Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (302)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 638 KB  
Article
Conditional Survival in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Pathologic Complete Response: Results from an Observational Retrospective Multicenter Long-Term Follow-Up Study
by Carlos Cerdán Santacruz, Oscar Cano-Valderrama, Laura Melina Fernández, Ramón Sanz-Ongil, Rocío Santos Rancaño, Miquel Kraft Carre, Francisco Blanco Antona, Inés Aldrey Cao, Alba Correa Bonito, Jesús Cifuentes, Antoni Codina-Cazador, Eloy Espín-Basany, Eduardo García-Granero and Blas Flor Lorente
Cancers 2025, 17(16), 2707; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162707 - 20 Aug 2025
Viewed by 212
Abstract
Introduction/Background: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (NCRT) are a privileged group because of the favorable progression of their disease. However, their follow-up patterns after surgery are similar to those of other groups [...] Read more.
Introduction/Background: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (NCRT) are a privileged group because of the favorable progression of their disease. However, their follow-up patterns after surgery are similar to those of other groups with worse prognosis, with the consequent psychological and economic impact. Methods: This is a retrospective observational multicenter study with data obtained from the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project. Patients with LARC who underwent surgery with curative intent after NCRT and achieved pCR were selected. The last follow-up update was conducted in December 2021. A conditional survival model was used to analyze oncological outcomes during follow-up. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed for the entire cohort of patients and for those who survived at one, two, and three years. Results: A total of 815 patients from 32 hospitals were included. Their mean age was 65.1 years, and 36.1% of them were women. Of the 815 patients, 35 died or experienced recurrence (local or systemic) in the first postoperative year, and 780 were included in the conditional survival analysis one year after surgery. The probability of RFS at 5 years was 86.5% in the whole cohort and 89.4%, 92.9%, and 95.2% for survivors at one, two, and three years, respectively. The probability of recurrence in these same groups was 6.5%, 4.3%, 1.8%, and 0.6%. Conclusions: Follow-up of patients with LARC and pCR after NCRT followed by surgery could be adapted based on conditional survival data showing that the probability of RFS increases as patients remain recurrence-free, and recurrences more than 3 years after treatment are exceptional. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 2931 KB  
Case Report
Successful Treatment of an Advanced Larynx Carcinoma Using Neo-Adjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy and Cisplatin/Radiotherapy for a Patient with Rendu–Osler Disease
by Bruno Chauffert, Tamim Alsuliman, Hanene Oueslati, Abdenour Ouikene, Farid Belkhir, Sana Nemmaoui, Alexandre Cau, Agnes Galez, Thomas Garnier, Valéry Salle and Reda Garidi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5694; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165694 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 312
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Rendu–Osler disease is a rare genetic disease, characterized by widespread telangiectasia that can involve the skin and mucous membranes. The diagnosis is based on spontaneous and recurrent epistaxis; various mucosal and cutaneous telangiectasia at typical sites; visceral manifestations including gastrointestinal telangiectasia [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Rendu–Osler disease is a rare genetic disease, characterized by widespread telangiectasia that can involve the skin and mucous membranes. The diagnosis is based on spontaneous and recurrent epistaxis; various mucosal and cutaneous telangiectasia at typical sites; visceral manifestations including gastrointestinal telangiectasia or pulmonary, cerebral, or hepatic arteriovenous malformation; and a first-degree relative with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx generally develops in patients with a smoking history. It is most often treated by surgery and/or radiotherapy. To our knowledge, these two entities were never reported in the same patient. Methods: We herein report a case of a 51-year-old man with Rendu–Osler disease. He was subsequently diagnosed with a locally advanced well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the vocal cord. Results: The patient received a neo-adjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, with nine weekly injections of paclitaxel (60 mg/m2/week), cisplatin (30 mg/m2/week), and cetuximab (250 mg/m2/week), and three injections of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). This controlled tumor bleeding, and then cisplatin-enhanced radiotherapy helped obtain a complete remission. Conclusions: Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx treatment in the context of active Rendu–Osler disease is challenging. If the wide curative surgical approach is deemed too risky, neo-adjuvant chemo-immunotherapy may present a helpful alternative as it may enhance the conditions in order to perform classical radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2557 KB  
Article
An In Silico Feasibility Study of Dose-Escalated Hypofractionated Proton Therapy for Rectal Cancer
by Erik Almhagen, Ali Alkhiat, Bruno Sorcini, Freja Alpsten, Camilla J. S. Kronborg, Heidi S. Rønde, Marianne G. Guren, Sara Pilskog and Alexander Valdman
Cancers 2025, 17(16), 2627; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162627 - 11 Aug 2025
Viewed by 365
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). If the neoadjuvant treatment results in a clinical complete response (cCR), non-operative management of LARC might be [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). If the neoadjuvant treatment results in a clinical complete response (cCR), non-operative management of LARC might be possible. It is hypothesized that cCR rates will increase with increasing radiotherapy doses. By using proton therapy, doses to organs at risk (OAR) may be decreased. In preparation for a clinical trial on dose-escalated proton therapy for LARC, the purpose of this study is to establish the feasibility of proton therapy for dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy of LARC. Methods: Ten patients, having previously received short course radiotherapy (SCRT) for LARC, were included in this planning study. Two photon plans and two proton plans were created for each patient: one with a standard 5 × 5 Gy fractionation and one dose-escalated up to 5 × 7 Gy. Proton plans were robustly optimized. For all plans the integral dose (ID) was computed, and for the proton plans relative biological effectiveness (RBE) distributions were calculated. Feasibility was assessed in terms of target coverage and OAR doses. Results: All treatment plans satisfied target coverage criteria. Three of the photon and two of the proton dose-escalated plans exceeded recommended OAR objectives. Proton IDs were on average lower by a factor of 1.97 compared to photon IDs. Mean doses to OAR were, in general, lower for protons. All proton RBE values in the escalated target volumes were between 1.09 and 1.16. Conclusions: The proposed dose escalation was found to be feasible. Protons can reduce the integral dose and mean doses to OARs compared to photons in both the dose-escalated and non-escalated cases. Differences in RBE between escalated and standard fractionation were small. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Advance of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 419 KB  
Review
Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions
by Masayoshi Iwamoto, Kazuki Ueda and Junichiro Kawamura
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2540; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152540 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 925
Abstract
Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains a major clinical challenge due to its high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Although total mesorectal excision (TME) has been established as the gold standard surgical approach, high recurrence rates associated with surgery alone have [...] Read more.
Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains a major clinical challenge due to its high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Although total mesorectal excision (TME) has been established as the gold standard surgical approach, high recurrence rates associated with surgery alone have driven the development of multimodal preoperative strategies, such as radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. More recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)—which integrates systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery—and non-operative management (NOM) for patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) have further expanded treatment options. These advances aim not only to improve oncologic outcomes but also to enhance quality of life (QOL) by reducing long-term morbidity and preserving organ function. However, several unresolved issues persist, including the optimal sequencing of therapies, precise risk stratification, accurate evaluation of treatment response, and effective surveillance protocols for NOM. The advent of molecular biomarkers, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence (AI) presents new opportunities for individualized treatment and more accurate prognostication. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of preoperative treatment for LARC, critically examines emerging strategies and their supporting evidence, and discusses future directions to optimize both oncological and patient-centered outcomes. By integrating clinical, molecular, and technological advances, the management of rectal cancer is moving toward truly personalized medicine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer)
14 pages, 662 KB  
Article
Weekly Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Pandemic-Era Evaluation
by Yi-Ting Hwang, Cheng-Yen Chuang and Chien-Chih Chen
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1326; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081326 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 243
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer care, prompting adaptations to reduce patient exposure while preserving treatment efficacy. This retrospective observational study compared a weekly cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen to the standard monthly regimen for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer care, prompting adaptations to reduce patient exposure while preserving treatment efficacy. This retrospective observational study compared a weekly cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen to the standard monthly regimen for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 91 patients, divided into two cohorts: weekly chemotherapy (n = 30) and standard chemotherapy (n = 61). Treatment assignment was based on hospital policy changes during the pandemic, with weekly outpatient chemotherapy implemented after November 2022 to conserve inpatient resources. All patients received radiotherapy at 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The weekly regimen consisted of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2, administered over 1–2 h weekly, while the standard regimen administered the same doses over four consecutive days on weeks 1 and 5. Primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The response rates were similar between groups (weekly: 86.7% vs. standard: 90.2%; p = 0.724). The weekly regimen group showed a higher pCR (40.0% vs. 26.2%; p = 0.181) and significantly lower recurrence (26.7% vs. 52.5%; p = 0.020). Mortality was also reduced in the weekly group (6.7% vs. 34.4%; p = 0.004), though the follow-up duration was shorter (10.6 vs. 22.8 months; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this retrospective observational study, weekly cisplatin and 5-FU demonstrated comparable efficacy to the standard regimen, with potential advantages in reducing recurrence and mortality. This modified approach may be a viable alternative for maintaining oncologic outcomes while minimizing the burden on healthcare systems during pandemic conditions, although prospective validation is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 482 KB  
Article
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Evaluation of Sequencing, Response, and Toxicity in a Single-Institution Cohort
by Maria Cristina Barba, Paola De Franco, Donatella Russo, Elisa Cavalera, Elisa Ciurlia, Sara De Matteis, Giuseppe Di Paola, Corradino Federico, Angela Leone, Antonella Papaleo, Bianca Santo, Dino Rubini, Giuseppe Rubini and Angela Sardaro
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2416; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152416 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 554
Abstract
Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). By administering both chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and systemic chemotherapy (CHT) pre-surgery, TNT is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS), reduced distant metastases, and higher pathological complete [...] Read more.
Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). By administering both chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and systemic chemotherapy (CHT) pre-surgery, TNT is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS), reduced distant metastases, and higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Materials and Methods: This study included patients with LARC who received various TNT schedules: induction chemotherapy (iCHT), consolidation chemotherapy (cCHT), or a combination of both (sandwichCHT). We analyzed treatment adherence, toxicity, and pathological response. Local and distant disease recurrence, as well as survival outcomes, were also evaluated. Results: Between May 2021 and January 2025, 70 patients received TNT. Treatment included iCHT (41%), sandwichCHT (49%), and cCHT (10%). Most patients (94%) received long-course radiotherapy (LCRT). Overall, TNT was well tolerated, with grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity during CRT being the most common frequent adverse event (33%). Disease progression during TNT was noted in five patients (7%); three of these patients were receiving chemotherapy, while two underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor. A watch-and-wait strategy was adopted for five patients (7%) following TNT. Surgical procedures performed included anterior resection (92%), abdominoperineal resection (7%), and local excision (1%). Pathological assessment revealed an overall pCR rate of 30%. With a median follow-up of 17 months, no patients experienced local recurrence. Post-surgery, 10 patients (17%) developed disease progression. The median DFS was 14.7 months. Five patients (7%) died during the follow-up period, with only one death attributed to causes other than disease progression. Conclusions: In this cohort of LARC patients, TNT demonstrated favorable tolerability and encouraging short-term efficacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Pathophysiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1231 KB  
Review
Narrative Review: Predictive Biomarkers of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy or Total Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
by Joao Victor Machado Carvalho, Jeremy Meyer, Frederic Ris, André Durham, Aurélie Bornand, Alexis Ricoeur, Claudia Corrò and Thibaud Koessler
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2229; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132229 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1034
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) very often requires a neoadjuvant multimodal approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) encompasses treatments like chemoradiotherapy (CRT), short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), radiotherapy (RT) or a combination of either of these two with additional induction or consolidation chemotherapy, namely [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) very often requires a neoadjuvant multimodal approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) encompasses treatments like chemoradiotherapy (CRT), short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), radiotherapy (RT) or a combination of either of these two with additional induction or consolidation chemotherapy, namely total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). In case of complete radiological and clinical response, the non-operative watch-and-wait strategy can be adopted in selected patients. This strategy is impacted by a regrowth rate of approximately 30%. Predicting biomarkers of tumor response to NAT could improve guidance of clinicians during clinical decision making, improving treatment outcomes and decreasing unnecessary treatment exposure. To this day, there is no validated biomarker to predict tumor response to any NAT strategies in clinical use. Most research focused on CRT neglects the study of other regimens. Methods: We conducted a narrative literature review which aimed at summarizing the status of biomarkers predicting tumor response to NAT other than CRT in LARC. Results: Two hundred and fourteen articles were identified. After screening, twenty-one full-text articles were included. Statistically significant markers associated with improved tumor response pre-treatment were as follows: low circulating CEA levels; BCL-2 expression; high cellular expression of Ku70, MIB-1(Ki-67) and EGFR; low cellular expression of VEGF, hPEBP4 and nuclear β-catenin; the absence of TP53, SMAD4, KRAS and LRP1B mutations; the presence of the G-allel of LCS-6; and MRI features such as the conventional biexponential fitting pseudodiffusion (Dp) mean value and standard deviation (SD), the variable projection Dp mean value and lymph node characteristics (short axis, smooth contour, homogeneity and Zhang et al. radiomic score). In the interval post-treatment and before surgery, significant markers were as follows: a reduction in the median value of circulating free DNA, higher presence of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, lower presence of CTLA4+ or PD1+ regulatory T cells and standardized index of shape changes on MRI. Conclusions: Responders to neoadjuvant SCRT and RT tended to have a tumor microenvironment with an immune–active phenotype, whereas responders to TNT tended to have a less active tumor profile. Although some biomarkers hold great promise, scarce publications, inconsistent results, low statistical power, and low reproducibility prevent them from reliably predicting tumor response following NAT. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1050 KB  
Article
Quantitative Method for Monitoring Tumor Evolution During and After Therapy
by Paolo Castorina, Filippo Castiglione, Gianluca Ferini, Stefano Forte and Emanuele Martorana
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070275 - 28 Jun 2025
Viewed by 520
Abstract
Objectives: The quantitative analysis of tumor progression—monitored during and immediately after therapeutic interventions—can yield valuable insights into both long-term disease dynamics and treatment efficacy. Methods: We used a computational approach designed to support clinical decision-making, with a focus on personalized patient care, [...] Read more.
Objectives: The quantitative analysis of tumor progression—monitored during and immediately after therapeutic interventions—can yield valuable insights into both long-term disease dynamics and treatment efficacy. Methods: We used a computational approach designed to support clinical decision-making, with a focus on personalized patient care, based on modeling therapy effects using effective parameters of the Gompertz law. Results: The method is applied to data from in vivo models undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, as well as conventional and FLASH radiation treatments. Conclusions: This user-friendly, phenomenological model captures distinct phases of treatment response and identifies a critical dose threshold distinguishing complete response from partial response or tumor regrowth. These findings lay the groundwork for real-time quantitative monitoring of disease progression during therapy and contribute to a more tailored and predictive clinical strategy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 922 KB  
Review
Controversies and Perspectives in the Current Management of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer—A Systematic Review
by Roxana Elena Stefan, Rodica Daniela Birla, Mircea Gheorghe, Daniela Elena Dinu, Petre Angel Hoara, Diana Ciuc, Valeriu-Gabi Dinca and Silviu Constantinoiu
Life 2025, 15(7), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15071011 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 980
Abstract
Traditionally, the therapeutic approach to rectal cancer has involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection, and, in some cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to present current advances and ongoing controversies in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), with [...] Read more.
Traditionally, the therapeutic approach to rectal cancer has involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection, and, in some cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to present current advances and ongoing controversies in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), with a particular focus on clarifying the role of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in contemporary treatment strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in Medline/PubMed using various keyword combinations, including “rectal cancer/neoplasia” and“therapy” or “neoadjuvant therapy” or “TNT”, and included articles published between 2015 and 2025. Results: The association of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with preoperative systemic chemotherapy has led to the current concept of total neoadjuvant therapy. The advantages of preoperative chemotherapy include better patient compliance, a decrease in the rate of local recurrence and distant metastases via the early destruction of infra-clinical micrometastases, and higher rates of pathological complete response. All of these have led to the inclusion of this strategy in treatment guidelines for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Conclusions: However, the selection of patients with advanced rectal tumors for optimal therapy requires comprehensive imaging assessments, molecular and genetic testing, and a multidisciplinary team to determine the most appropriate total neoadjuvant therapy approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 691 KB  
Review
Multimodal Preoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Existing Guidelines
by Ionut Negoi
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1132; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071132 - 24 Jun 2025
Viewed by 825
Abstract
Rectal cancer management necessitates a rigorous multidisciplinary strategy, emphasizing precise staging and detailed risk stratification to inform optimal therapeutic decision-making. Obtaining an accurate histological diagnosis before initiating treatment is essential. Comprehensive staging integrates clinical evaluation, thorough medical history analysis, assessment of carcinoembryonic antigen [...] Read more.
Rectal cancer management necessitates a rigorous multidisciplinary strategy, emphasizing precise staging and detailed risk stratification to inform optimal therapeutic decision-making. Obtaining an accurate histological diagnosis before initiating treatment is essential. Comprehensive staging integrates clinical evaluation, thorough medical history analysis, assessment of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and computed tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen and thorax. High-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), utilizing dedicated rectal protocols, is critical for identifying recurrence risks and delineating precise anatomical relationships. Endoscopic ultrasound further refines staging accuracy by determining the tumor infiltration depth in early-stage cancers, while preoperative colonoscopy effectively identifies synchronous colorectal lesions. In early-stage rectal cancers (T1–T2, N0, and M0), radical surgical resection remains the standard of care, although transanal local excision can be selectively indicated for certain T1N0 tumors. In contrast, locally advanced rectal cancers (T3, T4, and N+) characterized by microsatellite stability or proficient mismatch repair are optimally managed with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which combines chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin-based systemic chemotherapy. Additionally, tumors exhibiting high microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency respond favorably to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The evaluation of tumor response following neoadjuvant therapy, utilizing MRI and endoscopic assessments, facilitates individualized treatment planning, including non-operative approaches for patients with confirmed complete clinical responses who comply with rigorous follow-up. Recent advancements in molecular characterization, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy highlight a significant evolution towards personalized medicine. The effective integration of these innovations requires enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration to improve patient prognosis and quality of life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Colorectal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 732 KB  
Systematic Review
Gut-Microbiome Signatures Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
by Ielmina Domilescu, Bogdan Miutescu, Florin George Horhat, Alina Popescu, Camelia Nica, Ana Maria Ghiuchici, Eyad Gadour, Ioan Sîrbu and Delia Hutanu
Metabolites 2025, 15(6), 412; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060412 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 669
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Rectal cancer management increasingly relies on watch-and-wait strategies after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Accurate, non-invasive prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) remains elusive. Emerging evidence suggests that gut-microbiome composition modulates radio-chemosensitivity. We systematically reviewed primary studies that correlated baseline or on-treatment [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Rectal cancer management increasingly relies on watch-and-wait strategies after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Accurate, non-invasive prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) remains elusive. Emerging evidence suggests that gut-microbiome composition modulates radio-chemosensitivity. We systematically reviewed primary studies that correlated baseline or on-treatment gut-microbiome features with nCRT response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed were searched from inception to 30 April 2025. Eligibility required (i) prospective or retrospective human studies of LARC, (ii) faecal or mucosal microbiome profiling by 16S, metagenomics, or metatranscriptomics, and (iii) response assessment using tumour-regression grade or pCR. Narrative synthesis and random-effects proportion meta-analysis were performed where data were homogeneous. Results: Twelve studies (n = 1354 unique patients, median sample = 73, range 22–735) met inclusion. Four independent machine-learning models achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve AUROC ≥ 0.85 for pCR prediction. Consistently enriched taxa in responders included Lachnospiraceae bacterium, Blautia wexlerae, Roseburia spp., and Intestinimonas butyriciproducens. Non-responders showed over-representation of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis, and Prevotella spp. Two studies linked butyrate-producing modules to radiosensitivity, whereas nucleotide-biosynthesis pathways conferred resistance. Pooled pCR rate in patients with a “butyrate-rich” baseline profile was 44% (95% CI 35–54) versus 21% (95% CI 15–29) in controls (I2 = 18%). Conclusions: Despite heterogeneity, convergent functional and taxonomic signals underpin a microbiome-based radiosensitivity axis in LARC. Multi-centre validation cohorts and intervention trials manipulating these taxa, such as prebiotics or live-biotherapeutics, are warranted before clinical deployment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Gut Microbiome Metabolomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 480 KB  
Article
Surgical Timing and Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: Insights from One- and Two-Stage Esophagectomies in a Polish Cohort
by Bartłomiej Strzelec, Piotr Paweł Chmielewski, Wojciech Kielan and Julia Rudno-Rudzińska
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4301; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124301 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 454
Abstract
Objectives: Esophagectomy is a central component of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, with both one- and two-stage procedures frequently employed. However, these procedures are associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess the rates and types of [...] Read more.
Objectives: Esophagectomy is a central component of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, with both one- and two-stage procedures frequently employed. However, these procedures are associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess the rates and types of complications following one- and two-stage esophagectomies, and to identify predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: We analyzed clinical data from patients undergoing one-stage (Ivor Lewis) or two-stage esophagectomies. Postoperative complications were defined as events occurring within 30 days after surgery. Variables such as patient demographics, clinical staging, histological tumor grade, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were assessed for their association with complications. Statistical analyses included logistic regression and chi-squared tests. Results: Among 61 patients, postoperative complications occurred in 24.6% of cases. The most frequent were pneumonia (22.2%), anastomotic leakage (22.2%), and hemothorax (27.8%). Significant predictors of complications included intraoperative disease staging, histological tumor grade, and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The odds ratio for complications following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 8.75. The frequency of anastomotic leakage was similar in one- and two-stage procedures (30.8% vs. 26.3%, respectively). Conclusions: Postoperative complications remain a significant challenge in esophageal cancer surgery, particularly in the context of advanced disease or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These findings underscore the necessity for precise surgical planning and comprehensive postoperative care to mitigate risks and optimize patient outcomes. While postoperative risk is high, it is primarily driven by tumor characteristics and preoperative therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastroesophageal Cancer: Outcomes and Therapeutic Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 329 KB  
Review
Early Molecular Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Oral Cancer
by Po-Chih Hsu, Jen-Hsuan Huang, Chung-Che Tsai, Ya-Hsuan Lin and Chan-Yen Kuo
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(6), 452; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47060452 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 864
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), a major subtype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), is a significant global health burden owing to its late-stage diagnosis and poor prognosis. Recent advancements in molecular biology, genomics, and imaging have transformed the landscape of [...] Read more.
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), a major subtype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), is a significant global health burden owing to its late-stage diagnosis and poor prognosis. Recent advancements in molecular biology, genomics, and imaging have transformed the landscape of OSCC diagnosis and treatment. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of early molecular diagnostic strategies, including biomarker discovery using next-generation sequencing, liquid biopsy, and salivary exosomal microRNAs. In addition, we highlight the emerging role of non-invasive optical imaging technologies and their clinical integration for improved surgical precision and early lesion detection. This review also discusses evolving therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and patient-centered multimodal regimens tailored through molecular profiling. We emphasized balancing therapeutic efficacy with the quality of life in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. The convergence of multi-omics, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine holds promise for revolutionizing early detection and personalized treatment of OSCC, ultimately improving patient survival and clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Early Molecular Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Tumors)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 3449 KB  
Article
Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment on Target Expression in Rectal Cancer for Near-Infrared Tumor Imaging
by Elham Zonoobi, Lisanne K. A. Neijenhuis, Annelieke A. Lemij, Daan G. J. Linders, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad, Shadhvi S. Bhairosingh, N. Geeske Dekker-Ensink, Ronald L. P. van Vlierberghe, Koen C. M. J. Peeters, Fabian A. Holman, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Denise E. Hilling, A. Stijn L. P. Crobach, Alexander L. Vahrmeijer and Peter J. K. Kuppen
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 1958; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17121958 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 525
Abstract
Background: Rectal cancer (RC) patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may qualify for a watch-and-wait (W&W) approach. However, a 20–30% local tumor regrowth rate highlights challenges in identifying true responders. This study explores markers for future near-infrared fluorescence [...] Read more.
Background: Rectal cancer (RC) patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may qualify for a watch-and-wait (W&W) approach. However, a 20–30% local tumor regrowth rate highlights challenges in identifying true responders. This study explores markers for future near-infrared fluorescence tumor imaging by endoscopy to differentiate responders and the effect of nCRT on their expression. Methods: RC samples (n = 51) were collected from both pre-treatment biopsies and corresponding post-treatment surgical specimens. Samples were categorized by treatment response and determined using tumor regression grade (TRG) scoring. Immunohistochemistry assessed the expression of CEA, EpCAM, EGFR, and c-MET in tumors and adjacent normal tissues. Expression levels were quantified using H-scores (0–3), combining the percentage and intensity of stained cells. Pre- and post-treatment H-scores were compared to evaluate the impact of nCRT. Results: CEA, EpCAM, and c-MET were overexpressed in tumor tissue as compared to adjacent healthy mucosa in 100% (51/51), 98.4% (50/51), and 92% (47/51) of tumor biopsies, respectively, while EGFR showed no overexpression. A tumor-to-normal (T/N) ratio ≥ 2 was considered sufficient for differentiation in molecular fluorescence imaging. In pre-treatment biopsy samples, c-MET showed the highest T/N expression ratio (53% of the samples ≥ 2), followed by CEA (26.3%) and EpCAM (16%). Following nCRT treatment, CEA and c-MET maintained a ≥ 2 differential expression in 45% of all samples, whereas EpCAM exhibited this difference in only 9.2% of cases. Neoadjuvant therapy even significantly improved the T/N expression ratio for CEA and c-MET (p < 0.01) and EpCAM (p < 0.05), while EGFR expression remained lower than adjacent normal tissue. Significant increases in all marker expressions were observed in minimal responders (TRG4/5, p < 0.01–0.001), while near-complete responders (TRG2) exhibited non-significant changes in CEA, c-MET, and EGFR expression. Conclusions: c-MET and CEA emerged as optimal tumor imaging targets, showing sustained differential expression after nCRT. In vivo fluorescence-guided endoscopy using probes against these markers could play a role in future clinical decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Biomarkers—Detection and Evaluation of Response to Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 203 KB  
Review
The Role of Osimertinib in Stage I–II Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Activating EGFR Mutation
by Cesare Gridelli, Emanuela Nuccio and Francesca Casaluce
Targets 2025, 3(2), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/targets3020020 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 726
Abstract
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with only approximately 30% of new diagnoses manifesting with localized stages IA–IIA. Osimertinib is a third-generation inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is used for treating metastatic, locally [...] Read more.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with only approximately 30% of new diagnoses manifesting with localized stages IA–IIA. Osimertinib is a third-generation inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is used for treating metastatic, locally advanced, and early-stage NSCLC expressing common EGFR mutations. Two phase III clinical trials supported yresectable locally advanced disease, consisting of the ADAURA and LAURA studies, respectively. On the other hand, conflicting data on neoadjuvant efficacy led to the design of the ongoing Neo-ADAURA trial. In this review, we describe the pivotal trials that led to the approval of osimertinib use as an adjuvant treatment in radically resected NSCLC patients and as maintenance therapy after chemoradiotherapy. We also summarize the principal ongoing clinical trials in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Finally, we analyze several issues about the use of osimertinib in those different early settings while also depicting future perspectives and the potential evolution of treatment strategies. Full article
Back to TopTop