Search Results (55)

Background: The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial because of concerns regarding oncologic adequacy, particularly margin status. While robotic-assisted hepatectomy has gained adoption, its true perioperative advantages over conventional laparoscopy and open surgery remain unclear. SIMMILR-5 was designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and tele-robotic laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC using rigorous adjustment for confounding. Methods: A retrospective international multicenter study was conducted including patients undergoing liver resection for HCC between June 2004 and November 2024 at five high-volume hepatobiliary centers. Surgical approaches included open (O), conventional laparoscopy (L), and tele-robotic laparoscopy (TRL). Propensity score matching was performed using demographic, clinical, and tumor-related variables. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality (30 and 90 days). Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), R0 resection status, and major complications. Results: A total of 904 patients were identified (302 O, 568 L, 34 TRL). After matching, conventional laparoscopy was associated with significantly lower EBL, shorter operative time, and shorter LOS compared with open surgery (all p < 0.00001). Compared with open surgery, TRL was associated with lower EBL but no improvement in operative time or LOS. Compared with laparoscopy, TRL was associated with longer operative time and longer LOS. Short-term oncologic surrogates were comparable across approaches. Conclusions: Minimally invasive hepatectomy offers perioperative advantages over open surgery for selected patients with HCC, driven primarily by conventional laparoscopy. Tele-robotic hepatectomy is feasible and safe in experienced centers but does not demonstrate superiority over advanced laparoscopic techniques. Full article

Introduction: Simultaneous resection of primary colorectal malignancies and liver metastases resulted in outcomes comparable to those achieved through a two-stage procedure, while offering the advantage of a single surgical intervention. The role of the robotic approach remains underexplored because of the lack of comprehensive evidence. The objective of our study was to examine the safety of the robotic surgical platform, assess its short-term outcomes, and compare them with those of open procedures. Methods and Material: We retrospectively analyzed data from an initial small series of eight consecutive patients treated at the UMC Ljubljana between March 2023 and December 2025. These patients underwent robot-assisted simultaneous resection of colorectal malignancies and liver metastases. Their outcomes were compared with those of an open cohort of eight patients. Results: The median operative time was 334 min (range, 193–415 min). No conversions or transfusions were required. Three patients experienced severe complications, accounting for 37.5% of the cohort. The median duration of hospitalization was 9.5 days. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 22. Complete (R0) resection of the primary tumor was achieved in all cases (100%), whereas resection of the liver was achieved in 87.5% of the cases. Importantly, there were no instances of re-hospitalization within 30 days or mortality within 90 days. Conclusions: Although the rate of severe complications is relatively high, the robotic surgical platform allows for the safe simultaneous resection of colorectal malignancies and liver metastases, achieving short-term outcomes comparable to those of open surgery. Full article

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) constitutes 75–80% of all renal cell carcinomas and exhibits aggressive behavior with high metastatic potential. Common metastatic sites include lungs, bones, lymph nodes, and liver, while urinary bladder involvement is exceedingly rare. Early detection of atypical metastases is critical for risk stratification, surgical planning, and systemic therapy selection. Methods: We report a 69-year-old male presenting with recurrent, painless gross hematuria and dysuria. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a left renal mass with bilateral pulmonary nodules, regional lymphadenopathy, and a bladder lesion. The patient underwent transurethral resection (TUR) of the bladder lesion, followed by robot-assisted left nephro-adrenalectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry (PAX8+, CD10+, CAIX+, CK7−, GATA3−) confirmed ccRCC with synchronous bladder metastasis. Postoperatively, combined immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were initiated. Results: TUR provided symptomatic relief and diagnostic confirmation. Robot-assisted surgery enabled precise, oncologically safe excision of the primary tumor and regional metastases with minimal blood loss and no perioperative complications. Pathological staging was pT3aN1M1, ISUP grade 2, with lymphovascular invasion, confirming advanced disease requiring systemic therapy. Early initiation of ICI plus TKI therapy targeted residual micrometastases to potentially prolong survival. Conclusions: This case highlights the rare occurrence of ccRCC with synchronous bladder metastasis and underscores the importance of comprehensive imaging, detailed morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation, and a multidisciplinary approach. Robot-assisted cytoreductive surgery combined with modern systemic therapy represents an effective strategy for advanced ccRCC, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment and long-term follow-up in atypical metastatic scenarios. Full article

Background and Objectives: Robot-assisted procedures represent a significant advancement in minimally invasive liver resection techniques. Nonetheless, the introduction of a novel surgical technique in a new environment necessitates meticulous planning and a gradual, stepwise approach. This study describes the adoption of a robotic surgical platform for liver resection at a high-volume tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data that had been prospectively collected from fifty robot-assisted liver resections. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means/medians, and standard deviations, were employed for description and summary. Results: The median operative duration was 166 min (range: 85–400 min), with an average intraoperative blood loss of 200 mL (range: 50–1000 milliliters). Intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion was required in 8% of patients. Conversion to open resection was necessary in one patient (2%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 5 days (range: 3–20 days), with a 30-day readmission rate of 6% and no mortality within 90 days. Postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher were observed in five patients (10%). The mean tumor size varied according to pathology: 58.5 mm (range: 30–120 mm) in the hepatocellular carcinoma group; 27.4 mm (range: 10–32 mm) in the secondary malignancy group; and 42.6 mm (range: 24–60 mm) in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group. The median number of lymph nodes harvested during lymphadenectomy (IHHCA/GBCA) was 5.4, ranging from 1 to 11. The R0 resection rate for malignant tumors was 88.2% (of 30/34). Conclusions: This study validates the safe integration of robot-assisted surgery into liver disease treatment, supported by our initial experience. Despite its technical advantages, robotic-assisted liver surgery remains complex and demanding. Structured robotic training within established programs, meticulous patient selection, and a stepwise implementation approach are critical during the early phases to optimize the outcomes. Full article

Background: Robotic liver surgery is emerging as a key advancement in minimally invasive techniques, though it still faces several challenges. Meanwhile, colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be a leading cause of cancer deaths, with liver metastases affecting 25–30% of patients. These metastases significantly burden healthcare systems by raising costs and resource demands. Methods: A narrative literature review was performed, resulting in the inclusion of 14 studies in our analysis. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed with attention to patient characteristics, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and reporting limitations. For consistency, simultaneous robotic-assisted resection (RAR) refers to cases in which the colorectal primary and liver metastasectomy were performed during the same operative session. Results: The 14 studies included a total of 771 patients (520 males and 251 females), aged between 31 and 88, undergoing simultaneous robotic-assisted resection (RAR). Most were affected by rectal cancer (76%) and unilobar liver metastases (82%). All surgeries using the DaVinci system are represented by 62% wedge resection and 38% anatomical (21.39% major and 16.61% minor). Patients’ BMI ranged from 19.5 to 40.4 kg/m², the average blood loss was 181.5 mL (30–780), the median hospital stay was 7 days (range 2–28), and the mean operative time ranged from 30 to 682 min. Data on POLF (postoperative liver failure) are reported in two studies: Rocca et al., 1/90 patients; Marino et al., 1/40 patients. Biliary leak is reported in one case by Marino et al., while Winckelmans et al. reported a 2.6% incidence of biliary leak in the laparoscopic group and 3.4% in the robotic group. Conclusions: As research advances and new therapies emerge for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. However, evidence is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous study designs, inconsistent reporting of perioperative chemotherapy, timing of surgery, metastasis localization, and complications. Robotic liver surgery has become a well-established technique and possibly represents the future for managing colorectal liver metastases. Further prospective and comparative studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to define optimal patient selection and long-term effectiveness. Full article

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer with a poor prognosis. Negative-margin resection is presently the only potentially curative treatment option. Emerging trends with direct applicability to surgical strategy include margin thickness, lymphadenectomy, optimization of future liver remnant (FLR), minimally invasive techniques, incorporation of systemic therapy, and reconsideration of liver transplantation. This review emphasizes areas of consensus and ongoing debate. Margins ≥5–10 mm are associated with improved results, but biology generally takes precedence over prognosis. Regional lymphadenectomy enhances staging accuracy, although its therapeutic benefit remains unsettled. PVE is standard for FLR enlargement, LVD provides faster hypertrophy, and ALPPS remains reserved for highly selective cases. Minimally invasive and robotic hepatectomy share oncologic results in skilled institutions. Systemic therapies, including immunotherapy and biomarker-directed targeted therapy, are increasingly being incorporated perioperatively. Liver transplant may be of potential value in early-stage disease or on strict indications after neoadjuvant treatment. The modern surgical management of iCCA encompasses a blend of oncologic considerations, FLR optimization, minimally invasive surgery, and systemic therapy according to tumor biology. Multidisciplinary planning and participation in clinical trials are necessary to align surgical innovation with advancements in molecular and systemic treatments, ultimately leading to improved long-term outcomes. Full article

Background: Robotic liver resection (RLR) has seen remarkable advancements in recent years, overcoming many limitations of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). RLR has evolved to include increasingly complex procedures, offering enhanced precision, reduced blood loss, and lower complication rates. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 consecutive RLRs, performed at the Department of General Surgery II and HPB Unit of Santa Chiara Hospital (Trento, Italy), between January 2013 and June 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Collected data included demographics, disease etiology, operative parameters, oncologic margins, and perioperative outcomes. Results: Indications were malignant disease in 83% of cases while benign disease accounted for 17%. Minor resections accounted for 91%. Cirrhosis was present in 49% of patients (Child–Pugh A 91%; B 9%; mean MELD 9). According to the Iwate difficulty score, resections were low difficulty in 38% of cases, intermediate in 50%, advanced in 7%, expert in 5%. Conversion rate was 12%, mainly for bleeding or adhesions. Mean blood loss was 159 mL (66% <100 mL); Pringle maneuver was used in 3%; drains omitted in 45%; ICG fluorescence used in 81%. Mean operative time was 250 min (console time 184 min). Mean lesion size was 34 mm; R0 margin rate was 82%. Overall mortality was 1.3%; morbidity 24% (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III in 10%). Mean hospital stay was 7 days (median 5; range 2–46). Conclusions: RLR is a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopy, providing comparable or superior perioperative outcomes. Medium-volume centers can achieve high-quality results with RLR. Continued technological advancements will further expand its applications to increasingly complex liver procedures. Full article

Background: Breast cancer is a widespread disease and, when metastatic, has a bleak prognosis. The surgical approach for BCLM has had a limited role, but robotic surgery could find an important place. Methods: Data were collected from a multicenter retrospective database that includes 1070 consecutive robotic liver resections performed in nine European hospital centers from 2011 to 2023. Of the entire series, 35 were performed for BCLM in five European hospital centers. Results: The post-operative complication rate was 11.44%, but no severe complications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 4.65 days. One patient (2.85%) was readmitted to the hospital within 90 days after discharge and died due to heart failure, with a 90-day mortality of 2.85%. Conclusions: Robotic liver resection for BCLM is feasible and safe when performed in experienced centers by surgeons who have completed the learning curve. Full article

The management of de novo kidney tumors (DKTs) after liver transplantation (LT) is challenging due to previous transplant surgery and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity. Minimally invasive renal-sparing strategies like robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) are favored, but a transperitoneal approach may be limited by the previous transplant surgery and the location of the DKT; in such cases, CT-guided cryoablation may be an alternative option. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare RPN and cryoablation for the treatment of DKT in LT recipients. The primary endpoints were the efficacy (R0 resection in RPN, absence of the tumor at first follow-up for cryoablation) and the safety of the procedures (postoperative morbidity and increase in creatine level). The periprocedural costs and the oncologic efficacy (recurrence and overall survival) were the secondary endpoints. Twelve LT recipients (91.7% males, mean age 65 years) underwent RPN (n = 6) or cryoablation (n = 6) for DKT; the median interval between LT and diagnosis of DKT was 142.5 vs. 117.5 months, respectively. Efficacy was obtained in all patients after RPN and cryoablation. Postoperative morbidity was 16.7% in each group, and the postoperative increase in creatinine values was similar. Hospital stay was shorter following cryoablation vs. RPN (3.1 vs. 6.7 days; p = 0.03). The mean procedural costs were higher for RPN. There was no mortality and none of the patients had signs of recurrence after a median follow-up of 40.5 months. Both RPN and CT-guided cryoablation were safe and effective for the treatment of selected patients with DKT after LT. When applicable, cryoablation may be cost-effective and provide faster recovery. Full article

Background: Liver resection is the standard treatment for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The advent of robotic surgery has extended its application in liver surgery, reducing post-operative complications without compromising oncological safety. This study is a retrospective series with the aim of analyzing the preoperative patient’s and tumor’s characteristics and evaluating intraoperative and post-operative data in terms of hospital stay, complications, and oncological radicality. Methods: Data were collected from a multicenter retrospective database that includes 1070 consecutive robotic liver resections (RLRs) performed in nine European hospital centers from 2011 to 2023. Of the entire series, 343 liver resections were performed for HCC. Results: A total of 247 patients (72.3%) had mono-focal lesions. Major hepatectomies and anatomical resections have been perfomed in 87% and 55% of patients, respectively. All 17 conversions (4.95%) were to the open approach. The operative mean time was 239.56 min and the estimated blood loss was 229.45 mL. The overall post-operative complication rate was 22.74%, but severe complications occurred in 4.08% of patients and one of them (0.29%) was reoperated on. The mean hospital stay was 5.82 days with a mean ICU stay of 0.9 days. Twenty-six resections (7.6%) were R1 parenchymal. Forty-six patients (4.08%) were readmitted to the hospital within 90 days after discharge and seventy-eight patients (22.74%) had disease recurrence. Total deaths included 36 (10.5%) patients with a 90-day mortality of 0.9%. Conclusions: Robotic liver resection for HCC is feasible and safe when performed in experienced centers by surgeons who have completed the learning curve. Full article

Background and Objectives: Resection of the caudate lobe of the liver is considered a highly challenging surgical procedure due to the deep anatomic location of this segment and the relationships with major vessels. There is no clear evidence about the safety and effectiveness of robotic resection of the caudate lobe. The aim of this systematic review was to report data about the safety, technical feasibility, and postoperative outcomes of robotic caudate lobectomy. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases was undertaken, including studies published until 19 December 2024. Results: A total of 5 studies including 110 patients were selected. Of these surgeries, 56.3% were performed for malignant tumors. Tumor size varied significantly between 0.9 and 7.7 cm in the largest diameter. The mean operative time was 184.5 min (range 70–522 min), and the estimated blood loss was 95.5 mL (range 10–1500 mL). The median hospital length of stay was 4.2 days (range 2–19 days) and no cases of conversion to open were reported. All the patients underwent R0 resection. In total, 24 out of 110 patients (21.8%) developed postoperative complications, with 1.8% of all patients developing a major complication (Clavien–Dindo classification ≥ III). No perioperative deaths were reported by the included studies. Conclusions: Few retrospective studies investigating the outcomes of robotic resection of the caudate lobe are currently available in the literature. From published data, it may be a safe and feasible alternative to open and laparoscopic caudate lobectomy in selected patients in referral HPB centers. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm such preliminary findings. Full article

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the evolution in textbook outcome (TO) achievement after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over two decades at a single tertiary referral center. Materials and Methods: All consecutive liver resections for HCC at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2022 were analyzed. The included 1334 patients were divided into four groups by time intervals identified through change point analysis. TO was defined as no intraoperative transfusions, positive margins, major complications, 30-day readmission or mortality, and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: Multiple change point analysis identified three change points (2006, 2012, 2017), and patients were divided into four groups. More recent time interval groups were associated with older age (59 vs. 59 vs. 61 vs. 63 years, p < 0.0001) and more comorbidities. Minimally invasive procedures were increasingly performed (open/laparoscopic/robotic 37.0%/63.0%/0%) vs. 43.8%/56.2%/0% vs. 17.1%/82.4%/0.5% vs. 22.9%/75.9%/1.2%, p < 0.0001). TO achievement improved over time (1.9% vs. 18.5% vs. 47.7% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.0001), and LOS was the greatest limiting factor. Conclusions: TO after liver resection improved with advances in minimally invasive techniques and parenchymal sparing procedures, even in older patients with more comorbidities and advanced tumors. Full article

Background: In Japan, the hinotori™ surgical robot system (Medicaroid Corporation, Kobe, Japan) was approved for gastrointestinal surgeries in October 2022. This report details our initial experience performing liver resection using the hinotori™ system. Methods: Ten patients, who were assessed as cases that would benefit from the robot-assisted procedure, underwent liver resections using the hinotori™ system at Fujita Health University, Okazaki Medical Center, between August 2023 and October 2024. The backgrounds (patient, tumor, and liver function conditions, along with types of liver resections and previous surgical procedures) and short-term outcomes (operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, open conversion, length of hospital stay, and mortality) of the cases were evaluated. Results: Eight cases of partial liver resection, one extended left medial sectionectomy, and one left hemi-hepatectomy were performed. Six cases of hepatocellular carcinomas, three cases of liver metastases, and one case of hepatolithiasis were included. There were seven male and three female patients with a median age of 70 years. Three physical status class III and seven class II patients were included. The median body mass index was 24. Five patients had previous upper abdominal surgical histories and five patients had liver cirrhosis. The median operation time was 419.5 min, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 276 mL. An open conversion in one hepatocellular carcinoma case was carried out due to bleeding from collateral vessels in the round ligament. The median length of hospital stay was 7.5 days. A grade IIIa complication (delayed bile leakage) was developed in one case. All patients with tumors underwent R0 resection. There were no cases of mortality. Conclusions: Liver resection using the hinotori™ system was feasibly performed. This study reports the first global use of the hinotori™ system for liver resection. Full article

Background: Liver resection is a critical surgical procedure for treating various hepatic pathologies. Minimally invasive approaches have gradually gained importance, and, in recent years, the introduction of robotic surgery has transformed the surgical landscape, providing potential advantages such as enhanced precision and stable ergonomic vision. Among robotic techniques, the single-site approach has garnered increasing attention due to its potential to minimize surgical trauma and improve cosmetic outcomes. However, the full extent of its utility and efficacy in liver resection has yet to be thoroughly explored. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review to evaluate the current role of the single-site robotic approach in liver resection. A detailed search of PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies published up to January 2024. Eligible studies were critically appraised, and data concerning surgical outcomes, perioperative parameters, and post-operative complications were extracted and analyzed. Results: Our review synthesizes evidence from six studies, encompassing a total of seven cases undergoing robotic single-site hepatic resection (SSHR) using various versions of the da Vinci© system. Specifically, the procedures included five left lateral segmentectomy, one right hepatectomy, and one caudate lobe resection. We provide a summary of the surgical techniques, indications, selection criteria, and outcomes associated with this approach. Conclusion: The single-site robotic approach represents an option among the minimally invasive approaches in liver surgery. However, although the feasibility has been demonstrated, further studies are needed to elucidate its optimal utilization, long-term outcomes, and comparative effectiveness against the other techniques. This systematic review provides valuable insights into the current state of single-site robotic liver resection and underscores the need for continued research in this rapidly evolving field. Full article

Background: the role of minimally invasive liver surgery has been progressively developed, with the practice increasing in safety and feasibility also with respect to major liver resections. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of major liver resection in elderly patients. Methods: data from a multicentric retrospective database including 1070 consecutive robotic liver resections in nine European hospital centers were analyzed. Among these, 131 were major liver resections. Patients were also divided in two groups (<65 years old and ≥65 years old) and perioperative data were compared between the two groups. Results: a total of 131 patients were included in the study. Operative time was 332 ± 125 min. Postoperative overall complications occurred in 27.1% of patients. Severe complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ 3) were 9.9%. Hospital stay was 6.6 ± 5.3 days. Patients were divided into two groups based on their age: 75 patients < 65 years old and 56 patients ≥ 65 years old. Prolonged pain, lung infection, intensive care stay, and 90-day readmission were worse in the elderly group. The two groups were matched for ASA and Charlson comorbidity score and, after statistical adjustment, postoperative data were similar between two groups. Conclusions: robotic major liver resection in elderly patients was associated with satisfying short-term outcomes. Full article