Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Constitution of the Crude, Phenolic-Rich Extracts of Hibiscus sabdariffa, Brassica oleracea and Beta vulgaris
Next Article in Special Issue
Pterostilbene Suppresses both Cancer Cells and Cancer Stem-Like Cells in Cervical Cancer with Superior Bioavailability to Resveratrol
Previous Article in Journal
Reductive Metabolism of Ellagitannins in the Young Leaves of Castanopsis sieboldii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isolation, Structure Elucidation, and Antiproliferative Activity of Butanolides and Lignan Glycosides from the Fruit of Hernandia nymphaeifolia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 23
10.3390/molecules24234278
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antiangiogenic Effects of Coumarins against Cancer: From Chemistry to Medicine

by
Mohammad Bagher Majnooni
1,
Sajad Fakhri
2,
Antonella Smeriglio
3,
Domenico Trombetta
3,
Courtney R. Croley
4,
Piyali Bhattacharyya
5,
Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez
6,7,
Mohammad Hosein Farzaei
2,* and
Anupam Bishayee
4,*
1
Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6714415153, Iran
2
Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6734667149, Iran
3
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy
4
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA
5
Escuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Ana G. Méndez, Recinto de Gurabo, Gurabo, PR 00778, USA
6
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
7
Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago 8330507, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(23), 4278; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234278
Submission received: 27 October 2019 / Revised: 18 November 2019 / Accepted: 19 November 2019 / Published: 24 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antitumor and Anti-HIV Agents from Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Angiogenesis, the process of formation and recruitment of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, plays an important role in the development of cancer. Therefore, the use of antiangiogenic agents is one of the most critical strategies for the treatment of cancer. In addition, the complexity of cancer pathogenicity raises the need for multi-targeting agents. Coumarins are multi-targeting natural agents belonging to the class of benzopyrones. Coumarins have several biological and pharmacological effects, including antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammation, anticoagulant, anxiolytic, analgesic, and anticancer properties. Several reports have shown that the anticancer effect of coumarins and their derivatives are mediated through targeting angiogenesis by modulating the functions of vascular endothelial growth factor as well as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, which are involved in cancer pathogenesis. In the present review, we focus on the antiangiogenic effects of coumarins and related structure-activity relationships with particular emphasis on cancer.

1. Introduction

Angiogenesis (also known as neovascularization), the growth of blood vessels from the existing vasculature, has been shown to play a critical role in the development of various diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic retinopathy, asthma, endometriosis, psoriasis, obesity, and cancer [1,2,3]. Inflammation, tissue ischemia, and hypoxia which cause the release of the angiogenesis factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, and nitric oxide (NO), are among the most important triggers of angiogenesis [4]. In 1971, Folkman reported that tumor metastasis occurs as a consequence of angiogenesis [5]. This was the starting point for the design and use of bevacizumab, thalidomide, sunitinib, and axitinib as antiangiogenic drugs in the treatment of a variety of cancers [6,7,8]. Considering the crucial role of angiogenesis in the progression of cancer, investigating novel and potential antiangiogenic compounds is of great importance to combat cancer. Several naturally occurring compounds, including vinblastine, vincristine, paclitaxel, were reported as antiangiogenic and anticancer agents. Besides, other natural compounds with antiangiogenic activities, such as resveratrol, artemisinin, boswellic acid, and cannabidiol, have shown enormous potential for cancer prevention and therapy [9,10,11,12,13]. For instance, endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol showed a promising anticancer effect in several cell lines [14]. Overall, cancer remains a clinical challenge, despite advancements in its treatment. This raises the need to investigate novel multi-target agents to attenuate multiple signaling pathways involved in tumor progression.
Growing evidence has introduced coumarins as potential multi-targeting agents with various pharmacological effects and medicinal uses [15]. Coumarins, with their 2H-1-benzopyran-2-one structure, are natural compounds that exist in various plant families, including Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Rutaceae, Moraceae, Oleaceae, and Thymelaeaceae [16]. Apiaceae is the greatest family of plants containing coumarin compounds [16]. Also, due to the antioxidant [17], anti-inflammatory [18], anxiolytic [19], analgesic [20], neuroprotective [21], cardioprotective [22], antidiabetic [23], and anticancer [24] activities of coumarins [25], researchers have studied the synthesis of various coumarin derivatives, in addition to their purification from natural sources [26]. Both synthetic and natural coumarins have shown noticeable anticancer effects in vitro and in vivo through various mechanisms [27], including the inhibition of angiogenesis [28,29]. From a mechanistic point of view, some coumarins have shown promising antiangiogenic effects through the interaction with and repression of signaling mediators involved in angiogenesis [30,31].
In this review, we focus on the cellular signaling pathways of angiogenesis and recent pharmacological antiangiogenic agents, emphasizing natural and synthetic coumarins with antiangiogenic effects as well as their pharmacological mechanisms and structure-activity relationship in cancer.

2. Angiogenesis: Biology and Cellular Signaling

Angiogenesis could be controlled by achieving a balance among activating cytokines and growth factors on one hand and inhibiting agents on the other, which stimulate or inhibit endothelial cells (ECs), respectively. Proangiogenic agents include growth factors, namely, VEGF, fibroblast growth factors, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), placental growth factor (PGF), hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), and cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) [32,33,34,35]. ECs, fibroblasts, platelets, smooth muscle cells, inflammatory cells, and cancer cells are involved in producing angiogenic growth factors and cytokines [4].
VEGF and FGF have been considered as promising antiangiogenic targets [35]. VEGF mainly acts through tyrosine kinase VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) [36]. Furthermore, bioactive lipids, such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), matrix degenerating enzymes, namely, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and heparinases, small mediators (e.g., NO, peroxynitrite, serotonin, and histamine), angiopoietins (Ang), and erythropoietin are among other activators of angiogenesis [35]. In order to attract other angiogenesis-stimulating factors, cancer cells induce a situation of hypoxia by increasing the demand for nutrients and oxygen. In the hypoxic condition, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), together with released anti-apoptotic factors, growth factors, and cytokines, provokes angiogenesis [4,37].
On the other hand, angiogenesis could be suppressed by inhibiting proteins, which are classified into either direct or indirect angiogenesis inhibitors. The first class of inhibitors directly suppress ECs in the growing vasculature, while the second class indirectly suppress either tumor cells or other tumor-associated stromal cells [35,38]. This direct inhibitory effect could also be mediated by integrin receptors through several intracellular signaling pathways [39]. Angiostatin, endostatin, arrestin, canstatin, and tumstatin are released by the proteolysis of distinct endothelial cell-matrix molecules and prevent vascular ECs from proliferating and migrating in response to angiogenesis inducers [40]. Interferons, retinoic acid, IL-1, IL-12, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, and multimerin 2 are other angiogenesis inhibitors [41,42].
As previously mentioned, angiogenesis is controlled by a balance between activators and inhibitors of angiogenesis. Hypoxia, as a critical determinant, causes an imbalance between activators and inhibitors by inducing the upregulation of HIF-1α, which elevates the expression of pro-angiogenesis agents as well as suppresses the expression of angiogenesis inhibitors [43]. Therefore, all the mediators in these pathways could be therapeutic targets to inhibit angiogenesis.

3. Recent Advancement in Pharmacological Antiangiogenic Agents

Several angiogenesis inhibitors have been found since Folkman first presented the concept of introducing angiogenesis inhibitors as anticancer drugs [5]. RNA interference (RNAi) therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, gene therapy, and pharmacological agents are auspicious antiangiogenic interventions [44]. According to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), approved antiangiogenic agents are classified into two major groups, namely, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small molecules [45].
VEGF receptors (VEGFRs) and related downstream signaling pathways are crucial targets of mAbs. Small molecules also target receptors, including PDGFR, VEGFR, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3, and c-Kit receptor, and signaling proteins such as Raf, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K). Besides, the antiangiogenic/anticancer effects of FDA-approved herbal drugs, including vinca [46], taxan [47], camptothecins [48], podophyllotoxins [49], and homoharringtonine [50], related receptors, and downstream signaling pathways have now been confirmed [13].
VEGF (A–D), PDGF (A–D), HGF [51,52], and FGF [53,54] bind to VEGFR (1 and 2), PDGFR (α and β), MET [55,56], and FGFR (1-4) tyrosine kinase receptors, respectively, and activate downstream signaling pathways, thereby regulating cell growth, differentiation, and angiogenesis [54,57,58,59]. Their overactivation is attributed to several mutations promoting tumor vascularization in different types of cancers [60,61], while their inhibitors exert antitumor effects [62]. Bevacizumab, aflibercept, and ramucirumab have been developed as antiangiogenic agents to target the VEGF/VEGFR signaling pathway [63].
Angiopoietins (Ang1–4) bind to the Tie2 receptor. While Ang1 helps the vessels stabilize, Ang2 is secreted by ECs in response to proangiogenic factors, including hypoxia, cytokines, and inflammation [64]. Ang/Tie2-targeted therapy is challenging, since it could be either antitumor or protumor, depending on the context [65].
The rearranged during transfection (RET) protein binds receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) associated with normal development, maintenance, and maturation of cells and tissues [66]. However, its mutation is related to the growth and progression of tumors [66,67]. Therefore, RET inhibition could be of great importance in combating cancer.
Multi-targeting antiangiogenic drugs are shown in Figure 1. These drugs exert anticancer effects through simultaneously modulating several signaling pathways involved in angiogenesis.

4. Coumarins

4.1. Chemical Structure and Sources

Coumarin (C9H6O2, 2H-1-benzopyran-2-one, 146.145 g/mol) and its derivatives (Figure 2) are a large class of natural compounds that are widely distributed in the plant kingdom and are biosynthesized from ortho-hydroxy-cinnamic acid in the shikimic acid pathways [68]. In terms of chemical structure, coumarins are subdivided into four main groups: (a) simple coumarins, such as heparin and scopoletin; (b) furanocoumarins (linear and angular), such as bergapten and imperatorin; (c) pyranocoumarins, such as grandivittin and agasyllin; (d) dicoumarins and pyrone-substituted coumarins, such as phenylcoumarins (Figure 2) [69,70,71].
Coumarins are isolated and purified from fruits, leaves, stems, roots, and flowers of more than 40 plant families. The Apiaceae represents a family of plants with the highest number of species producing coumarins, including Anethum graveolens, Angelica dahurica, Apium graveolens, Petroselinum crispum and Heracleum mantegazzianum. Other plant families producing coumarins are Rutaceae (Citrus aurantium, Citrus sinensis, and Melicope glabra), Asteraceae (Matricaria recutita and Achillea millefolium), Fabaceae (Melilotus officinalis and Glycyrriza glabra), and Moraceae (Ficus carica) [16,72,73,74,75,76].

4.2. Biological and Pharmacological Effects of Coumarins

Coumarins have several biological and pharmacological effects. For example, coumarins isolated from the bark of M. glabra showed antioxidant properties [73]. In this line, antimicrobial effects of coumarins from the fruits of H. mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier as well as Peucedanum luxurians Tamamsch were reported [76,77]. Antiviral effects of coumarins isolated from Prangos ferulacea L. have been shown by Shokoohinia et al. [78]. In addition, anxiolytic effects of coumarin derivatives, purified from the root of Biebersteinia multifida DC, have been demonstrated [79]. Other coumarins, such as umbelliferone and pimpinellin, were isolated from the root of Zosima absinthifolia and these compounds showed anti-Alzheimer effects [80]. Kontogiorgis and co-workers [81] designed and synthesized coumarin derivatives based on azomethine, with anti-inflammatory activities. Synthesized coumarins based on 3,4-dihydro-2H-benzothiazines showed analgesic effects in formalin- and acetic acid-induced writhing tests [82]. Additionally, various coumarins have shown antiulcerogenic [83], spasmolytic [84], anticoagulant [85], vasorelaxant [86], cytotoxic, and anticancer activities [87].
On the other hand, hepatotoxicity, nausea, and diarrhea were reported as the side effects of coumarin derivatives [88,89].

4.3. Coumarins as Anticancer Agents

As the second leading cause of death worldwide, cancer is one of the most critical diseases that threaten public health and imposes a high cost on countries’ health systems each year. Because of the resistance of cancer cells to conventional drugs used in chemotherapy as well as the side effects of these drugs, it is necessary to find new anticancer agents. Undoubtedly, medicinal plants are one of the richest sources of biologically active compounds and potential novel anticancer drugs. Coumarins are natural compounds with low to moderate side effects, which have been introduced by researchers as promising anticancer compounds [29,90,91,92]. Several coumarins also inhibit cytochrome P450, thereby affecting the blood concentration of various anticancer drugs. In this line, bergamottin inhibits cytochrome P450 and reduces the effects of various carcinogenic agents [93].
The anticancer and cytotoxic activities of synthetic and natural coumarins with different functional groups on their basic structure (Figure 2) have been reported by several investigators. These studies showed the anticancer activity of coumarins against breast cancer [89], colon cancer [94], lung cancer [24], ovarian cancer [95], hepatocellular carcinoma [96], bladder carcinoma [97], leukemia [98], and other types of cancer in vitro and in vivo, via different mechanisms, including free-radical scavenging, antioxidant activity [99], induction of cell cycle arrest [100], interaction with various signaling pathways with important role in cell differentiation and proliferation [101], telomerase and carbonic anhydrase inhibition [102,103], and antiangiogenic activity [104]. For example, Taniguchi and co-workers [105] isolated eight coumarins from the leaves of Rhizophora mucronata and reported the anticancer effects of methoxyinophyllum P, calocoumarin B, and calophyllolide against HeLa cells (cervical cancer), with IC50 equal to 3.8, 29.9, and 36.4 μM, respectively, and HL-60 cells (promyelocytic leukemia cells) with IC50 of 12.9, 2.6, and 2.2 μM, respectively. Also, three hemiterpene ether coumarins, isolated from Artemisia armeniaca Lam, showed cytotoxic effects in HL-60 and K562 cells (chronic myelogenous leukemia cells). In their study, armenin showed the highest cytotoxic effect through cycle arrest, with IC50 equal to 22.5 and 71.1 µM for K562 and HL-60 cells, respectively [106].
Among coumarins, clausarin, nordentatin, dentatin, and xanthoxyletin, isolated from dichloromethane extraction of root bark of Clausena harmandiana, showed high cytotoxic activities [107]. In this study, clausarin (Figure 2) showed the highest cytotoxic activity, which was superior to that of cisplatin used as a positive control, against hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2, IC50 = 17.6 ± 2.1 μM), colorectal carcinoma (HCT116, IC50 = 44.9 ± 1.4 μM), and lung adenocarcinoma (SK-LU-1, IC50 = 6.9 ± 1.6 μM) cell lines. Clausarin also showed the highest antioxidant activity in the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate scavenging assay. From a mechanistic point of view, apoptosis induction was reported as an anticancer mechanism of coumarins [107].
On the other hand, several studies have been carried out on the synthesis of coumarins to produce coumarin derivatives with improved anticancer effects. Among them, synthetic scopoletin derivatives have shown promising antitumor activities. In their study, out of 20 synthesized derivatives of scopoletin, 5 compounds showed the greatest effects (IC50 < 2 µM) in MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 cells (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line) as well as in HT29 cells (human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line). The relationship between the increase in Log P value and the increase in cytotoxic activity was established in this investigation. Cell cycle arrest was also suggested as the anticancer mechanism of these compounds [108].
Besides, Zang et al. [105] synthesized novel anticancer analogs of geiparvarin using a bioisosteric transformation method. In their study, it was also shown that adding electron-withdrawing substituents to the benzene rings, such as 7-((1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-4Hchromen-4-one (Figure 2), increased their cytotoxic effects in a human hepatoma cell line (QGY-7701, IC50 = 14.37 ± 9.93) and a colon carcinoma cell line (SW480, IC50 = 11.18 ± 2.16) compared with geiparvarin (IC50 = 17.68 ± 0.40 and 20.34 ± 0.75, respectively) [109]. Additionally, Cui and co-workers [110] showed the anticancer effects of three synthesized coumarins derived from triphenylethylene, occurring through the inhibition of angiogenesis.
Considering the above investigations on the anticancer effects of coumarin derivatives, these compounds could be developed as anticancer drugs.

5. Coumarin and Angiogenesis Inhibition

Inhibition of angiogenesis is one of the most critical anticancer mechanisms of secondary plant metabolites, including coumarins. Natural and synthetic coumarins with different structures can inhibit the factors involved in angiogenesis, migration, proliferation, and differentiation of endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Coumarins act by blocking various molecular signaling pathways, involving growth factors (e.g., VEGFs, TNF-α, and FGF-2), cytokines (e.g., IL-1 and IL-6), angiogenic enzymes (e.g., MMP), endothelial-specific receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g., Tie2), and adhesion molecules (e.g., intercellular adhesion molecule-1) [30,111,112].

5.1. Natural Coumarins with Antiangiogenic Effects

The antiangiogenic effects of coumarins from natural sources, especially isolated and purified from plants, are reported in several studies. Scopoletin [113,114], esculetin [104], herniarin [115], decursin, and decursinol [116] with coumarin structure, as well as imperatorin [117] and psoralidine [118] with furanocoumarin structure (Figure 2), are among the natural antiangiogenic coumarins.
Pan and co-workers [119] showed the antiangiogenic effects of scopoletin, isolated from Erycibe obtusifolia Benth stem, in vitro and in vivo. In their study, scopoletin markedly reduced the number of blood vessel branch points after a 48-h treatment with the dose of 100 nmol/egg in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model. Additionally, the inhibitory effects of scopoletin on migration, proliferation, and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) induced by VEGF (10 ng/mL) were observed. These investigators showed that the proliferation of HUVECs was significantly inhibited by 100 µM scopoletin after 72 h, and tube formation and migration of HUVECs were inhibited following treatment with 100 µM scopoletin by 52.4% and 38.1%, respectively [119].
Decursin and decursinol angelate, isolated from Angelica gigas root, showed substantial antiangiogenic effects in vitro and in vivo [120]. These natural coumarins significantly decreased the development of blood vessels in transgenic zebrafish embryos at 20 µM concentration as well as in the CAM model at 6 µM/egg. In their study, the inhibition of VEGFR2 (one of the most important receptors of VEGF) and other angiogenesis signaling pathway related to VGEF, such as phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK) and MAPK as well as phosphorylated-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in ECs were observed [116].
The antiangiogenic effect of marmesin (Figure 2), a furanocoumarin isolated from ethanolic extract of the twigs of Broussonetia kazinoki, was reported by Kim et al. [121]. They showed that marmesin at 10 µM significantly inhibited the expression and activity of MMP-2 in response to VEGF-A (10 ng/mL) in HUVECs. Besides, marmesin reduced EC proliferation, migration, invasion, tube formation and also induced cell cycle arrest in a concentration-dependent manner. Marmesin at 10 µM also inhibited the development of angiogenesis in the rat aortic ring model. VEGF-A stimulated various critical molecules of angiogenesis signaling pathways, such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK), Src kinase, MEK, ERK, Akt, and p70S6K. These pathways were inhibited by 10 µM marmesin [121]. In another study, osthol, columbianadin and columbianetin acetate, three coumarins isolated from Angelicae Pubescentis Radix, showed inhibitory effects on the secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, a pro-inflammation factor and one of the most important migration-regulating chemokines [122]. On the other hand, conferone, a sesquiterpene coumarin isolated from Ferula szwitziana, showed antiangiogenic and cytotoxic effects on a human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line (HT-29) through reducing proangiogenic factors, including angiopoietin 1 and 2 [123]. Besides, daphnetin (7,8-hydroxy coumarin), another natural coumarin, inhibited the expression of MAPK, VEGFR2, ERK1/2, AKT, FAK, and cSrc, which are involved in angiogenesis [124] (Table 1). Also, inhibiting PI3K/AKT activity, another angiogenesis inducer pathway, is one of the antiangiogenic mechanisms of murrangatin purified from Micromelum falcatum [125]. Moreover, reducing and blocking VEGF and MMPs are among the most important antiangiogenic mechanisms of coumarins such as galbanic acid [126], umbelliprenin [127], imperatorin [117], auraptene [128], esculetin [31], osthole [129], and scopolin [130] (Table 1).

5.2. Synthetic Coumarins with Antiangiogenic Effects

Angiogenesis is a critical process in the development and progression of cancer, as demonstrated by various pre-clinical and clinical evidence. Among natural-based entities, coumarins present little cytotoxicity, while demonstrating more powerful antiangiogenic effects than conventional cytotoxic drugs [131,132]. Semi-synthesized and synthesized products from natural coumarins, used as lead compounds, led to the discovery of interesting antiangiogenic and non-cytotoxic molecules. Coumarins with interesting antiangiogenic and non-cytotoxic properties almost entirely mimic the behavior of the physiological ligands of the main therapeutic targets [132]. Recently, several sulfonyl derivatives of coumarins have been studied as cytotoxic and antiangiogenic agents against HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. All synthesized coumarins showed no cytotoxic effect but exhibited a high antimigration activity through the inhibition of MMP-2. CD105 was over-expressed in all cases and, therefore, was not involved in the antimigration activity [132]. In other cases, no statistically significant difference in gene expression of CD44 was found. A synthesized coumarin, 2-oxo-2H-chromene-6-sulfonyl derivative, was found to be the most promising antiangiogenic agent, since it was able to inhibit the migratory activity mediated by MMP-2 and down-regulate CD105; however, it did not show any effect on CD44.
On the other hand, the antiangiogenic capacity of several sulfonyl derivatives of coumarins was evaluated using molecular docking studies. In these studies, it was also observed that the compounds showed better docking scores with respect to the I52 ligand, with the nitro derivatives being the best, due to the ability of the nitro group to better coordinate the Zn++ ion within the binding site. However, the in vitro antiangiogenic activity of sulfonyl derivatives of coumarins was not statistically significant. Only the 2-oxo-2H-chromene-6-sulfonyl derivative with N-acetylpyrazolone substitution at the 6-position showed a promising antiangiogenic activity, exhibiting better binding interactions with the active site and a docking score comparable to that of the inhibitor I52 (−16.22 vs. 18.18 kJmol-1, respectively) [132].
NF-κB is another protein factor, which plays a pivotal role in gene expression and, therefore, is involved in proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis, as well as in drug resistance in cancer. In light of this, the development of angiogenesis inhibitors is of significant importance in the treatment of many cancers. Recently, the effects of 26 new synthetic coumarins were tested against hepatocellular carcinoma cells [133]. The investigators identified (7-carbethoxyamino-2-oxo-2H-chromen-4-yl)-methylpyrrolidine-1-carbodithioate as the most promising one, because it was cytotoxic in a time- and concentration-dependent manner and it was able to hinder the binding of NF-κB to DNA, therefore inhibiting the expression of several genes, such as cyclin D1, Bcl-2, survivin, MMP12, and c-Myc. Furthermore, it was able to reduce cell migration and invasion induced by CXCL12, a cytokine that plays a pivotal role in angiogenesis by recruiting endothelial progenitor cells from the bone marrow [133].
Analysis of data present in the existing literature shows that it is possible to identify, through structure-activity analysis, coumarin derivatives more suitable for a given type of tumor. The coumarin derivatives that possess an N-aryl carboxamide, a phenyl substitution at the C-3 position, and 1, 2, 3-triazolyl, trihydroxystilbene, and amino substitutions at the C-4 position were the most effective in targeting lung cancer [24].
Preliminary in vitro results revealed that some coumarin-tethered isoxazolines exhibited significant antiproliferative effect against a human melanoma cancer cell line (UACC 903). Only one derivative with a 3,4-dimethoxy substitution did not show any cytotoxicity against a normal fibroblast cell line (FF2441) in the same concentration range. These results were corroborated in the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma animal model, highlighting significantly lowered cell viability, body weight, ascites volume as well as a down-regulation of angiogenesis and tumor growth [134].
Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), a key element in the control of cell proliferation and differentiation as well as in angiogenesis, represents an attractive therapeutic target for new inhibitors of angiogenesis. In this regard, the benzamidic derivatives of coumarins were found to be the most promising candidates. Four compounds of N-(4-((2-aminophenyl)carbamoyl) benzyl)-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxamide derivatives showed the most promising cytotoxic effect, calculated as IC50 in the range of 0.53–57.59 μM, on several cancer cells, including HCT116, A2780, MCF7, PC-3, HL60, and A549, without any effects on a human normal cell line (HUVEC, IC50 > 100 μM). Moreover, they showed a strong HDAC1-inhibitory activity (IC50 0.47–0.87 μM) with N-(4-((2-aminophenyl) carbamoyl) benzyl)-7-((3,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxamide, showing an IC50 value similar to that of the reference drug entinostat (0.47 ± 0.02 μM vs. 0.41 ± 0.06 μM) [135].
Another interesting coumarin derivative investigated is (E)-2-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-3-prenyl-4-methoxy-N-hydroxycinamide (BMX), a semisynthetic derivative of osthole and a coumarin found in several plant species, such as Cnidium monnieri L, Angelica archangelica L, and Angelica pubescens Maxim. BMX was found to inhibit VEGF-induced proliferation, migration, and endothelial tube formation in HUVECs. These activities were also corroborated by ex vivo and in vivo studies decreasing VEGF-induced microvessel sprouting from aortic rings and HCT116 colorectal cancer cells. Moreover, BMX inhibited HCT116 cell proliferation and the growth of xenografts of HCT116 cells in vivo [136].
Scopoletin is a well-known natural coumarin with antiangiogenic properties. To develop new and robust angiogenesis inhibitors, several scopoletin derivatives were designed and synthesized. According to the study of Tabana et al. [137], scopoletin inhibited VEGF-A, ERK1, and FGF-2, and is thereby considered a strong antiangiogenic agent. In another study, among several scopoletin analogs, three compounds, including 4-bromo-phenyl and 4-chloro-phenyl scopoletin derivatives and 2-hydroxy-3-(piperidin-1-yl)-propoxy)-6-methoxy-2H-chromen-2-one, were able to inhibit VEGF-stimulated proliferation, migration, and tube formation of HUVECs. These results showed a significant decrease in the VEGF-triggered phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2 and Akt, which was corroborated by in vivo observations on chick chorioallantoic membrane [138]. Luo and co-workers also showed that 3-aryl-4-anilino/aryloxy-2H-chromen-2-one analogues significantly affected breast cancer through the inhibition of estrogen receptor-α and VEGFR-2 [139]. In another study, coumarin-conjugated benzophenone analogs showed promising antitumor activity against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma and Dalton’s lymphoma ascites cell lines. In this study, a compound with a bromo group in the benzophenone structure markedly showed antiangiogenic effects through the inhibition of VEGF [28]. In a more recent study by Makowska et al. [140], a series of 2-imino-2H-chromen-3-yl-1,3,5-triazine compounds were synthesized. Among them, 4-[7-(diethylamino)-2-imino-2H-chromen-3-yl]-6-(4-phenylpiperazin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine showed the greatest cytotoxic effects against several human cancer cell lines, which underscores the promising role of synthetic coumarins in combating cancer. Figure 1 illustrates how coumarins inhibit various angiogenic signaling pathways.

6. Conclusions

Considering the crucial role of angiogenesis in cancer development, antiangiogenic agents have significant potential to fight cancer. Thus, investigating novel drugs to attenuate or prevent angiogenesis-associated complications in cancer is of great importance. The several clinical limitations and side effects related to the administration of current antiangiogenic agents for cancer treatment raise the need to find alternative treatments. Natural and synthetic coumarins have shown a variety of pharmacological properties. They have demonstrated prominent anticancer effects by targeting multiple signaling pathways involved in several types of cancer.
Recently, studies have focused on the antiangiogenic effects of coumarins according to their structure-activity relationships. The present review reports the currently available literature data on the signaling and regulatory pathways of angiogenesis, as well as on antiangiogenic and anticancer mechanisms of natural and synthetic coumarins, critically analyzing and highlighting their use as possible therapeutic strategies. These studies are essential to identify novel and effective anticancer agents with fewer side effects than conventional drugs. It is also critical to identify potential synergies that may allow reducing the side effects of cytotoxic medicines and increasing the quality of life of patients. Additional studies should focus on additional in vitro and in vivo experiments followed by well-controlled clinical trials to reveal the exact signaling pathways involved in cancer angiogenesis as well as the precise pharmacological mechanisms of coumarins. In addition, there is a need to investigate and adjust novel antiangiogenic coumarin lead compounds to develop more potent and efficient anticancer drugs with lower toxicity. In addition, an appropriate drug delivery system should be introduced to overcome the existing pharmacokinetic challenges of coumarin administration. Such research will unveil the potential of coumarins in the prevention, attenuation, and treatment of angiogenesis in cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.M., and M.H.F.; drafting the manuscript, M.B.M., S.F., A.S., D.T., and M.H.F.; review and editing the paper: M.B.M., S.F., E.S.-S., M.H.F., C.R.C., P.B., and A.B.; revising, M.B.M., S.F., M.H.F., and A.B.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yalda Shokoohinia for her excellent and helpful suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carmeliet, P.; Jain, R.K. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature 2000, 407, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ribatti, D.; Puxeddu, I.; Crivellato, E.; Nico, B.; Vacca, A.; Levi-Schaffer, F. Angiogenesis in asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 1815–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rodríguez-Caso, L.; Reyes-Palomares, A.; Sánchez-Jiménez, F.; Quesada, A.R.; Medina, M.Á. What is known on angiogenesis-related rare diseases? A systematic review of literature. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 2872–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ucuzian, A.A.; Gassman, A.A.; East, A.T.; Greisler, H.P. Molecular mediators of angiogenesis. J. Burn. Care. Res. 2010, 31, 158–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Folkman, J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971, 285, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Abd, A.M.; Alamoudi, A.J.; Abdel-Naim, A.B.; Neamatallah, T.A.; Ashour, O.M. Anti-angiogenic agents for the treatment of solid tumors: Potential pathways, therapy and current strategies–a review. J. Adv. Res. 2017, 8, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. EL-Meghawry, E.; Rahman, H.; Abdelkarim, G.; Najda, A. Natural products against cancer angiogenesis. Tumor. Biol. 2016, 37, 14513–14536. [Google Scholar]
  8. Quesada, A.R.; Muñoz-Chápuli, R.; Medina, M.A. Anti-angiogenic drugs: From bench to clinical trials. Med. Res. Rev. 2006, 26, 483–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aviello, G.; Romano, B.; Borrelli, F.; Capasso, R.; Gallo, L.; Piscitelli, F.; Di Marzo, V.; Izzo, A.A. Chemopreventive effect of the non-psychotropic phytocannabinoid cannabidiol on experimental colon cancer. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 90, 925–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Z.; Dabrosin, C.; Yin, X.; Fuster, M.M.; Arreola, A.; Rathmell, W.K.; Generali, D.; Nagaraju, G.P.; El-Rayes, B.; Ribatti, D.; et al. Broad targeting of angiogenesis for cancer prevention and therapy. Sem. Can. Biol. 2015, 35, S224–S243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bishayee, A.; Darvesh, A.S. Angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma: A potential target for chemoprevention and therapy. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2012, 12, 1095–1118. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rajasekar, J.; Perumal, M.K.; Vallikannan, B. A critical review on anti-angiogenic property of phytochemicals. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019, 71, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fakhri, s.; Abbaszadeh, F.; Jorjani, M.; Pourgholami, M.H. The effects of anticancer medicinal herbs on vascular endothelial growth factor based on pharmacological aspects: A review study. Nutr. Cancer 2019, 25, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pagano, E.; Borrelli, F.; Orlando, P.; Romano, B.; Monti, M.; Morbidelli, L.; Aviello, G.; Imperatore, R.; Capasso, R.; Piscitelli, F. Pharmacological inhibition of MAGL attenuates experimental colon carcinogenesis. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 119, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, S.; Kumari, R.; Mishra, S. Pharmacological properties and their medicinal uses of Cinnamomum: A review. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 71, 1735–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ribeiro, C.V.C.; Kaplan, M.A.C. Tendências evolutivas de famílias produtoras de cumarinas em Angiospermae. Química Nova 2002, 25, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Borges Bubols, G.; da Rocha Vianna, D.; Medina-Remon, A.; von Poser, G.; Maria Lamuela-Raventos, R.; Lucia Eifler-Lima, V.; Cristina Garcia, S. The antioxidant activity of coumarins and flavonoids. Mini. Rev. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 318–334. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gagliotti Vigil de Mello, S.V.; Frode, T.S. In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Model-based Approaches for Investigating Anti-inflammatory Properties of Coumarins. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 1446–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Orhan, I.E. Potential of Natural Products of Herbal Origin as Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghate, M.; Kusanur, R.A.; Kulkarni, M.V. Synthesis and in vivo analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of some bi heterocyclic coumarin derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 40, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jameel, E.; Umar, T.; Kumar, J.; Hoda, N. Coumarin: A privileged scaffold for the design and development of antineurodegenerative agents. Chem. Biol. Drug. Des. 2016, 87, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Najmanova, I.; Dosedel, M.; Hrdina, R.; Anzenbacher, P.; Filipsky, T.; Riha, M.; Mladenka, P. Cardiovascular effects of coumarins besides their antioxidant activity. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 830–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, H.; Yao, Y.; Li, L. Coumarins as potential antidiabetic agents. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017, 69, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kumar, M.; Singla, R.; Dandriyal, J.; Jaitak, V. Coumarin derivatives as anticancer agents for lung cancer therapy: A review. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 964–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ren, Q.-C.; Gao, C.; Xu, Z.; Feng, L.-S.; Liu, M.-L.; Wu, X.; Zhao, F. Bis-coumarin derivatives and their biological activities. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pereira, T.M.; Franco, D.P.; Vitorio, F.; Kummerle, A.E. Coumarin Compounds in Medicinal Chemistry: Some Important Examples from the Last Years. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 124–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaur, M.; Kohli, S.; Sandhu, S.; Bansal, Y.; Bansal, G. Coumarin: A promising scaffold for anticancer agents. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 1032–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vijay Avin, B.R.; Thirusangu, P.; Lakshmi Ranganatha, V.; Firdouse, A.; Prabhakar, B.T.; Khanum, S.A. Synthesis and tumor inhibitory activity of novel coumarin analogs targeting angiogenesis and apoptosis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 75, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thakur, A.; Singla, R.; Jaitak, V. Coumarins as anticancer agents: A review on synthetic strategies, mechanism of action and SAR studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 101, 476–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pan, R.; Gao, X.; Lu, D.; Xu, X.; Xia, Y.; Dai, Y. Prevention of FGF-2-induced angiogenesis by scopoletin, a coumarin compound isolated from Erycibe obtusifolia Benth, and its mechanism of action. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011, 11, 2007–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Park, S.L.; Won, S.Y.; Song, J.-H.; Lee, S.-Y.; Kim, W.-J.; Moon, S.-K. Esculetin inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2016, 44, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Amini, A.; Masoumi, M.S.; Morris, L.D.; Pourgholami, H.M. The critical role of vascular endothelial growth factor in tumor angiogenesis. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2012, 12, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Simons, M.; Gordon, E.; Claesson-Welsh, L. Mechanisms and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bergers, G.; Benjamin, L.E. Angiogenesis: Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat. Rev. Can. 2003, 3, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El-Kenawi, A.E.; El-Remessy, A.B. Angiogenesis inhibitors in cancer therapy: Mechanistic perspective on classification and treatment rationales. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 170, 712–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pourgholami, M.H.; Khachigian, L.M.; Fahmy, R.G.; Badar, S.; Wang, L.; Chu, S.W.L.; Morris, D.L. Albendazole inhibits endothelial cell migration, tube formation, vasopermeability, VEGF receptor-2 expression and suppresses retinal neovascularization in ROP model of angiogenesis. Bioch. Bioph. Res. Commun. 2010, 397, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Folkman, J. Angiogenesis and Apoptosis, Seminars in cancer biology, Semin. Cancer Biol. 2003, 13, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Folkman, J. Opinion: Angiogenesis: An organizing principle for drug discovery? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mundel, T.M.; Kalluri, R. Type IV collagen-derived angiogenesis inhibitors. Microvasc. Res. 2007, 74, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ribatti, D. Endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis: A historical review. Leuk. Res. 2009, 33, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rajabi, M.; Mousa, S. The role of angiogenesis in cancer treatment. Biomedicines 2017, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Kerbel, R.S. Tumor angiogenesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 2039–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Pugh, C.W.; Ratcliffe, P.J. Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia: Role of the HIF system. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ohlfest, J.R.; Demorest, Z.L.; Motooka, Y.; Vengco, I.; Oh, S.; Chen, E.; Scappaticci, F.A.; Saplis, R.J.; Ekker, S.C.; Low, W.C. Combinatorial antiangiogenic gene therapy by nonviral gene transfer using the sleeping beauty transposon causes tumor regression and improves survival in mice bearing intracranial human glioblastoma. Mol. Ther. 2005, 12, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abdalla, A.M.; Xiao, L.; Ullah, M.W.; Yu, M.; Ouyang, C.; Yang, G. Current challenges of cancer anti-angiogenic therapy and the promise of nanotherapeutics. Theranostics 2018, 8, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marimpietri, D.; Brignole, C.; Nico, B.; Pastorino, F.; Pezzolo, A.; Piccardi, F.; Cilli, M.; Di Paolo, D.; Pagnan, G.; Longo, L. Combined therapeutic effects of vinblastine and rapamycin on human neuroblastoma growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Clin. Can. Res. 2007, 13, 3977–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, W.; Tang, Y.-X.; Wan, L.; Cai, J.-H.; Zhang, J. Effects of combining Taxol and cyclooxygenase inhibitors on the angiogenesis and apoptosis in human ovarian cancer xenografts. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 5, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Nakashio, A.; Fujita, N.; Tsuruo, T. Topotecan inhibits VEGF-and bFGF-induced vascular endothelial cell migration via downregulation of the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Int. J. Cancer 2002, 98, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sang, C.-Y.; Xu, X.-H.; Qin, W.-W.; Liu, J.-F.; Hui, L.; Chen, S.-W. DPMA, a deoxypodophyllotoxin derivative, induces apoptosis and anti-angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 6650–6655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xiu-jin, Y.; Mao-fang, L. Homoharringtonine induces apoptosis of endothelium and down-regulates VEGF expression of K562 cells. J. Zhejiang. Univ. Sci. A 2004, 5, 230–234. [Google Scholar]
  51. Graveel, C.R.; Tolbert, D.; Woude, G.F.V. MET: A critical player in tumorigenesis and therapeutic target. Cold. Spring. Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a009209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. You, W.-K.; McDonald, D.M. The hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met signaling pathway as a therapeutic target to inhibit angiogenesis. BMB. Rep. 2008, 41, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Beenken, A.; Mohammadi, M. The FGF family: Biology, pathophysiology and therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Turner, N.; Pearson, A.; Sharpe, R.; Lambros, M.; Geyer, F.; Lopez-Garcia, M.A.; Natrajan, R.; Marchio, C.; Iorns, E.; Mackay, A. FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 2085–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lu, K.V.; Chang, J.P.; Parachoniak, C.A.; Pandika, M.M.; Aghi, M.K.; Meyronet, D.; Isachenko, N.; Fouse, S.D.; Phillips, J.J.; Cheresh, D.A. VEGF inhibits tumor cell invasion and mesenchymal transition through a MET/VEGFR2 complex. Cancer Cell 2012, 22, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Jahangiri, A.; De Lay, M.; Miller, L.M.; Carbonell, W.S.; Hu, Y.-L.; Lu, K.; Tom, M.W.; Paquette, J.; Tokuyasu, T.A.; Tsao, S. Gene expression profile identifies tyrosine kinase c-Met as a targetable mediator of antiangiogenic therapy resistance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 1773–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Cao, Y.; Cao, R.; Hedlund, E.-M. R Regulation of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis by FGF and PDGF signaling pathways. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 86, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Heldin, C.-H. Targeting the PDGF signaling pathway in tumor treatment. Cell Commun. Signal. 2013, 11, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wu, E.; Palmer, N.; Tian, Z.; Moseman, A.P.; Galdzicki, M.; Wang, X.; Berger, B.; Zhang, H.; Kohane, I.S. Comprehensive dissection of PDGF-PDGFR signaling pathways in PDGFR genetically defined cells. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cao, Y. Multifarious functions of PDGFs and PDGFRs in tumor growth and metastasis. Trend. Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 460–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Levitzki, A. PDGF receptor kinase inhibitors for the treatment of PDGF driven diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004, 15, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lu, C.; Shahzad, M.M.; Moreno-Smith, M.; Lin, Y.; Jennings, N.B.; Allen, J.K.; Landen, C.N.; Mangala, L.S.; Armaiz-Pena, G.N.; Schmandt, R. Targeting pericytes with a PDGF-B aptamer in human ovarian carcinoma models. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 9, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Zhao, Y.; Adjei, A.A. Targeting angiogenesis in cancer therapy: Moving beyond vascular endothelial growth factor. Oncologist 2015, 20, 660–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Cascone, T.; Heymach, J.V. Targeting the angiopoietin/Tie2 pathway: Cutting tumor vessels with a double-edged sword? J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 30, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gerald, D.; Chintharlapalli, S.; Augustin, H.G.; Benjamin, L.E. Angiopoietin-2: An attractive target for improved antiangiogenic tumor therapy. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 1649–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mulligan, L.M. RET revisited: Expanding the oncogenic portfolio. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ibáñez, C.F. Structure and physiology of the RET receptor tyrosine kinase. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a009134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Hernández-Carlos, B.; Villanueva-Cañongo, C. Shikimic Acid Pathway in Biosynthesis of Phenolic Compounds. In Plant Physiological Aspects of Phenolic Compounds; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  69. Jain, P.; Joshi, H. Coumarin: Chemical and pharmacological profile. JAPS 2012, 2, 236–240. [Google Scholar]
  70. Stefanachi, A.; Leonetti, F.; Pisani, L.; Catto, M.; Carotti, A. Coumarin: A natural, privileged and versatile scaffold for bioactive compounds. Molecules 2018, 23, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Venugopala, K.N.; Rashmi, V.; Odhav, B. Review on natural coumarin lead compounds for their pharmacological activity. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 963248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hroboňová, K.; Machyňáková, A.; Čižmárik, J. Determination of dicoumarol in Melilotus officinalis L. by using molecularly imprinted polymer solid-phase extraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1539, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kassim, N.K.; Rahmani, M.; Ismail, A.; Sukari, M.A.; Ee, G.C.L.; Nasir, N.M.; Awang, K. Antioxidant activity-guided separation of coumarins and lignan from Melicope glabra (Rutaceae). Food Chem. 2013, 139, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pfeifer, I.; Murauer, A.; Ganzera, M. Determination of coumarins in the roots of Angelica dahurica by supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 129, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Teixeira, D.M.; Patão, R.F.; Coelho, A.V.; da Costa, C.T. Comparison between sample disruption methods and solid–liquid extraction (SLE) to extract phenolic compounds from Ficus carica leaves. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1103, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Walasek, M.; Grzegorczyk, A.; Malm, A.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K. Bioactivity-guided isolation of antimicrobial coumarins from Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier (Apiaceae) fruits by high-performance counter-current chromatography. Food Chem. 2015, 186, 133–138. [Google Scholar]
  77. Widelski, J.; Luca, S.V.; Skiba, A.; Chinou, I.; Marcourt, L.; Wolfender, J.-L.; Skalicka-Wozniak, K. Isolation and Antimicrobial Activity of Coumarin Derivatives from Fruits of Peucedanum luxurians Tamamsch. Molecules 2018, 23, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Shokoohinia, Y.; Sajjadi, S.-E.; Gholamzadeh, S.; Fattahi, A.; Behbahani, M. Antiviral and cytotoxic evaluation of coumarins from Prangos ferulacea. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 52, 1543–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Monsef-Esfahani, H.R.; Amini, M.; Goodarzi, N.; Saiedmohammadi, F.; Hajiaghaee, R.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Tofighi, Z.; Ghahremani, M.H. Coumarin compounds of Biebersteinia multifida roots show potential anxiolytic effects in mice. DARU 2013, 21, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Karakaya, S.; Koca, M.; Yılmaz, S.V.; Yıldırım, K.; Pınar, N.M.; Demirci, B.; Brestic, M.; Sytar, O. Molecular docking studies of coumarins isolated from extracts and essential oils of Zosima absinthifolia Link as potential inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Molecules 2019, 24, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kontogiorgis, C.A.; Savvoglou, K.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.J. Antiinflammatory and antioxidant evaluation of novel coumarin derivatives. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2006, 21, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Alipour, M.; Khoobi, M.; Emami, S.; Fallah-Benakohal, S.; Ghasemi-Niri, S.F.; Abdollahi, M.; Foroumadi, A.; Shafiee, A. Antinociceptive properties of new coumarin derivatives bearing substituted 3, 4-dihydro-2 H-benzothiazines. DARU 2014, 22, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Bighetti, A.; Antonio, M.; Kohn, L.; Rehder, V.; Foglio, M.; Possenti, A.; Vilela, L.; Carvalho, J. Antiulcerogenic activity of a crude hydroalcoholic extract and coumarin isolated from Mikania laevigata Schultz Bip. Phytomedicine 2005, 12, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sadraei, H.; Shokoohinia, Y.; Sajjadi, S.; Ghadirian, B. Antispasmodic effect of osthole and Prangos ferulacea extract on rat uterus smooth muscle motility. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 7, 141. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Chen, I.-S.; Chang, C.-T.; Sheen, W.-S.; Teng, C.-M.; Tsai, I.-L.; Duh, C.-Y.; Ko, F.-N. Coumarins and antiplatelet aggregation constituents from Formosan Peucedanum japonicum. Phytochemistry 1996, 41, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dongmo, A.; Azebaze, A.; Nguelefack, T.; Ouahouo, B.; Sontia, B.; Meyer, M.; Nkengfack, A.; Kamanyi, A.; Vierling, W. Vasodilator effect of the extracts and some coumarins from the stem bark of Mammea africana (Guttiferae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sakunpak, A.; Matsunami, K.; Otsuka, H.; Panichayupakaranant, P. Isolation of new monoterpene coumarins from Micromelum minutum leaves and their cytotoxic activity against Leishmania major and cancer cells. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lake, B.G.; Grasso, P. Comparison of the hepatotoxicity of coumarin in the rat, mouse, and Syrian hamster: A dose and time response study. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1996, 34, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Musa, M.A.; Cooperwood, J.S.; Khan, M.O.F. A review of coumarin derivatives in pharmacotherapy of breast cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 2664–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Amaral, R.; dos Santos, S.; Andrade, L.; Severino, P.; Carvalho, A. Natural Products as Treatment against Cancer: A Historical and Current Vision. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 4, 1562. [Google Scholar]
  91. Devji, T.; Reddy, C.; Woo, C.; Awale, S.; Kadota, S.; Carrico-Moniz, D. Pancreatic anticancer activity of a novel geranylgeranylated coumarin derivative. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 5770–5773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Foroozesh, M.; Sridhar, J.; Goyal, N.; Liu, J. Coumarins and P450s, Studies Reported to-Date. Molecules 2019, 24, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Saidu, N.E.B.; Valente, S.; Bana, E.; Kirsch, G.; Bagrel, D.; Montenarh, M. Coumarin polysulfides inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in HCT116 colon cancer cells. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 1584–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Nordin, N.; Fadaeinasab, M.; Mohan, S.; Hashim, N.M.; Othman, R.; Karimian, H.; Iman, V.; Ramli, N.; Ali, H.M.; Majid, N.A. Pulchrin A, a new natural coumarin derivative of Enicosanthellum pulchrum, induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells via intrinsic pathway. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wang, J.; Lu, M.; Dai, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Wei, N. Esculetin, a coumarin derivative, exerts in vitro and in vivo antiproliferative activity against hepatocellular carcinoma by initiating a mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis pathway. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2015, 48, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Haghighitalab, A.; Matin, M.M.; Bahrami, A.R.; Iranshahi, M.; Saeinasab, M.; Haghighi, F. In vitro investigation of anticancer, cell-cycle-inhibitory, and apoptosis-inducing effects of diversin, a natural prenylated coumarin, on bladder carcinoma cells. Z. Nat. C J. Biosci. 2014, 69, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hejchman, E.; Taciak, P.; Kowalski, S.; Maciejewska, D.; Czajkowska, A.; Borowska, J.; Śladowski, D.; Młynarczuk-Biały, I. Synthesis and anticancer activity of 7-hydroxycoumarinyl gallates. Pharm. Rep. 2015, 67, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zahri, S.; Razavi, S.M.; Moatamed, Z. Antioxidant activity and cytotoxic effect of aviprin and aviprin-3″-O-d-glucopyranoside on LNCaP and HeLa cell lines. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chuang, J.-Y.; Huang, Y.-F.; Lu, H.-F.; Ho, H.-C.; Yang, J.-S.; Li, T.-M.; Chang, N.-W.; Chung, J.-G. Coumarin induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human cervical cancer HeLa cells through a mitochondria-and caspase-3 dependent mechanism and NF-κB down-regulation. In Vivo 2007, 21, 1003–1009. [Google Scholar]
  101. Aas, Z.; Babaei, E.; Feizi, M.A.H.; Dehghan, G. Anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of dendrosomal farnesiferol C on gastric cancer cells. Asian. Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 5325–5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Lv, N.; Sun, M.; Liu, C.; Li, J. Design and synthesis of 2-phenylpyrimidine coumarin derivatives as anticancer agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 4578–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Maresca, A.; Temperini, C.; Pochet, L.; Masereel, B.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C.T. Deciphering the mechanism of carbonic anhydrase inhibition with coumarins and thiocoumarins. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 53, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Mokdad-Bzeouich, I.; Kovacic, H.; Ghedira, K.; Chebil, L.; Ghoul, M.; Chekir-Ghedira, L.; Luis, J. Esculin and its oligomer fractions inhibit adhesion and migration of U87 glioblastoma cells and in vitro angiogenesis. Tumor. Biol. 2016, 37, 3657–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Taniguchi, K.; Funasaki, M.; Kishida, A.; Sadhu, S.K.; Ahmed, F.; Ishibashi, M.; Ohsaki, A. Two new coumarins and a new xanthone from the leaves of Rhizophora mucronata. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mojarrab, M.; Emami, S.A.; Delazar, A.; Tayarani-Najaran, Z. Cytotoxic Properties of Three Isolated Coumarin-hemiterpene Ether Derivatives from Artemisia armeniaca Lam. IJPR 2017, 16, 221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  107. Jantamat, P.; Weerapreeyakul, N.; Puthongking, P. Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis Induction of Coumarins and Carbazole Alkaloids from Clausena Harmandiana. Molecules 2019, 24, 3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Liu, W.; Hua, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, H.; Cheng, Y.; Gust, R. Synthesis and in vitro antitumor activity of novel scopoletin derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 5008–5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, Y.; Lv, Z.; Zhong, H.; Geng, D.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Li, Y.; Li, K. Convenient synthesis of novel geiparvarin analogs with potential anti-cancer activity via click chemistry. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 53, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cui, N.; Lin, D.-D.; Shen, Y.; Shi, J.-G.; Wang, B.; Zhao, M.-Z.; Zheng, L.; Chen, H.; Shi, J.-H. Triphenylethylene-Coumarin Hybrid TCH-5c Suppresses Tumorigenic Progression in Breast Cancer Mainly Through the Inhibition of Angiogenesis. Anti-Cancer Agents. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nishida, N.; Yano, H.; Nishida, T.; Kamura, T.; Kojiro, M. Angiogenesis in cancer. Vasc. Health. Risk Manag. 2006, 2, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sandhiutami, N.M.D.; Moordiani, M.; Laksmitawati, D.R.; Fauziah, N.; Maesaroh, M.; Widowati, W. In vitro assesment of anti-inflammatory activities of coumarin and Indonesian cassia extract in RAW264.7 murine macrophage cell line. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2017, 20, 99. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Pan, R.; Dai, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Yao, X.; Xia, Y. Anti-angiogenic potential of scopoletin is associated with the inhibition of ERK1/2 activation. Drug. Dev. Res. 2009, 70, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pan, R.; Gao, X.H.; Li, Y.; Xia, Y.F.; Dai, Y. Anti-arthritic effect of scopoletin, a coumarin compound occurring in Erycibe obtusifolia Benth stems, is associated with decreased angiogenesis in synovium. Fundam. Clin. Pharm. 2010, 24, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Anegundi, N.; Pancharatna, K. 7-Hydroxycoumarin Elicit Anti-Angiogenic Effects Through Cellular Apoptosis in Developing Embryos of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). Eur. Sci. J. 2017, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jung, M.H.; Lee, S.H.; Ahn, E.-M.; Lee, Y.M. Decursin and decursinol angelate inhibit VEGF-induced angiogenesis via suppression of the VEGFR-2-signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Wang, K.S.; Lv, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; Mi, C.; Li, X.; Xu, G.H.; Piao, L.X.; Zheng, S.Z.; Jin, X. Imperatorin efficiently blocks TNF-α-mediated activation of ROS/PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 37, 3397–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bronikowska, J.; Szliszka, E.; Jaworska, D.; Czuba, Z.P.; Krol, W. The coumarin psoralidin enhances anticancer effect of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Molecules 2012, 17, 6449–6464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Pan, R.; Dai, Y.; Gao, X.-H.; Lu, D.; Xia, Y.-F. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis by scopoletin through interrupting the autophosphorylation of VEGF receptor 2 and its downstream signaling pathways. Vascul. Pharm. 2011, 54, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Jiang, C.; Xing, C.; Kim, S.-H.; Lu, J. Anti-cancer and other bioactivities of Korean Angelica gigas Nakai (AGN) and its major pyranocoumarin compounds. Anticancer. Agents. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 1239–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.K.; Ahn, E.K.; Ko, H.J.; Cho, Y.R.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Bae, G.U.; Oh, J.S.; Seo, D.W. Marmesin is a novel angiogenesis inhibitor: Regulatory effect and molecular mechanism on endothelial cell fate and angiogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2015, 369, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yang, Y.; Zhu, R.; Li, J.; Yang, X.; He, J.; Wang, H.; Chang, Y. Separation and Enrichment of Three Coumarins from Angelicae Pubescentis Radix by Macroporous Resin with Preparative HPLC and Evaluation of Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Cheraghi, O.; Dehghan, G.; Mahdavi, M.; Rahbarghazi, R.; Rezabakhsh, A.; Charoudeh, H.N.; Iranshahi, M.; Montazersaheb, S. Potent anti-angiogenic and cytotoxic effect of conferone on human colorectal adenocarcinoma HT-29 cells. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kumar, A.; Sunita, P.; Jha, S.; Pattanayak, S.P. Daphnetin inhibits TNF-α and VEGF-induced angiogenesis through inhibition of the IKK s/IκBα/NF-κB, Src/FAK/ERK 1/2 and Akt signalling pathways. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 2016, 43, 939–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Long, W.; Wang, M.; Luo, X.; Huang, G.; Chen, J. Murrangatin suppresses angiogenesis induced by tumor cell-derived media and inhibits AKT activation in zebrafish and endothelial cells. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2018, 12, 3107–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Kim, K.H.; Lee, H.J.; Jeong, S.J.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, E.O.; Kim, H.S.; Zhang, Y.; Ryu, S.Y.; Lee, M.H.; Lü, J.; et al. Galbanic acid isolated from Ferula assafoetida exerts in vivo anti-tumor activity in association with anti-angiogenesis and anti-proliferation. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Alizadeh, M.N.; Rashidi, M.; Muhammadnejad, A.; Zanjani, T.M.; Ziai, S.A. Antitumor effects of umbelliprenin in a mouse model of colorectal cancer. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2018, 17, 976–985. [Google Scholar]
  128. Jamialahmadi, K.; Salari, S.; Alamolhodaei, N.S.; Avan, A.; Gholami, L.; Karimi, G. Auraptene Inhibits Migration and Invasion of Cervical and Ovarian Cancer Cells by Repression of Matrix Metalloproteinasas 2 and 9 Activity. J. Pharm. 2018, 21, 177. [Google Scholar]
  129. Yao, F.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, G.; Liu, M.; Liang, G.; Yuan, Q. Osthole attenuates angiogenesis in an orthotopic mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma via the downregulation of nuclear factor-κB and vascular endothelial growth factor. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 4471–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Pan, R.; Dai, Y.; Gao, X.; Xia, Y. Scopolin isolated from Erycibe obtusifolia Benth stems suppresses adjuvant-induced rat arthritis by inhibiting inflammation and angiogenesis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lee, S.; Sivakumar, K.; Shin, W.-S.; Xie, F.; Wang, Q. Synthesis and anti-angiogenesis activity of coumarin derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4596–4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. El-Sawy, E.R.; Ebaid, M.S.; Rady, H.M.; Shalby, A.B.; Ahmed, K.M.; Abo-Salem, H.M. Synthesis and molecular docking of novel non-cytotoxic anti-angiogenic sulfonyl coumarin derivatives against hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. J. App. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 7, 049–066. [Google Scholar]
  133. Neelgundmath, M.; Dinesh, K.R.; Mohan, C.D.; Li, F.; Dai, X.; Siveen, K.S.; Paricharak, S.; Mason, D.J.; Fuchs, J.E.; Sethi, G. Novel synthetic coumarins that targets NF-κB in hepatocellular carcinoma. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Lingaraju, G.S.; Balaji, K.S.; Jayarama, S.; Anil, S.M.; Kiran, K.R.; Sadashiva, M.P. Synthesis of new coumarin tethered isoxazolines as potential anticancer agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 3606–3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Abdizadeh, T.; Kalani, M.R.; Abnous, K.; Tayarani-Najaran, Z.; Khashyarmanesh, B.Z.; Abdizadeh, R.; Ghodsi, R.; Hadizadeh, F. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel coumarin-based benzamides as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors and anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 132, 42–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yang, H.Y.; Hsu, Y.F.; Chiu, P.T.; Ho, S.J.; Wang, C.H.; Chi, C.C.; Huang, Y.H.; Lee, C.F.; Li, Y.S.; Ou, G.; et al. Anti-Cancer Activity of an Osthole Derivative, NBM-T-BMX-OS01: Targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Signaling and Angiogenesis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Tabana, Y.M.; Hassan, L.E.A.; Ahamed, M.B.K.; Dahham, S.S.; Iqbal, M.A.; Saeed, M.A.; Khan, M.S.S.; Sandai, D.; Majid, A.S.A.; Oon, C.E. Scopoletin, an active principle of tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca) inhibits human tumor vascularization in xenograft models and modulates ERK1, VEGF-A, and FGF-2 in computer model. Microvasc. Res. 2016, 107, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Cai, X.; Yang, J.; Zhou, J.; Lu, W.; Hu, C.; Gu, Z.; Huo, J.; Wang, X.; Cao, P. Synthesis and biological evaluation of scopoletin derivatives. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Luo, G.; Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Wu, C.; Tang, Z.; Liu, L.; You, Q.; Xiang, H. Novel SERMs based on 3-aryl-4-aryloxy-2H-chromen-2-one skeleton-A possible way to dual ERα/VEGFR-2 ligands for treatment of breast cancer. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 140, 252–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Makowska, A.; Sączewski, F.; Bednarski, P.; Sączewski, J.; Balewski, Ł. Hybrid Molecules Composed of 2, 4-Diamino-1, 3, 5-triazines and 2-Imino-Coumarins and Coumarins. Synthesis and Cytotoxic Properties. Molecules 2018, 23, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 24 04278 g001 550
Figure 1. Signaling pathways and therapeutic targets of antiangiogenic and anticancer drugs and agents. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PGF, placental growth factor; HGF/SF, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; CSF-1, colony-stimulating factor-1; IL, interleukin; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; TIMPs, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; S1PR, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor; NO, nitric oxide; PI3K:,phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PLC, phospholipase C; PKC, protein kinase C; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; and m-TOR: mammalian target of rapamycin.
Figure 1. Signaling pathways and therapeutic targets of antiangiogenic and anticancer drugs and agents. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PGF, placental growth factor; HGF/SF, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; CSF-1, colony-stimulating factor-1; IL, interleukin; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; TIMPs, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; S1PR, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor; NO, nitric oxide; PI3K:,phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PLC, phospholipase C; PKC, protein kinase C; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; and m-TOR: mammalian target of rapamycin.
Molecules 24 04278 g001
Molecules 24 04278 g002a 550Molecules 24 04278 g002b 550
Figure 2. Chemical structures of coumarins with antiangiogenic effects.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of coumarins with antiangiogenic effects.
Molecules 24 04278 g002aMolecules 24 04278 g002b
Table
Table 1. Natural coumarins with antiangiogenic effects and their mechanisms.
Table 1. Natural coumarins with antiangiogenic effects and their mechanisms.
CoumarinSourcesMechanism of ActionConcentrationsReference
Galbanic acidFerula assafoetidaDecreases molecular angiogenesis pathways including VEGF, MAPK, JNK, and AKT5, 10, 20, 40 µM for in vitro study and 0.1, 1 mg/Kg for Lewis lung cancer (LLC) mouse model, intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected once daily for 18 days[126]
UmbellipreninFerula speciesReduces and blocks angiogenesis marker activity including Ki-67, CD31, VEGF, MMP2, MMP9, and E-cadherin3, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µg/mL[127]
MurrangatinMicromelum falcatumInhibition of phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT activity as angiogenic inducer 10, 50, 100 µM[125]
ImperatorinAngelica dahurica and Angelica archangelicaBlocks the expression of nuclear factor (NF-κB) target genes, such as MMP-9, VEGF, IL-6 that are induced by TNF-α50, 100, 150 µM[117]
AurapteneCitrus sinensisInhibition of angiogenesis via suppression of MMP-2,912.5, 25, 50, 100 µM[128]
EsculetinArtemisia scopariaInhibition of angiogenesis via decreasing MMP expression and blocking phosphorylation of VEGFR-2, ERK1/2, Akt, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) induced by VEGF (20 ng/mL)12.5, 25, 50 µg/ml[31]
OstholCnidium monnieriReduction of microvessel density (MVD) with blocked expression of VEGF and NF-κB61, 122, and 244 mg/kg, i.p, once daily for two weeks in a mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[129]
ConferoneFerula szwitsianaReduction of the production of the pro-angiogenic factors VEGF, Angiopoietin-1, and Angiopoietin -220 µM[123]
DaphnetinChangbai daphneInhibition of the expression of proteins involved in angiogenesis induced by VEGF such as MAPK, VEGFR2, ERK1/2, AKT, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), cSrc, and MMP and inhibition of NF-κB induced by TNF-α37.5, 75, 150 µM[124]
ScopolinErycibe obtusifolia BenthDecreases VEGF, FGF-2 and IL-6 expressions25, 50, 100 mg/kg, i.p, once daily for 10 days[130]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Majnooni, M.B.; Fakhri, S.; Smeriglio, A.; Trombetta, D.; Croley, C.R.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Farzaei, M.H.; Bishayee, A. Antiangiogenic Effects of Coumarins against Cancer: From Chemistry to Medicine. Molecules 2019, 24, 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234278

AMA Style

Majnooni MB, Fakhri S, Smeriglio A, Trombetta D, Croley CR, Bhattacharyya P, Sobarzo-Sánchez E, Farzaei MH, Bishayee A. Antiangiogenic Effects of Coumarins against Cancer: From Chemistry to Medicine. Molecules. 2019; 24(23):4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Majnooni, Mohammad Bagher, Sajad Fakhri, Antonella Smeriglio, Domenico Trombetta, Courtney R. Croley, Piyali Bhattacharyya, Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez, Mohammad Hosein Farzaei, and Anupam Bishayee. 2019. "Antiangiogenic Effects of Coumarins against Cancer: From Chemistry to Medicine" Molecules 24, no. 23: 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234278

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop