Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = trademarked fruit names

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 2328 KB  
Review
Evaluating and Classifying Apple Brand Names: Criteria and Trends over a Century
by Jennifer Arthur and Masoumeh Bejaei
Horticulturae 2025, 11(2), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11020127 - 24 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2157
Abstract
Globally, fruit breeders and marketers create trademarked brand names for new varieties which can be protected indefinitely, extending returns on breeding investments. Brand names help promote and differentiate fruits, acting as quality signifiers and simplifying consumer choices. This study introduces brand name evaluation [...] Read more.
Globally, fruit breeders and marketers create trademarked brand names for new varieties which can be protected indefinitely, extending returns on breeding investments. Brand names help promote and differentiate fruits, acting as quality signifiers and simplifying consumer choices. This study introduces brand name evaluation criteria, identifies name classification frameworks, and audits North American and international apple names, covering plant varietal denominations and both trademarked and non-trademarked names. Key criteria for a good brand name include trademarkability, memorability (simplicity, distinctiveness, meaningfulness, sound associations, mental imagery, and emotional impact), and marketability (appropriate brand image and marketing support). Two modified frameworks were used to classify apple names. The audit revealed that the prevalence of using ‘Namesake’ names associated with ‘Real or Fictitious Persons/Places’ has significantly decreased (North America: 4.9 times since the 1920s). The use of ‘Compounding’ names has remained frequent (North America: 25% in the 2020s). Some categories have seen an increased usage as follows: ‘Product Unrelated—Metaphoric’ (North America: 17.5 times) and ‘Unusual Spellings’ (not recorded until the 1980s, recently 6%) names. Since the 1960s, the following categories have remained consistent: ‘Sensory’, ‘Product/Benefit Related’, ‘Product Unrelated—Non-Metaphoric’, and ‘Blending’ names. The findings support fruit and vegetable industries in distinguishing their products through effective brand naming. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 483 KB  
Review
The Process of Creating a New Brand Name for a Fruit Variety: A Review and Suggested Improvements
by Jennifer Arthur and Masoumeh Bejaei
Horticulturae 2022, 8(11), 990; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110990 - 25 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4026
Abstract
In an effort to protect intellectual property beyond patent and plant breeders’ rights and as a marketing tool to increase and maintain sales, the creation and trademarking of brand names for fruit is growing and gaining importance in the fruit industry. New fruit [...] Read more.
In an effort to protect intellectual property beyond patent and plant breeders’ rights and as a marketing tool to increase and maintain sales, the creation and trademarking of brand names for fruit is growing and gaining importance in the fruit industry. New fruit varietals, especially from long-lived tree fruits and vines, take many years of research to develop and bring to market. Differentiating what is essentially a commodity product is difficult, especially given bulk sales and packaging limitations. A distinctive brand name can be a powerful method of differentiating a new fruit from its competitors. To the best of our knowledge there has not been any study examining the process of brand name creation for fruits. This English language literature review examines the brand name creation process overall. A step-by-step process is discussed and situated in the context of fruits. Research on the overall process is dated: We propose a new preliminary research step to improve the process and discuss the need for future research on the role of the Internet and social media in the naming process. An overview of trademark considerations is provided. Knowledge of this process will assist breeders and marketers with brand name creation whether achieved internally or through an external agency or combination thereof. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop