Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (18)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 2014 KB  
Systematic Review
Interventional Procedures in Deep Venous Thrombosis Treatment: A Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Patient Selection
by Arkadiusz Kacała, Mateusz Dorochowicz, Jędrzej Fischer, Adrian Korbecki, Aleksander Truszyński, Anna Madura, Krzysztof Dyś, Andrzej Szuba and Maciej Guziński
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1476; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081476 - 18 Aug 2025
Viewed by 684
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with pulmonary embolism and long-term complications such as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation prevents thrombus extension but does not actively remove clot. Interventional techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, have [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with pulmonary embolism and long-term complications such as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation prevents thrombus extension but does not actively remove clot. Interventional techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, have been introduced to restore venous patency and reduce complications. This systematic review summarizes current evidence on outcomes, safety, and patient selection for these procedures. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and February 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies with ≥20 patients. Extracted outcomes were technical success, thrombus clearance, venous patency, PTS, quality of life, and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and AMSTAR-2. Results: Of 456 records screened, 35 studies were included. Randomized trials (CaVenT, ATTRACT, CAVA) showed that catheter-directed and pharmacomechanical approaches improved venous patency and reduced moderate-to-severe PTS in selected patients with iliofemoral DVT, though overall benefit was variable. Mechanical thrombectomy devices (e.g., AngioJet, ClotTriever, FlowTriever) achieved high thrombus clearance and shorter procedural times, with device-specific complication profiles. Observational data demonstrated venous stenting patency rates of 74–89% at 12 months. Study heterogeneity limited direct comparisons. Conclusions: Interventional procedures can reduce PTS and improve outcomes in carefully selected patients, particularly those with acute iliofemoral DVT. Modern mechanical and pharmacomechanical techniques enhance efficiency and safety, while venous stenting addresses underlying obstructions. Further high-quality trials with long-term follow-up are needed to define optimal patient selection and comparative effectiveness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Venous Thromboembolism Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1633 KB  
Case Report
Case Report of Successful Extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) in Refractory Cardiac Arrest Caused by Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism with Remarkable Recovery
by Lukas Harbaum, Klevis Mihali, Felix Ausbüttel, Bernhard Schieffer and Julian Kreutz
Reports 2025, 8(3), 100; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8030100 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 468
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Fulminant pulmonary embolism (PE) leading to an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with a high mortality rate and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) frequently failing to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) has emerged as a [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Fulminant pulmonary embolism (PE) leading to an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with a high mortality rate and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) frequently failing to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) has emerged as a potential life-saving intervention. Case Presentation: A 66-year-old woman suffered an OHCA due to massive PE, presenting with pulseless electrical activity (PEA). After 90 min of pre- and in-hospital CPR without sustained ROSC, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) was initiated as eCPR upon arrival at the hospital. Even after implantation of the va-ECMO, there was initially a pronounced acidosis (pH 6.9) with a high elevated lactate level (>30 mmol/L); these factors, together with the prolonged low-flow period, indicated a poor prognosis. Further diagnostic tests revealed intracranial hemorrhage (subdural hematoma), and systemic lysis was not possible. With persistent right heart failure, surgical thrombectomy was performed during hospitalization. Intensive multidisciplinary management finally led to successful therapy and weaning from mechanical ventilation, as well as to complete neurological recovery (CPC-Score 1-2). Conclusions: This case illustrates that eCPR can facilitate survival with good favorable neurological outcomes despite initially poor prognostic predictors. It underscores the importance of refining patient selection criteria and optimizing management strategies for eCPR in refractory cardiac arrest secondary to PE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Critical Care/Emergency Medicine/Pulmonary)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3650 KB  
Systematic Review
Catheter-Based Therapies in Acute Pulmonary Embolism—Mortality and Safety Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Panagiotis Zoumpourlis, Shaunak Mangeshkar, Kuan-Yu Chi, Dimitrios Varrias, Michail Spanos, Muhammad Fahimuddin, Matthew D. Langston, Usman A. Khan, Michael J. Grushko, Prabhjot Singh and Seth I. Sokol
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4167; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124167 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 721
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and circulatory collapse are considered to play a major role in mortality in patients suffering from pulmonary embolism (PE). Catheter-based therapies (CBTs) have been shown to improve RV hemodynamics. The aim of this study was to present available [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and circulatory collapse are considered to play a major role in mortality in patients suffering from pulmonary embolism (PE). Catheter-based therapies (CBTs) have been shown to improve RV hemodynamics. The aim of this study was to present available data for CBTs in acute PE and investigate whether CBTs offer mortality benefit and better safety outcomes over anticoagulation (AC) in patients with intermediate-risk PE. Methods: PubMed was searched from inception until February 2024 for studies that investigated treatment strategies in patients with confirmed PE. We initially investigated the crude incidence of mortality and major bleeding for individual interventions in patients with either intermediate or high-risk PE. We then directly compared CBT to AC for intermediate-risk PE, for which the effectiveness endpoint was comparative short-term (30-day or in-hospital) and midterm (90-day or 1-year) all-cause mortality and the safety outcomes included minor bleeding, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Results: In all, 59 studies (4457 patients) were eventually included in our study. For the prevalence study, we described the crude incidence for mortality and major bleeding for interventions like catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), AC, and systemic thrombolysis (ST) in patients with either intermediate or high-risk PE. Our data synthesis comparing CBT to AC included 1657 patients (11 studies) with intermediate-risk PE. Our results indicate that CBT is associated with a lower risk of both short-term (RR 0.43; 95% CI [0.24–0.79], I2 = 0%) and midterm all-cause mortality (RR 0.38; 95% CI [0.23–0.62], I2 = 0%) compared to AC. Major bleeding and ICH did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: In patients with intermediate-risk PE, our meta-analysis of the current literature suggests that CBT offers better outcomes in terms of short-term and midterm mortality compared to AC alone, with no difference in safety outcomes. Further RCTs are needed to explore and validate these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1712 KB  
Article
Management of Hemodynamic and Respiratory Instability and Anesthetic Approaches in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Thrombectomy for Pulmonary Embolism
by Susana González-Suárez, John Camacho Oviedo, José Maria Suriñach Caralt, Maria Grao Roca, Isuru M. Dammala Liyanage, Mercedes Pérez Lafuente, Elisabeth Mena Muñoz, Carla González Junyent, María Martínez-Martínez, Daniel Barnés Navarro and Juan Carlos Ruíz-Rodríguez
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2704; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082704 - 15 Apr 2025
Viewed by 970
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The incidence, timing, and predictors of hemodynamic and respiratory deterioration in patients with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) remain poorly understood. This hemodynamic and respiratory instability can lead to modifications in the anesthetic management. This study [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The incidence, timing, and predictors of hemodynamic and respiratory deterioration in patients with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) remain poorly understood. This hemodynamic and respiratory instability can lead to modifications in the anesthetic management. This study investigates these key factors and quantifies the 30-day mortality following thrombectomy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 98 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent PMT. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of cardiac arrest (CA). Results: Of the 98 patients, 34 had high-risk PE, 62 intermediate/high-risk, and 2 low risk. There were 27 cases of CA, 17 pre- and 10 intra-PMT. An SBP < 90 mmHg increases the risk of CA by 33 (p < 0.001); men have an 8-fold higher risk than women (p = 0.004); SpO2 <90% by 6 (p = 0.012); and pre-existing respiratory conditions increase the risk by 4 (p = 0.047)). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were 8206 ± 11660.86 and 2388.50 ± 5683.71 pg/mL (p = 0.035) in patients with and without CA, respectively. During PMT, 14% of patients required increased vasoactive drug use, and 38.77% were intubated, including 12 who required ECMO support. Sedation was administered in 64.3% of patients, while general anesthesia was used in 38.8%, with a preemptive indication in 23.5%. The survival rate of patients without CA before and/or during PMT was 96%. Conclusions: While PMT was successfully performed in all patients, hemodynamic and respiratory instability remained a significant concern. More than 10% of patients experienced severe hemodynamic instability, primarily during thrombus extraction, requiring conversion from sedation to general anesthesia. Male sex, pre-existing respiratory disease, SpO2 < 90%, and SBP < 90 mmHg were associated with an increased risk of CA. Additionally, elevated NT-proBNP levels were linked to a higher incidence of CA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 332 KB  
Review
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Non-Operating Room Anesthesia (NORA) Locations: Best Safety Practices and Local Insights
by Omar Elmadhoun, Jeffrey Huang, Arnoley S. Abcejo and Michael P. Merren
Healthcare 2025, 13(3), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030227 - 23 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1655
Abstract
Mortality rates from pulmonary embolism (PE) remain significant, highlighting the need for alternative treatment strategies beyond traditional anticoagulation. Percutaneous interventions, including mechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis, are emerging as promising options. Given the complex pathophysiology and unique risk profiles of these patients, meticulous [...] Read more.
Mortality rates from pulmonary embolism (PE) remain significant, highlighting the need for alternative treatment strategies beyond traditional anticoagulation. Percutaneous interventions, including mechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis, are emerging as promising options. Given the complex pathophysiology and unique risk profiles of these patients, meticulous multidisciplinary planning is essential. Anesthesiologists play a central role in coordinating care and managing perioperative risks to improve outcomes. This article provides insights into best safety practices and shares experiences from a leading quaternary center. It offers guidance for anesthesia providers to proactively engage in comprehensive risk stratification, participate in multidisciplinary discussions, and support robust contingency planning for managing PE patients undergoing percutaneous interventions in non-operating room anesthesia settings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 953 KB  
Review
Advanced Management of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Treatment for Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence-Based Strategies for Optimized Patient Care
by Francesco Costa, Alfonso Jurado-Román, Gabriele Carciotto, Victor Becerra-Munoz, Daniel Tébar Márquez, Felix Götzinger, Enrico Cerrato, Shantum Misra, Marco Spissu, Marco Pavani, Marco Mennuni, Fernando Carrasco Chinchilla, Antonio Dominguez-Franco, Antonio Muñoz-Garcia, Rocio Sanchez Navarrete, Ferdinando Varbella, Pablo Salinas-Sanguino, Eric A. Secemsky, Felix Mahfoud, Antonio Micari, Juan Horacio Alonso-Briales and Manuel Jimenez Navarroadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7780; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247780 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1912
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening medical condition caused by the thrombotic occlusion of one or more branches of the lung vasculature, which represents the third most common cause of cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction and stroke. PE treatment requires a tailored approach [...] Read more.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening medical condition caused by the thrombotic occlusion of one or more branches of the lung vasculature, which represents the third most common cause of cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction and stroke. PE treatment requires a tailored approach based on accurate risk stratification and personalized treatment decision-making. Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of PE management, yet patients at higher clinical risk may require more rapid reperfusion therapies. In recent years, transcatheter treatment has emerged as a valuable option for patients with intermediate–high or high-risk PE who have contraindications to systemic thrombolysis. Recent advancements in catheter-directed therapies, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy (CDMT), provide minimally invasive options for swift symptom relief and hemodynamic stabilization. This review aims to provide a practical approach for optimal patient selection and management for PE percutaneous therapies, supported by a thorough evaluation of the current evidence base supporting these procedures. A focus on post-procedural management, the prevention of recurrence, and monitoring for long-term complications such as chronic pulmonary hypertension and post-PE syndrome is also specifically tackled. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pulmonary Embolism: The Era of Catheter-Directed Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 1605 KB  
Review
A Practical Clinical Approach to Navigate Pulmonary Embolism Management: A Primer and Narrative Review of the Evolving Landscape
by Kevin Benavente, Bradley Fujiuchi, Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk, Pavan K. Kavali, Walter Ageno, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Marc Righini, Mahboob Alam, Rachel P. Rosovsky and Chayakrit Krittanawong
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7637; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247637 - 15 Dec 2024
Viewed by 3016
Abstract
Advances in imaging, pharmacological, and procedural technologies have rapidly expanded the care of pulmonary embolism. Earlier, more accurate identification and quantification has enhanced risk stratification across the spectrum of the disease process, with a number of clinical tools available to prognosticate outcomes and [...] Read more.
Advances in imaging, pharmacological, and procedural technologies have rapidly expanded the care of pulmonary embolism. Earlier, more accurate identification and quantification has enhanced risk stratification across the spectrum of the disease process, with a number of clinical tools available to prognosticate outcomes and guide treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants have enabled a consistent and more convenient long-term therapeutic option, with a greater shift toward outpatient treatment for a select group of low-risk patients. The array of catheter-directed therapies now available has contributed to a more versatile and nuanced armamentarium of treatment options, including ultrasound-facilitated thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. Research into supportive care for pulmonary embolism have explored the optimal use of vasopressors and volume resuscitation, as well as utilization of various devices, including right ventricular mechanical support and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Even in the realm of surgery, outcomes have steadily improved in experienced centers. This rapid expansion in diagnostic and therapeutic data has necessitated implementation of pulmonary embolism response teams to better interpret the available evidence, manage the utilization of advanced therapies, and coordinate multidisciplinary care. We provide a narrative review of the risk stratification and management of pulmonary embolism, with a focus on structuralizing the multidisciplinary approach and organizing the literature on new and emerging therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 370 KB  
Article
Perioperative Management and Outcomes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Submassive (Intermediate-Risk) Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
by Michael P. Merren, Mitchell R. Padkins, Hector R. Cajigas, Newton B. Neidert, Arnoley S. Abcejo and Omar Elmadhoun
Healthcare 2024, 12(17), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171714 - 27 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1440
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) embodies a large healthcare burden globally and is the third leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Submassive (intermediate-risk) PE accounts for 40% of this burden. However, the optimal treatment pathway for this population remains complex and ill-defined. Catheter-directed interventions [...] Read more.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) embodies a large healthcare burden globally and is the third leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Submassive (intermediate-risk) PE accounts for 40% of this burden. However, the optimal treatment pathway for this population remains complex and ill-defined. Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) have shown promise in directly impacting morbidity and mortality while demonstrating a favorable success rate, safety profile, and decreased length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit and hospital. This retrospective review included 22 patients (50% female) with submassive PE who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT). A total of 45% had a contraindication to thrombolytics, the mean pulmonary embolism severity index was 127, 36% had saddle PE, the average decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was 7.2 mmHg following MT, the average LOS was 6.9 days, the 30-day mortality rate was 9%, the major adverse event (MAE) rate was 9%, and the readmission rate was 13.6%. A total of 82% had successful removal of thrombus during MT with no major bleeding complications, intracranial hemorrhage events, or device-related deaths. Acknowledging the limitation of our small sample size, our data indicate that MT in the intermediate-high-risk submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) cohort resulted in a decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality compared to standard anticoagulation therapy alone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anesthesiology and Critical Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 286 KB  
Review
Evolution of Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams in the United States: A Review of the Literature
by Vidish Pandya, Akhil Avunoori Chandra, Andrea Scotti, Manaf Assafin, Aldo L. Schenone, Azeem Latib, Leandro Slipczuk and Asma Khaliq
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3984; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133984 - 8 Jul 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2690
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of cardiovascular mortality, with varying presentations and management challenges. Traditional treatment approaches often differ, particularly for submassive/intermediate-risk PEs, because of the lack of clear guidelines and comparative data on treatment efficacy. The introduction of pulmonary embolism [...] Read more.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of cardiovascular mortality, with varying presentations and management challenges. Traditional treatment approaches often differ, particularly for submassive/intermediate-risk PEs, because of the lack of clear guidelines and comparative data on treatment efficacy. The introduction of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) aims to standardize and improve outcomes in acute PE management through multidisciplinary collaboration. This review examines the conception, evolution, and operational mechanisms of PERTs while providing a critical analysis of their implementation and efficacy using retrospective trials and recent randomized trials. The study also explores the integration of advanced therapeutic devices and treatment protocols facilitated by PERTs. PERT programs have significantly influenced the management of both massive and submassive PEs, with notable improvements in clinical outcomes such as decreased mortality and reduced length of hospital stay. The utilization of advanced therapies, including catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, has increased under PERT guidance. Evidence from various studies, including those from the National PERT Consortium, underscores the benefits of these multidisciplinary teams in managing complex PE cases, despite some studies showing no significant difference in mortality. PERT programs have demonstrated potentials to reduce morbidity and mortality, streamlining the use of healthcare resources and fostering a model of sustainable practice across medical centers. PERT program implementation appears to have improved PE treatment protocols and innovated advanced therapy options, which will be further refined as they are employed in clinical practice. The continued expansion of the capabilities of PERTs and the forthcoming results from ongoing randomized trials are expected to further define and optimize management protocols for acute PEs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis)
12 pages, 7997 KB  
Review
Electrocardiographic Changes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Pulmonary Embolism—A Case Report and Literature Review
by Lukas Ley, Florian Messmer, Lukas Vaisnora, Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani, Dirk Bandorski and Michael Kostrzewa
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2548; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092548 - 26 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1856
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with an annual incidence of about 1/1000 persons. About every sixth patient dies within the first 30 days after diagnosis. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the first diagnostic tests performed, and is able to [...] Read more.
Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with an annual incidence of about 1/1000 persons. About every sixth patient dies within the first 30 days after diagnosis. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the first diagnostic tests performed, and is able to confirm the suspicion of PE with typical electrocardiographic signs. Some ECG signs and their regression are also prognostically relevant. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is one option for PE treatment, and aims to relieve right heart strain immediately. The first studies on endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using a dedicated device (FlowTriever System, Inari Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) yielded promising results. Methods: In the following, we report the case of a 66-year-old male patient who presented with New York Heart Association III dyspnea in our emergency department. Among typical clinical and laboratory results, he displayed very impressive electrocardiographic and radiological findings at the time of PE diagnosis. Results: After endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, the patient’s complaints and pulmonary hemodynamics improved remarkably. In contrast, the ECG worsened paradoxically 18 h after intervention. Nevertheless, control echocardiography 4 days after the intervention no longer showed any signs of right heart strain, and dyspnea had disappeared completely. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the patient presented as completely symptom-free with a high quality of life. His ECG and echocardiography were normal and excluded recurrent right heart strain. Conclusions: Overall, the patient benefitted remarkably from endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, resulting in an almost complete resolution of electrocardiographic PE signs at the 4-month follow-up after exhibiting multiple typical electrocardiographic PE signs at time of diagnosis and initial electrocardiographic worsening 18 h post successful intervention. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1439 KB  
Review
Cutting-Edge Techniques and Drugs for the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives
by Lorenzo Falsetti, Emanuele Guerrieri, Vincenzo Zaccone, Giovanna Viticchi, Silvia Santini, Laura Giovenali, Graziana Lagonigro, Stella Carletti, Linda Elena Gialluca Palma, Nicola Tarquinio and Gianluca Moroncini
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1952; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071952 - 28 Mar 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4049
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. Recent advances have led to the development of newer techniques and drugs aimed at improving PE management, reducing its associated morbidity and mortality and the complications related to anticoagulation. This [...] Read more.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. Recent advances have led to the development of newer techniques and drugs aimed at improving PE management, reducing its associated morbidity and mortality and the complications related to anticoagulation. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge and future perspectives on PE treatment. Anticoagulation represents the first-line treatment of hemodynamically stable PE, direct oral anticoagulants being a safe and effective alternative to traditional anticoagulation: these drugs have a rapid onset of action, predictable pharmacokinetics, and low bleeding risk. Systemic fibrinolysis is suggested in patients with cardiac arrest, refractory hypotension, or shock due to PE. With this narrative review, we aim to assess the state of the art of newer techniques and drugs that could radically improve PE management in the near future: (i) mechanical thrombectomy and pulmonary embolectomy are promising techniques reserved to patients with massive PE and contraindications or failure to systemic thrombolysis; (ii) catheter-directed thrombolysis is a minimally invasive approach that can be suggested for the treatment of massive or submassive PE, but the lack of large, randomized controlled trials represents a limitation to widespread use; (iii) novel pharmacological approaches, by agents inhibiting thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, factor Xia, and the complement cascade, are currently under investigation to improve PE-related outcomes in specific settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1324 KB  
Review
The Role of IVC Filters in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
by Samer Asmar, George Michael, Vincent Gallo and Mitchell D. Weinberg
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1494; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051494 - 5 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 6153
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a prevalent cardiovascular condition, ranking third globally after myocardial infarction and stroke. The risk of VTE rises with age, posing a growing concern in aging populations. Acute PE, with its [...] Read more.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a prevalent cardiovascular condition, ranking third globally after myocardial infarction and stroke. The risk of VTE rises with age, posing a growing concern in aging populations. Acute PE, with its high morbidity and mortality, emphasizes the need for early diagnosis and intervention. This review explores prognostic factors for acute PE, categorizing it into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk based on hemodynamic stability and right ventricular strain. Timely classification is crucial for triage and treatment decisions. In the contemporary landscape, low-risk PE patients are often treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACS) and rapidly discharged for outpatient follow-up. Intermediate- and high-risk patients may require advanced therapies, such as systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and IVC filter placement. The latter, particularly IVC filters, has witnessed increased usage, with evolving types like retrievable and convertible filters. However, concerns arise regarding complications and the need for timely retrieval. This review delves into the role of IVC filters in acute PE management, addressing their indications, types, complications, and retrieval considerations. The ongoing debate surrounding IVC filter use, especially in patients with less conventional indications, reflects the need for further research and data. Despite complications, recent studies suggest that clinically significant issues are rare, sparking discussions on the appropriate and safe utilization of IVC filters in select PE cases. The review concludes by highlighting current trends, gaps in knowledge, and potential avenues for advancing the role of IVC filters in future acute PE management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 651 KB  
Systematic Review
Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in Pulmonary Embolism Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review
by Rupak Desai, Maharshi Raval, Kokou Selom Adompreh-Fia, Jai Sivanandan Nagarajan, Nitin Ghadge, Ankit Vyas, Akhil Jain, Timir K. Paul, Rajesh Sachdeva and Gautam Kumar
Tomography 2023, 9(4), 1393-1407; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9040111 - 14 Jul 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3191
Abstract
Background: Traditionally, mechanical thrombectomy performed for pulmonary embolism (PE) necessitates the utilization of iodinated contrast. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been used as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in the management of acute high and intermediate-risk PE. Recently, with the shortage of contrast supplies [...] Read more.
Background: Traditionally, mechanical thrombectomy performed for pulmonary embolism (PE) necessitates the utilization of iodinated contrast. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been used as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in the management of acute high and intermediate-risk PE. Recently, with the shortage of contrast supplies and the considerable incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), other safer and more feasible IVUS methods have become desirable. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of IVUS in patients with PE undergoing thrombectomy. Methods: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for review studies, case reports, and case series. Clinical characteristics, outcomes and the usage of IVUS-guided mechanical thrombectomy during the treatment of acute high and intermediate-risk PE were examined in a descriptive analysis. Results: In this systematic review, we included one prospective study, two case series, and two case reports from July 2019 to May 2023. A total of 39 patients were evaluated; most were female (53.8%). The main presenting symptoms were dyspnea and chest pain (79.5%); three patients (7.9%) presented with syncope, one with shock and one with cardiac arrest. Biomarkers (troponin and BNP) were elevated in 94.6% of patients. Most patients (87.2%) had intermediate-risk PE, and 12.8% had high-risk PE. All patients presented with right-heart strain (RV/LV ratio ≥ 0.9, n = 39). Most patients (56.4%) had bilateral PE. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed using IVUS without contrast utilization in 39.4% of the patients. After the initial learning curve, contrast usage decreased gradually over time. There was a significant decrease in the composite mean arterial pressure immediately following IVUS-guided thrombectomy from 35.1 ± 7.2 to 25.2 ± 8.3 mmHg (p < 0.001). Post-procedure, there was no reported (0%) CI-AKI, no all-cause mortality, no major bleeding, or other adverse events. There was a significant improvement in symptoms and RV function at the mean follow-up. Conclusions: New evidence suggests that IVUS-guided mechanical thrombectomy is safe, with visualization of the thrombus for optimal intervention, and reduces contrast exposure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5117 KB  
Case Report
Use of Autotransfusion following Percutaneous Thrombectomy for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Pulmonary Embolism in a Single Session—A Case Report
by Franz Haertel, Laura Baez, Marcus Franz, Jurgen Bogoviku, Friederike Klein, Gudrun Dannberg, P. Christian Schulze and Sven Möbius-Winkler
Diagnostics 2023, 13(8), 1392; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13081392 - 11 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2335
Abstract
A 64-year-old male patient was admitted to the catheterization laboratory with a suspected myocardial infarction and in cardiogenic shock. Upon further investigation, a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism with signs of right heart dysfunction was discovered, leading to a decision to perform a direct [...] Read more.
A 64-year-old male patient was admitted to the catheterization laboratory with a suspected myocardial infarction and in cardiogenic shock. Upon further investigation, a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism with signs of right heart dysfunction was discovered, leading to a decision to perform a direct interventional treatment with a thrombectomy device for thrombus aspiration. The procedure was successful in removing almost the entirety of the thrombotic material from the pulmonary arteries. The patient’s hemodynamics stabilized and oxygenation improved instantly. The procedure required a total of 18 aspiration cycles. Each aspiration contained approx. 60 mL blood amounting to a total of approx. 1080 mL of blood. During the procedure, a mechanical blood salvage system was used to resupply 50% of the blood via autotransfusion that would otherwise have been lost. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for post-interventional care and monitoring. A CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries after the procedure confirmed the presence of only minor residual thrombotic material. The patient’s clinical, ECG, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters returned to normal or near normal ranges. The patient was discharged shortly after in stable conditions on oral anticoagulation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Techniques in Interventional Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1468 KB  
Review
Catheter-Directed Interventions for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
by Kajol J. Shah and Trisha L. Roy
Life 2022, 12(12), 1984; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121984 - 27 Nov 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 10815
Abstract
Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) leads to significant morbidity including pain, swelling, and difficulty walking in the affected limb. If left untreated, DVT increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and post thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The objective of [...] Read more.
Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) leads to significant morbidity including pain, swelling, and difficulty walking in the affected limb. If left untreated, DVT increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and post thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The objective of this review was to identify catheter-directed interventions and their success rates for the treatment of lower extremity DVT. A comprehensive search of current and emerging catheter-directed interventions for lower extremity DVT treatment was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. Clinical trials, retrospective and prospective observational studies, and case reports were identified to classify percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and pharmacomechanical CDT (PCDT) devices based on their mechanism of action and indication of use. Catheter-directed interventions such as PMT, CDT, and PCDT offer an alternative therapeutic strategy for DVT management, particularly in patients with limb-threatening conditions and absolute contraindications to anticoagulants. Currently, there are limited guidelines for the use of mechanical and pharmacomechanical devices because of the lack of clinical evidence available for their use in treatment. Future studies are required to determine the short and long-term effects of using catheter-directed interventions as well as their effectiveness in treating acute versus subacute and chronic DVT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Frontier of Venous Thromboembolism)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop