Modern external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on lung cancer improved dose distribution thanks to advanced dose calculation algorithms, but side effects and relapses can occur in any case onset. Differential diagnosis of relapses and side effects is difficult, and when computed tomography (CT) is uncertain 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) can support the diagnosis, even if it can also be difficult to construe. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative patterns and semiquantitative parameters, both automatic and preceded by physicians, in interpreting lung lesions in the radiotherapy (RT) lung irradiation field. In total, 94 patients (pts) submitted to EBRT (3 months before) for stage II lung cancer were included (74 men, 20 women, mean age of 68 years old, range of 49–84 years old). CT scans were performed on pts, which showed lung lesions in the RT field. 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans were analyzed qualitatively as negative or positive, and the presence of the lung area with a high 18F-FDG uptake pattern was distinguished as the following: focal/wide, deep/shade, or homogeneous/inhomogeneous. Furthermore, the following semiquantitative parameters were collected: gSUVmax (global standardized uptake value max), MTV (tumor metabolic volume), metabolic spatial distribution (MSD) = proximal SUVmax/distal SUVmax, and intratumoral difference in spatial distribution (IDSD%) = [distal SUVmax/proximal SUVmax] × 100. 18F-FDG PET/CT was related to the pts’ outcome (biopsy and/or clinical–instrumental follow-up): positive for lung relapse, negative if the lesions were phlogistic. The following diagnostic performance parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT were calculated: sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), diagnostic accuracy (DA), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Qualitative variables were compared by Chi-squared test, while for semiquantitative parameters Student’s
t-test was applied;
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistics tests were performed with MedCalc V.22.018 ©2024. In 76/94 (80.8%) pts, 18F-FDG uptake was higher compared to the background; in 18/94 (19.2%) no high 18F-FDG uptake areas were detected. Outcome was positive for lung relapse in 49/94 pts, while negative in 45/94, with disease prevalence of 52.13% (95%CI = 41.57–62.54%). In the 18/94 pts without high 18F-FDG uptake, the outcome was negative for lung relapse. In 49/76 pts with higher 18F-FDG uptake, the outcome confirmed the presence of relapse, while in 27/76 the lesion was phlogistic. Results about the Sens, Spec, DA, PPV, and NPV (95%CI) were, respectively: 100% (92.75–100%), 40% (25.7–55.67%), 71.28% (61.02–80.14%), 64.47% (58.84–69.73%), and 100% (81.47–100%). Chi-square test showed significant statistical difference between the positive and negative outcome for patterns focal/wide (
p = 0.02) and deep/shade (
p < 0.00001). A total of 35/49 (71.4%) pts with lung relapse had a focal lesion and 15/27 (55.6%) with phlogosis had a wide pattern. A total of 34/49 (69.4%) pts with lung relapse had a deep pattern and 25/27 (92.6%) with lung phlogosis had the shade one. Significant difference was observed in evaluating the three patterns (
p = 0.00007), with prevalence of “focal/deep/homogeneous” patterns in lung relapse and “wide/shade/inhomogeneous” in phlogosis. gSUVmax, MTV, MSD, and IDSD% were in the following order: in the 76 pts, 5.63 (1.4–24.7), 42.49 (4.94–193), 3.61 (1–5.54), and 70.7% (18–100%); in the 49/76 true positive pts, 6.93 (1.5–24.7), 35.28 (4.94–85.99), 3.30 (1.05–5.54), and (18–95%); in the 27/76 false positive pts, 3.27 (1.4–19.2), 38.37 (4.94–193), 1.57 (1–2.13), and 78.6% (4.7–100%). The difference was statistically significant only for MSD (t = 2.779;
p = 0.0069) and IDSD% (t = 2.769;
p = 0.0071). 18F-FDG-PET/CT confirms its high sensitivity and NPV in evaluating lung lesions after RT. To improve physician confidence in interpreting lung 18F-FDG uptake without further support, MSD and IDSD% could be considered. Heterogeneity of lung lesions, especially in radiotreated tissue, can be turned from a drawback to a resource and analyzed for differentiating relapses from EBRT side effects. Considering the calculation of semiquantitative parameters that require “human intelligence”, even if slightly more time-consuming, can improve the nuclear physician’s confidence in interpreting 18F-FDG PET/CT images.
Full article