Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 2-Phenoxyacetamide Analogues, a Novel Class of Potent and Selective Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors

Abstract

Monoamine oxidases (EC 1.4.3.4; MAOs), a family of FAD-containing enzymes, is an important target for antidepressant drugs. In this paper, a series of 2-phenoxyacetamide analogues were synthesized, and their inhibitory potency towards monoamine oxidases A (MAO-A) and B (MAO-B) were evaluated using enzyme and cancer cell lysate. 2-(4-Methoxyphenoxy)acetamide (compound 12) (SI = 245) and (2-(4-((prop-2-ynylimino)methyl)phenoxy)acetamide (compound 21) (IC_50MAO-A = 0.018 μM, IC_50MAO-B = 0.07 μM) were successfully identified as the most specific MAO-A inhibitor, and the most potent MAO-A/-B inhibitor, respectively. The inhibitory activities of these two compounds in living cells were also further evaluated utilizing HepG2 and SHSY-5Y cell lysates.

1. Introduction

Monoamine oxidases (EC 1.4.3.4; MAOs) are FAD-containing enzymes that bind tightly to the outer mitochondrial membrane in the brain, liver, intestinal mucosa, and other organs and catalyze the oxidative deamination of biogenic and xenobiotic amines. There are two types of isoenzymes, MAO-A and MAO-B, which can be distinguished by their differential substrates, inhibitor selectivity, tissue distribution, and primary DNA sequences [1]. MAO-A is located predominantly in catecholaminergic neurons, while MAO-B is present in serotonergic neurons and glia. MAO-A catalyzes the oxidation of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and norephinephrine, whereas MAO-B deaminates dopamine and 2-phenylethylamine (2-PEA). Recent studies have shown that MAOs are important target enzymes for antidepressant drugs [2]. In addition, the biotransformation of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) into 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) mediated by MAO-B results in the neurodegenerative symptoms of the Parkinsonism [3]. Therefore, the study of MAO inhibitors has attracted increasing interest in recent years for their therapeutic effect on mental illness. For example, selective MAO-A inhibitors such as iproniazid, clorgyline and moclobemide exhibit antidepressant and antianxiety activity [4,5]. Selective MAO-B inhibitors such as selegiline, rasagiline and lazabemide are used as adjuncts in the treatment of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases [6]. Unfortunately, most of the existing MAO inhibitors, such as iproniazid and tranylcypromine, have been shown to induce hepatotoxicity and another important side effect, the “cheese reaction” [7,8]. Thus, the development of new MAO inhibitors for neuro-related diseases is urgently needed.

In order to address the need for new MAO inhibitors with fewer side effects, our group evaluated compounds previously discovered for their potential as MAOIs. Among them, we found safinamide, which was reported to be a potent anti-MAO B agent, and milacemide, which was found to be a potent MAO inhibitor and a prodrug for glycine [9,10]. Of note, both compounds possess an acetamide group (Figure 1), prompting us to hypothesize that acetamide might play an important role in inhibition of MAO activities. Therefore, we herein report the synthesis of a new series of 2-phenoxyacetamide analogues and the evaluation of their inhibition of MAO-A and MAO-B activities.

Figure 1. Examples of known monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors bearing an acetamide group.

Figure 1. Examples of known monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors bearing an acetamide group.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

To begin, 2-phenoxyacetamide analogues were synthesized by a nucleophilic reaction, outlined in Scheme 1. Substituted phenols with electron donating (Me or OMe) or withdrawing groups (F, Cl, COOCH₃ or CHO) reacted with 2-chloroethanamide under basic conditions, creating aryloxycarboxylic acetamides in excellent yields.

Scheme 1. General synthetic method for 2-phenoxyacetamide analogues.

Scheme 1. General synthetic method for 2-phenoxyacetamide analogues.

Furthermore, in order to broaden the scope of such kind of compounds, more derivatives bearing heterocycles and amines (compounds 19–26) were synthesized according to the procedures outlined in Scheme 2. For example, compounds 19 and 20 were obtained in modest yield from the condensation of compound 6 or 7 with ethylenediamine. The reaction of the different aldehydes and propargylamine (or benzylamine) produced the corresponding schiff bases 21, 23, 25, followed by reduction to compounds 22, 24, and 26 respectively, with four equivalents of NaBH₄. Structures of target compounds 1–26 were confirmed by their1H and 13C NMR spectra and high-resolution electron impactmass spectra (HR-EIMS) (see SI).

Scheme 2. Synthetic methods for compounds 19–26.

Scheme 2. Synthetic methods for compounds 19–26.

2.2. Enzyme Inhibition Studies

All of these compounds were evaluated for their inhibitory abilities towards MAOs. The inhibition activities against MAO-A and MAO-B of the synthesized compounds were investigated by our reported method [11,12]. The IC₅₀ values with MAO-A and MAO-B and the selectivity index (SI, IC₅₀ of MAO-B/IC₅₀ of MAO-A) of all compounds are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Monamine oxidase inhibitory activity of compounds 1–28 ^a.

Item	R	X	IC50 (μM)		SI b
			MAO-A	MAO-B
1	Phenyl	O	69	778	11.27
2	2-Naphthalenyl	O	149	542	3.64
3	4-Fluoro-phenyl	O	92	255	2.77
4	4-Chloro-phenyl	O	490	202	0.41
5	2-Chloro-phenyl	O	98	694	7.08
6	4-Formyl-phenyl	O	89	457	5.13
7	2-Formyl-phenyl	O	142	559	3.94
8	3,4-Dimethyl-phenyl	O	113	534	4.73
9	2-Methyl-phenyl	O	26	663	25.5
10	4-Methyl-phenyl	O	3	541	180
11	2-Methoxy-phenyl	O	96	775	8.07
12	4-Methoxy-phenyl	O	4	980	245
13	o-Carboxyphenyl	O	217	177	0.82
14	o-Acid ester	O	108	98	0.91
15	4-( N-tert-Butyl O-acyl)amine-phenyl	O	196	296	1.51
16	4-( N-acetyl)amine- phenyl	O	61	553	9.07
17	Phenyl	S	166	642	3.87
18	3,4-Dimethyl-phenyl	S	292	366	1.58
19	4-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-phenyl	O	61	506	8.30
20	2-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-phenyl	O	186	714	3.84
21	4-((Prop-2-ynylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.018	0.076	4.22
22	4-((Prop-2-ynylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.094	0.164	1.74
23	4-((benzylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	96	575	5.99
24	4-((benzylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	37	534	14.43
25	2-((Prop-2-ynylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.068	0.176	2.59
26	2-((Prop-2-ynylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.168	0.188	1.19
27	2-((benzylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	147	562	3.82
28	2-((benzylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	107	497	4.64
	Clorgyline		0.0011 (0.0014)
	Pargyline			0.0035 (0.0038)

^a Results are expressed as mean IC₅₀; ^b SI = (IC₅₀ of MAO-B)/(IC₅₀ of MAO-A).

Table 1. Monamine oxidase inhibitory activity of compounds 1–28 ^a.

Item	R	X	IC50 (μM)		SI b
			MAO-A	MAO-B
1	Phenyl	O	69	778	11.27
2	2-Naphthalenyl	O	149	542	3.64
3	4-Fluoro-phenyl	O	92	255	2.77
4	4-Chloro-phenyl	O	490	202	0.41
5	2-Chloro-phenyl	O	98	694	7.08
6	4-Formyl-phenyl	O	89	457	5.13
7	2-Formyl-phenyl	O	142	559	3.94
8	3,4-Dimethyl-phenyl	O	113	534	4.73
9	2-Methyl-phenyl	O	26	663	25.5
10	4-Methyl-phenyl	O	3	541	180
11	2-Methoxy-phenyl	O	96	775	8.07
12	4-Methoxy-phenyl	O	4	980	245
13	o-Carboxyphenyl	O	217	177	0.82
14	o-Acid ester	O	108	98	0.91
15	4-( N-tert-Butyl O-acyl)amine-phenyl	O	196	296	1.51
16	4-( N-acetyl)amine- phenyl	O	61	553	9.07
17	Phenyl	S	166	642	3.87
18	3,4-Dimethyl-phenyl	S	292	366	1.58
19	4-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-phenyl	O	61	506	8.30
20	2-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-phenyl	O	186	714	3.84
21	4-((Prop-2-ynylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.018	0.076	4.22
22	4-((Prop-2-ynylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.094	0.164	1.74
23	4-((benzylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	96	575	5.99
24	4-((benzylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	37	534	14.43
25	2-((Prop-2-ynylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.068	0.176	2.59
26	2-((Prop-2-ynylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	0.168	0.188	1.19
27	2-((benzylimino)methyl)-phenyl	O	147	562	3.82
28	2-((benzylamino)methyl)-phenyl	O	107	497	4.64
	Clorgyline		0.0011 (0.0014)
	Pargyline			0.0035 (0.0038)

^a Results are expressed as mean IC₅₀; ^b SI = (IC₅₀ of MAO-B)/(IC₅₀ of MAO-A).

The results clearly show that almost all compounds take on higher inhibitory activity against MAO-A than MAO-B (SI > 1). Particularly, the compound 12 containing para-methoxyl moiety exhibits the best selectivity and the SI value is up to 245 as an MAO-A inhibitor. On the basis of the results in Table 1, the addition of methyl and methoxy groups in the benzene ring appears to increase inhibitory activity toward MAO-A rather than MAO-B. The dimethyl-substituted compound 8 significantly lost selectivity and inhibitory activity against MAO-A, compared with the single substitute compounds 9 and 10. One can also conclude that the addition of F or Cl at the ortho or para position in the phenyl ring (compound 3–6) seemed to decrease inhibitory activity against MAO-A. In order to increase inhibitory activity and selectivity, amino groups were added by modification of compounds 6 and 7 with different amines to obtain compounds 21–26. Their IC₅₀ values for MAO-A and B were found to be decreased by approximately 100 fold. The compound 21 bearing propynylimino moiety posses the best activity, and the IC₅₀ value is up to 18 nM, which indicates that imine group may contribute to the binding affinity for MAOs. From Table 1, it can be further figured that the 2-phenoxyl derivatives 1 and 8 have better activities than the 2-thiophenyl compounds 17 and 18, respectively, indicating that the replacement of 2-O with 2-S has very little affect on the potency of inhibition toward MAO-A and MAO-B.

Having demonstrated that 2-phenoxyacetamides displayed good inhibitory activity by enzymatic assay, we also carried out experiments to detect their inhibitory potency on the native MAOs, using lysates from human tumor cells as source of enzyme. Thus, lysates from SH-SY5Y (neuroblastoma cells) and HepG2 (human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell) cells, where possessing only endogenous MAO-A and B activities, respectively [13,14], were utilized determine inhibitory of the newly synthesized compounds. Compounds 12, 21, 22, 25 were chosen for comparison due to their excellent inhibitory activities, and the results were shown in Table 2. Substantially, all four compounds were found to be able to inhibit the native enzymes from raw samples, but display much less potent inhibitory in cell lysates than enzymes. The compound 21 was still the most potent inhibitor in SH-SY5Y and HepG2 lysates, and 21, 22 and 25 displayed 2.3, 2.0 and 2.1 times more potent in SH-SY5Y lysate relative to HepG2 lysate, respectively, in agreement with enzyme assays. However, it is noteworthy that these three compounds significantly lost inhibitory activities in both of the lysates compared to 12. This is most likely due to the instability of imine group in cell lysates.

Table 2. MAO inhibitory activity (μM) in different cell lysates ^a.

Enzymes/Cell Lysates	12	21	22	25
SH-SY5Y	5.4	0.18	0.26	0.88
MAO-A	4.0	0.018	0.094	0.068
HepG2	N.D. b	0.41	0.53	1.81
MAO-B	980	0.076	0.164	0.176

^a Results are expressed as mean IC₅₀. All experiments were repeated three times; ^b N.D. means not determined.

Table 2. MAO inhibitory activity (μM) in different cell lysates ^a.

Enzymes/Cell Lysates	12	21	22	25
SH-SY5Y	5.4	0.18	0.26	0.88
MAO-A	4.0	0.018	0.094	0.068
HepG2	N.D. b	0.41	0.53	1.81
MAO-B	980	0.076	0.164	0.176

^a Results are expressed as mean IC₅₀. All experiments were repeated three times; ^b N.D. means not determined.

2.3. Reversibility of Inhibition

To determine whether this new series of compounds are reversible or irreversible inhibitors toward MAOs, the reversibility of inhibition of compound 12 and Safinamide was further studied using repeated washing method. As shown in Table 3, the enzyme activities were able to be recovered by more than 80% after repeated washing, indicating that inhibition of both MAO-A and MAO-B is reversible in presence of these two compounds.

Taken together, all these findings suggest that the derivatives of acetamide may be developed as potential lead compounds for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases (MAOI-B), and affective disorders (MAOI-A).

Table 3. Reversibility of MAOs inhibition with 12 and Safinamide.

Compound	MAO-A Inhibiton (%)		MAO-B Inhibiton (%)
	Before Washing	After Washing	Before Washing	After Washing
12 (100 nM)	88.7%	12.5%	96.9%	8.6%
Safinamide (100 nM)	36.1%	9.8%	91.3%	7.1%

Table 3. Reversibility of MAOs inhibition with 12 and Safinamide.

Compound	MAO-A Inhibiton (%)		MAO-B Inhibiton (%)
	Before Washing	After Washing	Before Washing	After Washing
12 (100 nM)	88.7%	12.5%	96.9%	8.6%
Safinamide (100 nM)	36.1%	9.8%	91.3%	7.1%

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Methods

Silica gel (100–200 mesh, Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co., Qingdao, China) was used for flash column chromatography. Analytical thin-layer chromatography was performed with GF254 silica gel. ¹H-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz apparatus. HR-ESI-MS and HR-EI analysis were measured on a Bruker micrOTOF-QII and Waters GCT Premier GC-TOF-MS spectrometer, respectively. All chemicals were purchased from the Eastern China Chemical Co (Hangzhou, China). All fluorescent data was recorded on Spectrum M2 (Molecular Device Company). Human recombinant Monoamine Oxidase A (M7316) and B (M7441) (5 mg/mL) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Pierce BCA protein assay kit (23227) was purchased from Thermo Scientific.

3.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Derivatives of Acetamides [15]

3.2.1. General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 1–18

2-Chloroethanamide (1 mmol), K₂CO₃ (1.5 mmol) and KI (0.1 mmol) was added to a solution of phenol (1 mmol) in dry DMF. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h, and was extracted with EtOAc twice. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, and the solvent stripped out in a rotary evaporator to obtain the crude product, which was further purified using silica gel chromatography to obtain a white solid.

Compound 1: ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 4.57 (s, 2H), 5.95 (brs, 1H), 6.71 (brs, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (m, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 67.9, 113.7, 123.5, 129.4, 158.1, 171.6. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₈H₉NO₂ [M⁺] 151.0633 found 151.0628.

Compound 2: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 4.71 (s, 2H), 5.97 (brs, 1H), 6.61 (brs, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (m, 4H), 7.88 (m, 1H), 8.39 (m, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 67.7, 106.2, 110.7, 122.8, 124.5, 125.7, 126.0, 126.5, 127.3, 134.4, 153.1, 169.5. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₂H₁₁NO₂ [M⁺] 201.0790 found 202.0775.

Compound 3: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 4.82 (s, 2H), 5.99 (s, 2H), 6.92 (s, 2H), 7.78 (m, 2H) 8.11 (m, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 68.1, 115.2 (J = 6.9 Hz), 116.5 (J = 23.2 Hz), 152.4, 155.1, 171.6 (J = 238.1 Hz). HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₈H₉FNO₂ [M⁺] 170.0617 found 170.0602.

Compound 4: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 4.75 (s, 2H), 6.18 (s, 2H), 6.88 (m, 4H) 7.24 (m, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 68.1, 115.7, 117.1, 132.4, 154.7, 171.4. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₈H₉ClNO₂ [M⁺] 185.0244, 187.0214, found 185.0236, 187.0221.

Compound 5: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 4.75 (s, 2 H), 6.12, 6.35 (s, 2H), 6.99 (m, 2 H), 7.32 (m, 3H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 68.1, 122.1, 122.6, 129.3, 132.4, 170.4. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₈H₉ClNO₂ [M⁺] 185.0244, 187.0214, found 185.0250, 187.0238.

Compound 6: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 4.74 (s, 2 H), 6.00 (brs, 1H), 6.52 (brs, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 9.93 (s, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 68.5, 115.6, 131.0, 133.5, 164.2, 191.3. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₉NO₃ [M⁺] 179.0582, found 179.0584.

Compound 7: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 4.75 (s, 2 H), 6.00 (brs, 1H), 6.52 (brs, 1H), 7.54 (m, 4H), 9.88 (s, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 69.7, 115.2, 122.9, 126.1, 133.5, 136.6, 163.2, 170.7. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₉NO₃ [M⁺] 179.0582, found 179.0579.

Compound 8: ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 2.31 (s, 3H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 7.58 (s, 2H), 5.67 (brs, 1H), 6.62 (brs, 1H), 7.07 (m, 3H). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 18.1, 19.6, 69.2, 1112.3, 115.9, 128.6, 129.9, 140.3, 157.6, 170.3. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₀H₁₃NO₂ [M⁺] 179.0946, found 179.0934.

Compound 9: ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 2.18 (s, 3H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 5.67 (brs, 1H), 6.62 (brs, 1H), 7.12 (m, 4H). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 15.6, 69.6, 113.5, 123.1, 126.7, 1267.2, 132.9, 157.3, 169.8. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₁₁NO₂ [M⁺] 115.0790, found 115.0779.

Compound 10: ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃): δ 2.28 (s, 3H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 5.61 (brs, 1H), 6.60 (brs, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 55.7, 68.0, 114.7, 115.8, 151.4, 154.1, 171.6. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₁₁NO₂ [M⁺] 165.0790, found 165.0802.

Compound 11: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 3.92 (s, 3H), 4.57 (s, 2H), 5.95 (brs, 2H), 7.00 (m, 4H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 55.3, 109.2, 116.7, 120.6, 122.3, 146.9, 150.5, 170.1. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₁₁NO₃ [M⁺] 181.0739, found 181.0742.

Compound 12: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 3.97 (s, 3H), 4.57 (s, 2H), 5.81 (brs, 1H), 6.70 (brs, 1H), 6.93 (m, 4H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 20.4, 67.4, 69.2, 114.5, 130.2, 131.5, 155.2, 171.5. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₁₁NO₃ [M⁺] 181.0739, found 181.0721.

Compound 13: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 4.74 (s, 2H), 5.67 (brs, 1H), 6.62 (brs, 1H), 7.50 (m, 4H), 12.09 (brs, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 69.6, 115.2, 117.2, 122.1, 132.6, 136.5, 158.4, 166.2, 170.3. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₉NO₄ [M⁺] 195.0532, found 195.0526.

Compound 14: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 3.38 (s, 3H), 4.78 (s, 2H), 5.67 (brs, 1H), 6.62 (brs, 1H), 7.49 (m, 4H), 10.09 (brs, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 51.2, 69.6, 114.9, 117.1, 122.5, 132.6, 136.5, 158.8, 166.0, 170.3. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₀H₁₁NO₄ [M⁺] 209.0688, found 209.0697.

Compound 15: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 1.40 (s, 9H), 4.75 (s, 2H), 7.38 (m, 4H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 28.9, 69.6, 79.2, 112.5, 120.3, 122.6, 127.7, 148.2, 148.9, 153.0, 170.1. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₃H₁₈N₂O₄ [M⁺] 266.1267, found 266.1258.

Compound 16: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 2.11 (s, 3H), 4.76 (s, 2H), 7.03 (m, 4H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 25.1, 70.2, 113.1, 120.9, 121.6, 126.8, 129.5, 169.6, 170.1. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₀H₁₂N₂O₃ [M⁺] 208.0848, found 208.0857.

Compound 17: ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 3.63 (s, 2H), 6.10 (brs, 1H), 6.70 (brs, 1H), 7.27 (m, 4H). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 38.2, 127.3, 130.1, 130.3, 136.8, 174.3. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₈H₉NOS [M⁺] 167.0405, found 167.0412.

Compound 18: ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 2.30 (s, 3H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 5.67 (brs, 1H), 6.62 (brs, 1H), 7.03 (m, 3H), ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 21.9, 38.2, 127.6, 131.9, 135.2, 174.9. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₉H₁₁NOS [M⁺] 181.0561, found 181.0554.

3.2.2. Preparation of Compounds 19 and 20

Ethane-1,2-diamine (1.10 mmol) was added to a solution of compounds 6 or 7 (1 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 40 min, then NBS (1 mmol) was added and the reaction was stirred overnight. The resultant precipitate was extracted with chloroform and washed successively with water. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and the solvent stripped out in a rotary evaporator to yield the crude product. The residue was further purified using silica gel chromatography to obtain compound 19 or 20.

Compound 19: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 3.80 (s, 4H), 3.96 (brs, 1H), 4.82 (s, 2H), 5.97 (brs, 1H), 6.82 (brs, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 46.9, 71.5, 112.5, 130.2, 157.2, 164.8, 167.5. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₁H₁₃N₃O₂ [M⁺] 219.1008, found 219.1023.

Compound 20: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 3.80 (m, 4H), 4.83 (s, 2H), 5.67 (brs, 1H), 6.62 (brs, 1H), 7.04 (m, 2H), 7.43 (m, 1H), 8.00 (m, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 46.9, 71.5, 110.1, 112.9, 120.6, 128.4, 132.0, 157.2, 164.8, 167.5. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₁H₁₃N₃O₂ [M⁺] 219.1008, found 219.1018.

3.2.3. Preparation of Compounds 21, 23 or 25

Propargylamine or benzylamine (1.1 mmol) and MgSO₄ (0.2 g) were added to a solution of compound 6 or 7 (1 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. After completion of the reaction, the solid was removed by filtration and the solvent was distilled, followed by the addition of water and EtOAc. The organic layer was dried over MgSO₄, filtered, and the solvent removed under vacuum. The residue was chromatographed to obtain the products 21, 23 or 25.

Compound 21: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 2.83 (s, 1H), 4.22 (m, 2H), 4.59 (s, 2H), 5.18 (m, 2H), 5.82 (brs, 1H), 6.50 (brs, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 8.61 (s, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 48.2, 67.7, 75.2, 79.1, 113.0, 134.0, 132.5, 171.2, 160.6, 190.2. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₂H₁₂N₂O₂ [M⁺] 216.0899, found 216.0873.

Compound 23: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 4.50 (s, 2H), 4.77 (s, 2H), 5.85 (brs, 1H), 6.56 (brs, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (m, 5H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.31 (s, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 65.1, 69.9, 115.1, 125.2, 125.8, 126.7, 127.2, 128.4, 129.0, 131.3, 138.9, 161.0, 162.8, 170.3. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₆H₁₆N₂O₂ [M⁺] 268.1212, found 268.1225.

Compound 25: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 2.80 (s, 1H), 4.36 (s, 2H), 4.65(s, 2H), 6.92 (m, 2H), 7.35 (m, 1H), 7.89 (m, 1H), 8.65 (s, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 44.8, 70.3, 71.1, 81.2, 114.4, 121.2, 130.6, 132.3, 132.3, 142.5, 165.5, 190.6. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₂H₁₂N₂O₂ [M⁺] 216.0899, found 216.0908.

3.2.4. Preparation of Compound 22, 24 or 26

Compound 21, 21 or 25 (1 mmol) and NaBH₄ (3 mmol) were dissolved in absolute EtOH under mechanical stirring for 15 min. The ethanolic filtrate was evaporated to dryness, dissolved in DCM, and washed with water. The organic layer was dried over MgSO₄, filtered, and evaporated to dryness to obtain compounds 22, 24 or 26.

Compound 22: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 2.65 (m, 1H), 3.72 (s, 2H), 4.65(s, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 38.8, 52.6, 68.1, 72.8, 83.4, 113.6, 132.1, 131.0, 156.9, 169.2. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₂H₁₄N₂O₂ [M⁺] 218.1055, found 218.1070.

Compound 25: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 2.80 (s, 1H), 4.36 (s, 2H), 4.65(s, 2H), 6.92 (m, 2H), 7.35 (m, 1H), 7.89 (m, 1H), 8.65 (s, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 44.8, 70.3, 71.1, 81.2, 114.4, 121.2, 130.6, 132.3, 132.3, 142.5, 165.5, 190.6. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₂H₁₂N₂O₂ [M⁺] 216.0899, found 216.0908.

Compound 26: ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 2.65 (s, 1H), 3.47 (m, 2H), 3.78 (s, 2H), 4.85 (s, 2H), 5.79 (brs, 1H), 6.64 (brs, 1H), 6.90 (m, 1H), 7.23 (m, 3H). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃-d₃): δ 39.7, 46.9, 69.3, 72.1, 83.4, 112.4, 119.8, 123.1, 127.6, 128.2, 157.6, 169.5. HR-MS (EI) calculated for C₁₂H₁₄N₂O₂ [M⁺] 218.1055, found 218.1050.

3.3. Biochemistry

3.3.1. MAOs Inhibitory Assay

MAO IC₅₀ values were determined using our reported fluorescence-based microplate assay [11]. Briefly, MAO-A (or -B) and inhibitors (10 nM–1000 μM) were incubated in borate buffer (50 mM, pH 8.4) at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by the addition of 50 μM 4-methyl-7-(3-aminopropoxy) coumarin (Km 62 μM or 82 μM for MAO-A and MAO-B, respectively). The fluorescent signals were measured at λ_ex 360 nm and λ_em 460 nm on a Spectrum-M2 spectrofluorometer.

IC₅₀ values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using the four-parameter equation [Y = max − (max − min)/(1 + (X/IC₅₀)^N] where Y is the observed fluorescence, X is the concentration of inhibitor, max is the fluorescence in the absence of inhibitor (0% control), min is the fluorescence in the presence of inhibitor (MAO activity was completed inhibited, 100% control), IC₅₀ is the concentration of inhibitor that gave 50% increase in fluorescence, and N is the empirical Hill slope. Curve fitting was performed using commercial software (IDBS ActivityBase XE). Each IC₅₀ was calculated based on 5 points ranged from 10 nM to 1 mM (10, 20, 40, 80 nM, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1, 2, 4, 8, 20, 40, 80, 200, 400, 800, 1000 μM) based on its value of IC₅₀.

3.3.2. Cell Lysates Preparation

Cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ in RPMI-1640 media containing 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 10% FBS. For lysis, cells were resuspended at 5 × 10⁷ cells/mL in lysis buffer (42.3 mM PBS, 126 mM NaCl, 1.27 mM MgCl₂, 0.85 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 0.95% Triton X-100, 9.5% glycerol, 4% 25× complete protease inhibitor, pH 7.4). The cells were vortexed to mix and keep on ice for 30 min, and then sonicated to break the cells (180 watts). The cell lysate was then clarified by ultracentrifugation at 4 °C for 30 min at 45,000. Total protein concentration was determined via a Bradford Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad) and cell lysates were stored at −80 °C until further use.

3.3.3. Reversibility Experiments

Reversibility of the MAO inhibition with derivatives of acetamides was evaluated by a reported method [16]. MAO-A or B were incubated with 21 (50 nM) or safinamide (100 nm) as the reference in a sodium phosphate buffer (PBS, 50 mM, pH 7.4) at 37 °C. After incubating for 2 h, an aliquot was stored at 4 °C for the measurement of MAO-A and -B activity. The remaining reaction solution was placed in an Ultrafree-0.5 centrifugal tube with a 30 kDa Biomax membrane (Millipore) and centrifuged at 9000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The enzyme retained in the membrane was resuspended in a sodium phosphate buffer and centrifuged two successive times. Then, the enzyme retained in the membrane was resuspended in PBS (100 mL) and an aliquot of this suspension was used for MAO-A and -B activity measurement. In order to define 100% MAO activity, control experiments were performed simultaneously by replacing the inhibitors with appropriate dilutions of the vehicles. The corresponding values of percent MAO isoforms inhibition (with and without repeated washing) were calculated based on the control experiments.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have synthesized a series of 2-phenoxyacetamide analogues and evaluated their monoamine oxidase (MAO) A/B inhibitory activity and selectivity in vitro. The results show that most of the synthesized compounds are potent and selective inhibitors of MAO-A rather than of MAO-B. Of particular importance is compound 12, which has exhibited excellent inhibitory activity selectivity toward MAO-A, and compound 21, which displayed the highest MAO-A inhibitory potency. Future studies aimed at designing new MAO inhibitors should focus on addition of acetamide, which we have established as a unique functional group capable of potently inhibition MAOs.