Next Article in Journal
Regioselective Ethanolamination and Ketalization of 3-Ph-2,4-diacetyl(diethoxycarbonyl)-5-hydroxy-5-methylcyclohexanones
Previous Article in Journal
The 3-Attractor Water Model: Monte-Carlo Simulations with a New, Effective 2-Body Potential (BMW)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and X-ray Crystal Structure of Meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene)

by
Robert I. Haines
* and
Dean R. Hutchings
Department of Chemistry, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 4P3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2003, 8(2), 243-250; https://doi.org/10.3390/80200243
Submission received: 19 December 2002 / Revised: 12 January 2003 / Accepted: 13 January 2003 / Published: 28 February 2003

Abstract

:
The pendant-arm macrocycle, meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene) has been synthesized and its single crystal structure determined. The molecule crystallizes in a primitive monoclinic cell, with the space group P21/a (#14). The cell dimensions are a = 10.778(3)Å, b = 13.809(3) Å, c = 11.420(2) Å, ∃ = 102.49(2)°, volume = 1659.5(6) Å3.

Introduction

There is significant interest in the synthesis and properties of polyazamacrocycles bearing pendant-arms, particularly those having arms attached at the nitrogen atoms of the macrocycles. Most such functionalized macrocycles are often prepared by elaborate multi-step procedures, with synthesis of partially functionalized macrocycles being more difficult than fully-functionalized ones. Interest in these molecules and their transition metal complexes has focussed on applications to catalysis [1], ion-selectivity [2] and their use as radioimmunotherapy agents [3]. Recent reviews have examined pendant-arm macrocycles as models for biological molecules [4] and the synthesis and reactivity of multinuclear macrocyclic complexes [5]. The synthesis and structure of polyazamacrocycles bearing pendant coordinating groups attached to the nitrogen donor atoms has been reviewed [6], as well as the synthesis and properties of transition metal complexes of tri- and tetraazamacrocycles [7].
We are currently interested in the effect of steric hindrance on the electron transfer properties of transition metal macrocycles. Our research involves the synthesis of pendant-arm polyazamacrocycles and their metal complexes, and the study of their redox kinetics [8]. This paper presents the synthesis and characterization of a tetraazamacrocycle derived from meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane (“tetA”) bearing two pendant 1-methylnaphthalene groups, together with the X-ray crystal structure of the compound. The title pendant-arm macrocycle is shown in Figure 1. The red numbering in the figure refers to the NMR assignments (listed in the Experimental section below); the blue numbering corresponds to the atom labeling in the crystallographic data and the black numbering (1,4,8 and 11) correspond to the compound’s nomenclature.
Figure 1. Structural representation of the 1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene) derivative of tet A
Figure 1. Structural representation of the 1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene) derivative of tet A
Molecules 08 00243 g001
The molecule is of particular interest for several reasons: as a tetraazamacrocycle it can coordinate to redox-active first-row transition metals; the pendant methylnaphthalenes provide steric bulk around the macrocycle, hindering close approach of redox agents and so should influence electron-transfer kinetics; and the methylnaphthalene groups introduce the possibility of interesting fluorescence behaviour of the macrocycle and its metal complexes.

Results and Discussion

Refluxing of tetA with 1-chloromethylnaphthalene in the presence of carbonate (to remove by-product HCl as NaCl, carbon dioxide and water) results in alkylation of the ring nitrogens via a nucleophilic substitution reaction, represented by:
tetA + 2 RCl + Na2CO3 → tetA(R)2 + 2 NaCl + CO2 + H2O
where R = -CH2C10H7.
Generally, attempts to functionalize polyazamacrocycles by this method usually result in fully-substituted macrocycles. In the present system, the presence of the geminal dimethyl groups at the 5- and 12- positions of tet A introduce sufficient steric hindrance to limit substitution to the 1- and 8- positions only. While the synthetic procedure described in the Experimental section uses a 2:1 stoichiometric ratio of reactants, experiments using a stoichiometric excess (> 4.2:1) of 1-chloro-methylnaphthalene to tet A, with prolonged refluxing (2 weeks) still only produced the di-substituted product. The presence of unsubstituted N-H groups in the product was confirmed by the band at 3259 cm-1 in the infrared.
The title compound was found to be virtually insoluble in water, but very soluble in THF. Thus X-ray quality crystals were produced by allowing the THF to slowly evaporate from an 80% by volume solution of THF in water, containing the compound. The structure of the molecule, displayed using the Mercury 1.1 crystal structure visualization program (available as a free download from CCDC) is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Mercury 1.1 display of meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene)
Figure 2. Mercury 1.1 display of meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene)
Molecules 08 00243 g002
The bond lengths and bond angles are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1. Bond lengths (Å)
Table 1. Bond lengths (Å)
atomatomDistanceAtomatomDistance
N1C31.49(1) N1C41.46(1)
N2C11.50(1) N2C51.47(1)
N2C61.46(1) C1C21.51(1)
C1C171.53(1) C2C31.52(1)
C3C181.55(1) C3C191.54(1)
C4C51.51(1) C6C71.52(1)
C7C81.37(1) C7C151.41(1)
C8C91.41(1) C9C101.35(1)
C10C161.41(1) C11C121.34(1)
C11C161.40(1) C12C131.40(1)
C13C141.38(1) C14C151.42(1)
C15C161.41(1)
Table 2. Bond Angles(o)
Table 2. Bond Angles(o)
atomatomatomAngleatomatomatomangle
C3N1C4115.1(7)C1N2C5111.3(7)
C1N2C6112.6(7)C5N2C6110.8(7)
N2C1C2112.4(8)N2C1C17114.3(8)
C2C1C17111.5(9)C1C2C3120.3(9)
N1C3C2107.8(8)N1C3C18113.1(8)
N1C3C19108.4(8)C2C3C18109.7(8)
C2C3C19108.7(9)C18C3C19109.0(9)
N1C4C5113.2(8)N2C5C4114.8(8)
N2C6C7112.9(8)C6C7C8120.1(9)
C6C7C15121.1(9)C8C7C15119(1)
C7C8C9122(1)C8C9C10120(1)
C9C10C16121(1)C12C11C16120(1)
C11C12C13122(1)C12C13C14120(1)
C13C14C15119.9(9)C7C15C14121.9(9)
C7C15C16120(1)C14C15C16118.1(9)
C10C16C11121(1)C10C16C15119(1)
C11C16C15121(1)
The C-C, C-N, C-H bond lengths are in the normal range, as are the bond angles. The macrocycle maintains a conformation with the 1-methylnaphthalene arms trans to one another and to the adjacent methyl groups at the 5- and 14- positions of the macrocycle. This is the sterically least hindered conformation. The molecule has a centre of inversion, and there is hydrogen-bonding between N(1)-H and N(2), which serves to lend some rigidity to the macrocyclic ring. The naphthalene groups within each molecule are co-planar and are folded over the face of the macrocycle, effectively blocking access to the macrocycle’s cavity. It may be seen from the packing diagram (Figure 3) that there is long-range stacking of the naphthalene rings along the b axis of the unit cell.
Interestingly, we found little or no interaction between the macrocycle and nickel(II) ions in aqueous THF solutions when we attempted to prepare the nickel(II) complex of the ligand. While we were initially surprised by this observation, the crystal structure suggests that the macrocycle presents a very hydrophobic periphery, with access to the central cavity blocked by the pendant 1-methyl-naphthalene moieties.
Figure 3. Packing diagram, viewing along the b axis of the unit cell
Figure 3. Packing diagram, viewing along the b axis of the unit cell
Molecules 08 00243 g003
Current studies in our laboratory on this compound indicate that the macrocycle does form a complex with copper(II) ions, where the macrocyclic ligand is deformed, resulting in exposure of the cavity. This work will be reported later.

Experimental

General

NMR Spectra were obtained using a Bruker Avance 300MHz spectrometer, using deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) as solvent. FTIR Spectra were obtained as KBr pellets, using a Bruker Equinox 55 spectrometer.
X-Ray quality crystals of the title complex were obtained by slow effusion of THF from an aqueous THF solution of the macrocycle. A colourless plate crystal (0.06 x 0.20 x 0.24 mm) was mounted on a glass fibre. The X-ray structure determination was performed on a Rigaku AFC5R diffractometer, using graphite monochromated MoK radiation (8 = 0.71073 Δ) and a rotating anode generator. The structure was solved by direct methods [9] and expanded using Fourier techniques [10]. All calculations were performed using the teXsan [11] crystallographic software package of Molecular Structure Corporation. Atomic coordinates and equivalent anisotropic displacement parameters, together with torsion angles have been deposited with CCDC as supplementary information [12]. The crystallographic parameters are given in Table 3.
Table 3. Crystallographic parameters
Table 3. Crystallographic parameters
Empirical FormulaC38H52N4
Formula Weight564.86
Crystal Color, Habitcolourless, plate
Crystal Dimensions0.06 x 0.20 x 0.24 mm
Crystal Systemmonoclinic
Lattice TypePrimitive
Space GroupP21/a (#14)
Lattice Parametersa = 10.778(3) Å
b = 13.809(3) Å
c = 11.420(2) Å
β= 102.49(2)o
Volume1659.5(6) Å3
No. of Reflections Used for Unit Cell Determination (2q range)25 ( 20.4 - 26.0o )
Omega Scan Peak Width at Half-height0.25o
Z value2
Dcalc1.130 g/cm3
F000616.00
µ(MoK)0.66 cm-1
Function MinimizedS w (|Fo| - |Fc|)2
Least Squares Weights1/s2(Fo) = 4Fo2/s2(Fo2)
p-factor0.0142
Anomalous DispersionAll non-hydrogen atoms
No. Observations (I>3.00s(I))588
No. Variables101
Reflection/Parameter Ratio5.82
Residuals: R; Rw0.059 ; 0.056
Goodness of Fit Indicator2.31
Max Shift/Error in Final Cycle0.00
Maximum peak in Final Diff. Map0.16 e-3
Minimum peak in Final Diff. Map-0.18 e-3

Syntheses

1-Chloromethylnaphthalene (Aldrich) was used as received. Tet A was synthesized as the dihydrate according to the literature [13] and was recrystallized from water prior to use. Its purity was checked by MP (143-145°C; Lit.146-148°C [14]) and 1H-NMR (ppm): 1.06 and 1.05 (2 s, 12 H, 1), 1.38 (m, 4 H, 3), 2.80 (m, 2 H, 4), 0.98 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 6 H, 5), 3.2 (br s, 4H, 6), 2.80 (m, 2 H, 7) and 2.26 (d of t, J = 2.2 Hz and 11 Hz, 2 H, 7), 2.80 (m, 2 H, 5 and 8) and 2.52 (d of t, J = 2.6 Hz and 12 Hz, 5 and 8); 13C-NMR (ppm): 24.4 (1a), 29.1 (1b), 53.3 (2), 52.0 (3), 51.4 (4), 21.6 (5), 48.3 (7) and 42.4 (8); the IR spectrum (KBr) showed peaks at 3403 (N-H), 1177 (C-C-N), 1156 (C-N), 754 (N-H), and 511 cm-1 (C-N-C).

Meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene)

To a stirred solution of 1-chloromethylnaphthalene (8.66g, 0.0490 mol) in THF (20 mL) was added tetA.2H2O (7.75g, 0.0242 mol) in methanol (100 mL) and a solution containing Na2CO3 (5.20g, 0.0490 mol) in water (40 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 24 hours. The solution was cooled to room temperature and the white solid that had precipitated during the reaction was filtered, washed with cold water and air-dried. The solid was recrystallized from THF and water (yield 6.75 g (81.4 %)). M.P. 257 - 260 °C; 1H-NMR (ppm): 0.90 (s, 6H, 1a), 0.03 (s, 6H, 1b), 2.38 (m, 2H, 3) and 0.95 ppm (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 2H, 3), 2.93 (m, 2H, 4), 1.00 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 6H, 5), 3.23 and 1.75 (2 br s, 2H, 6 and 15), 3.45 (d of t, J = 3.0 Hz and 12 Hz, 2H, 7) and 2.39 (m, 2H, 7), 2.93 (m, 2H, 8) and 2.39 (m, 2H, 8), 4.61 (d, J = 12 Hz, 2H, 19) and 3.37 (d , J = 12 Hz, 2H, 19), 7.81 (m, 1H, 21), 7.81 (m, 1H, 22), 9.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, 23), 7.42 (m, 1H, 25), 7.54 (m, 1H, 26), 7.54 (m, 1H, 27) and 7.42 (m, 1H, 28); 13C-APT NMR (ppm): 29.0 (1a), 22.0 (1b), 52.9 (2), 46.8 (3), 49.6 (4), 11.6 (5), 45.9 (7), 39.3 (8), 51.8 (19), 135.8 (20), 128.1 (21 and 22), 127.2 (23), 134.1 (24), 128.6 (25), 125.7 (26), 125.8 (27), 125.0 (28) and 133.5 (29); the IR spectrum (KBr) showed peaks at 3259 (N-H), 1597 and 1510 (aromatic ring stretch), 1198 (C-C-N), 779 to 807 (C-H out of plane deformation), 477 and 649 cm-1 (in plane ring deformation).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada for financial support, and the University of Prince Edward Island for a Senate Committee on Research Grant (SCRUG). Funding for the NMR and FTIR spectrometers was provided by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) and a generous donation from the Levesque Foundation. We are indebted to Dr. S. Cameron, Dalhousie University for the crystal structure determination.

References

  1. Collin, J.-P.; Sauvage, J.-P. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1987, 1075.
  2. Kimura, E.; Koike, T.; Takahashi, M. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1985, 385.
  3. Cox, J.P.L.; Jankowski, K.J.; Kataky, R.; Parker, D.; Beeley, N.R.A.; Boyce, B.A.; Eaton, M.A.W.; Miller, K.; Millian, A.T.; Harrison, A.; Walker, C. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1989, 797.Morphy, J.R.; Parker, D.; Kataky, R.; Harrison, A.; Eaton, M.A.W.; Millian, A.; Phipps, A.; Walker, C. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1989, 792.
  4. Costamagna, J.; Ferraudi, G.; Matsuhiro, B.; Campos-Vallette, M.; Canales, J.; Villagrán, M.; Vargas, J.; Aguirre, M.J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 196, 125.
  5. McAuley, A.; Subramanian, S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 200-202, 75.
  6. Wainwright, K.P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997, 166, 35.
  7. Haines, R.I. Rev. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 21, 165.
  8. Haines, R.I.; Baldwin, R. Transition Met. Chem. 2002, 27, 284.Bissessur, R.; Haines, R.I.; Hutchings, D.R.; Bruening, R. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1598.Haines, R.I.; Hutchings, D.R.; McCormack, T.M. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2001, 85, 1.Haines, R.I.; Hutchings, D.R.; Lucas, R.J.; Miller, D. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 54.
  9. SIR92: Altomare, A.; Cascarano, M.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A. J. Appl. Cryst. 1994, 26, 343.
  10. DIRDIF94: Beurskens, P.T.; Admiraal, G.; Beurskens, G.; Bosman, W.P.; de Gelder, R.; Israel, R; Smits, J.M.M. The DIRDIF-94 program system, Technical Report of the Crystallography Laboratory. University of Nijmegen: The Netherlands, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  11. teXsan for Windows version 1.05: Crystal Structure Analysis Package, Molecular Structure Corporation, 1997-8
  12. CCDC 199958 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained, free of charge, via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retreiving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033; email: [email protected]).
  13. Douglas, B.E. Inorganic Syntheses; Vol. 18, John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1978; pp. 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  14. Curtis, N.F. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 2644.
  • Sample Availability: Samples of meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene) are available from MDPI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haines, R.I.; Hutchings, D.R. Synthesis and X-ray Crystal Structure of Meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene). Molecules 2003, 8, 243-250. https://doi.org/10.3390/80200243

AMA Style

Haines RI, Hutchings DR. Synthesis and X-ray Crystal Structure of Meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene). Molecules. 2003; 8(2):243-250. https://doi.org/10.3390/80200243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haines, Robert I., and Dean R. Hutchings. 2003. "Synthesis and X-ray Crystal Structure of Meso-5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,8-di-(1-methylnaphthalene)" Molecules 8, no. 2: 243-250. https://doi.org/10.3390/80200243

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop