Next Article in Journal
Chitosan Derivatives as Important Biorefinery Intermediates. Quaternary Tetraalkylammonium Chitosan Derivatives Utilized in Anion Exchange Chromatography for Perchlorate Removal
Next Article in Special Issue
The Stable Level of Glutamine synthetase 2 Plays an Important Role in Rice Growth and in Carbon-Nitrogen Metabolic Balance
Previous Article in Journal
Crystal Structure, Chemical Bonding and Magnetism Studies for Three Quinary Polar Intermetallic Compounds in the (Eu1−xCax)9In8(Ge1−ySny)8 (x = 0.66, y = 0.03) and the (Eu1−xCax)3In(Ge3−ySn1+y) (x = 0.66, 0.68; y = 0.13, 0.27) Phases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Responses to Oxidative and Heavy Metal Stresses in Cyanobacteria: Recent Advances
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms16059037
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpressing of OsAMT1-3, a High Affinity Ammonium Transporter Gene, Modifies Rice Growth and Carbon-Nitrogen Metabolic Status

by
Aili Bao
,
Zhijun Liang
,
Zhuqing Zhao
and
Hongmei Cai
*
Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River), Microelement Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(5), 9037-9063; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16059037
Submission received: 15 March 2015 / Revised: 11 April 2015 / Accepted: 13 April 2015 / Published: 23 April 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulation of Plant Mineral Nutrition: Transport, Sensing and Signalling)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
AMT1-3 encodes the high affinity NH4+ transporter in rice roots and is predominantly expressed under nitrogen starvation. In order to evaluate the effect of AMT1-3 gene on rice growth, nitrogen absorption and metabolism, we generated AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and analyzed the growth phenotype, yield, carbon and nitrogen metabolic status, and gene expression profiles. Although AMT1-3 mRNA accumulated in transgenic plants, these plants displayed significant decreases in growth when compared to the wild-type plants. The nitrogen uptake assay using a 15N tracer revealed poor nitrogen uptake ability in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants. We found significant decreases in AMT1-3-overexpressing plant leaf carbon and nitrogen content accompanied with a higher leaf C/N ratio. Significant changes in soluble proteins and carbohydrates were also observed in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants. In addition, metabolite profile analysis demonstrated significant changes in individual sugars, organic acids and free amino acids. Gene expression analysis revealed distinct expression patterns of genes that participate in carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Additionally, the correlation between the metabolites and gene expression patterns was consistent in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under both low and high nitrogen growth conditions. Therefore, we hypothesized that the carbon and nitrogen metabolic imbalance caused by AMT1-3 overexpressing attributed to the poor growth and yield of transgenic plants.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is one of the essential macronutrients required for plant growth and development and thus is often a major limiting factor for plant productivity and crop yield [1,2]. Nitrogen is not only a constituent of key cell molecules, such as amino acids, nucleic acids, chlorophyll, ATP and several plant hormones, but is also the pivotal regulator of numerous biological processes, including carbon metabolism, amino acid metabolism and protein synthesis [3,4]. Higher plants can absorb and use various forms of nitrogen components from the soil, most notably the inorganic ions ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−). These ions are believed to be the principal nitrogen sources for plant growth in agricultural and most natural environments, as it is required in greater amounts than any other mineral nutrient [5]. Because ammonium assimilation requires less energy than nitrate, ammonium is the preferential nitrogen source for root uptake, particularly in nitrogen-deficient plants [6,7]. Carbon (C) is also essential for plants to keep their fundamental growth and development. Various carbohydrates, for example, glucose, sucrose and organic acids provide both the energy and the carbon skeletons for NH4+ assimilation to produce amino acids and proteins. The proteins, in particular enzymes, are essential for nearly all cellular activities. Several studies have emphasized the importance of the coordination of carbon and nitrogen metabolism [8,9,10,11,12]. The optimal functioning of the metabolic pathways for carbon and nitrogen assimilation in plants, and maintaining an appropriate balance or ratio of carbohydrates to nitrogen metabolites in the cell, which is referred to as the “carbon/nitrogen balance”, are critical for determining plant growth, biomass accumulation and seed production [8,9,10,11,12].
Rice (Oryza sativa), a staple food for over half of the world’s population, is one of the most important crops worldwide. NH4+ is the major available form of nitrogen that is used for growing rice plants in paddy fields and requires ammonium transporters (AMTs) in the root plasma membrane, which belong to the AMT/MEP/Rh (Ammonium Transporter/Methylamine Permease/Rhesus) protein superfamily with homologs in bacteria and fungi [13,14]. Several ammonia transporters, including bacterial AMT; plant AMT; and human RhAG, RhBG, and RhCG, have been suggested to support electroneutral NH3 transport, NH3/H+ symport, NH4+ transport, NH4+/H+ antiport and NH4+/H+ symport [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. AMT/MEP proteins are integral membrane proteins that harbor 11 transmembrane helices and intracellular C terminals [26,27]. Biochemical studies have revealed that plant AMTs form trimers [16]. Recently, a different membrane protein type, aquaporins from the MIP (Major Intrinsic Proteins) superfamily, was also demonstrated to transport ammonia [28].
The cloning and expression analysis of AMT genes in several plant species have been reported to date. Arabidopsis harbors six AMT-type ammonium transporters, which are encoded by five genes (AtAMT1-1, AtAMT1-2, AtAMT1-3, AtAMT1-5, AtAMT2-1) expressed in the roots and one gene (AtAMT1-4) expressed in the pollen [29]. AtAMT1-1 and AtAMT1-3 are expressed in rhizodermal and cortical cells, where they confer high-capacity and high-affinity ammonium uptake [30,31]. In addition, reciprocal leaf and root expression of AtAMT1-1 in response to nitrogen starvation has been reported by Engineer and Kranz [32]. AtAMT1-2 is expressed in endodermal and cortical cells and most likely plays a major role in the uptake and retrieval of ammonium from the apoplast in the root with a lower-affinity [31]. However, AtAMT2-1 is more highly expressed in shoots relative to roots, and no ammonium influx activity has been observed in the root [31,33,34]. AtAMT1-5 is expressed in rhizodermal root cells and contributes 5%–10% to the overall ammonium uptake capacity [31]. AtAMT1-4 is a pollen-specific high-affinity ammonium transporter in the plasma membrane [29]. Rice roots harbor four families of AMT genes: OsAMT1, OsAMT2, OsAMT3 and OsAMT4. OsAMT1 members have been characterized as a high-affinity transport system (HAT), share a highly similar sequence to each other, while the other three families have been characterized as a low-affinity transport system (LAT) [13,35]. Sonoda et al. [35] demonstrated distinct expression patterns in the OsAMT1 gene family. OsAMT1-1 is constitutively expressed in the shoots but is stimulated by ammonium in the roots; OsAMT1-2 expression is root-specific and ammonium-inducible, whereas OsAMT1-3 is also expressed specifically in the roots but is repressed by nitrogen. OsAMT2-1 encodes an ammonium transporter, which is more closely related to the yeast MEP transporter sequence and is constitutively expressed in the shoots and roots [36,37]. Several studies revealed a feedback regulation and a distinct nitrogen-dependent regulation for the rice AMT genes, which differs from that in tomato or Arabidopsis. Sonoda et al. identified cytosolic glutamine as a promising regulatory factor of the OsAMT1 genes [35]. Additionally, AMT genes in several other plant species have been identified and characterized, including Brassica napus (BnAMT1-2) [38], Lotus japonicas (LjAMT1-1, LjAMT2-1) [39,40] and Lycopersicon esculentum (LeAMT1-1, LeAMT1-2 and LeAMT1-3) [41,42,43].
Generally, the expression of the AMT1 isolated from different plant species are transcriptionally regulated. However, ectopically expressing of the AtAMT1-1 gene under the control of a 35S promoter in transgenic tobacco plants revealed that the AtAMT1-1 gene can also be post-transcriptionally regulated [44]. A post-translational regulation of ammonium transport activity has also been described for the AMT1 proteins in Arabidopsis. Loqué et al. reported that the cytosolic trans-activation domain in AMT was essential for ammonium uptake, a mutation in the cytosolic AMT1-1 C terminus attenuated the strict dependence on allosteric trans-activation [45,46]. The oligomerization of plant AMTs is critical for allosteric regulation of transport activity, in which the conserved cytosolic C terminus functions as a trans-activator [47]. AMT1-1 and AMT1-2 are allosterically regulated by C-terminal phosphorylation, which trans-inhibited the activation of AMT1 subunits in a trimeric complex [45,48,49]. AMT1-3 harbors a phosphomimic residue in its C terminus regulates both homo- and hetero-trimers in a dominant-negative fashion in vivo [47]. C-terminal phosphorylation of AMT1 is rapidly triggered by an external ammonium supply and decreases ammonium uptake by the roots and thereby quickly inactivating transport in a potentially toxic environment [49]. Additionally, Graff et al. [50] also reported that N-terminal cysteines affected the oligomer stability of the allosterically regulated ammonium transporter LeAMT1-1.
As we known, in agriculture, rice growth and yield requires abundant N. In order to meet the high production of rice, large amounts of synthetic N fertilizers are applied on arable land by farmers. However, crop plants use less than half of the applied N fertilizers [51]. Zhang et al. [52] reported that the N use efficiency of midseason rice in China is less than 30%. The applications of large quantities of synthetic N fertilizers to increase crop yield are not economically sustainable and placed a heavy economic burden on farmers, and also result in environmental pollutions. Because of the high-affinity NH4+ uptake function of AMT1-3 in rice, it is a good candidate gene for use in transformation strategies aimed at improving nitrogen use efficiency and rice yield. However, no study has been reported about the function of AMT1-3 gene in rice growth and carbon-nitrogen metabolism to date. In order to evaluate the effect of AMT1-3 gene on rice growth, nitrogen absorption and metabolism, we generated AMT1-3-overexpressing plants via the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method using the CaMV35S promoter in this study, and analyzed the growth phenotype, yield, leaf SPAD (Soil and Plant Analyzer Development) value, photosynthesis, carbon and nitrogen metabolic status and gene expression profiles under four different N levels (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N) at both tillering and heading stages. Results revealed that the overexpressing of AMT1-3 gene altered rice growth and development, yield, C/N ratio, soluble proteins and carbohydrates, carbon and nitrogen metabolites, gene expression patterns in transgenic plants when compared to the wild-type plants. Moreover, AMT1-3 may act as a signal sensor to regulate plant growth in addition to its function in NH4+ uptake in the root. Our results provided a new understanding of the function of AMT1-3 genes in rice growth, yield, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and a reference for the molecular breeding of the high nitrogen use efficiency rice cultivar using transgenic strategy.

2. Results

2.1. Accumulated AMT1-3 mRNA Transcripts in T0 Transgenic Plants

The complete mRNA sequence of OsAMT1-3 (AF289479) was identified in the NCBI GenBank database using a key word search. The OsAMT1-3 gene was amplified from the rice (Zhonghua 11, Japonica) genome and ligated into the pCAMBIA 1301S vector, which contained a hygromycin resistance gene driven by the CaMV35S promoter. The construct was then transformed into Zhonghua 11 using the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method (Figure 1A). More than 50 independent T0 transformants were generated, and 42 positive transformants were detected by PCR-directed analysis of the hygromycin resistance gene. Northern blot analysis of the transgene in these independent positive transgenic plants revealed that 21 (50%) transgenic plants harbored higher OsAMT1-3 mRNA levels than the wild-type Zhonghua 11 (Figure 1B). Southern blot analysis showed 1–2 copies of transgene existed in the OsAMT1-3-overexpressing plants (Figures S1). To examine the effect of higher OsAMT1-3 expression on plant growth, T1 progeny of the 21 OsAMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants were grown hydroponically in normal and low nitrogen (0.1× N) nutrient solutions. Six-week-old plants were harvested to measure the plant height and fresh weight. Generally, transgenic lines exhibited a poorer growth than the wild-type plants under both normal and low nitrogen conditions. Figure 2 showed that the plant height and fresh weight of two transgenic lines (3–12, 3–39) were significantly (p < 0.01) decreased when compared with wild-type plants under both normal and low nitrogen conditions. To avoid confounding effects of the excessively higher OsAMT1-3 gene expression on plant growth, we selected the T2 generation of transgenic line 3–39 with single copy of transformed AMT1-3, which displayed higher OsAMT1-3 levels than wild-type plants but were relatively lower among the 21 transgenic plants, for further analysis and was named AMT1-3-overexpressing plants.
Ijms 16 09037 g001 1024
Figure 1. Generation of transgenic plants that overexpressing the AMT1-3 gene. (A) The construct of the plasmid containing a derivative of the CaMV 35S promoter (35S), AMT1-3 and the poly A terminator between the right (RB) and the left (LB) borders of the T-DNA. The hygromycin resistance gene (hyg) was located between the LB and the 35S promoter; (B) Northern blot analysis of the AMT1-3 mRNA transcriptional levels in 42 positive transgenic plants of the T0 generation and the wild-type plants (WT).
Figure 1. Generation of transgenic plants that overexpressing the AMT1-3 gene. (A) The construct of the plasmid containing a derivative of the CaMV 35S promoter (35S), AMT1-3 and the poly A terminator between the right (RB) and the left (LB) borders of the T-DNA. The hygromycin resistance gene (hyg) was located between the LB and the 35S promoter; (B) Northern blot analysis of the AMT1-3 mRNA transcriptional levels in 42 positive transgenic plants of the T0 generation and the wild-type plants (WT).
Ijms 16 09037 g001
Ijms 16 09037 g002 1024
Figure 2. Phenotype analysis at the seedling stage. The growth phenotype (A), plant height (B) and plant fresh weight (C) of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (3–12, 3–39) and wild type plants (WT) at the seedling stage. Values are the mean ± s.d. of eight randomly selected plants. ** indicates the significant difference at the level of p = 0.01.
Figure 2. Phenotype analysis at the seedling stage. The growth phenotype (A), plant height (B) and plant fresh weight (C) of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (3–12, 3–39) and wild type plants (WT) at the seedling stage. Values are the mean ± s.d. of eight randomly selected plants. ** indicates the significant difference at the level of p = 0.01.
Ijms 16 09037 g002

2.2. Effect of AMT1-3-Overexpressing on Growth Phenotype and Yield

As the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed a poor growth phenotype at the seedling stage mentioned above, we analyzed the root length, plant height, root and shoot dry weight, leaf SPAD value and photosynthetic parameters of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants at both tillering and heading stages grown hydroponically under four different nitrogen levels (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N) to test the poor growth phenotype at both vegetative and productive stages in more detail. The AMT1-3-overexpressing and wild-type plant yields at a mature growth stage in pots were also tested. The results revealed a significant (p < 0.05) decline in the root length and plant height and in the root and shoot dry weight in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared to wild-type plants at both tillering and heading stages under the 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions (Figure 3). At the tillering stage, a 17.7%–31.2%, 8%–15.8%, 60.7%–77.3% and 58%–79.1% decrease in the root length, plant height and the root and shoot dry weights of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants were observed, respectively (Figure 3A). At the heading stage, a 11.3%–21.6%, 6.9%–19.2%, 38.6%–55.2% and 42.3%–55.1% decrease in the root length, plant height and the root and shoot dry weights of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants were observed, respectively (Figure 3B). The leaf SPAD value and photosynthetic parameters did not significantly differ between the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants, except for significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in the leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared with wild-type plants at the heading stage under the 1× N condition (Table 1). A yield analysis at the mature stage revealed decreases of 45.6%, 8.5%, 9.5% and 26.4% in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared with wild-type plants under the 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions, respectively (Table 2). These results indicated that AMT1-3 gene overexpressing could severely affect plant growth and development at both vegetative and productive stages under different nitrogen levels.
Ijms 16 09037 g003 1024
Figure 3. Phenotype analysis at the tillering and heading stages. The root length, plant height, root and shoot dry weight in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3–39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage (A) and the heading stage (B) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. Values are the mean ± s.d. of ten randomly selected plants. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Figure 3. Phenotype analysis at the tillering and heading stages. The root length, plant height, root and shoot dry weight in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3–39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage (A) and the heading stage (B) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. Values are the mean ± s.d. of ten randomly selected plants. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Ijms 16 09037 g003
Table
Table 1. The leaf SPAD value and photosynthetic parameters in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage and the heading stage under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N, 5× N conditions.
Table 1. The leaf SPAD value and photosynthetic parameters in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage and the heading stage under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N, 5× N conditions.
TreatmentSPADPhotosynthesis Parameters at Heading Stage
Tillering StageHeading StagePhotosynthetic Rate (μmol CO2·m−2·s−2)Stomatal Conductance (mmol·m−2·s−1)Intercellular CO2 Concentration (μL·L−1)Transpiration Rate (mmol H2O·m−2·S−1)
0× N
WT34.3 ± 2.432.7 ± 1.713.24 ± 1.470.28 ± 0.04280.48 ± 1.127.54 ± 0.65
OX-AMT1-334.3 ± 2.533.0 ± 1.411.84 ± 2.340.25 ± 0.05280.16 ± 8.556.71 ± 0.95
0.1× N
WT40.7 ± 2.040.7 ± 2.210.58 ± 1.640.29 ± 0.02297.52 ± 10.167.24 ± 0.25
OX-AMT1-342.3 ± 3.440.4 ± 1.212.88 ± 1.590.30 ± 0.05287.51 ± 11.307.20 ± 0.71
1× N
WT43.6 ± 2.047.1 ± 0.516.07 ± 1.780.41 ± 0.04290.97 ± 8.267.49 ± 0.47
OX-AMT1-344.4 ± 1.346.5 ± 1.312.49 ± 1.76 *0.27 ± 0.09 **278.65 ± 23.786.09 ± 1.47
5× N
WT44.4 ± 1.548.4 ± 1.319.12 ± 3.450.53 ± 0.05305.62 ± 15.747.85 ± 0.17
OX-AMT1-343.6 ± 4.047.4 ± 1.316.95 ± 2.390.48 ± 0.09300.49 ± 14.017.86 ± 1.04
Values are mean ± s.d. from ten randomly selected plants. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Table
Table 2. The yield and its components in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N, 5× N conditions.
Table 2. The yield and its components in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N, 5× N conditions.
TreatmentPanicals/PlantFilled Grains/PanicleSeed Rate (%)Thousand Grains Weight (g)Yield (g/Plant)
0× N
WT3.4 ± 0.319.1 ± 1.535.1 ± 1.524.46 ± 0.651.60 ± 0.11
OX-AMT1-32.5 ± 0.4 *15.6 ± 2.633.7 ± 1.222.89 ± 0.940.87 ± 0.05 **
0.1× N
WT4.0 ± 0.221.4 ± 3.536.4 ± 4.323.05 ± 0.742.00 ± 0.44
OX-AMT1-33.5 ± 0.221.9 ± 3.833.6 ± 4.823.68 ± 0.911.83 ± 0.23
1× N
WT11.5 ± 1.144.9 ± 4.966.9 ± 5.924.98 ± 0.2112.78 ± 0.42
OX-AMT1-311.6 ± 0.639.5 ± 4.364.8 ± 6.125.35 ± 0.3111.56 ± 0.87
5× N
WT14.6 ± 0.932.5 ± 2.365.9 ± 10.922.77 ± 0.7510.80 ± 0.41
OX-AMT1-315.6 ± 0.723.3 ± 0.6 **54.0 ± 4.421.87 ± 0.917.95 ± 0.26 **
Values are mean ± s.d. from ten randomly selected plants. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.

2.3. Effect of AMT1-3-Overexpressing on Nitrogen Uptake and Accumulation

As AMT1-3 is one of the high affinity ammonium transporter genes involved in NH4+ uptake in rice roots, we analyzed the 15N and total N contents in roots, stems and leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants. We employed the 15N tracer assay at the tillering stage to assess for differences in the nitrogen uptake ability in the root and in the nitrogen transport ability from the root to the stem and from the stem to the leaf between AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants. The results indicated that AMT1-3-overexpressing plants harbored lower 15N contents in the roots, stems and leaves, especially three days after NH4Cl in the nutrient solution was refreshed by 15NH4Cl (Figure 4). Furthermore, we analyzed the total carbon and nitrogen contents in the roots, stems and leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants under the 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions at this stage. Because we performed two independent assays, the plant materials differed from the materials used in the 15N tracer assay. The results indicated significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the leaf carbon and nitrogen contents in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared with wild-type plants under the 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions (Table 3). There were 4.6%, 9.9%, 5.9% and 5.8% decreases in the leaf carbon content, whereas decreases of 4.7%, 13.4%, 15.5% and 8.6% in the leaf nitrogen content under the 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions were observed, respectively, which resulted in leaf carbon/nitrogen ratio increases of 11.7%, 11.6% and 9.4% under the 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions, respectively (Table 3). These results suggest that AMT1-3-overexpressing plants exhibited a poor nitrogen transport ability. The nitrogen transport from stems to leaves was especially attenuated, which caused a higher carbon/nitrogen ratio in the leaves.
Ijms 16 09037 g004 1024
Figure 4. Nitrogen uptake analysis. The 15N (15N%) and total nitrogen content (TN%) in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3–39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at 1, 3, 8 h, 1 and 3 day after NH4Cl in the nutrient solution was replaced with 15NH4Cl during the tillering stage. Values are the mean ± s.d. of six randomly selected plants. ** indicates the significant difference at the level of p = 0.01.
Figure 4. Nitrogen uptake analysis. The 15N (15N%) and total nitrogen content (TN%) in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3–39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at 1, 3, 8 h, 1 and 3 day after NH4Cl in the nutrient solution was replaced with 15NH4Cl during the tillering stage. Values are the mean ± s.d. of six randomly selected plants. ** indicates the significant difference at the level of p = 0.01.
Ijms 16 09037 g004
Table
Table 3. The carbon content (C%), nitrogen content (N%) and carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N) in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N, 5× N conditions.
Table 3. The carbon content (C%), nitrogen content (N%) and carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N) in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N, 5× N conditions.
Treatment C% N% C/N
RootStemLeafRootStemLeafRootStemLeaf
0× N
WT38.54 ± 0.6038.26 ± 0.4340.10 ± 0.201.76 ± 0.060.96 ± 0.042.14 ± 0.0321.85 ± 0.7739.79 ± 1.0518.71 ± 0.25
OX-AMT1-336.36 ± ND36.07 ± 1.6338.25 ± 0.39 **1.62 ± ND1.02 ± 0.032.04 ± 0.0922.39 ± ND35.26 ± 0.61 **18.80 ± 0.67
0.1× N
WT38.47 ± 0.0738.88 ± 0.1040.52 ± 0.162.10 ± 0.141.40 ± 0.112.91 ± 0.1818.34 ± 1.1727.80 ± 2.2013.94 ± 0.81
OX-AMT1-339.13 ± 0.7637.53 ± 0.3936.51 ± 0.35 **2.13 ± ND1.39 ± 0.072.52 ± 0.15 *17.17 ± ND26.97 ± 1.5915.57 ± 0.85 *
1× N
WT37.48 ± 0.6037.00 ± 0.3641.46 ± 0.252.72 ± 0.0042.44 ± 0.083.75 ± 0.0813.77 ± 0.2015.19 ± 0.4911.05 ± 0.16
OX-AMT1-3ND36.21 ± 0.4639.01 ± 0.13 **ND2.37 ± 0.213.17 ± 0.14 **ND15.36 ± 1.2412.33 ± 0.59 *
5× N
WT37.69 ± 0.6136.96 ± 0.1841.46 ± 0.252.85 ± 0.163.04 ± 0.083.98 ± 0.0813.27 ± 1.0012.15 ± 0.31 10.41 ± 0.15
OX-AMT1-337.21 ± ND36.08 ± 0.7839.04 ± 0.72 **2.56 ± ND2.96 ± 0.023.43 ± 0.23 *14.52 ± ND12.18 ± 0.21 11.39 ± 0.60 *
Values are mean ± s.d. from three biological replications. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively. ND: no data.

2.4. Effect of AMT1-3-Overexpressing on Soluble Proteins and Carbohydrates Concentrations

As the nitrogen and carbon contents were changed by the overexpressing of AMT1-3 mentioned above, we wanted to evaluate the differences of carbon and nitrogen metabolic status between AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants. Therefore, we assessed the concentrations of soluble proteins and carbohydrates in the roots, stems and leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants at both tillering and heading stages under the 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. Our results demonstrated that most of the soluble proteins were in the leaves, whereas most of the soluble carbohydrates resided in the stems. Interestingly, the soluble proteins increased with increasing nitrogen levels, whereas an opposite trend was observed for soluble carbohydrates, which decreased with increasing nitrogen levels at both the tillering and heading stages (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The soluble protein and carbohydrate concentrations in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants were noticeably distinct from those of wild-type plants (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Compared to wild type plants, there were 18.5%, 4.9%, 14.3% decreases and 22.3% increase of soluble proteins in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants at tillering stage under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions, respectively. While an opposite change pattern displayed at heading stage that there were 8.6%, 5.8%, 7.8% increases and 1.3% decrease of soluble proteins in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions, respectively (data not show here). For soluble carbohydrates, 15.5%, 18.5%, 2.1% and 10.4% decreases displayed in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants at tillering stage, while 3.8% decrease, 19.0% increase, 10.6% decrease and 28.1% increase displayed in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants at heading stage under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions, respectively (data not show here). Additionally, there was a certain change in the concentrations of root, stem and leaf soluble proteins and carbohydrates in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants when compared to wild type plants (Figure 5 and Figure 6). For example, soluble proteins analysis at the tillering stage revealed significant (p < 0.05) increases in the root under the 0.1× N (30.6%) and 1× N (66.9%) conditions and in the leaf under the 5× N (40.4%) condition, as well as significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the stem under the 5× N (34.3%) condition and in the leaf under the 0× N (22.2%) and 1× N (19.5%) conditions. However, an analogous analysis at the heading stage revealed significant (p < 0.05) increases in the root under the 0× N (14.1%) and 5× N (29.8%) conditions and in the spikelet under the 1× N (10.5%) and 5× N (12.4%) conditions, as well as significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the stem under the 5× N (40.8%) condition (Figure 5). An analysis of soluble carbohydrates at the tillering stage demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) increases in the root under the 5× N (14.5%) condition and in the stem under the 1× N (25.9%) condition, as well as significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the stem under the 5× N (34.3%) condition and in the leaf under the 0× N (29.3%) and 1× N (34.0%) conditions. An analogous analysis at the heading stage indicated significant (p < 0.05) increases in the stem under the 0.1× N (22.6%) and 5× N (119.3%) conditions and in the leaf under the 0× N (14.1%) condition (Figure 6). These results suggest that the overexpressing of the AMT1-3 gene altered carbon and nitrogen metabolic statuses in transgenic plants.
Ijms 16 09037 g005 1024
Figure 5. Soluble proteins analysis. The concentration of soluble proteins in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3-39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage (A) and the heading stage (B) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. Values are the mean ± s.d. from three biological replications. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Figure 5. Soluble proteins analysis. The concentration of soluble proteins in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3-39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage (A) and the heading stage (B) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. Values are the mean ± s.d. from three biological replications. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Ijms 16 09037 g005
Ijms 16 09037 g006a 1024Ijms 16 09037 g006b 1024
Figure 6. Soluble carbohydrates analysis. The concentration of soluble carbohydrates in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3–39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage (A) and the heading stage (B) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. Values are the mean ± s.d. from three biological replications. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Figure 6. Soluble carbohydrates analysis. The concentration of soluble carbohydrates in the roots, stems and leaves of the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (we renamed 3–39 as OX-AMT1-3) and wild type plants (WT) at the tillering stage (A) and the heading stage (B) under 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. Values are the mean ± s.d. from three biological replications. *, ** indicate the significant differences at the level of p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Ijms 16 09037 g006aIjms 16 09037 g006b

2.5. Effect of AMT1-3-Overexpressing on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolites

To study the individual metabolites involved in the carbon and nitrogen metabolic pathways, we analyzed the sugars, organic acids and free amino acids in the roots and leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants at the tillering stage under the 0× N and 5× N conditions. Figure 7 and supplementary Figure S2 displays the fold change that corresponds to the ratio of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants/wild-type plants calculated by the concentration of these individual metabolites. For the total sugars, total organic acids and total free amino acids, the results indicated similar patterns between the roots and leaves, where the total sugars and total free amino acids decreased and the total organic acids increased in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under the 0× N condition, and the total sugars and total organic acids decreased and the total free amino acids increased in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under the 5× N condition (data not shown). The fold change of individual sugars, organic acids and free amino acids in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared with wild-type plants indicates that AMT1-3 overexpressing yielded larger metabolite content variations in the roots than the leaves and under the 0× N condition than the 5× N condition. In AMT1-3-overexpressing plant leaves, when compared with wild-type plants, dramatic increases in xylitol (>21.9-fold) and succinate (>277.6-fold) and dramatic decreases in benzoic acid (<0.01-fold), arginine (<0.04-fold) and threonine (<0.03-fold) were observed under the 0×N condition. However, dramatic increases in threonine (>42.8-fold) and valine (>32.5-fold) and dramatic decrease in pyruvate (<0.07-fold) were observed under the 5× N condition (Figure 7 and Figure S2). In AMT1-3-overexpressing plant roots, when compared with wild-type plants, dramatic increases in inositol (>21.2-fold), ascorbic acid (>96.5-fold), aminobutyric acid (>526.6-fold) and cysteine (>20.0-fold) and dramatic decreases in arginine (<0.07-fold) and leucine (<0.001-fold) were observed under the 0× N condition. However, dramatic increases in benzoic acid (>14.0-fold), pyruvate (>684.7-fold), alanine (>63.3-fold) and leucine (>21.0-fold) and dramatic decreases in succinate (<0.10-fold), glutamine (<0.06-fold), aspartate (<0.05-fold) and asparagine (<0.005-fold) were observed under the 5× N condition (Figure 7 and Figure S2).
Ijms 16 09037 g007 1024
Figure 7. Metabolites analysis. Fold change corresponds to the ratio of the concentration of individual metabolites involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants relative to the wild type plants for the leaves and roots at the tillering stage under 0× N and 5× N conditions. Glc, glucose; Suc, sucrose; Fru, Fructose; F6P, Frutose-6-P; G6P, Glucose-6-P; G1P, Glucose-1-P; Gal, galactose; Ino, Inositol; AA, Ascorbic acid; Ara, Arabinose; Xyl, Xylitol; 3PG, 3-P-glycerate; PEP, P-enolpyruvate; Pyr, Pyruvate; Ace-CoA, acetyl-CoA; Cit, Citrate; Aco, Aconitase; KG, Ketoglutarate; Succ, Succinate; Fum, Fumarate; Mal, Malate; Oxa, oxaloacetate; Glu, Glutamate; Gln, Glutamine; Arg, Arginine; Pro, Proline; Orn, Ornithine; GABA, Aminobutyric; Asp, Aspartate; Asn, Asparagine; Ile, Isoleucine; Met, Methionine; Thr, Threonine; Ala, Alanine; Val, Valine; Leu, Leucine; Phe, Phenylalanine; Try, Tryptophan; Ser, Serine; Gly, Glycine; Cys, Cysteine. Red dots indicate increased metabolites and blue triangles indicate decreased metabolites.
Figure 7. Metabolites analysis. Fold change corresponds to the ratio of the concentration of individual metabolites involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants relative to the wild type plants for the leaves and roots at the tillering stage under 0× N and 5× N conditions. Glc, glucose; Suc, sucrose; Fru, Fructose; F6P, Frutose-6-P; G6P, Glucose-6-P; G1P, Glucose-1-P; Gal, galactose; Ino, Inositol; AA, Ascorbic acid; Ara, Arabinose; Xyl, Xylitol; 3PG, 3-P-glycerate; PEP, P-enolpyruvate; Pyr, Pyruvate; Ace-CoA, acetyl-CoA; Cit, Citrate; Aco, Aconitase; KG, Ketoglutarate; Succ, Succinate; Fum, Fumarate; Mal, Malate; Oxa, oxaloacetate; Glu, Glutamate; Gln, Glutamine; Arg, Arginine; Pro, Proline; Orn, Ornithine; GABA, Aminobutyric; Asp, Aspartate; Asn, Asparagine; Ile, Isoleucine; Met, Methionine; Thr, Threonine; Ala, Alanine; Val, Valine; Leu, Leucine; Phe, Phenylalanine; Try, Tryptophan; Ser, Serine; Gly, Glycine; Cys, Cysteine. Red dots indicate increased metabolites and blue triangles indicate decreased metabolites.
Ijms 16 09037 g007

2.6. Effect of AMT1-3-Overexpressing on Gene Expression Level

To analyze the impact of higher AMT1-3 mRNA levels on the expression patterns of key genes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism, the expression levels of genes encoding NRT (nitrate transporter), NR (nitrate reductase), GS (glutamine synthetase), GOGAT (glutamate synthase), RUBISCO (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) and PEPC (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase) were analyzed by q-RT PCR. Figure 8A displays these genes in the carbon and nitrogen metabolic pathways in rice plants. Supplementary Table S1 lists the fold changes that correspond to the ratio of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants/wild-type plants calculated by the relative gene expression level in roots and leaves at the tillering stage under the 0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N conditions. The results demonstrated that although AMT1-3 was constitutively overexpressing under the 35S promoter, these genes displayed distinct expression patterns under different nitrogen levels.
Under the 0× N condition, compared with wild-type plants, the roots of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed significantly decreased NTR1;1 and Fd-GOGAT1 levels (p < 0.01) and significantly increased NRT2 and NADH-GOGAT1 levels (p < 0.01), whereas the leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed significantly decreased levels for most of the genes assayed (NR1, NR2, GS1;1, GS2, Fd-GOGAT2, RUBISCO, PEPC1, PEPC2, PEPC3, PEPC7) (p < 0.05), except one gene (NADH-GOGAT2), which significantly increased (p < 0.01) (Figure 8B, Supplementary Table S1). Under the 0.1× N condition, compared with wild-type plants, the roots of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed significantly increased NRT1;2 and GS1;2 levels (p < 0.01) and significantly decreased NRT2, NR2, Fd-GOGAT1 and NADH-GOGAT1 levels (p < 0.05), which differed from the results obtained under the 0× N condition, where the leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed significant increases in most of the genes assayed (NR2, GS2, NADH-GOGAT2, RUBISCO, PEPC1, PEPC2, PEPC4, PEPC7) (p < 0.05), except one gene (NR1), which significantly decreased (p < 0.01) (Figure 8C, Supplementary Table S1). Under the 1× N condition, compared with wild-type plants, the roots of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed significantly increased NRT1;1, NR2, Fd-GOGAT1 and NADH-GOGAT1 levels (p < 0.05) and significantly decreased NRT2 and GS1;2 levels (p < 0.05), whereas the leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed similar results to those obtained under the 0.1× N condition, where most of the genes significantly increased (Fd-GOGAT2, NADH-GOGAT2, RUBISCO, PEPC2, PEPC3, PEPC4, PEPC7) (p < 0.05) , except the NR genes (NR1 and NR2), which significantly decreased (p < 0.05) (Figure 8D, Supplementary Table S1). Under the 5× N condition, the expression levels of the detected genes were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the roots and leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared with wild-type plants, except one gene (NRT2), which significantly decreased (p < 0.05) (Figure 8E, Table S1).
Ijms 16 09037 g008 1024
Figure 8. Gene expression analysis. Fold change corresponds to the ratio of the gene expression level in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants relative to the wild type plants. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the key genes involved in the carbon and nitrogen metabolic pathway in rice plants. NRT, nitrate transporter; NR, nitrate reductase; GS, glutamine synthetase; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; RUBISCO, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; PEPC, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. Prominent changes in the gene expression level in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared to wild type plants at the tillering stage under 0× N (B); 0.1× N (C); 1× N (D) and 5× N (E) conditions. Red and blue dots indicate up- and down-regulated genes, respectively.
Figure 8. Gene expression analysis. Fold change corresponds to the ratio of the gene expression level in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants relative to the wild type plants. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the key genes involved in the carbon and nitrogen metabolic pathway in rice plants. NRT, nitrate transporter; NR, nitrate reductase; GS, glutamine synthetase; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; RUBISCO, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; PEPC, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. Prominent changes in the gene expression level in the AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared to wild type plants at the tillering stage under 0× N (B); 0.1× N (C); 1× N (D) and 5× N (E) conditions. Red and blue dots indicate up- and down-regulated genes, respectively.
Ijms 16 09037 g008

3. Discussion

As OsAMT1 members, including OsAMT1-1, OsAMT1-2 and OsAMT1-3, have been characterized as high-affinity NH4+ transport genes in rice [13,35], we expected to obtain OsAMT1-overexpressing transgenic rice plants with higher ammonium uptake capacity, improved nitrogen use efficiency and a low nitrogen tolerance using the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method. Although we generated AMT1-2-, AMT1-3-overexpressing plants, we failed to obtain AMT1-1-overexpressing plants. Unexpectedly, AMT1-3-overexpressing plants displayed poor growth, but no significant differences between AMT1-2-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants were observed. In order to understand why poor growth phenotype exhibited in AMT1-3-overexpressing transgenic rice plants and evaluate the effect of AMT1-3 gene on the rice growth, nitrogen absorption and metabolism, we analyzed the growth phenotype, yield, carbon and nitrogen metabolic status and gene expression profiles of the OsAMT1-3-overexpressing rice and wild-type Zhonghua 11 under four different N levels (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N) at both tillering and heading stages in detail. Results showed that despite the higher AMT1-3 mRNA levels in transgenic plants, the root length, plant height, root and shoot biomass and yield were significantly decreased in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants compared with wild-type plants (Figure 2 and Figure 3; Table 2). The contents of total carbon and nitrogen, soluble proteins and carbohydrates, individual metabolites (such as sugars, organic acids, amino acids), the expression patterns of key genes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolic pathway changed significantly in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8; Table 3). The discordant of carbon and nitrogen metabolic status in transgenic plants caused by the OsAMT1-3 overexpressing may be the main reason for poor growth and yield in our investigation. Similar results were reported that overexpressing of OsAMT1-1 gene caused decreased shoot and root biomass in transgenic lines during seedling and early vegetative stage, especially when grown under high ammonium nutrition [53,54]. However, completely different results were reported by Ranathunge et al. [55] that transgenic rice lines overexpressing the OsAMT1-1 gene had higher plant growth rate and grain yield, especially under suboptimal NH4+ levels.
As we known, both carbon and nitrogen nutrients are essential for various cellular functions. Recently, cellular carbon and nitrogen metabolism was demonstrated to be tightly coordinated [8,9,10,11,56]. In addition to independent utilization, the coordination and optimal functioning of the metabolic pathways governing nitrogen and carbon assimilation in plants were demonstrated to be critical for plant growth and, ultimately, biomass accumulation and yield production [10,56]. Maintaining an appropriate balance or carbohydrate to nitrogen metabolite ratio in the cell, which is referred to as the “carbon/nitrogen balance”, is extremely important for regulating plant growth, development and production yield [8,9,11]. In our study, we found 4.6%–9.9% and 4.7%–15.5% decreases in AMT1-3-overexpressing plant leaf C and N content, respectively, which resulted in a higher (9.4%–11.7% increases) leaf C/N ratio in AMT1-3-overexpressing plant leaves (Table 3). Additionally, distinct changes between the soluble protein and carbohydrate concentrations were observed in AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Therefore, combined with our results, we hypothesized that the carbon and nitrogen metabolic imbalance caused by AMT1-3 overexpressing attributed to the poor growth and yield of transgenic plants.
To further study the impact of higher AMT1-3 mRNA levels at both the physiological and molecular level, we analyzed the individual carbon and nitrogen metabolites and the gene expression levels in the roots and leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants and wild-type plants. Consistent results of the metabolite concentrations and gene expression levels were showed in this study. Under the 0× N growth condition, given an almost complete lack of nitrogen (a residual amount of nitrogen may reside in water) in the nutrient solution, the nitrogen uptake, reduction and assimilation levels declined in leaves. The expression level of NRT1;1, which encodes a low-affinity NO3− transporter [57], was repressed, whereas NRT2, which encodes a high-affinity NO3− transporter [58], was induced in the root. Although the AMT1-3 gene was overexpressing under the 35S promoter, the NH4+ concentration in roots and leaves significantly decreased. Together with the lower NO3− uptake and transport by NRTs in roots and leaves, the expression levels of the genes (NR1, NR2, GS1;1, GS2, Fd-GOGAT1 and Fd-GOGAT2) involved in NO3− reduction and NH4+ assimilation were significantly decreased, which resulted in reduced total free amino acids and soluble proteins (Figure 5, Figure 7 and Figure 8). During NH4+ assimilation, numerous organic acids provided carbon skeletons to produce a variety of amino acids [59]; therefore, an accumulation of total organic acids may have been observed because of the decreased nitrogen assimilation status in leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (Figure 8). The expression levels of RUBISCO, PEPC1, PEPC2, PEPC3 and PEPC7 were decreased, which lead to a decline in total sugars and soluble carbohydrates in leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). Under the 5× N growth condition, given the much higher nitrogen content in the nutrient solution, higher levels of nitrogen uptake, reduction and assimilation were observed in both roots and leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants. The expression of low-affinity NO3− transporter genes (NRT1;1 and NRT1;2) [57] were induced, whereas the expression of the high-affinity NO3− transporter gene NRT2 [58] was repressed in the root, which resulted in more NO3− absorption and higher expression of genes (NR1, NR2, GS1;1, GS2, Fd-GOGAT1, Fd-GOGAT2 and NADH-GOGAT2) involved in NO3− reduction and NH4+ assimilation. As a result, total free amino acids and soluble proteins accumulated in leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants, which depleted total organic acids to provide carbon skeletons for amino acid production. This large consume of organic acids promoted the breakdown of sugars. Conversely, the expression levels of RUBISCO, PEPC1, PEPC2, PEPC3, PEPC4, PEPC6 and PEPC7 dramatically increased in leaves of AMT1-3-overexpressing plants to produce more carbohydrates (Figure 7).
Plants have evolved a complex profile of responses to cope with changes in soil nitrogen availability, which is mediated by a stringent control of expression and/or activity of proteins involved in nitrogen transport and assimilation [59]. Recent studies on nutrient effects in plants have focused on their potential roles as signaling molecules in addition to their roles as building blocks of organic matter or cofactors [60]. Nitrogen sensing appears to regulate a variety of physiological and developmental processes in plants [8,61]. For example, NO3− is a positive signal required for the induction of NO3− uptake and its reduction, and the metabolized products of NO3−, NH4+ and its assimilation products Glu and Gln are believed to exert negative effects on NO3− uptake and reduction [35,62,63,64,65]. Bacterial and fungal AMTs have been demonstrated to act as transceptors with dual functions as ammonium transporters and receptors that mediate ammonium-triggered changes in morphology or the transcription of target genes [66]. Plant AMTs may also be transceptors. For example, AMT1-3 can regulate lateral root branching in response to localized ammonium supplies [67]. More recent reports have demonstrated that OsAMT1-3 is expressed specifically in roots but repressed by nitrogen, which indicates that OsAMT1-3 participates not only in ammonium uptake but also in ammonium sensing in rice [14,35]. In this study, we expected to enhance ammonium uptake capacity in roots and to improve nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency and yield formation by overexpressing the AMT1-3 gene in rice. In contrast, our transgenic plants grew poorly and displayed a low yield production and an unbalanced carbon and nitrogen metabolic status (Figure 3; Table 2 and Table 3). We hypothesized that the AMT1-3 transcriptional level may act as a signal sensor to regulate carbon and nitrogen metabolism in rice. AMT1-3 is a high-affinity NH4+ transporter gene, its transcriptional level is mainly expressed in rice roots under low nitrogen in the environment and repressed with nitrogen supplementation [13,35] The high transcriptional level of AMT1-3 in our transgenic rice may mimic a nitrogen starvation signal in the environment and thus retard plant growth and development to ensure the plant can complete its entire life cycle. Recently, Gaur et al. validated OsAMT1-3 as a biomarker for detecting available nitrogen pools both inside cells and in the soils around the root [14]. Similar results were reported by Yuan et al. who attempted to increase the ammonium uptake capacity via ectopic expression of AMTs; however, this largely failed because their transport capacities are tightly regulated by ammonium [31]. In addition, excess ammonium intake deregulates cellular pH homeostasis and primary metabolism [68]. Therefore, plant roots repress ammonium uptake at elevated ammonium supplementation [49,64]. Furthermore, several published works have demonstrated that C-terminal phosphorylation can mediate intermonomeric trans-inhibition of ammonium transport in plant roots and that the allosteric regulation of transporter activities even extends to heteromeric AMT protein complexes in Arabidopsis [47,49]. Additionally, N-terminal cysteines were demonstrated to affect oligomer stability of the allosterically regulated ammonium transporter LeAMT1-1 [50]. Thence, the post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation of plant AMT cannot be ignored in further studies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Constructs and Transformation

“Ammonium transporter 1-3, rice” was used as the keywords to search the NCBI database (National Center for Biotechnology Information; Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and the complete OsAMT1-3 mRNA sequence (AF289479) was found. The full-length cDNA of OsAMT1-3 gene was amplified by PCR from the rice (Zhonghua 11, Japonica) genome using the forward primer 5'-CATAGGACTCCTGTGTTGAGCGCGCGTCGA-3' and reverse primer 5'-CTGCCTGCAGGTACTACTAGCTCAGCTCCT-3', which contained the enzyme site of BamHI and PstI, respectively. Then the cDNA fragment was ligated into the pCAMBIA 1301S vector which driven by CaMV (Cauliflower Mosaic Virus) 35S promoter. All the procedures of DNA manipulation were according to the standard molecular techniques [69,70]. The chimeric gene was transformed into Zhonghua 11, a japonica rice cultivar, to obtain the AMT1-3-overexpressing transgenic plants by the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation method [71].

4.2. Plant Growth Conditions

Seeds of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing rice germinated and were sowed in sand. The wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing seedlings with four leaves were transferred into the experimental pots under the 0× N (fertilized with 0.15 g P2O5 and 0.2 g K per kg soil), 0.1× N (fertilized with 0.02 g·N, 0.15 g P2O5 and 0.2 g·K·per·kg soil), 1× N (fertilized with 0.2 g N, 0.15 g P2O5 and 0.2 g K per kg soil) and 5× N (fertilized with 1 g·N, 0.15 g·P2O5 and 0.2 g K·per kg·soil) conditions. The yield and its components were analyzed at the mature stage. In addition, the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing seedlings with four leaves were transplanted hydroponically under the 0× N (without NH4NO3), 0.1× N (with 1/10 NH4NO3), 1× N (normal nutrient solution described by Yoshida et al. [72]) and 5× N (with 5-fold NH4NO3) conditions. The culture solution was refreshed every 3 days. At the tillering stage and the heading stage, the roots, stems and leaves were harvested for the growth phenotype, leaf SPAD value and photosynthetic capacity analysis; for the carbon and nitrogen content, soluble proteins and carbohydrates concentrations determination; for the metabolic profiling and gene expression investigation.

4.3. Northern Blot, Southern Blot and Gene Expression Analysis

Leaf total RNA of the wild type and transgenic plants was extracted using TriZol reagent (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), and 18 μg total RNA was used for Northern blotting to check whether the expression level of OsAMT1-3 gene was accumulated in transgenic plants. Hybridizations were performed with a 32P-labeled probe, which is a partial specific fragment of OsAMT1-3 gene. For Southern blot, genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of transgenic plants by the CTAB method, and 4 μg of genomic DNA was digested by BamHI. The DNA was then transferred to a Hybond N+ nylon membrane (Amersham, Buchinghamshire, UK) for Southern blot analysis. Hybridizations were performed with a P32-labeled partial DNA fragment of the hygromycin gene. The results were detected by autoradiography. All the experimental procedures were according to the instructions described by Sambrook et al. [69] previously. For q-RT PCR assay, both roots and leaves of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing plants were harvested from three biological replications under four different nitrogen conditions (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N) at the tillering stage. Total RNA was extracted using TriZol reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with DNaseI (Invitrogen) to avoid the genomic DNA contamination. The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Table S2 listed the gene-specific and actin primers. Q-RT PCR assay was then performed in an ABI PRISM 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

4.4. Nitrogen Uptake Assay

Seeds of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing rice germinated and were sowed in sand. At the 3-leaf stage, seedlings were transplanted hydroponically into the normal nutrient solution described by Yoshida et al. [72], except that 1.44 mM NH4NO3 was replaced by 2.88 mM NH4Cl. At the tillering stage, the NH4Cl in the nutrient solution was replaced with 15NH4Cl. Three biological replicated roots, stems and leaves were harvested at the time of 1, 3, 8 h, 1 and 3 days after 15N replacement. Then the 15N and total N content were analyzed by an isotope mass spectrometer (ANCA-MS, Europa Scientific, Crewe, UK) and by a C/N analyzer (Elementar, Vario MAX CN, Germany), respectively. Additionally, the total carbon and nitrogen content in roots, stems and leaves of wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under four different nitrogen conditions (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N) at the tillering stage were also determined by the C/N analyzer.

4.5. Physiological Parameters Determination

At the tillering stage, a chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502) was used to determine the SPAD value in flag leaves of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing plants; a Li-6400XT portable photosynthesis system (Li-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used to determine the photosynthetic parameters in flag leaves of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing plants. Ten randomly selected plants were determined. The results were the average value of the upper, middle and bottom portion of each flag leaf. For soluble proteins analysis, three biological replicated roots, stems and leaves of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under four different nitrogen conditions (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N) were harvested at both the tillering and heading stages. Fresh samples were ground and homogenized with the Trizma extraction buffer described by Melo et al. [73] on ice. After centrifuging (12,000× g, 20 min, 4 °C), the supernatant was used to measure the soluble protein concentration based on the protocols of Bradford [74] protein assay with the bovine serum albumin as a standard protein. For soluble carbohydrates analysis, three biological replicated roots, stems and leaves of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under four different nitrogen conditions (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N) were harvested at both the tillering and heading stages. All the samples were dried and ground to powder. The soluble carbohydrates were extracted with boiling water and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min. The supernatant was used to measure the soluble carbohydrate concentration according to the anthrone procedure [75,76]. For individual carbon and nitrogen metabolites analysis, three biological replicated roots and leaves of the wild type and AMT1-3-overexpressing plants under 0× N and 5× N conditions were harvested at the tillering stage. The individual metabolites involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism were determined using GC-TOF-MS method from 50 mg fresh samples. The sample extraction, the data pre-treatment and normalization, the alignments and the metabolite identification were performed as described by Kusano et al. [77,78] and Redestig et al. [79].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we obtained the AMT1-3-overexpressing transgenic rice plants and systematically analyzed the effect of AMT1-3 overexpressing on the rice growth, carbon-nitrogen metabolic status and gene expression profile at both the tillering and heading stages under four different nitrogen conditions (0× N, 0.1× N, 1× N and 5× N). Our results indicated that the overexpressing of AMT1-3 gene caused a poor growth and yield in transgenic plants. The unbalanced carbon-nitrogen metabolic status might be the main reason. However, how AMT1-3 overexpressing could lead to the carbon-nitrogen imbalance is still on going.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/05/9037/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31000932); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662013PY041) and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, the Ministry of Education of China (20100146120017). We thank Xingming Lian for providing the plant materials.

Author Contributions

Zhuqing Zhao and Hongmei Cai conceived and designed the experiments, Aili Bao and Zhijun Liang performed the experiments, Zhuqing Zhao and Hongmei Cai analyzed the data, Aili Bao and Zhijun Liang contributed reagents, Hongmei Cai wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lam, H.M.; Coschigano, K.T.; Oliveira, I.C.; Melo-Oliveira, R.; Coruzzi, G.M. The molecular-genetics of nitrogen assimilation into amino acids in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 1996, 47, 569–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tabuchi, M.; Abiko, T.; Yamaya, T. Assimilation of ammonium ions and reutilization of nitrogen in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2319–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Frink, C.R.; Waggoner, P.E.; Ausubel, J.H. Nitrogen fertilizer: Retrospect and prospect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Crawford, N.M.; Forde, B.G. Molecular and developmental biology of inorganic nitrogen nutrition. In The Arabidopsis Book; Meyerowitz, E., Somerville, C., Eds.; American Society of Plant Biologists: Rockville, MD, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Howitt, S.M.; Udvardi, M.K. Structure, function and regulation of ammonium transporters in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1465, 152–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bloom, A.J.; Sukrapanna, S.S.; Warner, R.L. Root respiration associated with ammonium and nitrate absorption and assimilation by barley. Plant Physiol. 1992, 99, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gazzarrini, S.; Lejay, L.; Gojon, A.; Ninnemann, O.; Frommer, W.B.; von Wirén, N. Three functional transporters for constitutive, diurnally regulated, and starvation-induced uptake of ammonium into Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 937–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Coruzzi, G.M.; Zhou, L. Carbon and nitrogen sensing and signaling in plants: Emerging “matrix effects”. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Martin, T.; Oswald, O.; Graham, I.A. Arabidopsis seedling growth, storage lipid mobilization and photosynthetic gene expression are regulated by carbon: Nitrogen availability. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Krapp, A.; Truong, H.N. Regulation of C/N interaction in model plant species. In Enhancing the Efficiency of Nitrogen Utilization in Plants; Goyal, S., Tischner, R., Basra, A., Eds.; Haworth Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 127–173. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zheng, Z. Carbon and nitrogen nutrient balance signaling in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nunes-Nesi, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Stitt, M. Metabolic and signaling aspects underpinning the regulation of plant carbon nitrogen interactions. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 973–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Loqué, D.; von Wirén, N. Regulatory levels for the transport of ammonium in plant roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1293–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gaur, V.S.; Singh, U.S.; Gupta, A.K.; Kumar, A. Understanding the differential nitrogen sensing mechanism in rice genotypes through expression analysis of high and low affinity ammonium transporter genes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 2233–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, M.Y.; Glass, A.; Shaff, J.E.; Kochian, L.V. Ammonium uptake by rice roots. Plant Physiol. 1994, 104, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Ludewig, U.; Wilken, S.; Wu, B.; Jost, W.; Obrdlik, P.; El Bakkoury, M.; Marini, A.-M.; André, B.; Hamacher, T.; Boles, E.; et al. Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of ammonium transporter-1 NH4+ uniporters. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 45603–45610. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bakouh, N.; Benjelloun, F.; Hulin, P.; Brouillard, F.; Edelman, A.; Chérif-Zahar, B.; Planelles, G. NH3 is involved in the NH4+ transport induced by the functional expression of the human RhC glycoprotein. J. Biol. Biochem. 2004, 279, 15975–15983. [Google Scholar]
  18. Khademi, S.; O’Connell, J.; Remis, J.; Robles-Colmenares, Y.; Miercke, L.J.; Stroud, R.M. Mechanism of ammonia transport by Amt/MEP/Rh: Structure of AmtB. Science 2004, 305, 1587–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ripoche, P.; Bertrand, O.; Gane, P.; Birkenmeier, C.; Colin, Y.; Cartron, J.-P. Human Rhesusassociated glycoprotein mediates facilitated transport of NH3 into red blood cells. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17222–17227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zheng, L.; Kostrewa, D.; Bernèche, S.; Winkler, F.K.; Li, X.-D. The mechanism of ammonia transport based on the crystal structure of AmtB of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17090–17095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Benjelloun, F.; Bakouh, N.; Fritsch, J.; Hulin, P.; Lipecka, J.; Edelman, A.; Planelles, G.; Thomas, S.R.; Chérif-Zahar, B. Expression of the human erythroid Rh glycoprotein (RhAG) enhances both NH3 and NH4+ transport in HeLa cells. Pflüg. Arch. 2005, 450, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mak, D.-O.D.; Dang, B.; Weiner, I.D.; Foskett, J.K.; Westhoff, C.M. Characterization of ammonia transport by the kidney Rh glycoproteins RhBG and RhCG. Am. J. Physiol. 2006, 290, F297–F305. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mayer, M.; Dynowski, M.; Ludewig, U. Ammonium ion transport by the AMT/Rh homologue LeAMT1;1. Biochem. J. 2006, 396, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fong, R.N.; Kim, K.S.; Yoshihara, C.; Inwood, W.B.; Kustu, S. The W148L substitution in the Escheria coli ammonium channel AmtB increase flux and indicates that the substrate is an ion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 18706–18711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ortiz-Ramirez, C.; Mora, S.I.; Trejo, J.; Pantoja, O. PvAMT1;1, a highly selective ammonium transporter that functions as H+/NH4+ symporter. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 31113–31122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Marini, A.M.; André, B. In vivo N-glycosylation of the mep2 high-affinity ammonium transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals an extracytosolic N-terminus. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 552–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Thomas, G.H.; Mullins, J.G.; Merrick, M. Membrane topology of the Mep/Amt family of ammonium transporters. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 37, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Litman, T.; Søgaard, R.; Zeuthen, T. Ammonia and urea permeability of mammalian aquaporins. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 327–358. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yuan, L.; Graff, L.; Loqué, D.; Kojima, S.; Tsuchiya, Y.N.; Takahashi, H.; von Wirén, N. AtAMT1;4, a pollen-specific high-affinity ammonium transporter of the plasma membrane in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Loqué, D.; Yuan, L.; Kojima, S.; Gojon, A.; Wirth, J.; Gazzarrini, S.; Ishiyama, K.; Takahashi, H.; von Wirén, N. Additive contribution of AMT1;1 and AMT1;3 to high-affinity ammonium uptake across the plasma membrane of nitrogen-deficient Arabidopsis roots. Plant J. 2006, 48, 522–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yuan, L.; Loqué, D.; Kojima, S.; Rauch, S.; Ishiyama, K.; Inoue, E.; Takahashi, H.; von Wirén, N. The organization of high-affinity ammonium uptake in Arabidopsis roots depends on the spatial arrangement and biochemical properties of AMT1-type transporters. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2636–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Engineer, C.B.; Kranz, R.G. Reciprocal leaf and root expression of AtAmt1.1 and root architectural changes in response to nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 236–250. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sohlenkamp, C.; Shelden, M.; Howitt, S.; Udvardi, M. Characterization of Arabidopsis AtAMT2, a novel ammonium transporter in plants. FEBS Lett. 2000, 467, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sohlenkamp, C.; Wood, C.C.; Roeb, G.W.; Udvardi, M.T. Characterization of Arabidopsis AtAMT2, a high-affinity ammonium transporter of the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1788–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sonoda, Y.; Ikeda, A.; Saiki, S.; von Wirén, N.; Yamaya, T.; Yamaguchi, J. Distinct expression and function of three ammonium transporter genes (OsAMT1;1–1;3) in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Marini, A.M.; Soussi-Boudekou, S.; Vissers, S.; André, B. A family of ammonium transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 4282–4293. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Suenaga, A.; Moriya, K.; Sonoda, Y.; Ikeda, A.; von Wirén, N.; Hayakawa, T.; Yamaguchi, J.; Yamaya, T. Constitutive expression of a novel-type ammonium transporter OsAMT2 in rice plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pearson, C.J.; Finnegan, P.M.; Schjoerring, J.K. Regulation of the high-affinity ammonium transporter (BnAMT1;2) in the leaves of Brassica napus by nitrogen status. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 49, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Salvemini, F.; Marini, A.M.; Riccio, A.; Patriarca, E.J.; Chiurazzi, M. Functional characterization of an ammonium transporter gene from Lotus japonicus. Gene 2001, 270, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Simon-Rosin, U.; Wood, C.; Udvardi, M.K. Molecular and cellular characterization of LjAMT2;1, ammonium transporter from the model legume Lotus japonicus. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 51, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lauter, F.R.; Ninnemann, O.; Bucher, M.; Riesmeier, J.W.; Frommer, W.B. Preferential expression of an ammonium transporter and of two putative nitrate transporters in root hairs of tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 8139–8144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Von WireÂn, N.; Gazzarrini, S.; Gojon, A.; Frommer, W.B. The molecular physiology of ammonium uptake and retrieval. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000, 3, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Becker, D.; Stahnke, R.; Fendrick, I.; Frommer, W.B.; Vanderleyden, J.; Kaiser, W.M.; Hedrich, R. Expression of the ammonium transporter gene LeAMT1;2 is induced in tomato roots upon association with N2 fixing bacteria. Planta 2002, 215, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yuan, L.; Loqué, D.; Ye, F.; Frommer, W.B.; von Wirén, N. Nitrogen-dependent posttranscriptional regulation of the ammonium transporter AtAMT1;1. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Loqué, D.; Lalonde, S.; Looger, L.L.; von Wirén, N.; Frommer, W.B. A cytosolic trans-activation domain essential for ammonium uptake. Nature 2007, 446, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Loqué, D.; Mora, S.I.; Andrade, S.L.A.; Pantoja, O.; Frommer, W.B. Pore mutations in ammonium transporter AMT1 with increased electrogenic ammonium transport activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 24988–24995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yuan, L.; Gu, R.; Xuan, Y.; Smith-Valle, E.; Loqué, D.; Frommer, W.B.; von Wirén, N. Allosteric regulation of transport activity by heterotrimerization of Arabidopsis ammonium transporter complexes in vivo. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 974–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Neuhäuser, B.; Dynowski, M.; Mayer, M.; Ludewig, U. Regulation of NH4+ transport by essential cross talk between AMT monomers through the carboxyl tails. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1651–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lanquar, V.; Loqué, D.; Hörmann, F.; Yuan, L.; Bohner, A.; Engelsberger, W.R.; Lalonde, S.; Schulze, W.X.; vonWirén, N.; Frommer, W.B. Feedback inhibition of ammonium uptake by a phosphodependent allosteric mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3610–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Graff, L.; Obrdlik, P.; Yuan, L.; Loqué, D.; Frommer, W.B.; von Wirén, N. N-terminal cysteines affect oligomer stability of the allosterically regulated ammonium transporter LeAMT1;1. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 1361–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Socolow, R. Nitrogen management and the future of food: Lessons from the management of energy and carbon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 6001–6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, F.; Cui, Z.; Fan, M.; Zhang, W.; Chen, X.; Jiang, R. Integrated soil–crop system management: Reducing environmental risk while increasing crop pro-ductivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. J. Environ. Qual. 2011, 40, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hoque, M.S.; Masle, J.; Udvardi, M.K.; Ryan, P.R.; Upadhyaya, N.M. Over-expression of the rice OsAMT1-1 gene increases ammonium uptake and content, but impairs growth and development of plants under high ammonium nutrition. Funct. Plant Biol. 2006, 33, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kumar, A.; Kaiser, B.N.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Functional characterization of OsAMT 1.1 overexpression lines of rice, Oryza sativa. Funct. Plant Biol. 2006, 33, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ranathunge, K.; EI-Kereamy, A.; Gidda, S.; Bi, Y.-M. OsAMT1;1 transgenic rice plants with enhanced NH4+ permeability show superior growth and higher yield under optimal and suboptimal NH4+ conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Krapp, A.; Ferrario-Méry, S.; Touraine, B. Nitrogen and signaling. In Advances in Photosynthesis; Foyer, C., Noctor, G., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lin, C.M.; Koh, S.; Stacey, G.; Yu, S.-M.; Lin, T.-Y.; Tsay, Y.F. Cloning and functional characterization of a constitutively expressed nitrate transporter gene, OsNRT1, from rice. Plant. Physiol. 2000, 122, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Araki, R.; Hasegawa, H. Expression of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genes involved in high-affinity nitrate transport during the period of nitrate induction. Breed. Sci. 2006, 56, 295–302. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lea, P.J.; Morot-Gaudry, J.F. Plant Nitrogen; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  60. Coruzzi, G.; Bush, D.R. Nitrogen and carbon nutrient and metabolite signaling in plants. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Foyer, C.H.; Parry, M.; Noctor, G. Markers and signals associated with nitrogen assimilation in higher plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Scheible, W.R.; GonzaÂles-Fontes, A.; Lauerer, M.; MuÈller-RoÈber, B.; Caboche, M.; Stitt, M. Nitrate acts as a signal to induce organic acid metabolism and repress starch metabolism in tobacco. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 783–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dzuibany, C.; Haupt, S.; Fock, H.; Biehler, K.; Migge, A.; Becker, T. Regulation of nitrate reductase transcript level by glutamine accumulating in the leaves of a ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase-deficient gluS mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, and by glutamine provided via the roots. Planta 1998, 20, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rawat, S.R.; Silim, S.N.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. AtAMT1gene expression and NH4+ uptake in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana: Evidence for regulation by root glutamine levels. Plant J. 1999, 19, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ferrario-MeÂry, S.; Masclaux, C.; Suzuki, A.; Valadier, M.H.; Hirel, B.; Foyer, C.H. Glutamine and a-ketoglutarate are metabolite signals involved in nitrate reductase gene transcription in untransformed and transformed tobacco plants deficient in ferredoxin-glutamine-a-ketoglutarate aminotransferase. Planta 2001, 213, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tremblay, P.L.; Hallenbeck, P.C. Of blood, brains and bacteria, the Amt/Rh transporter family: Emerging role of Amt as a unique microbial sensor. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 71, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lima, J.E.; Kojima, S.; Takahashi, H.; von Wirén, N. Ammonium triggers lateral root branching in Arabidopsis in an AMMONIUM TRANSPORTER1;3—Dependent manner. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3621–3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hachiya, T.; Watanabe, C.K.; Fujimoto, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Takahara, K.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Uchimiya, H.; Uesono, Y.; Terashima, I.; Noguchi, K. Nitrate addition alleviates ammonium toxicity without lessening ammonium accumulation, organic acid depletion and inorganic cation depletion in Arabidopsis thaliana shoots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  70. Maniatis, T.A.; Fritsch, E.F.; Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hiei, Y.; Ohta, S.; Komari, T.; Kumashiro, T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 1994, 6, 271–282. [Google Scholar]
  72. Yoshida, S.; Forno, D.A.; Cook, J.H.; Gomez, K.A. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice, 3rd eds; International Rice Research Institute: Manila, Philippine, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  73. Melo, P.M.; Lima, L.M.; Santos, I.M.; Carvalho, H.G.; Cullimore, J.V. Expression of the plastid-located glutamine synthetase of Medicago truncatula: Accumulation of the precursor in root nodules reveals an in vivo control at the level of protein import into plastids. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Morris, D.L. Quantitative determination of carbohydrates with Dreywood’s anthrone reagent. Science 1948, 107, 254–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Maness, N. Extraction and analysis of soluble carbohydrates. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 639, 341–370. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Kusano, M.; Fukushima, A.; Arita, M.; Jonsson, P.; Moritz, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Hayashi, N.; Tohge, T.; Saito, K. Unbiased characterization of genotype-dependent metabolic regulations by metabolomic approach in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst. Biol. 2007, 1, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kusano, M.; Fukushima, A.; Kobayashi, M.; Hayashi, N.; Jonsson, P.; Moritz, T.; Ebana, K.; Saito, K. Application of a metabolomic method combining one-dimensional and two-dimensional gas chromatographytime-of-flight/mass spectrometry to metabolic phenotyping of natural variants in rice. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007, 855, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Redestig, H.; Fukushima, A.; Stenlund, H.; Moritz, T.; Arita, M.; Saito, K.; Kusano, M. Compensation for systematic cross-contribution improves normalization of mass spectrometry based metabolomics data. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 7974–7980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bao, A.; Liang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Cai, H. Overexpressing of OsAMT1-3, a High Affinity Ammonium Transporter Gene, Modifies Rice Growth and Carbon-Nitrogen Metabolic Status. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 9037-9063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16059037

AMA Style

Bao A, Liang Z, Zhao Z, Cai H. Overexpressing of OsAMT1-3, a High Affinity Ammonium Transporter Gene, Modifies Rice Growth and Carbon-Nitrogen Metabolic Status. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(5):9037-9063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16059037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bao, Aili, Zhijun Liang, Zhuqing Zhao, and Hongmei Cai. 2015. "Overexpressing of OsAMT1-3, a High Affinity Ammonium Transporter Gene, Modifies Rice Growth and Carbon-Nitrogen Metabolic Status" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 5: 9037-9063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16059037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop