Search Results (12)

This study aimed to evaluate the cardioprotective effects of two different doses of saroglitazar (SAR) in an animal model of cardiotoxicity induced by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Thirty-five rats were randomly allocated into five groups: the negative control, which received distilled water; the 5-FU (150 mg/kg as I.P.) group; the N-acetylcysteine (100 mg/kg) group; and the SAR (0.5 and 5 mg/kg) groups. The last three groups received 5-FU on day 10 along with their treatment. An open field test was performed at zero-time and at the end of the study. On day eleven the animals were euthanized and blood samples were used for measuring troponin I, CK-MB, natriuretic peptide, lipid profile, LDH, ALT, AST, CRP, ESR, TNF-α, IL1β, MDA, and total antioxidant capacity (TAOC). Cardiac tissues were sent for histopathological examination. The study revealed that 5-FU elevated the levels of cardiac-specific and injury-related biomarkers, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and that the use of SAR, particularly the high dose, decreased all the cardiac- and other injury-related biomarkers as well as attenuating inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers. SAR-treated groups exhibited a significant increase in locomotor activity and a decrease in anxiety-like behavior, indicated by a reduction in time spent in one square and an increase in total movement time. Additionally, the histopathological findings greatly supported the biochemical results evidenced by stopping the detrimental effects caused by 5-FU through structural and functional alterations of cardiac tissues manifested as ameliorating congestion, inflammation, degeneration, arterial wall thinning, and endothelial loss. The dual-acting PPAR agonist SAR demonstrated cardiac protection activity, particularly the high dose, by attenuating cardiac-specific and nonspecific injury biomarkers along with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities and attenuated anxiety induced by 5-FU. These findings render SAR a promising candidate to be tested in clinical trials. Further studies are warranted with other cardiotoxicants to confirm these findings. Full article

Background and Objectives: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal interstitial lung disease with limited therapeutic options. Current therapies (pirfenidone, nintedanib) exhibit modest efficacy and significant side effects, underscoring the need for novel strategies targeting early pathogenic drivers. Saroglitazar (SGZ), a dual PPARα/γ agonist with anti-inflammatory properties approved for diabetic dyslipidemia, has not been explored for IPF. We aimed to investigate SGZ’s therapeutic potential in pulmonary fibrosis and elucidate its mechanisms of action. Materials and Methods: Using a bleomycin (BLM)-induced murine pulmonary fibrosis model, we administered SGZ therapeutically. A histopathological assessment (H&E, Masson’s trichrome, collagen I immunofluorescence), Western blotting, and qRT-PCR analyzed the fibrosis progression and inflammatory markers. Flow cytometry evaluated the macrophage polarization. In vitro studies used RAW264.7 macrophages stimulated with BLM/LPS and MRC-5 fibroblast co-cultures. The NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway activation was assessed through protein and gene expression. Results: SGZ significantly attenuated BLM-induced histopathological hallmarks, including alveolar wall thickening, collagen deposition, and inflammatory infiltration. Fibrotic markers (OPN, α-SMA) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) were downregulated in the SGZ-treated mice. Mechanistically, SGZ suppressed the M1 macrophage polarization (reduced CD86⁺ populations) and inhibited the NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway activation in the alveolar macrophages. In the RAW264.7 cells, SGZ decreased the NLRP3 inflammasome components (ASC, cleaved IL-1β) and cytokine secretion. Co-cultures demonstrated that the SGZ-treated macrophage supernatants suppressed the fibroblast activation (α-SMA, collagen I) in MRC-5 cells. Conclusions: SGZ attenuates pulmonary fibrosis by suppressing macrophage-driven inflammation via NF-κB/NLRP3 inhibition and disrupting the macrophage–fibroblast crosstalk. These findings nominate SGZ as a promising candidate for preclinical optimization and future clinical evaluation in IPF. Full article

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterized by progressive bile duct damage and cholestasis. While ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line therapy, approximately 40% of patients have incomplete responses, necessitating alternative treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel oral anti-cholestatic agents for PBC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases up to September 2024. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating novel oral anti-cholestatic agents in adult PBC patients were included. The primary outcome was a change in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. Safety was assessed by the incidence of serious adverse events. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed. Results: Ten studies involving 878 patients were analyzed. Novel agents included seladelpar, fenofibrate, saroglitazar, bezafibrate, elafibranor, and budesonide. The meta-analysis showed significant reductions in ALP levels with novel agents compared to the controls (SMD −2.80; 95% CI −3.56, −2.03; p < 0.00001), with high heterogeneity (I² = 93%). Saroglitazar achieved the largest effect size. There was no significant difference in serious adverse events between novel agents and controls (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.81, 1.83; p = 0.35). Conclusions: Novel oral anti-cholestatic agents show promise in improving biochemical markers in PBC patients with suboptimal UDCA responses, with a safety profile comparable to controls. However, study heterogeneity and limited long-term data restrict direct comparisons. Larger standardized trials with extended follow-up are needed to confirm long-term efficacy and safety. Full article

With around one billion of the world’s population affected, the era of the metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) pandemic has entered the global stage. MAFLD is a chronic progressive liver disease with accompanying metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity which can progress asymptomatically to liver cirrhosis and subsequently to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and for which to date there are almost no approved pharmacologic options. Because MAFLD has a very complex etiology and it also affects extrahepatic organs, a multidisciplinary approach is required when it comes to finding an effective and safe active substance for MAFLD treatment. The optimal drug for MAFLD should diminish steatosis, fibrosis and inflammation in the liver, and the winner for MAFLD drug authorisation seems to be the one that significantly improves liver histology. Saroglitazar (Lipaglyn^®) was approved for metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in India in 2020; however, the drug is still being investigated in other countries. Although the pharmaceutical industry is still lagging behind in developing an approved pharmacologic therapy for MAFLD, research has recently intensified and many molecules which are in the final stages of clinical trials are expected to be approved in the coming few years. Already this year, the first drug (Rezdiffra™) in the United States was approved via accelerated procedure for treatment of MAFLD, i.e., of MASH in adults. This review underscores the most recent information related to the development of drugs for MAFLD treatment, focusing on the molecules that have come furthest towards approval. Full article

Three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor subtypes, PPARα, PPAR(ß/)δ, and PPARγ, exert ligand-dependent transcriptional control in concert with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) on various gene sets harboring PPAR response elements (PPREs) in their promoter regions. Ligand-bound PPAR/RXR complexes do not directly regulate transcription; instead, they recruit multiprotein coactivator complexes to specific genomic regulatory loci to cooperatively activate gene transcription. Several coactivators are expressed in a single cell; however, a ligand-bound PPAR can be associated with only one coactivator through a consensus LXXLL motif. Therefore, altered gene transcription induced by PPAR subtypes/agonists may be attributed to the recruitment of various coactivator species. Using a time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay, we analyzed the recruitment of four coactivator peptides (PGC1α, CBP, SRC1, and TRAP220) to human PPARα/δ/γ-ligand-binding domains (LBDs) using eight PPAR dual/pan agonists (bezafibrate, fenofibric acid, pemafibrate, pioglitazone, elafibranor, lanifibranor, saroglitazar, and seladelpar) that are/were anticipated to treat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. These agonists all recruited four coactivators to PPARα/γ-LBD with varying potencies and efficacy. Only five agonists (bezafibrate, pemafibrate, elafibranor, lanifibranor, and seladelpar) recruited all four coactivators to PPARδ-LBD, and their concentration-dependent responses differed from those of PPARα/γ-LBD. These results indicate that altered gene expression through consensus PPREs by different PPAR subtypes/agonists may be caused, in part, by different coactivators, which may be responsible for the unique pharmacological properties of these PPAR agonists. Full article

Saroglitazar is a novel medication for dyslipidemia, but its specific effects remain unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar for managing dyslipidemia. The PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 2 and 4 mg of saroglitazar with placebos for treating dyslipidemia. A random-effects model calculated the pooled mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The study included seven RCTs involving 1975 patients. Overall, 340 (31.0%) and 513 (46.8%) participants received 2 and 4 mg of saroglitazar, respectively; 242 (22.11%) received the placebo. The mean ages ranged from 40.2 to 62.6 years, and 436 (39.8%) were women. Compared to the control group, 4 mg of saroglitazar significantly decreased the triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels but did not affect the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Furthermore, the alanine aminotransferase level significantly decreased, the creatine level significantly increased, and body weight did not differ between the groups. Finally, 4 mg of saroglitazar, compared to 2 mg, significantly lowered the triglyceride level. Saroglitazar (4 mg) may be an effective treatment, but safety concerns remain. Full article

The number of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing globally and is raising serious concerns regarding the increasing medical and economic burden incurred for their treatment. The progression of NASH to more severe conditions such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma requires liver transplantation to avoid death. Therefore, therapeutic intervention is required in the NASH stage, although no therapeutic drugs are currently available for this. Several anti-NASH candidate drugs have been developed that enable treatment via the modulation of distinct signaling cascades and include a series of drugs targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes (PPARα/δ/γ) that are considered to be attractive because they can regulate both systemic lipid metabolism and inflammation. Multiple PPAR dual/pan agonists have been developed but only a few of them have been evaluated in clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH. Herein, we review the current clinical trial status and future prospects of PPAR-targeted drugs for treating NAFLD/NASH. In addition, we summarize our recent findings on the binding modes and the potencies/efficacies of several candidate PPAR dual/pan agonists to estimate their therapeutic potentials against NASH. Considering that the development of numerous PPAR dual/pan agonists has been abandoned because of their serious side effects, we also propose a repositioning of the already approved, safety-proven PPAR-targeted drugs against NAFLD/NASH. Full article

No therapeutic drugs are currently available for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) that progresses from nonalcoholic fatty liver via oxidative stress-involved pathways. Three cognate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes (PPARα/δ/γ) are considered as attractive targets. Although lanifibranor (PPARα/δ/γ pan agonist) and saroglitazar (PPARα/γ dual agonist) are currently under investigation in clinical trials for NASH, the development of seladelpar (PPARδ-selective agonist), elafibranor (PPARα/δ dual agonist), and many other dual/pan agonists has been discontinued due to serious side effects or little/no efficacies. This study aimed to obtain functional and structural insights into the potency, efficacy, and selectivity against PPARα/δ/γ of three current and past anti-NASH investigational drugs: lanifibranor, seladelpar, and elafibranor. Ligand activities were evaluated by three assays to detect different facets of the PPAR activation: transactivation assay, coactivator recruitment assay, and thermal stability assay. Seven high-resolution cocrystal structures (namely, those of the PPARα/δ/γ-ligand-binding domain (LBD)–lanifibranor, PPARα/δ/γ-LBD–seladelpar, and PPARα-LBD–elafibranor) were obtained through X-ray diffraction analyses, six of which represent the first deposit in the Protein Data Bank. Lanifibranor and seladelpar were found to bind to different regions of the PPARα/δ/γ-ligand-binding pockets and activated all PPAR subtypes with different potencies and efficacies in the three assays. In contrast, elafibranor induced transactivation and coactivator recruitment (not thermal stability) of all PPAR subtypes, but the PPARδ/γ-LBD–elafibranor cocrystals were not obtained. These results illustrate the highly variable PPARα/δ/γ activation profiles and binding modes of these PPAR ligands that define their pharmacological actions. Full article

The pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is complex, owing to its diverse pathological drivers and, until recently, there were no approved drugs for this disease. Tecomella is a popular herbal medicine used to treat hepatosplenomegaly, hepatitis, and obesity. However, the potential role of Tecomella undulata in NASH has not yet been scientifically investigated. The administration of Tecomella undulata via oral gavage lowered body weight, insulin resistance, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), triglycerides, and total cholesterol in western diet sugar water (WDSW) fed mice but had no effect on chow diet normal water (CDNW) fed mice. Tecomella undulata improved steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning and resolved NASH in WDSW mice. Furthermore, Tecomella undulata also alleviated the WDSW-induced Endoplasmic Reticulum stress and oxidative stress, enhanced antioxidant status, and thus reduced inflammation in the treated mice. Of note, these effects were comparable to saroglitazar, the approved drug used to treat human NASH and the positive control used in the study. Thus, our findings indicate the potential of Tecomella undulata to ameliorate WDSW-induced steatohepatitis, and these preclinical data provide a strong rationale for assessing Tecomella undulata for the treatment of NASH. Full article

Non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFLD) over the past years has become a metabolic pandemic linked to a collection of metabolic diseases. The nuclear receptors ERRs, REV-ERBs, RORs, FXR, PPARs, and LXR are master regulators of metabolism and liver physiology. The characterization of these nuclear receptors and their biology has promoted the development of synthetic ligands. The possibility of targeting these receptors to treat NAFLD is promising, as several compounds including Cilofexor, thiazolidinediones, and Saroglitazar are currently undergoing clinical trials. This review focuses on the latest development of the pharmacology of these metabolic nuclear receptors and how they may be utilized to treat NAFLD and subsequent comorbidities. Full article

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects one-third of the population worldwide, of which a substantial number of patients suffer from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH is a severe condition characterized by steatosis and concomitant liver inflammation and fibrosis, for which no drug is yet available. NAFLD is also generally conceived as the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome. Consequently, well-established drugs that are indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and hyperlipidemia are thought to exert effects that alleviate the pathological features of NASH. One class of these drugs targets peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), which are nuclear receptors that play a regulatory role in lipid metabolism and inflammation. Therefore, PPARs are now also being investigated as potential anti-NASH druggable targets. In this paper, we review the mechanisms of action and physiological functions of PPARs and discuss the position of the different PPAR agonists in the therapeutic landscape of NASH. We particularly focus on the PPAR agonists currently under evaluation in clinical phase II and III trials. Preclinical strategies and how refinement and optimization may improve PPAR-targeted anti-NASH drug testing are also discussed. Finally, potential caveats related to PPAR agonism in anti-NASH therapy are stipulated. Full article

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptors that govern the expression of genes responsible for energy metabolism, cellular development, and differentiation. Their crucial biological roles dictate the significance of PPAR-targeting synthetic ligands in medical research and drug discovery. Clinical implications of PPAR agonists span across a wide range of health conditions, including metabolic diseases, chronic inflammatory diseases, infections, autoimmune diseases, neurological and psychiatric disorders, and malignancies. In this review we aim to consolidate existing clinical evidence of PPAR modulators, highlighting their clinical prospects and challenges. Findings from clinical trials revealed that different agonists of the same PPAR subtype could present different safety profiles and clinical outcomes in a disease-dependent manner. Pemafibrate, due to its high selectivity, is likely to replace other PPARα agonists for dyslipidemia and cardiovascular diseases. PPARγ agonist pioglitazone showed tremendous promises in many non-metabolic disorders like chronic kidney disease, depression, inflammation, and autoimmune diseases. The clinical niche of PPARβ/δ agonists is less well-explored. Interestingly, dual- or pan-PPAR agonists, namely chiglitazar, saroglitazar, elafibranor, and lanifibranor, are gaining momentum with their optimistic outcomes in many diseases including type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and primary biliary cholangitis. Notably, the preclinical and clinical development for PPAR antagonists remains unacceptably deficient. We anticipate the future design of better PPAR modulators with minimal off-target effects, high selectivity, superior bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics. This will open new possibilities for PPAR ligands in medicine. Full article