Next Article in Journal
Volatile Compounds of Selected Raw and Cooked Brassica Vegetables
Next Article in Special Issue
Multicomponent Synthesis of Polyphenols and Their In Vitro Evaluation as Potential β-Amyloid Aggregation Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Surface Cleaning Regimen on Glass Ceramic Bond Strength
Previous Article in Special Issue
Melaleuca styphelioides Sm. Polyphenols Modulate Interferon Gamma/Histamine-Induced Inflammation in Human NCTC 2544 Keratinocytes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules24030390
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isorhamnetin, Hispidulin, and Cirsimaritin Identified in Tamarix ramosissima Barks from Southern Xinjiang and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities

by
Xiaopu Ren
1,2,
Yingjie Bao
1,
Yuxia Zhu
1,
Shixin Liu
1,
Zengqi Peng
1,*,
Yawei Zhang
1,* and
Guanghong Zhou
1
1
Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education China, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Xinjiang Production & Construction Group Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing in Xinjiang South, College of Life Science, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(3), 390; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030390
Submission received: 15 December 2018 / Revised: 14 January 2019 / Accepted: 21 January 2019 / Published: 22 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Natural Polyphenols to Synthetic Bioactive Analogues)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As a natural potential resource, Tamarix ramosissima has been widely used as barbecue skewers for a good taste and unique flavor. The polyphenolics in the branch bark play a key role in the quality improvement. The purposes of the present work were to explore the polyphenolic composition of T. ramosissima bark extract and assess their potential antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Hispidulin and cirsimaritin from T. ramosissima bark extract were first identified in the Tamarix genus reported with UPLC-MS analysis. Isorhamnetin (36.91 μg/mg extract), hispidulin (28.79 μg/mg extract) and cirsimaritin (13.35 μg/mg extract) are rich in the bark extract. The extract exhibited promising antioxidant activity with IC50 values of 117.05 μg/mL for 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 151.57 μg/mL for hydroxyl radical scavenging activities, as well as excellent reducing power with an EC50 of 93.77 μg/mL. The bark extract showed appreciable antibacterial properties against foodborne pathogens. Listeria monocytogenes was the most sensitive microorganism with the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 5 mg/mL and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) value of 10 mg/mL followed by S. castellani and S. aureus among the tested bacteria. The T. ramosissima bark extract showed significantly stronger inhibitory activity against Gram-positive than Gram-negative bacteria. Nevertheless, this extract failed to show any activity against tested fungi. Overall, these results suggested that T. ramosissima shows potential in improving food quality due to its highly efficacious antioxidant and antibacterial properties.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Various species of Tamarix, which are widely distributed throughout Europe, America, Asia, and Africa, have been used as herbal medicines in many civilizations due to the presence of polyphenolic compounds [1]. The methanolic extract of dried aerial components of T. gallica from India was found to prevent thioacetamide-promoted oxidative stress and toxicity and exhibited significant properties to reduce the susceptibility of the hepatic microsomal membrane to iron-ascorbate induced lipid peroxidation, H2O2 content, glutathione S-transferase, and xanthine oxidase activities in rats [2]. Yao et al. [3] showed that tamaractam, a new phenolic aromatic ring compound from T. ramosissima tender branches and leaves from the Ningxia province, displayed a strong inhibitory activity on cell proliferation in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes, suggesting that it could remarkably induce cellular apoptosis and increase activated caspase-3/7 levels. Rahman et al [4] indicated that the methanolic extract of T. indica roots from Bangladesh exhibited excellent antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties. Significant writhing inhibition was produced by the extract in acetic acid-induced writhing in mice when comparable to the standard diclofenac sodium drug at the doses of 500 and 25 mg/kg body weight, respectively, and showed a significant anti-inflammatory activity against carrageenan-induced paw oedema in rats at oral doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg body weight compared to the standard drug aspirin. The wide spectrum of these medicinal properties may be mainly attributed to the presence of polyphenolic compounds in Tamarix, such as flavonoids and phenolic acids [1,2].
The leaves and flowers of Tamarix are rich in the polyphenolic compounds [5]. Sultanova et al. [1] identified tamarixetin in the leaves of T. ramosissima from southern Kazakhstan, and showed a high 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity and antimicrobial activity against a number of pathogens, unambiguously specifying that the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of leaves were associated with the presence of polyphenolic compounds. Ksouri et al. [5] showed that syringic acid, isoquercetin and catechin were the major phenolics in the methanolic T. gallica leaf and flower extracts from south Tunis and that the flowers exhibited a higher antioxidant activity than that of the leaves, with IC50 values of the flower extracts being 1.3 (β-carotene bleaching) to 19-fold (lipid peroxidation inhibition) lower than those of leaves due to the higher total phenolic content (TPC). Meanwhile, the antibacterial properties of the leaf and flower methanolic extracts against human pathogen strains were also appreciable with a maximum inhibition zone of 15 mm against Micrococcus luteus. Unfortunately, there were few studies on the identification of polyphenolics, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the stem barks of T. ramosissima from southern Xinjiang.
T. ramosissima is one of the main constructive species in the Tarim River basin native to Northwestern China. In southern Xinjiang, for hundreds of years, green branches of Tamarix have been used as barbecue skewers for a good taste and unique flavor. And based on our previous study, the effective substances were largely concentrated in the bark of the green branches. In the present work, we aim to (i) identify and quantify the major polyphenols present in the green branches bark of T. ramosissima, and (ii) evaluate their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities against foodborne pathogens. We show that hispidulin and cirsimaritin are first identified in the Tamarix genus reported from T. ramosissima bark extract and the extract exhibits satisfying antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, which suggests T. ramosissima shows potential in improving food quality to promote health.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Content and Variety of Total Polyphenolics from T. ramosissima Barks

2.1.1. TPC and Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

Many polyphenolic compounds, which are those containing one or more aromatic ring with one or more hydroxyl groups, act as antioxidants in natural plants due to their redox properties [5]. Flavonoids, which are one group of polyphenolics, are secondary metabolites in plants and act as antioxidants [6]. Many types of polyphenols, such as flavonoids and phenolic acids, were reported in Tamarix species [1,2,7,8,9,10,11]. In this work, the TPC of T. ramosissima bark extract was 323.45 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g, and the TFC was 87.32 quercetin equivalent (QE)/g. When TPC and TFC of the bark extract were compared with the data available for the same genus, it was found that the T. ramosissima bark contained much higher values, as shown in Table 1. The differences between the Tamarix species were obvious, and the TPC of T. ramosissima was 323.45 mg GAE/g extract, which was 9.39, 2.39 and 1.62 times higher than those of T. gallica leaves, T. gallica flowers, and T. aphylla leaves, respectively. The TFC of T. ramosissima in this work was much higher than those of T. gallica leaves and flowers. Additionally, the TPC and TFC varied greatly among different organs, and the bark was a standout organ based on Table 1.

2.1.2. Variety and Content of the Polyphenolics

UPLC-MS data of the bark extract are shown in Table 2 and Figure 1. A total of 13 polyphenolic compounds were identified and, for the first time, hispidulin and cirsimaritin were isolated from the genus Tamarix: they are active ingredients in a number of traditional Chinese herbs [12,13]. Regarding the other main polyphenolics, isorhamnetin was reported to have been identified from T. hispida, T. elongata and T. laxa which were all collected from southern Kazakhstan [11,14]. Quercetin was a common compound in the Tamarix species and had been identified by several researchers [5,8,10,11,15]. Compared to the results of this work, other researchers obtained different polyphenolic compounds from Tamarix. Sultanova et al. identified tamarixetin from T. ramosissima leaves in Kazakhstan [1] and isolated rhamnocitrin, isorhamnetin and a pentacyclic triterpenoid from the aerial components of T. hispida [14]. Ksouri et al. [5] identified polyphenolics from T. gallica leaves and flowers in Tunis, and his results showed that the flower polyphenolics consisted of seven phenolic acids (gallic, sinapic, chlorogenic, syringic, vanillic, p-coumaric, and trans-cinnamic acids), six flavonoids ((+)-catechin, isoquercetin, quercetin, apigenin, amentoflavone, and flavone), 12 phenolic compounds including gallic, sinapic, chlorogenic, syringic, vanillic, rosmarinic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and trans-cinnamic acids, as well as two flavonoids (quercetin and amentoflavone) which were identified from the leaves. Yao et al [3] identified only three compounds, tamaractam, cis-N-feruloyl-3-O-methyldopamine and trans-N-feruloyl-3-O-methyl- dopamine from T. ramosissima in Yinchuan, China.
Meanwhile, a further 4 polyphenolic compounds in high amounts, isorhamnetin, hispidulin, cirsimaritin, and quercetin, were quantified in this work (Table 3). However, no literature was found to quantify the concentration of polyphenolics from Tamarix.

2.2. Antioxidant Activity of the Bark Extract

2.2.1. DPPH Scavenging Activity

The DPPH free radicals have been extensively used to investigate the scavenging activity of natural antioxidants. Figure 2A shows the results of the scavenging DPPH radical activity of T. ramosissima bark extracts. The scavenging activity increased sharply when the concentration increased from 25 to 200 μg/mL and trended towards a plateau after 300 μg/mL (91.70% ± 0.78), at which maximal scavenging activity on the DPPH radicals was reached. There was no significant difference of the scavenging activity between the bark extract groups and the control (ascorbic acid) (p > 0.05) at concentrations of more than 200 μg/mL. There was also no significant difference among the concentrations of 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL of the bark extract groups (p > 0.05). The IC50 value (117.05 μg/mL) of T. ramosissima bark extract for scavenging activity against DPPH was much higher than the results of Ksouri et al. [5], who found that the IC50 values on the DPPH radical of the T. gallica flower and leaf extracts were 2 and 9 μg/mL, respectively, due to the structural conformation of the antioxidants. In the main polyphenols of the T. gallica flower and leaf extracts, the second hydroxyl group of gallic, chlorogenic, and rosmarinic acid and catechin were in the ortho position, while the compounds of sinapic, syringic, vanillic, and ferulic acid had ortho-methoxy substitutions. These compounds in the flower and leaf extracts included a second hydroxyl group in the ortho or para position, and the ortho-methoxy substitution group increased antioxidant efficiencies [16]. However, isorhamnetin and hispidulin in the bark extract had the second hydroxyl group in the meta position. This is potentially the reason for the lower scavenging activity on the DPPH radicals compared to the results of Ksouri et al. [5].

2.2.2. 2,2′-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) (ABTS) Scavenging Activity

The scavenging activity of 2,2′-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) (ABTS) radicals is another widely used method to assess the radical scavenging capacity of natural antioxidants [17]. As shown in Figure 2B, the ABTS radical scavenging activity of the T. ramosissima bark extract increased with the sample concentration. The scavenging activity of the polyphenolics on the ABTS· was correlated with their concentrations [18]. At a concentration of 500 μg/mL, the ABTS radical scavenging activity of the bark extract was 67.02%. The scavenging activities of bark extract groups from 25 to 500 μg/mL were significant lower than those of the control (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were significant differences in the ABTS scavenging activity among the bark extract concentrations (p < 0.05). The IC50 value of the bark extract on the ABTS radicals (314.88 μg/mL) was considerably higher than that of ascorbic acid (82.90 μg/mL), similar to the IC50 of the T. gallica flower extract (316.7 μg/mL), and 3.3 times lower than that of the T. gallica leaf extract [5]. The decreased IC50 of the T. ramosissima bark extract and T. gallica flower extract were probably because of the increased level of TPC and TFC (Table 1). Moreover, the difference in polyphenolic components among the extracts may be one of the reasons for the different scavenging activity on the ABTS radicals.

2.2.3. Superoxide Anion Scavenging Activity

According to Yagi [19], as opposed to the mechanism of DPPH and ABTS radical reactions, the mechanism of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals was peroxide decomposition. The results of scavenging activity on superoxide radicals of the bark extract are presented in Figure 2C. The scavenging activity on the superoxide radical of the bark extract increased for concentrations ranging from 0 to 500 μg/mL. At the concentrations lower than 50 μg/mL of bark extract, there was no significant difference in scavenging activity of superoxide radicals between the bark extract and the control group. The difference in scavenging activity on superoxide radical between the concentrations of 200 and 300 μg/mL of bark extract was not significant. The IC50 value of the bark extract for the superoxide radical was 442.53 μg/mL, much higher than that of the results of Ksouri et al. [5], who found that the IC50 on the scavenging activity of the T. gallica flower and leaf extracts were 3 and 22 μg/mL, respectively. In the T. gallica flower and leaf extracts, hydroxyl groups were located at the 3′- and 4′-positions of the B-ring in quercetin, catechin, and isoquercetin that exhibited much higher scavenging activity on superoxide and hydroxyl radicals [19,20]. In the present work, isorhamnetin, hispidulin, and cirsimaritin in the bark extract possessed only one single hydroxyl group at the 4′-position of the B-ring, which exhibited slight scavenging activity.

2.2.4. Hydroxyl Radicals Scavenging Activity

As Figure 2D shows, the scavenging activities on hydroxyl radicals increased with the concentrations. The hydroxyl radical scavenging activity increased rapidly in the range of 25 to 200 μg/mL, before reaching a plateau from 300 to 500 μg/mL. Significant differences in the activity were found among the concentrations of 25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL of the bark extracts (p < 0.05). The scavenging activities of the bark extract in these concentrations were not significantly different from the ascorbic acid (p > 0.05). The IC50 of the bark extract on the hydroxyl radical was 151.57 μg/mL, which was not significantly higher than that of the ascorbic acid (114.08 μg/mL), suggesting a satisfactory hydroxyl radical scavenging activity. It was evident from Figure 2C,D that the scavenging activity of the bark extract on hydroxyl radicals was stronger than on superoxide radicals. At 200 μg/mL, the bark extract quenched 62.66% of hydroxyl radicals while only quenching 38.28% of superoxide radicals. The stronger scavenging activity on hydroxyl radicals of the bark extract than on superoxide radicals may be associated with the carbonyl function at the C-4 position in the structures of isorhamnetin, hispidulin, and cirsimaritin. The result was in accordance with Husain et al., who found that the presence of a carbonyl functional group at the C-4 position played an important role in the hydroxyl radical quenching ability and that quercetin possessing a carbonyl showed higher quenching ability on the hydroxyl radicals than the carbonyl-devoid catechin [20].

2.2.5. Reducing Power

The reducing power of natural antioxidants, which was determined using a modified Fe3+ to Fe2+ reduction assay, has been declared to be associated with their antioxidant activity [21]. As shown in Figure 2E, the reducing power of T. ramosissima bark extract was excellent and increased with the amount of the extract. The reducing power of bark extract at concentrations below 200 μg/mL increased rapidly with concentrations but was significantly lower compared with the control (p < 0.05). At the concentration of 300 μg/mL, the reducing power of the bark extract was similar to that of ascorbic acid (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were also no significant differences among the concentrations of 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL of the bark extract groups (p > 0.05). The EC50 of the bark extract was 93.77 μg/mL, similar to the EC50 (76.67 μg/mL) of T. gallica leaf extract [5]. However, in another report of Ksouri et al. [22] on T. gallica flower and leaf extracts from a different location, the EC50 values of the reducing power were 84.3 and 205 μg/mL, respectively.

2.2.6. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The mechanism of the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was similar to the reducing power, both of which relied on the ability of antioxidants to reduce iron (III) to iron (II). More specifically, in the FRAP assay, a ferric tripyridyltriazine (FeIII-TPTZ) complex was reduced to the ferrous form (FeII-TPTZ) at low pH value, and several researchers considered the assay as the total antioxidant power [23,24]. In the present work, the trends for ferric ion reducing activities of T. ramosissima bark extract and ascorbic acid are shown in Figure 2F. For both of them, the FeSO4 equivalent (mM/g) clearly increased due to the formation of the Fe2+-TPTZ complex with increasing concentration. The FeSO4 equivalent increased linearly with the concentrations (R2 = 0.9879 for the bark extract, 0.9961 for ascorbic acid). There was no significant difference between the bark extract group and the control at concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 μg/mL (p > 0.05). However, the differences became larger with increasing concentrations. At the concentration of 500 μg/mL, the FeSO4 equivalent was 7.64 mM/g for the bark extract and 12.28 mM/g for the positive control, both of which were higher than those of Barringtonia racemosa and kudingcha crude extracts determined by the same methods [25,26]. Hidalgo et al. [27] found that in the FRAP assay, the polyphenols with 3-hydroxyl group in the C-ring (such as isorhamnetin and quercetin in the bark extract of the present work) showed high antioxidant power and that the antioxidant activity did not decrease when the 3-hydroxyl group in the C-ring was blocked if the 3′,4′-dihydroxy structure in the B-ring was retained (as in the case of quercetin 3-O-glucuronide in the bark extract of the present work).
As previously mentioned, the antioxidant activity of the bark extract of T. ramosissima was satisfactory and the presence of polyphenolics, especially flavonoids, probably played a significant role. The findings of Ksouri et al. [5] largely supported the claims of the present work, which suggests that the extracts of T. gallica showed very high antioxidant activity due to the presence of polyphenolics and that the antioxidant properties exhibit a high positive correlation with polyphenolic content. Sultanova et al. [1] also specifically stated that the antioxidant activity was associated with the presence of polyphenolic substances. In the bark extract of T. ramosissima, different polyphenols exhibited various antioxidant activities. Isorhamnetin, a 3′-O-methylated metabolite of quercetin, exerts excellent antioxidant effects, which reduces oxidative stress due to free radicals by induction of NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-dependent antioxidant genes [28]. Cirsimaritin is a small molecular natural flavonoid, mainly derived from the medicinal plant Herba Artemisiae Scopariae, which exhibits a variety of beneficial activities including antioxidant activity [29]. Quercetin is the typical flavonoid structure and is widely used as a nutritional supplement due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [30]. Hispidulin, also named 6-methoxy-5,7,4′-trihydroxyflavone, has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory and antioxidative activities [31], although the antioxidant activity of hispidulin is very weak compared with quercetin [32]. All of these polyphenolic compounds contributed to the antioxidant activity of the T. ramosissima bark extract. In general, the antioxidant property of a given compound is thought to be closely linked to its structural features, including the ortho-dihydroxy structure in the B-ring, the 2,3 double bond in conjugation with a 4-oxo function, the presence of the 3- and 5-OH functions and glycosidic moieties and the number and position of hydroxyl and methoxy groups [27]. Moreover, the nature of the radical and its specific reaction mechanism also exert great influence on the antioxidant activity of the tested polyphenolics. All of these elements determine the final effects of the polyphenolics.

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial activities of T. ramosissima bark extract at different concentrations are shown in Table 4. For the Gram-positive bacteria, the inhibition zone against Listeria monocytogenes at the concentration of 10 mg/mL of the bark extract was the largest (p < 0.05). The inhibition zones against L. monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus were larger than that of Bacillus cereus at the concentration of 5 mg/mL, and significantly increased with the concentrations (p < 0.05). However, the inhibition zone against S. aureus was not influenced by the concentration of the bark extract. Among these Gram-positive strains, L. monocytogenes was the most sensitive microorganism with the lowest minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values of 10 mg/mL. Excellent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria was also supported by Ksouri et al. [5], who found that the inhibition zone ranged from 7.00 to 15.00 mm at the concentrations of 2, 4 and 100 mg/mL of the T. gallica leaf and flower extracts. For S. aureus, the bark extract in this work showed much larger inhibition zones compared with the T. gallica leaf and flower extracts. The methanol extract of T. indica from Bangladesh also exhibited similar antibacterial activity against S. aureus with an inhibition zone of 10.80 mm [4]. Nevertheless, the T. ramosissima leaf extract from southern Kazakhstan showed no antibacterial activity against S. aureus and B. cereus [1]. The inhibitory effects of the bark extract on bacterial pathogens could be attributed to the isorhamnetin, hispidulin, or cirsimaritin in the T. ramosissima bark extract, of which the purified hispidulin showed antibacterial activity against B. subtilis with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 50 μg/mL and S. aureus with MIC values of 100 μg/mL [33].
The inhibition zones against Gram-negative bacteria were increased with the concentrations (p < 0.05), except in the case of Shigella castellani. In the Gram-negative bacteria, the inhibition zones against S. castellani were the largest (p < 0.05) at the concentrations of 1 or 5 mg/mL of the bark extract. The inhibition zones against Escherichia coli and S. castellani were larger than those of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium at the concentration of 10 mg/mL (p < 0.05). S. castellani was the most sensitive to the bark extract, with the lowest MIC of 5 mg/mL and MBC values of 15 mg/mL. These results were consistent with those of Rahman et al., who found that the T. indica extract exhibited the largest inhibition zones against S. sonnie [4]. In the present work, E. coli was the second most sensitive to the bark extract with a MIC of 10 mg/mL and MBC values of 25 mg/mL. The T. gallica leaf and flower extracts from Tunis also had inhibitory effects on E. coli [5].
Compared to Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria were sensitive to the bark extract, with the mean of inhibition zones significantly larger at the concentrations of 1, 5 and 10 mg/mL (p < 0.05). Similar results can also be observed from the MIC values of these bacteria. These differences in inhibitory effects of the bark extract between Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria may be associated with the different cell wall components of the bacteria [34]. The antibacterial activity of the T. ramosissima bark extract was lower than that of gentamycin (p < 0.05). The T. ramosissima bark extract failed to show any activity against four tested fungi. The results of this work suggested that there may be a huge potential application of T. ramosissima to prevent the growth of foodborne pathogens.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials and Extraction Procedure

Fresh twigs of T. ramosissima were collected from the Tarim River basin on the edge of the Taklamakan desert in Xinjiang (40°25′28.81″ N, 81°14′18.14″ E, Southwest of Alar city) in June 2017. The plant was identified by an expert taxonomist, Mr. Pang, who had been engaged on taxonomic research of Tamarix in South Xinjiang for a significant length of time at Tarim University. The peeled bark off green branches were air-dried and milled to a fine powder (mesh size: 1 mm). Approximately 500 g of powdered barks were soaked in 2500 mL of 60% ethanol for 40 min. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction was used, and the power was 600 W (VCX 750, Sonics, USA). The extracts were filtered through a Whatman no. 4 filter paper and evaporated under vacuum. Then, the vacuum freeze dryer (LGJ-10C, Four-ring, China) was employed to obtain the ethanol extracts and they were stored at −20 °C until analysis. All solvents and reagents were of analytical grade.

3.2. Determination of Total Polyphenolic Content

The TPC in the T. ramosissima bark extract was determined according to the Folin–Ciocalteu procedure as described by Jayasinghe et al [35] with some modifications, using gallic acid as a standard. 0.05 g of the bark extract was dissolved in 2 mL of ethanol-water solution and mixed with 2 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent. The mixture was kept for 3 min at room temperature, and then 2 mL of Na2CO3 solution (10%, w/v) was added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was allowed 1 h to incubate at ambient temperature in the dark, and the absorbance was then read at 530 nm. Deionized water was used as a blank sample. A standard calibration curve of gallic acid (0–0.4 mg/mL) was plotted (R2 = 0.9995). The results were expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalent per gram of the bark extract (mg GAE/g). All analyses were performed in triplicate.

3.3. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

The TFC in the T. ramosissima bark extract was determined using the aluminum chloride colorimetric method as described by Chang et al [36] with some modifications using quercetin as a standard. In this experiment, 0.05 g of the bark extract was dissolved in 2 mL of 80% ethanol and then separately mixed with 0.1 mL of 10% aluminum chloride, 0.1 mL of 1 M potassium acetate and 2.8 mL deionized water. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and the absorbance was then measured at 415 nm. Deionized water was used as a blank sample. A standard calibration curve of quercetin (0–0.1 mg/mL) was plotted (R2 = 0.9991). The concentration of flavonoid was expressed as milligrams of quercetin equivalent per gram of extract (mg QE/g). All analyses were performed in triplicate.

3.4. Analysis of Bark Extract by UPLC-MS

The samples were analyzed using a UPLC-MS following a method previously published, with some modifications [37]. The samples were analyzed by an LC-MS system (G2-XS QTof, Waters). First, 2 μL solutions were injected into the UPLC column (2.1 mm × 100 mm ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column containing 1.7 μm particles) with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Buffer A consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water, and buffer B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The gradient was 5% Buffer B for 0.5 min, 5–95% Buffer B for 11 min, and 95% Buffer B for 2 min. Mass spectrometry was performed using an electrospray source in negative ion mode with the MSe acquisition mode and a selected mass range of 50–1200 m/z. The lock mass option was enabled using leucine-enkephalin (m/z 554.2615) for recalibration. The ionization parameters were the following: capillary voltage was 2.5 kV, collision energy was 40 eV, source temperature was 120 °C, and desolvation gas temperature was 400 °C. For quantification purposes, the four major compounds, isorhamnetin, hispidulin, cirsimaritin, and quercetin (Sigma, USA) were quantified using the calibration curves of their corresponding standards. Data acquisition and processing were performed using Masslynx 4.1 and results were presented as μg/mg extract.

3.5. Determination of Antioxidant Assays

3.5.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH free radical scavenging activity of the T. ramosissima bark extract was conducted according to the method of Yang et al [38], with some modifications. 0.5 mL of the bark extract solution at various concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL) was mixed with 3.5 mL of freshly prepared DPPH-ethanol solution (1 × 10−4 mol/L). The reaction mixture was mixed vigorously for 15 s and then kept in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance was then measured at 517 nm, and the DPPH free radical scavenging percentage was calculated based on the following equation:
DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) = [1 − (A1 − A2)/A0] × 100
where A1 was the Abs of the sample, A2 was the Abs of the sample only (ethanol instead of DPPH), and A0 was the Abs of the control (deionized water instead of sample solution). The bark extract concentration that inhibited 50% of the DPPH radicals (IC50) was calculated and expressed as μg/mL. The ascorbic acid was used as a positive control and conducted in parallel. The experiment was carried out in triplicate.

3.5.2. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

The ABTS free radical-scavenging activity of the T. ramosissima bark extract was determined according to Liu et al. [26]. A mixture (1:1, v/v) of ABTS (7.0 mM) and potassium persulfate (4.95 mM) was incubated at 25 ℃ overnight in the dark to prepare the fresh stock solution. A working solution was prepared by diluting the stock solution with phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4, 0.2 M) to obtain an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. Then, 20 μL of the bark extract solutions at various concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL) were mixed with 200 μL working solution and kept in the dark for 30 min. The absorbance was then measured at 734 nm. The ascorbic acid was used as a positive control, and the ABTS radical scavenging activity was calculated according to the following equation:
ABTS radical scavenging activity (%) = [1 − (A1 − A2)/A0] × 100
where A0, A1 and A2 have the same meaning as in Equation (1). The IC50 value was also calculated and expressed as μg/mL. All the analyses were performed in triplicate.

3.5.3. Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Activity

The superoxide anion radical scavenging of the T. ramosissima bark extract was evaluated based on the method of Liu et al. [39], with slight modifications. The reaction mixture contained 1 mL of 50 μM nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT), 1 mL of 78 μM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), 1 mL of 10 μM phenazine methosulfate (PMS), and 1 mL of the bark extract at different concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 μg/mL). After incubation in the dark for 10 min at 37 °C, the absorbance was measured at 560 nm. The ascorbic acid was used as a positive control and triplicate tests were conducted for each sample. The superoxide anion radical scavenging activity was calculated according to Equation (3):
Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity (%) = [1 − (A1 − A2)/A0] × 100
where A0, A1 and A2 have the same meaning as in Equation (1). The IC50 value was calculated and expressed as μg/mL.

3.5.4. Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity

The hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of the T. ramosissima bark extract was assayed according to Li [40], with some modifications. The hydroxyl radicals were generated in a Fenton reaction by incubating for 60 min at 37 °C in the presence of 1.0 mM FeSO4, 2.0 mM H2O2, 1.0 mM Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1.0 mM sodium salicylate, 20 mM NaH2PO4-Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 7.4), and sample solutions of various concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL) in a final volume of 5 mL. The solutions of FeSO4 and H2O2 were freshly produced in distilled water just before use. After incubation, the absorbance was measured at 532 nm and all samples were determined in three replicates. The results were calculated according to Equation (4):
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity (%) = [1 − (A1 − A2)/A0] × 100
where A0, A1 and A2 have the same meaning as in Equation (1). The IC50 value was calculated and expressed as μg/mL.

3.5.5. Reducing Power

The reducing power of T. ramosissima bark extract was determined according to the method of Ye et al [41] with several modifications. The sample was dissolved in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (pH 6.6, 0.2 M) to afford various concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL). 2.5 mL sample solutions and 2.5 mL of 1% potassium ferricyanide were mixed and incubated at 50 ℃ for 20 min. Then, the mixture was cooled to 25 ℃ and 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid was added. The mixture was centrifuged at 650× g for 10 min. The supernatant (2.5 mL) was mixed with 2.5 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% ferric chloride. After thoroughly mixing, the absorbance was measured at 700 nm by a microplate reader, and the ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. Triplicate tests were conducted for each sample, and a higher absorbance indicated a higher reducing power. The reducing power was calculated according to the formula below:
Reducing power = A1 − A2
where A1 is the absorbance of the sample and A2 is the absorbance of the sample only (distilled water instead of ferric chloride). The EC50 value is the effective dose of the bark extract yielding an absorbance of 0.5 for reducing power and expressed as μg/mL.

3.5.6. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay was performed according to Liu et al. [26], with some modifications. Briefly, 0.2 mL T. ramosissima bark extract solution at different concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL) was added to 3.8 mL of FRAP reagent (10 volumes of 300 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 3.6, 1 volumes of 10.0 mM 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ) solution, and 1 volume of 20.0 mM FeCl3∙6H2O solution), and then the mixture was warmed to 37 °C for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance was then measured at 593 nm. The antioxidant activity was calculated from the calibration curve (y = 0.1446x + 0.0478) in the range from 0.15 to 1.50 mM FeSO4 with good linearity (R2 = 0.9943). The results were expressed as mM FeSO4 equivalent/g extract. The ascorbic acid was used as a positive control, and all analyses were performed in triplicate.

3.6. Determination of Antimicrobial Activity

3.6.1. Microorganisms

The target bacterial strains used in the study were seven American Type of Culture Collection (ATCC) strains: Gram-positive bacteria including S. aureus (ATCC 25923), L. monocytogenes (ATCC 13932), B. cereus (ATCC 11778), and Gram-negative bacteria including E. coli (ATCC 35218), P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), S. typhimurium (ATCC 14028), and S. castellani (ATCC 12022). The strains were first grown in Mueller Hinton (MH, Hopebio, Qingdao, China) broth at 37 °C for 24 h prior to seeding onto the MH agar.
For the antifungal activity, four clinical isolates of Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus niger, Acremonium strictum, and Penicillium citrinum were first grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA, HANGWEI, China) plates at 28 °C for 48 h.

3.6.2. Agar Disc Diffusion Method

The Kirby–Bauer agar disc diffusion method was performed to determine the antibacterial and antifungal activity of the T. ramosissima bark extract following procedures previously described by Ebani et al [42]. Briefly, isolated colonies were selected to prepare the bacterial inocula in sterile saline solutions to obtain a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard, approximately 1 to 2 ×107 CFU/mL. Meanwhile, the fungal spores were picked into the sterile saline solution and adjusted to 104 to 105 CFU/mL. An aliquot of 0.1 mL of bacterial (or spore) suspension was spread onto an MH agar plate (SDA for fungi) and then a sterile filter disc with 6 mm diameter (Whatman paper no. 3), which was impregnated with the bark extract of different concentrations (1, 5, 10 mg/mL) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Oxoid), was placed on the surface of the media. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and 28 °C for 48 h for fungi, followed by the measurement of the diameter of the growth inhibition zone expressed in millimeters (mm). DMSO was used as negative control, with gentamycin and ketoconazole (Amresco, USA) as positive controls for bacteria and fungi, respectively. All tests were performed in triplicate.

3.6.3. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The MIC of the T. ramosissima bark extract was determined for each bacterial strain, which was sensitive to the bark extract of the Kirby-Bauer assay, using the microdilution broth method in 96-well microplates. The tests were carried out in MH broth, and a stock solution (20 mg/mL) of the bark extract was prepared in 10% DMSO. An aliquot of this solution was serially diluted (two-fold) with MH broth to obtain a concentration ranging from 20 to 0.15625 mg/mL. After careful mixing, the microplates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The absorbances of the plates at 620 nm were measured with a multiplate reader (SpectraMax M3, Molecular Devices, USA). The MIC value was defined as the lowest concentration of the bark extract at which there was no visible growth of the microorganisms [43]. The results were expressed as mg/mL, and all tests were performed in triplicate.

3.6.4. Determination of Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

The MBC was determined by adding 100 μL aliquots of the microplate well contents which did not show any growth in the MIC test, to the MH agar and then incubating at 37 °C for 24 h. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration of the bark extract which showed no bacterial growth [43].

3.7. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed in triplicate. The results were expressed as means ± standard deviations. The IC50 values were calculated by linear regression analysis. The statistics analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 22.0) by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). p-value < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

4. Conclusions

In the current work, hispidulin and cirsimaritin were first identified from the bark extract of T. ramosissima in southern Xinjiang. Hispidulin, cirsimaritin, and isorhamnetin, abundant polyphenolics in the extract, were found at levels of 28.79, 13.35 and 36.91 μg/mg extract, respectively. The bark extract showed satisfying antioxidant activity with a similar DPPH scavenging activity and reducing power to ascorbic acid at 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL. The bark extract exhibited excellent antibacterial activities against foodborne pathogens. L. monocytogenes, S. aureus and B. cereus were sensitive to the bark extract compared with E. coli, P.aeruginosa, S. typhimurium and S. castellani. L. monocytogenes was the most sensitive bacteria among these foodborne pathogens. Future investigation should focus on the effects of T. ramosissima on hazardous substance formation and sensory properties during food processing, as well as the potential health-promoting properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.R., Z.P. and Y.Z.; Funding acquisition, Z.P.; Investigation, X.R.; Methodology, X.R., Y.B. and Y.Z.; Project administration, Z.P. and Y.Z.; Resources, X.Z.; Software, S.L.; Writing—original draft, X.R.; Writing—review and editing, Z.P. and G.Z.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (NO. 2018YFD0502306) and the Open Research Fund for Young Teachers in Nanjing Agricultural University and Tarim University (NO. TDNNLH201701).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sultanova, N.; Makhmoor, T.; Abilov, Z.A.; Parween, Z.; Omurkamzinova, V.B.; Atta ur, R.; Choudhary, M.I. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Tamarix ramosissima. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 78, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sehrawat, A.; Sultana, S. Tamarix gallica ameliorates thioacetamide-induced hepatic oxidative stress and hyperproliferative response in Wistar rats. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2006, 21, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yao, Y.; Jiang, C.S.; Sun, N.; Li, W.Q.; Niu, Y.; Han, H.Q.; Miao, Z.H.; Zhao, X.X.; Zhao, J.; Li, J. Tamaractam, a new bioactive Lactam from Tamarix ramosissima, induces apoptosis in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Molecules 2017, 22, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rahman, M.A.; Haque, E.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Shahid, I.Z. Antinociceptive, Antiinflammatory and antibacterial properties of Tamarix indica roots. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 7, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ksouri, R.; Falleh, H.; Megdiche, W.; Trabelsi, N.; Mhamdi, B.; Chaieb, K.; Bakrouf, A.; Magne, C.; Abdelly, C. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the edible medicinal halophyte Tamarix gallica L. and related polyphenolic constituents. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 2083–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lee, K.G.; Shibamoto, T.; Takeoka, G.R.; Lee, S.E.; Kim, J.H.; Park, B.S. Inhibitory effects of plant-derived flavonoids and phenolic acids on malonaldehyde formation from ethyl arachidonate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7203–7207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abouzid, S.F.; Ali, S.A.; Choudhary, M.I. A new ferulic acid ester and other constituents from Tamarix nilotica leaves. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 57, 740–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bikbulatova, T.N.; Korul’kina, L.M. Composition of Tamarix hokenakeri and T. ramosissima. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2001, 37, 216–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohammedi, Z.; Atik, F. Impact of solvent extraction type on total polyphenols content and biological activity from Tamarix aphylla (L.) Karst. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2011, 2, 609–615. [Google Scholar]
  10. Parmar, V.S.; Bisht, K.S.; Sharma, S.K.; Jain, R.; Taneja, P.; Singh, S.; Simonsen, O.; Boll, P.M. Highly oxygenated bioactive flavones from Tamarix. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Umbetova, A.K.; Choudhary, M.I.; Sultanova, N.A.; Burasheva, G.S.; Abilov, Z.A. Flavonoids of plants from the genus Tamarix. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2005, 41, 728–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, H.; Wang, H.; Peng, J. Hispidulin induces apoptosis through mitochondrial dysfunction and inhibition of P13k/Akt signalling pathway in HepG2 cancer cells. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 69, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yan, H.; Wang, H.; Ma, L.; Ma, X.; Yin, J.; Wu, S.; Huang, H.; Li, Y. Cirsimaritin inhibits influenza A virus replication by downregulating the NF-κB signal transduction pathway. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sultanova, N.; Makhmoor, T.; Yasin, A.; Abilov, Z.A.; Omurkamzinova, V.B.; Atta ur, R.; Choudhary, M.I. Isotamarixen—A new antioxidant and prolyl endopeptidase-inhibiting triterpenoid from Tamarix hispida. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ishak, M.S.; El-Sissi, H.I.; Nawwar, M.A.; El-Sherbieny, A.E. Tannins and polyphenolics of the galls of Tamarix aphylla I. Planta Med. 1972, 21, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xie, M.; Hu, B.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, X. Grafting of gallic acid onto chitosan enhances antioxidant activities and alters rheological properties of the copolymer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9128–9136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Oszmianski, J.; Wojdylo, A.; Lamer-Zarawska, E.; Swiader, K. Antioxidant tannins from Rosaceae plant roots. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yagi, K. A rapid method for evaluation of autoxidation and antioxidants. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1970, 34, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Husain, S.R.; Cillard, J.; Cillard, P. Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of flavonoids. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 2489–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Juntachote, T.; Berghofer, E. Antioxidative properties and stability of ethanolic extracts of Holy basil and Galangal. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ksouri, R.; Megdiche, W.; Falleh, H.; Trabelsi, N.; Boulaaba, M.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C. Influence of biological, environmental and technical factors on phenolic content and antioxidant activities of Tunisian halophytes. C. R. Biol. 2008, 331, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay: Direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kong, K.W.; Mat-Junit, S.; Aminudin, N.; Ismail, A.; Abdul-Aziz, A. Antioxidant activities and polyphenolics from the shoots of Barringtonia racemosa (L.) Spreng in a polar to apolar medium system. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, L.; Sun, Y.; Laura, T.; Liang, X.; Ye, H.; Zeng, X. Determination of polyphenolic content and antioxidant activity of kudingcha made from Ilex kudingcha C.J. Tseng. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hidalgo, M.; Sanchez-Moreno, C.; de Pascual-Teresa, S. Flavonoid-flavonoid interaction and its effect on their antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seo, S.; Seo, K.; Ki, S.H.; Shin, S.M. Isorhamnetin inhibits reactive oxygen species-dependent hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α accumulation. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 39, 1830–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Quan, Z.; Gu, J.; Dong, P.; Lu, J.; Wu, X.; Wu, W.; Fei, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. Reactive oxygen species-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to cirsimaritin-induced apoptosis in human gallbladder carcinoma GBC-SD cells. Cancer Lett. 2010, 295, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, B.H.; Choi, J.S.; Yi, E.H.; Lee, J.K.; Won, C.; Ye, S.K.; Kim, M.H. Relative antioxidant activities of quercetin and its structurally related substances and their effects on NF-κB/CRE/AP-1 signaling in murine macrophages. Mol. Cells 2013, 35, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. He, L.; Wu, Y.; Lin, L.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yi, Z.; Liu, M.; Pang, X. Hispidulin, a small flavonoid molecule, suppresses the angiogenesis and growth of human pancreatic cancer by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, Y.T.; Zheng, R.L.; Jia, Z.J.; Ju, Y. Flavonoids as superoxide scavengers and antioxidants. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1990, 9, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Osman, W.J.A.; Mothana, R.A.; Basudan, O.; Mohammed, M.S.; Mohamed, M.S. Antibacterial effect and radical scavenging activity of hispidulin and nepetin; a two flvaones from Tarconanthus camphoratus L. World J. Pharm. Res. 2015, 4, 424–433. [Google Scholar]
  34. Scalbert, A. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3875–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jayasinghe, C.; Gotoh, N.; Aoki, T.; Wada, S. Phenolics composition and antioxidant activity of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4442–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chang, C.C.; Yang, M.H.; Wen, H.M.; Chern, J.C. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J. Food Drug Anal. 2002, 10, 178–182. [Google Scholar]
  37. Esteban-Fernandez, A.; Zorraquin-Pena, I.; Ferrer, M.D.; Mira, A.; Bartolome, B.; Gonzalez de Llano, D.; Victoria Moreno-Arribas, M. Inhibition of oral pathogens adhesion to human gingival fibroblasts by wine polyphenols alone and in combination with an oral probiotic. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2071–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, L.C.; Li, R.; Tan, J.; Jiang, Z.T. Polyphenolics composition of the leaves of Zanthoxylum bungeanum maxim. grown in Hebei, China, and their radical scavenging activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 1772–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, F.; Ooi, V.E.C.; Chang, S.T. Free radical scavenging activities of mushroom polysaccharide extracts. Life Sci. 1997, 60, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, H.; Wang, Q.J. Evaluation of free hydroxyl radical scavenging activities of some Chinese herbs by capillary zone electrophoresis with amperometric detection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 1801–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ye, Z.; Wang, W.; Yuan, Q.; Ye, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zeng, X. Box-Behnken design for extraction optimization, characterization and in vitro antioxidant activity of Cicer arietinum L. hull polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ebani, V.V.; Nardoni, S.; Bertelloni, F.; Giovanelli, S.; Rocchigiani, G.; Pistelli, L.; Mancianti, F. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of essential oils against some pathogenic bacteria and yeasts shed from poultry. Flavour Frag. J. 2016, 31, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bassanetti, I.; Carcelli, M.; Buschini, A.; Montalbano, S.; Leonardi, G.; Pelagatti, P.; Tosi, G.; Massi, P.; Fiorentini, L.; Rogolino, D. Investigation of antibacterial activity of new classes of essential oils derivatives. Food Control 2017, 73, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds (isorhamnetin, hispidulin, cirsimaritin, and quercetin) are not available from the authors.
Molecules 24 00390 g001 550
Figure 1. UPLC-MS chromatogram of polyphenolics in T. ramosissima crude extract infusion: quercetin 3-O-glucuronide (1), kaempferol 3-O-glucuronide (2), eriodictyol (3), quercetin (4), naringenin (5), tangeretin (6), kaempferol (7), hesperetin (8), isorhamnetin (9), hispidulin (10), apigenin (11), glycitein (12), cirsimaritin (13).
Figure 1. UPLC-MS chromatogram of polyphenolics in T. ramosissima crude extract infusion: quercetin 3-O-glucuronide (1), kaempferol 3-O-glucuronide (2), eriodictyol (3), quercetin (4), naringenin (5), tangeretin (6), kaempferol (7), hesperetin (8), isorhamnetin (9), hispidulin (10), apigenin (11), glycitein (12), cirsimaritin (13).
Molecules 24 00390 g001
Molecules 24 00390 g002 550
Figure 2. Scavenging activities on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (A), 2,2′-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) (ABTS) (B), superoxide radicals (C), hydroxyl radicals (D), reducing power (E) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) (F) of the bark extract of T. ramosissima and ascorbic acid. Data are presented as means ± SD of triplicates.
Figure 2. Scavenging activities on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (A), 2,2′-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) (ABTS) (B), superoxide radicals (C), hydroxyl radicals (D), reducing power (E) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) (F) of the bark extract of T. ramosissima and ascorbic acid. Data are presented as means ± SD of triplicates.
Molecules 24 00390 g002
Table
Table 1. Comparison of TPC and TFC with published data of Tamarix family.
Table 1. Comparison of TPC and TFC with published data of Tamarix family.
Tamarix SpeciesTested PartLocationTPC (mg GAE/g)TFC (mg QE/g)Reference
T. ramosissimabarksSouth Xinjiang, China323.45 ± 21.4187.32 ± 1.65This work
T. gallicaleavesSouth Tunis34.44 ± 3.403.91 ± 0.45Ksouri et al. [5]
T. gallicaflowersSouth Tunis135.35 ± 7.7012.33 ± 2.10Ksouri et al. [5]
T. aphyllaleavesSouth Algeria199.54 ± 1.60NDMohammedi [9]
Note: The TPC and TFC were presented as mean ± SD. ND means not detected.
Table
Table 2. Peak identification of T. ramosissima bark extract using UPLC-MS.
Table 2. Peak identification of T. ramosissima bark extract using UPLC-MS.
Peak No.Polyphenolic CompoundsRetention Time (min)Empirical FormulaCalcd m/zObsd m/z [M + H]+Obsd m/z [M − H]+
1Quercetin 3-O-glucuronide4.63C21H18O13478.0747479.0820477.0676
2Kaempferol 3-O-glucuronide5.19C21H18O12462.0798463.0882461.0802
3Eriodictyol6.63C15H12O6288.0634289.0703287.0581
4Quercetin6.77C15H10O7302.0427303.0498301.0404
5Naringenin7.65C15H12O5272.0685273.0753271.0583
6Tangeretin7.72C20H20O7372.1209373.1274371.1253
7Kaempferol7.85C15H10O6286.0477287.0547285.0405
8Hesperetin8.07C16H14O6302.0790303.0856301.0718
9Isorhamnetin9.25C16H12O7316.0583317.0653315.0510
10Hispidulin10.41C16H12O6300.0634301.0705299.0562
11Apigenin10.42C15H10O5270.0528271.0597269.0427
12Glycitein11.90C16H12O5284.0685285.0754283.0664
13Cirsimaritin11.91C17H14O6314.0790315.0863313.0717
Table
Table 3. Concentrations of four representative polyphenolic standards.
Table 3. Concentrations of four representative polyphenolic standards.
CompoundsConcentration (μg/mg)
Isorhamnetin36.9055
Hispidulin28.7915
Cirsimaritin13.3513
Quercetin4.2065
Table
Table 4. Antibacterial activity of T. ramosissima bark extracts at different concentrations. Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).
Table 4. Antibacterial activity of T. ramosissima bark extracts at different concentrations. Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).
Bacterial StrainsThe Extract Concentrations (mg/mL)Diameter of Inhibition ZonesMIC (mg/mL)MBC (mg/mL)
Bark ExtractGentamycin (10 UI)
Gram- positive strainsStaphylococcus aureus110.60 ± 0.54 A20.90 ± 0.14515
511.08 ± 0.71 A
1011.16 ± 0.91 B
Listeria monocytogenes110.14 ± 0.48 cAB20.30 ± 0.42510
511.18 ± 0.21 bA
1012.26 ± 0.61 aA
Bacillus cereus19.53 ± 0.62 bBC18.00 ± 0.00520
59.72 ± 0.16 bB
1010.88 ± 0.30 aB
Gram- negative strainsEscherichia coli19.26 ± 0.65 bC17.80 ± 0.281025
59.58 ± 0.34 bB
1010.68 ± 0.81 aB
Pseudomonas aeruginosa18.20 ± 0.51 bD17.10 ± 0.14>10NA
58.85 ± 0.70 abC
109.38 ± 0.28 aC
Salmonella typhimurium18.00 ± 0.24 bD21.75 ± 0.35>10NA
58.34 ± 0.66 bC
109.48 ± 0.52 aC
Shigella castellani110.65 ± 0.45 A20.90 ± 0.14515
510.74 ± 0.50 A
1011.16 ± 0.69 B
Note: Inhibition zone calculated in diameter around the disc (mean ± SD). Different lowercase letters (a~c) within the same bacteria mean significant differences between different concentrations (p < 0.05); Different capital letters (A–D) within the same concentration mean significant differences between different bacteria (p < 0.05) and no letters indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05). NA represented not active. The diameter of disc was 6 mm. Each experiment was done in triplicate.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, X.; Bao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, S.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, G. Isorhamnetin, Hispidulin, and Cirsimaritin Identified in Tamarix ramosissima Barks from Southern Xinjiang and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. Molecules 2019, 24, 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030390

AMA Style

Ren X, Bao Y, Zhu Y, Liu S, Peng Z, Zhang Y, Zhou G. Isorhamnetin, Hispidulin, and Cirsimaritin Identified in Tamarix ramosissima Barks from Southern Xinjiang and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. Molecules. 2019; 24(3):390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030390

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Xiaopu, Yingjie Bao, Yuxia Zhu, Shixin Liu, Zengqi Peng, Yawei Zhang, and Guanghong Zhou. 2019. "Isorhamnetin, Hispidulin, and Cirsimaritin Identified in Tamarix ramosissima Barks from Southern Xinjiang and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities" Molecules 24, no. 3: 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030390

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop