Next Article in Journal
Global Proteomic Analysis of Brain Tissues in Transient Ischemia Brain Damage in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Metacognition in Early Phase Psychosis: Toward Understanding Neural Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Are MTHFR C677T and MTRR A66G Polymorphisms Associated with Overweight/Obesity Risk? From a Case-Control to a Meta-Analysis of 30,327 Subjects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inflammatory Biomarkers as Differential Predictors of Antidepressant Response
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms160611864
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lack of Association between the TSPAN18 Gene and Schizophrenia Based on New Data from Han Chinese and a Meta-Analysis

by
Bao Zhang
1,
Da-Xu Li
2,
Ning Lu
3,
Qian-Rui Fan
1,
Wen-Hao Li
1 and
Zu-Fei Feng
1,*
1
College of Forensic Science, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
2
Department of Stomatology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
3
Department of Food and Biological Engineering, Henan Industry & Trade Vocational College, Zhengzhou 451191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(6), 11864-11872; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160611864
Submission received: 27 March 2015 / Revised: 18 May 2015 / Accepted: 19 May 2015 / Published: 26 May 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pathophysiology of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and New Therapeutic Targets)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tetraspanin-18 (TSPAN18) potentially plays a role in the calcium signaling that is associated with dopamine-induced cortical neuron apoptosis and is considered to be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia (SCZ). Furthermore, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified TSPAN18 as a possible susceptibility gene for SCZ. To validate these findings and reveal the effects of different inheritance models, seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the TSPAN18 gene were analyzed in 443 patients with SCZ and 628 controls of Han Chinese descent via the SNPscan method. Single SNP, genotype, and association analyses with different models (i.e., additive, dominant, and recessive models) were performed, and the published datasets (2062 cases and 2053 controls) were combined with our results to determine the inheritance effects of the SNPs on SCZ. We observed genotypes and allele distributions of TSPAN18 gene did not show any significant associations in the Han Chinese population based on our experimental and meta-analytical results. Our findings indicate that the TSPAN18 gene is unlikely to be a major susceptibility gene for schizophrenia in Han Chinese.

1. Introduction

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a common, severe, and debilitating mental disorder that is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors [1]. It has been reported that approximately 1% of the general population worldwide is affected by SCZ [2,3], and the morbidity among males is greater than among females [4]. Although heritability has been proven to play an important role in the development of SCZ [5], the exact etiology and genetic mechanisms of SCZ remain unclear.
Previously, many candidate genes, including NRG1 (encoding neuregulin 1), AUTS2 (autism susceptibility candidate 2), TSPAN8 (Tetraspanin-8), ZNF804A (zinc-finger protein 804A), among others, have been identified that might confer risk for schizophrenia [6,7,8,9]. In recent years, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of schizophrenia have identified several susceptibility loci, including ZKSCAN4 (zinc finger with KRAB and SCAN domains 4), NKAPL (NFκB activating protein-like), MIR137 (microRNA 137), WDR1 (WD repeat-containing protein 1), the ITIH3 (inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 3)–ITIH4 (inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain family, member 4) region and genes within the extended major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region [10,11,12]. Among these genes, TSPAN18 gene with three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs11038167, rs11038172, and rs835784) was reported to increase susceptibility to SCZ among Han Chinese [6]. Yuan et al. also found a significant association between rs835784 and SCZ [7]; however, others have failed to confirm this association [8]. Foremost, the genetic model based on previous studies is scarce. Given these controversial results regarding the association of the TSPAN18 gene with SCZ, the contribution of this gene to the etiology of the disorder requires further clarification.
Therefore, to examine the association of TSPAN18 with SCZ further, and to reveal the inheritance models for the association results, we conducted a case-control study involving cases from the Northwest Han Chinese population. Additionally, a meta-analysis of the SNPs of the examiner gene was performed across the published studies and the current research.

2. Results

2.1. Case-Control Study

Seven SNPs in the TSPAN18 gene were genotyped in 443 SCZ cases and 628 controls. No significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were found in either group. The frequencies of the alleles and genotypes of the seven SNPs are shown in Table 1. When all of the samples were considered, the allele frequencies and genotype association analysis for the patients with SCZ did not significantly differ from those of the control group. After the linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks were created, we found that seven SNPs exhibited very low R2 values (Figure 1), indicating that the calculations of the haplotype frequencies were not required.
Table
Table 1. Allele and genotype frequencies in the single SNP association analyses.
Table 1. Allele and genotype frequencies in the single SNP association analyses.
MakersAllele Freq (%)p-ValueOR a (95% CI)Genotype (N)HWE p-ValueModelOR b (95% CI)p-Value
SNPID
SNP1rs11038167ACAAACCC
SCZ43.556.50.9350.993 (0.835–1.181)792271370.238Add0.993 (0.838–1.177)0.936
CTR43.656.4134280214Dom1.155 (0.890–1.498)0.297
Rec0.800 (0.587–1.090)0.157
SNP2rs11038172AGAAAGGG
SCZ47.952.10.1661.130 (0.951–1.342)1141971320.954Add1.127 (0.950–1.337)0.171
CTR44.855.2120323185Dom0.984 (0.754–1.284)0.905
Rec1.450 (1.083–1.941)0.012
SNP3rs835990GAGGAGAA
SCZ25.274.80.7961.027 (0.841–1.254)311582480.461Add1.026 (0.843–1.249)0.799
CTR24.775.341224355Dom1.021 (0.797–1.307)0.870
Rec1.078 (0.665–1.749)0.760
SNP4rs704671ACAAACCC
SCZ37.462.60.2691.106 (0.925–1.323)582151700.324Add1.104 (0.925–1.318)0.274
CTR35.065.086268274Dom1.243 (0.970–1.593)0.086
Rec0.949 (0.664–1.358)0.776
SNP5rs73456450GAGGAGAA
SCZ2.2597.750.6670.883 (0.502–1.555)0204230.551Add0.889 (0.512–1.543)0.676
CTR2.2597.75228598Dom0.943 (0.528–1.682)0.841
Rec0.999
SNP6rs836001GCGGGCCC
SCZ25.375.70.7390.967 (0.794–1.178)391462580.065Add 0.969 (0.799–1.174)0.746
CTR25.975.143237343Dom0.878 (0.687–1.124)0.302
Rec1.302 (0.829–2.045)0.252
SNP7rs836002GCGGGCCC
SCZ24.275.80.7160.964 (0.789–1.177)301542590.621Add0.964 (0.970–1.176)0.718
CTR24.875.237238353Dom0.912 (0.713–1.166)0.463
Rec1.160 (0.705–1.908)0.558
Allele freq: allele frequency; SCZ: schizophrenia; CTR: control; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; a: OR refers to risk allele odds ratio in cases and controls; b: OR refers to risk genotype (Add: additive model; Dom: dominant model; Rec: recessive model) odds ratio in cases and controls.
Ijms 16 11864 g001 1024
Figure 1. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot of 7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the TSPAN18 (Tetraspanin-8) gene. The values in the squares indicate the pair-wise calculations of R2. The white squares with “0” indicate R2 = 0 (i.e., no LD between a pair of SNPs).
Figure 1. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot of 7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the TSPAN18 (Tetraspanin-8) gene. The values in the squares indicate the pair-wise calculations of R2. The white squares with “0” indicate R2 = 0 (i.e., no LD between a pair of SNPs).
Ijms 16 11864 g001

2.2. Meta-Analysis

For the meta-analysis, we combined and analyzed the data from two previous studies with those from the current study for totals of 2505 cases and 2681 controls [7,8]. A statistical summary of the meta-analysis of rs11038172 is shown in Figure 2.
Ijms 16 11864 g002 1024
Figure 2. Forest plot of the TSPAN18 rs11038172 polymorphism and Schizophrenia (SCZ) risk in the overall population.
Figure 2. Forest plot of the TSPAN18 rs11038172 polymorphism and Schizophrenia (SCZ) risk in the overall population.
Ijms 16 11864 g002
Heterogeneity was found to be present between the three studies (x2 = 3.67, p = 0.16, heterogeneity = 0.45); therefore, the fixed effects model was employed. The pooled OR and 95% CI values were calculated for the rs11038172 polymorphism of the TSPAN18 gene. The association between the rs11038172 polymorphism and SCZ risk in the recessive model showed p-value with 0.05 (pooled OR = 1.15, 95% CI, 1.00–1.32, p = 0.05).

3. Discussion

Tetraspanins are a highly conserved superfamily of four-transmembrane proteins that regulate diverse processes, such as cell signaling and adhesion, intracellular trafficking, viral infection and cancer [9]. The over-expressions of some tetraspanins have been demonstrated to be correlated with tumor progression [10,11]. Notably, studies found some tetraspanins to be acting in the nervous system during development and in the adult [12,13]. A previous study revealed that the TSPAN18 potentially exerted a role in calcium signaling [14]. Moreover, the calcium-signaling pathway that was associated with dopamine-induced cortical neuron apoptosis had been considered to be an important mechanism in SCZ pathogenesis [15]; Furthermore, TSPAN18 gene was reported to increase the susceptibility to SCZ among Han Chinese [6]. Yuan et al. also found a significant association between rs835784 and SCZ [7]; however, others have failed to confirm this association [8].
In our study, we observed genotypes and allele distributions of rs11038167 and rs11038172 SNPs in TSPAN18 gene did not show any significant associations in Chinese population, which was consistent with previous studies [7,8]. In addition, we performed the present meta-analysis on the combined data from two previous studies and those of the current study, which comprised a total of 2505 cases and 2681 controls. Our findings revealed that the TSPAN18 rs11038167 did not show any significant result (data not shown), and rs11038172 polymorphism showed p-value with 0.05 under recessive model (Figure 2). However, the recessive model based on our sample sizes could easily cause statistical type I error. Furthermore, the significant level was too weak in our meta-analysis result, implying there was no significant association between TSPAN18 polymorphism and schizophrenia susceptibility in Chinese Han population.
Although a previous study revealed that TSPAN18 was associated with SCZ, our experimental results and meta-analytical results do not support this finding. These inconsistent findings might have resulted from several factors. The frequencies of the “A” allele in rs11038167 in the controls from our studies, the studies of Yue and Yuan, and the European data from the NCBI were 0.448, 0.418, 0.430, and 0.991, respectively [6,7]. These differences in TSPAN18 indicated that subjects from different regions might exhibit genetic heterogeneity related to SCZ, and this supposition has also been supported by a meta-analysis [16]. Furthermore, one study reported that different genotyping methodologies might affect observed allele frequencies and thereby cause heterogeneity [17]. Additionally, the possibility of sampling error due to differences in the clinical diagnoses of SCZ cannot be entirely being excluded.
Our study also has several limitations, particularly the relatively small sample size of our experimental study, which limits the interpretation of the results. Furthermore, the population information in this study was acquired via self-reported questionnaires; therefore, we cannot fully exclude the possibility that inaccurate information was responsible for the observed association. Additionally, this study was performed at a single center (the three populations of the meta-analysis were all from China), which might potentially limit the generalizability of the findings.
In summary, the results of our experimental and meta-analyses are unlikely to explain genetic effects on the risk of schizophrenia. However, due to genetic heterogeneity, further studies utilizing greater numbers of subjects from different ethnic groups and should be performed to clarify this association further.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Subjects

Our samples were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. All patients were assigned by a standard procedure, and the diagnoses of SCZ were confirmed by two experienced psychiatrists using the Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). After undergoing a health examination, the controls were confirmed to be free of mental illness and matched with the patients in terms of sex, age, origin and educational level. Together, 443 patients (224 female and 219 male, mean age: 36.1 ± 10.2 years) and 628 unrelated controls (358 female and 270 male, mean age: 35.7 ± 9.7 years) of Northwestern Han Chinese descent were selected. All participants were volunteers, longstanding residents of the Shanxi province and provided written informed consent prior to inclusion. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center with project identification code (2011-054).

4.2. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Selection and Genotyping

In the current study, we conducted preliminary analysis using the HapMap data to select the transcription unit (including the 5'UTR, exons, and 3'UTR regions) of the TSPAN18 gene regions tagSNPs. The selected tagSNPs met the following criteria [18]. First, we examined tagSNPs in Haploview (v4.2) using the CHB (Chinese Han Beijing) population and a minor allele frequency cut-off (MAF) > 5%. Second, a MAF > 20% with pair-wise tagging and R2 > 0.8 [19] were used as cut-off for the selection of tagSNPs. Ultimately, seven SNPs (rs11038167, intron 2; rs11038172, intron 2; rs835990, intron 8; rs704671, exon10; rs73456450, exon10; rs836001, exon10; and rs836002, exon10) were selected for genotyping and analyses.
Human genomic DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Omiga, Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). All SNPs were genotyped with the SNPscan technique using SNPscan™ kit (Genesky Biotechnologies Inc., Shanghai, China) to design and determine the genotypes. This is a high-throughput and cost-saving SNP genotyping method based on double ligation and multiplex fluorescence PCR [20,21], and its high accuracy has been validated by many studies [22,23]. Five percent of the high DNA quality samples were randomly subjected to repeated analyses to guarantee the genotyping qualities. The average genotype call rate for all markers was 96%.

4.3. Statistical Analyses

The statistic power of our sample size was calculated with the G*Power program (Franz Faul, University Kiel, Kiel, Germany), according to Cohen’s method [24]. The sample size indicated a > 90% power to detect significant (a < 0.05) associations of alleles, genotypes and haplotypes at an effect size of 0.1 (which corresponds to a “weak” gene effect).
The genotype, allele and haplotype frequency differences between the cases and controls were calculated with chi-square test, which was also used to estimate whether the SNP genotypes deviated from the expected Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) values. Logistic regression analyses were selected to identify the SCZ-associated SNPs according to the odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and corresponding p-values. Moreover, the analyses of single SNPs were performed using the following multiple inheritance models: the additive, dominant model (the minor allele homozygotes plus the heterozygotes vs. the major allele homozygotes), and a recessive model (the minor allele homozygotes vs. the heterozygotes plus the major allele homozygotes).
Partitioning of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks was performed with Haploview 4.2 [25]. All statistical analyses were performed with PLINK (version 1.07) [26]. Differences were considered significant when the p value was <0.007 after Bonferroni correction (0.05/7).

4.4. Meta-Analysis

The studies included in the meta-analysis were identified using the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Pubmed databases using the following keywords “TSPAN18” and “Schizophrenia”. Data from two previously published papers were combined with ours’ from the present study [7,8]. We used Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5 to conduct case-control meta-analyses of independent samples under dominant and recessive models. Chi-squared tests based on Q tests and I2 were used to assess the heterogeneities between the individual studies [27,28,29]. When p < 0.05 (Q test) or I2 > 50%, the random effects model (the DerSimonian & Laird method) was employed [30]. Otherwise, the fixed effects model (the Mantel–Haenszel method) was used [31]. All p-values were two-tailed, and the significance level was 0.05.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31301949, No. 81302619), National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China (No. 2013M532056, No. 2013M532057), and National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of Shaanxi.

Author Contributions

The author is indebted to Bao Zhang for conception, design, drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content; to Da-Xu Li for acquisition of samples; to Ning Lu for English-polishing of this document; to Qian-Rui Fan and Wen-Hao Li analysis and interpretation of data; to Zu-Fei Feng acquisition of funding, and general supervision of the research group.

Conflicts of interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jia, P.; Wang, L.; Meltzer, H.Y.; Zhao, Z. Common variants conferring risk of schizophrenia: A pathway analysis of GWAS data. Schizophr. Res. 2010, 122, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yuan, A.; Yi, Z.; Wang, Q.; Sun, J.; Li, Z.; Du, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yu, T.; Fan, J.; Li, H.; et al. ANK3 as a risk gene for schizophrenia: New data in Han Chinese and meta analysis. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 159B, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ratta-Apha, W.; Hishimoto, A.; Mouri, K.; Shiroiwa, K.; Sasada, T.; Yoshida, M.; Supriyanto, I.; Ueno, Y.; Asano, M.; Shirakawa, O.; et al. Association analysis of the DISC1 gene with schizophrenia in the Japanese population and DISC1 immunoreactivity in the postmortem brain. Neurosci. Res. 2013, 77, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Saha, S.; Chant, D.; Welham, J.; McGrath, J. A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia. PLoS Med. 2005, 2, 413–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lichtenstein, P.; Yip, B.H.; Bjork, C.; Pawitan, Y.; Cannon, T.D.; Sullivan, P.F.; Hultman, C.M. Common genetic determinants of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Swedish families: A population-based study. Lancet 2009, 373, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yue, W.H.; Wang, H.F.; Sun, L.D.; Tang, F.L.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, H.X.; Li, W.Q.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.C.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for schizophrenia in Han Chinese at 11p11.2. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 1228–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yuan, J.; Jin, C.; Qin, H.D.; Wang, J.; Sha, W.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, J.; Li, J.; et al. Replication study confirms link between TSPAN18 mutation and schizophrenia in Han Chinese. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ma, L.; Tang, J.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Liu, W.; Wang, D.; Liu, X.H.; Gong, W.; Yao, Y.G.; Chen, X. Evaluating risk loci for schizophrenia distilled from genome-wide association studies in Han Chinese from Central China. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 638–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Garcia-Frigola, C.; Burgaya, F.; de Lecea, L.; Soriano, E. Pattern of expression of the tetraspanin Tspan-5 during brain development in the mouse. Mech. Dev. 2001, 106, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pan, S.J.; Wu, Y.B.; Cai, S.; Pan, Y.X.; Liu, W.; Bian, L.G.; Sun, B.; Sun, Q.F. Over-expression of tetraspanin 8 in malignant glioma regulates tumor cell progression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 458, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cheong, C.M.; Chow, A.W.; Fitter, S.; Hewett, D.R.; Martin, S.K.; Williams, S.A.; To, L.B.; Zannettino, A.C.; Vandyke, K. Tetraspanin 7 (TSPAN7) expression is upregulated in multiple myeloma patients and inhibits myeloma tumour development in vivo. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 332, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kopczynski, C.C.; Davis, G.W.; Goodman, C.S. A neural tetraspanin, encoded by late bloomer, that facilitates synapse formation. Science 1996, 271, 1867–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zemni, R.; Bienvenu, T.; Vinet, M.C.; Sefiani, A.; Carrie, A.; Billuart, P.; McDonell, N.; Couvert, P.; Francis, F.; Chafey, P.; et al. A new gene involved in X-linked mental retardation identified by analysis of an X;2 balanced translocation. Nat. Genet. 2000, 24, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Colombo, D. Characterization of the Tetraspanin Protein Tspan18. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, L.; Yang, H.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, C. Calcium-related signaling pathways contributed to dopamine-induced cortical neuron apoptosis. Neurochem. Int. 2011, 58, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jin, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Sha, W.; Wang, M.; Zhang, F.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Yu, S.; et al. Lack of association between MPC2 variants and schizophrenia in a replication study of Han Chinese. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 552, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yuan, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, Z.; Yu, S.; Jin, C. Lack of association between microRNA-137 SNP rs1625579 and schizophrenia in a replication study of Han Chinese. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2015, 290, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ke, X.; Cardon, L.R. Efficient selective screening of haplotype tag SNPs. Bioinformatics (Oxf.) 2003, 19, 287–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Bakker, P.I.; Yelensky, R.; Pe’er, I.; Gabriel, S.B.; Daly, M.J.; Altshuler, D. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 1217–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Du, W.; Cheng, J.; Ding, H.; Jiang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Yuan, H. A rapid method for simultaneous multi-gene mutation screening in children with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Genomics 2014, 104, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ren, Z.; Li, M.; Liu, R.; Wang, Y.; Gu, H. Interleukin 17A rs3819024 A>G polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma in a Chinese population. Biomarkers 2014, 19, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, X.; Yin, J.; Zheng, L.; Wang, L.; Shi, Y.; Tang, W.; Ding, G.; Liu, C.; Liu, R.; Chen, S.; et al. The variant interleukin 1f7 rs3811047 G>A was associated with a decreased risk of gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma in a Chinese Han population. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 3509–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yin, J.; Wang, X.; Wei, J.; Wang, L.; Shi, Y.; Zheng, L.; Tang, W.; Ding, G.; Liu, C.; Liu, R.; et al. Interleukin 12B rs3212227 T>G polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma in a Chinese population. Dis. Esophagus 2014, 28, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Barrett, J.C.; Fry, B.; Maller, J.; Daly, M.J. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lau, J.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Schmid, C.H. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann. Intern. Med. 1997, 127, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. DerSimonian, R.; Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials 1986, 7, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mantel, N.; Haenszel, W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1959, 22, 719–748. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, B.; Li, D.-X.; Lu, N.; Fan, Q.-R.; Li, W.-H.; Feng, Z.-F. Lack of Association between the TSPAN18 Gene and Schizophrenia Based on New Data from Han Chinese and a Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 11864-11872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160611864

AMA Style

Zhang B, Li D-X, Lu N, Fan Q-R, Li W-H, Feng Z-F. Lack of Association between the TSPAN18 Gene and Schizophrenia Based on New Data from Han Chinese and a Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(6):11864-11872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160611864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Bao, Da-Xu Li, Ning Lu, Qian-Rui Fan, Wen-Hao Li, and Zu-Fei Feng. 2015. "Lack of Association between the TSPAN18 Gene and Schizophrenia Based on New Data from Han Chinese and a Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 6: 11864-11872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160611864

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop