Next Article in Journal
Ruthenium(IV) Complexes as Potential Inhibitors of Bacterial Biofilm Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Antiviral Activity of a Series of 2′-C-Methyl-4′-thionucleoside Monophosphate Prodrugs
Previous Article in Journal
Small Molecules Targeting Biological Clock; A Novel Prospective for Anti-Cancer Drugs
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Chemical Probe Targeting Bacterial NAD Kinase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Modifying Thioflavin T at the N3-Position on Its G4 Binding and Fluorescence Emission

1
Graduate School of Integrated Basic Sciences, Nihon University, 3-25-40 Sakurajosui, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8550, Japan
2
Frontier Institute for Biomolecular Engineering Research (FIBER), Konan University, 7-1-20, Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
3
Graduate School of Frontiers of Innovative Research in Science and Technology (FIRST), Konan University, 7-1-20 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(21), 4936; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214936
Submission received: 1 October 2020 / Revised: 21 October 2020 / Accepted: 23 October 2020 / Published: 26 October 2020

Abstract

:
We previously synthesized thioflavin T (ThT) with a hydroxyethyl group introduced at the N3-position (ThT-HE), which binds predominantly to the parallel G-quadruplex (G4) structure found in c-Myc and emits strong fluorescence. In this study, to investigate the effects of introduced substituents on G4 binding and fluorescence emission, a ThT derivative in which the hydroxyl group of ThT-HE was replaced with an amino group (ThT-AE) was synthesized for the first time. Furthermore, three other N3-modified ThT derivatives (ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11) having different substituent structures were synthesized by the N-acylation of the terminal amino group of ThT-AE, and their G4-binding and emission properties were investigated. The results showed that, although ThT-AE shows binding selectivity depending on the type of G4, its emission intensity is significantly decreased as compared to that of ThT-HE. However, ThT-OE11, which features an 11-unit oxyethylene chain attached to the terminal amino group of ThT-AE, regained about one-half of the emission intensity of ThT-HE while retaining selectivity for G4s. Accordingly, ThT-OE11 may be used as a key intermediate for synthesizing the conjugates of G4 binders and probes.

1. Introduction

G-quadruplex structures, known as non-canonical nucleic acid structures, are likely to occur in sequences rich in guanine. G-quadruplex (G4) structures are formed by four Hoogsteen-paired coplanar guanines, which are called a G-quartet, via stacking interactions. G4 structures are stabilized by the coordination of cations such as sodium or potassium ions in the center of the G-quartet. Typical examples of G4 structures are parallel, antiparallel hybrid-1, and hybrid-2 types (Figure 1) [1,2]. These G4 structures are present mainly in the telomere and promoter regions, and it has been confirmed that the induction of the structure stabilizes chromosomes, controls replication on–off, and protects the telomere region from telomerase. In the promoter region, it has been reported that RNA polymerase binding is inhibited by inducing a G4 structure, as transcription itself is inhibited, and transcription progress is halted in the middle, but the actual roles and functional mechanisms of G4 structures remain unclear [3,4]. Therefore, there is significant research effort focused on the creation of G4 binders and probes (antibodies, small molecular ligands, nucleic acid aptamers, etc.) as a means to elucidate the biological significance of G4 structures and develop fluorescent probes and drug candidates for gene expression regulation.
Several ligands and fluorescent probes that stain G4 structures have been reported [5,6,7,8,9]. Among them, thioflavin T (ThT) has attracted significant attention since Mohanty et al. reported that it can bind G4 structures and emit strong fluorescence with low background emission (i.e., the dye does not emit when it is only bound to dsDNA or ssDNA) [10].
The fluorescence intensity of ThT is known to depend greatly on the dihedral angle (φ) between its benzothiazole and dimethylaminobenzen rings [11,12,13] (Figure 2). The ground and excited states of free ThT in solution have φ values of 37° and 90°, respectively, at its lowest potential energy. The excited state of free ThT (φ = 90°) does not emit fluorescence (quantum yield: Φ < 0.001) owing to the radiationless deactivation caused by non-radiative twisted internal charge transfer [14,15]. However, when ThT binds to a target, φ is restricted to 20°–40° in the excited state and fluorescence emission derived from the locally excited state can be observed (Φ = 0.3–0.8) [16]. Therefore, high contrast images with low background fluorescence can be obtained using ThT without removing excess probe molecules.
Since the N3-position of ThT is closest to the C–C single bond, i.e., the axis of rotation between the rings, it is conceivable that the degree of steric hindrance at this position has a large effect on the degree of rotational freedom. Therefore, in a previous study, we focused on the N3-position of ThT and introduced a hydroxyethyl group to develop ThT-HE. We then demonstrated that ThT-HE binds to parallel G4 in particular and exhibits strong fluorescence while maintaining the low background emission properties of ThT [17]. In addition, we reported the application of ThT-HE to G4 detection systems [18,19,20]. Since then, ThT with an ethyl group introduced at the N3-position (ThT-E) has been reported by Guan et al. [21], but the derivatization of ThT at the N3-position has not seen significant progress otherwise.
In this study, we synthesized a new thioflavin T derivative in which the hydroxyl group of ThT-HE was replaced with an amino group (ThT-AE). Furthermore, three types of N3-modified ThT derivatives in which two-unit oxyethylene and spermine chains and an 11-unit oxyethylene chain were introduced by the N-acylation of the terminal amino group were synthesized (Figure 2). By comparing and verifying the binding of these derivatives to G4 and their resultant fluorescence emissions, the effects of the substituents introduced at the N3-position on G4 binding and fluorescence emission was investigated.

2. Results

2.1. Fluorescence Spectral Analysis of ThT, ThT-HE, and ThT-AE

In order to investigate the fluorescence properties of ThT, ThT-HE, and ThT-AE in the presence of various G4s, fluorescence titration analysis was performed and relative fluorescence intensities were calculated (Figure 3, Table S1). In the fluorescence titrations, we used PBS140KM buffer containing 140 mM K+, which simulates intracellular conditions, and PBS153NM buffer containing 153 mM Na+, which simulates extracellular conditions. We analyzed six types of human-derived G4 sequences with various topologies under both buffer conditions. dsDNA was used as a background control as it cannot form G4 structures (Table 1). The name of the G4 sequence was defined by the length of the sequence and its origin, and these topologies were defined by the CD spectra in [17] (Figure S1).
Comparing the relative fluorescence intensities of ThT-HE and ThT-AE with that of ThT, it is clear that, under both Na+ and K+ buffer conditions, ThT-HE and ThT-AE have improved selectivity for parallel G4s such as 27Myc, 22Kit, 20Src, and 18Ras (Figure 3). Furthermore, the fluorescence intensity of ThT-HE with parallel G4 in Na+ buffer is 4.0–170-fold higher than that of dsDNA, but in K+ buffer it is significantly decreased (6.6–53-fold).
Conversely, the relative fluorescence intensities of ThT-AE with parallel G4s are 12–180-fold higher in Na+ buffer and 15–170-fold higher in K+ buffer than those of dsDNA under corresponding conditions. Thus, ThT-AE has the same degree of selectivity for parallel G4 under both conditions. Therefore, the G4 selectivity of ThT-AE in K+ buffer is improved compared to that of ThT-HE under similar conditions.
Furthermore, comparing the fluorescence spectra of ThT-HE and ThT-AE in K+ buffer, the fluorescence intensity of ThT-AE with dsDNA is 75-fold lower than that of ThT-HE, but the fluorescence intensity of ThT-AE with 27Myc is 33-fold lower than that of ThT-HE. Therefore, the selectivity of ThT-AE for G4 is relatively high, but the fluorescence intensity is decreased significantly (Figure 4 and Figure S2).

2.2. Fluorescence Spectral Analysis of ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11

The fluorescence properties of ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11 in the presence of various G4s were investigated using Na+ and K+ buffers. Comparing the relative fluorescence intensities in Na+ and K+ buffers indicates that ThT-OE2 and ThT-SP exhibit poor selectivity for G4 topological structures (Figure 5 and Table S1). Furthermore, the relative fluorescence intensity of ThT-OE11 for parallel G4s is 15–150-fold higher in Na+ buffer and 18–75-fold higher in K+ buffer. These results show that the selectivity of ThT for parallel G4 is maintained when a long linker chain was introduced at the N3-position. Furthermore, the selectivity of ThT-OE11 in K+ buffer for parallel G4 is around 3.1-fold higher than that of ThT-HE, suggesting an improvement in the selectivity of ThT-OE11 for a parallel G4 in K+ buffer.
A comparison of the fluorescence spectra obtained in K+ buffer reveals that the fluorescence intensities of ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11 with 27Myc are 27-, 40-, and 13-fold higher than that of ThT-AE (Figure 6, Figures S3 and S4). Therefore, the fluorescence intensity is restored by introducing substituent groups to ThT-AE by N-acylation of the terminal amino group.
Furthermore, although the fluorescence intensity of ThT-OE11 with 27Myc is 2.6-fold lower than that of ThT-HE, the fluorescence intensity of ThT-OE11 with dsDNA is 3.7-fold lower, indicating that ThT-OE11 has a lower background fluorescence than that of ThT-HE.

2.3. Binding Affinity and UV–Vis Spectral Analysis

The apparent dissociation constants (Kd) of these probes with G4s were determined from the fluorescence titration curves obtained above (Table 2 and Figure S5). The Kd values of ThT-HE, ThT-OE2, and ThT-OE11 for parallel G4s, in particular 27Myc and 18Ras, in both K+ buffer and Na+ buffer, are several μM to several tens of μM, and there is no difference in the values for the different buffers. Furthermore, the binding affinities for dsDNA are low and fluorescence emission is barely observed because the molecules do not bind to dsDNA. ThT-AE has a low binding affinity for dsDNA under both buffer conditions, suggesting that the fluorescence intensity may be low due to the low binding affinity. Conversely, ThT-SP shows high binding affinity not only for the G4 sequence but also for dsDNA, further indicating its high background fluorescence (Figure 6).
Figure 7 shows the UV–Vis spectra of ThT-HE, ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11 with high binding affinities for parallel G4s in K+ buffer. The UV–Vis spectra of ThT-HE, ThT-OE2, and ThT-OE11 (Figure 7A,B,D) are red-shifted by approximately 20 nm due to binding to parallel G4s compared to those of the dye only. Furthermore, the UV–Vis spectra of ThT-SP with the G4s are red-shifted by approximately 30 nm compared to that of ThT-SP alone due to G4 binding, and the spectrum of ThT-SP with dsDNA is also red-shifted by approximately 20 nm due to its binding with dsDNA (Figure 7C). Therefore, the degree of the red shift depends on the degree of change in fluorescence intensity and the binding affinity, suggesting that the probes are stabilized by binding to the target and π-conjugation spread over the ThT framework. These data support the results of fluorescence titration.

3. Discussion

The above results demonstrate that ThT-AE has high selectivity for parallel G4s, but the fluorescence intensity is significantly reduced compared with that of ThT-HE. Conversely, ThT-OE11, in which an 11-unit oxyethylene chain is introduced, exhibits high selectivity for parallel G4s and low background fluorescence while maintaining fluorescence intensity when binding to parallel G4s. This may be because the introduced polyethylene glycol linker stabilizes the structure of G4 [22,23]. Thus, the difference between the background fluorescence intensity and that when bound to G4 is larger for ThT-OE11 than that for ThT-OE2, in which a 2-unit oxyethylene chain is introduced, due to the stabilization of the G4 structure.
Furthermore, the introduction of a spermine moiety (i.e., ThT-SP) [24,25] which binds to DNA or RNA with canonical nucleic acid structures, decreasing G4 selectivity. Therefore, this result shows that the specificity of N3-modified ThT derivatives can be modulated by chemical moieties to be introduced. In other words, it is possible to develop G4-binders with enhanced specificity for 27Myc by conjugating Phen-Pr, MYRA-A, and NSC308838, which are G4 binders that specifically bind to 27Myc and to ThT-OE11 [26,27]. It may also be possible to develop a G4 probe that enables the ratiometric fluorescence detection of parallel G4s by, for example, conjugating carbon quantum dots to ThT-OE11 [28].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Oligonucleotides were purchased from Japan Bio Services Co., Ltd. (Saitama, Japan) and GeneDesign Inc. (Osaka, Japan) (Table 1). These were derived from human genes [29,30,31,32,33]. Specifically, telomeric regions (22AG and 26Tel), the nuclease hypersensitivity element region of the c-Myc P1 promoter (27Myc), 87 nucleotides upstream of the initial transcription site of proto-oncogene encoding for a tyrosine kinase (22Kit), proto-oncogene encoding for a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase (20Src), and the 5′-untranslated region of the human NRAS proto-oncogene transcript (18Ras). dsDNA was used as a reference as in previous works [10,17].
To analyze the effects of the buffer condition on fluorescence emission, two buffer solutions were used: PBS140KM (80 mM HPO42−, 2.5 mM SO42−, 140 mM K+, 10 mM Na+, 2.5 mM Mg2+; pH 7.4), and PBS153NM (10 mM HPO42−, 146 mM Cl, 153 mM Na+, 2.7 mM K+, 2.5 mM Mg2+; pH 7.4). PBS140KM (K+ buffer) is a mimic of intracellular ionic components, and PBS153NM (Na+ buffer) is a typical phosphate saline. All other reagents were of research grade.

4.2. Chemical Syntheses of ThT Derivatives

The synthesis of ThT-HE is described in [17] and those of ThT-AE and ThT-OE11 are described in [18]. The syntheses of ThT-OE2 and ThT-SP are described in the supplementary materials.

4.3. Fluorescence Spectral Analysis

Oligonucleotides were dissolved in PBS140KM or PBS153NM at 21 μM (a 42 μM mixture of two ssDNAs at a ratio of 1:1 was used as a dsDNA) and refolded by denaturing at 95 °C (or at 40 °C for 18 Ras) for 0.5 min followed by cooling to 25 °C at a rate of 0.5 °C/min using a thermal cycler (WK-0518, Osaka, Japan). These solutions were diluted to appropriate oligonucleotide concentrations, and aliquots (50 μL each) were incubated at 25 °C for 30 min and then mixed with 20 μL solutions of the dye under investigation (ThT, ThT-HE, ThT-AE, ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, or ThT-OE11; 10.5 μM) in PBS140KM or PBS153NM. These mixtures were incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. Emission spectra were obtained by excitation at 415 nm and monitoring fluorescence between 450 and 600 nm (Figure 4 and Figure 6, Figures S2–S4). The fluorescence intensity of the dye (ThT, ThT-HE, ThT-AE, ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, or ThT-OE11; 3 μM) mixed with dsDNA (15 μM) in each buffer solution (defined as I0), which generally yielded the minimum fluorescence enhancement and can be defined as background fluorescence, was set to 1. Then, the relative fluorescence intensities of the corresponding dyes in the respective buffer solutions (I/I0) were determined (Figure 3 and Figure 5, Table S1). The Kd values were determined from the titration curves in Figure S5 and are listed in Table 2.

5. Conclusions

We succeeded in synthesizing ThT-OE11, which exhibited low background fluorescence and high fluorescence emission intensity and selectivity for parallel G4s, for the first time.
In the future, we hope that ThT-OE11 will be used as an important intermediate in the development of better G4 probes as well as G4 binders, which can be applied as gene expression regulators.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1. CD spectra for 22AG, 26Tel, 27Myc, 22Kit, 20Src, and 18Ras, Figure S2: Fluorescence spectra of ThT-HE and ThT-AE in PBS140KM, Figure S3: Fluorescence spectra of ThT-OE11 in PBS140KM with 22AG, 26Tel, 22Kit, 20Src and 18Ras, Figure S4: Fluorescence spectra of ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11 in PBS140KM, Figure S5: Fluorescence titration curves of ThT, ThT-HE, ThT-AE, ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11, Table S1: Fluorescence intensities of ThT, ThT-HE, ThT-AE, ThT-OE2, ThT-SP and ThT-OE11, Scheme S1: Synthetic routes for N3-modified thioflavin T derivatives (ThT-OE2 and ThT-SP).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; methodology, M.K.; validation, H.F. and Y.K.; formal analysis, H.F. and Y.K.; investigation, H.F. and Y.K.; data curation, H.F. and Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.F. and Y.K.; writing—review and editing, H.F., Y.K, T.E., N.S. and M.K.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by a Grant for Translational Research Program (H355TS) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, especially that for Scientific Research (C) 18K05347 and that on Innovative Areas “Chemistry for Multimolecular Crowding Biosystems” JP17H06351 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Nihon University Multidisciplinary Research Grant for 2020, and The Hirao Taro Foundation of KONAN GAKUEN for Academic Research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, L.; Shao, Y.; Peng, J.; Huang, C.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L. Molecular Rotor-Based Fluorescent Probe for Selective Recognition of Hybrid G-Quadruplex and as a K+ Sensor. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1622–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yaku, H.; Fujimoto, T.; Murashima, T.; Miyoshi, D.; Sugimoto, N. Phthalocyanines: A new class of G-quadruplex-ligands with many potential applications. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6203–6216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Endoh, T.; Sugimoto, N. Conformational Dynamics of the RNA G-Quadruplex and its Effect on Translation Efficiency. Molecules 2019, 24, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rhodes, D.; Lipps, H.J. G-quadruplexes and their regulatory roles in biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 8627–8637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Dhamodharan, V.; Pradeepkumar, P.I. Specific Recognition of Promoter G-Quadruplex DNAs by Small Molecule Ligands and Light-up Probes. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019, 14, 2102–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ruggiero, E.; Richter, S.N. G-quadruplexes and G-quadruplex ligands: Targets and tools in antiviral therapy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 3270–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rosenberg, J.E.; Bambury, R.M.; Van Allen, E.M.; Drabkin, H.A.; Lara, P.N., Jr.; Harzstark, A.L.; Wagle, N.; Figlin, R.A.; Smith, G.W.; Garraway, L.A.; et al. A phase II trial of AS1411 (a novel nucleolin-targeted DNA aptamer) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Investig. New Drugs 2014, 32, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Biffi, G.; Tannahill, D.; McCafferty, J.; Balasubramanian, S. Quantitative visualization of DNA G-quadruplex structures in human cells. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vummidi, B.R.; Alzeer, J.; Luedtke, N.W. Fluorescent Probes for G-Quadruplex Structures. Chem. Biol. Chem. 2013, 14, 540–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohanty, J.; Barooah, N.; Dhamodharan, V.; Harikrishna, S.; Pradeepkumar, P.I.; Bhasikuttan, A.C. Thioflavin T as an Efficient Inducer and Selective Fluorescent Sensor for the Human Telomeric G-Quadruplex DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Freire, S.; de Araujo, M.H.; Al-Soufi, W.; Novo, M. Photophysical study of Thioflavin T as fluorescence marker of amyloid fibrils. Dyes Pigments 2014, 110, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sulatskaya, A.I.; Maskevich, A.A.; Kuznetsova, I.M.; Uversky, V.N.; Turoverov, K.K. Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Thioflavin T in Rigid Isotropic Solution and Incorporated into the Amyloid Fibrils. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Stsiapura, V.I.; Maskevich, A.A.; Tikhomirov, S.A.; Buganov, O.V. Charge Transfer Process Determines Ultrafast Excited State Deactivation of Thioflavin T in Low-Viscosity Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 8345–8350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Amdursky, N.; Erez, Y.; Huppert, D. Molecular Rotors: What Lies Behind the High Sensitivity of the Thioflavin-T Fluorescent Marker. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1548–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stsiapura, V.I.; Maskevich, A.A.; Kuzmitsky, V.A.; Turoverov, K.K.; Kuznetsova, I.M. Computational Study of Thioflavin T Torsional Relaxation in the Excited State. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 4829–4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sulatskaya, A.I.; Rychkov, G.N.; Sulatsky, M.I.; Rodina, N.P.; Kuznetsova, I.M.; Turoverov, K.K. Thioflavin T Interaction with Acetylcholinesterase: New Evidence of 1:1 Binding Stoichiometry Obtained with Samples Prepared by Equilibrium Microdialysis. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 1793–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kataoka, Y.; Fujita, H.; Kasahara, Y.; Yoshihara, T.; Tobita, S.; Kuwahara, M. Minimal Thioflavin T Modifications Improve Visual Discrimination of Guanine-Quadruplex Topologies and Alter Compound-Induced Topological Structures. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 12078–12084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kataoka, Y.; Fujita, H.; Afanaseva, A.; Nagao, C.; Mizuguchi, K.; Kasahara, Y.; Obika, S.; Kuwahara, M. High-Contrast Facile Imaging with Target-Directing Fluorescent Molecular Rotors, the N 3-Modified Thioflavin T Derivatives. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fujita, H.; Kataoka, Y.; Nagano, R.; Nakajima, Y.; Yamada, M.; Sugimoto, N.; Kuwahara, M. Specific Light-Up System for Protein and Metabolite Targets Triggered by Initiation Complex Formation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fujita, H.; Kataoka, Y.; Tobita, S.; Kuwahara, M.; Sugimoto, N. Novel One-Tube-One-Step Real-Time Methodology for Rapid Transcriptomic Biomarker Detection: Signal Amplification by Ternary Initiation Complexes. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 7137–7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guan, A.J.; Zhang, X.F.; Sun, X.; Li, Q.; Xiang, J.F.; Wang, L.X.; Lan, L.; Yang, F.M.; Xu, S.J.; Guo, X.M.; et al. Ethyl-substitutive Thioflavin T as a highly-specific fluorescence probe for detecting G-quadruplex structure. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yum, J.H.; Park, S.; Sugiyama, H. G-quadruplexes as versatile scaffolds for catalysis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 9547–9561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zheng, K.W.; Chen, Z.; Hao, Y.H.; Tan, Z. Molecular crowding creates an essential environment for the formation of stable G-quadruplexes in long double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kang, H.; Yoo, J.; Sohn, B.K.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, H.S.; Ma, W.; Kee, J.M.; Aksimentiev, A.; Kim, H. Sequence-dependent DNA condensation as a driving force of DNA phase separation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 9401–9413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Geall, A.J.; Taylor, R.J.; Earll, M.E.; Eaton, M.A.; Blagbrough, I.S. Synthesis of Cholesteryl Polyamine Carbamates:  pKa Studies and Condensation of Calf Thymus DNA. Bioconjug. Chem. 2000, 11, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, B.J.; Wu, Y.L.; Tanaka, Y.; Zhang, W. Small Molecules Targeting c-Myc Oncogene: Promising Anti-Cancer Therapeutics. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 10, 1084–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dhamodharan, V.; Harikrishna, S.; Bhasikuttan, A.C.; Pradeepkumar, P.I. Topology Specific Stabilization of Promoter over Telomeric G-Quadruplex DNAs by Bisbenzimidazole Carboxamide Derivatives. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jin, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Bing, T.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Shangguan, D. Thiazole Orange-Modified Carbon Dots for Ratiometric Fluorescence Detection of G-Quadruplex and Double-Stranded DNA. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 25166–25173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rodriguez, R.; Miller, K.M.; Forment, J.V.; Bradshaw, C.R.; Nikan, M.; Britton, S.; Oelschlaegel, T.; Xhemalce, B.; Balasubramanian, S.; Jackson, S.P. Small-molecule-induced DNA damage identifies alternative DNA structures in human genes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kang, H.J.; Park, H.J. Novel Molecular Mechanism for Actinomycin D Activity as an Oncogenic Promoter G-Quadruplex Binder. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 7392–7398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Phan, A.T.; Kuryavyi, V.; Burge, S.; Neidle, S.; Patel, D.J. Structure of an Unprecedented G-Quadruplex Scaffold in the Human c-kit Promoter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4386–4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kumari, S.; Bugaut, A.; Huppert, J.L.; Balasubramanian, S. An RNA G-quadruplex in the 5′ UTR of the NRAS proto-oncogene modulates translation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Dai, J.; Carver, M.; Punchihewa, C.; Jones, R.A.; Yang, D. Structure of the Hybrid-2 type intramolecular human telomeric G-quadruplex in K+ solution: Insights into structure polymorphism of the human telomeric sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 4927–4940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of a G-quartet (M+ indicates a monovalent cation) and (B) illustration of typical G4 structures.
Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of a G-quartet (M+ indicates a monovalent cation) and (B) illustration of typical G4 structures.
Molecules 25 04936 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of ThT, ThT-HE, ThT-AE, ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of ThT, ThT-HE, ThT-AE, ThT-OE2, ThT-SP, and ThT-OE11.
Molecules 25 04936 g002
Figure 3. Relative fluorescence intensities (I/I0) of (A) ThT, (B) ThT-HE, and (C) ThT-AE with each oligonucleotide in PBS140KM (green) and PBS153NM (blue). Here, I/I0 is the ratio of the intensities of the fluorescence emitted upon the binding of the dye (3 μM) to the oligonucleotide (15 μM) and dsDNA (15 μM; duplex concentration), respectively, in the same buffer. All samples were excited at 415 nm and the emissions were monitored at 485 nm.
Figure 3. Relative fluorescence intensities (I/I0) of (A) ThT, (B) ThT-HE, and (C) ThT-AE with each oligonucleotide in PBS140KM (green) and PBS153NM (blue). Here, I/I0 is the ratio of the intensities of the fluorescence emitted upon the binding of the dye (3 μM) to the oligonucleotide (15 μM) and dsDNA (15 μM; duplex concentration), respectively, in the same buffer. All samples were excited at 415 nm and the emissions were monitored at 485 nm.
Molecules 25 04936 g003
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of (A) ThT-HE and (B) ThT-AE (3 μM) in PBS140KM with increasing concentrations of 27Myc (left side) and dsDNA (right side) (0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 μM). Oligonucleotide concentration: 0 μM (purple), 1 μM (navy blue), 3 μM (blue), 6 μM (light blue), 9 μM (green), 12 μM (yellow), and 15 μM (red).
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of (A) ThT-HE and (B) ThT-AE (3 μM) in PBS140KM with increasing concentrations of 27Myc (left side) and dsDNA (right side) (0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 μM). Oligonucleotide concentration: 0 μM (purple), 1 μM (navy blue), 3 μM (blue), 6 μM (light blue), 9 μM (green), 12 μM (yellow), and 15 μM (red).
Molecules 25 04936 g004
Figure 5. Relative fluorescence intensities (I/I0) for (A) ThT-OE2, (B) ThT-SP, and (C) ThT-OE11 with each oligonucleotide in PBS140KM (green) and PBS153NM (blue). Here, I/I0 is the ratio of the fluorescence intensities emitted upon the binding of the dye (3 μM) to the oligonucleotide (15 μM) and dsDNA (15 μM; duplex concentration), respectively, in the same buffer. All samples were excited at 415 nm and the emissions were monitored at 485 nm.
Figure 5. Relative fluorescence intensities (I/I0) for (A) ThT-OE2, (B) ThT-SP, and (C) ThT-OE11 with each oligonucleotide in PBS140KM (green) and PBS153NM (blue). Here, I/I0 is the ratio of the fluorescence intensities emitted upon the binding of the dye (3 μM) to the oligonucleotide (15 μM) and dsDNA (15 μM; duplex concentration), respectively, in the same buffer. All samples were excited at 415 nm and the emissions were monitored at 485 nm.
Molecules 25 04936 g005
Figure 6. Fluorescence spectra of (A) ThT-OE2, (B) ThT-SP, and (C) ThT-OE11 (3 μM) in PBS140KM with increasing concentrations of 27Myc (left side) and dsDNA (right side) (0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 μM). Oligonucleotide concentration: 0 μM (purple), 1 μM (navy blue), 3 μM (blue), 6 μM (light blue), 9 μM (green), 12 μM (yellow), and 15 μM (red).
Figure 6. Fluorescence spectra of (A) ThT-OE2, (B) ThT-SP, and (C) ThT-OE11 (3 μM) in PBS140KM with increasing concentrations of 27Myc (left side) and dsDNA (right side) (0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 μM). Oligonucleotide concentration: 0 μM (purple), 1 μM (navy blue), 3 μM (blue), 6 μM (light blue), 9 μM (green), 12 μM (yellow), and 15 μM (red).
Molecules 25 04936 g006
Figure 7. UV-Vis absorption spectra of (A) ThT-HE, (B) ThT-OE2, (C) ThT-SP, and (D) ThT-OE11 (3 μM) with or without oligonucleotides (15 μM) in PBS140KM. Oligonucleotides: 22AG (purple), 26Tel (blue), 27Myc (yellow green), 22Kit (light blue), 20Src (pink), 18Ras (yellow), dsDNA (black), and dye only (red).
Figure 7. UV-Vis absorption spectra of (A) ThT-HE, (B) ThT-OE2, (C) ThT-SP, and (D) ThT-OE11 (3 μM) with or without oligonucleotides (15 μM) in PBS140KM. Oligonucleotides: 22AG (purple), 26Tel (blue), 27Myc (yellow green), 22Kit (light blue), 20Src (pink), 18Ras (yellow), dsDNA (black), and dye only (red).
Molecules 25 04936 g007
Table 1. Synthetic oligonucleotides used in this study.
Table 1. Synthetic oligonucleotides used in this study.
OligonucleotideSequenceConformation
Na+K+
22AG5’-AGG GTT AGG GTT AGG GTT AGG G-3’AntiparallelHybrid-1
26Tel5’-TTA GGG TTA GGG TTA GGG TTA GGG TT-3’AntiparallelHybrid-2
27Myc5’-TGG GGA GGG TGG GGA GGG TGG GGA AGG-3’ParallelParallel
22Kit5’-AGG GAG GGC GCT GGG AGG AGG G-3’ParallelParallel
20Src5’-GGG CGG CGG GCT GGG CGG GG-3’ParallelParallel
18Ras5’-GGG AGG GGC GGG UCU GGG-3’ParallelParallel
dsDNA5’-GGG TTA CTA CGA ACT GG-3’DuplexDuplex
3’-CCC AAT GAT GCT TGA CC-5’
Table 2. Binding affinities of ThT and its analogs for the target oligonucleotides.
Table 2. Binding affinities of ThT and its analogs for the target oligonucleotides.
DyeBufferKd (μM) a
Oligonucleotide
22AG26Tel27Myc22Kit20Src18RasdsDNA
ThTPBS140KM5.0 ± 0.54.0 ± 0.46.9 ± 0.89.9 ± 1.2n.d.19.0 ± 2.9n.d.
PBS153NMn.d.29.5 ± 5.613.5 ± 5.14.8 ± 0.8n.d.15.3 ± 1.6n.d.
ThT-HEPBS140KM20.1 ± 1.511.1 ± 1.519.9 ± 0.934.9 ± 6.6n.d.25.0 ± 3.1n.d.
PBS153NMn.d.n.d.14.1 ± 1.512.3 ± 1.8n.d.28.1 ± 4.0n.d.
ThT-AEPBS140KMn.d.9.7 ± 5.5n.d.8.9 ± 3.5n.d.n.d.n.d.
PBS153NM23.6 ± 9.1n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
ThT-OE2PBS140KM11.8 ± 1.45.3 ± 0.48.7 ± 0.720.5 ± 1.438.6 ± 5.911.8 ± 0.6n.d.
PBS153NMn.d.34.3 ± 4.010.8 ± 1.3n.d.n.d.15.5 ± 1.7n.d.
ThT-SPPBS140KM5.4 ± 1.02.4 ± 0.46.8 ± 0.96.8 ± 0.618.8 ± 2.412.8 ± 1.916.0 ± 1.0
PBS153NM8.2 ± 0.84.6 ± 0.35.3 ± 0.87.4 ± 3.94.1 ± 0.514.7 ± 3.29.4 ± 1.0
ThT-OE11PBS140KMn.d.23.9 ± 3.113.4 ± 0.836.6 ± 4.420.2 ± 2.315.3 ± 1.9n.d.
PBS153NM20.3 ± 9.9n.d.29.1 ± 2.5n.d.n.d.16.3 ± 1.8n.d.
a Apparent Kd values were determined by fluorescence titration. Examples of titration curves are shown in Figure S5. Here, n.d. denotes that accurate values could not be determined under the experimental conditions; apparent Kd values were assumed to be >40 μM.
Sample Availability: MSamples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kataoka, Y.; Fujita, H.; Endoh, T.; Sugimoto, N.; Kuwahara, M. Effects of Modifying Thioflavin T at the N3-Position on Its G4 Binding and Fluorescence Emission. Molecules 2020, 25, 4936. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214936

AMA Style

Kataoka Y, Fujita H, Endoh T, Sugimoto N, Kuwahara M. Effects of Modifying Thioflavin T at the N3-Position on Its G4 Binding and Fluorescence Emission. Molecules. 2020; 25(21):4936. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kataoka, Yuka, Hiroto Fujita, Tamaki Endoh, Naoki Sugimoto, and Masayasu Kuwahara. 2020. "Effects of Modifying Thioflavin T at the N3-Position on Its G4 Binding and Fluorescence Emission" Molecules 25, no. 21: 4936. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214936

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop