Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (12)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = meniscal root repair

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 2225 KB  
Article
Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes of Pullout Repair Combined with Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears with Focal Cartilage Defects: A Treatment-Stratified Cohort Study
by Naoki Akura, Koki Kawada, Yuki Okazaki, Keisuke Kintaka, Yuya Kodama, Toshiki Kohara and Takayuki Furumatsu
Bioengineering 2026, 13(3), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13030343 - 16 Mar 2026
Viewed by 451
Abstract
Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) with focal cartilage defects present a therapeutic challenge, even in neutral-to-mild varus knees. Although transtibial pullout repair is standard for MMPRTs without advanced osteoarthritis, coexisting cartilage lesions may compromise outcomes and prompt unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Combining [...] Read more.
Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) with focal cartilage defects present a therapeutic challenge, even in neutral-to-mild varus knees. Although transtibial pullout repair is standard for MMPRTs without advanced osteoarthritis, coexisting cartilage lesions may compromise outcomes and prompt unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Combining pullout repair with osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) may offer a joint-preserving alternative by restoring meniscal hoop stress and reconstructing focal osteochondral defects. However, supporting evidence is limited. We retrospectively analyzed 150 patients treated surgically for MMPRT between 2015 and 2019, divided into three groups: pullout repair with OAT (Group O, n = 6), pullout repair alone (Group P, n = 120), and UKA (Group U, n = 24), with OAT being applied only in carefully selected patients based on strict clinical and radiographic indications. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively, at 1 year, and at final follow-up (mean, 4.2–5.8 years). The primary outcome was the final clinical score, and secondary outcomes were changes from baseline. All groups improved postoperatively. Group O showed marked improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score—Symptom and Visual Analogue Scale—Pain score, achieving outcomes comparable to Group U at final follow-up. Group P showed consistent improvement from baseline. Radiographically, mild osteoarthritis progression was observed in Group O. Given the small sample size in Group O and the retrospective design, the findings are exploratory and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5290 KB  
Article
Time-Dependent Anchor Hole Expansion May Associate with Meniscal Extrusion After Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Combined with Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Repair and Meniscal Centralization
by Yohei Maeda, Ryuichi Nakamura, Kaori Matsumoto, Satomi Abe and Hiroshi Ito
Bioengineering 2026, 13(2), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020162 - 29 Jan 2026
Viewed by 686
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated time-dependent changes in anchor hole width (AHW) and their association with postoperative medial meniscus extrusion (MME) in patients undergoing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) with medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair and meniscal centralization. Methods: Thirty knees treated [...] Read more.
Background: This study evaluated time-dependent changes in anchor hole width (AHW) and their association with postoperative medial meniscus extrusion (MME) in patients undergoing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) with medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair and meniscal centralization. Methods: Thirty knees treated with combined OWHTO and MMPRT repair using the centralization technique were retrospectively reviewed. MRI, CT, and second-look arthroscopy were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. AHW of the MMPRT anchor and two centralization anchors (midbody and midbody–posterior, M-anchor and MP-anchor) were measured on multiplanar reconstruction CT images at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year, and their correlations with postoperative MME were analyzed. Results: AHW increased up to 3 months and gradually decreased with surrounding sclerosis by 1 year. The M-anchor showed significantly greater mediolateral (ML) expansion than the MP-anchor and demonstrated a moderate positive correlation between 1-year AHW and MME (r ≈ 0.5, p < 0.01). Second-look arthroscopy confirmed a 90% healing rate of the repaired root. Conclusions: Although OWHTO combined with MMPRT repair and centralization achieved favorable root healing, postoperative MME progression was not fully prevented. Time-dependent ML anchor hole expansion around the M-anchor may indicate persistent micromotion, elongation of the meniscotibial ligament, and degenerative stretch of the repaired meniscus following healing, suggesting that even after successful root healing, ML motion remains difficult to control, highlighting the need for biomechanically optimized fixation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Techniques in Meniscus Repair)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 495 KB  
Systematic Review
Postoperative Weight-Bearing, Range-of-Motion Protocols and Knee Biomechanics After Concomitant Posterolateral Meniscal Root Repair with ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
by Thibaut Noailles, Julien Behr, Nicolas Bouguennec, Loïc Geffroy, César Tourtoulou and Alain Meyer
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 542; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020542 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1458
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Meniscal root tears, particularly those of the posterolateral root, are frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and significantly alter load distribution and knee stability. Surgical repair of the posterolateral meniscal root (PLMR) aims to restore normal biomechanics; however, postoperative [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Meniscal root tears, particularly those of the posterolateral root, are frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and significantly alter load distribution and knee stability. Surgical repair of the posterolateral meniscal root (PLMR) aims to restore normal biomechanics; however, postoperative rehabilitation strategies remain heterogeneous. The objective of this systematic review was to describe and analyze postoperative weight-bearing (WB) and range-of-motion (ROM) protocols following concomitant PLMR repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), integrating both clinical and biomechanical perspectives. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and analyzed biomechanical and clinical studies assessing postoperative WB and ROM management following PLMR repair combined with ACLR. Results: Eleven studies were included, describing heterogeneous postoperative rehabilitation protocols for WB and ROM following posterolateral meniscal root repair with ACLR. Biomechanical data consistently showed that root section increased tibial internal rotation and contact pressure on the lateral tibial plateau, whereas repair restored near-native load sharing. Clinically, most authors recommended non-weight-bearing or toe-touch loading for 4–6 weeks and flexion limited to 0–90° during early rehabilitation. Gradual progression to full loading and motion between 8 and 12 weeks was the most consistent strategy. Conclusions: Although the current evidence is limited and mainly based on low-level studies, available data suggest that a cautious and progressive rehabilitation protocol after PLMR repair with ACLR early controlled motion and delayed full loading may optimize repair healing while protecting graft integrity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Application of Knee Arthroscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1905 KB  
Article
Arthroscopic All-Suture Anchor Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Without a Posteromedial Portal: Clinical Improvement and Healing Despite Persistent Extrusion
by Murat Aşci, Yavuz Şahbat, Mete Gedikbaş, Utkan Sobay, Fırat Erpala and Taner Güneş
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(23), 8272; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238272 - 21 Nov 2025
Viewed by 881
Abstract
Background: It is known that meniscus root tears affect the biomechanics of the knee in a way that is equivalent to a total meniscectomy. Therefore, repair is increasingly favored for meniscal root tears. In our study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and [...] Read more.
Background: It is known that meniscus root tears affect the biomechanics of the knee in a way that is equivalent to a total meniscectomy. Therefore, repair is increasingly favored for meniscal root tears. In our study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of meniscal root repairs with suture anchors. Materials and Methods: Patients who had undergone surgery for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) using suture-anchors between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were excluded if they had a previous infection, a fracture and an operation on the same knee, or osteoarthritis and a follow-up period under one year. The MMPRTs were classified according to the LaPrade classification system. For the functional classification, the range of motion (ROM), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form were used for the postoperative functional assessments. The radiological assessment was performed by measuring the medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and evaluating the signal changes in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee, which was recorded during the last follow-up examination. Results: Thirty-two patients (6M/26F) were included in the study. The mean age was 49.9 ± 5.4 years old, and the follow-up period was 29.6 ± 24.1 months. The LKS improved from 53.7 ± 6.9 to 83.6 ± 5.2 and the IKDC improved from 46.1 ± 6.9 to 83.0 ± 5.5 at the final follow-up control (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). The VAS score decreased from 8.4 ± 0.5 to 2.5 ± 0.9 (p < 0.001). The MRI scan of the knee performed at the last follow-up examination showed no improvement in only one patient. While the MME before surgery was 5.0 ± 2.1 mm, it was 4.6 ± 2.1 mm at the last follow-up examination (p = 0.178). An increase in the Kellgren–Lawrence stage was observed in 4 of our patients (from stage 1 to stage 2 in one patient, from stage 0 to stage 1 in 3 patients). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that repairing MMPRTs using suture-anchors is a valid solution for treatment and prevention in patients with poor prognoses in order to achieve positive results in reducing pain, restoring mobility, improving functional outcomes and avoiding a significant increase in progression to arthrosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1710 KB  
Article
Short-Term Outcomes After Transtibial Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Case Series
by Dan Viorel Nistor, Samuel Piu, Diana Raluca Mihu and Romana von Mengershausen
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7440; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207440 - 21 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1699
Abstract
Background/Objectives: While arthroscopic repair is established for the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT), the relationship between physiotherapy (PT) exposure, meniscal extrusion (ME), and structural healing remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term functional and structural results [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: While arthroscopic repair is established for the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT), the relationship between physiotherapy (PT) exposure, meniscal extrusion (ME), and structural healing remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term functional and structural results after transtibial pull-out (TPO) repair of isolated MMPRT and to explore the influence of patient age and postoperative physiotherapy volume. Methods: A retrospective single-center case series with 14 adults (64% women, age 59 years, body mass index (BMI) 31.0 kg/m2) who underwent TPO repair (April 2022–June 2024). Mean follow-up was 18.4 months. Outcomes included range of motion (ROM), pain levels using visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET), the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and MRI-based ME, cartilage grade, and root-healing status. Postoperative PT volume was assessed with a self-developed, custom questionnaire. Correlations and subgroup analyses (<60 vs. ≥60 years) were performed. Results: Mean postoperative ROM was 121° and IKDC 63.4. Median PT exposure was 25.9 h, and the mean duration from symptom to repair was 215 days. MRI demonstrated complete healing in 70% of cases. A positive correlation was observed between postoperative ME and ROM (p = 0.008), while higher PT volume was associated with greater pain scores. Conclusions: TPO repair appears to be a viable treatment option for selected patients with MMPRT, showing acceptable early outcomes, even in older individuals with higher BMIs or delayed repair. Meniscal healing was frequent, although extrusion progression remained common and may influence the function. The observed links between ME, ROM, and PT-related pain highlight the need for standardized rehabilitation assessment. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to validate these exploratory findings and refine postoperative management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Application of Knee Arthroscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 646 KB  
Article
Saving the Meniscus: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Incidence, Treatment, and Failure Rate of the Main Meniscal Tear Types at 24-Month Follow-Up
by Daniele Screpis, Fjorela Qordja, Luca De Berardinis, Gianluca Piovan, Stefano Magnanelli, Andrea Amarossi, Antonio Pompilio Gigante and Claudio Zorzi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3350; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103350 - 12 May 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5639
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in repair techniques, the failure rates of meniscal surgery are still high. The seven most common tear types—horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs), radial tears (RTs), meniscal ramp lesions (MRLs), meniscal root tears (MRTs), longitudinal tears (LTs), bucket-handle tears (BHMTs), and complex [...] Read more.
Background: Despite advances in repair techniques, the failure rates of meniscal surgery are still high. The seven most common tear types—horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs), radial tears (RTs), meniscal ramp lesions (MRLs), meniscal root tears (MRTs), longitudinal tears (LTs), bucket-handle tears (BHMTs), and complex meniscal tears (CMTs)—were reviewed. The present retrospective observational study aimed to analyze their characteristics, incidence, treatment approach and failure rates of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing meniscal arthroscopic repair. Methods: The database of a high-volume meniscal suture center was examined for lesions managed by all-inside, inside-out, outside-in, or transtibial pull-out techniques from January 2018 to September 2022. Demographic (gender, age at surgery, laterality of the affected knee) and intraoperative data (tear type/site, repair technique, and suture number/combination) were collected in order to calculate the failure rates of the cohort and of each tear type and suture technique. Results: Altogether, 636 procedures met our criteria of having at least a 2-year follow-up. The overall failure rate was 1.98%. The most frequent lesions were HCTs (41.98%), with most injuries being in the body/posterior horn (88.52%) of the right knee (56.92%). Treatment predominantly (92.50%) included all-inside sutures. All-inside repair had the highest failure rate (2.98%), followed by inside-out (1.56%) repair (p = 1.0), whereas outside-in and pull-out techniques never failed. Failure rates by lesion included BHMTs (7.27%), HCTs (2.25%), CMTs (1.49%), and LTs (1.25%); RMT, RML, and MRT repair were always successful. Conclusions: Findings at two years suggest that 1–3 all-inside sutures minimize MRL failure, whereas three or more all-inside sutures or combined techniques seem to be effective for HCTs, LTs, and RTs but not BHMTs. Pull-out repair worked best for complete tears/avulsion types of MRTs, whereas all-inside sutures effectively managed partial lesions. Results for CMTs were inconclusive. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Arthroscopic Surgery for Meniscus and Cartilage Repair)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 728 KB  
Systematic Review
Pressure Sensors for Measuring Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics in Meniscal Root Repair: A Systematic Review
by Khalis Boksh, Beibit Bashabayev, Duncan E. T. Shepherd, Daniel M. Espino, Arijit Ghosh, Randeep Aujla and Tarek Boutefnouchet
Sensors 2025, 25(5), 1507; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051507 - 28 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2198
Abstract
Background: Tibiofemoral contact mechanics (TFCM) is an accepted biomechanical metrics for evaluating the meniscus in its intact, torn, and repaired states. Pressure sensors are increasingly used, with accuracy and repeatability influenced by test conditions, their design, and their properties. To identify factors optimising [...] Read more.
Background: Tibiofemoral contact mechanics (TFCM) is an accepted biomechanical metrics for evaluating the meniscus in its intact, torn, and repaired states. Pressure sensors are increasingly used, with accuracy and repeatability influenced by test conditions, their design, and their properties. To identify factors optimising performance, we performed a systematic review of the literature on their use for measuring TFCM in posterior meniscal root tears. Methods: The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, and Embase were used to perform a systematic review using the PRISMA criteria. As laboratory and surgical setup can influence sensor performance, we collected data on specimen preparation, repair techniques, hardware use, and biomechanical testing parameters. Results: 24 biomechanical studies were included. Specimen preparations were similar across studies with respect to femoral and tibial mounting. Single axial compressive forces were applied between 100 and 1800 N at varying flexion angles (0–90°). Tekscan (Boston, MA, USA) was the commonest sensor used to measure TFCM, followed by digital capacitive sensors and Fujifilm (Tokyo, Japan). Factors influencing their performance included fluid exposure, lack of adequate fixation, non-specific calibration protocols, load saturation exceeding calibration, damaged sensels and inappropriate pre-test conditioning. Conclusions: Understanding potential factors influencing pressure sensors may improve accuracy, area, and pressure distribution measurements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1001 KB  
Article
Comparison of Functional Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Meniscal Repair for Unstable versus Stable Meniscal Tears
by Jin Hyuck Lee, Gyu Bin Lee, Woo Yong Chung, Ji Won Wang, Sun Gyu Han, Hye Chang Rhim, Seung-Beom Han and Ki-Mo Jang
Diagnostics 2024, 14(9), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14090871 - 23 Apr 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3012
Abstract
This study aimed to compare functional outcomes including knee muscle strength in the quadriceps and hamstrings, and proprioception, assessed through dynamic postural stability (overall stability index [OSI]) and self-reported outcomes in the operated and non-operated knees between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with [...] Read more.
This study aimed to compare functional outcomes including knee muscle strength in the quadriceps and hamstrings, and proprioception, assessed through dynamic postural stability (overall stability index [OSI]) and self-reported outcomes in the operated and non-operated knees between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with meniscal repair for unstable (root and radial tears) and stable (longitudinal, horizontal, and bucket handle tears) meniscal tears. A total of 76 patients were randomly selected (41 with ACLR with meniscal repair for unstable meniscal tears and 35 with ACLR with meniscal repair for stable meniscal tears) at three different time points (preoperative, 6 months, and 12 months). Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to investigate the differences in outcomes for between-subject and within-subject factors. In the operated knees, there were no significant differences for functional outcomes between the two groups (all p > 0.05). In the non-operated knees, a significant difference was observed for the OSI between the two groups, which was significantly higher in ACLR with meniscal repair for unstable meniscal tears than for stable meniscal tears at 6 months (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.027), preoperative OSI in the operated knees (p = 0.005), and postoperative OSI in the operated knees at 6 months (p = 0.002) were significant and independent predictors for OSI in the non-operated knees at 6 months postoperatively. Therefore, while no differences were observed in functional outcomes between the two groups in the operated knees, dynamic postural stability was poorer at 6 months postoperatively in the non-operated knees of patients with ACLR with meniscal repair for unstable meniscal tears. Furthermore, a significant correlation was observed between preoperative/postoperative dynamic postural stability in the operated knees and postoperative dynamic postural stability in the non-operated knees. Hence, we recommend incorporating balance exercises for both knees in post-surgical rehabilitation, particularly for patients with unstable meniscal tears. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3447 KB  
Article
Assessment of Surrogate Models for Research on Resistance and Deformation of Repairs of the Human Meniscal Roots: Porcine or Older Human Models?
by Alejandro Peña-Trabalon, Ana Perez-Blanca, Salvador Moreno-Vegas, M. Belen Estebanez-Campos and Maria Prado-Novoa
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 670; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020670 - 12 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1576
Abstract
Meniscal root repair is not routinely recommended for patients over 75 years old, yet surrogate age-unrestricted human or porcine models are used for its evaluation. This study assesses the suitability of older human or porcine meniscus models for in vitro testing of the [...] Read more.
Meniscal root repair is not routinely recommended for patients over 75 years old, yet surrogate age-unrestricted human or porcine models are used for its evaluation. This study assesses the suitability of older human or porcine meniscus models for in vitro testing of the sutured meniscal horn. Three groups of menisci underwent a load-to-failure test with continuous monitoring of the traction force and deformation around the suture: human < 75 years, human ≥ 75 years, and porcine. Both surrogate models were compared to the younger group. The porcine group exhibited a 172.1%-higher traction force before tearing (p < 0.001) and a 174.1%-higher ultimate force (p < 0.001), without there being differences between the human groups. At tissue level, the older group had a 28.7%-lower cut-out stress (p = 0.012) and the porcine group had a 57.2%-higher stress (p < 0.001). Regarding elasticity at the sutured area, a 48.1%-greater deformation rate was observed in the older group (p < 0.001), without difference for the porcine group. In conclusion, neither the porcine nor the older human model demonstrated a clear advantage as a surrogate model for young human sutured meniscal horns. The older human meniscus is preferable for resistance at the specimen level, while the porcine model better represents deformation in the sutured zone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanics of Soft and Hard Tissues)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 871 KB  
Article
Age and Meniscal Extrusion Are Determining Factors of Osteoarthritis Progression after Conservative Treatments for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear
by Young Mo Kim, Yong Bum Joo, Byung Kuk An and Ju-Ho Song
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(12), 2004; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122004 - 3 Dec 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4110
Abstract
Background: With a growing understanding of biomechanical disadvantages following medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT), recent studies have focused on surgical repair of MMPRT. Because not all tears are repairable, surgical indications can be properly established when the outcomes of conservative treatments are [...] Read more.
Background: With a growing understanding of biomechanical disadvantages following medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT), recent studies have focused on surgical repair of MMPRT. Because not all tears are repairable, surgical indications can be properly established when the outcomes of conservative treatments are revealed. This study tried to identify risk factors for osteoarthritis progression after conservative treatments for isolated MMPRT. Materials & Methods: Patients who had conservative treatments for isolated MMPRT during 2013–2016 were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate osteoarthritis progression, those who were followed up for ≤3 years and those who already showed advanced osteoarthritis of Kellgren--Lawrence (K-L) grade 4 at the time of diagnosis were excluded. Because patients with varus malalignment were candidates for realignment osteotomy, conservative treatments for MMPRT were applied to patients with well-aligned knees. Osteoarthritis progression was determined based on the K-L grading system, and risk factors including age, sex, body mass index, lower limb alignment, preoperative K-L grade, meniscal extrusion, and the presence of subchondral bone marrow lesion (BML) were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 42 patients were followed up for 57.4 ± 26.8 months. During that period, osteoarthritis progression was noted in 17 (40.5%) patients. Based on univariate analyses for each risk factor, age, meniscal extrusion, and the presence of subchondral BML were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results showed that age (p = 0.028, odds ratio = 0.87) and meniscal extrusion (p = 0.013, odds ratio = 9.65) were significant risk factors. A receiver operating characteristic curve found that the cutoff age was 63.5 years, with the area under the curve being 0.72 (sensitivity, 68.0%; specificity, 70.6%). Conclusions: About two-fifths of patients who had conservative treatments for MMPRT underwent osteoarthritis progression in the mid to long term. Age and meniscal extrusion were determining factors of osteoarthritis progression. The risk for osteoarthritis progression was decreased when the age of patients was over 63.5 years. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 10300 KB  
Article
Changes in Bone Marrow Lesions Following Root Repair Surgery Using Modified Mason–Allen Stitches in Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears
by Kyu Sung Chung, Jeong Ku Ha, Jin Seong Kim and Jin Goo Kim
Medicina 2022, 58(11), 1601; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111601 - 4 Nov 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3045
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Root repair can prevent osteoarthritis (OA) by restoring hoop tension in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This study aims to investigate bone marrow edema (BME) lesions known to be associated with OA following MMPRTs. Methods: Thirty patients [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Root repair can prevent osteoarthritis (OA) by restoring hoop tension in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This study aims to investigate bone marrow edema (BME) lesions known to be associated with OA following MMPRTs. Methods: Thirty patients with transtibial pull-out repair were recruited. Subchondral BME lesions were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1-year follow-ups. Participants were categorized into three groups: no change of BME lesions (group one), improved BME lesions (group two) and worsened BME lesions (group three). Clinical scores and radiological outcomes, specifically Kellgren–Lawrence grade, medial joint space width and cartilage grade and meniscal extrusion were evaluated and compared between groups. Results: After surgery, twenty-three patients with no BME, three patients with BME lesions on the medial femoral condyle, one patient with BME lesions on the medial tibia plateau and three patients with BME lesions on both were investigated. A total of 20 patients in group one (66.7%) showed no change in BME lesions. In group two, seven patients (23.3%) presented with improved BME lesions. Only three patients (10%) showed worsened BME lesions (group three). Moreover, Lysholm scores and the rate of progression of cartilage grades were significantly worse in group three patients. Meniscal extrusion was significantly reduced in group two, whereas extrusion was significantly progressed in group three. Conclusions: Patients with worsened BME lesions showed less favorable outcomes than other patients. A decrease in meniscal extrusion can have a positive effect on BME lesions after root repair. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Knee Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1354 KB  
Review
Degenerative Meniscus in Knee Osteoarthritis: From Pathology to Treatment
by Nobutake Ozeki, Hideyuki Koga and Ichiro Sekiya
Life 2022, 12(4), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12040603 - 18 Apr 2022
Cited by 96 | Viewed by 15213
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease characterized by chronic knee pain and disability in daily living. The lesion can involve the cartilage as well as the synovium, bone, ligaments, and meniscus, indicating a complicated pathology for knee osteoarthritis. The association with [...] Read more.
Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease characterized by chronic knee pain and disability in daily living. The lesion can involve the cartilage as well as the synovium, bone, ligaments, and meniscus, indicating a complicated pathology for knee osteoarthritis. The association with the meniscus has recently attracted much attention. Meniscal tears can initiate and progress knee osteoarthritis, with deleterious effects on the important roles of the meniscus in load distribution, shock absorption, and stability of the knee joint. Degenerative meniscus lesions are commonly observed in elderly people, but they have less impact on the prognosis of osteoarthritis. However, they are often accompanied by meniscal extrusion, which substantially decreases the hoop function of the meniscus and increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis. When surgical treatment is necessary, meniscal tears should be repaired to the greatest extent possible to preserve meniscus function. Long-term studies show better clinical outcomes and less degenerative osteoarthritis changes following meniscal repair than following partial meniscectomy. For meniscal extrusion repair, centralization techniques have been proposed that involve suturing the meniscus-capsule complex to the edge of the tibial plateau. Advancements in orthobiologics, such as platelet-rich plasma or stem cell therapy, have the potential to prevent the initiation or progression of osteoarthritis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Osteoarthritis: How to Manage Joint Degeneration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop