreased cortical glutathione, indicating paradoxical anti-inflammatory and prooxidant effects. ZEM12.5 and MES more effectively addressed anxious–depressive-like behavior and stress-induced inflammation and monoaminergic alterations, respectively. Multitargeted actions on monoamines, redox-inflammation, and PDE4 may provide ST with antidepressant effects across multiple symptom domains, although mutually synergistic/antagonistic effects of constituent alkaloids should be considered. Full article

Backgrounds and Objectives: This study aims to characterize the prevalence and severity of antidepressant-associated adverse drug events (ADEs) and to identify predictors strongly associated with serious adverse events (SAEs). Materials and Methods: Disproportionality analysis on antidepressant-related ADEs spontaneously reported to the Korea Adverse event Reporting System (KIDS KAERS DB) from 2014 to 2023 was performed. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors associated with SAEs. Sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the overall findings and assess the robustness of associations across subgroups defined by completeness of demographic data (age and sex), elderly age-stratification, and causality assessment. The study protocol was approved by the Kyung Hee University institutional review board. Results: Among 21,103 antidepressant-related ADEs, duloxetine was the most etiologic medication, followed by amitriptyline and escitalopram. Fluoxetine is the only agent with a high likelihood of reporting SAEs. ADEs involving vascular (extracardiac) disorders (ROR 42.42, 95% CI 13.19–136.42) and liver and biliary system disorders (ROR 7.84, 95% CI 3.77–16.29) were most likely to be SAEs. The predictors associated with substantial increased SAE risk were fluoxetine use (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.68–4.39), male sex (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11–1.98), and concomitant administration of antiparkinsonian treatment (OR 8.29, 95% CI 3.61–19.06) and antidementia treatment (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.34–6.05). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar and consistent findings. However, reversed trends in the association between SOC-based ADEs and sex were observed in the sensitivity analysis restricted to cases with “certain” and “probable” causality. Conclusions: The type of antidepressant, concomitant medications, and sex are major predictors for SAE risk. Further controlled studies on the impact of comorbidities and polypharmacy on antidepressant-related SAEs are warranted. Full article

Background/Objectives: Depression ranks among the most prevalent mental health conditions globally, marked by a variety of symptoms that frequently cause significant emotional distress and impairment in individuals, alongside a high recurrence rate. The predominant approach to treating depression revolves around monoamine theory, utilizing SSRIs and SNRIs, with Esketamine emerging as a supplementary option in recent times. Nevertheless, there is a growing focus on exploring the relationship between inflammation and depression, revealing a strong correlation between the two. This insight prompts consideration of the anti-inflammatory properties of current antidepressants in their therapeutic application. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical trials (CTs) that assessed the in vivo anti-inflammatory effects of SSRIs (fluoxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, and paroxetine), the SNRI venlafaxine, and esketamine/ketamine in human subjects undergoing treatment for depression. The included studies were evaluated based on changes in levels of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers in response to the antidepressant treatments. Results: SSRIs, SNRIs, esketamine, and ketamine (a racemic mixture of S- and R-ketamine not formally approved for the treatment of depression) exhibit anti-inflammatory effects through diverse mechanisms, such as reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines or enhancing anti-inflammatory cytokines in serum or within specific brain regions like the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. These actions are mediated through various inflammatory pathways, including nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), the brain Nod-like receptor pyrin-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, the glutamatergic system, the gut–brain axis, the hypothalamic–pituitary axis, impaired neuroplasticity, and the kynurenine pathway. Conclusions: In summary, SSRIs, SNRIs, esketamine, and ketamine exert an anti-inflammatory role alongside their antidepressant effects via these intricate mechanisms. Full article

Background/Objectives: OCD is a chronic psychiatric disorder, often requiring long-term pharmacological treatment. Although selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are considered first-line agents, 40 to 60% of patients show only partial or no response when treated at standard dosages. In such cases, supratherapeutic doses of SSRIs have been proposed as an alternative strategy. However, the evidence supporting this approach remains limited and fragmented. This review aims to evaluate the rationale, clinical efficacy, tolerability, and practical considerations associated with high-dose SSRI use in OCD. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using targeted literature searches in PubMed and Scopus. Studies were included if they reported on the use of high-dose SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline) in patients with OCD and provided efficacy and/or tolerability data. Clinical trials, observational studies, and case reports were all reviewed. Results: Evidence shows that higher doses of SSRIs are significantly more effective than low or medium doses in reducing OCD symptoms—especially in individuals who have only partially responded to standard treatment. Smaller clinical studies and case reports have also demonstrated that supratherapeutic dosing, beyond typical regulatory limits, can be both effective and well tolerated in treatment-resistant OCD. Conclusions: High-dose SSRI treatment may be a valuable option for selected OCD patients who do not respond to standard therapy. However, careful patient selection, regular monitoring, and further controlled studies are necessary to better define its long-term safety and effectiveness. In this context, increasingly advanced technologies—such as therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing for relevant polymorphisms—may support more individualized and safer treatment strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Mental diseases are one of the leading groups of health disorders worldwide, with depressive and anxiety disorders being the most prevalent. Depressive disorders can be treated with pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or a combination of both. In cases where these approaches prove ineffective, electroconvulsive therapy may be considered as an alternative. The drugs of choice for treating depressive disorders are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In the Republic of Serbia, commonly prescribed SSRIs include fluoxetine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram. Methods: Data on drug sales for human medicine from the Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices of Serbia (ALIMS) were used for the analysis of consumption in the period 2018–2022. Data on drug consumption in other European countries were obtained from the respective national registers. Results: From 2018 to 2021, sertraline was the best-selling drug in this group, but with a statistically significant decrease (R² = 0.7948, p = 0.042), while escitalopram showed a statistically significant increase (p = 0.006) and became the best-selling drug in the SSRI group in 2022. Overall, SSRI group consumption fluctuated from 2018 to 2022, with the highest values in 2020. However, these variations were not statistically significant (p = 0.6223). Compared to Serbia, out of 12 European countries, 8 had higher and 4 had lower consumption in 2019 and 2020. A positive correlation was found between antidepressant consumption and GDP per capita. Conclusions: Sertraline was the most commonly prescribed SSRI drug in Serbia from 2018 to 2021. However, in 2022, escitalopram became the most commonly used drug in this group both in Serbia and worldwide, with a consistent increase in consumption. Full article

Both Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and depression are leading causes of disability despite T2DM being largely preventable and depression being among the most treatable mental health conditions. Diabetes and depression have a bidirectional association, with each condition worsening the development and progression of the other. Depression in patients with diabetes is linked with poor glycemic control, reduced treatment adherence, and increased risk of diabetes complications. On the other hand, chronic hyperglycemia, systemic inflammation, insulin resistance, and neuroendocrine dysregulation are involved in the pathophysiology of depression. Antidepressants are often used to treat depression in diabetic patients, but their metabolic impact is still a matter of concern. While some antidepressants like fluoxetine and escitalopram increase insulin sensitivity and improve glycemic parameters, others such as especially tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been associated with an increased risk of diabetes, weight gain, and poor cardiometabolic outcomes. Considering such complexities, the prescribing of antidepressants must be done carefully. This review underscores the need for evidence-based and patient-centric pharmacological management. Further, the inclusion of psychiatry in multidisciplinary diabetes care teams has the potential to maximize both metabolic and psychological health benefits, as well as reduce the complications of T2DM. Full article

Background: Antidepressants are a class of pharmaceuticals utilized for the management of many psychiatric disorders, including depression. A considerable number of antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), have been documented to demonstrate significant anticancer properties in various cancer cell lines. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the selective cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of escitalopram oxalate (ES) alone and in combination with etoposide (ET) on ET-resistant A549 (A549/90E) lung cancer cells. Methods: The cytotoxic effects of the drugs were determined by CCK-8, trypan blue, and neutral red assays. Apoptosis was observed by Annexin V fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/PI and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) assays. Moreover, the effects of the drugs, alone and in combination, on apoptosis-related proteins, caspase-3, PTEN, and resistance-related P-gP were determined by ELISA. The relationship between drugs and lung cancer was determined with protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Results: Our results revealed that ES significantly exerted cytotoxic effects on both wild-type and A549/90E cells compared with BEAS-2B cells. The IC₅₀ values of 48.67 and 51.6 μg/mL obtained for ET and ES, respectively, at the end of 24 h of incubation for A549 cells were applied reciprocally for each cell by including BEAS-2B together with the 2xIC₅₀ and ½ IC₅₀ values. The results of each combination were statistically evaluated with combination indices (CIs) obtained using the Compusyn synergistic effect analysis program. Combination doses with a synergistic effect in A549 and A549/90E cells and an antagonistic effect in BEAS-2B cells have been determined as ½ IC₅₀ for ET and ½ IC₅₀ for ES. ET ½ IC₅₀, ES ½ IC₅₀, and an ET ½ IC₅₀ + ES ½ IC₅₀ combination caused 18.37%, 55.19%, and 57.55% death in A549 cells, whereas they caused 44.9%, 22.4%, and 51.94% death in A549/90E cells, respectively. In A549 cells, the combination of ES ½ IC₅₀ and ET ½ IC₅₀ caused increased levels of caspase-3 (p < 0.01) and P-gP (p < 0.001), while PTEN levels remained unchanged. The combination resulted in an increase in caspase-3 (p < 0.001) and PTEN (p < 0.001) amounts, alongside a decrease in P-gP (p < 0.01) levels in A549/90E cells. The death mechanism induced by the combination was found to be apoptotic by Annexin V-FITC and ΔΨm assays. Conclusions: Based on our findings, ES was observed to induce cytotoxic and apoptotic activities in A549/90E cells in vitro. ES in combination therapy is considered to be effective to overcome ET resistance by reducing the amount of P-gP in A549/90E cells. Full article

Background: Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte disorder in older adults that can lead to poor clinical outcomes and increased mortality. This study aims to evaluate the interrelationship between hyponatremia and geriatric syndromes and drugs in older adults. Methods: This study included 1100 elderly patients admitted to a geriatric clinic. Patient records were used to obtain demographic information, comorbidities, geriatric syndromes, medications, laboratory results, and comprehensive geriatric assessment parameters. Results: The prevalence of hyponatremia was 23.9% in this study (mean age ± SD was 75.59 ± 8.13 years). The frequency of polypharmacy, dementia, falls, malnutrition and risk of malnutrition, frailty, probable sarcopenia, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and congestive heart failure was higher, and patients were older in the hyponatremia group (p < 0.05) than in the normonatremia group. After the adjustment of covariates, hyponatremia was shown to be related to drugs including escitalopram (odds ratio [OR]: 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–2.76), trazodone (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.26–4.10), renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.18–2.47), hydrochlorothiazide (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.28–2.62), and opioids (OR: 4.46, 95% CI: 1.24–16.02) (p < 0.05). Polypharmacy, falls, and malnutrition with risk of malnutrition were still significantly associated with increased hyponatremia risk even after adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidity burden (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Hyponatremia seems to be associated with certain geriatric syndromes, as well as the use of some antidepressants and cardiovascular drugs in older adults. Malnourished older adults taking RAAS inhibitors, diuretics, opioids, and antidepressants may be at a higher risk of developing hyponatremia. They should be closely monitored, especially if they are taking multiple medications. Full article

Background: Blast traumatic brain injury (bTBI) can result in depression-like behaviors in the acute and chronic phases. SSRIs have been shown to significantly alleviate depression-like behaviors in animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) by increasing serotonin (5-HT) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the hippocampus. However, the therapeutic effects of SSRIs on depression caused by bTBI remain unclear. Objective: Therefore, this study was aimed at investigating the therapeutic effects of SSRIs on depression-like behaviors in bTBI models. Methods: We created a rat model to study mild TBI by subjecting rats to increased blast overpressures (BOP) and injecting fluoxetine and escitalopram SSRIs intraperitoneally for 28 days. Results: On day 14 post-BOP exposure, rats treated with SSRIs showed decreased depression-like behaviors. This finding was accompanied by higher 5-HT levels in the hippocampus and increased numbers of Nestin-positive cells in the dentate gyrus. Furthermore, rats treated with SSRIs exhibited increased pCREB and BDNF protein expression in the hippocampus on days 7, 14, and 28 after bTBI. Conclusions: Overall, our findings indicate that SSRI-induced recovery from depression-like behaviors after mild bTBI is associated with the upregulation of 5-HT levels, pCREB and BDNF expression, and neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Full article

Depression persists as one of the illnesses described relentlessly through the centuries because it affects a large group of people. Background/Objectives: The treatment of depression consists of various therapeutic agents, among which selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are elective. As polypharmacy tends to become the norm in modern days, the study of the real-life occurrence of drug–drug interactions is imperative. The aim of this study was the evaluation of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) between antidepressant medicines, namely SSRIs (each representative) versus eleven representatives from other antidepressant classes. Methods: Based on the spontaneous safety reports (ICSRs) uploaded to EudraVigilance until the end of July 2024, the descriptive and the disproportionality analyses were performed, and results were interpreted in the context of pharmacologic variability. Results: SSRIs were the focus of 137,369 ICSRs while for the other antidepressants, namely amitriptyline, clomipramine, duloxetine, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, bupropion, trazodone, tianeptine, agomelatine, brexpiprazole, and esketamine, a total of 155,458 reports were registered. The most notable differences appeared in psychiatric adverse drug reactions. Except fluvoxamine (n = 463), the remaining SSRIs had a higher number of DDIs reported (n = 1049 for escitalopram and n = 1549 for sertraline) compared to other antidepressants. However, similar numbers of DDIs were reported for duloxetine (n = 1252) and venlafaxine (n = 1513). Sertraline unspecified DDIs were reported with a higher probability compared to all other drugs (e.g., esketamine ROR: 9.37, 95% CI: 5.17–16.96, tianeptine ROR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.49–6.69, etc.). Conclusions: SSRIs, although known to influence various cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, have not shown higher inhibitory interactions compared to any of the drugs selected as reference. Sertraline appears in more reports concerning DDIs than the other antidepressants. Still, further real world studies related to the DDIs of SSRIs are needed to complete the relevant knowledge level. Full article

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition associated with treatment resistance, cognitive decline, structural brain changes, and an approximately 13-year reduction in life expectancy compared to the general population. Depression in BD substantially impairs quality of life, while neuroinflammation and excitotoxicity are thought to contribute to the recurrence of mood episodes and disease progression. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays a key role in neuronal growth and function, with its dysregulation being linked to various psychiatric disorders. This study is an extension of a previously published clinical trial and was conducted to assess the effects of three BDNF and BDNF-AS gene polymorphisms (rs1519480, rs6265, and rs10835210) on treatment outcomes and serum BDNF levels in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder depression (TRBDD) over an eight-week period. Methods: This study included 41 participants from a previously conducted randomized clinical trial, all of whom had available BDNF serum samples and genotype data. The participants, aged 21 to 65, were diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and treatment-resistant depression was assessed using the Maudsley Staging Method. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either escitalopram plus a placebo (ESC+PBO) or escitalopram plus celecoxib (ESC+CBX) over an 8-week period. Statistical analyses included a mixed ANOVA and chi-square tests to compare the minor allele carrier status of three SNPs with treatment response and remission rates. Results: Non-carriers of the rs6265 A allele (p = 0.005) and carriers of the rs10835210 A allele (p = 0.007) showed a significantly higher response to treatment with adjunctive celecoxib compared to escitalopram alone. Additionally, remission rates after adjunctive celecoxib were significantly higher in both carriers and non-carriers across all three SNPs compared to escitalopram alone. However, remission rates were notably higher in non-carriers of the rs1519480 G allele and rs10835210 A allele, as well as in carriers of the rs6265 A allele. Conclusions: This study suggests that genetic variations in BDNF and BDNF-AS genes significantly influence treatment response to and remission with escitalopram and celecoxib in bipolar disorder. Full article