Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = liver-related contraindications

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1472 KB  
Article
A Comparative Study of Radiofrequency Ablation, Microwave Ablation, and Percutaneous Ethanol Injection in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma—A Single-Center Experience
by Mohamed Abdel-Samiee, Reham Reda Elkazaz, Hazem Omar, Nada Mohsen Salama, Asmaa Ibrahim Gomaa, Mohamed Akl Rady and Imam Waked
Diagnostics 2025, 15(23), 3027; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233027 - 27 Nov 2025
Viewed by 87
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the third most prevalent cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. This study sought to evaluate microwave ablation (MWA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI)—whether used separately or together (RFA+PEI, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the third most prevalent cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. This study sought to evaluate microwave ablation (MWA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI)—whether used separately or together (RFA+PEI, MWA+PEI)—for treating single HCC lesions ≤5 cm, focusing on outcomes, survival rates, complications, costs, and recurrence rates. Methods: This retrospective–prospective research study involved 250 patients with solitary HCC lesions measuring ≤5 cm, recruited from the National Liver Institute at Menoufia University. Patients were evenly divided into five groups, each containing (n = 50): RFA, MWA, PEI, combined RFA+PEI, and combined MWA+PEI. Indications and contraindications adhered to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines. Results: Three patients were administered antiviral therapy 1–2 years after ablation. Average intervention costs were 17,340 ± 700, 31,200 ± 900, 1140 ± 300, 17,500 ± 0.0, and 33,800 ± 0.0 EGP for groups 1 through 5, respectively. Short-term advancement rates were 12%, 8%, 18%, 4%, and 2%. After 36 months, all patients survived six months after ablation. Average survival durations were 2.44 ± 1.17, 2.59 ± 1.02, 2.69 ± 0.99, 2.83 ± 1.06,and 2.91 ± 1.04 years, respectively. Complications were mainly minor (pain, nausea, and low-grade fever); one patient experienced an abscess and biloma post-MWA, one experienced minimal pleural effusion, and two combined-therapy cases had abdominal wall hematoma. Conclusions: RFA, MWA, and PEI—whether used individually or together—are successful treatment choices for early-stage HCC. The combination of MWA and PEI demonstrated the most favorable results, minimal recurrence rates, and the longest duration of progression-free survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 234 KB  
Review
Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Scoping Review on Redefining Boundaries in Transplant Oncology
by Berkay Demirors, Vrishketan Sethi, Abiha Abdullah, Charbel Elias, Francis Spitz, Jason Mial-Anthony, Godwin Packiaraj, Sabin Subedi, Shwe Han, Timothy Fokken and Michele Molinari
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(9), 481; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090481 - 28 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1753
Abstract
Historically, colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) have been considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), primarily due to limited organ availability and concerns about oncologic efficacy. However, emerging evidence indicates that highly selected patients with unresectable CRLM can achieve long-term survival following LT—often with [...] Read more.
Historically, colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) have been considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), primarily due to limited organ availability and concerns about oncologic efficacy. However, emerging evidence indicates that highly selected patients with unresectable CRLM can achieve long-term survival following LT—often with outcomes superior to those obtained through conventional systemic therapies. To evaluate the evolving role of LT in this setting, we conducted a scoping review of the literature. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as ProQuest Dissertations & Theses and Google Scholar to capture gray literature. The search included English-language articles published between January 2015 and April 2025. Eligible studies included those reporting on the application of LT for patients with unresectable CRLM. This scoping review synthesizes current evidence on patient selection criteria, overall and disease-free survival, recurrence patterns, and emerging biomarkers that may guide transplant eligibility. In addition, we explore innovations in organ utilization—including living donor LT and machine perfusion technologies—that aim to expand access while addressing ethical concerns related to organ allocation. As LT for CRLM transitions from investigational use to clinical implementation, this review outlines the key challenges and future opportunities that will shape its role in the landscape of transplant oncology. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 628 KB  
Review
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Evolving Role of Systemic Therapies as a Bridging Treatment to Liver Transplantation
by Yacob Saleh, Taher Abu Hejleh, Maen Abdelrahim, Ali Shamseddine, Laudy Chehade, Tala Alawabdeh, Issa Mohamad, Mohammad Sammour and Rim Turfa
Cancers 2024, 16(11), 2081; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112081 - 30 May 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3011
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond [...] Read more.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond the Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a systemic bridging therapy to LT in patients with contraindications for locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection after liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICI treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Transplant Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 4404 KB  
Case Report
Successful Multidisciplinary Treatment with Laparoscopic Hepatectomy and Adjuvant Therapy for Metachronous Solitary Hepatic Metastasis after Excision of a Primary Anorectal Malignant Melanoma: A Case Report
by Ryotaro Shimazaki, Masahiro Hagiwara, Chikayoshi Tani, Hiroyoshi Iwata, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Marika Fukuyama, Taisuke Matsuya, Koji Imai, Sayaka Yuzawa, Mishie Tanino and Hideki Yokoo
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(1), 203-210; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31010013 - 29 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1946
Abstract
Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is extremely rare and generally lethal, irrespective of the treatment administered. The disease is often diagnosed late, metastases being present in approximately two-thirds of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Solitary metastasis of ARMM to a distant organ [...] Read more.
Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is extremely rare and generally lethal, irrespective of the treatment administered. The disease is often diagnosed late, metastases being present in approximately two-thirds of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Solitary metastasis of ARMM to a distant organ is exceedingly rare. A 76-year-old woman with a history of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of an ARMM 13 months previously, was found to have a solitary liver metastasis in the follow-up computed tomography. A preoperative work-up showed no other distant metastases nor contraindication to surgery. It was therefore considered that resection was indicated. The metachronous solitary liver metastasis from an ARMM was treated by laparoscopic wedge hepatectomy of the eighth segment 18 months after excision of her primary ARMM. Adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab was initiated and continued at 6-week intervals. The patient has not exhibited any immune related Adverse Effects (irAE) during or subsequent to treatment with pembrolizmab and has now completed 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy, having survived 33 months from the initial operation for primary ARMM, and remaining recurrence-free 14 months after hepatectomy. ARMM is extremely rare and resection of a metachronous solitary metastasis followed by adjuvant therapy has not previously been reported. We hope this case will be useful for clinicians who might treat similar patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgical Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 478 KB  
Review
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure: Current Interventional Treatment Options and Future Challenges
by Markus Kimmann and Jonel Trebicka
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(7), 1052; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071052 - 26 Jun 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4167
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a frequent complication in patients with liver cirrhosis that has high short-term mortality. It is characterized by acute decompensation (AD) of liver cirrhosis, intra- and extrahepatic organ failure, and severe systemic inflammation (SI). In the recent past, several [...] Read more.
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a frequent complication in patients with liver cirrhosis that has high short-term mortality. It is characterized by acute decompensation (AD) of liver cirrhosis, intra- and extrahepatic organ failure, and severe systemic inflammation (SI). In the recent past, several studies have investigated the management of this group of patients. Identification and treatment of precipitants of decompensation and ACLF play an important role, and management of the respective intra- and extrahepatic organ failures is essential. However, no specific treatment for ACLF has been established to date, and the only curative treatment option currently available for these patients is liver transplantation (LT). It has been shown that ACLF patients are at severe risk of waitlist mortality, and post-LT survival rates are high, making ACLF patients suitable candidates for LT. However, only a limited number of patients are eligible for LT due to related contraindications such as uncontrolled infections. In this case, bridging strategies (e.g., extracorporeal organ support systems) are required. Further therapeutic approaches have recently been developed and evaluated. Thus, this review focuses on current management and potential future treatment options. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Challenges and Therapeutic Options for Liver Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2039 KB  
Article
Inconsistencies and Ambiguities in Liver-Disease-Related Contraindications—A Systematic Analysis of SmPCs/PI of Major Drug Markets
by Laura Weisbach, Anna K. Schuster, Michael Hartmann, Martin F. Fromm, Renke Maas and Katrin Farker
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(7), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071933 - 30 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3094
Abstract
Liver disease is a common condition worldwide that can cause alterations in drug disposition and susceptibility to drug toxicities, with increased risk of adverse drug reactions. European Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) and United States Prescribing Information (US PI) should therefore be comprehensible [...] Read more.
Liver disease is a common condition worldwide that can cause alterations in drug disposition and susceptibility to drug toxicities, with increased risk of adverse drug reactions. European Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) and United States Prescribing Information (US PI) should therefore be comprehensible to prescribers regarding their liver-associated contraindications to ensure safe prescribing. This study aimed to evaluate the ambiguity of terminology used in communicating liver-associated absolute contraindications in SmPCs/PI of commonly prescribed drugs in four major drug markets (Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States) by assigning wordings to different categories and analyzing their clinical comprehensibility. For US PI, 79% did not contain liver-related contraindications, compared to 2, 13, and 6% of German, Swiss, and British SmPCs, respectively. Study findings indicate that out of 228 examined SmPCs/PI containing liver-related contraindications, 77, 79, 76, and 52% contained unclear wording in the German, Swiss, British, and American drug market, respectively. Only 40% (German), 52% (Swiss), 39% (British), and 29% (American) of SmPCs/PI included terms with explicit wording. Including more precise statements in SmPCs/PI based on laboratory parameters (such as albumin) or scores (e.g., the Child–Pugh score) to objectify the severity of liver disease may improve the clarity of SmPCs/PI and the safety of drug prescription. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 794 KB  
Review
Muscle Ultrasonographic Elastography in Children: Review of the Current Knowledge and Application
by Agnieszka Cebula, Maciej Cebula and Ilona Kopyta
Children 2021, 8(11), 1042; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8111042 - 12 Nov 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3211
Abstract
Ultrasonographic elastography is a relatively new imaging modality for the qualitative and quantitative assessments of tissue elasticity. While it has steadily gained use in adult clinical practice, including for liver diseases, breast cancer, thyroid pathologies, and muscle and tendon diseases, data on its [...] Read more.
Ultrasonographic elastography is a relatively new imaging modality for the qualitative and quantitative assessments of tissue elasticity. While it has steadily gained use in adult clinical practice, including for liver diseases, breast cancer, thyroid pathologies, and muscle and tendon diseases, data on its paediatric application is still limited. Moreover, diagnosis of muscular diseases in children remains challenging. The gold standard methods, namely biopsy, electroneurography, and electromyography, are often limited owing to their invasive characteristics, possible contraindications, complications, and need for good cooperation, that is, a patient’s ability to perform certain tasks during the examination while withstanding discomfort, which is a significant problem especially in younger or uncooperative children. Genetic testing, which has broad diagnostic possibilities, often entails a high cost, which limits its application. Thus, a non-invasive, objective, repeatable, and accessible tool is needed to aid in both the diagnosis and monitoring of muscle pathologies. We believe that elastography may prove to be such a method. The aim of this review was to present the current knowledge on the use of muscle elastography in the paediatric population and information on the limitations of elastography in relation to examination protocols and factors for consideration in everyday practice and future studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuromuscular Disorders in Children and Adolescents)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 690 KB  
Review
Paracetamol: A Review of Guideline Recommendations
by Ulderico Freo, Chiara Ruocco, Alessandra Valerio, Irene Scagnol and Enzo Nisoli
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(15), 3420; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153420 - 31 Jul 2021
Cited by 133 | Viewed by 47015
Abstract
Musculoskeletal pain conditions are age-related, leading contributors to chronic pain and pain-related disability, which are expected to rise with the rapid global population aging. Current medical treatments provide only partial relief. Furthermore, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are effective in young and [...] Read more.
Musculoskeletal pain conditions are age-related, leading contributors to chronic pain and pain-related disability, which are expected to rise with the rapid global population aging. Current medical treatments provide only partial relief. Furthermore, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are effective in young and otherwise healthy individuals but are often contraindicated in elderly and frail patients. As a result of its favorable safety and tolerability record, paracetamol has long been the most common drug for treating pain. Strikingly, recent reports questioned its therapeutic value and safety. This review aims to present guideline recommendations. Paracetamol has been assessed in different conditions and demonstrated therapeutic efficacy on both acute and chronic pain. It is active as a single agent and is additive or synergistic with NSAIDs and opioids, improving their efficacy and safety. However, a lack of significant efficacy and hepatic toxicity have also been reported. Fast dissolving formulations of paracetamol provide superior and more extended pain relief that is similar to intravenous paracetamol. A dose reduction is recommended in patients with liver disease or malnourished. Genotyping may improve efficacy and safety. Within the current trend toward the minimization of opioid analgesia, it is consistently included in multimodal, non-opioid, or opioid-sparing therapies. Paracetamol is being recommended by guidelines as a first or second-line drug for acute pain and chronic pain, especially for patients with limited therapeutic options and for the elderly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacological Management of Chronic Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 374 KB  
Communication
Real World Outcomes and Hepatotoxicity of Infliximab in the Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Immune-Related Adverse Events
by Daniel V. Araujo, Thiago Pimentel Muniz, Anjie Yang, Sareh Keshavarzi, Hadas Sorotsky, Marcus O. Butler, Samuel Saibil, Anna Spreafico and David Hogg
Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28(3), 2173-2179; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28030201 - 11 Jun 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4040
Abstract
Background and aims: Current guidelines state that infliximab is contraindicated for the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis) due to the risk of inducing further liver damage. As this recommendation is largely based on the use of infliximab for rheumatologic diseases, we [...] Read more.
Background and aims: Current guidelines state that infliximab is contraindicated for the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis) due to the risk of inducing further liver damage. As this recommendation is largely based on the use of infliximab for rheumatologic diseases, we evaluated the efficacy and hepatotoxicity of infliximab in patients with steroid-refractory immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients treated with infliximab for irAEs at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. To assess hepatotoxicity, we compared the mean value of ALT, AST, and total bilirubin (BT) before and after infliximab treatment. We used logistic regression to assess factors associated with infliximab efficacy. Results: Between January 2010 and February 2019, 56 patients were identified. The median age of the patients was 63 (27–84) years. Colitis was the most frequent toxicity (66%), followed by pneumonitis (11%). Infliximab was used to treat ir-hepatitis in one patient. The median number of infliximab doses was 1 (1–3) and led to toxicity resolution in 43 (76%) patients. The mean ALT, AST, and BT levels before and after infliximab treatment were not statistically different. The patient treated for ir-hepatitis had a complete recovery, with no incremental liver toxicity. Conclusions: In this dose-limited setting, infliximab was effective in resolving irAEs and did not induce hepatotoxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 840 KB  
Article
Medication-Related Problems in Older People with Multimorbidity in Catalonia: A Real-World Data Study with 5 Years’ Follow-Up
by Amelia Troncoso-Mariño, Albert Roso-Llorach, Tomás López-Jiménez, Noemí Villen, Ester Amado-Guirado, Sergio Fernández-Bertolin, Lucía A. Carrasco-Ribelles, Josep Ma Borras and Concepción Violán
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(4), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040709 - 11 Feb 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3774
Abstract
Aging, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy are associated with medication-related problems (MRPs). This study aimed to assess the association that multimorbidity and mortality have with MRPs in older people over time. We followed multimorbid, older (65–99 years) people in Catalonia from 2012 to 2016, using [...] Read more.
Aging, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy are associated with medication-related problems (MRPs). This study aimed to assess the association that multimorbidity and mortality have with MRPs in older people over time. We followed multimorbid, older (65–99 years) people in Catalonia from 2012 to 2016, using longitudinal data and Cox models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). We reviewed electronic health records to collect explanatory variables and MRPs (duplicate therapy, drug–drug interactions, potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), and contraindicated drugs in chronic kidney disease (CKD) or liver disease). There were 723,016 people (median age: 74 years; 58.9% women) who completed follow-up. We observed a significant (p < 0.001) increase in the proportion with at least one MRP (2012: 66.9% to 2016: 75.5%); contraindicated drugs in CKD (11.1 to 18.5%) and liver disease (3.9 to 5.3%); and PIMs (62.5 to 71.1%), especially drugs increasing fall risk (67.5%). People with ≥10 diseases had more MRPs (in 2016: PIMs, 89.6%; contraindicated drugs in CKD, 34.4%; and in liver disease, 9.3%). All MRPs were independently associated with mortality, from duplicate therapy (HR 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.08) to interactions (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.54–1.66). Ensuring safe pharmacological treatment in elderly, multimorbid patient remains a challenge for healthcare systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimorbidity Development and Evolution: Clinical Implications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop