Next Article in Journal
Isolation of Garlic Bioactives by Pressurized Liquid and Subcritical Water Extraction
Next Article in Special Issue
A DFT Study of Alkaline Earth Metal-Doped FAPbI3 (111) and (100) Surfaces
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Sodium Alginate-Carnauba Wax Film Containing Calcium Ascorbate: Structural Properties and Preservative Effect on Fresh-Cut Apples
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gaseous- and Condensed-Phase Activities of Some Reactive P- and N-Containing Fire Retardants in Polystyrenes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules28010368
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spectrally Selective Full-Color Single-Component Organic Photodetectors Based on Donor-Acceptor Conjugated Molecules

by
Artur L. Mannanov
1,
Dmitry O. Balakirev
1,
Elizaveta D. Papkovskaya
1,
Alexander N. Solodukhin
1,
Yuriy N. Luponosov
1,
Dmitry Yu. Paraschuk
1,2,* and
Sergey A. Ponomarenko
1,*
1
Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya St. 70, 117393 Moscow, Russia
2
Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(1), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010368
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 27 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 2 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Materials Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photodetectors based on organic materials are attractive due to their tunable spectral response and biocompatibility, meaning that they are a promising platform for an artificial human eye. To mimic the photoelectric response of the human eye, narrowband spectrally-selective organic photodetectors are in great demand, and single-component organic photodetectors based on donor-acceptor conjugated molecules are a noteworthy candidate. In this work, we present single-component selective full-color organic photodetectors based on donor-acceptor conjugated molecules synthetized to mimic the spectral response of the cones and rods of a human eye. The photodetectors demonstrated a high responsivity (up to 70 mA/W) with a response time of less than 1 µs, which is three orders of magnitude faster than that of human eye photoreceptors. Our results demonstrate the possibility of the creation of an artificial eye or photoactive eye “prostheses”.

1. Introduction

Organic photodetectors have many advantages over conventional inorganic ones, as follows: they can be made from a wide choice of materials, they can be light, thin, flexible, or semitransparent, are easy to manufacture and compatible with printing technologies, and they are biocompatible [1,2,3,4]. The latter is especially important for the possibility of prosthetics of human visual organs [5,6]. An organic photodetector and a solar cell are, per se, the same device used in different operating modes. The most efficient organic solar cells are based on a phase-separated blend of donor and acceptor materials, the optical absorption spectra of which differ and complement each other for the greatest overlap with the solar spectrum [7,8,9]. This circumstance probably explains the greater number of publications devoted to broadband organic photodetectors compared to narrowband ones [10,11]. The disadvantage of broadband photodetectors is the difficulty of color discrimination. As a result, one has to use appropriate color filters to eliminate unwanted sensitivity. The use of color filters complicates the design of the device, and also reduces the photodetector responsivity because of absorption of a part of the incident light [12,13]. Therefore, the development of narrowband photodetectors is of increased interest.
For the implementation of a filter-free narrowband photodetector, various approaches are distinguished, as follows: the development of new narrowband absorbers (both donor and acceptor), the use of nearly transparent donor or acceptor materials, and modification of the architecture of the device to optimize its spectral response [14]. Following the first path, a single donor-acceptor material with a narrow absorption spectrum and effective charge photogeneration seems to be feasible. Recently, much attention has been paid to single-component solar cells based on donor-acceptor materials [15,16]. At the same time, single-component organic photodetectors have far less studied, as follows from articles [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Single-component organic photodetectors benefit primarily from their simplicity, which is especially important for biological applications. It is also worth noting that single-component photodetectors are more stable compared to photodetectors based on donor-acceptor blends, since the morphology of the latter may change during the device operation due to thermodynamic instability [25].
Conjugated polymers and small molecules are used as materials for single-component photodetectors. The latter combine the advantages of a well-defined chemical structure, ease of purification, and reproducibility, which provides almost identical characteristics of the devices from batch to batch, as compared with the polymers [26]. The donor-acceptor concept in the molecular design of the π-conjugated system opens wide possibilities for tuning their key properties, such as absorption spectra, charge-carrier mobilities, charge photogeneration efficiency, and stability [26,27]. Changing the donor or/and acceptor group, as well as the type and the length of the conjugated π-spacer between them, allows for adjusting the frontier orbitals energies, absorption and luminescence spectra, phase behavior, photophysics, and charge separation [23,24,28]. Various donor-acceptor conjugated molecules of a linear and star-shaped structure were synthesized, and their physicochemical and photovoltaic properties were investigated [23,24,28,29,30]. If the molecular absorption spectra are close to the photosensitive response of eye photoreceptors (blue cones, rods, green cones, red cones), they can be used to create full-color retinal prostheses [6].
In this work, oriented on a natural optical device—the human eye—we found several small π-conjugated donor-acceptor molecules with different optical properties, aiming to reproduce as accurately as possible the absorption spectra of rods and cones of the human eye retina (Figure 1). Prototypes of single-component organic photodetectors based on the most promising materials were fabricated and characterized. Full-color spectrally-selective single-component organic photodetectors that completely mimic human vision are presented for the first time.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of the Materials

Figure 2 shows the chemical structures of the molecules investigated. These materials were chosen because the maxima of their absorption spectra in thin films correspond well to the maxima of the sensitivity of the human eye photoreceptors (Figure 1). Synthesis and investigation of the properties of molecules II and IV were described previously [32,33,34]. Synthesis and characterization of I and III are described below (Scheme 1).
The novel TPA-based star-shaped molecules I and III were prepared similar to the previously developed synthetic approach based on preparation of the star-shaped triketones or trialdehydes followed by a Knövenagel condensation [35].
Synthesis of I was carried out via Knövenagel condensation reaction of compound 1 and excess of 2-(1-oxopropoxy)acetonitrile in pyridine (Scheme 1a) to give I in 72 % yield. The detailed synthetic procedures and characterization data can be found in the Supporting Information.
Synthesis of III consisted of three consecutive reaction stages. First, the preparation of ketone precursor 3 by the acylation reaction of 4-bromo-7-(2-thienyl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole 2 and heptanoyl chloride using tin tetrachloride as a catalyst in 82 % yield was carried out. The second stage included the synthesis of the star-shaped compound 5, which was prepared through a Suzuki cross-coupling reaction between 4,4′,4″-tris(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)triphenylamine 4 and ketone precursor 3 in 65 % yield. Finally, III was obtained by Knövenagel condensation of compound 5 with the excess of malononitrile in pyridine using a microwave heating to give the product in 53% yield.
Here, 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and MALDI-TOF were used to characterize the molecular structure and purity of these molecules (see Supporting Information, Figures S1–S10). All target molecules were readily soluble in common organic solvents, such as THF, chloroform, dichloromethane, etc.

2.2. Optical Properties of the Materials

Figure 3 shows the normalized absorption spectra of compounds I–IV in thin films (normalized absorption spectra in THF solution are presented in the Supporting Information, Figure S11). The spectra of all compounds in thin films show good overlap with those of eye photoreceptors, as the differences in spectral maxima positions do not exceed 10 nm (25 nm for blue cones). At the same time, it is worth noting that the positions of the sensitivity maxima of rods and cones of different people vary within ±10 nm [36].

2.3. Charge Transport

Since the photoactive layer of spectrally-selective photodetectors usually consists of just one donor-acceptor material, its hole and electron mobilities should be large enough and comparable to ensure fast, effective, and balanced charge transport of the photogenerated charges to the device electrodes. The high and close values of the hole and electron mobilities should be beneficial for photodetectors to avoid space charge effects and increase the operation speed. The hole and electron mobilities in films of molecules I–IV was measured by the space charge limited current (SCLC) technique (for details see the Materials and Methods section), and are presented in Table 1 (J-V characteristics of the hole and electron only devices are presented in Figures S12–S19). Materials I–IV demonstrated a sufficiently balanced charge transport, and the charge mobility values are able to provide a response time for photodetectors with the photoactive layer thickness of ~50 nm in the sub-microsecond range.

2.4. Responsivity Spectra

Single-component photodetectors based on the donor-acceptor materials studied were fabricated (experimental details are described in the Materials and Methods section), and their main characteristics [1,2,11] were measured (the measurement details are described in the Materials and Methods section), such as the responsivity (R) spectra, response speed, dark current, and specific detectivity. The corresponding J-V curves, photovoltaic parameters, and external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra were also measured and presented in the Figures S20 and S21, Supporting Information (Tables S1 and S2).
Since the intrinsic charge photogeneration in material IV is not very efficient, a small amount of an acceptor (PC71BM, no more than 10%) was added to it. In this case, there is a significant improvement in the device characteristics (maximum R and EQE) with virtually no change in the shape of the R and EQE spectra. The measured and normalized R spectra are presented in Figure 4, and the spectral sensitivity maxima are summarized in Table 2.
All responsivity spectra of the photodetectors (with the exception of the blue ones) show a slight redshift for the peak wavelengths compared to the absorption spectra of the same films (Figure 3), which is most likely due to the effects of optical resonator in the device. Nevertheless, the responsivity spectra correspond well to the spectral response of human cones and rods (Figure 1). All the photodetectors demonstrated a difference in peak wavelength within 25 nm as compared to the photoresponse spectra of cones and rods. At the same time, it is worth noting that positions of the sensitivity maxima of rods and cones of different people vary within ±10 nm [36]. This means that an exact match between the photodetectors photoresponse and the absorption of human cones and rods may not be necessary. The green and red photodetectors showed the highest responsivity values, while the blue photodetectors showed a lower responsivity as compared to the others. Such characteristics of photodetectors fabricated somewhat resemble the behavior of human photoreceptors, where the highest response is observed for green cones, and for blue cones it is lower.

2.5. Time-Resolved Response

Figure 5 shows the time-resolved response of the photodetectors to a rectangular optical pulse (the measurement details are described in the Materials and Methods section). The rise-times of the photodetector responses are summarized in Table 2, as follows: they are shorter than 1 µs, which is three orders of magnitude faster than the response time of human eye photoreceptors. The main factors that have a decisive influence on the rise-time are the following: the charge mobility values, exciton dynamics, charge generation rate, applied voltage, and RC time constant [37]. The exciton lifetime in a film of II is significantly lower than 1 ns [24]. Therefore, the delayed charge generation at a sub-microsecond time scale is unlikely to have a significant impact on the response time. The RC time constant is also in the nanosecond time range (see the Materials and Methods section) and should have no effect on the response time. We believe that the main factor determining the response time is the charge carrier mobility. Indeed, the time (τ) of flight of a charge carrier through the thickness (d) of the active layer is estimated as τ = d/(µF), where F is the internal electric field. As a result, the time of flight is in the sub-microsecond range (0.15–0.3 µs).

2.6. Photodetectors Specific Detectivity

Table 3 presents the results on the dark current density (Jdark) and specific detectivity (D*) of reverse biased photodetectors. The specific detectivity values in the generally accepted assumption of the dominance of shot noise under reverse bias conditions [38,39] were calculated using the following Equation (1):
D * = R 2 q J dark
Relatively large dark currents of 50–1200 nA/cm2 are a consequence of a small thickness of the photoactive layer. As a result, the specific detectivity values were reduced because of the large dark currents. The thickness of the single-component photodetectors (see the Materials and Methods section) is optimal in terms of the highest R and EQE values. The thickness of the photoactive layer is limited by the relatively low values of the charge carrier mobility (Table 1) of the organic semiconductor materials used. Therefore, a popular approach is to reduce the dark current by increasing the photoactive layer thickness to achieve a higher shunt resistance, although this faces a trade-off between high values of EQE, R, response speed, D*, and low Jdark values. Although the specific detectivity values turned out to be small, they are not inferior, and sometimes even superior to those for other recently published single-component photodetectors [17,18,19,20].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Photodetectors Fabrication and Characterization

The structure of the photodetectors with normal architecture was ITO/PEDOT:PSS/photoactive layer/Ca/Al. The samples of photodetectors were prepared in the following way. First, glass substrates coated with a patterned indium-tin oxide (ITO) layer (Xin Yan Technology Limited, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, China) were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath with a surfactant and then exposed to an ultraviolet lamp (Photo Surface Processor PL16-110, 15 mW/cm2 isopropanol (Bandelin sonorex digitec, BANDELIN electronic GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany), and were, 254 nm) (Sen Lights Corporation, Osaka, Japan). Then a 50 nm-thick layer of poly(ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS, CLEVIOS P VP AI 4083, Heraeus GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany) was deposited on the ITO by spin-coating at 3000 rpm and annealing at 140 °C for 15 min. The photoactive layer was deposited on the PEDOT:PSS layer by doctor blading from chloroform solution with a concentration of 10 g/L (substrate temperature 50 °C, blade speed 15 mm/s); the resulting thickness was 50 ± 5 nm. On top of the photoactive layer, a Ca (20 nm)/Al (80 nm) electrode was evaporated under pressure less than 5·10−6 mbar with the use of a vacuum evaporator (Univex 300, Leybold, Köln, Germany) integrated in a glove box with an Ar atmosphere (H2O < 0.1 ppm, O2 < 5 ppm). Eight devices with the active area of each device being 3 mm2 were formed on substrates by using a shadow mask.
Inverted architecture of photodetectors was chosen for response time measurements due to the higher current. The structure of the photodetectors with inverted architecture was ITO/ZnO/photoactive layer/MoO3/Ag. The samples of inverted photodetectors were prepared similar to normal photodetectors. The ZnO layer was deposited on the ITO layer in the following way. A total of 100 mg of zinc acetate dihydrate (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was dissolved in a mixture of 1 mL of 2-methoxyethanol (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and 27 µL of monoethanolamine (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Then, this solution was bladed on the ITO layer and annealed at 140 °C for 25 min, resulting in a 40 nm ZnO layer. The MoO3 (10 nm)/Ag (100 nm) electrode was deposited on the photoactive layer with the use of a vacuum evaporator (Univex 300, Leybold, Köln, Germany). Eight devices with inverted architecture and a 3 mm2 active area for each device were formed on substrates by using a shadow mask.
The J-V characteristics of photodetectors were measured using a source-meter (SourceMeter 2400, Keithley, Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA). Responsivity (R) and external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra were measured with the use of a laser-driven light source (LDLS EQ-99X, Energetiq Technology, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) equipped with a monochromator (CS130-USB-3-MC, Newport, Irvine, CA, USA), a power sensor (S120UV, Thorlabs, New Jersey, NJ, USA), and a source-meter (SourceMeter 2400, Keithley, Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA). To avoid higher diffraction orders, additional filters KG3, GG400, and OG550 (Newport, Irvine, CA, USA) were used for the 380–500, 480–620 and 600–800 nm spectral ranges, respectively. All the measurements were performed in a glove box with Ar atmosphere (H2O < 0.1 ppm, O2 < 5 ppm).

3.2. ChargeCarrier Mobility Measurements

Charge carrier mobility was determined using space charge limited current (SCLC) measurements on unipolar thin-film devices of several thicknesses. The structure of the hole-only devices was ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layer/MoO3/Ag. The structure of the electron-only devices was ITO/ZnO/active layer/Ca. Unipolar devices were made similarly to photodetectors. The hole and electron mobilities were extracted by fitting the current-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the corresponding devices with the simplest SCLC model. According to the SCLC model, and taking into account the series (Rs) and shunt (Rsh) resistances (as fitting parameters), the charge mobility was calculated by approximating the dark J-V curves of unipolar devices using the following Equation (2):
J = 9 8 ε ε 0 μ ( V − V BI − J S R s ) 2 d 3 + V − J S R s R sh
where ε0 = 8.85·10−12 F/m, ε is the dielectric permittivity (taken as 3), d is the active layer thickness (measured by AFM), and VBI is the built-in voltage (fitting parameter).

3.3. Time-Resolved Response of Photodetectors

Rise-time measurements were performed using a green laser diode (505 nm, for photodetectors based on I–III) (Sharp GH05130C2GL, Osaka, Japan) and blue laser diode (450 nm, for photodetectors based on IV) (Sharp GH04C01A2G, Osaka, Japan) controlled by a laser driver (LDP-V 03-100 V4.0, PicoLAS, Würselen, Germany) equipped with a pulse generator (PLCS-21, PicoLAS, Würselen, Germany). Rectangular optical pulses (rise-time less than 1.2 ns) with a pulse length of 10 µs and repetition rate of 1 kHz illuminated the active area of the photodetector (without voltage bias) with an average incident power of 110 µW (green laser) and 700 µW (blue laser). The photodetector was connected to a Tektronix TDS 1012B oscilloscope with a 50 Ω resistor connected in parallel. The transients were obtained via an OpenChoice program by Tektronix. The rise-time was taken as the time during which the electrical response of the device rose from 10% to 90%. The corresponding RC-time constant of the electronics was 2–20 ns, and did not impact on the measured rise-time.

4. Conclusions

Donor-acceptor conjugated molecules with the absorption spectra similar to that of the human eye photoreceptors for single-component organic photodetectors were synthesized. Organic single-component selective full-color photodetectors based on synthesized molecules, mimicking the human eye, were reported for the first time. These photodetectors demonstrated a sufficiently high responsivity at the level of 3–70 mA/W, comparable to the responsivity of the human eye receptors. The spectral selectivity of photodetectors is comparable to that of the corresponding cones and rods of the human eye. The photodetector response time (<1 µs) is one of the fastest among organic photodetectors, as it is three orders of magnitude faster than the response time of a human eye. The results obtained pave the way to creating an artificial eye—a matrix of organic photodetectors with different spectral sensitivities, or photoactive “prostheses” for an eye devoid of sensitivity to light because of diseases. We expect that our results will stimulate the development of new conjugated donor-acceptor molecules and facilitate further progress in organic single-component selective photodetectors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28010368/s1. Figure S1. 1H NMR spectrum of target material I, Figure S2. 13C NMR spectrum of target material I, Figure S3. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3, Figure S4. 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3, Figure S5. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 5, Figure S6. 13C NMR spectrum of compound 5, Figure S7. 1H NMR spectrum of target material III, Figure S8. 13C NMR spectrum of target material III, Figure S9. 1H NMR spectrum of target material IV, Figure S10. 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3) spectrum of target material IV, Figure S11. UV-vis normalized absorption spectra of materials studied in THF solution, Figure S12. J-V characteristics of I hole only devices, Figure S13. J-V characteristics of II hole only devices, Figure S14. J-V characteristics of III hole only devices, Figure S15. J-V characteristics of IV+PC71BM (10%) hole only devices, Figure S16. J-V characteristics of I electron only devices, Figure S17. J-V characteristics of II electron only devices, Figure S18. J-V characteristics of III electron only devices, Figure S19. J-V characteristics of IV+PC71BM (10%) electron only devices, Figure S20. J-V curves of photodetectors under AM1.5G illumination (100 mW/cm2) of solar simulator, Figure S21. EQE (a) and normalized EQE (b) spectra of photodetectors. Arrows with numbers indicate the maxima of the spectra and their position, Table S1. The best photovoltaic parameters of single-component photodetectors under AM1.5G illumination (100 mW/cm2), Table S2. Maximum EQE values and positions of peaks. References [40,41,42] are cited in the Supporting Information.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Y.P. and S.A.P.; Methodology, A.L.M. and Y.N.L.; Validation, A.L.M. and D.Y.P.; Formal Analysis, A.L.M.; Investigation, A.L.M.; Resources, D.O.B., E.D.P., A.N.S. and Y.N.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.L.M.; Writing—Review and Editing, Y.N.L., D.Y.P. and S.A.P.; Supervision, D.Y.P.; Project Administration, S.A.P.; Funding Acquisition, S.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 19-73-30028. Characterization of the synthesized molecules was carried out using the equipment of the Collaborative Access Center ‘Center for Polymer Research’ of Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials of the Russian Academy of Sciences with financial support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Contract FFSM-2021-0005). The device fabrication and characterization were carried out by using the equipment purchased under the Lomonosov Moscow State University Program of Development.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank N.K. Kalinichenko for her help in the synthesis of molecules, L. Feriancová for synthesizing the TTP4FTT-CO molecule, A.K. Kalinichenko for his help in the photodetectors fabrication, and N.M. Surin and E.A. Svidchenko for optical absorption spectra measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds I–IV are available from the authors.

References

  1. Ren, H.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Tang, J. Recent Progress in Organic Photodetectors and Their Applications. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2002418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Wen, H.; Bao, Q.; Shen, L.; Ding, L. Organic Photodetectors: Materials, Structures, and Challenges. Sol. RRL 2020, 4, 2000139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Feron, K.; Lim, R.; Sherwood, C.; Keynes, A.; Brichta, A.; Dastoor, P. Organic Bioelectronics: Materials and Biocompatibility. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 19, 2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Martino, N.; Ghezzi, D.; Benfenati, F.; Lanzani, G.; Antognazza, M.R. Organic Semiconductors for Artificial Vision. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shaposhnik, P.A.; Zapunidi, S.A.; Shestakov, M.V.; Agina, E.V.; Ponomarenko, S.A. Modern Bio and Chemical Sensors and Neuromorphic Devices Based on Organic Semiconductors. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020, 89, 1483–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Skhunov, M.; Solodukhin, A.N.; Giannakou, P.; Askew, L.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Balakirev, D.O.; Kalinichenko, N.K.; Marko, I.P.; Sweeney, S.J.; Ponomarenko, S.A. Pixelated Full-Colour Small Molecule Semiconductor Devices towards Artificial Retinas. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 5858–5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, G.; Yip, H.-L.; Lau, T.-K.; Lu, X.; Zhu, C.; Peng, H.; Johnson, P.A.; et al. Single-Junction Organic Solar Cell with over 15% Efficiency Using Fused-Ring Acceptor with Electron-Deficient Core. Joule 2019, 3, 1140–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, K.; Qin, J.; Xu, J.; Li, W.; Xiong, J.; Liu, J.; Xiao, Z.; Sun, K.; et al. 18% Efficiency Organic Solar Cells. Sci. Bull. 2020, 65, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wan, J.; Dyadishchev, I.; Sun, R.; Wu, Q.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Peregudova, S.; Ponomarenko, S.; Luponosov, Y.; Min, J. High-Performance Ternary Solar Cells by Introducing a Medium Bandgap Acceptor with Complementary Absorption, Reducing Energy Disorder and Enhancing Glass Transition Temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 17122–17131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, S.-H.; Yusoff, A.R.b.M.; Lee, C.; Yoon, S.C.; Noh, Y.-Y. Toward Color-Selective Printed Organic Photodetectors for High-Resolution Image Sensors: From Fundamentals to Potential Commercialization. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2022, 147, 100660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Gao, M.; Kim, J.; Zhou, Z.; Chung, D.S.; Yin, H.; Ye, L. Challenges and Recent Advances in Photodiodes-Based Organic Photodetectors. Mater. Today 2021, 51, 475–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ihama, M.; Hayashi, M.; Maehara, Y.; Mitsui, T.; Takada, S. CMOS Color Image Sensor with Overlaid Organic Photoelectric Conversion Layers Having Narrow Absorption Band: Depression of Dark Current. In Proceedings of the Organic Photovoltaics VIII, San Diego, CA, USA, 12 November 2007; Volume 6656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seo, H.; Aihara, S.; Namba, M.; Watabe, T.; Ohtake, H.; Kubota, M.; Egami, N.; Hiramatsu, T.; Matsuda, T.; Furuta, M.; et al. Stacked Color Image Sensor Using Wavelength-Selective Organic Photoconductive Films with Zinc-Oxide Thin Film Transistors as a Signal Readout Circuit. In Proceedings of the Sensors, Cameras, and Systems for Industrial/Scientific Applications XI, San Jose, CA, USA, 25 January 2010; Volume 7536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jansen-van Vuuren, R.D.; Armin, A.; Pandey, A.K.; Burn, P.L.; Meredith, P. Organic Photodiodes: The Future of Full Color Detection and Image Sensing. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4766–4802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Roncali, J.; Grosu, I. The Dawn of Single Material Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1801026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. He, Y.; Li, N.; Brabec, C.J. Single-Component Organic Solar Cells with Competitive Performance. Org. Mater. 2021, 03, 228–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Canjeevaram Balasubramanyam, R.K.; Kandjani, A.E.; Harrison, C.J.; Abdul Haroon Rashid, S.S.A.; Sabri, Y.M.; Bhargava, S.K.; Narayan, R.; Basak, P.; Ippolito, S.J. 1,4-Dihydropyrrolo[3,2- b ]Pyrroles as a Single Component Photoactive Layer: A New Paradigm for Broadband Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 27875–27882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, M.; Li, Y.-Z.; Chen, H.-C.; Liu, C.-W.; Chen, Y.-S.; Lo, Y.-C.; Tsao, C.-S.; Huang, Y.-C.; Liu, S.-W.; Wong, K.-T.; et al. Unveiling the Underlying Mechanism of Record-High Efficiency Organic near-Infrared Photodetector Harnessing a Single-Component Photoactive Layer. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 1171–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pal, A.; Gedda, M.; Goswami, D.K. PTCDI-Ph Molecular Layer Stack-Based Highly Crystalline Microneedles As Single-Component Efficient Photodetector. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 946–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Antoniou, G.; Yuan, P.; Koutsokeras, L.; Athanasopoulos, S.; Fazzi, D.; Panidi, J.; Georgiadou, D.G.; Prodromakis, T.; Keivanidis, P.E. Low-Power Supralinear Photocurrent Generation via Excited State Fusion in Single-Component Nanostructured Organic Photodetectors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 7575–7585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mannanov, A.L.; Savchenko, P.S.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Solodukhin, A.N.; Ponomarenko, S.A.; Paraschuk, D.Y. Charge Photogeneration and Recombination in Single-Material Organic Solar Cells and Photodetectors Based on Conjugated Star-Shaped Donor-Acceptor Oligomers. Org. Electron. 2020, 78, 105588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Balakirev, D.O.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Mannanov, A.L.; Savchenko, P.S.; Minenkov, Y.; Paraschuk, D.Y.; Ponomarenko, S.A. Star-Shaped Benzotriindole-Based Donor-Acceptor Molecules: Synthesis, Properties and Application in Bulk Heterojunction and Single-Material Organic Solar Cells. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 181, 108523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Solodukhin, A.N.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Mannanov, A.L.; Savchenko, P.S.; Bakirov, A.V.; Shcherbina, M.A.; Chvalun, S.N.; Paraschuk, D.Y.; Ponomarenko, S.A. Branched Electron-Donor Core Effect in D-π-A Star-Shaped Small Molecules on Their Properties and Performance in Single-Component and Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. Energies 2021, 14, 3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luponosov, Y.N.; Solodukhin, A.N.; Mannanov, A.L.; Savchenko, P.S.; Raul, B.A.L.; Peregudova, S.M.; Surin, N.M.; Bakirov, A.V.; Shcherbina, M.A.; Chvalun, S.N.; et al. Effect of Oligothiophene π-Bridge Length in D-π-A Star-Shaped Small Molecules on Properties and Photovoltaic Performance in Single-Component and Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells and Photodetectors. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 22, 100863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guerrero, A.; Garcia-Belmonte, G. Recent Advances to Understand Morphology Stability of Organic Photovoltaics. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Collins, S.D.; Ran, N.A.; Heiber, M.C.; Nguyen, T.-Q. Small Is Powerful: Recent Progress in Solution-Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roncali, J.; Leriche, P.; Blanchard, P. Molecular Materials for Organic Photovoltaics: Small Is Beautiful. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3821–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kalinichenko, N.K.; Balakirev, D.O.; Savchenko, P.S.; Mannanov, A.L.; Peregudova, S.M.; Paraschuk, D.Y.; Ponomarenko, S.A.; Luponosov, Y.N. Effects of Electron-Withdrawing Group and π-Conjugation Length in Donor-Acceptor Oligothiophenes on Their Properties and Performance in Non-Fullerene Organic Solar Cells. Dye. Pigment. 2021, 194, 109592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Solodukhin, A.N.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Mannanov, A.L.; Dmitryakov, P.V.; Peregudova, S.M.; Chvalun, S.N.; Parashchuk, D.Y.; Ponomarenko, S.A. Effect of Branching on the Physical and Photovoltaic Properties of Donor–Acceptor Oligomers Based on Triphenylamine. Mendeleev Commun. 2019, 29, 385–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luponosov, Y.N.; Solodukhin, A.N.; Mannanov, A.L.; Savchenko, P.S.; Minenkov, Y.; Paraschuk, D.Y.; Ponomarenko, S.A. Effect of Fused Triphenylamine Core in Star-Shaped Donor-π-Acceptor Molecules on Their Physicochemical Properties and Performance in Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 177, 108260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bowmaker, J.K.; Dartnall, H.J. Visual Pigments of Rods and Cones in a Human Retina. J. Physiol. 1980, 298, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Min, J.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Baran, D.; Chvalun, S.N.; Shcherbina, M.A.; Bakirov, A.V.; Dmitryakov, P.V.; Peregudova, S.M.; Kausch-Busies, N.; Ponomarenko, S.A.; et al. Effects of Oligothiophene π-Bridge Length on Physical and Photovoltaic Properties of Star-Shaped Molecules for Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 16135–16147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Min, J.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Gerl, A.; Polinskaya, M.S.; Peregudova, S.M.; Dmitryakov, P.V.; Bakirov, A.V.; Shcherbina, M.A.; Chvalun, S.N.; Grigorian, S.; et al. Alkyl Chain Engineering of Solution-Processable Star-Shaped Molecules for High-Performance Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1301234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Feriancová, L.; Dmitry, O.B.; Roman, S.F.; Alexey, V.K.; Vasiliy, A.T.; Eugenia, A.S.; Svetlana, M.P.; Petr, V.D.; Martin, P.; Sergey, A.P.; et al. Novel Low-Bandgap Donor–Acceptor Thiophene-Phenylene Co-Oligomers for Organic Light-Emitting Transistors. Dye. Pigment. 2022. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  35. Min, J.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Ameri, T.; Elschner, A.; Peregudova, S.M.; Baran, D.; Heumüller, T.; Li, N.; Machui, F.; Ponomarenko, S.; et al. A Solution-Processable Star-Shaped Molecule for High-Performance Organic Solar Cells via Alkyl Chain Engineering and Solvent Additive. Org. Electron. 2013, 14, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dartnall, H.J.A.; Bowmaker, J.K.; Mollon, J.D. Human Visual Pigments: Microspectrophotometric Results from the Eyes of Seven Persons. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1983, 220, 115–130. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang, D.; Ma, D. Development of Organic Semiconductor Photodetectors: From Mechanism to Applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1800522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baeg, K.-J.; Binda, M.; Natali, D.; Caironi, M.; Noh, Y.-Y. Organic Light Detectors: Photodiodes and Phototransistors. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4267–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kielar, M.; Dhez, O.; Pecastaings, G.; Curutchet, A.; Hirsch, L. Long-Term Stable Organic Photodetectors with Ultra Low Dark Currents for High Detectivity Applications. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kao, Y.-W.; Lee, W.-H.; Jeng, R.-J.; Huang, C.-F.; Wu, J.Y.; Lee, R.-H. Peripheral Group Effects on the Photophysical and Photovoltaic Properties of Bulk-Heterojunction Type Solar Cells Based on Star-Shaped Conjugate Molecules with Triphenylamine Core. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 163, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, P.; Sharmoukh, W.; Xu, B.; Li, Y.Y.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L. Novel and Stable D–A−π–A Dyes for Efficient Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; He, Q.; He, C.; Yang, C.; Bai, F.; Li, Y. Solution-Processable Red-Emission Organic Materials Containing Triphenylamine and Benzothiodiazole Units: Synthesis and Applications in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 7745–7752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 00368 g001 550
Figure 1. The absorbance spectra of the four classes of human photoreceptors, as follows: rods (R), blue-sensitive cones (S), green-sensitive cones (M), and red-sensitive cones (L). Graphical image made by the authors using data from [31].
Figure 1. The absorbance spectra of the four classes of human photoreceptors, as follows: rods (R), blue-sensitive cones (S), green-sensitive cones (M), and red-sensitive cones (L). Graphical image made by the authors using data from [31].
Molecules 28 00368 g001
Molecules 28 00368 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structures of molecules I–IV that mimic human photoreceptors, as follows: (a) rods, (b) green-sensitive cones, (c) red-sensitive cones, and (d) blue-sensitive cones.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of molecules I–IV that mimic human photoreceptors, as follows: (a) rods, (b) green-sensitive cones, (c) red-sensitive cones, and (d) blue-sensitive cones.
Molecules 28 00368 g002
Molecules 28 00368 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for target molecules I (a) and III (b).
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for target molecules I (a) and III (b).
Molecules 28 00368 sch001
Molecules 28 00368 g003 550
Figure 3. UV-vis normalized absorption spectra of materials I–IV studied in thin films cast from THF solution.
Figure 3. UV-vis normalized absorption spectra of materials I–IV studied in thin films cast from THF solution.
Molecules 28 00368 g003
Molecules 28 00368 g004 550
Figure 4. Responsivity (a) and normalized responsivity (b) spectra of photodetectors. Arrows with numbers indicate the maxima and their positions.
Figure 4. Responsivity (a) and normalized responsivity (b) spectra of photodetectors. Arrows with numbers indicate the maxima and their positions.
Molecules 28 00368 g004
Molecules 28 00368 g005 550
Figure 5. Photodetector transients (for details see the Materials and Methods Section).
Figure 5. Photodetector transients (for details see the Materials and Methods Section).
Molecules 28 00368 g005
Table
Table 1. Hole (µh) and electron (µe) mobilities.
Table 1. Hole (µh) and electron (µe) mobilities.
Materialµh∙10−5, cm2V−1s−1µe∙10−5, cm2V−1s−1µh/µe
I7.0 ± 1.11.5 ± 0.34.7
II15 ± 41.15 ± 0.1213
III9.2 ± 1.45.4 ± 0.81.7
IV+PC71BM (10%)15.5 ± 2.719 ± 40.82
Table
Table 2. Maximum responsivity values, positions of peak sensitivity, and response time of the photodetectors.
Table 2. Maximum responsivity values, positions of peak sensitivity, and response time of the photodetectors.
Photoactive MaterialR, mA/W λ max R , nm τ*, µs
I375250.85 ± 0.10
II525550.74 ± 0.05
III535900.60 ± 0.08
IV+PC71BM (10%)2.64250.74 ± 0.08
Note: * Averaged time (three photodetectors were measured, each of them three times).
Table
Table 3. Maximum responsivity, the lowest dark current density, and specific detectivity under bias V = −0.1 V.
Table 3. Maximum responsivity, the lowest dark current density, and specific detectivity under bias V = −0.1 V.
Photoactive MaterialRbias, mA/WJdark, nA/cm2D*·1011, cm·Hz1/2W−1
I3212000.52
II68814.2
III505001.3
IV+PC71BM (10%)3.0460.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mannanov, A.L.; Balakirev, D.O.; Papkovskaya, E.D.; Solodukhin, A.N.; Luponosov, Y.N.; Paraschuk, D.Y.; Ponomarenko, S.A. Spectrally Selective Full-Color Single-Component Organic Photodetectors Based on Donor-Acceptor Conjugated Molecules. Molecules 2023, 28, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010368

AMA Style

Mannanov AL, Balakirev DO, Papkovskaya ED, Solodukhin AN, Luponosov YN, Paraschuk DY, Ponomarenko SA. Spectrally Selective Full-Color Single-Component Organic Photodetectors Based on Donor-Acceptor Conjugated Molecules. Molecules. 2023; 28(1):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mannanov, Artur L., Dmitry O. Balakirev, Elizaveta D. Papkovskaya, Alexander N. Solodukhin, Yuriy N. Luponosov, Dmitry Yu. Paraschuk, and Sergey A. Ponomarenko. 2023. "Spectrally Selective Full-Color Single-Component Organic Photodetectors Based on Donor-Acceptor Conjugated Molecules" Molecules 28, no. 1: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010368

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop