Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = radon priority areas

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1637 KB  
Article
Contextualizing Radon Mitigation into Healthy and Sustainable Home Design in the Commonwealth of Kentucky: A Conjoint Analysis
by Osama E. Mansour, Lydia (Niang) Cing and Omar Mansour
Sustainability 2025, 17(14), 6543; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146543 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 450
Abstract
Indoor radon constitutes a public health issue in various regions across the United States as the second leading cause of lung cancer following tobacco smoke. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency advises radon mitigation interventions for residential buildings with indoor radon concentrations exceeding the [...] Read more.
Indoor radon constitutes a public health issue in various regions across the United States as the second leading cause of lung cancer following tobacco smoke. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency advises radon mitigation interventions for residential buildings with indoor radon concentrations exceeding the threshold level of 4 pCi/L. Despite considerable research assessing the technical effectiveness of radon mitigation systems, there remains a gap in understanding their broader influence on occupant behavior and preferences in residential design. This study aims to investigate the impact of residing in radon-mitigated homes within the Commonwealth of Kentucky—an area known for elevated radon concentrations—on occupants’ preferences regarding healthy home design attributes. The objectives of this research are twofold: firstly to determine if living in radon-mitigated homes enhances occupant awareness and consequently influences their preferences toward health-related home attributes and secondly to quantitatively evaluate and compare the relative significance homeowners assign to health-related attributes such as indoor air quality, thermal comfort, and water quality relative to conventional attributes including home size, architectural style, and neighborhood quality. The overarching purpose is to explore the potential role radon mitigation initiatives may play in motivating occupants towards healthier home construction and renovation practices. Using choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis, this paper compares preferences reported by homeowners from radon-mitigated homes against those from non-mitigated homes. While the findings suggest a relationship between radon mitigation and increased preference for indoor air quality, the cross-sectional design limits causal interpretation, and the possibility of reverse causation—where health-conscious individuals are more likely to seek mitigation—must be considered. The results provide novel insights into how radon mitigation efforts might effectively influence occupant priorities towards integrating healthier design elements in residential environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pollution Prevention, Mitigation and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

46 pages, 557 KB  
Review
IAEA Safety Guides vs. Actual Challenges for Design and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys
by Andrey Tsapalov, Konstantin Kovler, Sergey Kiselev, Ilia Yarmoshenko, Robert Bobkier and Petr Miklyaev
Atmosphere 2025, 16(3), 253; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030253 - 23 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 888
Abstract
An analysis of the international radon regulatory framework identified actual challenges for the design and conduct of indoor radon surveys, though there is little discussion on this issue in the radon community. The main challenges hindering the development of radon regulation on an [...] Read more.
An analysis of the international radon regulatory framework identified actual challenges for the design and conduct of indoor radon surveys, though there is little discussion on this issue in the radon community. The main challenges hindering the development of radon regulation on an international scale, particularly in indoor radon surveys include the following: (i) responsibility for indoor radon testing and mitigation, (ii) excessive focus on Radon Priority Areas, (iii) the role of temporal uncertainty in indoor radon testing, (iv) the standardization of indoor radon measurements, and (v) the standardization of thoron EEC measurements and indoor testing. To address these gaps and inconsistencies, actual needs for design and conduct of indoor radon surveys are proposed, covering the aforementioned challenges. The needs statement, including a discussion of solutions, addresses the following key aspects of radon regulation: (1) legislation, (2) radon measurements, (3) awareness, and (4) building protection. The focus remains on the radon measurement aspect, detailing the strategy and tools for conducting indoor radon surveys within a rational approach. This includes the main research activities necessary for the sustainable development of global radon regulation. The final part of the article presents a Rational Method (protocol) of indoor radon measurements serving as a detailed guideline for standardizing indoor radon testing at the international level. This ensures the decision-making reliability of at least 95% and harmonizes relevant national approaches considering traditional measurement protocols using both short-term and long-term measurements. The proposed solutions aim to achieve the goal of a modern design and conduct of indoor radon surveys that are consistent with large-scale (mass) testing and effectively identify hazardous buildings. These solutions are based on a rational approach with convenient tools and active voluntary participation of the population to be implemented within the framework of national radon regulation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Radon Measurement and Radiation Exposure Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2273 KB  
Article
Pilot Survey of Outdoor Radon and Thoron Levels in Bulgaria Using an Innovative DVD-Based Method
by Dobromir Pressyanov and Dimitar Dimitrov
Atmosphere 2024, 15(9), 1141; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091141 - 21 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1263
Abstract
This study presents the results of a pilot survey utilizing an innovative DVD-based method to measure outdoor radon and thoron levels. Twenty-six discriminative radon/thoron detectors were deployed across four different territorial zones in Bulgaria. Positioned 1 m above the ground, these detectors were [...] Read more.
This study presents the results of a pilot survey utilizing an innovative DVD-based method to measure outdoor radon and thoron levels. Twenty-six discriminative radon/thoron detectors were deployed across four different territorial zones in Bulgaria. Positioned 1 m above the ground, these detectors were left in place for several months. Notably, the dataset reveals significant variability in measurements, even over short distances, with thoron exhibiting greater variability than radon. Radon levels ranged from 7 ± 1 to 34 ± 3 Bq m−3 (average: 21 Bq m−3), while thoron levels ranged from 13 ± 5 to 307 ± 54 Bq m−3 (average: 170 Bq m−3). A weak but statistically significant correlation (correlation coefficient: 0.559) was observed between radon and thoron levels, which improved significantly when averaged across the four zones. These findings underscore the importance of measuring both radon and thoron in outdoor surveys. High thoron levels can significantly bias radon measurements, particularly when radon concentrations are substantially lower than those of thoron. If further studies confirm the good correlation between area averages, the observed correlation between area-average values could be used to correct average radon levels in large areas (e.g., radon priority areas) for thoron interference when thoron data are missing from the analyzed radon dataset. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 488 KB  
Article
Italian National Radon Action Plan: New Challenges for Risk Assessment
by Giuseppe La Verde, Giuseppe Della Peruta, Chiara Imparato, Fabrizio Ambrosino, Rocco Mottareale, Gaetano Gagliardo and Mariagabriella Pugliese
Atmosphere 2024, 15(7), 846; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070846 - 18 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2134
Abstract
Radon gas is one of the chemical pollutants with one of the most significant physical effects due to its impact on human health: it is a radioactive noble gas which, if inhaled, can stochastically induce lung cancer. For this reason, it is classified [...] Read more.
Radon gas is one of the chemical pollutants with one of the most significant physical effects due to its impact on human health: it is a radioactive noble gas which, if inhaled, can stochastically induce lung cancer. For this reason, it is classified as a category A substance and is the second cause of cancer after tobacco smoking. The monitoring and management of indoor radon is based on international recommendations but also national regulations, which, in recent years, have been updated by lowering the reference levels. In this work, some radon activity concentration data were evaluated by comparing the criteria of old and new legislation to highlight how the radiation protection approach has completely changed. Specifically, this study focuses on measurements in Campania, which, due to its originally volcanic geological structure, requires crucial attention in the context of radon risk assessment, given the considerable number of dwellings built in tuff. This initial data processing enabled the identification of potential high-priority radon risk areas, serving as an important reference point for the extension of the monitoring activities in Campania. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution in Italy: Effects, Sources and Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

40 pages, 4139 KB  
Review
Overview of Radon Flux Characteristics, Measurements, Models and Its Potential Use for the Estimation of Radon Priority Areas
by Igor Čeliković, Gordana Pantelić, Ivana Vukanac, Jelena Krneta Nikolić, Miloš Živanović, Giorgia Cinelli, Valeria Gruber, Sebastian Baumann, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Luis Santiago Quindos Poncela and Daniel Rábago
Atmosphere 2022, 13(12), 2005; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13122005 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 4769
Abstract
Radon flux measurements provide information about how much radon rises from the ground toward the atmosphere, thus, they could serve as good predictors of indoor radon concentrations. Although there are many different mapping methods with many different input data, radon flux data are [...] Read more.
Radon flux measurements provide information about how much radon rises from the ground toward the atmosphere, thus, they could serve as good predictors of indoor radon concentrations. Although there are many different mapping methods with many different input data, radon flux data are generally missing and are not included for the delineation of radon priority areas (RPA). The aim of this literature review is to investigate to what extent radon flux was used, or could be used, for the delineation of RPAs. Numerous factors influencing radon flux were identified, but quantifying their contribution to radon flux measurement still remains a challenge. Different methods and measuring devices were used for the determination of radon flux, thus it is necessary to identify possible inconsistencies in order to harmonise different radon flux measurements. Due to the complexity of radon flux measurements, only two countries were identified to have performed national surveys on outdoor radon, which were of much smaller scale compared to those on indoor radon. A positive correlation between radon flux and radon quantities, such as radon in soil gas and indoor radon, indicates that radon flux could be used as an input parameter for the estimation of RPA. By reviewing radon flux models, it was concluded that up-to-date modelled radon flux maps have reached excellent spatial resolution and will be further improved, hence, they could serve as an input for the estimation and delineation of RPA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radon and NORM: Impact on Air Quality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 9990 KB  
Article
Radon Hazard in Central Italy: Comparison among Areas with Different Geogenic Radon Potential
by Francesca Giustini, Livio Ruggiero, Alessandra Sciarra, Stan Eugene Beaubien, Stefano Graziani, Gianfranco Galli, Luca Pizzino, Maria Chiara Tartarello, Carlo Lucchetti, Pietro Sirianni, Paola Tuccimei, Mario Voltaggio, Sabina Bigi and Giancarlo Ciotoli
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(2), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020666 - 7 Jan 2022
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 3718
Abstract
Radon (222Rn) is a natural radioactive gas formed in rocks and soil by the decay of its parent nuclide (238-Uranium). The rate at which radon migrates to the surface, be it along faults or directly emanated from shallow soil, represents the [...] Read more.
Radon (222Rn) is a natural radioactive gas formed in rocks and soil by the decay of its parent nuclide (238-Uranium). The rate at which radon migrates to the surface, be it along faults or directly emanated from shallow soil, represents the Geogenic Radon Potential (GRP) of an area. Considering that the GRP is often linked to indoor radon risk levels, we have conducted multi-disciplinary research to: (i) define local GRPs and investigate their relationship with associated indoor Rn levels; (ii) evaluate inhaled radiation dosages and the associated risk to the inhabitants; and (iii) define radon priority areas (RPAs) as required by the Directive 2013/59/Euratom. In the framework of the EU-funded LIFE-Respire project, a large amount of data (radionuclide content, soil gas samples, terrestrial gamma, indoor radon) was collected from three municipalities located in different volcanic districts of the Lazio region (central Italy) that are characterised by low to high GRP. Results highlight the positive correlation between the radionuclide content of the outcropping rocks, the soil Rn concentrations and the presence of high indoor Rn values in areas with medium to high GRP. Data confirm that the Cimini–Vicani area has inhalation dosages that are higher than the reference value of 10 mSv/y. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring and Measurements: Radon)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1830 KB  
Review
Outdoor Radon as a Tool to Estimate Radon Priority Areas—A Literature Overview
by Igor Čeliković, Gordana Pantelić, Ivana Vukanac, Jelena Krneta Nikolić, Miloš Živanović, Giorgia Cinelli, Valeria Gruber, Sebastian Baumann, Luis Santiago Quindos Poncela and Daniel Rabago
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(2), 662; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020662 - 7 Jan 2022
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 4077
Abstract
Doses from the exposure to outdoor radon are typically an order of magnitude smaller than those from indoor radon, causing a greater interest on investigation of the latter for radiation protection issues. As a consequence, assessment of radon priority areas (RPA) is mainly [...] Read more.
Doses from the exposure to outdoor radon are typically an order of magnitude smaller than those from indoor radon, causing a greater interest on investigation of the latter for radiation protection issues. As a consequence, assessment of radon priority areas (RPA) is mainly based on indoor radon measurements. Outdoor radon measurements might be needed to guarantee a complete estimation of radiological risk and may help to improve the estimation of RPA. Therefore, authors have analysed the available literature on outdoor radon to give an overview of outdoor radon surveys and potential correlation with indoor radon and estimation of RPA. The review has shown that outdoor radon surveys were performed at much smaller scale compared to indoor radon. Only a few outdoor radon maps were produced, with a much smaller density, covering a larger area, and therefore putting doubt on the representativeness of this data. Due to a large variety of techniques used for outdoor radon measurements and requirement to have detectors with a high sensitivity and resistance to harsh environmental conditions, a standardised measurement protocol should be derived. This is no simple endeavour since there are more applications in different scientific disciplines for outdoor radon measurements compared to indoor radon. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Indoor Radon Risk Assessment and Remedial Actions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2856 KB  
Article
A New Methodology for Defining Radon Priority Areas in Spain
by Alicia Fernández, Carlos Sainz, Santiago Celaya, Luis Quindós, Daniel Rábago and Ismael Fuente
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(3), 1352; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031352 - 2 Feb 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3454
Abstract
One of the requirements of EU-BSS (European Basic Safety Standards) is the design and implementation of a National Radon Action Plan in the member states. This should define, as accurately as possible, areas of risk for the presence of radon gas (222 [...] Read more.
One of the requirements of EU-BSS (European Basic Safety Standards) is the design and implementation of a National Radon Action Plan in the member states. This should define, as accurately as possible, areas of risk for the presence of radon gas (222Rn) in homes and workplaces. The concept used by the Spanish Nuclear Safety Council (CSN), the body responsible for nuclear safety and radiation protection in Spain, to identify “radon priority areas” is that of radon potential. This paper establishes a different methodology from that used by the CSN, using the same study variables (indoor radon measurements, gamma radiation exposure data, and geological information) to prepare a radon potential map that improves the definition of the areas potentially exposed to radon in Spain. The main advantage of this methodology is that by using simple data processing the definition of these areas is improved. In addition, the application of this methodology can improve the delimitation of radon priority areas and can be applied within the cartographic system used by the European Commission-Joint Research Center (EC-JRC) in the representation of different environmental parameters. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop