Search Results (3)

In view of the application status and technical challenges of steel–wood composite joints in architecture, this paper proposes an innovative connection technology to solve issues such as susceptibility to pry-out at beam–column joints and low load-bearing capacity and to provide various reinforcement methods in order to meet the different structural requirements and economic benefits. By designing and manufacturing four groups of beam–column joint specimens with different reinforcement methods, including no reinforcement, structural adhesive and angle steel reinforcement, 4 mm thick steel sleeve reinforcement, and 6 mm thick steel sleeve reinforcement, monotonic loading tests and finite element simulations were carried out, respectively. This research found that unreinforced specimens and structural adhesive angle steel-reinforced joints exhibited obvious mortise and tenon compression deformation and, moreover, tenon pulling phenomena at load values of approximately 2 kN and 2.6 kN, respectively. However, the joint reinforced by a steel sleeve showed a significant improvement in the tenon pulling phenomenon and demonstrated excellent initial stiffness characteristics. The failure mode of the steel sleeve-reinforced joints is primarily characterized by the propagation of cracks at the edges of the steel plate and the tearing of the wood, but the overall structure remains intact. The initial rotational stiffness of the joints reinforced with angle steel and self-tapping screws, the joints reinforced with 4 mm thick steel sleeves, and the joints reinforced with 6 mm thick steel sleeves are 3.96, 6.99, and 13.62 times that of the pure wooden joints, while the ultimate bending moments are 1.97, 7.11, and 7.39 times, respectively. Using finite element software to simulate four groups of joints to observe their stress changes, the areas with high stress in the joints without sleeve reinforcement are mainly located at the upper and lower ends of the tenon, where the compressive stress at the upper edge of the tenon and the tensile stress at the lower flange are both distributed along the grain direction of the beam. The stress on the column sleeve of the joints reinforced with steel sleeves and bolts is relatively low, while the areas with high strain in the beam sleeve are mainly concentrated on the side with the welded stiffeners and its surroundings; the strain around the bolt holes is also quite noticeable. Full article

This paper presents an experimental study conducted on the behavior of drop-in anchors in uncracked concrete slabs. Both seismic (cyclic) load tests and static load tests to collapse are performed on drop-in anchors subjected to tension or shear forces. Three different anchor sizes are subjected to seismic qualification testing, followed by a static load test to collapse. The test results confirm the capability of the tested anchors to sustain simulated pulsating seismic tension and shear loading with frequency ranges between 0.1 and 2.0 Hz. It was observed that no tension failure occurred at the end of the cyclic load tests for all the tested anchors, and their residual inelastic maximum displacement at the end of the cyclic tension test was relatively small. Moreover, the experimental results show that the anchors’ ultimate capacities are higher than those specified by the anchor manufacturer. Finally, the anchors’ experimental pullout shear capacities are compared with the failure prediction equations in the literature and design codes. It is found that the theoretical models provide a conservative prediction of the concrete breakout of anchors in tension compared to the experimental ultimate loads. The coefficient for pry-out strength (k_cp) equal to 2 or slightly smaller than 2 is likely to predict a better pry-out capacity with the experimental results compared to the application of the high conservative value of k_cp equal to 1, as given in the code. Full article

Current formulas to assess the shear capacity of headed steel stud anchors and post-installed (PI) anchors in case of pryout failure (sometimes known as pull-rear failure) have been derived either based on the indirect-tension resistance model or are fully empirical based on push-out test results. In both cases, the predicted pryout capacity is clearly conservative and underestimates the true pryout capacity of anchorages, especially for stiff anchors with low embedment-to-diameter ratios (h_ef/d < 4.5). This paper proposes an empirical and a semi-empirical formula to predict the concrete pryout capacity of headed steel studs and PI anchors. They were derived based on an improved indirect-tension model which accounts for the stud diameter and the stud spacing in a group of anchors. Furthermore, a database of 214 monotonic shear tests from the literature, including own tests (push-off and horizontally shear tests), is reevaluated and compared to the provisions of EN1992-4. The scope of this assessment proposal includes single and group of headed steel studs and PI anchors attached to a stiff steel plate as well as shear connectors in composite structures without metal deck embedded in normal-weight concrete. Full article