Next Article in Journal
Intramolecular and Metal-to-Molecule Charge Transfer Electronic Resonances in the Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of 1,4-Bis((E)-2-(pyridin-4-yl)vinyl)naphthalene
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrasound-Assisted Solvent Extraction of a Porous Membrane Packed Sample for the Determination of Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines in the Replacement Liquids for E-Cigarettes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving the Yields and Reaction Rate in the Ethanolysis of Soybean Oil by Using Mixtures of Lipase CLEAs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for Special Issue: Enzyme Immobilization and Its Applications

by
Roberto Fernandez-Lafuente
Institute of Catalysis and Petrochemistry-CSIC, Campus UAM-CSIC, C/ Marie Curie 2, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Molecules 2019, 24(24), 4619; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244619
Submission received: 11 December 2019 / Accepted: 13 December 2019 / Published: 17 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enzyme Immobilization and Its Applications)
Modern chemistry demands cleaner processes, for which more efficient catalysts are required [1,2]. Enzymatic biocatalysis is among the best solutions for this demand of the society [2]. However, enzymes did not fulfil the requirements of industry, and in many instances they need to be improved. While enzyme immobilization was started just to solve the problem of enzyme recovery due to the high price of enzymes, nowadays it has become a system that may permit improvement of many enzyme features, like stability, activity, selectivity, specificity, and even purity [3,4,5,6,7]. The immobilization only will provide full advantages if analyzed in a global way, including the support and the immobilization protocol (including the active groups in the support, the immobilization conditions, and the design of a final end process) [8]. In this way, a proper enzyme immobilization remains a critical step in the industrial design of an enzymatic biocatalyst.
Enzyme immobilization is the main topic of this third Special Issue in Molecules. The previous issues gathered 45 [9] and 23 published papers [10]; in this issue, 17 new papers have been collected. The decrease in the number of papers is more related to the many Special Issues on enzyme immobilization than to a real lack of interest of the researchers in this topic [11].
The Special Issue shows a review on the characterization of the microenvironment of immobilized enzymes, a complex and critical point in understanding the immobilized enzymes [12]. Another contribution shows that the characterization of the stability of an immobilized enzyme may be better using mass of product rather than time to become inactivated [13]. This means that a proper characterization of the immobilization parameters is required [14].
In this new Special Issue, enzyme co-immobilization has become an important topic. There are a great amount of publications regarding this topic, as it presents many kinetic advantages [15,16,17,18]; however, the disadvantages tend to be ignored [6,19,20,21,22]. In this manner, horseradish peroxidase, galactose oxidase and catalase have been co-immobilized into Cu3(PO4)2 nanoflowers to transform hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-diformylfuran, avoiding the enzyme inactivation by the hydrogen peroxide produced by the oxidase and giving better yields than using individually immobilized enzymes [23]. Another paper shows the co-immobilization of a α-amylase (dextrozyme) and a protease (esperase), adding a β-galactosidase in some instances [24]. However, co-immobilization is not always an advantage. For example, the production of biodiesel was improved by using lipases from porcine pancreas and from Thermomyces lanuginosus that were immobilized using the crosslinked enzyme aggregate CLEA technology, but the differences in enzyme stabilities makes it inconvenient to co-immobilize both enzymes [25]. As one of the CLEAs was magnetic, they could be separated when the least stable enzyme was inactivated [25]. CLEA technology is very popular. The apparent simplicity of CLEA preparation has converted it in a widely attractive method [3,6,26].
Lipase immobilization has been a main trend in this issue. CLEA technology has been utilized to produce magnetic biocatalysts in two further contributions. In one of the examples, lipase B from Candida antarctica was utilized to produce magnetic CLEAs (using magnetic nanoparticles modified with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane) and the biocatalyst was utilized in the resolution of racemic 1-phenylethanol [27]. In the other, porcine pancreas lipase was immobilized following this technique, trying to increase the activity by tailoring the porosity of the biocatalysts using different strategies (use of polyethyleneimine or dodecyl aldehyde, co-aggregation with bovine serum albumin and/or soy protein or the addition of starch) [28].
Immobilization of lipases on hydrophobic supports is one the most used strategies to immobilize these enzymes, due to the many advantages of the process [29]. For example, lipase MAS1 was immobilized on XAD1180 resin (a hydrophobic support) and utilized to modify phosphatidylcholine with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids or rich ethyl esters in a solvent-free system [30]. In another research effort, the lipase from Pseudomonas stutzeri was immobilized on octyl silica and utilized to produce ascorbyl palmitate [31]. Lipase from Candida rugosa was immobilized into modified hollow mesoporous silica coated with different hydrophobic materials, with the best results being obtained using octadecyl [32]. The biocatalyst was used in the esterification of phytosterols with polyunsaturated fatty acid in a solvent-free system [32]. Lipases from Beauveria bassiana and Fusarium oxysporum were immobilized on octyl-sepharose and used to produce omega-6 and -9 acids by the hydrolysis of Euterpe oleracea Martius and Mauritia flexuosa oils, with significant hyperactivations compared to the free enzymes [33].
Immobilization of other enzymes is also treated in this Special Issue. Naranginase (presenting both α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase activities) was immobilized on chitosan particles activated with glutaraldehyde and utilized in the debittering of grapefruit [34]. A carbon screen-printed platform made from ceramic substrate was coated with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) to immobilize acetylcholinesterase and used to quantify acetylcholine [35]. In another paper, an indirect yeast surface display method was described by anchoring Im7 proteins on the surface of Pichia pastoris, using this system to immobilize fluorescence proteins (sfGFP and mCherry) and enzymes (human arginase I) where a CL7 fusion tag has been introduced [36]. Chemical modification (amination of the enzyme surface plus glutaraldehyde treatment) of Alcalase previously immobilized on glyoxyl agarose beads permitted significant improvement of enzyme stability, enabling the use of the enzyme at higher temperatures than the nonmodified enzyme or the free enzyme [37]. Superfolder green (sGFP) and red (RFP) fluorescent proteins have been fused with His-tags to immobilize them on graphene 3D hydrogels, with Cys-tags to immobilize them on porous matrices activated with either epoxy or disulfide groups or with Lys-tags to immobilize them on nanoparticles functionalized with carboxylic groups [38], to spatially tune the protein distribution. Finally, using silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles activated with an immobilized metal chelate or epoxide groups, single operation enrichment and immobilization of a recombinant phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from parsley fused to a poly-histidine affinity tag was accomplished, directly using the culture lysate [39].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sheldon, R.A.; Brady, D. Broadening the scope of biocatalysis in sustainable organic synthesis. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 2859–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sheldon, R.A.; Woodley, J.M. Role of biocatalysis in sustainable chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 801–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sheldon, R.A.; van Pelt, S. Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: Why, what and how. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6223–6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mateo, C.; Palomo, J.M.; Fernandez-Lorente, G.; Guisan, J.M.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rodrigues, R.C.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Torres, R.; Fernández-Lafuente, R. Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6290–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garcia-Galan, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Rodrigues, R.C. Potential of different enzyme immobilization strategies to improve enzyme performance. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 2885–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barbosa, O.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Torres, R.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Strategies for the one-step immobilization-purification of enzymes as industrial biocatalysts. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 435–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Santos, J.C.S.D.; Barbosa, O.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Importance of the support properties for immobilization or purification of enzymes. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 2413–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Editorial: Special issue—Enzyme immobilization. Molecules 2014, 19, 20671–20674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Special issue: Enzyme immobilization 2016. Molecules 2017, 22, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gonçalves, M.C.P.; Kieckbusch, T.G.; Perna, R.F.; Fujimoto, J.T.; Morales, S.A.V.; Romanelli, J.P. Trends on enzyme immobilization researches based on bibliometric analysis. Process Biochem. 2019, 76, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bolivar, J.M.; Nidetzky, B. The microenvironment in immobilized enzymes: Methods of characterization and its role in determining enzyme performance. Molecules 2019, 24, 3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gomes, M.D.; Woodley, J.M. Considerations when measuring biocatalyst performance. Molecules 2019, 24, 3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Boudrant, J.; Woodley, J.M.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Parameters necessary to define an immobilized enzyme preparation. Process Biochem. 2019, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ren, S.; Li, C.; Jiao, X.; Jia, S.; Jiang, Y.; Bilal, M.; Cui, J. Recent progress in multienzymes co-immobilization and multienzyme system applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 1254–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schmid-Dannert, C.; López-Gallego, F. Advances and opportunities for the design of self-sufficient and spatially organized cell-free biocatalytic systems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019, 49, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Velasco-Lozano, S.; López-Gallego, F. Wiring step-wise reactions with immobilized multi-enzyme systems. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2018, 36, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Velasco-Lozano, S.; Benítez-Mateos, A.I.; López-Gallego, F. Co-immobilized phosphorylated cofactors and enzymes as self-sufficient heterogeneous biocatalysts for chemical processes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arana-Peña, S.; Mendez-Sanchez, C.; Rios, N.S.; Ortiz, C.; Gonçalves, L.R.B.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. New applications of glyoxyl-octyl agarose in lipases co-immobilization: Strategies to reuse the most stable lipase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rios, N.S.; Arana-Peña, S.; Mendez-Sanchez, C.; Ortiz, C.; Gonçalves, L.R.B.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Reuse of lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens via its step-by-step coimmobilization on glyoxyl-octyl agarose beads with least stable lipases. Catalysts 2019, 9, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zaak, H.; Kornecki, J.F.; Siar, E.-H.; Fernandez-Lopez, L.; Corberán, V.C.; Sassi, M.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Coimmobilization of enzymes in bilayers using PEI as a glue to reuse the most stable enzyme: Preventing PEI release during inactivated enzyme desorption. Process Biochem. 2017, 61, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peirce, S.; Virgen-Ortíz, J.J.; Tacias-Pascacio, V.G.; Rueda, N.; Bartolome-Cabrero, R.; Fernandez-Lopez, L.; Russo, M.E.; Marzocchella, A.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Development of simple protocols to solve the problems of enzyme coimmobilization. Application to coimmobilize a lipase and a β-galactosidase. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 61707–61715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, Z.; Shi, L.; Yu, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, G. Co-immobilization of tri-enzymes for the conversion of hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-diformylfuran. Molecules 2019, 24, 3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cloete, W.J.; Hayward, S.; Swart, P.; Klumperman, B. Degradation of proteins and starch by combined immobilization of protease, α-amylase and β-galactosidase on a single electrospun nanofibrous membrane. Molecules 2019, 24, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Díaz-Ramos, M.; Miranda, L.P.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Kopp, W.; Tardioli, P.W. Improving the yields and reaction rate in the ethanolysis of soybean oil by using mixtures of lipase CLEAs. Molecules 2019, 24, 4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Cao, L.; Van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R.A. Cross-linked enzyme aggregates: A simple and effective method for the immobilization of penicillin acylase. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1361–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xing, X.; Jia, J.-Q.; Zhang, J.-F.; Zhou, Z.-W.; Li, J.; Wang, N.; Yu, X.-Q. CALB immobilized onto magnetic nanoparticles for efficient kinetic resolution of racemic secondary alcohols: Long-term stability and reusability. Molecules 2019, 24, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Guimarães, J.R.; de Lima Camargo Giordano, R.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Tardioli, P.W. Evaluation of strategies to produce highly porous cross-linked aggregates of porcine pancreas lipase with magnetic properties. Molecules 2018, 23, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Rodrigues, R.C.; Virgen-Ortíz, J.J.; dos Santos, J.C.S.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Alcantara, A.R.; Barbosa, O.; Ortiz, C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Immobilization of lipases on hydrophobic supports: Immobilization mechanism, advantages, problems, and solutions. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 746–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wang, X.; Qin, X.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, B.; Wang, Y. Insight into the modification of phosphatidylcholine with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids-rich ethyl esters by immobilized MAS1 lipase. Molecules 2019, 24, 3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tufiño, C.; Bernal, C.; Ottone, C.; Romero, O.; Illanes, A.; Wilson, L. Synthesis with immobilized lipases and downstream processing of ascorbyl palmitate. Molecules 2019, 24, 3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Dong, Z.; Jiang, M.-Y.; Shi, J.; Zheng, M.-M.; Huang, F.-H. Preparation of immobilized lipase based on hollow mesoporous silica spheres and its application in ester synthesis. Molecules 2019, 24, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Pérez, M.M.; Gonçalves, E.C.S.; Salgado, J.C.S.; De Souza Rocha, M.; De Almeida, P.Z.; Vici, A.C.; Da Conceição Infante, J.; Manuel Guisán, J.; Rocha-Martin, J.; Costa Pessela, B.; et al. Production of omegas-6 and 9 from the hydrolysis of açaí and buriti oils by lipase immobilized on a hydrophobic support. Molecules 2018, 23, 3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Bodakowska-Boczniewicz, J.; Garncarek, Z. Immobilization of naringinase from Penicillium decumbens on chitosan microspheres for debittering grapefruit juice. Molecules 2019, 24, 4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ashmawy, N.H.; Almehizia, A.A.; Youssef, T.A.; Amr, A.E.-G.E.; Al-Omar, M.A.; Kamel, A.H. Novel carbon/PEDOT/PSS-based screen-printed biosensors for acetylcholine neurotransmitter and acetylcholinesterase detection in human serum. Molecules 2019, 24, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Li, S.; Qiao, J.; Lin, S.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L. A highly efficient indirect P. pastoris surface display method based on the CL7/Im7 ultra-high-affinity system. Molecules 2019, 24, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hussain, F.; Arana-Peña, S.; Morellon-Sterling, R.; Barbosa, O.; Braham, S.A.; Kamal, S.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Further stabilization of alcalase immobilized on glyoxyl supports: Amination plus modification with glutaraldehyde. Molecules 2018, 23, 3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Benítez-Mateos, A.I.; Mehravar, E.; Velasco-Lozano, S.; Salassa, L.; López-Gallego, F.; Tomovska, R. Selective immobilization of fluorescent proteins for the fabrication of photoactive materials. Molecules 2019, 24, 2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sánta-Bell, E.; Molnár, Z.; Varga, A.; Nagy, F.; Hornyánszky, G.; Paizs, C.; Balogh-Weiser, D.; Poppe, L. “Fishing and Hunting”—Selective immobilization of a recombinant phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from fermentation media. Molecules 2019, 24, 4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Editorial for Special Issue: Enzyme Immobilization and Its Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4619. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244619

AMA Style

Fernandez-Lafuente R. Editorial for Special Issue: Enzyme Immobilization and Its Applications. Molecules. 2019; 24(24):4619. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto. 2019. "Editorial for Special Issue: Enzyme Immobilization and Its Applications" Molecules 24, no. 24: 4619. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244619

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop