Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Extracts from Salvia bicolor Desf. Growing in Egypt
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of 13-n-Alkyl Berberine and Palmatine Analogues as Anticancer Agents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 17
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules171011303
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Benzopyranones from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and Their Bioactivities

by
Xiangjie Meng
1,
Ziling Mao
1,
Jingfeng Lou
1,
Liang Xu
1,
Lingyun Zhong
1,
Youliang Peng
1,
Ligang Zhou
1,* and
Mingan Wang
2,*
1
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
College of Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2012, 17(10), 11303-11314; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules171011303
Submission received: 16 August 2012 / Revised: 4 September 2012 / Accepted: 19 September 2012 / Published: 25 September 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 was isolated from the hybrid ‘Neva’ of Populus deltoides Marsh × P. nigra L. In this study, four benzopyranones were isolated from the ethyl acetate extract of Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12, and identified as palmariol B (1), 4-hydroxymellein (2), alternariol 9-methyl ether (3), and botrallin (4) by means of physicochemical and spectroscopic analysis. All the compounds were evaluated for their antibacterial, antifungal, antinematodal and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities. 4-Hydroxymellein (2) exhibited stronger antibacterial activity than the other compounds. Palmariol B (1) showed stronger antimicrobial, antinematodal and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities than alternariol 9-methyl ether (3) which indicated that the chlorine substitution at position 2 may contribute to its bioactivity. The results indicate the potential of this endophytic fungus as a source of bioactive benzopyranones.

1. Introduction

Endophytic fungi which inhabit normal tissues of host plants without causing apparent symptoms of pathogenesis are novel and rich sources of bioactive natural products which include alkaloids, amines, amides, steroids, terpenoids, isocoumarins, quinines, flavonoids, phenyl propanoids, lignans, phenols, aliphatics, etc. [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Due to this extensive potential, the objective of this work was to investigate the bioactive metabolites from an endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 isolated from the healthy stems of the ‘Neva’ hybrid of Populus deltoides Marsh × P. nigra L. One benzopyranone that showed antimicrobial activity was previously obtained from this source and identified as botrallin [7]. In this work, three other benzopyranones were isolated for the first time from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12, identified, and their bioactivities, including antibacterial, antifungal, acetylcholinesterase inhibitory, and antinematodal properties, evaluated in order to provide data supporting the development and utilization of Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Elucidation of the Purified Benzopyranones

Four compounds were isolated and purified from the crude ethyl acetate extract of the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. Their chemical structures were elucidated based on the physicochemical properties and spectral data, as well as by comparison of the properties and spectral characteristics with those in the literature. They were all known compounds, confirmed as 2-chloro-3,7-dihydroxy-9-methoxy-1-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one (=palmariol B, 1) [8], 4,8-dihydroxy-3-methylbenzopyran-1-one (=4-hydroxymellein, 2) [9], 3,7-dihydroxy-9-methoxy-1-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one (=alternariol 9-methyl ether, 3) [10,11,12,13], and 1,7-dihydroxy-3,9-dimethoxy-4a-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-2,6 (4aH)- dione (=botrallin, 4) [14,15], respectively (Figure 1). Compounds 1–3 were isolated for the first time from the fungus Hyalodendriella sp. while the presence of compound 4 in this fungal strain was previously reported [7]. All these compounds belong to the class of benzopyranones with an isocoumarin skeleton.
Palmariol B (1) should derive from alternariol 9-methyl ether (3) by a chlorine substitution at position 2 (Figure 1). It was first isolated from the fungus Lachnum palmae derived from the decaying leaves of Livistona sp. [8]. This is the second time that palmariol B (1) was isolated from fungi. 4-Hydroxymellein (2) has been isolated from many fungi such as Ascochyta sp. [16], Botryosphaeria mamane [17], Botryosphaeria obtusa [9,18], Botryosphaeria rhodina [19], Cercospora taiwanensis [20], Dinemasporium strigosum [21], Emericellopsis minima [22], Lasiodiplodia theobromae [23], Meliotus dentatus [24], Penicillium sp. [25], Seimatosporium sp. [26], and Septoria nodorum [27]. Alternariol 9-methyl ether (3) has been isolated from some fungi such as Alternaria brassicicola [12], and Lachnum palmae [8]. Botrallin (4) was firstly isolated from the fungus Botrytis allii [14], and later it was isolated from the endophytic fungus Microsphaeropsis olivacea associated with a Chilean cupressaceous plant Pilgerodendron uviferum [15].
Molecules 17 11303 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the benzopyranones 1–4.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the benzopyranones 1–4.
Molecules 17 11303 g001

2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

Antimicrobial activities of the compounds with their median inhibitory concentration (IC50) values are shown in Table 1. The IC50 values of the compounds on Agrobacterium tumefaciens ranged from 18.22 μg/mL to 87.52 μg/mL. Those on Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas lachrymans, Ralstonia solanacearum, Xanthomonas vesicatoria, Magnaporthe oryzae ranged from 19.22 μg/mL to 98.47 μg/mL, 16.18 μg/mL to 92.21 μg/mL, 16.24 μg/mL to 85.46 μg/mL, 17.81 μg/mL to 86.32 μg/mL, 107.19 μg/mL to 123.19 μg/mL, respectively. On each microorganism, palmariol B (1) showed stronger antimicrobial activity than alternariol 9-methyl ether (3), which suggested that the chlorine substitution at position 2 may contribute to its antimicrobial activity. 4-Hydroxymellein (2) exhibited stronger antibacterial activity than the other compounds (i.e., 1, 3 and 4). Botrallin (4) exhibited relatively weaker antibacterial and stronger antifungal activity than the other compounds. Furthermore, the antibacterial activity results of the compounds were better than those for their antifungal activity. Taken together the results indicate the potential of the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 as a source of antimicrobial agents.
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity (IC50) of the benzopyranones.
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity (IC50) of the benzopyranones.
Compd.IC50 (μg/mL)
A. tum.B. sub.P. lach.R. sol.X. ves.M. or.
Palmariol B (1)19.3527.6716.7417.5128.11118.72
4-Hydroxymellein (2)18.2219.2216.1816.2417.81113.40
Alternariol 9-methyl ether (3)28.8334.2927.0829.2130.06123.19
Botrallin (4)87.5298.4792.2185.4686.32107.19
CK+6.348.358.347.196.7913.01
Note: IC50, median inhibitory concentration; A. tum. = Agrobacterium tumefaciens; B. sub. = Bacillus subtilis; P. lach. = Pseudomonas lachrymans; R. sol. = Ralstonia solanacearum; X. ves. = Xanthomonas vesicatoria; M. or. = Magnaporthe oryzae; Positive controls for bacteria and fungus (M. oryzae) were streptomycin sulfate and carbendazim, respectively.
4-Hydroxymellein (2) from the endophytic fungus Penicillium sp. was reported to exhibit antifungal activity on Cladosporium cladosporioides and C. sphaerospermum at 5.00 μg/mL and 10.0 μg/mL, respectively [25] as well as antibacterial activity on Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus with the equal MIC values of 8 μg/mL [17]. 4-Hydroxymellein (2) from the endophytic fungus Meliotus dentatus also showed strong antibacterial activity on Bacillus megaterium and antifungal activity on Microbotryum violacerum [24]. Alternariol 9-methyl ether (3) is a major mycotoxin produced by fungi of the genus Alternaria [28]. It can induce mitochondrial apoptosis in human colon carcinoma cells [29], and induce DNA strand breaks, micronuclei and gene mutations in various cultured mammalian cells [30]. Botrallin (4) was reported to show antifungal activity on the fungus Alternaria alternata with its MIC value as 62.5 μg/mL [15].

2.3. Antinematodal and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activities

Antinematodal activity on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of the benzopyranones obtained by using the microplate assay expressed as the median inhibitory concentration (IC50) values are given in Table 2. The IC50 values of the antinematodal activity of the compounds ranged from 56.21 μg/mL to 93.99 μg/mL, and those for the acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitory activity ranged from 103.70 μg/mL to 135.52 μg/mL. Palmariol B showed stronger antinematodal and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities than alternariol 9-methyl ether. Botrallin (4) was previously reported to have acetycholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity with the IC50 value as 6.1 μg/mL [15]. The results indicate that the benzopyranones from the endophyte Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 have potential as antinematodal and insecticidal agents.
Table
Table 2. Antinematodal activity on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of the benzopyranones.
Table 2. Antinematodal activity on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of the benzopyranones.
Compd.IC50 (μg/mL)
Antinematodal activity on C. elegansAcetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity
Palmariol B ( 1)56.21115.31
4-Hydroxymellein ( 2)86.86116.05
Alternariol 9-methyl ether ( 3)93.99135.52
Botrallin ( 4)84.51103.70
CK+3.707.41
Note: IC50, median inhibitory concentration; Positive controls (CK+) for antinematodal and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities were avermectin and 9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine hydrochloride hydrate, respectively.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

Melting points of the compounds were measured on an XT4-100B microscopic melting-point apparatus (Tianjin Tianguang Optical Instruments Company, Tianjin, China) and are uncorrected. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance DRX-400 spectrometer (1H at 400 MHz and 13C at 100 MHz) using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard, and chemical shifts were recorded as δ values. ESI-MS spectra were recorded on a Bruker Esquire 6000 LC/MS spectrometer and a Bruker Apex IV FTMS spectrometer. Both silica gel (200–300 mesh) for column chromatography (CC) and silica gel GF254 (10–20 mm) for thin layer chromatography (TLC) were acquired from the Qingdao Marine Chemical Company (Qingdao, China). Sephadex LH-20 was purchased from Pharmacia Biotech (Stockholm, Sweden). A microplate spectrophotometer (PowerWave HT, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) was employed to measure the light absorption value. Carbendazim, streptomycin sulfate, 9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine hydrochloride hydrate, acetylthiocholine iodide (ATCI), 5,5'-dithio bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-dephenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was purchased from Amresco (Solon, OH, USA). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade.

3.2. Endophytic Fungus and Fermentation

The endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 (GenBank accession number HQ731647) was isolated from the healthy stems of the ‘Neva’ hybrid of Populus deltoides Marsh × P. nigra L. in our previous study [31]. It was stored both on PDA slants at 4 °C and in 40% glycerol at −70 °C in the Herbarium of the College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University (Beijing, China). The fungus was cultured on PDA (potato 200 g/L, dextrose 20 g/L and agar 20 g/L) medium in Petri dishes at 25 °C for 10 days. For seed culture, two to three plugs of agar medium (0.5 × 0.5 cm) with fungal cultures were inoculated in each 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL potato dextrose broth (PDB) medium, and incubated on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm and 25 °C for 5 days. For fermentation culture, about 50 mycelium pellets were inoculated in each 1,000-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 300 mL PDB medium, and incubated on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm and 25 °C for 20 days. Afterwards, a total of 90 L fermentation broth was harvested.

3.3. Extraction and Fractionation of the Compounds

The mycelia separated from the culture filtrate by filtration was lyophilized and ground to obtain 800 g of mycelia powder. This material was extracted with acetone (5 × 2 L). After filtration, the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum at 50 °C, the brown residue was suspended in water (1 L) and fractioned successively with petroleum ether (3 × 2 L), ethyl acetate (3 × 2 L) and n-butanol (3 × 2 L), to give their corresponding fractions. Meanwhile, the culture filtrate was concentrated to 1 L and fractionated with petroleum ether (3 × 2 L), ethyl acetate (3 × 2 L) and n-butanol (3 × 2 L), successively to obtain the respective fraction. As the results of TLC and TLC-bioautographic-assays were similar to each other for the ethyl acetate fractions from the mycelia and culture filtrate, both the ethyl acetate fractions were combined, and a total of 37.8 g concentrated crude ethyl acetate fraction was thus obtained.
The crude ethyl acetate fraction was firstly subjected to column chromatography (CC) over silica gel (200–300 mesh) eluted with CH2Cl2/MeOH (15:1, v/v) to obtain eight fractions (FA, FB, FC, FD, FE, FF, FG and FH) as monitored by TLC. Fraction FD was screened to show strong antimicrobial activity, and it was selected for further separation of the compounds on a silica gel column eluted with petroleum ether/CH2Cl2/MeOH (from 1:0:0 to 0:0:1, v/v) to give four subfractions. Subfraction FD-1 was purified by recrystalization to afford 1 (18 mg). FD-2 was purified by Sephadex LH-20 (CHCl3/MeOH = 1:1, v/v) and recrystalization to afford 2 (12 mg). FD-3 was further fractionated on a silica gel column eluted with CH2Cl2/MeOH (from 1:0 to 0:1, v/v), and purified by Sephadex LH-20 (CHCl3/MeOH = 1:1, v/v) and recrystalization to afford 3 (28 mg). FD-4 was purified by Sephadex LH-20 (CHCl3/MeOH = 1:1, v/v) and recrystalization to afford 4 (43 mg).

3.4. Physicochemical and Spectroscopic Data of the Benzopyranones

Compound 1 was isolated as a white amorphous powder (MeOH); m.p. 270–276 °C; UV (MeOH), λmax 218, 257 nm; ESI-MS m/z 304.8 [M−H]−; The molecular formula C15H11ClO5 was assigned by HR-ESI-MS m/z 344.9927 [M+K]+ (calcd. 344.9932); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.79 (3H, s, CH3-1), 11.14 (1H, s, OH-3), 6.83 (1H, s, H-4), 11.64 (1H, s, OH-7), 6.61 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, H-8), 3.90 (3H, s, OCH3-9), 7.15 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, H-10); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 135.48 (C-1), 20.9 (CH3-1), 119.86 (C-2), 154.65 (C-3), 101.88 (C-4), 150.11 (C-4a), 163.96 (C-6), 98.59 (C-6a), 164.19 (C-7), 98.89 (C-8), 166.01 (C-9), 55.93 (OCH3-9), 104.50 (C-10), 136.87 (C-10a), 110.31 (C-10b). Those data were consistent with literature [8]. Therefore, compound 1 was identified as 2-chloro-3,7-dihydroxy-9-methoxy-1-methyl-6H-dibenzo [b,d] pyran-6-one, named palmariol B.
Compound 2 was isolated as white dendrite-like crystals (MeOH); m.p. 110–114 °C; UV (MeOH), λmax 246, 314 nm; The molecular formula C10H10O4 was assigned by HR-ESI-MS m/z 193.0507 [M−H]− (calcd. 193.0501); 1H-NMR (CD3OD) δ (ppm): 4.56 (1H, m, H-3), 1.47 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH3-3), 4.54 (1H, d, J = 3.6 Hz, H-4), 7.08 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H-5), 7.57 (1H, t, J = 8.4, 7.4 Hz, H-6), 6.93 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-7), 13C-NMR (CD3OD) δ (ppm): 170.19 (C-1), 81.61 (C-3), 18.17 (CH3-3), 69.52 (C-4), 144.13 (C-4a), 117.71 (C-5), 137.80 (C-6), 117.80 (C-7), 162.89 (C-8), 108.01 (C-8a). Those data were consistent with literature [9,20]. Thus, compound 2 was identified as 4,8-dihydroxy-3-methylbenzopyran-1-one, named 4-hydroxymellein.
Compound 3 was isolated as a yellow amorphous powder (MeOH); m.p. 265–269 °C; UV (MeOH), λmax 204, 256 nm; The molecular formula C15H12O5 was assigned by HR-ESI-MS m/z 273.0755 [M+H]+ (calcd. 273.0763); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.73 (3H, s, CH3-1), 6.72 (1H, d, J = 2.6 Hz, H-2), 11.34 (1H, s, OH-3), 6.64 (1H, d, J = 2.6 Hz, H-4), 11.82 (1H, s, OH-7), 6.61(1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, H-8), 3.90 (3H, s, OCH3-9), 7.21 (1H, d, J = 2.6 Hz, H-10); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 138.45 (C-1), 25.03 (CH3-1), 117.61 (C-2), 158.59 (C-3), 101.64 (C-4), 152.64 (C-4a), 164.69 (C-6), 98.47 (C-6a), 164.14 (C-7), 99.17 (C-8), 166.17 (C-9), 55.84 (OCH3-9), 103.41 (C-10), 137.79 (C-10a), 108.81 (C-10b). Those data were consistent with literature [10,11,12,13]. Thus, compound 3 was identified as 3,7-dihydroxy-9-methoxy-1-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one, named alternariol 9-methyl ether.
Compound 4 was isolated as yellow needle-like crystals (MeOH); m.p. 223–237 °C; UV (MeOH), λmax 234 nm; The molecular formula C16H14O7 was assigned by HR-ESI-MS m/z 319.0814 [M+H]+ (calcd. 319.0813); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 6.25 (1H, s, OH-1), 3.67 (3H, s, OCH3-3), 6.17 (1H, s, H-4), 1.69 (3H, s, CH3-4a), 11.35 (1H, s, OH-7), 6.84 (1H, d, J = 2.36 Hz, H-8), 3.92 (3H, s, OCH3-9), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 2.36 Hz, H-10); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 141.6 (C-1), 172.1 (C-2), 146.8 (C-3), 55.1 (OCH3-3), 125.1 (C-4), 68.5 (C-4a), 29.2 (CH3-4a), 163.6 (C-6), 101.1 (C-6a), 163.5 (C-7), 102.5 (C-8), 165.9 (C-9), 56.2 (OCH3-9), 106.9 (C-10), 135.1 (C-10a), 130.0 (C-10b). After comparing the data with those reported in the literature [14,15], compound 4 was identified as 1,7-dihydroxy-3,9-dimethoxy-4a-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-2,6-(4aH)- dione, named botrallin.

3.5. Antibacterial Activity Assay

One Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis ATCC 11562), and four Gram-negative (Agrobacterium tumefaciens ATCC 11158, Pseudomonas lachrymans ATCC 11921, Ralstonia solanacearum ATCC 11696 and Xanthomonas vesicatoria ATCC 11633) bacteria were selected for the antibacterial activity assay. They were grown in liquid LB medium (yeast extract 5 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, NaCl 5 g/L, pH 7.0) overnight at 28 °C, and the diluted bacterial suspension (106 cfu/mL) was ready for detection. A modified broth dilution-colorimetric assay using the chromogenic reagent 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was used to detect the antibacterial activity of the benzopyranones [32]. Briefly, each compound was dissolved in 30% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at an initial concentration of 2.5 mg/mL. This was diluted with 30% DMSO to obtain a series of concentrations ranging from 0.03125 mg/mL to 2.5 mg/mL. Test sample solutions (10 μL) and prepared bacterial suspensions (90 μL) containing 1 × 106 cfu/mL were added into each well of the 96-well microplate. The negative control well contained 90 μL of the inoculum (1 × 106 cfu/mL) and 10 μL of 30% DMSO. Streptomycin sulfate was used as the positive control. After the plates were agitated to mix the contents of the wells using a plate shaker and incubated in the dark for 24 h at 28 °C, 10 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL in 0.2 mol/L, pH 7.2 phosphate-buffered saline) was added into each well, and the plates were incubated for another 4 h. The microplates incubated with MTT were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for another 20 min. Then the supernatant was aspirated, 200 μL of DMSO was added into each well, and the colored formazan products were extracted for 30 min using a plate shaker. After complete extraction, the plate was centrifuged at 1,500 × g for another 20 min, and then 100 μL of the supernatant (DMSO solution) in each well was transferred to a corresponding well of another 96-well microplate to measure their light absorption values at 510 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer (PowerWave HT, BioTek Instruments, USA). The percentage (%) of bacterial growth inhibition was determined by the formula:
Molecules 17 11303 i001
where Ac was an average of six replicates of the light absorption at 510 nm of the negative controls, and At was an average of six replicates of the light absorption at 510 nm of the samples. The median inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated using the linear relation between the inhibitory probability and concentration logarithm [33].

3.6. Antifungal Activity Assay

Rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae P131) was maintained on oatmeal-tomato agar (oatmeal 30 g/L, tomato juice 150 mL/L, and agar 20 g/L) at 25 °C. A spore germination assay was employed to detect the antifungal activity of the compounds [34]. Briefly, the spores were prepared from 7-day-old cultures of M. oryzae, according to our previous reports [35,36]. The test compound-acetone solution (25 µL) was mixed with an equivalent volume of fungal spore suspension containing 2 × 106 spores/mL. The mixture was then placed on separate concave glass slides. The final compound concentrations ranged from 3.125 µg/mL to 250 µg/mL in 5% (v/v) acetone. The negative control was 5% acetone, and the positive control was carbendazim with a series of concentrations ranging from 0.78 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL. Three replicates were used for each treatment. The slides containing the spores were incubated in a moist chamber at 25 °C for 7 h. Each slide was then observed under the microscope for observing spore germination status. About 100 spores per replicate were observed to detect spore germination according to the method by Fiori et al. [37]. The percentage of spore germination inhibition was determined by the expression:
Molecules 17 11303 i002
where Gc is an average of three replicates of germinated spore number in the negative control, and Gt is an average of three replicates of germinated numbers in the treated sets. The IC50 value calculation for the spore germination inhibition was the same as that for antibacterial activity assay.

3.7. Antinematodal Activity Assay

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which was kindly supplied by Dr. Yuanmei Zuo at the College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, was inoculated on the nematode growth medium (NGM) that was cultured previously with Escherichia coli OP50according to methods of Steiemagle [38]. The NGM plate was full of the worms after 4 to 5 days at 16 °C in darkness. In order to determine the IC50 values of the compounds, 5% acetone-water solutions of each sample at 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL were assayed for antinematodal activity. The test nematode dilution (90 μL containing 40–50 nematodes) was added into each well of the sterile 96-well microplate and then, 10 μL of sample stock solution was added into each well and mixed thoroughly. 5% acetone-water solution was used as the negative control. Avemectin B1, which was kindly provided by Dr. Shankui Yuan at the Institute for the Control of Agrochemicals, Chinese Ministry of Agriculture, was used as the positive control with the purity of 97.2%. It was a mixture of avermectin B1a and avermectin B1b in the ratio of 9.5 to 0.5 (w/w). Five replicates were carried out for each treatment, and the experiments were repeated twice. Dead and active nematodes were counted after 24 h. The nematodes were considered to be dead when they did not move by treating with a fine needle as the physical stimuli [39]. The mean percentage of mortality was then calculated. The net percentage of mortality was about 3% by using 5% acetone-water solution as the negative control after 24 h. Nematode recovery was not observed to the dead nematodes. The IC50 value calculation for the antinematodal activity was the same as that for antibacterial activity assay.

3.8. Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity Assay

Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) by the isolated compounds was investigated using the microplate assay. The assay was based on Ellman’s method [40] using a microplate spectrophotometer (PowerWave HT) with some modifications. In the 96-well plates, 160 μL of pH 7.7 phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution, 10 μL of 1.0 U/mL enzyme (AChE) solution, 10 μL of DTNB solution, 10 μL of a serially diluted solutions of the isolated compounds, and 9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine hydrochloride hydrate as the positive control were added. After the mixture was maintained at 30 °C for 15 min, 10 μL of 10 mM ATCI in pH 7.7 PBS solution was added. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm after a period of 30 min incubation. pH 7.7 PBS solution was used as the negative control. The percentage (%) of acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity was determined using the following expression:
Molecules 17 11303 i003
where Bc was an average of six replicates of the light absorption at 405 nm of the negative controls, and Bt was an average of six replicates of the light absorption at 405 nm of the samples. The IC50 value calculation for the acetylcholinesterase activity was the same as that for antibacterial activity assay.

4. Conclusions

In this work, four benzopyranones were isolated from the ethyl acetate fraction of the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. They were identified as palmariol B (1), 4-hydroxymellein (2), alternariol 9-methyl ether (3), and botrallin (4) by means of physicochemical and spectroscopic analysis. The benzopyranones 1, 2 and 3 were isolated from Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 for the first time. All the isolated benzopyranones showed antibacterial, antifungal, antinematodal and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the bioactivity of palmariol B (1), as well as the antinematodal and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities of the compounds 1, 2, and 3. It is also the first report on the antimicrobial activity of alternariol 9-methyl ether (3). The results indicate the potential of the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 as a source of active benzopyranones. Some issues such as the mechanisms of action of these benzopyranones, the physiological and ecological roles of the fungus, isolation of the other active compounds including halogen-containing benzopyranones from this fungus, and efficient strategies for increasing benzopyranone content and yield in fermentation culture of Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 need to be further investigated.

Acknowledgements

This work was co-financed by the grants from the program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China (IRT1042), and the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB126105).
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the benzopyranones are available from the authors.

References

  1. Aly, A.H.; Debbab, A.; Kjer, J.; Proksch, P. Fungal endophytes from higher plants: a prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products. Fungal Divers. 2010, 41, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tan, R.X.; Zou, W.X. Endophytes: A rich source of functional metabolites. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2001, 18, 448–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schulz, B.; Boyle, C.; Draeger, S.; Rommert, A.K.; Krohn, K. Endophytic fungi: A source of novel biologically active secondary metabolites. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Strobel, G.; Daisy, B.; Castillo, U.; Harper, J. Natural products from endophytic microorganisms. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kharwar, R.N.; Mishra, A.; Gond, S.K.; Stierle, A.; Stierle, D. Anticancer compounds derived from fungal endophytes: Their importance and future challenges. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 1208–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, J.; Shan, T.; Mou, Y.; Zhou, L. Plant-derived bioactive compounds produced by endophytic fungi. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhong, L.; Xu, L.; Meng, X.; Peng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Sui, P.; Wang, M.; Zhou, L. Botrallin from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and its antimicrobial activity. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 18174–18178. [Google Scholar]
  8. Matumoto, T.; Hosoya, T.; Shigemori, H. Palmariols A and B, two new chlorinated dibenzo-α-pyranones from Discomycete Lachnum palmae. Heterocycles 2010, 81, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Djoukeng, J.D.; Polli, S.; Larignon, P.; Abou-Mansour, E. Identification of phytotoxins from Botryosphaeria obtusa, a pathogen of black dead arm disease of grapevine. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 124, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nielsen, K.F.; Smedsgaard, J. Fungal metabolite screening: database of 474 mycotoxins and fungal metabolites for dereplication by standardised liquid chromatography-UV-mass spectrometry methodology. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1002, 111–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tan, N.; Tao, Y.; Pan, J.; Wang, S.; Xu, F.; She, Z.; Lin, Y.; Jones, E.B.G. Isolation, Structure elucidation, and Mutagenicity of four alternariol derivatives produced by the mangrove endophytic fungus No. 2240. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2008, 44, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gu, W. Bioactive metabolites from Alternaria brassicicola ML-P08, An endophytic fungus residing in Malus halliana. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 1677–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kjer, J.; Wray, V.; Edrada-Ebel, R.; Ebel, R.; Pretsch, A.; Lin, W.; Proksch, P. Xanalteric acids I and II and related phenolic compounds from an endophytic Alternaria sp. isolated from the magrove plant Sonneratia alba. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 2053–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kameda, K.; Aoki, H.; Namiki, M. An alternative structure for botrallin a metabolite of Botrytis allii. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 1, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hormazabal, E.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G.; Astudillo, L.; Rodriguez, J.; Theoduloz, C. Metabolites from Microsphaeropsis olivacea, an endophytic fungus of Pilgerodendron uviferum. Z. Naturforsch. 2005, 60, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  16. Krohn, K.; Kock, I.; Elsasser, B.; Florke, U.; Schulz, B.; Draeger, S.; Pescitelli, G.; Antus, S.; Kurtan, T. Bioactive natural products from the endophytic fungus Ascochyta sp. form Melitotus dentatus—configurational assignment by solid-state CD and TDDFT calculations. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pongcharoen, W.; Rukachaisirikul, V.; Phongpaichit, S.; Sakayaroj, J. A new dihycrobenzofuran derivative from the endophytic fungus Botryosphaeria mamane PSU-M76. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 1404–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Venkatasubbaiah, P.; Chilton, W.S. Phytotoxins of Botryosphaeria obtusa. J. Nat. Prod. 1990, 53, 1628–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rukachaisirikul, V.; Arunpanichlert, J.; Sukpondma, Y.; Phongpaichit, S.; Sakayaroj, J. Metabolites from the endophytic fungi Botryosphaeria rhodina PSU-M35 and PSU-M114. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10590–10595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Camarda, L.; Merlini, L.; Nasini, G. Metabolites of Cercospora. Taiwapyrone, an α-pyrone of unusual structure from Cercospora taiwanensis. Phytochemistry 1976, 15, 537–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krohn, K.; Sohrab, M.H.; van Ree, T.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B.; Antus, S.; Kurtin, T. Biologically active secondary metabolites from fungi, 39. Dinemasones A, B and C: New bioactive metabolites from the endophytic fungus Dinemasporium strigosum. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 33, 5638–5646. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pinheiro, A.; Dethoup, T.; Bessa, J.; Silva, A.M.S.; Kijjoa, A. A new bicyclic sesquiterpene from the marine sponge associated fungus Emericellopsis minima. Phytochem. Lett. 2012, 5, 68–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nunes, F.M.; Oliveira, M.C.F.; Arriaga, A.M.C.; Lemos, T.L.G.; Andrade-Neto, M.; Mattos, M.C.; Mafezoli, J.; Viana, F.M.P.; Ferreira, V.M.; Rodrigues-Filho, E.; et al. A new eremophilane-type sesquiterpene from the phytopathogen fungus Lasiodiplodia therobromae (Sphaeropsidaceae). J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2008, 19, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hussain, H.; Krohn, K.; Draeger, S.; Meier, K.; Schulz, B. Bioactive chemical constituents of a sterile endophytic fungus from Meliotus dentatus. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2009, 3, 114–117. [Google Scholar]
  25. Oliveira, C.M.; Silva, G.H.; Regasini, L.O.; Zanardi, L.M.; Evangelista, A.H.; Young, M.C.M.; Bolzani, V.S.; Araujo, A.R. Bioactive metabolites produced by Penicillium sp.1 and sp.2, Two endophytes associated with Alibertia macrophylla (Rubiaceae). Z. Naturforsch. 2009, 64, 824–830. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hussain, H.; Krohn, K.; Schulz, B.; Draeger, S.; Nazir, M.; Saleem, M. Two new antimicrobial metabolites from the endophytic fungus, Seimatosporium sp. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 293–294. [Google Scholar]
  27. Devys, M.; Bousquet, J.F.; Kollmann, A.; Barbier, M. Dihydroisocoumarines et acide mycophenolique du milieu de culture du champignon phytopathogene Septoria nodorum. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 2221–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pfeiffer, E.; Schebb, N.H.; Podlech, J.; Metzler, M. Novel oxidative in vitro metabolites of the mycotoxins alternariol and alternariol methyl ether. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bensassi, F.; Gallerne, C.; Sharafeldein, O.; Hajlaoui, M.R.; Bacha, H.; Lemaire, C. Mechanism of alternariol monomethyl ether-induced mitochondrial apoptosis in human colon carcinoma cells. Toxicology 2011, 290, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pfeiffer, E.; Eschbach, S.; Metzler, M. Alternaria toxins: DNA strand-breaking activity in mammalian cells in vitro. Mycotoxin Res. 2007, 23, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, S.; Xu, L.; Zhao, J.; Shan, T.; He, W.; Zhou, L. Endophytic fungi from the hybrid ‘Neva’ of Populus deltoides Marsh × P. nigra L. and their antimicrobial activity. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 3924–3929. [Google Scholar]
  32. Langfied, R.D.; Scarano, F.J.; Heitzman, M.E.; Kondo, M.; Hammond, G.B.; Neto, C.C. Use of a modified microplate bioassay method to investigate antibacterial activity in the Peruvian medicinal plant Peperomia galioides. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 94, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sakuma, M. Probit analysis of preference data. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1998, 33, 339–347. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhao, J.; Mou, Y.; Shan, T.; Li, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, J. Antimicrobial metabolites from the endophytic fungus Pichia guilliermondii isoalted from Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Molecules 2010, 15, 7961–7970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Lu, S.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, L. Isoquinoline alkaloids from Macleaya cordata active against plant microbial pathogens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 1557–1560. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Han, J.; Yu, Z.; Yang, F. Chemical analysis and biological activity of the essential oils of two valerianaceous species from China: Nardostachys chinensis and Valeriana officinalis. Molecules 2010, 15, 6411–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fiori, A.C.G.; Schwan-Estrada, K.R.F.; Stangarlin, J.R.; Vida, J.B.; Scapim, C.A.; Cruz, M.E.S.; Pascholati, S.F. Antifungal activity of leaf extracts and essential oils of some medicinal plants against Didymella bryoniae. J. Phytopathol. 2000, 148, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Steiernagle, T. Maintenance of C. elegans. In C. elegans: A Practical Approach; Hope, I., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999; pp. 51–67. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hong, L.; Li, G.; Zhou, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, K. Screening and isolation of a nematicidal sesquiterpene from Magnolia grandiflora. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V.J.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinestrase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, X.; Mao, Z.; Lou, J.; Xu, L.; Zhong, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M. Benzopyranones from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and Their Bioactivities. Molecules 2012, 17, 11303-11314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules171011303

AMA Style

Meng X, Mao Z, Lou J, Xu L, Zhong L, Peng Y, Zhou L, Wang M. Benzopyranones from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and Their Bioactivities. Molecules. 2012; 17(10):11303-11314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules171011303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Xiangjie, Ziling Mao, Jingfeng Lou, Liang Xu, Lingyun Zhong, Youliang Peng, Ligang Zhou, and Mingan Wang. 2012. "Benzopyranones from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and Their Bioactivities" Molecules 17, no. 10: 11303-11314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules171011303

APA Style

Meng, X., Mao, Z., Lou, J., Xu, L., Zhong, L., Peng, Y., Zhou, L., & Wang, M. (2012). Benzopyranones from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and Their Bioactivities. Molecules, 17(10), 11303-11314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules171011303

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop