Next Article in Journal
Theory and Applications of Covalent Docking in Drug Discovery: Merits and Pitfalls
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeting Carbonic Anhydrase IX Activity and Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Purification and Characterization of Chitinases from Ridgetail White Prawn Exopalaemon carinicauda
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deoxypodophyllotoxin Induces G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in SGC-7901 Cells and Inhibits Tumor Growth in Vivo
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 20
Issue 2
10.3390/molecules20021968
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 6-Hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one Schiff Bases as Potential Anticancer Agents

by
Eliza De Lucas Chazin
1,
Paola De Souza Sanches
1,
Eric Brazil Lindgren
1,2,
Walcimar Trindade Vellasco Júnior
1,3,
Laine Celestino Pinto
4,
Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano
4,
Julliane Diniz Yoneda
5,
Kátia Zaccur Leal
1,
Claudia Regina Brandão Gomes
3,
James Lewis Wardell
3,6,
Solange Maria Silva Veloso Wardell
7,
Raquel Carvalho Montenegro
4 and
Thatyana Rocha Alves Vasconcelos
1,*
1
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Outeiro de São João Batista s/no, Centro, Niterói 24020-141, RJ, Brazil
2
School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
3
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto de Tecnologia em Fármacos-Farmanguinhos, Rua Sizenando Nabuco 100, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21041-250, RJ, Brazil
4
Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Av. Augusto Corrêa 01, Guamá, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil
5
Departamento de Química, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Desembargador Ellis Hemydio Figueira 783, Aterrado, Volta Redonda 27213-415, RJ, Brazil
6
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen AB 24 3UE, Scotland
7
CHEMSOL, 1 Harcourt Road, Aberdeen AB15 5NY, Scotland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(2), 1968-1983; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20021968
Submission received: 29 September 2014 / Revised: 25 December 2014 / Accepted: 31 December 2014 / Published: 27 January 2015
(This article belongs to the Collection Efficient Pharmaceutical and Chemical Approaches for Anticancer Therapy: Design, Preliminary Evaluations, and Further Developments)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the aim of discovering new anticancer agents, we have designed and synthesized novel 6-hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one Schiff bases. The synthesis started with the selective nitration at 5-position of 6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (1) leading to the nitro derivative 2. The nitro group of 2 was reduced to give the amino intermediate 3. Schiff bases 4a–r were obtained from coupling reactions between 3 and various benzaldehydes and heteroaromatic aldehydes. All the new compounds were fully identified and characterized by NMR (1H and 13C) and specifically for 4q by X-ray crystallography. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the compounds was evaluated against cancer cell lines (ACP-03, SKMEL-19 and HCT-116) by using MTT assay. Schiff bases 4b and 4o exhibited promising cytotoxicity against ACP-03 and SKMEL-19, respectively, with IC50 values lower than 5 μM. This class of compounds can be considered as a good starting point for the development of new lead molecules in the fight against cancer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cancer still remains a threat to huamn health, figuring among the leading causes of death worldwide [1,2]. In 2012, cancer was responsible for 8.2 million deaths and it is expected that annual cases will rise from 14 million in 2012 to 22 within the next two decades [1,3]. In the last years, many efforts have been made to develop new strategies for finding effective ways of treating this disease, which include not only an increase in the understanding of the biological process involved in cancer survival but also the search for more selective and potent chemotherapeutic agents [4].
In this context, several heterocyclic systems with five-membered rings fused to a benzene nucleus play an important role on designing of new drugs, since they display an interesting and diversified pharmacological profile. In particular, 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one and its derivatives have been reported as important pharmacophores that exhibit antibacterial, antimycotic, antioxidant, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory activities [5,6,7,8]. In 2011, our research group has published the first review article highlighting the main aspects of the chemistry and biological properties of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-ones [5].
Schiff bases have also been explored for their varied biological activities including antibacterial, anticancer, antioxidant, antifungal, antiviral, antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, antiglycation, angiotensin-II receptor antagonist, antidepressant and anticonvulsant [9,10,11,12,13].
Continuing our efforts on the synthesis of pharmacologically important heterocycles [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], we have decided to synthesize novel Schiff bases containing the 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one moiety, an important heterocycle that has been little explored to date, and investigate their potential anticancer activity against different human cancer cell lines.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

1,3-Benzoxathiol-2-one derivatives were prepared as shown in Scheme 1. The synthesis started with the selective nitration at 5-position of the commercially available 6-hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (1) using HNO3 65% and CH2Cl2 as solvent leading to the nitro derivative 2 in 75% yield. Melting point and spectral data (IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and ESI-MS) were consistent with literature data [24]. Key intermediate 3 was obtained in excellent yield (85%) by catalytic hydrogenation of 2 in ethanol with 10% Pd/C in a Berghof BR-300 reactor under 7 bar H2 pressure at 50 °C. It is noteworthy that this reaction was first attempted in ethanol at room temperature affording the product in very low yield, around 2%. Other classic methodologies like Fe/HCl; SnCl2/EtOH; Fe/NH4Cl 0.05 M have also been used, however none of these methods were successful in this case [25,26,27].
Molecules 20 01968 g003 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one derivatives.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one derivatives.
Molecules 20 01968 g003
New compound 3 had its structure confirmed by spectral data (IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and ESI-MS). The IR spectrum indicated the reduction of the nitro group by the absence of the nitro vibrations at 1538 and 1275 cm−1 and by the presence of two N-H stretching vibrations at 3476 and 3389 cm−1. The 1H-NMR showed two singlets at 6.80 and 6.76 ppm for H7 and H4, respectively. The 13C-NMR spectrum exhibited the C=O signal at 170.5 ppm, carbons C6, C7a, C5 and C3a at 144.2, 138.9, 135.8 and 110.8 ppm, respectively and carbons C7 and C4 could be identified at 106.6 ppm and 99.2 ppm. Schiff bases 4a–r were obtained from reactions of 3 with the appropriate benzaldehyde or heteroaromatic aldehyde in ethanol at room temperature (0.5–8 h) in 32%–82% yields. The structures of the new synthesized compounds were appropriately characterized by spectral data (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, IR and ESI-MS). 2D-NMR techniques (COSY, HSQC and HMBC) helped us to assign the correct signals of the compounds. As an example, the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4b exhibited two singlets at 9.86 and 8.87 ppm for O-H and imine proton (N=C-H), respectively. Protons H3'/H5' and H2'/H6' are shown as duplets at 8.36 ppm (J = 8.8 Hz) and 8.29 ppm (J = 8.8 Hz), respectively. Protons H7 and H4 appeared as singlets at 7.71 and 7.06 ppm. The 13C-NMR spectra exhibited the C=O signal at 169.7 ppm, C=N at 157.5 ppm and the C4' at 152.2 ppm. IR spectrum of compound 4b showed the C=N stretching vibration at 1597 cm−1 and also the absence of the corresponding N-H vibrations.

2.2. Crystallography

Attempts were made to grow suitable crystals of various derivatives 4 for single crystal structure determinations. However, prolonged standing in alcohol solutions at room temperature generally led to deep colorations with deposited dark colored fine powders. Recrystallizations from other solvents were equally unsuccessful. Only far-from-ideal crystals of 4q, grown from EtOH solution, were found to be of any use. However, while the data collected for these best crystals were disappointing, the atom connections within the molecule and the molecular conformation were securely established. While 4q was not one of the active compounds, see Table 1, the conformation, particularly about the (benzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one fragment is representative of those of the series 4, as a whole. The structure of 4q, deduced from the spectral data, was confirmed by the crystallographic study, including the (E)-stereochemistry about the C=N bond, see Figure 1 [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. All bond lengths and angles are in the expected regions. The molecules of 4q in the solid are very near planar.
Table
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one derivatives for cancer cell lines a.
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one derivatives for cancer cell lines a.
CompoundMTTHemolysis
IC50 μM
ACP-03SKMEL-19HCT-116EC50 (μg/mL) b
2>10>10>10>200
3>10>10>10>200
4a>10>10>10>200
4b4.8 (3.2–7.2)>10>10>200
4c>10>10>10>200
4d>10>10>10>200
4e>10>10>10>200
4f>10>10>10>200
4g>10>10>10>200
4h>10>10>10>200
4i>10>10>10>200
4j>10>10>10>200
4k>10>10>10>200
4l>10>10>10>200
4m>109.4 (7.3–12.1)>10>200
4n>105.6 (4.7–6.4)>10>200
4o>102.8 (2.0–3.8)>10>200
4p>10>10>10>200
4q>10>10>10>200
4r>10>10>10>200
Dox0.274 (0.22–0.33)0.045 (0.01–0.15)0.1 (0.05–0.28)>200
Notes: a Data are presented as IC50 values and 95% of confidence interval for gastric (ACP-03), melanoma (SKMEL-19) and colon (HCT-116) cancer cells. Doxorubicin (Dox) was used as positive control. Experiments were performed in triplicate; b EC50 = effective concentration.
Molecules 20 01968 g001 550
Figure 1. Atom arrangements and numbering scheme for 4q.
Figure 1. Atom arrangements and numbering scheme for 4q.
Molecules 20 01968 g001
The hydroxyl group, O3–H3, is involved in a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond with the imine nitrogen (N): details are: O3–H3 = 0.84 Å, H3···N1 = 2.15 Å, O3···N = 2.633(8) Å and ∠O3–H3···N1 = 117°. A Platon analysis indicates another, but weaker, intramolecular C13–H13···N2 hydrogen bond. Several short intermolecular contacts of the types, C–H..N, C–H..O, C–H..π, C–O..π and π–π generate a three dimensional molecular array.

2.3. Molecular Modeling

The lowest energy conformer obtained corresponds to the E isomer found experimentally. For compound 4q, its calculated structure is in agreement with the X-ray data (in parenthesis): O(6)–H(6) = 0.97 Å (0.84 Å), H(6)···N = 2.09 Å (2.15 Å), O(6)···N = 2.67 Å (2.633(8) Å) and ∠O(6)–H(6)···N = 116.6° (117°). A difference of 4.83 kcal/mol in the free energy (G) of isomers E and Z (Figure 2) was found. It should be noted the contribution of the stabilization effect provided by the formation of the strong intramolecular hydrogen bond between the imine nitrogen and the hydroxyl group for the E isomer, which is weaker in the Z isomer.
Molecules 20 01968 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) E isomer, the lowest energy conformer and the only isomer observed experimentally; (b) Z isomer (ΔG = +4.83 kcal/mol).
Figure 2. (a) E isomer, the lowest energy conformer and the only isomer observed experimentally; (b) Z isomer (ΔG = +4.83 kcal/mol).
Molecules 20 01968 g002

2.4. Biological Activity

In vitro anticancer activity of compounds 2, 3 and 4a–r was evaluated against three human cancer cell lines in comparison to doxorubicin by using MTT assay [35]. The antitumor activities are summarized in Table 1.
Results have shown that 4b exhibited a good cytotoxicity against ACP-03 and compounds 4m, 4n and 4o were considered to be active against SKMEL-19. Based on data collected from three independent experiments, compound 4o was the most active with an IC50 value of 2.8 μM against melanoma cell line, whereas 4m and 4n have shown moderate activity for this same cancer cell line with IC50 values of 9.4 and 5.6 μM, respectively. Compound 4b displayed a good cytotoxicity against ACP-03 with IC50 value of 4.8 μM. These results are in accordance to National Cancer Institute (NCI) protocols, where compounds exhibiting IC50 values <10 μM or 15 μM are considered active [36]. It is noteworthy that the active compounds bear nitro, hydroxyl or both groups in its structure, highlighting the most active compound 4o, which bears a hydroxyl group at position 2' and a nitro group at position 5'. Activity reduction against SKMEL-19 was observed for dihydroxyl compounds 4m and 4n when compared to 4o. This fact suggests the importance of these two different groups for the biological activity of this series. It is interesting to notice that the most active compound of a previously reported series of (E)-benzothiazole hydrazones against a specific leukemia (HL-60) cancer cell line follows this same pattern of substitution [17].
The mechanical stability of red blood cells is a good parameter for in vitro screening of unspecific cytotoxicity, since the membrane of erythrocyte can suffer significant changes in its structural properties [37]. In order to verify whether the cytotoxicity of the compounds was linked to the membrane disruption, the ability to induce lysis of mouse erythrocytes was investigated, and no membrane damage was found for all tested compounds (EC50 > 200 μg/mL). Therefore, we may suggest that the mechanism involved in cytotoxicity against cancer cell may not be related to nonspecific membrane damage (Table 1). In addition, none of these compounds exhibited cytotoxicity against the normal cells human fibroblast (MRC-5), murine fibroblast (NIH3T3) and normal human melanocyte (Melan-A).
In order to assess the potential oral bioavailability of all compounds, they were submitted to the Lipinski’s rule of five analysis (Table 2), which states that an orally active molecule should respect a molecular weight (MW) ≤ 500 g/mol, a partition coefficient octanol/water calculated clogP ≤ 5, a number of hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA) ≤ 10 and a number of hydrogen bond donors (HBD) ≤ 5 [38]. The related criteria Polar Surface Area (PSA) ≤ 140 A2, lately added by Veber et al. [39] was also included in the analysis.
All synthesized compounds fulfilled the parameters, which make them likely to be suitable for oral administration. The control compound, doxorubicin, failed to respect three of them: MW, PSA and HBA, which may explains its poor bioavailability after oral administration and why Dox chemotherapy is limited to intravenous administration or Dox-liposomes [40,41].
Table
Table 2. Lipinski’s rule of five for compounds 2, 3 and 4a–r.
Table 2. Lipinski’s rule of five for compounds 2, 3 and 4a–r.
MW (Da)PSA (A2)HBAHBDClogP
2213.16974.763612.05
3183.18764.793421.21
4a296.3160.46513.91
4b316.2983.96713.91
4c316.2983.92713.91
4d350.1947.81414.71
4e350.1945.05414.71
4f305.7445.09414.44
4g340.1943.30415.00
4h271.3045.12413.88
4i314.3745.92514.16
4j301.3252.09513.75
4k287.3060.01523.49
4l303.2977.42633.10
4m303.2978.77633.10
4n303.2979.36633.10
4o332.2998.31823.52
4p366.1961.31524.32
4q348.3851.36514.64
4r315.3161.28613.66
Dox543.53156.88125−0.68

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Information

All reagents and solvents were used as obtained from commercial suppliers without further purification. Reactions were routinely monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica-gel precoated F254 Merck plates visualized under UV light (254–366 nm). Melting points were determined on a Fisatom 430 instrument (Fisatom, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and are uncorrected. Catalytic hydrogenation reactions were performed on a Berghof BR-300 reactor (Berghof, Eningen, BW, Germany). IR spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer 1420 spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) using KBr pellets and frequencies are expressed in cm−1. Negative mode ESI-MS was done on a Waters ZQ-4000 single quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). NMR spectra were recorded on Varian Unity 300 and 500 (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) or on Bruker DRX 400 spectrometers (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in DMSO-d6, CDCl3 or (CD3)2CO-d6. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane. Elemental analysis was performed at CA IQ-USP, São Paulo, Brazil on a PerkinElmer-CHN 2400 analyzer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

3.2. Synthesis of 6-Hydroxy-5-nitrobenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (2)

A solution of 6-hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one 1 (5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C and then HNO3 65% (10 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and the acid excess was neutralized with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3. The reaction mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL), the combined organic extracts were dried over MgSO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 2 as a yellow solid. Yield: 75%; m.p. 180–182 °C (m.p. lit. [24] 178–180 °C). IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3216 (O-H); 1767 (C=O); 1538 (N-O); 1275 (N-O). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400.00 MHz, ppm): δ 10.90 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.22 (s, 1H, H4); 7.11 (s, 1H, H7). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100.0 MHz, ppm): δ 167.2 (C=O); 156.3 (C7a); 154.2 (C6); 131.6 (C5); 119.3 (C4); 115.8 (C3a); 103.2 (C7). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 212.1.

3.3. Synthesis of 5-Amino-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (3)

To a mixture of 6-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (2) (4 mmol) and ethanol (150 mL) was added 10% Pd/C (220 mg). The catalytic hydrogenation was performed in a Berghof reactor under 7 bar H2 pressure at 50 °C. After 8–10 h, the catalyst was filtered off, washed with ethanol and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield 3 as a green solid. Yield: 85%; m.p. 194–195 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3476 (N-H); 3389 (N-H); 1746 (C=O). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 6.80 (s, 1H, H7); 6.76 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 170.5 (C=O); 144.2 (C6); 138.9 (C7a); 135.8 (C5); 110.8 (C3a); 106.6 (C7); 99.2 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 182.1. Anal. Calcd. for C7H5NO3S: C, 45.90; H, 2.75; N, 7.65%, Found: C, 45.93; H, 2.62; N, 7.53%.

3.4. General Procedure for Synthesis of Schiff Bases 4a–r

The Schiff bases 4a–r were prepared from reactions between 3 (1 mmol) and the appropriate benzaldehyde or heteroaromatic aldehyde (1 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL). The system was kept under stirring at room temperature and the progress of the reactions was monitored by TLC using hexane/ethyl acetate (1:1) mixture as eluent. After reaction was completed (0.5–8 h), the solid product was collected by filtration and purified by washing with ethanol.
(E)-4-((6-Hydroxy-2-oxobenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-5-ylimino)methyl)benzonitrile (4a). Yield: 82%; m.p. 261–263 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3381 (O-H); 2224 (CN); 1739 (C=O); 1602 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.82 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.81 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.22 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, H2'/H6'); 8.00 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, H3'/H5'); 7.70 (s, 1H, H7); 7.06 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.5 (C=O); 157.9 (N=C-H); 152.1 (C4'); 147.3 (C6 or C7a); 139.9 (C7a or C6); 135.2 (C5); 132.5 (C3'/C5'); 129.3 (C2'/C6'); 118.4 (C1'); 113.3 (C7); 113.0 (CN); 111.8 (C3a); 100.1 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 294.9.
(E)-6-Hydroxy-5-(4-nitrobenzylideneamino)benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4b). Yield: 81%; m.p. 223–224 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3413 (O-H); 1747 (C=O); 1597 (C=N); 1515 (N-O); 1342 (N-O). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.86 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.87 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.36 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, H3'/H5'); 8.29 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, H2'/H6'); 7.71 (s, 1H, H7); 7.06 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.7 (C=O); 157.5 (N=C-H); 152.2 (C4'); 148.7 (C6 or C7a); 147.5 (C7a or C6); 141.6 (C1'); 135.2 (C5); 129.9 (C2'/C6'); 123.8 (C3'/C5'); 113.5 (C7); 111.9 (C3a); 100.4 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 314.9. Anal. Calcd. for C14H8N2O5S: C, 53.16; H, 2.55; N, 8.86%, Found: C, 52.73; H, 2.24; N, 8.86%.
(E)-6-Hydroxy-5-(3-nitrobenzylideneamino)benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4c). Yield: 73%; m.p. 220–222 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3330 (O-H); 1748 (C=O); 1591 (C=N); 1530 (N-O); 1353 (N-O). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.90 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.89–8.87 (m, 2H, H2'/N=C-H); 8.43 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, H4'); 8.36 (dd, 1H, 1J = 8.4; 2J = 1.6 Hz, H6'); 7.82 (t, 1H, J = 7.6; H5'); 7.68 (s, 1H, H7); 7.06 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.5 (C=O); 157.6 (N=C-H); 152.0 (C3'); 148.0 (C6 or C7a); 147.2 (C7a or C6); 137.6 (C1'); 135.1 (C5); 135.0 (C6'); 130.2 (C4'); 125.4 (C2'); 122.8 (C5'); 113.4 (C7); 111.6 (C3a); 100.2 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 314.7.
(E)-5-(4-Bromobenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4d). Yield: 64%; m.p. 211–213 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3362 (O-H); 1749 (C=O); 1622 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.67 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.69 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.98 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, H2'/H6'); 7.73 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, H3'/H5'); 7.63 (s, 1H, H7); 7.04 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.9 (C=O); 158.6 (N=C-H); 151.7 (C4'); 146.9 (C1'); 135.8 (C6 or C7a); 135.2 (C7a or C6); 131.8 (C3'/C5'); 130.8 (C2'/C6'); 125.1 (C5); 113.1 (C7); 111.6 (C3a); 100.2 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 347.8.
(E)-5-(3-Bromobenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4e). Yield: 46%; m.p. 179–180 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3334 (O-H); 1745 (C=O); 1625 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.70 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.70 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.34 (s, 1H, H2'); 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 8.0, H4'); 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 8.0; H6'); 7.65 (s, 1H, H7); 7.48 (t, 1H, J = 7.8; H5'); 7.05 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.6 (C=O); 158.1 (N=C-H); 151.0 (C6 or C7a); 147.1 (C7a or C6); 138.3 (C5); 135.4 (C1'); 133.9 (C4'); 130.8 (C2'); 130.7 (C5'); 128.5 (C6'); 122.2 (C3'); 113.1 (C7); 111.7 (C3a); 100.3 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 347.7.
(E)-5-(4-Chlorobenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4f). Yield: 60%; m.p. 210–212 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3354 (O-H); 1747 (C=O); 1624 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.66 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.70 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.05 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, H2'/H6'); 7.63 (s, 1H, H7); 7.59 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, H3'/H5'); 7.04 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.7 (C=O); 158.5 (N=C-H); 151.8 (C4'); 146.9 (C6 or C7a); 144.0 (C7a or C6); 135.8 (C5); 134.9 (C1'); 130.6 (C3'/C5'); 128.8 (C2'/C6'); 113.2 (C7); 111.7 (C3a); 100.2 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 303.8.
(E)-5-(2,4-Dichlorobenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4g). Yield: 82%; m.p. 221–223 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3366 (O-H); 1738 (C=O); 1593 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.86 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.97 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.42 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, H6'); 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, H3'); 7.72 (s, 1H, H7); 7.57 (dd, 1H, 1J = 8.5; 2J = 2.0; H5'); 7.04 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.6 (C=O); 154.1 (N=C-H); 151.9 (C6 or C7a); 147.2 (C7a or C6); 136.5 (C5); 135.6 (C1'); 135.4 (C6'); 131.8 (C4'); 130.2 (C2'); 129.3 (C5'); 127.7 (C3'); 113.8 (C7); 112.0 (C3a); 100.3 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 337.9.
(E)-5-(Benzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4h). Yield: 52%; m.p. 232–233 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3321 (O-H); 1720 (C=O); 1627 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.61 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.69 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.02 (dd, 2H, 1J = 7.5; 2J = 1.9; H2' or H6'); 7.61 (s, 1H, H7); 6.96 (m, 3H, H3' or H4' or H5'); 7.04 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.7 (C=O); 160.0 (N=C-H); 151.6 (C6 or C7a); 146.7 (C7a or C6); 136.2 (C5); 136.0 (C1'); 131.5 (C4'); 129.0 (C2'/C6'); 128.8 (C3'/C5'); 113.1 (C7); 111.6 (C3a); 100.1 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 270.2.
(E)-5-(4-(Dimethylamino)benzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4i). Yield: 64%; m.p. 199–201 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3307 (O-H); 1762 (C=O); 1594 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.30 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.47 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.83 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz, H2'/H6'); 7.53 (s, 1H, H7); 7.00 (s, 1H, H4); 6.78 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz, H3'/H5'); 3.02 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR ((CD3)2CO-d6, 75.0 MHz, ppm): δ 170.3 (C=O); 159.5 (N=C-H); 154.1 (C4'); 153.4 (C6 or C7a); 147.9 (C7a or C6); 136.9 (C5); 131.9 (C2'/C6'); 124.8 (C1'); 113.2 (C3a); 112.5 (C3'/C5'); 111.3 (C7); 100.0 (C4); 40.3 (CH3). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 313.1.
(E)-6-Hydroxy-5-(4-methoxybenzylideneamino)benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4j). Yield: 40%; m.p. 177–178 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3322 (O-H); 1744 (C=O); 1596 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.48 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.60 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.97 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz, H2'/H6'); 7.55 (s, 1H, H7); 7.07 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz, H3'/H5'); 7.02 (s, 1H, H4); 3.85 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.9 (C=O); 162.2 (C4'); 159.3 (N=C-H); 151.5 (C6 or C7a); 146.3 (C7a or C6); 136.6 (C5); 130.9 (C2'/C6'); 129.0 (C1'); 114.3 (C3'/C5'); 112.9 (C7); 111.6 (C3a); 100.1 (C4); 55.6 (CH3). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 300.0.
(E)-6-Hydroxy-5-(2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4k). Yield: 63%; m.p. 252–253 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3348 (O-H); 1765 (C=O); 1628 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 13.27 (s, 1H, O-H); 10.36 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.93 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.76 (s, 1H, H7); 7.62 (dd, 1H, 1J = 7.7; 2J = 1.6; H6’); 7.40 (m, 1H, H4'); 7.05 (s, 1H, H4); 6.96 (m, 2H, H3' or H5'). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.5 (C=O); 162.0 (N=C-H); 160.4 (C2'); 151.4 (C6 or C7a); 146.9 (C7a or C6); 133.8 (C5); 133.1 (C4'); 132.2 (C6'); 119.5 (C1'); 119.0 (C5'); 116.7 (C3'); 113.7 (C7); 112.0 (C3a); 100.6 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 286.1.
(E)-5-(2,3-Dihydroxybenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4l). Yield: 50%; m.p. 244–246 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3348 (O-H); 1730 (C=O); 1631 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 13.54 (s, 1H, O-H); 10.42 (s, 1H, O-H); 9.08 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.89 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.79 (s, 1H, H7); 7.04–7.05 (m, 2H, H4/H6'); 6.92 (d, 1H, J = 7.4; H4'); 6.77 (t, 1H, J = 7.4; H5'). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.6 (C=O); 161.9 (N=C-H); 151.4 (C2'); 149.9 (C3'); 146.8 (C6 or C7a); 145.8 (C7a or C6); 133.2 (C5); 122.4 (C6'); 119.3 (C5'); 118.6 (C1'); 118.5 (C4'); 113.5 (C7); 111.9 (C3a); 100.4 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 301.9.
(E)-5-(2,4-Dihydroxybenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4m). Yield: 40%; m.p. 284-285 °C (d). IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3370 (O-H); 1726 (C=O); 1625 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 13.67 (s, 1H, O-H); 10.23 (s, 1H, O-H); 10.18 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.74 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.68 (s, 1H, H7); 7.38 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, H6'); 7.01 (s, 1H, H4); 6.38 (dd, 1H, 1J = 8.5; 2J = 2.2; H5') 6.28 (d, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, H3'). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.7 (C=O); 163.6 (C4'); 162.5 (C2'); 161.2 (N=C-H); 151.0 (C6 or C7a); 149.6 (C7a or C6); 134.1 (C6'); 133.9 (C5); 113.3 (C5'); 112.3 (C1'); 111.8 (C3a); 107.8 (C7); 102.5 (C3'); 100.4 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 301.9. Anal. Calcd. for C14H9NO5S: C, 55.44; H, 2.99; N, 4.62%, Found: C, 55.60; H, 2.86; N, 4.83%.
(E)-5-(2,5-Dihydroxybenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4n). Yield: 60%; m.p. 261–263 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3301 (O-H); 1713 (C=O); 1612 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 12.40 (s, 1H, O-H); 10.28 (s, 1H, O-H); 9.03 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.81 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.72 (s, 1H, H7); 7.03 (s, 1H, H4); 6.99 (d, 1H, J = 3.0; H6'); 6.85 (dd, 1H, 1J = 8.8; 2J = 3.0; H4'); 6.78 (d, 1H, J = 8.8; H3'). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.6 (C=O); 161.7 (N=C-H); 153.1 (C2'); 151.4 (C5'); 149.5 (C6 or C7a); 146.7 (C7a or C6); 134.1 (C5); 121.0 (C3'); 119.4 (C4'); 117.2 (C6'); 116.5 (C1'); 113.7 (C7); 111.8 (C3a); 100.4 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 301.9. Anal. Calcd. for C14H9NO5S: C, 55.44; H, 2.99; N, 4.62%, Found: C, 55.53; H, 2.74; N, 4.56%.
(E)-6-Hydroxy-5-(2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzylideneamino)benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4o). Yield: 70%; m.p. 293–294 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3070 (O-H); 1763 (C=O); 1615 (C=N); 1542 (N-O); 1300 (N-O). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400.00 MHz, ppm): δ 14.86 (s, 1H, O-H); 10.72 (s, 1H, O-H); 9.15 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.64 (d, 1H, J = 2.9; H6'); 8.23 (dd, 1H, 1J = 9,3; 2J = 2.9; H4'); 7.85 (s, 1H, H7); 7.06 (m, 2H, H3'/H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.2 (C=O); 168.1 (C2'); 159.1 (N=C-H); 151.4 (C5'); 147.4 (C6 or C7a); 138.4 (C7a or C6); 130.8 (C5); 128.3 (C4'); 128.1 (C6'); 118.7 (C1'); 118.1 (C3'); 113.2 (C7); 112.1 (C3a); 100.3 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 330.8. Anal. Calcd. for C14H8N2O6S: C, 50.60; H, 2.43; N, 8.43%, Found: C, 50.27; H, 2.16; N, 8.35%.
(E)-5-(5-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4p). Yield: 58%; m.p. 250–252 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3442 (O-H); 1728 (C=O); 1617 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 13.15 (s, 1H, O-H); 10.37 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.92 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.88 (d, 1H, J = 2,5; H6'); 7.74 (s, 1H, H7); 7.53 (dd, 1H, 1J = 8.8; 2J = 2.5; H4'); 7.04 (s, 1H, H4); 6.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.8; H3').13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 125.0 MHz, ppm): δ 170.0 (C=O); 160.2 (N=C-H); 159.8 (C2'); 152.1 (C6 or C7a); 147.6 (C7a or C6); 135.7 (C4'); 134.0 (C6'); 133.7 (C5); 121.9 (C1'); 119.5 (C3'); 114.0 (C7); 112.3 (C3a); 110.2 (C5'); 100.9 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 365.9.
(E)-6-Hydroxy-5-(4-(pyridin-2-yl)benzylideneamino)benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4q). Yield: 32%; m.p. 201–203 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3397 (O-H); 1750 (C=O); 1618 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.67 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.76 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 8.72 (d, 1H, J = 4.6 Hz, H3''); 8.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz, H3'/H5'); 8.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz, H2'/H6'); 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H4''); 7.93 (td, 1H, 1J = 8.0; 2J = 1,8 Hz, H6''); 7.66 (s, 1H, H7); 7.40 (dd, 1H, 1J = 8.0; 2J = 4,6 Hz, H5''); 7.05 (s, 1H, H4). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.6 (C=O); 159.2 (N=C-H); 155.1 (C1''); 151.7 (C6 or C7a); 149.6 (C3''); 146.7 (C7a or C6); 141.2 (C4'); 137.2 (C6''); 136.4 (C5 or C1'); 136.1 (C1' or C5); 129.3 (C2'/C6'); 126.6 (C3'/C5'); 123.0 (C5''); 120.6 (C4''); 113.1 (C7); 111.6 (C3a); 100.1 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 347.1.
(E)-5-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethyleneamino)-6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (4r). Yield: 40%; m.p. 232–233 °C. IR (KBr, ν cm−1) 3346 (O-H); 1752 (C=O); 1625 (C=N). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500.00 MHz, ppm): δ 9.45 (s, 1H, O-H); 8.59 (s, 1H, N=C-H); 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz, H2'); 7.61 (s, 1H, H7); 7.42 (dd, 1H, 1J = 8.0; 2J = 1.4 Hz, H6'); 7.05 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H5'); 7.05 (s, 1H, H4); 6.12 (s, 2H, H1''). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.0 MHz, ppm): δ 169.7 (C=O); 158.6 (N=C-H); 151.8 (C4'); 150.2 (C3'); 148.0 (C6 or C7a); 146.5 (C7a or C6); 135.8 (C5); 130.9 (C1'); 126.4 (C6'); 112.5 (C3a); 111.6 (C2'); 108.2 (C7); 106.7 (C5'); 101.7 (C1''); 100.0 (C4). ESI-MS: m/z [M−H]−: 314.1.

3.5. Cytotoxicity against Cancer Cell Lines

Compounds (0.312–20 μM) were tested for cytotoxic activity against three cancer cell lines: ACP-03 (gastric), SKMEL-19 (melanoma) and HCT-116 (colon). All cell lines were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μM streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Each compound was dissolved in DMSO and diluted with water to obtain a concentration of 20 μM. They were incubated with the cells for 72 h. The negative control received the same amount of DMSO (0.005% in the highest concentration). Doxorrubicin was used as a positive control. The cell viability was determined by reduction of the yellow dye 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazol)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) to a blue formazan product after 48 h as described by Mosmann [35].

3.6. Cell Membrane Disruption

The test was performed in 96-well plates using a 2% mouse erythrocyte suspension in 0.85% NaCl containing 10 mM CaCl2. The compounds diluted as mentioned above were tested at concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 200 μg/mL. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min and centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the liberated hemoglobin was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. DMSO was used as a negative control and Triton X-100 (1%) was used as positive control. EC50 is the calculated effective dose that induced lysis on 50% that of the Triton X-100 [37].

3.7. Molecular Modeling

The lowest-energy conformer was obtained through the equilibrium conformer calculation of the Spartan’10 program [42] at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of theory. Thereafter, the obtained conformer (isomer E) and the isomer Z were fully optimized at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory using the Gaussian 09W program [43]. Since no imaginary frequency was found, the optimized structures were characterized as minima.

4. Conclusions

A series of new 6-hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one derivatives has been synthesized in good yields from commercially available materials and screened for their in vitro anticancer activity against three cancer cell lines. Results pointed Schiff base 4o as the most active for melanoma (SKMEL-19), suggesting the importance of the nitro and hydroxyl groups for the cytotoxicity. The absence of hemolytic effects indicates that the mechanism of cytotoxicity of the substances is not related with membrane disruption and is probably related to more specific pathways of the cells. These preliminary results encourage further investigation on 6-hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one derivatives aiming at the discovery of more potent antitumorals.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/02/1968/s1.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank FAPERJ, UFF, Farmanguinhos/FIOCRUZ and UFPA for financial support. Fellowships granted to E.L.C., E.B.L. and W.T.V.J. by CAPES, to P.S.S. by FAPERJ and to R.M.R.B., R.C.M. and T.R.A.V. by CNPq.

Author Contributions

E.L.C. contributed with the synthetic work, spectral data analysis, literature research and wrote the manuscript. P.S.S. contributed with the synthetic work. W.T.V.J. contributed with the synthetic work, literature research and reviewed the manuscript. E.B.L., J.D.Y. and K.Z.L. performed molecular modeling studies, discussed results and wrote the manuscript. L.C.P., R.M.R.B. and R.C.M. executed cytotoxic experiments, discussed results and wrote the manuscript. J.L.W. and S.M.S.V.W. performed crystallography studies, discussed results and wrote the manuscript. C.R.B.G. and T.R.A.V. planned the synthetic route, designed the new derivatives, discussed results, wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Notes

  1. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. Available online: http://www1.inca.gov.br/vigilancia/ (accessed on 6 August 2014).
  2. Jemal, A.; Bray, F.; Center, M.M.; Ferlay, J.; Ward, E.; Forman, D. Global cancer statistics. Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 69–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html (accessed on 6 August 2014).
  4. Caleta, I.; Kralj, M.; Marjanovic, M.; Bertosa, B.; Tomic, S.; Pavilovic, G.; Pavelic, K.; Karminski-Zamola, G. Novel cyano- and amidinobenzothiazole derivatives: Synthesis, antitumor evaluation, and X-ray and quantitative structure—Activity relationship (QSAR) analysis. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1744–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vellasco J&#xFA;nior, W.T.; Gomes, C.R.B.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A. Chemistry and biological activities of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-ones. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2011, 8, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shadyro, O.I.; Timoshchuk, V.A.; Polozov, G.I.; Povalishev, V.N.; Andreeva, O.T.; Zhelobkovich, V.E. Synthesis and antiviral activity of spatially-screened phenols: 1,3-Benzoxathiolan-2-one derivatives. Pharm. Chem. J. 1999, 33, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Konieczny, M.T.; Konieczny, W.; Sabisz, M.; Skladanowski, A.; Wakieć, R.; Augustynowicz-Kopeć, E.; Zwolska, S. Synthesis of isomeric, oxathiolone fused chalcones, and comparison of their activity toward various microorganisms and human cancer cells line. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Konieczny, M.T.; Konieczny, W.; Sabisz, M.; Skladanowski, A.; Wakie&#x107;, R.; Augustynowicz-Kope&#x107;, E.; Zwolska, S. Acid-catalyzed synthesis of oxathiolone fused chalcones. Comparison of their activity toward various microorganisms and human cancer cells line. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 729–733. [Google Scholar]
  9. Da Silva, C.M.; da Silva, D.L.; Modolo, L.V.; Alves, R.; de Resende, M.A.; Martins, C.V.B.; de F&#xE1;tima, A. Schiff bases: A short review of their antimicrobial activities. J. Adv. Res. 2011, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rana, K.; Pandurangan, A.; Singh, N.; Tiwari, A.K. A systemic review of schiff bases as an analgesic, anti-inflammatory. Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 2012, 4, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferreira, M.L.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; de Carvalho, E.M.; Lourenço, M.C.S.; Wardell, S.M.S.V.; Wardell, J.L.; Ferreira, V.F.; de Souza, M.V.N. Synthesis and antitubercular activity of novel Schiff bases derived from d-mannitol. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 2042–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shi, L.; Ge, H.-M.; Tan, S.-H.; Li, H.-Q.; Song, Y.-C.; Zhu, H.-L.; Tan, R.-X. Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of Schiff bases derived from 5-chloro-salicylaldehyde. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anand, P.; Patil, V.M.; Sharma, V.K.; Khosa, R.L.; Masand, N. Schiff bases: A review on biological insights. Int. J. Drug Des. Discov. 2012, 3, 851–868. [Google Scholar]
  14. Junior, I.N.; Lourenço, M.C.S.; Henriques, M.G.M.O.; Ferreira, B.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; Peralta, M.A.; de Oliveira, P.S.M.; Wardell, S.M.S.V.; de Souza, M.V.N. Synthesis and anti-mycobacterial activity of N'-[(E)-(disubstituted-phenyl)methylidene]isonicotino-hydrazide derivatives. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2005, 2, 563–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wardell, S.M.S.V.; de Souza, M.V.N.; Ferreira, M.L.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; Low, J.N.; Glidewell, C. Pi-Stacked hydrogen-bonded chains of rings in 2,4-difluorobenzaldehyde isonicotinoylhydrazone and hydrogen-bonded sheets in 2,3-dichlorobenzaldehyde isonicotinoylhydrazone. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2005, 61, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lourenço, M.C.S.; Ferreira, M.L.; de Souza, M.V.N.; Peralta, M.A.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; Henriques, M.G.M.O. Synthesis and anti-mycobacterial activity of (E)-N'-(monosubstituted-benzylidene)isonicotinohydrazide derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 1344–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nogueira, A.F.; Azevedo, E.C.; Ferreira, V.F.; Ara&#xFA;jo, A.J.; Santos, E.A.; Pessoa, C.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Montenegro, R.C.; Moraes, M.O.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; et al. Synthesis and antitumor evaluation of (E)-2-benzothiazole hydrazones. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2010, 7, 551–555. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nogueira, A.F.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; Wardell, J.L.; Wardell, S.M.S.V. Crystal structures of hydrazones, 2-(1,3-benzothiazolyl)-NH-N=CH-Ar, prepared from arenealdehydes and 2-hydrazinyl-1,3-benzothiazole. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2011, 226, 846–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lindgren, E.B.; Yoneda, J.D.; Leal, K.Z.; Nogueira, A.F.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; Wardell, J.L.; Wardell, S.M.S.V. Structures of hydrazones, (E)-2-(1,3-benzothiazolyl)-NH-N=CH-Ar, [Ar = 4-(pyridin-2-yl)phenyl, pyrrol-2-yl, thien-2-yl and furan-2-yl]: Difference in conformations and intermolecular hydrogen bonding. J. Mol. Struct. 2013, 1036, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reis, R.R.; Azevedo, E.C.; de Souza, M.C.B.V.; Ferreira, V.F.; Montenegro, R.C.; Ara&#xFA;jo, A.J.; Pessoa, C.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Moraes, M.O.; Filho, J.D.B.M.; et al. Synthesis and anticancer activities of some novel 2-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-8-substituted-2H-pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinolin-3(5H)-ones. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 1448–1452. [Google Scholar]
  21. Facchinetti, V.; Reis, R.R.; Gomes, C.R.B.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A. Chemistry and biological activities of 1,3-benzothiazoles. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2012, 9, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Facchinetti, V.; Gomes, C.R.B.; de Souza, M.V.N.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A. Perspectives on the development of novel potentially active quinolones against tuberculosis and cancer. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lindgren, E.B.; Brito, M.A.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.; Moraes, M.O.; Montenegro, R.C.; Yoneda, J.D.; Leal, K.Z. Synthesis and anticancer activity of (E)-2-benzothiazole hydrazones. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 86, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sathunuru, R.; Rao, U.N.; Biehl, E. Facile, high-yield, regioselective synthesis of ortho-nitrophenols using cerium (IV) ammonium nitrate. ARKIVOC 2003, 2003, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fox, B.A.; Threlfall, T.L. 2,3-Diaminopyridine. Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. 1973, 5, 346–351. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bellamy, F.D.; Ou, K. Reduction of aromatic nitro compounds with stannous chloride in non-acidic and non-aqueous medium. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 839–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramadas, K.; Srinavasan, N. Iron-ammonium chloride—A convenient and inexpensive reductant. Synth. Commun. 1992, 22, 3189–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Data for compound 4q were obtained at 100(2) K with Mo-Kα radiation by means of the Rigaku Saturn724+ (2x2 bin mode). Data collection, data reduction and unit cell refinement were carried out under the control of the program CrystalClear-SM Expert 2.0 r7 [29]. Data were collected at the NCS Crystallographic Service, based at the University of Southampton. Correction for absorption was achieved by a semi-empirical method based upon the variation of equivalent reflections [29]. The programs ORTEP-3 for Windows [30] and MERCURY [31] were used in the preparation of the Figures. SHELXL97 [32] and PLATON [33] were used in the calculation of molecular geometry. The structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97 [32] and fully refined by means of the program SHELXL-97 [32]. All hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions.
  29. CrystalClear; Rigaku Inc.: The Woodlands, TX, USA, 2010.
  30. Flack, H.D. On enantiomorph-polarity estimation. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 1983, 39, 876–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. MERCURY 3.01; Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: Cambridge, UK, 2013.
  32. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Spek, A.L. Single-crystal structure validation with the program PLATON. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Crystal data collected at 100(2)K, colourless crystal: 0.04 × 0.04 × 0.01 mm. Formula: C19H12N22O3S; M = 348.38; orthorhombic, Pbcn; a = 18.336(6) Å, b = 11.547(4) Å, c = 14.303(5) Å, Z = 8, V = 3028.3(18) Å3, independent reflections 2671 [R(int) = 0.36], 1197 observed reflections [I > 2 σ (I)]: Parameters refined 2671; number of restraints 0; R(F) 0.102 [I > 2 σ (I)], Largest diff. peak 0.36 Å_1. Atomic coordinates, bond lengths, angles and thermal parameters have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, deposition number 984867.
  35. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. NCI/NIH Developmental Therapeutcs Program. Available online: http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/branches/btb/handlingprep.html (accessed on 20 August 2014).
  37. Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Cunha, G.M.A.; Farias, P.A.M.; Viana, G.S.B.; Cunha, K.M.A.; Pessoa, C.; Moraes, M.O.; Silveira, E.R.; Gramosa, N.V.; Rao, V.S.N.; et al. The cytotoxic and embryotoxic effects of kaurenoic acid, a diterpene isolated from Copaifera langsdorffii oleo-resin. Toxicon 2002, 40, 1231–1234. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Veber, D.F.; Johnson, S.R.; Cheng, H.; Smith, B.R.; Ward, K.W.; Kopple, K.D. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ke, W.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, R.; Jiang, C.; Pei, Y. Enhanced oral bioavailability of doxorubicin in a dendrimer drug delivery system. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 2208–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Benival, D.M.; Devarajan, P.V. Lipomer of doxorubicin hydrochloride for enhanced oral bioavailability. Int. J. Pharm. 2012, 423, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Spartan’10; Wavefunction Inc.: Irvine, CA, USA, 2011.
  43. Gaussian 09; Revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2013.
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 2, 3 and 4a–r are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chazin, E.D.L.; Sanches, P.D.S.; Lindgren, E.B.; Vellasco Júnior, W.T.; Pinto, L.C.; Burbano, R.M.R.; Yoneda, J.D.; Leal, K.Z.; Gomes, C.R.B.; Wardell, J.L.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 6-Hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one Schiff Bases as Potential Anticancer Agents. Molecules 2015, 20, 1968-1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20021968

AMA Style

Chazin EDL, Sanches PDS, Lindgren EB, Vellasco Júnior WT, Pinto LC, Burbano RMR, Yoneda JD, Leal KZ, Gomes CRB, Wardell JL, et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 6-Hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one Schiff Bases as Potential Anticancer Agents. Molecules. 2015; 20(2):1968-1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20021968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chazin, Eliza De Lucas, Paola De Souza Sanches, Eric Brazil Lindgren, Walcimar Trindade Vellasco Júnior, Laine Celestino Pinto, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano, Julliane Diniz Yoneda, Kátia Zaccur Leal, Claudia Regina Brandão Gomes, James Lewis Wardell, and et al. 2015. "Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 6-Hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one Schiff Bases as Potential Anticancer Agents" Molecules 20, no. 2: 1968-1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20021968

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop