Search Results (128)

Historically, colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) have been considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), primarily due to limited organ availability and concerns about oncologic efficacy. However, emerging evidence indicates that highly selected patients with unresectable CRLM can achieve long-term survival following LT—often with outcomes superior to those obtained through conventional systemic therapies. To evaluate the evolving role of LT in this setting, we conducted a scoping review of the literature. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as ProQuest Dissertations & Theses and Google Scholar to capture gray literature. The search included English-language articles published between January 2015 and April 2025. Eligible studies included those reporting on the application of LT for patients with unresectable CRLM. This scoping review synthesizes current evidence on patient selection criteria, overall and disease-free survival, recurrence patterns, and emerging biomarkers that may guide transplant eligibility. In addition, we explore innovations in organ utilization—including living donor LT and machine perfusion technologies—that aim to expand access while addressing ethical concerns related to organ allocation. As LT for CRLM transitions from investigational use to clinical implementation, this review outlines the key challenges and future opportunities that will shape its role in the landscape of transplant oncology. Full article

Background and Objectives: Postoperative physical recovery, particularly the acquisition of independent ambulation, is a critical milestone in rehabilitation following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Although liver function markers are conventionally used to assess hepatic physiology, emerging evidence has suggested their potential role as prognostic indicators of physical performance. Materials and Methods: This study investigated the association between liver function parameters at the initiation of postoperative physical therapy (total bilirubin [T-Bil], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) and the independent walking ability of 63 patients who underwent LDLT. A logistic regression model was constructed using these variables, and a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate its discriminative performance. Predicted probabilities of each patient were calculated, and the optimal cutoff value was determined based on the Youden Index. Results: The multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated a statistically significant association between liver function markers and the ambulation status of a cohort of 63 patients. The ROC curve analysis yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.8416 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.715–0.968), indicating strong predictive performance. The optimal cutoff value was 0.865, with sensitivity and specificity of 74.1% and 88.9%, respectively. The bootstrap CI for sensitivity at this threshold ranged from 0.6111 to 0.8519. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test indicated good model fit (p = 0.363), and the correct classification rate was 87.3%. Conclusions: Liver function test results may be indicators of hepatic dysfunction as well as functional biomarkers that could predict ambulatory outcomes following LDLT. This predictive model may enhance early clinical decision-making regarding rehabilitation and discharge planning. Future prospective studies should be performed to validate the generalizability of these results to broader clinical contexts. Full article

Background/Objectives: Preoperative sarcopenia in liver transplantation (LT) recipients is an important prognostic factor of LT outcomes. Systemic inflammatory status (SIS) has been proposed as a unifying mechanism for skeletal muscle loss; thus, considering SIS and sarcopenia together may enhance prognosis assessment in patients undergoing LT. Herein, we aimed to describe the relationship between the SIS and skeletal muscle index (SMI) with short-term and long-term mortality post-living donor LT (LDLT). Methods: In total, 3387 consecutive adult LDLT recipients were retrospectively evaluated. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, using a cut-off of 3) was utilized as an SIS. SMI was calculated using computed tomography scans, measured at the third lumbar vertebra; sex-specific cut-offs were determined from contemporary donors. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. Results: Decreasing SMI was associated with increasing NLR. Increasing NLR and decreasing SMI both showed dose-dependent relationships with a risk of 90-day mortality. Within sarcopenic patients, NLR > 3 (vs. NLR ≤ 3) was associated with higher 90-day (9.3% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.049) and overall mortality (28.4% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.045). Sarcopenia and NLR > 3 (vs. neither) were independent predictors of 90-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.48 [1.40–4.40], p = 0.002) and overall mortality (HR, 1.81 [1.37–2.38], p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. When stratified by age, sex, and MELD score, the association between sarcopenia and overall mortality persisted in all subgroups, with the highest risk observed in women (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.83–6.43). Conclusions: Sarcopenia, with the systemic inflammatory response, nearly doubled the risk of 90-day and overall mortality post-LT, proposing that these readily available biomarkers are a practical index for predicting survival post-LT. Considering that these are potentially modifiable factors, our result may provide a new therapeutic target to improve survival post-LT. Full article

Background: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) poses significant physiological challenges, especially during early postoperative recovery. While the long-term benefits of structured rehabilitation are well documented, data on short-term effects—particularly during the critical early inpatient phase—remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of a structured exercise program on cardiopulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, physical performance, oxidative stress markers, and quality of life in LDLT recipients. Methods: Four LDLT recipients (2 males, 2 females; mean age 48.00 ± 18.35 years) underwent a 4-week inpatient rehabilitation protocol. Weeks 1–2 involved conventional care, while weeks 3–4 included structured exercise consisting of early mobilization and inspiratory muscle training. Outcome measures included cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), spirometry, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax, PEmax), 6 min walk distance (6MWD), lower limb muscle strength, Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), and serum oxidative stress markers (total antioxidant capacity [TAC] and malondialdehyde [MDA]). Results: All patients demonstrated postoperative declines in VO₂ peak, PImax, PEmax, and TAC. Structured exercise yielded clinically meaningful improvements in respiratory muscle strength, notably in female and younger participants. Two younger patients showed increased 6MWD; however, no patient regained preoperative VO₂ peak. TAC levels decreased following the intervention, and MDA levels remained stable in most cases. Conclusions: A two-week structured exercise program during early postoperative recovery may provide partial benefits in respiratory muscle strength and physical performance but is insufficient to restore full cardiopulmonary function in LDLT recipients. Longer rehabilitation periods may be necessary to achieve preoperative recovery levels. Full article

Background Sex disparity has been highlighted in personalized medicine for various human diseases including acute/chronic liver diseases. In the transplant community, greater graft failure risk in female-to-male liver transplantation (LT) has been repeatedly reported, and a recent study in living donor LT reported that the inferiority of female-to-male LT is shown only when donor age is ≤40 y. We aimed to analyze the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to test if the poorer outcome of female-to-male LT changes by donor age of 40 y in deceased donor LT, as shown in living donor LT. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 11,752 adult patients in the UNOS registry who underwent deceased donor LT between 2000–2023 were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was performed to adjust the effects from transplant years, graft ischemia time, disease severity, and others. The primary outcome was graft failure. Results Within the subgroup of recipients with ≤40 y donors, graft failure risk was significantly greater in female-to-male LT than others (vs. female-to-female, HR = 1.43 [1.16–1.76], p < 0.001; vs. male-to-female, HR = 1.46 [1.18–1.81], p < 0.001; vs. male-to-male, HR = 1.26 [1.16–1.49], p = 0.009). In contrast, within the subgroup of recipients with >40 y donors, the risk was comparable between female-to-male LT and other donor-recipient sex groups (vs. female-to-female, p = 0.907; vs. male-to-female, p = 0.781; vs. male-to-male, p = 0.937). We tested various cutoff donor ages and determined that 40 y is the best cutoff value to define the risk subgroup in female-to-male LT. Conclusions In the current study, we found that the sex disparity shown in living donor LT is also observed in deceased donor LT. That is, post-transplant graft failure risk was greater in female-to-male LT than other donor–recipient sex groups only when donor age was ≤40 y. In contrast, graft failure risk was comparable irrespective of donor-recipient sex combinations when donor age was >40 y. Full article

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatic malignancies is becoming increasingly common, largely because it offers superior survival relative to other treatment approaches. LT is well-accepted for primary liver cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and is being increasingly accepted for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and metastases of colorectal cancer or neuroendocrine tumors to the liver. Over time, indications for transplant oncology have broadened, as has the acceptable disease burden for transplantation, particularly with the advent of new neoadjuvant therapies. Other current frontiers in the field include expanding the donor pool through living donors, extended criteria donors, machine perfusion and increasing access to LT for people from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds. Expanding access to LT can offer renewed hope for long-term survival to patients with primary and secondary liver cancer. Full article

Background and Objectives: Glucose instability has been established to be related to postoperative morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation. To date, the impact of maintaining optimal blood glucose (BG) levels on the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) following liver transplantation (LT) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the impact of optimal BG level after reperfusion (REP BG) on the incidence of AKI after living donor LT (LDLT). Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 3331 patients who underwent LDLT between January 2008 and December 2019. Patients were divided into optimal (110 mg/dL < BG < 180 mg/dL) and non-optimal (BG < 110 mg/dL or >180 mg/dL) REP BG groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with AKI. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the incidence of AKI, AKI severity, and progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) between the groups. Results: The incidence of AKI was 66.7%. After PSM, patients in the optimal REP BG group showed a lower incidence of AKI (66.5% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.032). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the non-optimal REP BG group was independently associated with a higher risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.45; p = 0.037) compared to the optimal group. Similarly, the risks of severe AKI (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11–1.58; p = 0.002) and progression to CKD (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01–1.41; p = 0.039) were significantly higher in the non-optimal group after PSM. Conclusions: Maintenance of an optimal REP BG was associated with a significantly lower incidence of AKI and a reduced risk of progression to CKD within 1 year after LDLT. Full article

Background: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) after liver transplantation (LT) remain a concern. No universal protocol for antifungal prophylaxis in LT exists. Antifungal prophylaxis varies across European centers. Studies suggest risk stratification for prophylaxis. This study assessed IFI frequency and outcomes in adult LT recipients without antifungal prophylaxis and evaluated risk stratification for predicting IFIs. Method: A retrospective analysis of clinical and microbiological data from 244 liver transplant patients focused on IFI within 100 days post-transplantation. Of these, 225 (92%) had right liver transplants from living donors. We assessed two risk stratification models for predicting IFI: one categorizes patients into low- and high-risk groups, and the other divides patients into three categories, with two eligible for prophylaxis and one not. Results: Of 244 patients, 3% (seven individuals) developed invasive fungal infections (IFI), including two aspergillosis and five candidiasis. IFI occurred in 8% of high-risk and 2% of low-risk patients in the first stratification, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.144). In the second stratification, IFI was found in 4% of the target and 2% of non-target groups, without a significant difference (p = 0.455). Patients with IFI showed higher mean MELD scores of 21.71 ± 2.35 versus 17.04 ± 6.48 in those without IFI (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study evaluated IFI outcomes without systemic antifungal prophylaxis in LT recipients. Limited antifungal use in a major living liver donor transplantation (LDLT) group, with low MELD scores and immunosuppression protocols, could be feasible. Future multicenter studies can improve understanding and develop prophylaxis algorithms for LT settings. Full article

Background: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become a widely accepted alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Nevertheless, the available meta-analyses shed light on a perplexing issue regarding which transplant is better. Therefore, we performed an umbrella review to summarize and evaluate the evidence from current meta-analyses. Methods: Two independent reviewers conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to 1 June 2024. The methodological quality of each included meta-analysis was evaluated using AMSTAR2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews). Results: The search identified 10 meta-analyses from 486 individual articles, including cohort studies and observational studies. Regrettably, the quality of these meta-analyses ranged from critically low to moderate. Receipt of LDLT offers a survival advantage to the patients with HCC compared with DDLT but with a higher complication rate. However, high-quality studies are required in the future to validate our assertions owing to the low certainty of the evidence. Conclusions: Despite the complication risks, LDLT remains a cost-effective option without compromising patient and graft survival, especially for HCC patients. Extensive, well-designed studies are essential to validate these conclusions. Full article

Background/Objectives: MVI is a relevant prognostic factor among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving liver transplantation (LT). The preoperative assessment of the risk for MVI is relevant to pre-LT patient management and selection. The objective of this study was to create and validate a model to predict microvascular invasion (MVI) based on preoperative variables in the LT setting. Methods: A total of 2170 patients from 11 collaborative centers in Europe, Asia, and the US, who received transplants between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017, were enrolled in the study. The entire cohort was split into a training and a validation set (70/30% of the initial cohort, respectively) using random selection. Results: MVI was reported in 586 (27.0%) explanted specimens. Using the training set data, multivariable logistic regression identified three preoperative parameters associated with MVI: α-fetoprotein (lnAFP; odds ratio [OR] = 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13–1.27), imaging tumor burden score (lnTBS; OR = 1.66; 95%CI = 1.39–1.99), and a fast-track approach before LT due to the availability of a live donation (OR = 1.99; 95%CI = 1.56–2.53). In the validation set, the LT-MVI c-index was 0.74, versus 0.69 for the MVI score proposed by Endo et al. (Brier Skill Score +75%). The new score had a relevant net reclassification index (overall value = 0.61). Stratifying the validation set into three risk categories (0–50th, 51st–75th, and >75th score percentiles), a very good stratification was observed in terms of disease-free (5-year: 89.3, 75.5, and 50.7%, respectively) and overall survival (5-year: 79.5, 72.6, and 53.7%, respectively). Conclusions: The preoperative assessment of MVI using the proposed score demonstrated very good accuracy in predicting MVI after LT. Full article

In patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with immediate postoperative extubation in the operating room (OR), rapid recovery of consciousness and spontaneous ventilation are essential, requiring effective analgesia without compromising respiratory function. This study evaluated whether intraoperative nefopam administration improves early postoperative pain control and reduces opioid consumption in this physiologically distinct population. A retrospective cohort of 376 adult LDLT recipients who met the criteria for OR extubation was analyzed. After propensity score matching, 182 patients who received intraoperative nefopam were compared with 182 matched controls. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and total fentanyl consumption and opioid-related complications were recorded over the first 24 h postoperatively. Nefopam administration was associated with significantly lower VAS scores during the first 12 h after surgery (p < 0.001) and reduced 24 h fentanyl consumption (53.2 ± 20.8 mL vs. 58.6 ± 27.5 mL, p = 0.035). No serious adverse effects related to nefopam were observed. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the groups. These findings indicate that nefopam offers effective early analgesia and an opioid-sparing effect in LDLT recipients undergoing OR extubation, suggesting its clinical utility as a component of multimodal analgesia in this high-risk group. Although the reduction in opioid use did not translate into a decreased incidence of opioid-related complications, the favorable safety profile and analgesic efficacy of nefopam support further investigation through prospective trials to define its role in enhanced recovery protocols for OR-extubated LDLT recipients. Full article

Laparoscopic surgery reduces tissue trauma and accelerates recovery, but postoperative pain remains a concern. Opioids are effective but have adverse effects, highlighting the need for multimodal analgesia. Nefopam, a non-opioid analgesic, provides pain relief without respiratory depression or dependence. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of intravenous nefopam combined with a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in living liver donors undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy. This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 452 adult living donors who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy with a TAP block between August 2013 and August 2018 at a single tertiary medical center. After propensity score matching, 296 patients were included, with 148 in the nefopam group and 148 in the non-nefopam group. The primary outcomes assessed were pain scores using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and nefopam-related adverse effects. Nefopam significantly reduced NRS at 1, 4, and 8 h postoperatively (p < 0.001) and decreased fentanyl use in the post-anesthesia care unit (26.0 ± 32.2 μg vs. 60.5 ± 37.9 μg, p < 0.001) and total intravenous patient-controlled analgesia volume (p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and severe opioid-related complications did not differ between groups. Nefopam-related side effects were mild and self-limiting. Nefopam combined with a TAP block effectively reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption in living liver donors, supporting its role in multimodal analgesia. Further research is needed to explore its broader applications. Full article

Background/Objectives: Ischemic time plays a crucial role in graft function and survival during kidney transplantation. Cooling methods, including cold perfusion and ice slush, are predominantly applied to preserve the kidney, but they may cause uneven cooling and complications. The Organ Pocket^®, an insulated gel bag, has been introduced as an alternative cooling method. However, no studies have compared renal temperature changes between the Organ Pocket^® and conventional cooling methods. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 49 cases of living-donor kidney transplantation. Among these, 33 received kidney grafts preserved with the Organ Pocket^® (OP group), and 16 underwent conventional cooling (control group). Renal surface temperatures were recorded at 5 min intervals during vascular anastomosis using thermography. Postoperative renal function was assessed with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine (sCr), and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) levels. Results: The OP group demonstrated significantly higher renal surface temperatures than the control group during vascular anastomosis (p < 0.05). Renal surface temperature before reperfusion was 20.4 °C ± 2.5 °C and 17.2 °C ± 2.5 °C in the OP and control groups, respectively. No significant differences in postoperative eGFR, sCr, and L-FABP levels; delayed graft function (DGF); or acute rejection rates were observed between the groups. Conclusions: The Organ Pocket^® effectively stabilized renal temperatures during vascular anastomosis without direct cooling, thereby reducing continuous manual cooling requirements. Short-term renal function outcomes were comparable between groups; however, the Organ Pocket^® may improve surgical efficiency and be particularly beneficial in robot-assisted kidney transplantation. Further studies are warranted to investigate its long-term benefits. Full article

Living donor transplantation constitutes a small portion of total transplants in the United States as compared Southeast Asia and Middle East. Recent consensus meeting has identified reluctance on the part of transplant providers and donor financial concerns as the major hindrance in increasing the Living donor liver transplants in US. There is a need to carefully analyze the recent outcome data from across the globe and from large volume North American centers that clearly establishes the benefit of Living donor transplants for both adults and children and reducing wait list mortality. LDLT also provides an opportunity for expanding the indications to offer transplant for indications like colorectal metastasis and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without reducing the number of livers available for traditional indications. Recent expansion of perfusion technology has demonstrated significant increase in utilization of Non heart beating donor livers over the last few years. However, with simultaneous increase in patients being added to the wait list, the wait list mortality and dropouts have been persistently high. In this opinion piece, the authors have looked at the transplant trends in the US in the last few years and advocate for adopting a complementary rather than a singular approach for expansion of LDLT along with new perfusion technologies for increasing the number of liver transplants in the US. Full article

Purpose: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) serves as a solution for patients facing end-stage liver disease. The existing literature indicates that sex differences between transplant donors and recipients might influence survival rates. Methods: We used a retrospective study design to investigate the impact of different sex pairings on the survival rates of adult LDLT recipients. This study involved the long-term tracking of recipients who underwent LDLT between 7 June 2000 and 31 December 2021. Results: In total, 169 pairs (37.1%) of male recipients with male donors, 145 pairs (31.8%) of male recipients with female donors, 77 pairs (16.9%) of female recipients with female donors, and 65 pairs (14.3%) of female recipients with male donors were submitted for analysis. With independent t-tests or chi-squared tests demonstrating that liver weight and graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for same-sex LDLT recipients were significantly higher than opposite-sex recipients; significant differences in disease diagnoses between same-sex and opposite-sex LDLT recipients were found. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve indicates that while same-sex pair survival rates were higher than opposite-sex pairs, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: While sex matching might have some impact on survival rates, it is influenced by a variety of factors, so the effects of donor and recipient sex matching on liver transplantation remains controversial. The findings of this study can serve as a reference for living-donor liver transplant teams when making donor selection decisions. Full article