Next Article in Journal
Flavonoids with Anti-Angiogenesis Function in Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Hemp Seed Oil Inhibits the Adipogenicity of the Differentiation-Induced Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells through Suppressing the Cannabinoid Type 1 (CB1)
Previous Article in Special Issue
All-Nitrogen Energetic Material Cubic Gauche Polynitrogen: Plasma Synthesis and Thermal Performance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules29071569
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improvement in Electrochemical Performance of Waste Sugarcane Bagasse-Derived Carbon via Hybridization with SiO2 Nanospheres

by
Muhammad Mudassir Ahmad Alwi
1,
Jyoti Singh
2,
Arup Choudhury
2,*,
SK Safdar Hossain
3,* and
Akbar Niaz Butt
1
1
Department of Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 380, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi 835215, India
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 380, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(7), 1569; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071569
Submission received: 2 March 2024 / Revised: 19 March 2024 / Accepted: 26 March 2024 / Published: 31 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials for Energy Storage Devices)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sugar industries generate substantial quantities of waste biomass after the extraction of sugar water from sugarcane stems, while biomass-derived porous carbon has currently received huge research attention for its sustainable application in energy storage systems. Hence, we have investigated waste sugarcane bagasse (WSB) as a cheap and potential source of porous carbon for supercapacitors. The electrochemical capacitive performance of WSB-derived carbon was further enhanced through hybridization with silicon dioxide (SiO2) as a cost-effective pseudocapacitance material. Porous WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites were prepared via the in situ pyrolysis of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS)-modified WSB biomass. The morphological analysis confirms the pyrolytic growth of SiO2 nanospheres on WSB-C. The electrochemical performance of WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites was optimized by varying the SiO2 content, using two different electrolytes. The capacitance of activated WSB-C was remarkably enhanced upon hybridization with SiO2, while the nanocomposite electrode demonstrated superior specific capacitance in 6 M KOH electrolyte compared to neutral Na2SO4 electrolyte. A maximum specific capacitance of 362.3 F/g at 0.25 A/g was achieved for the WSB-C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite. The capacitance retention was slightly lower in nanocomposite electrodes (91.7–86.9%) than in pure WSB-C (97.4%) but still satisfactory. A symmetric WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 105 supercapacitor was fabricated and achieved an energy density of 50.3 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 250 W kg−1, which is substantially higher than the WSB-C//WSB-C supercapacitor (22.1 Wh kg−1).

1. Introduction

Globally, fossil fuel consumption has led to an increase in energy demand and environmental sustainability [1,2,3]. Over the last few decades, a number of factors including population growth, fossil fuel exhaustion, and waste material production have contributed to the increasing demand for limitless energy sources and storage devices [4,5]. There is a growing demand for environmentally friendly, affordable, and renewable energy systems. To make these systems reliable, an efficient and cost-effective energy storage system is necessary for securing power at low cost [6,7]. Research and commercial interest are growing in the use of waste biomass to produce porous carbon-based electrode materials for cost-effective and efficient energy storage systems, since biomass-derived carbon offers low cost, sustainability, porosity, and excellent electrical conductivity [8]. This strategy can boost up the global economy as well as reduce the waste biomass-derived environmental pollution [9]. Furthermore, it will help to reduce the environmental impact of burning waste biomass for energy [10].
For supercapacitors, carbon is the most commonly used electrode material because it offers excellent electrical conductivity, chemical resistance, and high thermal and mechanical stability. Various carbon materials including carbon nanotubes, graphene, and activated carbon have been widely investigated as electrode materials for supercapacitors [11]. For supercapacitor manufacturers, low material costs are the most important issue, in addition to different technical issues. Recently, biomass-derived carbon has become increasingly popular for manufacturing supercapacitors, due to its low cost, abundance, and environmental friendliness [12]. However, the capacitive performance of these carbon materials is very much dependent on their physical properties such as surface area, mesoporosity, electrical conductivity, and electrochemical stability [13,14,15]. Researchers have explored various chemical and physical activation processes to manipulate the porosity and surface area of biomass-derived carbon materials and thus enhance their electrochemical capacitive performances [16]. However, the activation treatment can somewhat improve the specific capacitance and charge–discharge capacity of biomass-derived carbon, but it requires further improvement in the capacitance and energy density of biomass-derived carbon to meet commercial demand [17,18].
Hybridization of biomass-derived carbon with redox-active materials can enhance capacitance through the combined effects of electrical double-layer capacitance (EDLC) and pseudocapacitance [19,20,21]. Numerous pseudocapacitance materials including transition metal oxides/sulfides [22,23,24,25], conducting polymers [26,27], and transition metal MXenes [28,29,30] have been extensively investigated to enhance the electrochemical capacitance of carbon materials via hybridization. Nonetheless, there have been limited attempts to enhance the energy density of biomass-derived carbon by incorporating pseudocapacitance materials. In two studies, Wu et al. [16] and Hu et al. [31], bamboo-derived carbon was enhanced by hybridization with nickel hydroxide and copper oxide. Tang et al. [32] achieved a specific capacitance of 234.2 F/g at 1 A/g and a rate capability of 71.4% at 20 A/g for bamboo shoot shell-derived carbon/SiC composites. Recently, the banana peel-derived carbon/MnO2 composite demonstrated a specific capacitance of 139.6 F/g at 300 mA/g with 92.3% capacitance retention after 1000 cycles [33]. Recently, agro-waste biomass-derived carbon materials have gained increasing interest for supercapacitor applications because of their high surface area and tannable porosity [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Among various agro-wastes, sugarcane bagasse (Sachharum officinarum) is a typical waste biomass generated in huge quantities in the sugar industries. Most of this waste sugarcane bagasse is disposed of on land, causing serious environmental pollution. Hence, it is a great opportunity to investigate these waste bagasse fibers as a possible precursor for producing porous carbon and then to make use of this carbon as a supercapacitor electrode material. Earlier, researchers studied the electrochemical capacitive performance of SB-derived carbon and achieved low capacitance [47,48,49,50]. Recently, a few research groups tried to enhance the capacitance of SB-derived carbon by the incorporation of pseudocapacitance materials like metal oxides [51] and conducting polymers [52].
Indian sugar mills produce ~3 tons of waste sugarcane bagasse per annum, and each mill discards this huge waste bagasse as residue or uses it as a source of heat to meet the sugar mill’s heat demand. In the present investigation, we explored waste sugarcane bagasse as a cheap carbon source and SiO2 as an environmentally friendly and cheap pseudocapacitance material to prepare WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced capacitive performance. The nanocomposites were prepared via the one-step pyrolytic decomposition of TEOS-modified bagasse fibers. The effects of SiO2 concentrations on the morphology and porosity of WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites were evaluated. The electrochemical measurements of different formulated WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites were studied on both alkaline and neutral electrolytes to compare their capacitive performance and electrochemical stability.

2. Results and Discussions

The functional groups generated in the different formulated waste SB-derived carbon materials were identified by FTIR spectroscopic analysis. Figure 1a illustrates the FTIR spectra of porous WSB-C and the different formulated WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites. Several IR peaks appear in the FTIR spectrum of porous WSB-C (Figure 1a). In addition, a strong peak at 1191 cm−1 and a weak peak at 907 cm−1 were observed for the stretching and bending vibration of C-C bond conjugated to C=C bond, respectively, while a medium IR band at 1643 cm−1 appeared for the stretching mode of C=C bonds [53]. The peak at 622 cm−1 raised in the spectra was perhaps due to the out-of-plane deformation of -OH groups [54]. In contrast to C-SB, the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites revealed many IR peaks related to SiO2. The peaks at 1092 and 487 cm−1 can be attributed to the intrinsic vibration of Si-O-Si and Si-O bonds [30], indicating the pyrolytic formation SiO2 nanospheres from TEOS. During the carbonization process of TEOS-modified SB fibers, the -O-Si(OEt)3 groups were detached from cellulose chains by the pyrolytic dissociation of C-O bonds, which are weaker than Si-O bonds, followed by hydrolysis into orthosilicic acid (Si(OH)4) and finally thermal decomposition into SiO2 [55,56]. Raman spectra of WSB-C and the different WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites are displayed in Figure 1b. Two characteristic Raman active bands at around 1593 and 1356 cm−1 appeared for all nanocomposite samples. The low frequency G band is related to graphitic lattice vibration with E2g mode, while the D band represents defects in graphitic structure. The degree of disorder in the different formulated samples was characterized by determining their ID/IG ratio [57]. As shown in Figure 1b, the ID/IG value of WSB-C is significantly lower than that of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites, indicating that there is a greater degree of graphitization in WSB-C as compared to the nanocomposites. The in situ pyrolytic growth of SiO2 nanospheres during carbonization of the TEOS-modified SB matrix perhaps impedes the graphitization kinetics. However, the higher ID/IG values of the nanocomposites suggest the greater extent of an amorphous phase in the nanocomposites compared to WSB-C, which can facilitate their electrochemical capacitive performances. The X-ray diffraction patterns of the formulated WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites are illustrated in Figure 1c. The XRD pattern of WSB-C reveals a strong peak at 2θ = 26.4°, assigned to the (002) plane of the graphite lattice [58]. This high intense graphitic (002) peak indicates the formation of highly crystalline carbon as a result of the carbonization of SB-derived crystalline cellulose, which was prepared by alkaline treatment of raw SB prior to the carbonization process. In contrast, the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites display several diffraction peaks at 2θ = 20.4°, 36.5°, 39.3°, 40.2°, 42.3°, and 50° corresponding to the (100), (110), (102), (111), (200), and (112) crystalline planes of SiO2, respectively [59], along with a (002) peak of crystalline graphite. The intensity of the graphitic (002) peak gradually decreases with increasing SiO2 concentration in the nanocomposites, which might be related to the degree of graphitization of the SB matrix. It can be noticed that the position of the (002) crystalline peak slightly shifted toward lower 2θ values for the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites compared to WSB-C. The lower 2θ values of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites indicate their higher d-spacing compared to WSB-C. The d-spacing of WSB-C, WSB-C/SiO2 1025, WSB-C/SiO2 105, and WSB-C/SiO2 11 are calculated to be 0.33, 0.341, 0.358, and 0.347 nm, respectively. The results indicate the disordered layer structure of graphite with multi-layered stacking [60], which is well in agreement with the Raman spectroscopy results. The greater d-spacing of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites can facilitate the easy diffusion of electrolyte ions into electrodes during electrolysis, making them potential candidates for energy storage applications. Furthermore, there is a weak and broad peak appearing in the 2θ range of 21–25° for the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites, indicating some degree of amorphous SiO2 and carbon [61]. The surface characteristics of SB-derived carbon and its nanocomposites were evaluated by BET analysis. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of WSB-C and the formulated WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites are illustrated in Figure 2a. A mixture of type I and type IV isotherms is observed for both WSB-C and the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites, indicating a typical combination of micropores and mesopores [62]. The initial part of the isotherm follows type I adsorption, which is attributed to the controlled monolayer adsorption by micropores [63]. However, the middle of the isotherm shows a characteristic hysteresis loop indicating the presence of large mesopores with a wide pore size distribution. The specific surface areas and total pore volumes of the different samples are presented in Figure 1. The specific surface areas and pore volumes were decreased for the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites compared to WSB-C. The maximum SBET and total pore volume of 342 m2/g and 0.0426 cm3/g were recorded for WSB-C, while the lowest values of 115.7 m2/g and 0.0219 cm3/g were obtained for the WSB-C/SiO2 11 nanocomposite containing higher concentrations of SiO2 nanoparticles. This could be attributed to the blocking of micropores by SiO2 nanoparticles, as evidenced in the FE-SEM images. In contrast to microporosity, the mesoporosity of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites is significantly increased compared to WSB-C, and the C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite exhibits the highest amount of mesoporosity with 74.2%. The BJH pore size distributions of WSB-C and the different formulated WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites are displayed in Figure 2b. The average diameters of the pores of the different samples are presented in Table 1. The pore size is gradually increased with increasing SiO2 content, which might be the result of pore enlargement caused by heterogeneous shrinkage during the carbonization process [64].
The surface chemical compositions of the as-synthesized WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites were determined by XPS analysis. Figure 3a demonstrates the XPS survey curves of activated SB-derived carbon and the different WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites. The XPS signals for three major elements such as carbon (C), oxygen (O), and silicon (Si) at ~285 eV, ~531 eV, and ~104 eV are observed in the survey curves of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites, while WSB-C contained no elemental silicon. As is obvious, the peak intensity of elemental Si for the nanocomposites gradually increased with increasing TEOS loading in the modified-SB fibers. Figure 3b displays the core level Si 2p spectra of WSB-C/SiO2 105 consisting of a single Gaussian peak at 104.3 eV, corresponding to the Si-O-Si bond of SiO2 nanospheres [62]. The C 1s spectra is deconvoluted into four peaks at 284.1 eV, 284.9 eV, and 287.5 eV, shown in Figure 3c, which are associated with C=C, C-C, and C=O bonds, respectively. The atomic percentages of elemental C, Si, and O in the different formulated carbon samples are demonstrated in Figure 3d. The results indicate that the atomic percentage of carbon is reduced for the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites compared to WSB-C. The lowest yield of 77.21% was recorded for WSB-C/SiO2 11, which is 17% lower than that achieved for WSB-C. Furthermore, the at% of carbon is gradually decreased with increasing TEOS content in modified-SB. These findings suggest that the degree of carbonization/graphitization of SB was affected by the in situ formation of SiO2, which might be due to the change in the heat of carbonization during the pyrolysis process.
The microstructures of SB-derived carbon and its hybrids with SiO2 were observed with SEM analysis and the resulting images are shown in Figure 4. The orderly aligned channels appear in the cross-sectional images of the nanocomposites with multiple sizes of pores on their surfaces. The top surface of the WSB-C displays slightly crumpled features with multiple size pores (Figure 4a). In contrast, the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites clearly exhibit a uniform distribution of SiO2 nanospheres on the porous carbon surface. The concentration of SiO2 nanospheres gradually increases with increasing TEOS loading in the modified-SB precursor. For the WSB-C/SiO2 1025 and WSB-C/SiO2 105 nanocomposites, the majority of SiO2 nanospheres remain discrete and embedded into the carbon matrix (Figure 4d), while the SiO2 nanospheres are largely agglomerated in the WSB-C/SiO2 11 nanocomposite (Figure 4e). The extensive agglomeration of SiO2 nanospheres reduced the specific surface area and limited the pseudocapacitive effects of the WSB-C/SiO2 11 nanocomposite, which have been observed in the BET and CV results. The cross-sectional view of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites in Figure 4f–h exhibits three-dimensional (3D) channels within the carbon matrix. This 3D structure provides plenty of space for growing SiO2 nanospheres. Like tree trunks, these channels remain aligned along their longitudinal axis, which can facilitate the transport of electrolyte through them. Furthermore, the cross-sectional images reveal a uniform dispersion of SiO2 nanospheres throughout the channel wall, which can facilitate the access of electrolyte ions to redox-active SiO2 and thus enhance the capacitance efficiency of the nanocomposites.
The effects of SiO2 nanospheres on the electrochemical properties of SB-derived activated carbon were evaluated using CV and GCD measurements. Figure 5a demonstrates the CV profiles of WSB-C and the different WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites in a potential range of -1.0 to 0 V at 50 mV/s. The WSB-C electrode reveals a nearly rectangular CV curve with no obvious redox peaks, suggesting the behavior of an electrical double-layer capacitor with fast charge and discharge processes. On the other hand, the CV curves of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes reveal a distorted rectangular shape with a pair of faradaic redox peaks, suggesting both EDLC and pseudocapacitance characteristics of the WSB-C/SiO2 electrode. The oxidation and reduction peaks appear at −0.12 and −0.30 V, respectively. The redox reactions involved during the electrochemical process in the KOH electrolyte can be illustrated as follows [65]:
S i I I O 2 + K + + e − ↔ S i I I I O O K  
For the WSB-C/SiO2 electrodes, the anodic peak current gradually increased for the WSB-C/SiO2 1025 and WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrodes but it decreased for the WSB-C/SiO2 11 electrode. The WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode exhibited better pseudocapacitive characteristics in terms of current response to voltage. However, the decrease in anodic current of the WSB-C/SiO2 11 electrode was the result of the agglomeration of SiO2 nanospheres (as shown in the FE-SEM image) and the subsequent decrease in surface area of active SiO2. The CV curves of the WSB-C electrode in a wide range of scan rates are displayed in Figure 5b. The CV curves retained a nearly rectangular shape even at a high scan rate of 125 mV/s, indicating the fast and reversible EDLC behavior of the WSB-C electrode. The shape of the CV profiles of the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode remained unchanged with a small shift in redox peak position upon increasing the scan rate (Figure 5c), suggesting its high-rate capability over a wide range of scan rates.
It is necessary to study the kinetics of charge storage in WSB-C/SiO2 electrodes at different potentials in order to identify the mechanism behind the charge stored in them. In general, there are two different mechanisms through which the total charge is stored: (i) diffusion mechanism (intercalation/deintercalation) and (ii) capacitive mechanism [64]. The Power’s law was used to characterize this phenomenon [65]:
i   V = a ϑ b  
where ϑ is the scan rate and b is the slope of the linear plot of Log (i) vs. Log ( ϑ ). Two conditions based on the b values determine the mechanism responsible for charge storage: if b = 0.5, the diffusion-controlled intercalation process is dominant over the capacitive process, and when b = 1.0, the capacitive contribution is higher than the diffusion contribution. Figure 5d demonstrates the logarithmic linear plots between redox current and scan rate. In the present case, the b values for anodic and cathodic processes are 0.6835 and 0.7386, respectively, which suggests that the charge storage process is governed by both surface-controlled and diffusion-controlled mechanisms. Furthermore, the diffusion-controlled faradaic process made a considerable contribution to enhancing the charge storage capability of the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode. The large fraction of mesopores in the WSB-C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite facilitated the intercalation/deintercalation of electrolyte ions. The relative currents from the capacitive and diffusion processes at different scan rates can be determined using the given equation [66]:
i   V = k 1 ϑ + k 2 ϑ 1 / 2  
where k 1 ϑ and k 2 ϑ 1 / 2 values correspond to the current contribution from the diffusion and capacitive processes, respectively. Figure 5e reveals the percent contribution of the diffusion and capacitive processes to the CV area at 5 mV/s. The low scan rate favors the diffusion process and thus diffusion is dominant over the capacitive contribution. As scan rates increase, the diffusion contribution gradually decreases, and the capacitive contribution steadily increases (Figure 5f).
The impedance analyses (EIS) were further carried out to investigate the ionic diffusion kinetics for the as-synthesized WSB-C and its nanocomposites with SiO2 [67]. The Nyquist plots, shown in Figure 6a, allow us to compare the impedance properties of the different formulated electrode materials. WSB-C exhibits a solution resistance (Rs) of 2.86 Ω due to the relatively low hydrophilicity of carbon material, while the low Rs values of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposites suggest their better hydrophilic characteristics. At high frequencies, Nyquist plots represent charge-transfer resistance (RCT), while at low frequencies a line with a 45° slope represents capacitive behavior. Table 2 presents the fitted values for each component for each material. The charge-transfer resistance of WSB-C was significantly reduced upon the inclusion of the SiO2 nanospheres. The lower charge-transfer resistance of the WSB-C/SiO2 electrodes reflects their electrochemical performance. The equivalent circuit model for WSB-C/SiO2 105 is shown in the inset of Figure 6a.
The gravimetric charge–discharge (GCD) profiles of the pure WSB-C and the different WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes at a current density of 1 A/g are demonstrated in Figure 6b. A nearly symmetric triangular charge–discharge curve appears for the WSB-C electrode, indicating pure non-faradaic EDLC behavior. The WSB-C electrode reveals a Coulombic efficiency of 100.6% at 1 A/g, suggesting its excellent electrochemical reversibility. In contrast, the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes display asymmetric distorted triangular charge–discharge curves with an obvious discharge plateau at ~0.4 V, suggesting faradaic contribution to the overall charge storage process. Furthermore, there was a longer discharge time for the WSB-C/SiO2 electrodes than for the WSB-C electrodes, indicating that the nanocomposites have superior capacity for storing charge than the WSB-C electrodes. Among the nanocomposite electrodes, the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode took the maximum time to discharge, indicating greater charge storage capability. Figure 6c illustrates the GCD curves of the WSB-C electrode at different current densities. The symmetric features of the GCD curves remain unaffected upon increasing the current density, indicating excellent rate capability. The GCD profiles of the WSB-C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite electrode at various current densities between 0.25 and 5 A/g are demonstrated in Figure 6d. The asymmetric features of the GCD curves appear for all GCD curves due to the pseudocapacitance effects. The gravimetric specific capacitances (Cgsp) of the WSB-C and the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes were calculated from their respective GCD curves, using Equation (4):
C g s p = I ∆ t m ∆ V
Figure 6e demonstrates the variation in specific capacitances as a function of current densities for the different electrodes. The results clearly exhibit a significant improvement in the specific capacitance of SB-derived carbon upon hybridization with SiO2. The specific capacitances of the WSB-C/SiO2 1025, WSB-C/SiO2 105, and WSB-C/SiO2 11 electrodes are ~160%, ~240%, and ~210% higher than those of the pure WSB-C electrodes, respectively. The highest specific capacitance of 362.3 F/g at 0.25 A/g was achieved for the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode. Table 3 presents that the specific capacitance of the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode is higher than those previously reported for similar types of electrode materials. The capacitance values gradually reduced from 362.3 to 220.6 F/g when the current density increased from 0.25 to 5 A/g, indicating an excellent capacitance retention of 61% even with a 20-fold increase in current density. However, a relative lower capacitance retention was observed for WSB-C/SiO2 1025 (49% retention) and WSB-C/SiO2 11 (37% retention). The lower capacitance retention in the WSB-C/SiO2 1025 and WSB-C/SiO2 11 electrodes might be ascribed to the presence of a smaller fraction of mesopores and some fraction of unused SiO2 at high current densities. The cycling stability of the WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes was compared with that of the WSB-C electrode, shown in Figure 6f. The nanocomposite electrodes revealed somewhat lower cycling stability than the WSB-C electrode, which might be due to their limited pseudocapacitance contribution at higher cycles [68]. The highest cycling stability of 97.4% was achieved for the WSB-C electrode, while the cycling stability went down to 91.7% and 86.9% for the WSB-C/SiO2 105 and WSB-C/SiO2 11 electrodes, respectively. This might be due to the relatively low electrochemical stability of metal oxide compared to carbon.
The capacitive performance of the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode was further evaluated in neutral electrolyte, i.e., 1 M Na2SO4, and the results were compared with those obtained in alkaline electrolyte, i.e., 6 M KOH. The CV profiles of the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode over the potential window of −1.0 to 0 V in 1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte at different scan rates are illustrated in Figure 7a. Nearly rectangular-shaped CV curves with a pair of oxidation and reduction peaks centered at −0.49 V and −0.64 V are observed, indicating the involvement of both EDLC and pseudocapacitance mechanisms in the charge storage process. The redox peaks are associated with the reactions given in Equation (5) [76]:
S i I I O 2 + N a + + e − ↔ S i I I I O O N a  
There is almost no change in the shape of the CV profiles when the scan rate is increased from 5 to 125 mV/s, indicating the high-rate capability and electrochemical stability of the nanocomposite electrode in Na2SO4 electrolyte. The total current gradually increases with the increasing scan rate. The GCD profiles for the two-electrode system at various current densities are displayed in Figure 7b. The distorted triangular shape of the GCD curves with a voltage plateau further suggests the occurrence of faradaic surface-redox reactions during the charge storage process. The Coulombic efficiency was determined to be 100.9%. The specific capacitances at different current densities were determined from the corresponding GCD curves, using Equation (4). Figure 7c reveals the gravimetric specific capacitance of the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrode at different current densities in two different electrolytes, i.e., 6 M KOH and 1 M Na2SO4. The maximum specific capacitance of 319.8 F/g at 0.25 A/g was achieved in 1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. As can be seen in Figure 7c, the capacitive performance of the nanocomposite electrode is somewhat lower in the Na2SO4 electrolyte than in the KOH electrolyte. Compared to K+ ions, Na+ ions have a bigger size and higher internal resistance, resulting in a slower transport rate, which results in lower capacitance. With the Na2SO4 electrolyte, the WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrodes show a lower rate capability of 46.8% than with the KOH electrolytes (61%). For hydrated Na+ ions, their larger size is indeed unfavorable to smooth transportation and diffusion, especially at higher current densities, resulting in lower capacitance. The nanocomposite electrode exhibited superior cycling stability with capacitance retention of 95.6% after 10,000 cycles in 1 M Na2SO4 compared to that in 6 M KOH (91.7%), as shown in Figure 7d. The relatively lower cycling stability in the alkaline electrolyte might be due to the harsh and corrosive nature of the strong alkaline electrolyte (KOH) compared to the neutral Na2SO4 electrolyte. Figure 7e demonstrates the Ragone plots for the as-assembled symmetric WSB-C//WSB-C and WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 105 devices in KOH and Na2SO4 electrolytes. The WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 105 device in 6 M KOH electrolyte delivered a maximum energy density of 50.3 WH kg−1 at a power density of 250 W kg−1, which is significantly greater than that produced by the WSB-C//WSB-C device (22.1 Wh kg−1 at 250 W kg−1). The as-achieved energy density is superior to earlier reported biomass-derived carbon-based symmetric supercapacitors such as silkworm cocoon-derived carbon (34.4 Wh kg−1) [77]; wheat bran-derived carbon (32.7 Wh kg−1) [78]; peanut meal-derived carbon (24.9 Wh kg−1) [79]; rice straw-derived carbon (7.8 Wh kg−1) [80]; coconut shell-derived carbon (14.7 Wh kg−1) [81]; sugarcane bagasse-derived carbon (37.5 Wh kg−1) [82]; and cornstalk-derived carbon (10 Wh kg−1) [83]. Furthermore, the SC device achieved higher energy density in KOH electrolyte than in Na2SO4 electrolyte (44.4 Wh kg−1). The mechanism of electrochemical process and LED lightening of the as-fabricated symmetric WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 105 device is displayed in Scheme 1. The LED bulb (1.5 V) was lit with two symmetric WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 105 electrodes after charging to 1.5 V, where the dimension of each electrode used in the device was 1.5 × 1.5 cm2. The LED bulb showed stable brightness for 30 min. The results indicate that the present WSB-C/SiO2//WSB-C/SiO2 symmetric supercapacitors have great potential for energy storage applications with impressive market value. This impressive energy density of waste sugarcane bagasse-derived carbon/SiO2 105 makes it a potential cost-effective and environmentally friendly electrode material for next-generation supercapacitors.

3. Experimental

3.1. Materials

Waste sugarcane bagasse fibers were collected from a sugar mill in Uttar Pradesh, India. Potassium hydroxide (KOH), glacial acetic acid, triethyl orthosilicate, ethanol, and liquid ammonia solution were collected from Alfa Asare, India. All chemicals were utilized without undergoing additional purification.

3.2. Activation and Chemical Modification of Sugarcane Bagasse Fibers

The as-collected WSB fibers were initially washed thoroughly with DI water and dried at 60 °C. The dried WSB fibers were milled to size 40 mesh. For the activation process, 100 g WSB powder was dispersed in 500 mL 6 M KOH solution under stirring for 2 h. Afterward, the WSB fibers were treated with glacial acetic acid and washed with DI water to neutralize (pH = 7) them. The activated WSB fibers were then chemically modified with TEOS, where activated WSB fibers were mixed with different concentrations of TEOS (WSB fiber/WTEOS = 1/0.25, 1/0.5, and 1/1) in ethanol/water (80/20 v/v) and stirred for 3 h. Liquid NH3 was drop-wisely added to the solution for neutralization. The resulting TEOS-modified WSB fibers were washed with DI water and thermally cured at 120 °C for 3 h.

3.3. Carbonization of Activated SB and TEOS-Modified SB Fibers

The alkaline-activated WSB and TEOS-modified WSB fibers were carbonized at 600 °C under nitrogen flow (20 mL/min) using a tube furnace. The carbonization of activated WSB and TEOS-modified WSB fibers produced porous carbon (WSB-C) and carbon/SiO2 nanocomposites, respectively. The nanocomposites obtained from TEOS-modified WSB fibers with fiber/TEOS ratios of 1/0.25, 1/0.5, and 1/1 are designated as WSB-C/SiO2 1025, WSB-C/SiO2 105, and WSB-C/SiO2 11, respectively.

3.4. Structural Characterizations

FTIR and Raman analyses were conducted on Shimadzu IR-Prestige 21 (Shimadzu Corp, Japan) and Renishaw Raman System 3000 spectrophotometers (Renishaw, UK), respectively, using powdered samples. The XRD patterns of the samples were obtained with a Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Japan). The surface characteristics of the as-prepared materials were evaluated using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 adsorption analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, USA). An ESCA MultiLab 2000 spectroscopic analyzer (VG Systems Ltd. UK) was used to characterize the surface chemical compositions of the materials. A field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, S-4700, Hitachi, Japan) was used to take microstructural images of the as-prepared samples.

3.5. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical measurements were carried out in aqueous 6 M KOH electrolyte at room temperature (25 °C) using 3-electrode and 2-electrode cells for cycling voltametric (CV) and charge–discharge experiments, respectively. A potentiostat–galvanostat (SQUIDSTAT SOLO, Admiral Instruments, USA) was used for these measurements. For the 3-electrode cell, powdery sample-coated GCE with 2 µL Nafion solution (5 wt%), platinum sheet, and calomel electrode served as working, counter, and reference electrodes, respectively. For the 2-electrode configuration, two symmetric electrodes (1 × 1 cm2) consisting of active material-loaded Ni-foam were superimposed with a separator. The electrode was prepared by dispersing the WSB-C or WSB-C/SiO2 powder (~1.8 mg) on nickel foam and pressing under pressure of 15 tons, using a hydraulic press. EIS measurements were performed in a range of 100,000–0.1 Hz and an AC amplitude of 5 mV.

4. Conclusions

In summary, waste sugarcane bagasse-derived carbon/SiO2 nanocomposites were prepared through carbonization of TEOS-modified activated bagasse fibers. The capacitive performance of WSB-derived activated carbon was remarkably enhanced upon hybridization with SiO2, indicating a significant pseudocapacitive contribution from redox-active SiO2. A maximum capacitance of 362.3 F/g at 0.25 A/g was achieved for the WSB-C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite, which is around 2.5 times higher than that of the WSB-derived activated carbon. However, higher SiO2 concentrations decrease the capacitance of the nanocomposite due to the agglomeration of SiO2 particles, as shown for WSB-C/SiO2 11. The nanocomposite electrode demonstrated superior capacitance and energy density in KOH electrolyte compared to neutral Na2SO4 electrolyte. The WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 105 supercapacitor achieved an energy density of 50.3 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 250 W kg−1 in 6 M KOH electrolyte, which is considerably higher than that achieved in 1 M Na2SO4 (44.4 Wh kg−1). However, the cycling stability of the supercapacitor was significantly higher in neutral Na2SO4 electrolyte than in alkaline electrolyte. Hence, the WSB-C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite as an efficient, sustainable, and cheap electrode material could potentially be used in next-generation energy storage devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.A.A. and J.S.; methodology, M.M.A.A. and J.S.; software, M.M.A.A., J.S. and S.S.H.; validation, A.C. and S.S.H.; formal analysis, A.C., S.S.H. and A.N.B.; investigation, J.S., A.C. and S.S.H.; resources, S.S.H. and A.N.B.; data curation, A.C., S.S.H. and A.N.B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S., A.C. and S.S.H.; writing—review and editing, A.C., S.S.H. and A.N.B.; visualization, S.S.H. and A.N.B.; supervision, A.C.; project administration, S.S.H. and A.N.B.; funding acquisition, S.S.H. and A.N.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia, through project number INST087.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia, for funding this research work through project number INST087.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, S.; Chand, P. Supercapacitor and electrochemical techniques: A brief review. Results Chem. 2023, 5, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, W.; Wang, J.; Gao, S.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Li, Q. Photo-assisted charging of carbon fiber paper-supported CeO2/MnO2 heterojunction and its long-lasting capacitance enhancement in dark. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 1735–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vijayakumar, M.; Shankar, A.B.; Rohita, D.S.; Rao, T.N.; Karthik, M. Conversion of Biomass Waste into High Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes for Real-Time Supercapacitor Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 17175–17185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Castro-Gutierrez, J.; Celzard, A.; Fierro, V. Energy storage in supercapacitors: Focus on tannin-derived carbon electrodes. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Senthil, C.; Lee, C.W. Biomass-derived biochar materials as sustainable energy storage devices. Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev. 2020, 137, 110464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hatfield-Dodds, S.; Schandl, H.; Newth, D.; Obersteiner, M.; Cai, Y.; Baynes, T.; West, J.; Havlik, P. Assessing global resource use and greenhouse emissions to 2050, with ambitious resource efficiency and climate mitigation policies. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 144, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ostergaard, P.A.; Duic, N.; Noorollahi, Y.; Mikulcic, H.; Kalogirou, S. Sustainable Development using renewable energy technology. Renew. Energy 2019, 146, 2430–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sattayarut, V.; Wanchaem, T.; Ukkakimapan, P.; Yordsri, V.; Dulyaseree, P.; Phonyiem, M.; Endo, M. Nitrogen self-doped activated carbons via the direct activation of Samanea saman leaves for high energy density supercapacitors. RSC Advan. 2019, 9, 21724–21732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, T.; Luo, L.; Luo, L.; Deng, J.; Wu, X.; Fan, M.; Weigang, Z. High energy density supercapacitors with hierarchical nitrogen-doped porous carbon as active material obtained from bio-waste. Renew. Energy 2021, 175, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalak, T. Potential Use of Industrial Biomass Waste as a Sustainable Energy Source in the Future. Energies 2023, 16, 1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iqbal, S.; Khatoon, H.; Pandit, A.H.; Ahmad, S. Recent development of carbon-based materials for energy storage devices. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2019, 2, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Pan, H.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, K.; Ma, W.; Fan, S. Biomass-derived carbon for supercapacitors electrodes—A review of recent advances. Inorg. Chem. Comm. 2023, 153, 110768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, H.; Ye, S.; Zhou, J.; Liang, T. Biomass-derived porous carbon materials for supercapacitor. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Awasthi, G.P.; Bhattarai, D.P.; Maharjan, B.; Kim, K.S.; Park, C.H.; Kim, C.S. Synthesis and characterizations of activated carbon from Wisteria sinensis seeds biomass for energy storage applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 72, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pandolfo, A.G.; Hollenkamp, A.F. Carbon properties and their role in supercapacitors. J. Power Sour. 2006, 157, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, H.; Wen, J. Biomass porous carbon-based composite for high performance supercapacitor. Mater. Res. Expr. 2020, 7, 115601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sahu, R.K.; Gangil, S.; Bhargav, V.K.; Sahu, P.; Ghritalahre, B. Synthesizing biomass into nano carbon for use in high-performance supercapacitors—A brief critical review. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Devi, N.S.; Hariram, M.; Vivekanandan, S. Modification techniques to improve the capacitive performance of biocarbon materials. J. Energy Storage 2021, 33, 101870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iqbal, S.; Rasheed, T.; Bilal, M.; Shah, K.H.; Bilal, M.; Sheraz, T.A. Biomass-derived nitrogen-rich porous carbon composite for supercapacitor application. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 14793–14804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Hou, S.; Hao, C.; Zhang, J. Recent advances in flexible supercapacitors. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2022, 26, 2627–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borchardt, L.; Oschatz, M.; Kaskel, S. Tailoring porosity in carbon materials for supercapacitor applications. Mater. Horiz. 2014, 1, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saraf, M.; Natarajan, K.; Mobin, S.M. Robust nanocomposite of nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide and MnO2 nanorods for high-performance supercapacitors and nonenzymatic peroxide sensors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 10489–10504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, L.; Ji, P.; Geng, C.; Li, Y.; Meng, L.; Zhou, B.; Liang, J.; Peng, J.; Su, X. Facile synthesis of high-entropy (Co0.2Cr0.2Fe0.2Mn0.2Ni0.2)3O4 nanopowders and their electrochemical properties as supercapacitor electrode. J. Energy Storage 2023, 73, 109182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahmad, M.W.; Anand, S.; Dey, B.; Yang, D.J.; Choudhury, A. Asymmetric supercapacitors based on porous MnMoS4 nanosheets-anchored carbon nanofiber and N, S-doped carbon nanofiber electrodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 906, 164271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Cheng, F.; Cheng, C.; Miao, Y.; Gao, F.; Yu, J. Inactive Al3+-doped La(CoCrFeMnNiAlx)1/(5+x)O3 high-entropy perovskite oxides as high performance supercapacitor electrodes. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Anand, S.; Ahmad, M.W.; Saidi, A.K.A.A.; Yang, D.J.; Choudhury, A. Polyaniline nanofiber decorated carbon nanofiber hybrid mat for flexible electrochemical supercapacitor. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 254, 123480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Choudhury, A.; Dey, B.; Mohapatra, S.S.; Kim, D.W.; Yang, K.S.; Yang, D.J. Flexible and freestanding supercapacitor based on nanostructured poly (m-aminophenol)/carbon nanofiber hybrid mats with high energy and power densities. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 165401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Saraf, M.; Chacon, B.; Ippolito, S.; Lord, R.W.; Anayee, M.; Wang, R.; Inman, A.; Shuck, C.E.; Gogotsi, Y. Enhancing charge storage of Mo2Ti2C3 MXene by partial oxidation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2306815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saraf, M.; Zhang, T.; Averianov, T.; Shuck, C.E.; Lord, R.W.; Pomerantseva, E.; Gogotsi, Y. Vanadium and niobium MXenes—Bilayered V2O5 asymmetric supercapacitors. Small Methods 2023, 7, 2201551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saraf, M.; Shuck, C.E.; Norouzi, N.; Matthews, K.; Inman, A.; Zhang, T.; Pomerantseva, E.; Gogotsi, Y. Free-standing α-MoO3/Ti3C2 MXene hybrid electrode in water-in-salt electrolytes. Energy Environ. Mater. 2023, 6, e12516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, W.; Wang, B.; Yu, Y.; Wang, N.; Wu, X. Biomass derived carbon containing in-situ constructed nickel-based hydroxide nanostructures based on MnO2 template for high performance asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 884, 161149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhou, D.; Liu, C. Biomass-derived hierarchical porous carbon/silicon carbide composite for electrochemical supercapacitor. Colloids Surf. A. 2021, 620, 126567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, G.; Park, S.J. MnO2 and biomass-derived 3D porous carbon composites electrodes for high performance supercapacitor applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 741, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ali, G.A.M.; Manaf, S.A.A.; Divyashree, D.; Feng, C.K.; Hegde, G. Superior supercapacitive performance in porous nanocarbons. J. Energy Chem. 2016, 25, 734–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ali, G.A.M.; Manaf, S.A.B.A.; Kumar, A.; Chong, K.F.; Hegde, G. High performance supercapacitor using catalysis free porous carbon nanoparticles. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 495307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chmiola, J.; Yushin, G.; Gogotsi, Y.; Portet, C.; Simon, P.; Taberna, P.L. Anomalous increase in carbon capacitance at pore sizes less than 1 nanometer. Science 2006, 313, 1760–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kumar, A.; Hegde, G.; Manaf, S.A.B.A.; Ngaini, Z.; Sharma, K.V. Catalyst free silica templated porous carbon nanoparticles from bio-waste materials. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12702–12705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, X.; Li, S.; Mi, R.; Mei, J.; Liu, L.M.; Cao, L.; Lau, W.M.; Liu, H. Porous structure design of carbon xerogels for advanced supercapacitor. Appl. Energy 2015, 153, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rodrigues, A.C.; da Silva, E.L.; Oliveira, A.P.S.; Matsushima, J.T.; Cuña, A.; Marcuzzo, J.S.; Gonçalves, E.S.; Baldan, M.R. High-performance supercapacitor electrode based on activated carbon fiber felt/iron oxides. Mater. Today Commun. 2019, 21, 100553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, R.; Huang, J.; Li, J.; Cao, L.; Zhong, X.; Yu, A.; Lu, G. Nitrogen-doped porous hard carbons derived from shaddock peel for high-capacity lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 862, 114044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gong, Y.; Li, D.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, C. Nitrogen self-doped porous carbon for high-performance supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Ener. Mater. 2020, 3, 1585–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rodriguez Correa, C.; Otto, T.; Kruse, A. Influence of the biomass components on the pore formation of activated carbon. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 97, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cagnon, B.; Py, X.; Guillot, A.; Stoeckli, F.; Chambat, G. Contributions of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin to the mass and the porous properties of chars and steam activated carbons from various lignocellulosic precursors. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, Y.; Qu, Q.; Gao, S.; Tang, G.; Liu, K.; He, S.; Huang, C. Biomass derived carbon as binder-free electrode materials for supercapacitors. Carbon 2019, 155, 706–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahmed, M.H.; Byrne, J.A.; McLaughlin, J.A.D.; Elhissi, A.; Ahmed, W. Comparison between FTIR and XPS characterization of amino acid glycine adsorption onto diamond-like carbon (DLC) and silicon doped DLC. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 273, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, J.; Gao, J.; Chen, Y.; Hao, X.; Jin, X. Characterization, preparation, and reaction mechanism of hemp stem based activated carbon. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, W.; Wang, H.; Lan, W.; Li, D.; Zhang, A.; Liu, C. Construction of sugarcane bagasse-derived porous and flexible carbon nanofibers by electrospinning for supercapacitors. Indus. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J. 3-dimensional interconnected framework of N-doped porous carbon based on sugarcane bagasse for application in supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sourc. 2018, 390, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wahid, M.; Puthusseri, D.; Phase, D.; Ogale, S. Enhanced capacitance retention in a supercapacitor made of carbon from sugarcane bagasse by hydrothermal pretreatment. Energy Fuel 2014, 28, 4233–4240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Okonkwo, C.A.; Menkiti, M.C.; Obiora-Okafo, I.A.; Ezenwa, O.N. Controlled pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse enhanced mesoporous carbon for improving capacitance of supercapacitor electrode. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 146, 105996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pongpanyanatea, K.; Roddecha, S.; Piyanirund, C.; Phraewphiphat, T.; Hasin, P. Dispersed MnO2 nanoparticles/sugarcane bagasse-derived carbon composite as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 2354–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, J.; Qiu, J.; Wang, B.; Feng, H.; Yu, Y.; Sakai, E. Polyaniline/sugarcane bagasse derived biocarbon composites with superior performance in supercapacitors. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 801, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sun, Z.; Zhou, W.; Luo, J.; Fan, J.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, X. High-efficient and pH-sensitive orange luminescence from silicon-doped carbon dots for information encryption and bio-imaging. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2022, 607, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liang, Y.; Ouyang, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Chui, P.; Sun, K. Synthesis and characterization of core–shell structured SiO2@YVO4:Yb3+, Er3+ microspheres. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 3689–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ishak, S.; Mandal, S.; Lee, H.; Singh, J.K. pH-controlled synthesis of sustainable lauric acid/SiO2 phase change material for scalable thermal energy storage. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Nassifa, N.; Livage, J. From diatoms to silica-based biohybrids. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, C.; Park, S.H.; Cho, J.K.; Lee, D.Y.; Park, T.J.; Lee, W.J.; Yang, K.S. Raman spectroscopic evaluation of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon nanofibers prepared by electrospinning. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2004, 35, 928–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gong, X.; Zheng, S.; Zhao, X.; Vomiero, A. Engineering high-emissive silicon-doped carbon nanodots towards efficient large-area luminescent solar concentrators. Nano Energy 2022, 10, 107617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hariyanto, B.; Wardani, D.A.P.; Kurniawati, N.; Har, P.; Darmawan, N.; Irzaman. X-ray peak profile analysis of silica by Williamson–Hall and size-strain plot methods. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 012106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yin, L.; Wu, M.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Wang, Y. Synthesis of SiO2@carbon-graphene hybrids as anode materials of lithium-ion batteries. New Carbon Mater. 2017, 32, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, S.; Yang, D.; Zhang, W.; Qiu, X.; Li, Q.; Li, C. Dual-templated synthesis of mesoporous lignin-derived honeycomb-like porous carbon/SiO2 composites for high-performance Li-ion battery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 317, 111004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yulianti, R.T.; Destyorini, F.; Irmawati, Y.; Priyono, S.; Fauzi, M.H.; Umar, A.A.; Uyama, H.; Fauzia, V.; Yudianti, R. High capacitance performance of hierarchically SiO2 self-doped porous activated carbon derived from palm empty fruit bunches. J. Energy Stor. 2023, 71, 108153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Supriya1, S.; Bhat, V.S.; Jayeoye, T.J.; Rujiralai, T.; Chong, K.F.; Hegde, G. An investigation on temperature-dependant surface properties of porous carbon nanoparticles derived from biomass. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2022, 12, 495–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, L.; Ji, T.; Mu, L.; Shi, Y.; Brisbin, L.; Guo, Z.; Khan, M.A.; Young, D.P.; Zhu, J. Facile synthesis of mesoporous carbon nanocomposites from natural biomass for efficient dye adsorption and selective heavy metal removal. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 2259–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Y.; Jiang, S.P.; Shao, Z. Intercalation pseudocapacitance in electrochemical energy storage: Recent advances in fundamental understanding and materials development. Mater. Adv. 2020, 7, 100072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Joshi, A.; Lalwani, S.; Singh, G.; Sharma, R.K. Highly oxygen deficient, bimodal mesoporous silica-based supercapacitor with enhanced charge storage characteristics. Electrochim. Acta. 2019, 297, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sankar, K.V.; Surendran, S.; Pandi, K.; Allin, A.M.; Nithya, V.D.; Lee, Y.S.; Selvan, R.K. Studies on the electrochemical intercalation/de-intercalation mechanism of NiMn2O4 for high stable pseudocapacitor electrodes. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 27649–27656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sathiya, M.; Prakash, A.S.; Ramesh, K.; Tarascon, J.M.; Shukla, A.K. V2O5-Anchored carbon nanotubes for enhanced electrochemical energy storage. Mesoporous J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16291–16299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Jiang, H.; Hu, T.; Meng, C. Copper oxide/cuprous oxide/hierarchical porous biomass-derived carbon hybrid composites for high-performance supercapacitor electrode. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 782, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, N.; Deng, L.; Luo, D.; Zhang, P. One-step fabrication of biomass-derived hierarchically porous carbon/MnO nanosheets composites for symmetric hybrid supercapacitor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 526, 146696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yin, Y.; Yan, S.; Ni, Z.; Jin, C.; Zhao, L. Economical synthesized Mn3O4/biomass-derived carbon from vegetable sponge composites and its excellent supercapacitive behavior. Biomass Convers. Bioref. 2023, 13, 12115–12124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ren, Y.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Wang, B.; Yang, D.; Hu, J.; Liu, Z. Functionalization of biomass carbonaceous aerogels: Selective preparation of MnO2@CA composites for supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2014, 6, 9689–9697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Han, J.; Li, Q.; Peng, C.; Shu, N.; Pan, F.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y. Increasing S dopant and specific surface area of N/S-codoped porous carbon by in-situ polymerization of PEDOT into biomass precursor for high performance supercapacitor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 502, 144191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jiang, L.; Ren, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, X.; Zhang, H.; Wan, G. Bio-derived three-dimensional hierarchical carbon-graphene-TiO2 as electrode for supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cui, Z.; Gao, X.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, L.; Dong, L. Synthesis and supercapacitance of Co3O4 supported on porous carbon derived from wheat flour. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, M161–M165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ahmad, M.W.; Anand, S.; Dey, B.; Fatima, A.; Yang, D.J.; Choudhury, A. N/P/O/S heteroatom-doped porous carbon nanofiber mats derived from a polyacrylonitrile/l-cysteine/P2O5 precursor for flexible electrochemical supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 12177–12190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sun, J.; Niu, J.; Liu, M.; Ji, J.; Dou, M.; Wang, F. Biomass-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbons with tailored hierarchical porosity and high specific surface area for high energy and power density supercapacitors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, D.; Min, Y.; Yu, Y. Facile synthesis of wheat bran-derived honeycomb-like hierarchical carbon for advanced symmetric supercapacitor applications. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 19, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhao, G.; Li, Y.; Zhu, G.; Shi, J.; Lu, T.; Pan, L. Biomass-based N, P, and S self-doped porous carbon for high performance supercapacitors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 12052–12060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sudhan, N.; Subramani, K.; Karnan, M.; Ilayaraja, N.; Satish, M. Biomass-derived activated porous carbon from rice straw for a high-energy symmetric supercapacitor in aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, M. Eco-friendly preparation of biomass-derived porous carbon and its electrochemical properties. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 22689–22697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, N.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J. Nitrogen-doped biomass-based hierarchical porous carbon with large mesoporous volume for application in energy storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 348, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yue, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, Y.; Jiang, L.; Li, H.; Shi, F.; Liu, J. Nitrogen-doped cornstalk-based biomass porous carbon with uniform hierarchical pores for high-performance symmetric supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 3645–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 01569 g001
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) Raman spectra, and (c) XRD patterns of pure WSB−C and the different formulated WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites.
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) Raman spectra, and (c) XRD patterns of pure WSB−C and the different formulated WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites.
Molecules 29 01569 g001
Molecules 29 01569 g002
Figure 2. (a) Nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms and (b) Barrett−Joyner−Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution of WSB−C and the WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites.
Figure 2. (a) Nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms and (b) Barrett−Joyner−Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution of WSB−C and the WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites.
Molecules 29 01569 g002
Molecules 29 01569 g003
Figure 3. (a) XPS survey spectra of WSB-C and the WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites; the high-resolution spectra of (b) Si 2p and (c) C 1s along with the fitting peaks of the as-prepared WSB−C/SiO2 105; (d) atomic compositions of WSB−C and the WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites.
Figure 3. (a) XPS survey spectra of WSB-C and the WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites; the high-resolution spectra of (b) Si 2p and (c) C 1s along with the fitting peaks of the as-prepared WSB−C/SiO2 105; (d) atomic compositions of WSB−C and the WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposites.
Molecules 29 01569 g003
Molecules 29 01569 g004
Figure 4. SEM images of surface views of (a) WSB−C, (b) WSB−C/SiO2 1025, (c,d) WSB−C/SiO2 105, and (e) WSB−C/SiO2 11. SEM images of cross-sections of (f) WSB−C/SiO2 1025, (g) WSB−C/SiO2 105, and (h) WSB−C/SiO2 11.
Figure 4. SEM images of surface views of (a) WSB−C, (b) WSB−C/SiO2 1025, (c,d) WSB−C/SiO2 105, and (e) WSB−C/SiO2 11. SEM images of cross-sections of (f) WSB−C/SiO2 1025, (g) WSB−C/SiO2 105, and (h) WSB−C/SiO2 11.
Molecules 29 01569 g004
Molecules 29 01569 g005
Figure 5. (a) CV curves of WSB−C, WSB−C/SiO2 1025, WSB−C/SiO2 105, and WSB−C/SiO2 11 electrodes in 6 M KOH electrolyte at a scan rate of 50 mV/s; (b) CV profiles of the WSB−C electrode at different scan rates; (c) CV curves of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode at different scan rates; (d) linear fitting curves between ln (i) vs. ln (sweep rate) for the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode; (e) Dunn’s method analysis of the capacitance contribution of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode at 10 mV/s; and (f) contribution ratio of capacitive and diffusion-controlled processes at various scan rates.
Figure 5. (a) CV curves of WSB−C, WSB−C/SiO2 1025, WSB−C/SiO2 105, and WSB−C/SiO2 11 electrodes in 6 M KOH electrolyte at a scan rate of 50 mV/s; (b) CV profiles of the WSB−C electrode at different scan rates; (c) CV curves of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode at different scan rates; (d) linear fitting curves between ln (i) vs. ln (sweep rate) for the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode; (e) Dunn’s method analysis of the capacitance contribution of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode at 10 mV/s; and (f) contribution ratio of capacitive and diffusion-controlled processes at various scan rates.
Molecules 29 01569 g005
Molecules 29 01569 g006
Figure 6. (a) Nyquist plots of the WSB−C and the different WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes; (b) GCD curves of the WSB−C and the different WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes in 6 M KOH electrolyte; (c) GCD profiles of the WSB−C electrode at different current densities; (d) GCD curves of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode at different current densities; (e) variations in gravimetric capacitances of the WSB−C and the different WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes as a function of current density; (f) cyclic stability up to 10,000 cycles at 1 A/g for the WSB−C and the different WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes.
Figure 6. (a) Nyquist plots of the WSB−C and the different WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes; (b) GCD curves of the WSB−C and the different WSB-C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes in 6 M KOH electrolyte; (c) GCD profiles of the WSB−C electrode at different current densities; (d) GCD curves of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode at different current densities; (e) variations in gravimetric capacitances of the WSB−C and the different WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes as a function of current density; (f) cyclic stability up to 10,000 cycles at 1 A/g for the WSB−C and the different WSB−C/SiO2 nanocomposite electrodes.
Molecules 29 01569 g006
Molecules 29 01569 g007
Figure 7. (a) CV profiles of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite electrode in 1 M Na2SO4; (b) GCD profiles of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite electrode in 1 M Na2SO4; (c) variations in gravimetric capacitances of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode as a function of current density in two different electrolytes; (d) cyclic stability up to 10,000 cycles at 1 A/g for WSB−C/SiO2 105 in two different electrolytes; and (e) Ragone plots of the symmetric WSB−C/SiO2 105// WSB−C/SiO2 105 supercapacitor in two different electrolytes and the WSB−C//WSB−C supercapacitor in alkaline electrolyte.
Figure 7. (a) CV profiles of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite electrode in 1 M Na2SO4; (b) GCD profiles of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 nanocomposite electrode in 1 M Na2SO4; (c) variations in gravimetric capacitances of the WSB−C/SiO2 105 electrode as a function of current density in two different electrolytes; (d) cyclic stability up to 10,000 cycles at 1 A/g for WSB−C/SiO2 105 in two different electrolytes; and (e) Ragone plots of the symmetric WSB−C/SiO2 105// WSB−C/SiO2 105 supercapacitor in two different electrolytes and the WSB−C//WSB−C supercapacitor in alkaline electrolyte.
Molecules 29 01569 g007
Molecules 29 01569 sch001
Scheme 1. Mechanism of electrochemical process and the as-assembled prototype symmetric WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 device in KOH electrolyte with LED lightening.
Scheme 1. Mechanism of electrochemical process and the as-assembled prototype symmetric WSB-C/SiO2 105//WSB-C/SiO2 device in KOH electrolyte with LED lightening.
Molecules 29 01569 sch001
Table 1. Summary of BET characteristics of the as-prepared WSB-C and its nanocomposites.
Table 1. Summary of BET characteristics of the as-prepared WSB-C and its nanocomposites.
SampleWSB-CWSB-C/SiO2 1024WSB-C/SiO2 105WSB-C/SiO2 11
SBET (m2/g)342.8279.9207.7115.7
Vtotal (cm3/g)0.04260.3890.02880.0219
Mesopore (%)44.757.4 74.2 68.8
Dav (nm)3.463.633.924.47
Table 2. Calculated values of Rs, RCT, ZW, and CPE by fitting the experimental data.
Table 2. Calculated values of Rs, RCT, ZW, and CPE by fitting the experimental data.
SampleWSB-CWSB-C/SiO2 1024WSB-C/SiO2 105WSB-C/SiO2 11
Rs (Ω)2.170.8760.1140.064
RCT (Ω)11.596.392.574.38
Zw (Ω/s0.5)48.712.67 3.23 8.18
CPE (µF)11.4615.6323.9219.47
Table 3. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of the present WSB−C/SiO2 composites and those of similar biomass-derived carbon composite materials reported earlier.
Table 3. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of the present WSB−C/SiO2 composites and those of similar biomass-derived carbon composite materials reported earlier.
BiomassBiomass-Derived
Carbon (Cbiomass)
Composites		ElectrolytePotential Range (V)Sp. Capacitance (F/g)Cycling
Stability		Ref.
Bamboo leavesCbiomass/CuO/Cu2O1 M HCl−1.0 to +0.3 147@1 A/g93% after 5000 cycles[69]
Wasted litchi shellCbiomass/MnO6 M KOH −1.0 to +0.2[email protected] A/g93.5% after 5000 cycles[70]
Vegetable spongeCbiomass/Mn3O4 Composite1 M Na2SO40 to 1.0[email protected] A/g89.5% after 4500 cycles[71]
WatermelonCbiomass/MnO26 M KOH−1.0 to 0[email protected] A/g60% after 1000 cycles[72]
Waste bamboo shoot shellsCbiomass/PEDOT1 M H2SO40 to 1.0[email protected] A/g87% after 10,000 cycles[73]
LoofahCbiomass/TiO21 M H2SO40 to 1.0250.8@1 A/g84% after 100 cycles[74]
Wheat flourCbiomass/Co3O42 M KOH−0.8 to +0.4[email protected] A/g80% after 1000 cycles[75]
Waste sugarcane bagasseCbiomass/SiO26 M KOH−1.0–0.0[email protected] A/g91.7 after 10,000 cyclesPresent
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alwi, M.M.A.; Singh, J.; Choudhury, A.; Hossain, S.S.; Butt, A.N. Improvement in Electrochemical Performance of Waste Sugarcane Bagasse-Derived Carbon via Hybridization with SiO2 Nanospheres. Molecules 2024, 29, 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071569

AMA Style

Alwi MMA, Singh J, Choudhury A, Hossain SS, Butt AN. Improvement in Electrochemical Performance of Waste Sugarcane Bagasse-Derived Carbon via Hybridization with SiO2 Nanospheres. Molecules. 2024; 29(7):1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alwi, Muhammad Mudassir Ahmad, Jyoti Singh, Arup Choudhury, SK Safdar Hossain, and Akbar Niaz Butt. 2024. "Improvement in Electrochemical Performance of Waste Sugarcane Bagasse-Derived Carbon via Hybridization with SiO2 Nanospheres" Molecules 29, no. 7: 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071569

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop