Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (258)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = personalized immunosuppression

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 359 KB  
Review
Antimicrobial Resistance in Immunocompromised Outpatients: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Challenges
by Farhood Sadeghi, Erta Rajabi, Zahra Ghanbari, Sajjad Fattahniya, Reza Samiee, Mandana Akhavan, Mohammadreza Salehi and Maryam Shafaati
Pharmacoepidemiology 2025, 4(4), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma4040021 - 3 Oct 2025
Abstract
Immunocompromised outpatients, including people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH), diabetes, cancer, and organ transplant recipients, are at high risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) due to their weakened immune systems and use of immunosuppressive therapies. The high prevalence of prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic use in [...] Read more.
Immunocompromised outpatients, including people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH), diabetes, cancer, and organ transplant recipients, are at high risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) due to their weakened immune systems and use of immunosuppressive therapies. The high prevalence of prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic use in this vulnerable population, coupled with frequent contact with healthcare facilities and limited outpatient antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems, contributes to the increase in antimicrobial resistance. The majority of available data pertains to inpatients, and there is a lack of comprehensive outpatient information on pathogen distribution, resistance patterns, and diagnostic challenges. Moreover, nonspecific clinical presentations, diminished inflammatory responses, and limitations of traditional diagnostic methods complicate infection diagnosis in this population. Increasing resistance surveillance, developing rapid diagnostic tools, and implementing accurate and personalized approaches are key strategies to reduce the burden of disease, mortality, and healthcare costs in the immunocompromised outpatient population. This study was designed as a narrative review based on a comprehensive search of major databases and guidelines. It aims to examine the available evidence and address the challenges associated with AMR in immunocompromised outpatients. Full article
15 pages, 434 KB  
Review
Dendritic Cell Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors: Advances in Translational Research and Clinical Application
by Mi Eun Kim and Jun Sik Lee
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(10), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47100806 - 1 Oct 2025
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) are critical antigen-presenting cells that orchestrate the interface between innate and adaptive immunity, making them attractive approaches for cancer immunotherapy. Recent advances in the characterization of DC subsets, antigen delivery strategies, and adjuvant design have enabled the enhancement of DC-based [...] Read more.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are critical antigen-presenting cells that orchestrate the interface between innate and adaptive immunity, making them attractive approaches for cancer immunotherapy. Recent advances in the characterization of DC subsets, antigen delivery strategies, and adjuvant design have enabled the enhancement of DC-based vaccines for solid tumors. Clinical studies across melanoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer have demonstrated safety and immunogenicity, with encouraging signals of clinical efficacy, particularly when DC vaccination is combined with immune checkpoint blockade or personalized neoantigen approaches. However, translational barriers remain, including the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, inefficient DC migration, and variability in manufacturing protocols. Developing solutions such as in vivo DC targeting, biomaterials-based delivery systems, high-resolution single-cell analyses, and artificial intelligence-driven epitope prediction are controlled to overcome these challenges. Together, these innovations highlight the evolving role of DC immunotherapy as a foundation of precision oncology, offering the potential to integrate personalized vaccination strategies into standard treatment paradigms for solid tumors. Therefore, in this review, we specifically focus on these advances in dendritic cell immunotherapy for solid tumors and their translational implications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Challenges of Targeted Therapy of Cancers: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 283 KB  
Review
Immune Dysregulation in Sepsis. A Narrative Review for the Clinicians
by Asimina Valsamaki, Vasileios Vazgiourakis, Konstantinos Mantzarlis, Efstratios Manoulakas and Demosthenes Makris
Biomedicines 2025, 13(10), 2386; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13102386 - 29 Sep 2025
Abstract
Immune dysregulation presents a significant clinical challenge due to its rapid progression and complex interplay between hyperinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. Different responses from the innate and adaptive immune systems can result in diseases such as immunoparalysis, cytokine storms, and secondary infections. Current diagnostic [...] Read more.
Immune dysregulation presents a significant clinical challenge due to its rapid progression and complex interplay between hyperinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. Different responses from the innate and adaptive immune systems can result in diseases such as immunoparalysis, cytokine storms, and secondary infections. Current diagnostic methods remain non-specific and time-consuming, delaying targeted interventions. A compartmentalized approach to immune monitoring, distinguishing innate and acquired immune response functional differentiation, is essential for distinguishing between hyperactivation and suppression. Key biomarkers, including cytokines, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), and CD4/CD8 counts, as well as Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PDL-1) and V-type immunoglobulin domain-containing suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) regulators, can guide personalized treatment strategies. Although they need more clinical validation, novel therapeutic methods such as cytokine inhibitors, immunological stimulants, and immunomodulators have demonstrated promise. Early diagnosis and precision medicine developments could lead to better patient outcomes. Advances in non-coding RNAs have led to specific diagnostic panels based on microRNA (MiRNA) levels. A deeper understanding of immune imbalance in sepsis is critical for optimizing treatment and reducing mortality rates. This review highlights emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to address the multifaceted nature of sepsis-related immune dysregulation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology and Immunotherapy)
12 pages, 633 KB  
Article
Increased Susceptibility to Salmonella Infection in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Compared with Other Systemic Autoimmune Diseases: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study from the Largest Health Care System in Taiwan
by Chen-Ying Wei, Han-Hua Yu, Pei-Yi Cheng and Yen-Fu Chen
Life 2025, 15(10), 1522; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101522 - 26 Sep 2025
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) require long-term immunosuppressive therapy, placing patients at increased risk of infection. Salmonella species are particularly concerning due to their invasiveness and potential link to autoimmune activation, notably in SLE. This study aimed [...] Read more.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) require long-term immunosuppressive therapy, placing patients at increased risk of infection. Salmonella species are particularly concerning due to their invasiveness and potential link to autoimmune activation, notably in SLE. This study aimed to compare the risk of culture-confirmed Salmonella infection between SLE and other SARDs, based on data from the Chang Gung Research Database between 2005 and 2020. After propensity score matching, 3537 patients per group were analyzed. Patients with SLE had a higher incidence of Salmonella infection compared with those with other SARDs (0.54 vs. 0.17 per 1000 person-years), with a significantly greater cumulative incidence (log-rank p < 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for Salmonella infection in SLE was 2.47 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–6.38), and the competing risk model confirmed a significant association (sub-distribution HR 2.58, 95% CI: 1.06–6.29, p = 0.04). Among SLE patients, lymphopenia was the only independent predictor of Salmonella infection (adjusted HR 3.98, 95% CI: 1.83–8.68, p < 0.001). Bloodstream infections were most common (70%), and serogroup D was the predominant strain (80%). These results suggest patients with SLE face higher Salmonella risk than other SARDs, especially those with lymphopenia, underscoring the need for targeted surveillance and preventive strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physiology and Pathology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 457 KB  
Article
General Practitioners and Gut Microbiota: Surveying Knowledge and Awareness in Italy
by Cesare Tosetti, Alessandra Belvedere, Massimo Berardino, Luciano Bertolusso, Rosanna Cantarini, Francesco Carofiglio, Floriana Di Bella, Daniele Franchi, Andrea Furnari, Alessandro Marturano, Tecla Mastronuzzi, Roberto Barone, Giuseppe Disclafani, Silvia Dubini, Marco Prastaro, Riccardo Scoglio, Alessandro Rossi and Ignazio Grattagliano
Gastrointest. Disord. 2025, 7(4), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord7040060 - 25 Sep 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The role of the intestinal microbiota in gastroenterological diseases has gained increasing relevance in general medicine. The study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and awareness of Italian general practitioners regarding gut microbiota, as well as the clinical applications of probiotics and prebiotics. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The role of the intestinal microbiota in gastroenterological diseases has gained increasing relevance in general medicine. The study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and awareness of Italian general practitioners regarding gut microbiota, as well as the clinical applications of probiotics and prebiotics. Methods: The survey research involved 457 Italian general practitioners, who anonymously filled an online structured questionnaire. Results: Most respondents identified antibiotics, diet, gastrointestinal infections, and stress as factors that can modulate the gut microbiota, while a smaller proportion recognized the role of physical activity. A comparable number acknowledged the influence of obesity, smoking, and immunosuppressant drugs. Although most participants correctly defined probiotics, the concept of prebiotics was less widely understood. Probiotics were primarily prescribed for irritable bowel syndrome, suspected dysbiosis, or during antibiotic therapy, and only a portion of physicians reported routinely combining them with prebiotics. The selection of probiotic strains was mainly based on personal experience, while fecal microbiota analysis was seldom used in clinical practice. Conclusions: These findings provide an updated snapshot of current knowledge and practices regarding the microbiota in Italian general medicine and highlight critical gaps, particularly in the understanding of prebiotics and less recognized modulatory factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Gastrointestinal Disorders in 2025–2026)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1587 KB  
Review
Unraveling Resistance in Lung Cancer Immunotherapy: Clinical Milestones, Mechanistic Insights, and Future Strategies
by Maria Vitale, Raffaella Pagliaro, Giuseppe Viscardi, Lucio Pastore, Giuseppe Castaldo, Fabio Perrotta, Susan F. Campbell, Andrea Bianco and Filippo Scialò
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(18), 9244; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26189244 - 22 Sep 2025
Viewed by 275
Abstract
Over the last decade, immunotherapy has revolutionized lung cancer treatments, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have achieved significant clinical success. However, high percentages of patients do not respond initially or eventually develop a resistance to these therapies. This [...] Read more.
Over the last decade, immunotherapy has revolutionized lung cancer treatments, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have achieved significant clinical success. However, high percentages of patients do not respond initially or eventually develop a resistance to these therapies. This review explores the evolution and challenges of immunotherapy in lung cancer, highlighting its clinical milestones and intrinsic and extrinsic resistance mechanisms. We investigate tumor-intrinsic resistance factors, including alterations in antigen presentation, the loss of Beta-2 microglobulin function, impaired interferon signaling, immune editing, epigenetic modifications, and tumor-extrinsic resistance, such as an immunosuppressive lung tumor microenvironment, dysregulated cytokine profiles, and the upregulation of immune checkpoints. Then, we focus on the emerging role of resistance biomarkers and the development of personalized treatment strategies to overcome these challenges. The complex interplay between tumor biology and immune modulation in lung cancer paves the way for novel approaches for improving the effectiveness of immunotherapeutic treatments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 728 KB  
Review
Immune Landscape of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Evasion and Therapeutic Insights
by Nunzia Porro, Elena Spínola-Lasso, Fabio Marra and Alessandra Gentilini
Immuno 2025, 5(3), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno5030040 - 17 Sep 2025
Viewed by 284
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a highly aggressive and heterogeneous malignancy characterized by marked resistance to standard chemotherapy and poor prognosis. While the advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of several solid tumors, including melanoma, breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer, its [...] Read more.
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a highly aggressive and heterogeneous malignancy characterized by marked resistance to standard chemotherapy and poor prognosis. While the advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of several solid tumors, including melanoma, breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer, its efficacy in iCCA remains limited. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy for iCCA, leading to its approval as a first-line treatment. However, overall response rates remain low, largely due to its immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). The immune-cold nature of iCCA is typified by a dominant presence of immunosuppressive cell populations, including M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and T regulatory cells. In addition, traditional biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability have shown limited predictive value in iCCA, highlighting the need for novel biomarkers and immunotherapeutic strategies. Emerging approaches aimed at reprogramming the TIME, including combination therapies targeting suppressive cells, stromal remodeling, and novel immune effectors like CAR-T and cancer vaccines, hold significant promise for enhancing therapeutic efficacy. This review summarizes the distinct features of iCCA TIME, key mechanisms of immune evasion, current challenges, and future directions to overcome immune resistance, with the aim of developing personalized immunotherapies to improve patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights of Anti-cancer Immunity and Cancer Immune Evasion)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 632 KB  
Review
Monoclonal Antibodies and Small-Molecule Therapies for Lichen Planus: Targeted Immunomodulation and Emerging Evidence
by Francois Rosset, Nadia Sciamarrelli, Luca Mastorino, Valentina Pala, Sara Boskovic, Eleonora Bongiovanni, Orsola Crespi, Yingying Liao, Simone Ribero and Pietro Quaglino
Antibodies 2025, 14(3), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib14030079 - 17 Sep 2025
Viewed by 354
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of autoimmune origin, affecting the skin and mucous membranes. While corticosteroids and immunosuppressants are traditionally used, many cases remain refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Recent advances in immunopathogenesis have led to the exploration [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of autoimmune origin, affecting the skin and mucous membranes. While corticosteroids and immunosuppressants are traditionally used, many cases remain refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Recent advances in immunopathogenesis have led to the exploration of targeted therapies, including biologic agents and small-molecule inhibitors. Methods: This review synthesizes current evidence from case reports, case series, and observational studies on the use of monoclonal antibodies (anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-17, anti-IL-23, anti-IL-6) and JAK inhibitors in LP. A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on studies published between 2010 and 2025. Data on mechanisms, clinical efficacy, safety, and research limitations were extracted and summarized. Results: Promising therapeutic responses were reported for IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab) and JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib) in mucosal and recalcitrant LP. Anti-TNF agents showed variable efficacy, while emerging targets such as BTK and IFN-γ are under investigation. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, but long-term safety data are lacking. The absence of randomized controlled trials and standardized outcome measures limits generalizability. Conclusions: Biologic and small-molecule therapies represent a potential paradigm shift in the treatment of LP, offering targeted immunomodulation with promising efficacy in refractory cases. Further collaborative research, including randomized studies and biomarker-driven approaches, is urgently needed to validate these treatments and establish personalized care strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antibody-Based Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 891 KB  
Review
Advances in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cellular Immunotherapy: A Progress in Dendritic Cell, T-Cell, and NK Cell Vaccines
by Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Mohammad Aslam, Asma Ayaz, Muhammad Saeed Akhtar and Wajid Zaman
Cells 2025, 14(18), 1453; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14181453 - 16 Sep 2025
Viewed by 453
Abstract
Over the past decade, cellular immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with dendritic-cell (DC) vaccines, T-cell vaccines, and natural killer (NK)-cell therapies demonstrating distinct mechanisms and clinical potential. DC vaccines capitalize on antigen presentation to prime [...] Read more.
Over the past decade, cellular immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with dendritic-cell (DC) vaccines, T-cell vaccines, and natural killer (NK)-cell therapies demonstrating distinct mechanisms and clinical potential. DC vaccines capitalize on antigen presentation to prime tumor-specific T-cell responses, showing excellent safety profiles limited mainly to injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. While monotherapy has shown limited efficacy, combinations with checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy enhance immune activation and survival outcomes. Recent innovations, including neoantigen-loaded, mRNA-electroporated, and exosome-pulsed DCs, demonstrate improved immunogenicity and personalized approaches. T-cell vaccines, designed to activate cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell responses, have been tested across multiple platforms, including peptide-based (MAGE-A3), viral vector (TG4010/MUC1), and mRNA (CV9201/92) formulations. While the phase III MAGRIT trial presented no disease-free survival (DFS) benefit with adjuvant MAGE-A3 vaccination, the TG4010 vaccine improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.66) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.67) in MUC1-positive NSCLC when combined with chemotherapy. Current strategies focus on personalized neoantigen vaccines and KRAS-targeted approaches (e.g., ELI-002), with ongoing phase III trials evaluating their potential in resectable NSCLC. NK-cell therapies have also shown promise, with early trials establishing the feasibility of autologous and allogeneic infusions, while engineered CAR-NK cells enhance tumor-specific targeting. Combination strategies with checkpoint inhibitors significantly improve response rates and PFS, revealing synergies between innate and adaptive immunity. Recent advances include cytokine-enhanced, memory-like NK cells to overcome immunosuppression and “off-the-shelf” products for broader clinical use. Together, these cellular immunotherapies represent a versatile and evolving frontier in NSCLC treatment, with ongoing research optimizing combinations, delivery platforms, and patient selection to maximize therapeutic benefit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Microenvironment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 507 KB  
Perspective
Predictive Role of MicroRNAs in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Clinician’s View
by Christian Prinz and Leonard Fehring
Cells 2025, 14(18), 1435; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14181435 - 13 Sep 2025
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Crohn’s disease (CD), also known as terminal ileitis, has been the focus of gastroenterological diagnostics and therapy for decades. Although significant therapeutic progress has been made in recent years, largely due to an improved understanding of the pathophysiology and evolving treatment strategies for [...] Read more.
Crohn’s disease (CD), also known as terminal ileitis, has been the focus of gastroenterological diagnostics and therapy for decades. Although significant therapeutic progress has been made in recent years, largely due to an improved understanding of the pathophysiology and evolving treatment strategies for Crohn’s disease, many new antibody-based therapies demonstrate clinical response rates of only 30–50%. Predictive biomarkers for differential therapeutic responses may therefore be critical for personalized treatment selection, but such markers have not yet been clinically validated for the majority of patients treated with prednisone or monoclonal antibodies targeting integrin pathways, TNF-α, or IL-23. In this review, the diagnostic potential of microRNA (miRNA) dysregulation in patients with Crohn’s disease is explored, emphasizing the potential utility of specific miRNA expression profiles in guiding targeted therapy. Notably, reduced expression of miR-29 is associated with planned treatment using ustekinumab (an IL-23 signaling inhibitor), elevated miR-23a levels in inflamed tissue may inform the use of TNF-α inhibitors, increased miR-155 expression is relevant for patients considered for JAK inhibitor therapy, and altered levels of miR-126 and miR-486 may support the selection of vedolizumab. Assessment of these dysregulated miRNAs—such as through comparative profiling in inflamed versus non-inflamed tissue from the same patients—could serve as a predictive biomarker panel to optimize individualized immunosuppressive treatment strategies in Crohn’s disease. We also examine the role of microRNAs in regulating TRP channels and their involvement in the mechanisms of action of selected complementary medicines. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

42 pages, 1383 KB  
Review
Assessing Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety
by Kyriakos Goulas, Martin Müller and Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(18), 8859; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188859 - 11 Sep 2025
Viewed by 404
Abstract
This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy and safety of monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal (pAb) antibody therapies in adult sepsis and septic shock by synthesizing data from 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing over 10,000 patients. Sepsis and septic shock continue to be [...] Read more.
This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy and safety of monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal (pAb) antibody therapies in adult sepsis and septic shock by synthesizing data from 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing over 10,000 patients. Sepsis and septic shock continue to be major critical-care mortality causes worldwide because of simultaneous hyperinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. The clinical results from using targeted antibody therapies to manage this dysregulated response have shown inconsistent results. We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (through February 2025) to identify RCTs that compared mAb and pAb treatments to placebo or standard care in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Monoclonal antibodies against single cytokines e.g., Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and endotoxin, did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality in unselected cohorts, though subgroup analyses of patients with elevated Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or early septic shock showed trends toward benefit. Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) enriched for Immunoglobulin M (IgM) demonstrated the most consistent mortality reduction when administered early in hyperinflammatory phases. Emerging precision strategies—including checkpoint inhibitors targeting Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 inhibitors (anti–PD-1/PD-L1), complement component 5a inhibitors (anti–C5a), and anti–adrenomedullin—were safe and improved organ-support-free days and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. According to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, evidence showed moderate confidence for mortality, high certainty for safety and low to moderate certainty for secondary outcomes. The use of broad single-target monoclonal treatments has failed to deliver significant improvements in sepsis patient outcomes. The most promising approaches for sepsis treatment involve biomarker-guided precision strategies and polyclonal IgM-enriched IVIG. Future sepsis trials need to implement rapid immune profiling and adaptive designs and combination regimens to achieve optimal efficacy and establish personalized guideline-based sepsis management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Endothelial Cell Injury and Repair)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 920 KB  
Review
A Comprehensive Review of Digestive Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Bacterial Pathogens, Host Susceptibility, and the Impact of Viral Hepatitis
by Deniz Günșahin, Vasile Șandru, Gabriel Constantinescu, Mădălina Ilie, Teodor Cabel, Ramona Ștefania Popescu, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Victor Daniel Miron, Gheorghe G. Balan, Diana Cotigă, Bogdan Miutescu, Gülşen Özkaya Şahin and Oana Săndulescu
Microorganisms 2025, 13(9), 2128; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092128 - 11 Sep 2025
Viewed by 521
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) interventional endoscopy has evolved into a cornerstone of modern gastroenterology, offering minimally invasive solutions for complex conditions. However, these procedures are not without risk, particularly with respect to post-procedural infections. While rare, such infections can have significant clinical consequences and are [...] Read more.
Gastrointestinal (GI) interventional endoscopy has evolved into a cornerstone of modern gastroenterology, offering minimally invasive solutions for complex conditions. However, these procedures are not without risk, particularly with respect to post-procedural infections. While rare, such infections can have significant clinical consequences and are increasingly recognized as a public health concern. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of infections associated with GI endoscopy, focusing on transmission mechanisms, microbial agents involved, host susceptibility, preventive strategies, and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Infections following GI endoscopy remain infrequent but clinically significant, particularly in high-risk procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound. Duodenoscopes represent a major vector for exogenous infection, often involving multidrug-resistant bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus spp. Host-related factors increase the risk of infection. Risk factors associated with post-endoscopic infections include advanced age, male sex, non-white ethnicity, immunosuppression, presence of cholangiocarcinoma, autoimmune diseases, liver cirrhosis of viral and/or alcoholic etiology, chronic kidney disease, high-risk cardiac conditions, or chemotherapy. New reprocessing methods, such as ethylene oxide gas sterilization, automated endoscope reprocessors, and selective use of single-use endoscopes and duodenoscopes, may contribute to lowering infection rates. Greater awareness of infection risks, improved infection control practices, and adherence to updated guidelines are crucial for enhancing patient safety in digestive endoscopy. Multidisciplinary strategies, including surveillance, device innovation, and personalized risk assessment, are needed to address this evolving challenge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Microbiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1088 KB  
Review
Immunological Targets in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Where Are We Going Now?
by Elena Rossini, Luca Leonardi, Stefania Morino, Giovanni Antonini and Laura Fionda
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(9), 978; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090978 - 11 Sep 2025
Viewed by 700
Abstract
Background: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder marked by antibody-mediated disruption of neuromuscular transmission. Despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and biologics, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating more targeted and personalized treatment strategies. Objective: This review aims to synthesize [...] Read more.
Background: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder marked by antibody-mediated disruption of neuromuscular transmission. Despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and biologics, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating more targeted and personalized treatment strategies. Objective: This review aims to synthesize current knowledge of the immunopathological mechanisms across gMG subtypes and to explore emerging therapeutic targets tailored to these diverse disease phenotypes. Methods: A narrative review was conducted, integrating recent findings from clinical trials, immunogenetic studies, and preclinical research to describe subtype-specific immune mechanisms and corresponding therapeutic innovations. Results: gMG subtypes—characterized by autoantibody profiles (AChR, MuSK, LRP4, or seronegative), thymic histopathology, and age of onset—demonstrate distinct immunological pathways. Early-onset MG is associated with thymic hyperplasia and Th17-driven inflammation; thymoma-associated MG involves central tolerance breakdown; late-onset MG shows immune senescence and altered T-cell regulation. MuSK- and LRP4-positive MG exhibit unique cytokine and antibody signatures. Novel therapeutic strategies include B cell- and T cell-targeted therapies (e.g., anti-CD19, anti-CD38, JAK inhibitors), cytokine inhibitors (IL-6, IL-17, IL-23), FcRn antagonists, complement inhibitors, and gene- or cell-based therapies such as CAR-T and CAAR-T cells. Conclusion: The evolving landscape of gMG treatment reflects a shift toward immunopathology-based precision medicine. Better characterization of subtype-specific molecular signatures and immune dysfunctions is essential to guide clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for treatment-refractory patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Neuromuscular Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 374 KB  
Article
Vaccination Coverage in Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Impact of a Tailored Vaccination Pathway Including COVID-19 and Herpes Zoster in a University Hospital Vaccination Center
by Roberto Venuto, Caterina Elisabetta Rizzo, Daniela Lo Giudice, Walter Fries, Concetta Ceccio, Francesco Fedele, Raffaele Squeri and Cristina Genovese
Vaccines 2025, 13(9), 961; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090961 - 11 Sep 2025
Viewed by 343
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of severe infections, particularly when undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. Vaccination is a key preventive strategy, but coverage in this group is often suboptimal. This study evaluated vaccination coverage among IBD patients at diagnosis/referral [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of severe infections, particularly when undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. Vaccination is a key preventive strategy, but coverage in this group is often suboptimal. This study evaluated vaccination coverage among IBD patients at diagnosis/referral and after admission to a structured hospital-based vaccination pathway. Methods: We conducted an observational study (February 2022–February 2025) at the Vaccination Center (VC) of the University Hospital “G. Martino” in Messina, Italy. Adult IBD patients referred by gastroenterologists were assessed for vaccination status using hospital and regional registries, and personalized schedules were developed based on Italian National Vaccine Prevention Plan guidelines. Descriptive statistics were applied to assess baseline and post-intervention vaccination coverage. Results: Of 154 participants (mean age 64 years; 51.9% male), 55.4% were on immunosuppressive therapy. Baseline coverage was heterogeneous: influenza, 6.5%; PCV13, 25.5%; PPV23, 26.6%; herpes zoster, 62.3%; and COVID-19 primary cycle, 79.6%. After enrollment, substantial improvements were observed: influenza, 89.2%; PCV13, 74.5%; PPV23, 67.0%; herpes zoster, 75.4%; and COVID-19 primary cycle, 96.8%. Coverage for catch-up vaccines also improved (e.g., HBV went from 1.9% to 44.2%). However, uptake of COVID-19 booster doses during the study period remained low (15.6%). No significant differences emerged by sex or treatment subgroup. Conclusions: A structured, collaborative care pathway between gastroenterologists and public health specialists significantly improved vaccination coverage among IBD patients. Despite gains, gaps persist in COVID-19 booster uptake and catch-up vaccinations. Integration of vaccination services into routine IBD management is essential to enhance protection in this high-risk population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology of Diseases Preventable by Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 466 KB  
Review
Neoantigen-Driven Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Emerging Strategies and Clinical Potential
by Peter A. Shatalov, Anna A. Bukaeva, Egor M. Veselovsky, Alexey A. Traspov, Daria V. Bagdasarova, Irina A. Leukhina, Anna P. Shinkarkina, Maria P. Raygorodskaya, Alena V. Murzaeva, Yulia A. Mechenici, Maria A. Revkova, Andrey D. Kaprin and Peter V. Shegai
Biomedicines 2025, 13(9), 2213; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092213 - 9 Sep 2025
Viewed by 689
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer (BC), comprising approximately 20% of newly diagnosed BC cases. The poor prognosis, high recurrence rates, and inefficacy of hormone-based therapies make TNBC one of the greatest challenges in contemporary [...] Read more.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer (BC), comprising approximately 20% of newly diagnosed BC cases. The poor prognosis, high recurrence rates, and inefficacy of hormone-based therapies make TNBC one of the greatest challenges in contemporary oncology. The unique immunological features of TNBC, including relatively high tumor mutational burden, abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and elevated PD-L1 expression, offer a wide range of opportunities for immunotherapeutic approaches, of which the most progressive and promising are neoantigen-driven ones. This review examines the current landscape of neoantigen-based therapeutic approaches in TNBC treatment, spanning from discovery methodologies to clinical applications. We provide a critical analysis of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in TNBC, highlighting the balance between its immunoactivating (CD8+ T-cells, dendritic cells) and immunosuppressive (regulatory T-cells, M2 macrophages) components as the key determinant of therapeutic success, as well as reviewing the emerging approaches to TME reprogramming and recruiting in favor of better outcomes. We also present state-of the-art methods in neoantigen identification and prioritization, covering the landscape of technological platforms and prediction algorithms, addressing the existing accuracy limitations along with emerging computational solutions, and comprehensively discussing the TNBC neoantigen spectrum. Our analysis shows the strong domination of patient-specific (“private”) neoantigens over shared variants in the TNBC, with TP53 as the only gene with recurrent variants. Finally, we extensively cover neoantigen-recruiting therapeutic modalities including adoptive cell therapies, personalized vaccine platforms (peptide-based, mRNA/DNA vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines), and oncolytic viruses-based approaches. Our study of current clinical trials demonstrates the substantial gap between early proof-of-concept experiments and further applicability of neoantigen-driven therapies. The major challenges hampering the success of such methods include neoantigen prediction inaccuracy rates, high manufacturing costs, and time consumption. Promising ways to overcome these difficulties include the development of combinational strategies, TME modeling and modifying, and improvement of the therapy delivery properties, along with the optimization of production workflows and cost-effectiveness of vaccine development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Breast Cancer)
Back to TopTop