Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (16)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ovarian cancer fertility sparing surgery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 675 KB  
Review
Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma: Integrating Molecular Stratification into Surgical and Therapeutic Management
by Mauro Francesco Pio Maiorano, Brigida Anna Maiorano, Gennaro Cormio and Vera Loizzi
Biomedicines 2025, 13(5), 1198; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051198 - 14 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1613
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare and biologically distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, typically presenting at an early stage in younger women. Unlike high-grade serous carcinoma, MOC is characterized by unique molecular features—including frequent KRAS mutations and HER2 amplifications—and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare and biologically distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, typically presenting at an early stage in younger women. Unlike high-grade serous carcinoma, MOC is characterized by unique molecular features—including frequent KRAS mutations and HER2 amplifications—and exhibits limited sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. These differences highlight the need for individualized treatment strategies guided by molecular and histological profiling. This review aims to integrate current evidence on the clinical management of MOC with emerging insights into its molecular biology, with a focus on how these factors influence surgical decision-making, fertility preservation, and adjuvant therapy selection. Methods: We performed a comprehensive narrative review of the literature, synthesizing findings from retrospective cohorts, molecular studies, and clinical guidelines relevant to the surgical, reproductive, and therapeutic management of MOC. Results: Histologic subtype—expansile versus infiltrative—plays a critical role in guiding lymphadenectomy as lymph node metastases are rare (<1%) in expansile tumors but occur in up to 23% of infiltrative cases. Complete surgical staging remains essential for accurate prognostication, yet tailored approaches may reduce overtreatment in low-risk patients. Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) appears safe in FIGO stage IA expansile MOC, with favorable reproductive outcomes, while higher-stage or infiltrative cases warrant caution. Given MOC’s chemoresistance, the role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage disease remains debated. Targeted strategies, including MEK inhibitors and HER2-directed therapies, are under investigation and may benefit selected molecular subgroups. Conclusions: MOC requires a nuanced, biomarker-informed approach. This review advocates for personalized, evidence-based management supported by multidisciplinary evaluation while underscoring the urgent need for prospective studies and biomarker-driven clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Gynecologic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 631 KB  
Article
Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Non-Epithelial Ovarian Malignancies: Ten-Year Retrospective Study of Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes
by Ivana Likic Ladjevic, Jelena Dotlic, Katarina Stefanovic, Branislav Milosevic, Aleksandra Beleslin, Olga Mihaljevic, Jovan Bila, Ivana Vukovic, Milos Radojevic and Zoran Vilendecic
Cancers 2025, 17(8), 1304; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17081304 - 12 Apr 2025
Viewed by 675
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Due to the rarity and histological heterogeneity of non-epithelial ovarian cancers (NEOCs), monitoring their reproductive and oncological outcomes is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with NEOCs treated with fertility-sparing surgery over the past [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Due to the rarity and histological heterogeneity of non-epithelial ovarian cancers (NEOCs), monitoring their reproductive and oncological outcomes is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with NEOCs treated with fertility-sparing surgery over the past 10 years at our tertiary referral university clinic. Methods: This retrospective study included all the NEOC patients diagnosed and treated with fertility-sparing surgery from 2010 to 2019. The patient demographic and clinical characteristics; data regarding the treatment andthe clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings during follow-up; and disease recurrences were recorded. In this study, the recurrence-free survival and the overall survival were the oncological outcomes. The reproductive outcomes were assessed as attempting and achieving pregnancy. Results: This study included 39 patients. The most frequent NEOCs were granulosa cell tumors (53.8%). The majority of the tumors were in the IA or IC1 stage. The initial therapy was generally a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (30.8%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 48.7% of the patients. An NEOC recurrence was registered in 25.6% of the patients, mostly during the first two postoperative years. The recurrence-free survival was 76.92%. A regression analysis showed that amore advanced stage of NEOC was the most important predictor of disease recurrence. The overall survival rate was 87.2%, with a mean time to an adverse outcome of 23.01 +/−10.68 months. The regression analysis showed that better survival depended mostly on not having disease recurrence. After treatment, ten patients tried to conceive and seven succeeded. All the children were in good condition upon birth. Conclusions: Fertility-sparing treatment for NEOCs was proven as a safe and successful option in terms of both oncological and reproductive outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 764 KB  
Article
Real Implication of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer: Reproductive Outcomes
by Marta Heras, Maria Alonso-Espias, Octavio Arencibia, Lucas Minig, Lola Marti, Maria Dolores Diestro, Juan Cespedes, Isabel Niguez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez, Berta Diaz-Feijoo, Antoni Llueca, Claudia Rosado, Sara Iacoponi, Carlos Lopez de la Manzanara, Sara Morales, Maria Jose Fernandez-Galguera, Ana Cano, Mikel Gorostidi and Ignacio Zapardiel
Diagnostics 2024, 14(13), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131424 - 3 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1798
Abstract
Background: to prove the effectivity of fertility-sparing procedures in early-stage ovarian cancer by assessing pregnancy rates and obstetrical outcomes. Methods: we performed a retrospective multicenter study among 55 Spanish hospitals, collecting patients from 18 to 40 years old with diagnosis of early-stage ovarian [...] Read more.
Background: to prove the effectivity of fertility-sparing procedures in early-stage ovarian cancer by assessing pregnancy rates and obstetrical outcomes. Methods: we performed a retrospective multicenter study among 55 Spanish hospitals, collecting patients from 18 to 40 years old with diagnosis of early-stage ovarian cancer, epithelial (EOC) or non-epithelial (non-EOC), from January 2010 to December 2019. Data on the use of assisted reproductive techniques, pregnancy attempts and obstetrical outcomes were collected. Results: a total of 150 patients met inclusion criteria, 70 (46.6%) EOC and 80 (53.4%) non-EOC. Pregnancy attempts were reported in 51 (34%) patients, with 42 (28%) patients carrying the pregnancy to term. Among them, 30 (71.4%) underwent surgery alone and 12 (28.6%) had additional postoperative chemotherapy. A total of 32 (76.1% patients) had spontaneous pregnancies and 10 (23.9%) required in vitro fertilization. There was only one (2.4%) complication reported. Vaginal delivery was reported in twenty-nine (69%) patients and cesarean section in five (11.9%) patients. Conclusions: fertility-sparing management for ovarian cancer seems to be an option with proven good pregnancy rates and low complications. The selection of patients must consider strict criteria in order to maintain a good prognosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 230 KB  
Review
Fertility Preservation in Cervical Cancer—Treatment Strategies and Indications
by Lina Salman and Allan Covens
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(1), 296-306; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31010019 - 4 Jan 2024
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 5981
Abstract
Cervical cancer is frequently diagnosed in women during their reproductive years, and fertility preservation is an essential part of their cancer treatment. In highly selected patients with early stage, low-risk cervical cancer and a tumor size ≤ 2 cm, several treatment strategies can [...] Read more.
Cervical cancer is frequently diagnosed in women during their reproductive years, and fertility preservation is an essential part of their cancer treatment. In highly selected patients with early stage, low-risk cervical cancer and a tumor size ≤ 2 cm, several treatment strategies can be offered for patients wishing to preserve fertility, including radical/simple trachelectomy or conization with pelvic lymph node assessment. Trachelectomy can be performed through a vaginal, abdominal, or minimally invasive approach and has been shown to have an equivalent oncologic outcome compared to radical hysterectomy. All surgical approaches for radical trachelectomy seem to have excellent survival with comparable oncologic outcomes. Nevertheless, patients undergoing vaginal trachelectomy have better obstetric outcomes compared to the other routes. In patients with larger tumors (2–4 cm), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery is an alternative option. Several chemotherapy regimens have been used for this indication, with a pathologic complete response rate of 17–73%. For locally advanced diseases that require radical hysterectomy or primary chemoradiation, fertility preservation can be performed using oocyte, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, as well as ovarian transposition. For these patients, future pregnancy is possible through surrogacy. In addition to fertility preservation, ovarian transposition, where the ovaries are repositioned outside of the radiation field, is performed to maintain ovarian hormonal function and prevent premature ovarian failure. In summary, fertility-preservation treatment strategies for patients with early stage cervical cancer are continuously evolving, and less radical surgeries are becoming more acceptable. Additional and ongoing evidence is helping determine the impact of conservative procedures on oncologic and obstetric outcomes in these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgery Advances in Gynecologic Tumors)
12 pages, 718 KB  
Article
Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early-Stage Borderline Ovarian Tumors and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center Study
by Mu-En Ko, Yi-Heng Lin, Kuan-Ju Huang, Wen-Chun Chang and Bor-Ching Sheu
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5327; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225327 - 8 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2504
Abstract
This study examined treatment outcomes, including preserved fertility, menstrual regularity, and pregnancy outcomes, in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). Patients with stage I EOC and BOTs who were aged 18–45 [...] Read more.
This study examined treatment outcomes, including preserved fertility, menstrual regularity, and pregnancy outcomes, in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). Patients with stage I EOC and BOTs who were aged 18–45 years and underwent FSS between 2007 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Significant differences between various subgroups in terms of disease recurrence, menstrual irregularity due to the disease, and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. A total of 71 patients with BOTs and 33 patients with EOC were included. In the BOT group, the median age was 30 (range, 19–44) years. Recurrence occurred in eight patients, with one case exhibiting a malignant transformation into mucinous EOC. Among the 35 married patients with BOTs, 20 successfully conceived, resulting in 23 live births and 3 spontaneous abortions. A higher pregnancy rate was observed in those without prior childbirth (82.4%) than in those who had prior childbirth (33.3%). In the EOC group, the median age was 34 (range, 22–42) years. Recurrence occurred in one patient. Menstrual regularity was maintained in 69.7% of the patients. Among the 14 married patients in this group, 12 achieved a total of 15 pregnancies (including 2 twin pregnancies), 16 live births, and 1 spontaneous abortion. The results of the study confirmed that FSS is a favorable surgical option for young women with early-stage BOTs or EOC who wish to preserve their fertility. However, additional investigations are needed to validate these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 733 KB  
Article
Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early Ovarian Malignancies
by Julia S. M. Zimmermann, Pauline Ramisch, Marc P. Radosa, Christoph G. Radosa, Askin C. Kaya, Sara Y. Brucker, Florin A. Taran, Uwe A. Ulrich, Andreas Hackethal, Martin Deeken, Marc Sütterlin, Benjamin Tuschy, Erich-Franz Solomayer and Julia C. Radosa
Cancers 2023, 15(20), 5099; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15205099 - 22 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2106
Abstract
The demand for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has increased in the last decade due to increased maternal age, increased incidence of ovarian malignancies in younger patients, and technical advances in surgery. Data on oncological safety and fertility outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer after [...] Read more.
The demand for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has increased in the last decade due to increased maternal age, increased incidence of ovarian malignancies in younger patients, and technical advances in surgery. Data on oncological safety and fertility outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer after laparoscopic FSS are sparse, but some retrospective studies have shown that open FSS may be offered to selected patients. We assessed the role of minimally invasive FSS in comparison with radical surgery (RS) in terms of oncological safety and reproductive outcomes after FSS in this multicenter study. Eighty patients with FIGO stage I/II ovarian cancer treated with laparoscopic FSS or RS between 01/2000 and 10/2018 at the participating centers (comprehensive gynecological cancer centers with minimally invasive surgical expertise) were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively kept data. Case–control (n = 40 each) matching according to the FIGO stage was performed. Progression-free survival [150 (3–150) and 150 (5–150) months; p = 0.61] and overall survival [36 (3–150) and 50 (1–275) months; p = 0.65] did not differ between the FSS and RS groups. Eight (25.8%) women became pregnant after FSS, resulting in seven (22.5%) deliveries; three (37.5%) patients conceived after in vitro fertilization, and five (62.5%) conceived spontaneously. Laparoscopic FSS seems to be applicable and oncologically safe for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, with adequate fertility outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Oncology: State-of-the-Art Research in Germany)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1992 KB  
Article
Obstetric Results after Fertility-Sparing Management of Non-Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
by Szymon Piątek, Iwona Szymusik, Piotr Sobiczewski, Wojciech Michalski, Magdalena Kowalska, Mariusz Ołtarzewski and Mariusz Bidziński
Cancers 2023, 15(16), 4170; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164170 - 18 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1800
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the recurrence and birth rates among patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: The study included 146 patients with germ cell (GCT, n = 84) and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST, n = 62), who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered [...] Read more.
Purpose: To assess the recurrence and birth rates among patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: The study included 146 patients with germ cell (GCT, n = 84) and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST, n = 62), who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 86 (58.9%) patients. Most cases (133 out of 146) were staged FIGO I. Results: The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 91% and 83%, respectively. The recurrence risk was not associated with tumor histology, stage or age. Twenty-four months after the treatment, the rate of recurrence was higher than the rate of childbearing. The childbearing rates kept rising after the treatment and exceeded the rate of recurrence after 2 years. The cumulative incidence rates of birth 36, 60 and 120 months after treatment were 13.24%, 20.75%, and 42.37%, respectively. Chemotherapy was not related to childbearing. The patients’ age was related to the chance of childbearing. Conclusions: The prognoses of GCT and SCST are similar. Close follow-ups along with contraception should be offered to women during the first two years after treatment due to the increased risk of recurrence. After this period, relapses are rare and women can safely become pregnant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fertility and Pregnancy in Cancer Patients: Illusion or Reality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 262 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Borderline Ovarian Tumor Recurrence Rate after Surgery with or without Fertility-Sparing Approach: Results of a Retrospective Analysis
by Basilio Pecorino, Antonio Simone Laganà, Liliana Mereu, Martina Ferrara, Grazia Carrara, Andrea Etrusco, Mariano Catello Di Donna, Vito Chiantera, Giuseppe Cucinella, Fabio Barra, Péter Török and Paolo Scollo
Healthcare 2023, 11(13), 1922; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131922 - 3 Jul 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3178
Abstract
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) comprise 15–20% of primary ovarian neoplasms and represent an independent disease entity among epithelial ovarian cancers. The present study (Clinical Trial ID: NCT05791838) aimed to report a retrospective analysis of the management and outcomes of 86 consecutive BOTs patients, [...] Read more.
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) comprise 15–20% of primary ovarian neoplasms and represent an independent disease entity among epithelial ovarian cancers. The present study (Clinical Trial ID: NCT05791838) aimed to report a retrospective analysis of the management and outcomes of 86 consecutive BOTs patients, 54 of which were at a reproductive age. All patients with BOTs undergoing surgical treatment from January 2010 to December 2017 were included. Data were retrospectively reviewed. High levels of Ca-125 were observed in 25.6% of the FIGO stage I patients and 58.3% of the advanced disease patients. Fertility-sparing surgery and comprehensive surgical staging were performed in 36.7% and 49.3% of the patients, respectively. Laparotomy was the most frequent surgical approach (65.1%). The most common diagnosis at frozen sections was serous BOT (50.6%). Serous BOTs have significantly smaller tumor diameters than mucinous BOTs (p < 0.0001). The mean postoperative follow-up was 29.8 months (range 6–87 months). Three patients experienced a recurrence, with an overall recurrence rate of 3.5% (10% considering only the patients who underwent fertility-sparing treatment). BOTs have low recurrence rates, with excellent prognosis. Surgery with proper staging is the main treatment. Conservative surgery is a valid option for women with reproductive potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecological Cancer Diagnosis and Prevention)
14 pages, 708 KB  
Review
Update on Prognostic and Predictive Markers in Mucinous Ovarian Cancer
by Fulvio Borella, Marco Mitidieri, Stefano Cosma, Chiara Benedetto, Luca Bertero, Stefano Fucina, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Annalisa Carapezzi and Domenico Ferraioli
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1172; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041172 - 12 Feb 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4498
Abstract
This review includes state-of-the-art prognostic and predictive factors of mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC), a rare tumor. Clinical, pathological, and molecular features and treatment options according to prognosis are comprehensively discussed. Different clinical implications of MOC are described according to the The International Federation [...] Read more.
This review includes state-of-the-art prognostic and predictive factors of mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC), a rare tumor. Clinical, pathological, and molecular features and treatment options according to prognosis are comprehensively discussed. Different clinical implications of MOC are described according to the The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage: early MOC (stage I-II) and advanced MOC (stage III-IV). Early MOC is characterized by a good prognosis. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Fertility-sparing surgery could be performed in patients who wish to become pregnant and that present low recurrence risk of disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended, except in patients with high-risk clinical and pathological features. Regarding the histological features, an infiltrative growth pattern is the major prognostic factor of MOC. Furthermore, novel molecular biomarkers are emerging for tailored management of early-stage MOC. In contrast, advanced MOC is characterized by poor survival. Radical surgery is the cornerstone of treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended, although the efficacy is limited by the intrinsic chemoresistance of these tumors. Several molecular hallmarks of advanced MOC have been described in recent years (e.g., HER2 amplification, distinct methylation profiles, peculiar immunological microenvironment), but target therapy for these rare tumors is not available yet. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 286 KB  
Review
Lymph Node Involvement in Recurrent Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Current Evidence, Controversies, and a Review of the Literature
by Laureline Wetterwald, Apostolos Sarivalasis, Aikaterini Liapi, Patrice Mathevet and Chahin Achtari
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 890; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030890 - 31 Jan 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3678
Abstract
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) account for 10–20% of epithelial ovarian neoplasms. They are characterized by their lack of destructive stromal invasion. In comparison to invasive ovarian cancers, BOTs occur in younger patients and have better outcome. Serous borderline ovarian tumor (SBOT) represents the [...] Read more.
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) account for 10–20% of epithelial ovarian neoplasms. They are characterized by their lack of destructive stromal invasion. In comparison to invasive ovarian cancers, BOTs occur in younger patients and have better outcome. Serous borderline ovarian tumor (SBOT) represents the most common subtype of BOT. Complete surgical staging is the current standard management but fertility-sparing surgery is an option for SBOT patients who are at reproductive age. While most cases of SBOTs have an indolent course with favorable prognosis, late recurrence and malignant transformation can occur, usually in the form of low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Thus, assessment of the recurrence risk is essential for the management of those patients. SBOTs can be associated with lymph node involvement (LNI) in up to 30% of patients who undergo lymph node dissection at diagnosis, and whether LNI affects prognosis is controversial. The present review suggests that recurrent SBOTs with LNI have poorer oncological outcomes and highlights the biases due to the scarcity of reports in the literature. Preventing SBOTs from recurring and becoming invasive overtime and a more profound understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play are necessary. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rare Gynecological Cancers)
17 pages, 293 KB  
Review
Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: What Are the Implications for Women with Intact Endometrioma Planning for a Future Pregnancy? A Reproductive Clinical Outlook
by Johnny S. Younis
Biomolecules 2022, 12(11), 1721; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111721 - 21 Nov 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4405
Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic, universal, and prevalent disease estimated to affect up to 1:10 women of reproductive age. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) developing at reproductive age is challenging and of concern for women and practitioners alike. This outlook review focuses on the occurrence [...] Read more.
Endometriosis is a chronic, universal, and prevalent disease estimated to affect up to 1:10 women of reproductive age. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) developing at reproductive age is challenging and of concern for women and practitioners alike. This outlook review focuses on the occurrence of EAOC, especially in infertile women or those planning for a future pregnancy, from the perspective of a reproductive endocrinologist, based on recent evidence. Contemporary pathogenesis, genetic profiles, evidence of causality, clinical diagnosis, prognosis, and up-to-date management are discussed. EAOC seems to be merely associated with endometrioma and includes clear-cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Although endometrioma is frequently found in women of reproductive age (up to 1:18 of women), EAOC appears to be a rare occurrence. These women are of more advanced reproductive age, nulliparous, and hyperestrogenic, with a large-sized unilateral endometrioma (>9 cm) containing solid components and papillary projections. Each case suspected to have EAOC has specific characteristics, and a multidisciplinary discussion and appropriate patient counseling should be conducted to reach an optimal therapeutic plan. Since most of these cases are diagnosed at an early stage with a favorable prognosis, fertility-sparing surgery may be feasible. The pros and cons of fertility preservation techniques should be discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Cell Biology in Endometriosis and Endometrial Cancer)
10 pages, 1417 KB  
Article
Fertility Preserving Surgery Outcomes for Ovarian Malignancy: Data from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in Central London
by Jonathan Gaughran, Hannah Rosen O’Sullivan, Tom Lyne, Ahmed Abdelbar, Mostafa Abdalla and Ahmad Sayasneh
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(11), 3195; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113195 - 3 Jun 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2060
Abstract
Fertility Sparing Surgery (FSS) appears to be a safe means of treating early-stage ovarian cancer based on relatively limited evidence. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to aid women in counselling about their potential fertility outcomes. The aim of this study was to [...] Read more.
Fertility Sparing Surgery (FSS) appears to be a safe means of treating early-stage ovarian cancer based on relatively limited evidence. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to aid women in counselling about their potential fertility outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the reproductive outcomes and prognosis of women who have undergone FSS for ovarian malignancy. Between 1 June 2008 and 1 June 2018, a retrospective review of a clinical database was conducted to identify all consecutive patients who underwent FSS in a central London gynaecological oncology centre. All patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian malignancy (excluding borderline ovarian tumours) were eligible. All identified patients were then prospectively called into a follow up and asked to complete a questionnaire about their fertility outcomes. A total of 47 women underwent FSS; 36 were included in this study. The mean age was 30.3 years (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 27.6 to 33.0 years). During the study period, 17/36 (47.2%) of the women had attempted to conceive following surgery, with a successful live birth rate of 52.9% (9/17). The mean time of recurrence was 125.3 months (95% CI: 106.5–144.1 months). The mean time to death was 139.5 months (95% CI: 124.3–154.8). The cancer grade, tumour stage and use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) were the main factors significantly associated with the risk of recurrence and death. In conclusion, this study suggests that a large proportion of women will not attempt to conceive following FSS. For those who do attempt to conceive, the likelihood of achieving a live birth is high. However, careful counselling about the higher risk of recurrence and worse survival for women with high grade cancer, disease Stage > IA and potentially those who undergo ART is essential before contemplating FFS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 271 KB  
Article
Fertility Sparing Surgery and Borderline Ovarian Tumours
by Lorraine S. Kasaven, Mehar Chawla, Benjamin P. Jones, Maya Al-Memar, Nicolas Galazis, Yousra Ahmed-Salim, Mona El-Bahrawy, Stuart Lavery, Srdjan Saso and Joseph Yazbek
Cancers 2022, 14(6), 1485; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14061485 - 14 Mar 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3017
Abstract
To determine the oncological outcomes following fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for the management of Borderline Ovarian Tumours (BOTs). A retrospective analysis of participants diagnosed with BOTs between January 2004 and December 2020 at the West London Gynaecological Oncology Centre was conducted. A total of [...] Read more.
To determine the oncological outcomes following fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for the management of Borderline Ovarian Tumours (BOTs). A retrospective analysis of participants diagnosed with BOTs between January 2004 and December 2020 at the West London Gynaecological Oncology Centre was conducted. A total of 172 women were diagnosed; 52.3% (90/172) underwent FSS and 47.7% (82/172) non-FSS. The overall recurrence rate of disease was 16.9% (29/172), of which 79.3% (23/29) presented as the recurrence of serous or sero-mucinous BOTs and 20.7% (6/29) as low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). In the FSS group, the recurrence rate of BOTs was 25.6% (23/90) presenting a median 44.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 41.5) months, of which there were no episodes of recurrence presenting as LGSC reported. In the non-FSS group, all recurrences of disease presented as LGSC, with a rate of 7.7% (6/78), following a median of 47.5 months (IQR 47.8). A significant difference between the type of surgery performed (FSS v Non-FSS) and the association with recurrence of BOT was observed (Pearson Chi-Square: p = 0.000; x = 20.613). Twelve women underwent ultrasound-guided ovarian wedge resection (UGOWR) as a novel method of FSS. Recurrence of BOT was not significantly associated with the type of FSS performed (Pearson Chi- Square: x = 3.166, p = 0.379). Non-FSS is associated with negative oncological outcomes compared to FSS, as evidenced by the higher rate of recurrence of LGSC. This may be attributed to the indefinite long-term follow up with ultrasound surveillance all FSS women undergo, enabling earlier detection and treatment of recurrences. Full article
22 pages, 885 KB  
Review
Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer
by Geoffroy Canlorbe, Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet and Catherine Uzan
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4235; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184235 - 18 Sep 2021
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 6683
Abstract
(1) Background: although most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergo radical surgery, patients with early-stage disease, borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) or a non-epithelial tumor could be offered fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) depending on histologic subtypes and prognostic factors. (2) Methods: we conducted a [...] Read more.
(1) Background: although most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergo radical surgery, patients with early-stage disease, borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) or a non-epithelial tumor could be offered fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) depending on histologic subtypes and prognostic factors. (2) Methods: we conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and fertility outcomes of FSS in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We queried the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Cochrane (“Cochrane Reviews”) databases for articles published in English or French between 1985 and 15 January 2021. (3) Results: for patients with BOT, FSS should be offered to young women with a desire to conceive, even if peritoneal implants are discovered at the time of initial surgery. Women with mucinous BOT should undergo initial unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, whereas cystectomy is an acceptable option for women with serous BOT. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) can be initiated in patients with stage I BOT if infertility persists after surgery. For patients with EOC, FSS should only be considered after staging for women with stage IA grade 1 (and probably 2, or low-grade in the current classification) serous, mucinous or endometrioid tumors. FSS could also be offered to patients with stage IC grade 1 (or low-grade) disease. For women with serous, mucinous or endometrioid high-grade stage IA or low-grade stage IC1 or IC2 EOC, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and uterine conservation could be offered to allow pregnancy by egg donation. Finally, FSS has a large role to play in patients with non- epithelial ovarian cancer, and particularly women with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 2786 KB  
Case Report
Secondary Amenorrhea and Infertility Due to an Inhibin B Producing Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Ovary. A Rare Case Report and Literature Review
by Corina Gică, Ruxandra-Gabriela Cigăran, Radu Botezatu, Anca Maria Panaitescu, Brîndușa Cimpoca, Gheorghe Peltecu and Nicolae Gică
Medicina 2021, 57(8), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080829 - 17 Aug 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4775
Abstract
Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary (GCT) is a rare ovarian tumor with nonspecific symptoms. Studies reported that GCT are usually secreting estrogens and inhibins, especially inhibin B. It is considered that, in premenopausal women, irregular menses or secondary amenorrhea may be an [...] Read more.
Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary (GCT) is a rare ovarian tumor with nonspecific symptoms. Studies reported that GCT are usually secreting estrogens and inhibins, especially inhibin B. It is considered that, in premenopausal women, irregular menses or secondary amenorrhea may be an early symptom of GCT and, in postmenopausal women, the most common manifestation is vaginal bleeding. Additionally, endometrial abnormalities can be associated due to estrogenic secretion. At reproductive age, high levels of inhibin, lead to low levels of FSH and secondary amenorrhea causing infertility. At times, increased levels of LH in women with GCT are observed and the pathogenesis is still unclear. Therefore, inhibin B level can differentiate GCT from other causes of secondary amenorrhea. We report the case of a 26-year-old nulliparous, women who presented in our clinic with secondary infertility lasting longer than 2 years, secondary amenorrhea, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and suspicion of right ovarian endometrioma on CT scan. The ultrasound examination revealed that the right ovary was transformed in an anechoic mass with increased peripheral vascularity having a volume of 10 cm3. This patient had high serum levels of inhibin B and LH but normal levels of FSH and estradiol. The preliminary diagnosis of granulosa cell tumor of the ovary was made. After counseling, the informed consent for treatment was obtained and the patient agreed to undergo surgery. An uneventful laparoscopy was performed with right oophorectomy and multiple peritoneal sampling. The histological diagnosis confirmed adult GCT limited to right ovary, with negative peritoneal biopsies (FIGO IA). After surgery the patient recovered fully and had normal menstrual cycles with normal serum levels of hormones. Two months later she conceived spontaneously and had an uneventful pregnancy. In conclusion, for cases with secondary amenorrhea, the evaluation of inhibin B level is essential. Elevated inhibin B level may be a sign for the presence of an unsuspected tumor. With early diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis is generally good and the fertility may be preserved, especially in young patients with GCT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Risk Pregnancy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop