Search Results (12)

Background/Objectives: Standardized nursing terminologies (SNTs) have been associated with improved patient and organizational outcomes. This secondary analysis aims to examine how structured nursing assessment data and documentation are integrated into electronic health records (EHRs) in studies that report on the impact of American Nurses Association–recognized SNTs. Methods: Data were extracted from all 53 primary studies included in a previously published systematic review. The original literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and OpenGrey. Extracted data focused on nursing assessment tools, use of EHRs, inter-rater reliability, and methodological characteristics. Results: Gordon’s Eleven Functional Health Patterns was the most frequently used nursing assessment framework, often in combination with NANDA-I diagnoses. However, details regarding assessment tools and their application in EHRs were inconsistently reported. Only about one-third of the studies explicitly indicated the use of EHRs, though an upward trend in their use has been observed over the last decade. Inter-rater reliability was reported in a limited number of studies, with considerable variation. An overall increasing trend in the use of nursing assessment data in electronic health records was observed over the past decade. Conclusions: The integration of SNTs with structured assessment frameworks into EHRs is increasing but remains inconsistently reported. Standardized documentation practices could strengthen nursing visibility, support quality improvement, and enhance outcome measurement in both clinical and research contexts. Full article

Background/Objectives: Falls in hospitalized pediatric patients are frequent and can lead to serious complications and increased healthcare costs. Nurses typically assess fall risk using structured tools such as the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale (HDFS), alongside nursing diagnoses such as Fall risk ND, which are based on clinical reasoning. However, the degree of alignment between the HDFS and the nursing reasoning-based diagnostic approach in assessing fall risk remains unclear. This study aims to assess the alignment between the HDFS and Fall risk ND in identifying fall risk among hospitalized pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Italy, including all pediatric patients admitted in 2022. Fall risk was assessed within 24 h from hospital admission using two approaches, the HDFS (risk identified with the standard cutoff, score ≥ 12) and Fall risk ND, based on the nurse’s clinical reasoning and recorded through the PAIped clinical nursing information system. Discriminative performance was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. A confusion matrix evaluated classification performance at the cutoff (≥12). Results: Among 2086 inpatients, 80.9% had a recorded Fall risk ND. Of the 1853 patients assessed with the HDFS, 52.7% were classified as at risk (HDFS score ≥ 12). The HDFS showed low discriminative ability in detecting patients with a Fall risk ND (AUC = 0.568; 95% CI: 0.535−0.602). The PPV was high (85.1%), meaning that most patients identified as at risk by the HDFS were also judged to be at risk by nurses through Fall risk ND. However, the NPV was low (20.1%), indicating that many patients with low HDFS scores were still diagnosed with Fall risk ND by nurses. Conclusions: The HDFS shows limited ability to discriminate pediatric patients with Fall risk ND, capturing a risk profile that does not fully align with nursing clinical reasoning. This suggests that standardized tools and clinical reasoning address distinct yet complementary dimensions of fall risk assessment. Integrating the HDFS into a structured nursing diagnostic process—guided by clinical expertise and supported by continuous education—can strengthen the effectiveness of fall prevention strategies and enhance patient safety in pediatric settings. Full article

Background: Evidence-Based Nursing Practice (EBNP) plays a crucial role in ensuring high-quality patient care. This study evaluates master’s degree nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to EBNP, identifying strengths and key gaps that require curriculum improvements to enhance their competencies in evidence-based practice. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 103 master’s degree nursing students at Wrocław Medical University. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and the standardized Polish version of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2Q). Results: The findings indicate that students demonstrated generally positive attitudes toward EBNP (mean score: 53.43 ± 10.05 out of 70). However, knowledge of research terminology was moderate (44.66 ± 18.01 out of 85), and the frequency of EBNP utilization in practice was relatively low (22.15 ± 8.74 out of 45). Significant differences were observed based on study mode and academic progression, with part-time students scoring higher in attitudes toward competency development (p = 0.02). A weak but positive correlation was found between professional experience and the frequency of EBNP utilization (r = 0.182, p = 0.068), while knowledge of research terminology showed a non-significant association with age (r = 0.167, p = 0.092). Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for targeted curriculum enhancements, particularly in research literacy, practical application opportunities, and the integration of mentorship and educational resources. Strengthening EBNP education will better equip nursing students to implement evidence-based practices in clinical settings, ultimately improving patient care quality. Full article

Background/Objectives: The NANDA International, Inc., (NANDA-I) diagnostic classification is the most widely used standardized nursing language internationally. The EVALUAN-I tool was developed to evaluate the NANDA-I diagnostic classification. The aim was to analyze the use of the NANDA-I diagnostic classification among Spanish nurses and assess its correlation with sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish nurses working in clinical, management, and academic settings using the EVALUAN-I tool (September 2019–December 2020). The analysis was conducted using R^® (version 3.6.3, Lavaan package; R Core Team, 2020), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-190-1). Results: A total of 483 responses were obtained. There was a correlation between the intensity of use of NANDA-I and its application in practice (polychoric correlation = 0.50; p < 0.001). Nurses with a PhD degree considered nursing diagnoses to be less evidence-based (p = 0.037) but more useful (p = 0.035). Academic and research nurses stated that NANDA-I was more useful (p = 0.007), even for exclusive responsibilities (p = 0.034), and that it provided greater significance to diagnoses (p = 0.0012). Conclusions: NANDA-I is the most widely used standardized nursing language in Spain. Nurses’ academic qualifications and work environment significantly influence their perceptions and use of NANDA-I. Advanced education fosters a critical yet positive perspective, highlighting a relationship between the intensity of its use, its application in clinical practice, and the nurse’s educational background. Tools such as EVALUAN-I promote its integration and evidence-based practice, but challenges remain in improving perceptions, scientific evidence, and visibility in electronic health records to enhance its clinical impact and nursing recognition. Full article

Background/Objectives: The increasing medical and nursing care complexity in hospitalized children represents a significant challenge for healthcare systems. However, the link between these two dimensions remains partially explored. This study aims to decipher the relationship between Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) weight and nursing care complexity in hospitalized children and to identify the determinants of medical complexity. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted in an Italian university hospital, included children aged 2 to 11 years admitted to the hospital in 2022 with a minimum hospital stay of 2 days. Data were gathered from the Neonatal Pediatric Professional Assessment Instrument and the Hospital Discharge Register. DRG weight was used as an indicator of medical complexity, while the number of nursing diagnoses (NDs) documented in the first 24 h from hospital admission and the nursing actions (NAs) recorded during the patient’s hospital stay were used to measure nursing care complexity. Correlation analyses were conducted to explore the associations between DRG weight, NDs, and NAs. Stepwise regression was run to identify the key determinants of medical complexity across sociodemographic, clinical, organizational, and nursing variables. Results: Among 914 patients (mean age of 6.11 ± 2.90 years), the median DRG weight was 0.6982 (IQR: 0.5522). Patients had an average of 3.89 ± 2.83 NDs and a median of 17 NAs (IQR: 8). Significant correlations were found between NDs and NAs (r_s = 0.507; p < 0.001), as well as between DRG weight and the frequency of NDs (r_s = 0.232; p < 0.001) and NAs (r_s = 0.184; p < 0.001). Stepwise regression indicated that the number of NAs, surgical DRG, scheduled admissions, and ND frequency were significant determinants of DRG weight (R² = 0.311; adjusted R² = 0.308; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In children, DRG weight is also influenced by nursing care complexity, alongside clinical and organizational factors. An integrated approach is essential to enhance pediatric care and patient outcomes. Full article

Introduction: The advancement of nursing science and practice necessitates the documentation of information, which is increasingly being recorded in electronic mediums due to the progress of information technology. Various countries around the world have implemented electronic nursing records (ENRs) or are in the process of implementing them. This study aims to ascertain the significance of electronic nursing records and consolidate their primary benefits for nursing. Methods: The study utilized an established scoping review methodology (Arksey and O‘Malley protocol; JBI method; PRISMA ScR (2018)). Results: Out of 6970 initial articles extracted from four databases, 36 were included in the study. Several essential elements for structuring, introducing, and emphasizing the importance of ENRs have been recognized, including the availability of standardized terminology, enhancement of nursing care quality, advancement of research activity, integration with electronic systems, optimization of healthcare, and conditions for ENR integration. Conclusions: Electronic nursing records are indispensable and beneficial for enhancing care quality, improving patient safety, and affirming the autonomy of the nursing profession. Full article

(1) Background: Resilience has been presented as a potential protective factor to be promoted in difficult experiences in older people. However, further clarification of the concept of resilience for this population is required, as this is of critical interest for nursing care. (2) Aim: To develop the concept of resilience in older people to establish the elements that refer to the nursing outcome. Personal resilience (1309) from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), specifically in older people. (3) Methods: Concept analysis using Beth Rodgers’ evolutionary model. The attributes, antecedents, consequents, and empirical elements were described in the integrative review, with searches in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, and Embase databases. A total of 2431 citations have been identified, and 110 studies were included. (4) Results: The concept of “resilience in older people” is composed of two attributes, available resources and positive behaviors, and is defined as positive attitudes of older people with the assistance of resources available from experiences of adversity. Conclusion: This analysis and concept development of resilience in older people provided sensitive indicators for nursing care in the context of adversity, considering available resources and with positive attitudes during this phase of life span. Full article

The decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by nurses in informatized clinical records. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using the NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification in care practice to assess the association between the presence of the related/risk factors and the clinical decision-making about nursing diagnosis, assessing the effectiveness of nursing interventions and health outcomes, and increasing people’s satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline (OvidSP), Embase (Embase-Elsevier), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHOST), SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo (WOS), LILACS (Health Virtual Library) and SCOPUS (SCOPUS-Elsevier) and included randomized clinical trials as well as quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. A total of 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to the outcomes, 6 studies assessed diagnostic decision-making and 11 assessed improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies assessed improvements in intervention effectiveness or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address clinical decision-making about nursing diagnoses using NANDA International and individuals’ health outcomes using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification as well as implementing studies that assess the use of these terminologies for improvements in the effectiveness of nurses’ interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process. Full article

In the last few decades, the impact of chronic health conditions on health systems, as well as on the quality of life, frailty, and dependence of those affected, has been brought to light. The objective of this study was to describe the population care needs of highly complex chronic patients (HCCPs). Methods: An epidemiological observational study was conducted. Results: A total of 13,262 patients were identified, 51% of which were elderly women. Among all patients, 84.4% had received a nursing assessment related to health patterns. Three diagnoses were established in 25% of the sample: readiness for enhanced health management, impaired skin integrity, and risk for falls. There were significant differences according to age, most importantly in terms of impaired skin integrity (39% of patients under 80 years old). Risk for falls, social isolation, situational low self-esteem, chronic low self-esteem, impaired home maintenance, anxiety, ineffective health management, ineffective coping, impaired memory, insomnia, and self-care deficits were more common in those living alone. A total of 37 diagnoses featured differences according to frailty/dependence. Approximately 23% of HCCPs suffered from frail elderly syndrome. Conclusions: This study presents the most common care needs of HCCPs, describing the sociodemographic profile of this part of the population. The planning of HCCP care varies in nature. Factors such as the dependence level and frailty of these people should be taken into consideration. Full article

We conducted validation of a scale to measure nursing workloads, previously designed using NIC interventions within the four nursing functions (patient care, teaching, management, and research). Methods: This is an analytical, descriptive, prospective, and observational study using qualitative methodology (focus groups and in-depth interviews) with a quantitative and qualitative section (committee of experts and real application of the scale through a validation pilot and with multicentric application, including hospitalization units of internal medicine and surgery of four hospitals). Qualitative analysis was performed with Atlas.ti8 and quantitative analysis with R. Results: Qualitatively, all the participants agreed on the need to measure workloads in all nursing functions with standardized terminology. The expert committee found greater relevance (91.67%) in “prevention” and “health education” as well as consistency with the construct and adequate wording in 99% of the selected items. In the pilot test and multicenter application, the nurses spent more time on the caring dimension, in the morning shift, and on the items “self-care”, “medication”, “health education”, “care of invasive procedures”, “wounds care”, “comfort”, and “fluid therapy”. Cronbach’s alpha 0.727, composite reliability 0.685, AVE 0.099, and omega coefficient 0.704 were all acceptable. Construct validity: KMO 0.5 and Bartlett’s test were significant. Conclusions: The scale can be considered valid to measure nursing workloads, both qualitatively in obtaining the consensus of experts and health personnel and quantitatively, with acceptable reliability and validity superior to other similar scales. Full article

Background: The Nursing Interventions Classification allows the systematic organisation of care treatments performed by nurses, and an estimation of the time taken to carry out the intervention is included in its characteristics. The aim of this study is to explore the evidence related to the use of the Nursing Interventions Classification in identifying and measure nurses’ workloads. Methods: A scoping review was conducted through a search of the databases Ovid Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, LILACS and Cuiden. The DeCS/MeSH descriptors were: “Standardized Nursing terminology” and “Workload”. The search was limited to articles in Spanish, English and Portuguese. No limits were established regarding year of publication or type of study. Results: Few reports were identified (n = 8) and these had methodological designs that contributed low levels of evidence. Research was focused on identifying specific interventions, types of activities, the prevalence of interventions and the time required to perform them. Conclusions: The evidence found on determination of nurses’ workloads using the Nursing Interventions Classification was inconclusive. It is essential to increase the number of reports, as well as the settings and clinical context in which the Nursing Interventions Classification is used, with greater quality and methodological rigour. Full article

This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. The study consists of three stages: (i) Selection and definition of the component dimensions and areas, construction of items assessing these dimensions, administration instructions, and qualitative criteria for assigning diagnoses; (ii) Face validity and content validity; (iii) Pilot test. The tentative questionnaire was designed using two defining characteristics of the NANDA-I (“Impaired verbal communication” and “Readiness for enhanced communication”) and the NOC outcome indicators “Communication”, “Communication: Expressive”, “Communication: Receptive”, and “Information Processing”. The areas and items reached initial content validity index (CVI) and representativeness index (RI) values of 0.87 and above. Those that did not reach the expected values were modified after expert review. The resulting questionnaire was pilot-tested for feasibility and administration times. An instrument containing five dimensions, fourteen areas, and 43 items was obtained and administered in 15 (12–31) minutes. A panel of experts evaluated the final questionnaire (CEECCA), awarding its areas and items CVI and RI values of 0.90 and above. In the absence of further psychometric studies, the questionnaire appears to be useful for assessing ability to communicate in individuals with aphasia. Full article