Next Article in Journal
Parasitic Protozoa: Unusual Roles for G-Quadruplexes in Early-Diverging Eukaryotes
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Polyphenolic Compounds and Pharmacological Activities in Hairy Root Cultures of Ligularia fischeri Turcz. f. spiciformis (Nakai)
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Processing Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of a New-Type of Nutritional Drink—Millet Skim Milk Beverage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuroprotective Effects of an Aqueous Extract of Forsythia viridissima and Its Major Constituents on Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules24071337
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Purification of an Antifungal Peptide from Seeds of Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes and Investigation of Its Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of Action

by
Caicheng Wang
1,2,3,
Yao Zhang
1,2,3,
Weiwei Zhang
1,2,3,
Susu Yuan
1,2,3,
Tzibun Ng
4 and
Xiujuan Ye
1,2,3,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
3
Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
4
School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(7), 1337; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071337
Submission received: 16 March 2019 / Revised: 2 April 2019 / Accepted: 2 April 2019 / Published: 4 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Product Pharmacology and Medicinal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, a 8.5-kDa antifungal peptide designated as BGAP was purified from the crude extract of the seeds of Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes by employing a protocol that comprised cation exchange chromatography on SP-Sepharose, cation exchange chromatography on Mono S and gel filtration chromatography on Superdex peptide. BGAP showed the highest amino acid sequence similarity to defensin peptides by mass spectrometric analysis. BGAP showed a broad spectrum of antifungal activity with a half maximal inhibitory concentration at 17.33 μg/mL, 12.37 μg/mL, 16.81 μg/mL, and 5.60 μg/mL toward Colletotrichum higginsianum, Exserohilum turcicum, Magnaporthe oryzae and Mycosphaerella arachidicola, respectively. The antifungal activity of BGAP remained stable (i) after heat treatment at 40–100 °C for 15 min; (ii) after exposure to solutions of pH 1–3 and 11–13 for 15 min; (iii) after incubation with solutions containing K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ or Fe3+ ions at the concentrations of 20–150 mmol/L for 2 h; and (iv) following treatment with 10% methyl alcohol, 10% ethanol, 10% isopropanol or 10% chloroform for 2 h. Fluorescence staining experiments showed that BGAP brought about an increase in cell membrane permeability, a rise in reactive oxygen species production, a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, and an accumulation of chitin at the hyphal tips of Mycosphaerella arachidicola.

1. Introduction

Plants are often attacked by fungi during growth. Infection by pathogenic fungi produces a deleterious effect on plant growth and may even cause death, ensuing in a plummeting of grain yield [1,2]. The release of certain mycotoxins during the infection process poses a tremendous threat to the safety of agricultural products [3,4]. Although various plant protection strategies such as comprehensive management and ecological management have been proposed, in practice, chemical control remains as the main preventive and control measure for plant diseases [5,6]. Although chemical agents demonstrate certain control effects on a variety of phytopathogenic fungi, the current practice of the use of chemicals is marred by drawbacks. It not only brings about serious environmental pollution and gives rise to the presence of the residues of these chemicals in agricultural products [7], it also aggravates the issue of fungicide resistance [5,8]. Thus, it is of utmost importance to screen for new antifungal substances characterized by safety, high efficiency, environmental friendliness, and lower fungicide resistance. Among the candidates, antifungal peptides have considerable application potential and attracted attention [9,10,11,12].
Antifungal activity has been detected in a diversity of living organisms including microbes, animals and plants, and antifungal peptides have been isolated from them [13,14,15]. For the sake of safety and availability, in our search for antifungal peptides, we have looked more at plants that have long been used as foods. Antifungal peptides, which are important components of plant defense systems, are distributed in the fruits, flowers, leaves, tubers, radicles, and seeds of plants [13,16,17,18,19,20,21], among which peptides derived from seeds are more common. At the early stage of this research, we performed assays of antifungal activity on crude protein extracts from various plant seeds and discovered that the crude protein extract of Kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes) seeds exhibited good antifungal activity against various phytopathogenic fungi. Consequently, in this study, we purified and characterized the antifungal peptide from Kohlrabi seeds extract, studied its antifungal activity and stability, and investigated its effects on pathogenic fungi, with the intent to provide a basis for further unraveling the mechanism of action of the antifungal peptide and broadening the scope of its application.

2. Results

Fraction SP3 with antifungal activity was obtained by cation exchange chromatography of the crude protein extract of Kohlrabi seed extract on SP-Sepharose (Figure 1a). The active fraction MS3 was obtained from fraction SP3 by cation exchange chromatography on Mono S (Figure 1b). The active fraction SU3 was obtained from fraction MS3 by gel filtration chromatography on Superdex peptide (Figure 1c). Fractions not mentioned above did not have antifungal activity. Fraction SU3 contained a highly-purified antifungal peptide, which was named BGAP which showed a molecular weight of about 8.5 kDa in SDS-PAGE (Figure 1d) and was found to have reliable similarity with defensins and thionins by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS analysis, and had the highest similarity with defensin-like protein 1 from Brassica oleracea var. oleracea (Table 1). The defensin peptides listed in the table are peptides predicted by genomic sequences; the details can be obtained from the protein database of the NCIB database according to the accession No. provided in Table 1.
The assay of antifungal activity disclosed that BGAP manifested potent growth inhibitory activity against the following 12 phytopathogenic fungi encompassing Alternaria longipes, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. higginsianum, Exserohilum turcicum, Fusarium oxysporum, F. solani f. sp. glycines, Helminthosporium maydis, Magnaporthe oryzae, Mycosphaerella arachidicola, Pestalotiopsis microspora, and Valsa mali, but expressed only weak activity against F. graminearum and C. micotianae (Figure 2). BGAP was devoid of growth retarding effect on the eight bacteria tested including Bacillus subtilis, Erwinia carotovora, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. pseudoalcaligenes, Ralstonia solanacearum, Salmonella sp., and Staphylococcus aureus. The determination of half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was performed (Figure 3). The IC50 values of BGAP toward Colletotrichum higginsianum, Exserohilum turcicum, Magnaporthe oryzae, and Mycosphaerella arachidicola were 17.33 μg/mL, 12.37 μg/mL, 16.81 μg/mL, and 5.60 μg/mL, respectively. The pronounced stability of the antifungal activity of BGAP was observed after heat treatment at 40–100 °C for 15 min (Figure 4A); after treatment with acid-base solutions of pH 1–3 and 11–13 for 15 min (Figure 4B); following exposure to solutions containing K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ or Fe3+ ions at 20–150 mmol/L for 2 h (Figure 4C–G), and after treatment with methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, and chloroform at a concentration of 10% (Figure 4H).
The fluorescence staining experiments disclosed that following staining with SYTOX green, H2DCFDA and Rhodamine 123, fluorescence was observed in the hyphae of the BGAP-treated group, but not in the hyphae of the control group (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). After staining with Congo red, the fluorescence intensity at the hyphal tips of the BGAP-treated group was significantly stronger than that of the control group (Figure 8), indicating that BGAP engendered an increase in cell membrane permeability, a rise in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, a decline in mitochondrial membrane potential, and accumulation of chitin at the hyphal tips of Mycosphaerella arachidicola.

3. Discussion

The results of mass spectrometric analysis disclosed that BGAP was structurally similar to both defensins and thionins; therefore, we have listed the defensin peptides and thionin peptides recently isolated from plants in Table 2. In terms of antimicrobial activity, BGAP exhibits some similarities and differences compared with them. Among defensin-like peptides, Tf-AFP inhibited growth in Fusarium oxysporum [19]. Large pinto bean defensin exerted an inhibitory action on Fusarium oxysporum and Mycosphaerella arachidicola [21]. Legumi secchi peptide displayed inhibitory activity against Fusarium oxysporum, Helminthosporium maydis and Mycosphaerella arachidicola [22]. Limyin demonstrated inhibitory activity against Botrytis cinerea [23]. BGAP also evinced inhibitory activity against the above pathogenic fungi. On the contrary, limyin did not exhibit significant suppressive activity on Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella sp. Similarly, BGAP did not have antibacterial activity against the eight bacterial species tested including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Both large pinto bean defensin and the legumi secchi peptide were devoid of suppressive activity on Valsa mali. In contrast, BGAP inhibited Valsa mali, indicating that BGAP has a wider spectrum of antifungal action. Thionin-like peptides inhibited and killed fungi as well as Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [24,25,26,27]. The antimicrobial activity of thionins could be inhibited by metal ions [28,29]. However, BGAP was devoid of antibacterial activity and also exhibited certain antifungal activity after treatment with solutions containing K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ or Fe3+ ions. From this perspective, BGAP resembles defensins more than thionins. Table 3 lists the antifungal proteins and peptides previously isolated from Brassica spp. The molecular weights of juncin, brassiparin and kale peptides were 18.9 kDa, 5716 Da, and 5907 Da [30,31,32], respectively, while the molecular weight of BGAP was 8.5 kDa, which was closer to those of campesin (9.4 kDa) and nsLTP (9414 Da) [33,34]. However, both campesin and nsLTP were similar in sequence to lipid transfer protein, while BGAP was structurally similar to defensin, indicating that BGAP is a peptide different from the abovementioned peptides. Nevertheless, BGAP exhibited a broad spectrum of antifungal activity and pronounced stability, which is similar to all of the antifungal proteins and peptides from Brassica spp. In addition, compared to previous reports, we have conducted more research on BGAP in terms of the mode of antifungal action.
BGAP may undermine the growth of fungi by enhancing cell membrane permeability, boosting the production of ROS and disrupting mitochondrial membrane potential. The action of permeabilizing the fungal cell membrane is analogous to the legium secchi peptide, NsW2, and Capsicum annuum peptide listed in Table 2. Membrane permeabilization may involve fusion of antifungal peptide with the cell wall and cell membrane [35,36,37]. Several models related to membrane permeabilization have been proposed, such as the barrel-stave pore model, carpet model and thoroidal pore model [38]. Excessive production of ROS and decline of mitochondrial membrane potential may further trigger apoptosis of mycelial cells, since ROS plays a central role in the regulation of apoptosis [39], and mitochondrial membrane potential acts as a marker of early apoptosis [40]. Cellular ROS accumulation can ensue in the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores, leading to a fall in mitochondrial membrane potential and release of cytochrome c [39,40,41]. Cytochrome c interacts with apoptotic protease-activating factor, which in turn initiates a cascade of caspase activation to bring about apoptosis [42]. BGAP can also induce chitin deposition at the mycelial tip, which is reminiscent of the action of cabbage protein, Fava bean protein VFTI-E1 and Peltophorum ptercoarpum antifungal amidase [43,44,45]. However, the accumulation of chitin at the tip of the mycelium may be a factor that hinders mycelial growth and may also be a countermeasure adopted by pathogenic fungi against antifungal peptides [46]. At present, it is not clear which of the above phenomena mainly accounts for the observed inhibition of fungal growth. How these phenomena are triggered and whether there are more correlations between the phenomena remain to be studied.
To recapitulate, we report herein the isolation and characterization of a potent and stable antifungal peptide with exploitable potential from the seeds of Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Kohlrabi seeds collected in Beijing, China were purchased from a seed vendor. The SP-Sepharose, Mono S 5/50 GL and Superdex peptide 10/300 GL columns used for chromatography were purchased from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ, USA). The 14 phytopathogenic fungi including Alternaria longipes, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. higginsianum, C. micotianae, Exserohilum turcicum, Fusarium graminearum, F. oxysporum, F. solani f. sp. glycines, Helminthosporium maydis, Magnaporthe oryzae, Mycosphaerella arachidicola, Pestalotiopsis microspora, and Valsa mali used in the following experiments were provided by Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. Eight bacterial species comprising Bacillus subtilis, Erwinia carotovora, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. pseudoalcaligenes, Ralstonia solanacearum, Salmonella sp., and Staphylococcus aureus utilized in the experiments described below were obtained from the same aforementioned source.

4.2. Purification of the Antifungal Peptide BGAP

Seeds (150 g) were immersed overnight in 1 L of 10 mM NH4OAc buffer (pH 4.6), homogenized and then left at 4 °C for 12 h. The homogenate was centrifuged (10000× g, 4 °C, 30 min). The resulting supernatant was filtered through four layers of gauze, and the filtrate was collected to obtain a crude extract. The crude extract was chromatographed on a column (5 cm × 16 cm) of SP-Sepharose which had previously been equilibrated with 10 mM NH4OAc buffer (pH 4.6). After the unadsorbed proteins had been eluted from the column, the adsorbed proteins were eluted successively with 10 mM NH4OAc buffer (pH 4.6) containing 0.2 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, and 1 mol/L NaCl. The active fractions with antifungal activity were dialyzed against double-distilled water in a dialysis bag with a molecular weight cut-off of 3500 Da and then freeze-dried into powder form. The protein powders were redissolved in 10 mM NH4OAc buffer (pH 4.6), followed by ion exchange chromatography using a Mono S 5/50 GL column attached to the AKTA Purifier system (GE Healthcare). The column had been pre-equilibrated with 10 mM NH4OAc buffer (pH 4.6) and the adsorbed proteins were eluted with NH4OAc buffer containing a linear gradient of 0-1 mol/L NaCl. The active fractions were collected, dialyzed, lyophilized, and redissolved in NH4OAc buffer and then subjected to gel filtration chromatography using a Superdex peptide 10/300 GL column attached to the AKTA Purifier system (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The absorption peaks SP3, MS3, and SU3 obtained from the various stages of chromatography contained an antifungal peptide with gradually increasing purity.

4.3. Molecular Weight Determination by Tricine-SDS-PAGE, Mass Spectrometry and Determination of Concentration of Antifungal Peptide

The molecular weight of the antifungal peptide was determined by tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (tricine-SDS-PAGE) with a slight modification of the method provided by Schagger [47]. Briefly, the antifungal peptide sample was mixed with loading buffer containing 24% glycerol, 3% β-mercaptoethanol, 10% SDS, 0.02% Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 and 0.1 mol/L Tris buffer (pH 6.8) in a ratio of 4:1 (vol:vol), followed by boiling in water for 5 min. The supernatant was removed for electrophoresis. In the electrophoresis, 4% stacking gel, 10% spacer gel and 16.5% separating gel were used, and gel staining was performed by employing the Coomassie brilliant blue method. After the gel had been destained, the antifungal peptide band in the gel was excised and sent to Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF MS) by using a 5800 MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometric instrument (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). Briefly, the sample in the gel was enzymatically hydrolyzed in a sequencing grade trypsin solution at 37 °C for 20 h. After the enzymatic hydrolysate was removed, 0.1% TFA in 60% acetonitrile was added to the gel and sonicated for 15 min. Subsequently, the enzymatic hydrolysate was combined and desalted by using a ZipTip tip. The sample solution (1 μL) was added to the sample target and allowed to dry naturally, and then 0.6 μL of supersaturated CHCA matrix solution (dissolved in 0.1% TFA in 50% acetonitrile) was added, dried naturally, and analyzed by employing a MALDI-TOF-TOF analyzer. The information regarding the resulting peptide fragments was subjected to a database search using Mascot 2.2 software against NCBInr databases. The peptide concentration used in all experiments was measured with the BCA method using a kit.

4.4. Assay of Antifungal Activity

Pathogenic fungi were inoculated on a PDA medium plate (90 mm × 15 mm culture dish) and cultured at 28 °C. When each fungal mycelium had grown to a diameter of 4–5 cm, four sterile filter paper disks, each with a diameter of 6 mm, were placed 5 mm from the periphery of the mycelial colony. An antifungal peptide solution at a concentration of 1 mg/mL was prepared in 20 mmol/L phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer (pH 7.0). Then 20 μL of the antifungal peptide solution were added to each of the three paper disks, and another 20 μL of PBS buffer was added to the fourth paper disk as a blank control. After the treatment, the plates were continuously cultured at 28 °C, and the growth status of each fungal mycelium was observed within 2–3 days [21].

4.5. Assay of Antibacterial Activity

Activated bacteria were inoculated on LB slant medium and cultured at 37 °C for 20 h. The bacterial suspension was prepared by washing the lawn with a 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution, and the OD600 value of the bacterial suspension was adjusted to 1.0. LB medium (15 mL) was poured into the petri dish, and sterile Oxford cups (8 mm × 10 mm) were placed on the plate after solidification. A 1 mL aliquot of the bacterial suspension was added to 14 mL of LB medium (0.7% agar), cooled to about 50 °C, mixed well, poured into a plate, and after it had solidified, the Oxford cups were taken out. Fifty microliters of antifungal peptide solution (1 mg/mL) were added to each of the three wells in each plate, and 50 microliters of PBS buffer was added to the fourth well as a control. The treated plate was placed at 4 °C for 6 h and then transferred to an incubator at 37 °C. After 16 h of culture, the inhibition zone on the plate was observed.

4.6. Assay of Stability of Antifungal Activity to Temperature Changes, pH Changes and in Presence of Metal Chlorides

An antifungal peptide solution at a concentration of 1 mg/mL was prepared in 20 mmol/L PBS buffer, and 100 μL of antifungal peptide solution was placed in a water bath at 40–100 °C for 15 min. Then the assay was performed to determine the stability of antifungal activity to heat treatment. An antifungal peptide solution at a concentration of 1 mg/mL was prepared in distilled water and was freeze-dried to dry powder. The peptide powder was redissolved in PBS buffer at pH 1–3 and pH 11–13, and placed at 25 °C for 15 min. Then the assay of antifungal activity was performed to determine the stability of the antifungal peptide to acid-base treatment. An antifungal peptide solution at a concentration of 2 mg/mL was prepared in 40 mmol/L PBS buffer, and 50 μL of the solution was added to 50 μL of a solution containing 150 mmol/L KCl, 150 mmol/L CaCl2, 150 mmol/L MgCl2, 150 mmol/L MnCl2 or 150 mmol/L FeCl3. Then the assay of antifungal activity was performed to determine the stability of antifungal activity to treatment with metal ions after the mixture had been incubated at 25 °C for 2 h. An antifungal peptide solution (concentration 2 mg/mL) was prepared in 40 mmol/L PBS buffer, and 50 μL of antifungal peptide solution was added to 50 μL of solutions containing methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and chloroform at a concentration of 10% (v/v). Then the assay of antifungal activity was performed to determine the stability of antifungal activity to treatment with various organic solvents after incubation of the mixture at 25 °C for 2 h. In the above experiments, Mycosphaerella arachidicola was used as the test fungus.

4.7. Assay of Antifungal Activity Based on the Half-maximal Inhibitory Concentration

A solution of the antifungal peptide at a concentration of 250 μg/mL was prepared in PBS buffer and serially diluted three times. One milliliter of the antifungal peptide solution filtered through a 0.22 μm sterile filter was added to 4 mL of PDA medium cooled to about 50 °C, and mixed and poured into a petri dish (55 mm × 15 mm). A 5-mm diameter of the fungus was cut at the edge of the activated fungal colony using a sterilizing punch and inoculated on the above plate. The inoculated plate was cultured at 28 °C, and the diameter of the mycelial colony of the pathogenic fungus was measured every 12 h [45]. In the control group, the antifungal peptide solution was replaced by the same volume of PBS buffer, and there were three replicates in each of the treatment groups and the control group. The fungi tested included Colletotrichum higginsianum, Exserohilum turcicum, Magnaporthe oryzae and Mycosphaerella arachidicola. The growth inhibition rate was calculated using the following formula: (inhibition of fungal growth = (1 − mycelial colony area of treatment group/mycelial colony area of control group) × 100%). The half maximal inhibitory concentration of the antifungal peptide against each pathogenic fungus was calculated by utilizing the GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

4.8. Assays of Cell Membrane Permeability Changes, Reactive Oxygen Species Production, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Changes and Chitin Accumulation in the Fungus Mycosphaerella arachidicola

The fungal hyphae cultured in medium containing the antifungal peptide were stained with the fluorescent dyes SYTOX green, H2DCFDA, Rhodamine 123, and Congo red, respectively, to perform assays of cell membrane permeability change, reactive oxygen species accumulation, mitochondrial membrane potential change, and chitin accumulation, respectively [22,45,48,49,50]. Mycosphaerella arachidicola was used as the test fungus. The test fungus was inoculated into PD liquid medium, and the antifungal peptide was added to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL after culture with shaking (150 rmp/min) at a constant temperature (28 °C) for 2 days. The same volume of PBS buffer was added in the control group. The hyphae used for SYTOX green, H2DCFDA and Rhodamine 123 staining were collected after 12 h of culture, and the hyphae used for Congo red staining was collected after 24 h of cultivation. The hyphae were resuspended in 500 μL of PBS buffer, then mixed with 1 μL of fluorescent dye and stained for 30 min in the dark. After excess stain had been removed by washing with PBS buffer, the hyphae were picked to prepare smears, and the staining results were observed under a fluorescence microscope. Among the above fluorescent dyes, SYTOX green is a high-affinity nucleic acid dye that can enter cells when the plasma membrane is damaged, and the concentration used in the experiment was 5 mmol/mL. H2DCFDA is a cell osmotic indicator of ROS that fluoresces after deacetylation by intracellular esters and oxidation by ROS, and the concentration used in the experiment was 2 mg/mL. Rhodamine 123 is a cationic fluorescent dye that can penetrate cell membranes. It can rely on the mitochondrial transmembrane potential to enter the mitochondrial matrix in normal cells. Then the fluorescence intensity will become attenuated or disappear. The concentration of Rhodamine 123 used in the experiment was 2 mg/mL. Congo red can be tightly bound to chitin, and the concentration used in the experiment was 1.5 mg/mL.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, S.Y.; Investigation, C.W. and Y.Z.; Methodology, W.Z.; Project administration, X.Y.; Writing—original draft, C.W., T.N. and X.Y.

Funding

This research was funded by the University-Industry Cooperation Project of Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology, grant number 2018N5005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fisher, M.C.; Henk, D.A.; Briggs, C.J.; Brownstein, J.S.; Madoff, L.C.; McCraw, S.L.; Gurr, S.J. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 2012, 484, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Godfray, H.C.J.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Robinson, S. Food system consequences of a fungal disease epidemic in a major crop. Philos. Trans R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pitt, J.I.; Miller, J.D. A concise history of mycotoxin research. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7021–7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liew, W.P.P.; Mohd-Redzwan, S. Mycotoxin: its impact on gut health and microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hirooka, T.; Ishii, H. Chemical control of plant diseases. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2013, 79, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, D.C.; Zhan, J.S.; Xie, L.H. Problems, challenges and future of plant disease management: from an ecological point of view. J. Integr. Agr. 2016, 15, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hou, B.; Wu, L.H. Safety impact and farmer awareness of pesticide residues. Food Agr. Immunol. 2010, 21, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Price, C.L.; Parker, J.E.; Warrilow, A.G.S.; Kelly, D.E.; Kelly, S.L. Azole fungicides-understanding resistance mechanisms in agricultural fungal pathogens. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 1054–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Meyer, V. A small protein that fights fungi: AFP as a new promising antifungal agent of biotechnological value. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2008, 78, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kaur, J.; Sagaram, U.S.; Shah, D. Can plant defensins be used to engineer durable commercially useful fungal resistance in crop plants? Fungal Biol. Rev. 2011, 25, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, J.; Yuan, S.S.; Jiang, L.L.; Ye, X.J.; Ng, T.B.; Wu, Z.J. Plant antifungal proteins and their applications in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2015, 99, 4961–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Leiter, E.; Gall, T.; Csernoch, L.; Pocsi, I. Biofungicide utilizations of antifungal proteins of filamentous ascomycetes: current and foreseeable future developments. Biocontrol 2017, 62, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, J.K.; Gopal, R.; Seo, C.H.; Cheong, H.; Park, Y. Isolation and purification of a novel deca-antifungal peptide from potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Jopung) against Candida albicans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 4021–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ibrahim, M.; Kaushik, N.; Sowemimo, A.; Chhipa, H.; Koekemoer, T.; van de Venter, M.; Odukoya, O.A. Antifungal and antiproliferative activities of endophytic fungi isolated from the leaves of Markhamia tomentosa. Pharm. Biol. 2017, 55, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yan, H.; Yun, J.; Ai, D.; Zhang, W.; Bai, J.; Guo, J. Two novel cationic antifungal peptides isolated from Bacillus pumilus HN-10 and their inhibitory activity against Trichothecium roseum. World J. Microb. Biot. 2018, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mandal, S.M.; Migliolo, L.; Franco, O.L.; Ghosh, A.K. Identification of an antifungal peptide from Trapa natans fruits with inhibitory effects on Candida tropicalis biofilm formation. Peptides 2011, 32, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Astafieva, A.A.; Rogozhin, E.A.; Andreev, Y.A.; Odintsova, T.I.; Kozlov, S.A.; Grishin, E.V.; Egorov, T.A. A novel cysteine-rich antifungal peptide ToAMP4 from Taraxacum officinale Wigg. flowers. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2013, 70, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mandal, S.M.; Porto, W.F.; Dey, P.; Maiti, M.K.; Ghosh, A.K.; Franco, O.L. The attack of the phytopathogens and the trumpet solo: identification of a novel plant antifungal peptide with distinct fold and disulfide bond pattern. Biochimie 2013, 95, 1939–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Oddepally, R.; Guruprasad, L. Isolation, purification, and characterization of a stable defensin-like antifungal peptide from Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) seeds. Biochemistry 2015, 80, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rogozhin, E.A.; Slezina, M.P.; Slavokhotova, A.A.; Istomina, E.A.; Korostyleva, T.V.; Smirnov, A.N.; Grishin, E.V.; Egorov, T.A.; Odintsova, T.I. A novel antifungal peptide from leaves of the weed Stellaria media L. Biochimie 2015, 116, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yin, C.; Wong, J.H.; Ng, T.B. Isolation of a hemagglutinin with potent antiproliferative activity and a large antifungal defensin from Phaseolus vulgaris cv. hokkaido large pinto beans. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 5439–5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lam, S.K.; Ng, T.B. Purification and characterization of an antifungal peptide with potent antifungal activity but devoid of antiproliferative and HIV reverse transcriptase activities from legumi secchi beans. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 2013, 169, 2165–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, S.Y.; Rao, P.F.; Ye, X.Y. Isolation and biochemical characterization of a novel leguminous defense peptide with antifungal and antiproliferative potency. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2009, 82, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vasilchenko, A.S.; Smirnov, A.N.; Zavriev, S.K.; Grishin, E.V.; Vasilchenko, A.V.; Rogozhin, E.A. Novel thionins from black seed (Nigella sativa L.) demonstrate antimicrobial activity. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2017, 23, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Taveira, G.B.; Mathias, L.S.; da Motta, O.V.; Machado, O.L.T.; Rodrigues, R.; Carvalho, A.O.; Teixeira-Ferreira, A.; Perales, J.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Gomes, V.M. Thionin-like peptides from Capsicum annuum fruits with high activity against human pathogenic bacteria and yeasts. Biopolymers 2014, 102, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Franco, O.L.; Murad, A.M.; Leite, J.R.; Mendes, P.A.M.; Prates, M.V.; Bloch, C. Identification of a cowpea gamma-thionin with bactericidal activity. Febs J. 2006, 273, 3489–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fujimura, M.; Ideguchi, M.; Minami, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Tadera, K. Purification, characterization, and sequencing of novel antimicrobial peptides, Tu-AMP 1 and Tu-AMP 2, from bulbs of tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L.). Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 2004, 68, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. De Lucca, A.J.; Cleveland, T.E.; Wedge, D.E. Plant-derived antifungal proteins and peptides. Can. J. Microbiol. 2005, 51, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van der Weerden, N.L.; Bleackley, M.R.; Anderson, M.A. Properties and mechanisms of action of naturally occurring antifungal peptides. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 3545–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ye, X.; Ng, T.B. Isolation and characterization of juncin, an antifungal protein from seeds of japanese takana (Brassica juncea var. integrifolia). J. Agr. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4366–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, P.; Ng, T.B. Brassiparin, an antifungal peptide from Brassica parachinensis seeds. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, P.; Ng, T.B. A novel and exploitable antifungal peptide from kale (Brassica alboglabra) seeds. Peptides 2008, 29, 1664–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, P.; Wong, J.H.; Xia, L.; Ng, T.B. Campesin, a thermostable antifungal peptide with highly potent antipathogenic activities. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 108, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lin, P.; Xia, L.; Wong, J.H.; Ng, T.B.; Ye, X.; Wang, S.; Shi, X. Lipid transfer proteins from Brassica campestris and mung bean surpass mung bean chitinase in exploitability. J. Pept. Sci. 2007, 13, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thevissen, K.; Osborn, R.W.; Acland, D.P.; Broekaert, W.F. Specific, high affinity binding sites for an antifungal plant defensin on Neurospora crassa hyphae and microsomal membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32176–32181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thevissen, K.; Warnecke, D.C.; Francois, E.J.A.; Leipelt, M.; Heinz, E.; Ott, C.; Zahringer, U.; Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Ferkel, K.K.A.; Cammue, B.P.A. Defensins from insects and plants interact with fungal glucosylceramides. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 3900–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cools, T.L.; Vriens, K.; Struyfs, C.; Verbandt, S.; Ramada, M.H.S.; Brand, G.D.; Bloch, C.; Koch, B.; Traven, A.; Drijfhout, J.W.; et al. The Antifungal plant defensin HsAFP1 is a phosphatidic acid-interacting peptide inducing membrane permeabilization. Front Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Palffy, R.; Gardlik, R.; Behuliak, M.; Kadasi, L.; Turna, J.; Celec, P. On the physiology and pathophysiology of antimicrobial peptides. Mol. Med. 2009, 15, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  39. Aerts, A.M.; Bammens, L.; Govaert, G.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Madeo, F.; Cammue, B.P.A.; Thevissen, K. The antifungal plant defensin HsAFP1 from Heuchera sanguinea induces apoptosis in Candida albicans. Front Microbiol. 2011, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Krysko, D.V.; Roels, F.; Leybaert, L.; D’Herde, K. Mitochondrial transmembrane potential changes support the concept of mitochondrial heterogeneity during apoptosis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2001, 49, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Circu, M.L.; Aw, T.Y. Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. Free Radical Bio. Med. 2010, 48, 749–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Savitskaya, M.A.; Onishchenko, G.E. Mechanisms of apoptosis. Biochemistry 2015, 80, 1393–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fang, E.F.; Hassanien, A.A.E.; Wong, J.H.; Bah, C.S.F.; Soliman, S.S.; Ng, T.B. Purification and modes of antifungal action by Vicia faba cv. egypt trypsin inhibitor. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 10729–10735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lam, S.K.; Ng, T.B. First report of an antifungal amidase from Peltophorum ptercoarpum. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2010, 24, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ye, X.J.; Ng, T.B.; Wu, Z.J.; Xie, L.H.; Fang, E.F.; Wong, J.H.; Pan, W.L.; Wing, S.S.C.; Zhang, Y.B. Protein from red cabbage (Brassica oleracea) seeds with antifungal, antibacterial, and anticancer activities. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 10232–10238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Delgado, J.; Owens, R.A.; Doyle, S.; Asensio, M.A.; Nunez, F. Increased chitin biosynthesis contributes to the resistance of Penicillium polonicum against the antifungal protein PgAFP. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2016, 100, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schagger, H. Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brambila Vieira, M.E.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Tavares Machado, O.L.; Gomes, V.M.; Carvalho, A.D.O. Isolation, characterization and mechanism of action of an antimicrobial peptide from Lecythis pisonis seeds with inhibitory activity against Candida albicans. Acta Bioch. Bioph. Sin. 2015, 47, 716–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ghosh, P.; Roy, A.; Hess, D.; Ghosh, A.; Das, S. Deciphering the mode of action of a mutant Allium sativum leaf agglutinin (mASAL), a potent antifungal protein on Rhizoctonia solani. Bmc Microbiol. 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wong, J.H.; Lau, K.M.; Wu, Y.O.; Cheng, L.; Wong, C.W.; Yew, D.T.W.; Leung, P.C.; Fung, K.P.; Hui, M.; Ng, T.B.; et al. Antifungal mode of action of macrocarpal C extracted from Eucalyptus globulus Labill (Lan An) towards the dermatophyte Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Chin. Med. 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 24 01337 g001a 550Molecules 24 01337 g001b 550
Figure 1. Purification and molecular weight determination of BGAP: (a) cation exchange chromatography of crude protein extract on SP-Sepharose column: (−): absorbance at 280 nm, (…): concentration of NaCl; (b) cation exchange chromatography of active fraction SP3 from SP-Sepharose column on Mono S column; (c) gel filtration chromatography of active fraction MS3 from Mono S column on Superdex peptide column; (d) Tricine-SDS-PAGE of active fraction SU3 from Superdex peptide column.
Figure 1. Purification and molecular weight determination of BGAP: (a) cation exchange chromatography of crude protein extract on SP-Sepharose column: (−): absorbance at 280 nm, (…): concentration of NaCl; (b) cation exchange chromatography of active fraction SP3 from SP-Sepharose column on Mono S column; (c) gel filtration chromatography of active fraction MS3 from Mono S column on Superdex peptide column; (d) Tricine-SDS-PAGE of active fraction SU3 from Superdex peptide column.
Molecules 24 01337 g001aMolecules 24 01337 g001b
Molecules 24 01337 g002 550
Figure 2. Growth inhibitory effects of BGAP represented by fraction SU3 toward 14 phytopathogenic fungi: (A) Alternaria longipes; (B) Botrytis cinerea; (C) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; (D) Colletotrichum higginsianum; (E) Colletotrichum micotianae; (F) Exserohilum turcicum; (G) Fusarium graminearum; (H) Fusarium oxysporum; (I) Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines; (J) Helminthosporium maydis; (K) Magnaporthe oryzae; (L) Mycosphaerella arachidicola; (M) Pestalotiopsis microspora; and (N) Valsa mali; a: 20 μL of BGAP solution (1 mg/mL); b: 20 μL of PBS buffer.
Figure 2. Growth inhibitory effects of BGAP represented by fraction SU3 toward 14 phytopathogenic fungi: (A) Alternaria longipes; (B) Botrytis cinerea; (C) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; (D) Colletotrichum higginsianum; (E) Colletotrichum micotianae; (F) Exserohilum turcicum; (G) Fusarium graminearum; (H) Fusarium oxysporum; (I) Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines; (J) Helminthosporium maydis; (K) Magnaporthe oryzae; (L) Mycosphaerella arachidicola; (M) Pestalotiopsis microspora; and (N) Valsa mali; a: 20 μL of BGAP solution (1 mg/mL); b: 20 μL of PBS buffer.
Molecules 24 01337 g002
Molecules 24 01337 g003 550
Figure 3. IC50 determination of BGAP toward four phytopathogenic fungi: (A) Colletotrichum higginsianum; (B) Exserohilum turcicum; (C) Magnaporthe oryzae; and (D) Mycosphaerella arachidicola; numerical value represents the concentration (μg/mL) of BGAP in the medium.
Figure 3. IC50 determination of BGAP toward four phytopathogenic fungi: (A) Colletotrichum higginsianum; (B) Exserohilum turcicum; (C) Magnaporthe oryzae; and (D) Mycosphaerella arachidicola; numerical value represents the concentration (μg/mL) of BGAP in the medium.
Molecules 24 01337 g003
Molecules 24 01337 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of heat, acid-base, metal ions, and organic solvents on antifungal activity of BGAP: (A) heat treatment; (B) acid-base treatment; (C) treatment with K+ ions; (D) treatment with Ca2+ ions; (E) treatment with Mg2+ ions; (F) treatment with Mn2+ ions; (G) treatment with Fe3+ ions; (H) organic solvent treatment; a: 20 μL of untreated BGAP solution; b: 20 μL of PBS buffer; c: 20 μL of K+ solution (150 mmol/L); d: 20 μL of Ca2+ solution (150 mmol/L); e: 20 μL of Mg2+ solution (150 mmol/L); f: 20 μL of Mn2+ solution (150 mmol/L); g: 20 μL of Fe3+ solution (150 mmol/L); h: 20 μL of 10% methanol; i: 20 μL of 10% ethanol; j: 20 μL of 10% isopropanol; k: 20 μL of 10% chloroform; 40–100 °C represents 20 μL of BGAP solution treated at the corresponding temperature; pH 1–13 represents 20 μL of BGAP solution treated with the corresponding acid-base; 20–150 represents 20 μL of BGAP solution treated with each metal ion at a concentration of 20–150 mmol/L; l, m, n, o represent BGAP solution treated with 10% methanol, 10% ethanol, 10% isopropanol and 10% chloroform respectively; and the final concentration of BGAP in all treatment groups was 1 mg/mL.
Figure 4. Effects of heat, acid-base, metal ions, and organic solvents on antifungal activity of BGAP: (A) heat treatment; (B) acid-base treatment; (C) treatment with K+ ions; (D) treatment with Ca2+ ions; (E) treatment with Mg2+ ions; (F) treatment with Mn2+ ions; (G) treatment with Fe3+ ions; (H) organic solvent treatment; a: 20 μL of untreated BGAP solution; b: 20 μL of PBS buffer; c: 20 μL of K+ solution (150 mmol/L); d: 20 μL of Ca2+ solution (150 mmol/L); e: 20 μL of Mg2+ solution (150 mmol/L); f: 20 μL of Mn2+ solution (150 mmol/L); g: 20 μL of Fe3+ solution (150 mmol/L); h: 20 μL of 10% methanol; i: 20 μL of 10% ethanol; j: 20 μL of 10% isopropanol; k: 20 μL of 10% chloroform; 40–100 °C represents 20 μL of BGAP solution treated at the corresponding temperature; pH 1–13 represents 20 μL of BGAP solution treated with the corresponding acid-base; 20–150 represents 20 μL of BGAP solution treated with each metal ion at a concentration of 20–150 mmol/L; l, m, n, o represent BGAP solution treated with 10% methanol, 10% ethanol, 10% isopropanol and 10% chloroform respectively; and the final concentration of BGAP in all treatment groups was 1 mg/mL.
Molecules 24 01337 g004
Molecules 24 01337 g005 550
Figure 5. Permeabilization of Mycosphaerella arachidicola hyphal membrane caused by BGAP.
Figure 5. Permeabilization of Mycosphaerella arachidicola hyphal membrane caused by BGAP.
Molecules 24 01337 g005
Molecules 24 01337 g006 550
Figure 6. Increase in ROS production of Mycosphaerella arachidicola caused by BGAP.
Figure 6. Increase in ROS production of Mycosphaerella arachidicola caused by BGAP.
Molecules 24 01337 g006
Molecules 24 01337 g007 550
Figure 7. Decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential of Mycosphaerella arachidicola caused by BGAP.
Figure 7. Decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential of Mycosphaerella arachidicola caused by BGAP.
Molecules 24 01337 g007
Molecules 24 01337 g008 550
Figure 8. Accumulation of chitin at the hyphal tips of Mycosphaerella arachidicola caused by BGAP.
Figure 8. Accumulation of chitin at the hyphal tips of Mycosphaerella arachidicola caused by BGAP.
Molecules 24 01337 g008
Table
Table 1. MALDI-TOF/TOF MS results of various peptides derived from BGAP.
Table 1. MALDI-TOF/TOF MS results of various peptides derived from BGAP.
Protein/PeptideAccession No.Species of OriginMol wtSequenceProtein ScoreProtein Score C.I. %
defensin-like protein 1XP_013619391.1Brassica oleracea var. oleracea8694.2 DaMAKFASIIALLFAALVLFAALEAPTMVEAQKLCERPSGTWSGVCGNNNACKNQCINLEKARHGSCNYVFPAHKCICYFPC112100
thioninBAM15659.1Brassica oleracea var. viridis7194.5 DaVALLFSALVIFAAFEAPTMVEAQKLCERPSGTWSGVCGNNNACKNQCIRLEKARHGSCNYVFPAHK8999.99
defensin-like protein 1XP_013590720.1Brassica oleracea var. oleracea8784.3 DaMAKFASIIVLLFAALVLFAGFEAPTMVEAQKLCERPSGTWSGVCGNNNACKNQCIRLEKARHGSCNYVFPAHKCICYFPC8899.99
thioninBAM15658.1Brassica oleracea var. viridis6328.1 DaIVLLFAEAPTMVEAQKLCERPSGTWSGVCGNNNGCKNQGIRLEKARHGSCNYVFPAHK8399.97
defensin-like protein 3XP_013590858.1Brassica oleracea var. oleracea8619.1 DaMAKAATITTFLFAALVLFAAFEAPTMVDAKLCERPSGTWSGVCGNNNECKKQCIRLEGARHGSCNYVFPAHKCICYFPC8299.97
defensin-like protein 4XP_013635185.1Brassica oleracea var. oleracea10573.2 DaMDKATKSVSSLAAFFILFLVIFEMPEIEAQDSECLKEYGGDVGFGFCAPRIYPTFCVKRCRADKGALGGKCIWGQGSNVKCLCNFCRPEPGQILSGI7799.88
defensin-like protein 195XP_013634959.1Brassica oleracea var. oleracea9897.7 DaMAIKPLSIFVVFFIFFLVISDMPETEAQDSKCLREYGGDVGFGFCAPRIFPTICYTRCRENKGAKGGRCRWGQGTNVTCLCDYCNDQP6698.36
Table
Table 2. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of BGAP with defensin-like peptides and thionin-like peptides isolated from other plants.
Table 2. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of BGAP with defensin-like peptides and thionin-like peptides isolated from other plants.
TypePeptideSpecies of OriginAntimicrobial Activity Toward Fungi or BacteriaRef.
BGAPBrassica oleracea var. gongylodesFungi:Colletotrichum higginsianum (17.33 μg/mLa), Exserohilum turcicum (12.37 μg/mLa), Magnaporthe oryzae (16.81 μg/mLa), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (5.60 μg/mLa), etc.This study
Defensin-like peptideTf-AFPTrigonella foenum-graecumFungi:Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, Rhizoctonia solani[19]
Large pinto bean defensinPhaseolus vulgarisFungi:Bipolaris maydis, Fusarium oxysporum, Mycosphaerella arachidicola, Setosphaeria turcica, Valsa mali (no effect)[21]
Legumi secchi peptidePhaseolus vulgarisFungi:Fusarium oxysporum (9.2 μMa), Helminthosporium maydis (9.5 μMa), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (1 μMa), Rhizoctonia solani (3.5 μMa), Valsa mali (no effect)[22]
LimyinPhaseolus limensisFungi:Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium solani (8.6 μMa), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (no effect), Pythium aphanidermatum (no effect)
Bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (no effect), Salmonella sp. (no effect)		[23]
Thionin-like peptideNsW2Nigella sativaFungi:Candida albicans (1.63 μMa)
Bacteria: Bacillus subtilis (1.63 μMa), Escherichia coli (>26.0 μMa), Staphylococcus aureus (3.25 μMa)		[24]
Capsicum annuum peptideCapsicum annuumFungi:Candida albicans (96%b, 100 μg/mLc), Candida tropicalis (100%b, 100 μg/mLc), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (98%b, 100 μg/mLc)
Bacteria: Escherichia coli (18%b, 100 μg/mLc), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10%b, 100 μg/mLc)		[25]
Cp-thionin IIVigna unguiculataBacteria:Escherichia coli (64 μg/mLd), Pseudomonas syringae (42 μg/mLd), Staphylococcus aureus (128 μg/mLd), Erwinia sp. (no effect), Ralstonia solanacearum (no effect); Rhataybacter sp. (no effect)[26]
Tu-AMP 1Tulipa gesnerianaFungi:Fusarium oxysporum (2 μg/mLa), Geotrichum candidum (2 μg/mLa); Agrobacterium radiobacter (15 μg/mLa)
Bacteria: Agrobacterium rhizogenes (20 μg/mLa), Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens (13 μg/mLa), Clavibacter michiganensis (14 μg/mLa), Erwinia carotovora (11 μg/mLa)		[27]
a: half maximal inhibitory concentration; b: growth inhibition rate; c: tested peptide concentration; d: minimum inhibitory concentration.
Table
Table 3. Comparison of characteristics of BGAP with antifungal proteins and peptides isolated from Brassica spp.
Table 3. Comparison of characteristics of BGAP with antifungal proteins and peptides isolated from Brassica spp.
Protein/PeptideSpecies of OriginMol (wt)Antifungal ActivityStabilityReported EffectRef.
BGAPBrassica oleracea var. gongylodes8.5 kDaColletotrichum higginsianum (16.94 μg/mL), Exserohilum turcicum (12.30 μg/mL), Magnaporthe oryzae (16.45 μg/mL), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (5.70 μg/mL), etc.40–100 °C; pH 1–3, pH 11–13; methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, chloroform (10%); Ca2+, Fe3+, K+, Mg2+ (20–150 mM)Accumulation of chitin at the tip of mycelium, membrane permeabilization, change of mitochondrial membrane potential, ROS generationThis study
JuncinBrassica juncea var. integrifolia18.9 kDaFusarium oxysporum (13.5 μM), Helminthosporium maydis (27 μM), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (10 μM), Candida albicansNot testedNo membrane permeabilization (toward Candida albicans) and chitin deposition (toward Mycosphaerella arachidicola)[30]
Brassiparin5716 kDaBrassica parachinensisFusarium oxysporum (3.9 μM), Helminthosporium maydis (4.7 μM), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (2.6 μM), Valsa mali (0.22 μM)40–100 °C; pH 1–3, pH 11–13Not tested[31]
Kale peptideBrassica alboglabra5907 DaFusarium oxysporum (4.3 μM), Helminthosporium maydis (2.1 μM), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (2.4 μM), Valsa mali (0.15 μM)20–80 °C; pH 2–3, pH 10–11Not tested[32]
CampesinBrassica campestris9.4 kDaFusarium oxysporum (5.1 μM), Mycosphaerella arachidicola (4.4 μM)0–100 °C; pH 0–14Not tested[33]
nsLTPBrassica campestris9414 DaFusarium oxysporum (8.3 μM), Helminthosporium staivum, Mycosphaerella arachidicola (4.5 μM), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Verticivium albotarum20–100 °C; pH 0–4, pH 9–14Not tested[34]
a: Antifungal activity is represented by the half maximal inhibitory concentration.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, S.; Ng, T.; Ye, X. Purification of an Antifungal Peptide from Seeds of Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes and Investigation of Its Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of Action. Molecules 2019, 24, 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071337

AMA Style

Wang C, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Yuan S, Ng T, Ye X. Purification of an Antifungal Peptide from Seeds of Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes and Investigation of Its Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of Action. Molecules. 2019; 24(7):1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Caicheng, Yao Zhang, Weiwei Zhang, Susu Yuan, Tzibun Ng, and Xiujuan Ye. 2019. "Purification of an Antifungal Peptide from Seeds of Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes and Investigation of Its Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of Action" Molecules 24, no. 7: 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071337

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop