Next Article in Journal
Controlled Synthesis of Polyions of Heavy Main-Group Elements in Ionic Liquids
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Soy Isoflavones on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells Using a Global Metabolomic Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms17091442
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

De Novo Analysis of the Transcriptome of Meloidogyne enterolobii to Uncover Potential Target Genes for Biological Control

by
Xiangyang Li
1,2,†,
Dan Yang
1,†,
Junhai Niu
3,4,
Jianlong Zhao
1 and
Heng Jian
1,*
1
Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
3
Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou 571737, China
4
Hainan Engineering Technology Research Center for Tropical Ornamental Plant Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, Danzhou 571737, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(9), 1442; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091442
Submission received: 23 June 2016 / Revised: 19 August 2016 / Accepted: 24 August 2016 / Published: 1 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Meloidogyne enterolobii is one of the obligate biotrophic root-knot nematodes that has the ability to reproduce on many economically-important crops. We carried out de novo sequencing of the transcriptome of M. enterolobii using Roche GS FLX and obtained 408,663 good quality reads that were assembled into 8193 contigs and 31,860 singletons. We compared the transcripts in different nematodes that were potential targets for biological control. These included the transcripts that putatively coded for CAZymes, kinases, neuropeptide genes and secretory proteins and those that were involved in the RNAi pathway and immune signaling. Typically, 75 non-membrane secretory proteins with signal peptides secreted from esophageal gland cells were identified as putative effectors, three of which were preliminarily examined using a PVX (pGR107)-based high-throughput transient plant expression system in Nicotiana benthamiana (N. benthamiana). Results showed that these candidate proteins suppressed the programmed cell death (PCD) triggered by the pro-apoptosis protein BAX, and one protein also caused necrosis, suggesting that they might suppress plant immune responses to promote pathogenicity. In conclusion, the current study provides comprehensive insight into the transcriptome of M. enterolobii for the first time and lays a foundation for further investigation and biological control strategies.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Root-knot nematodes include over eighty species. These nematodes can negatively affect host plants in three main ways: damaging the plant roots, competing for nutrients and causing infection from other microbes induced by root damage [1]. Meloidogyne enterolobii (M. enterolobii) is an important obligate biotrophic plant parasite, infestation of which can lead to yellowing and stunting as a result of the nutritional and water stress caused by the physical root damage of nematode feeding [2]. M. enterolobii was first discovered in Danzhou, China, in 1983 [3] and has been spread and established in several continents and countries. M. enterolobii can infect a variety of host plants, including economic crops, such as cotton, pepper, tobacco and watermelon [2,4], and has become a potential threat to the agricultural economy in tropical and subtropical areas.
M. enterolobii has received great attention because of its ability to reproduce on a variety of host cultivars bred for nematode resistance. A PCR-based detection method can be used to identify M. enterolobii accurately [5]. Currently, there is no effective way of controlling M. enterolobii. Many efficient chemical-based nematicides have been banned or restricted for environmental and health concerns [6,7]. Biological control is considered an ideal alternative to the chemical methods, such as RNA interference (RNAi). However, detailed knowledge of the suitable target genes of M. enterolobii for such control strategies is still absent [8].
The interaction between plants and parasites is complicated and delicate. Plant parasitic nematodes have evolved to possess a variety of strategies that allow them to successfully infect and survive their hosts. For example, plant-parasitic nematodes can secrete numerous proteins, termed effectors, into their hosts that have various functions, including suppression of plant defenses and interference with plant signaling or hormone pathways to promote the formation of nematode feeding sites [9]. RNA sequencing is a high-throughput technique that can help identify the putative effectors and genes of the nematodes that are essential for their survival. To date, several nematodes have been successfully sequenced, including Pratylenchus coffeae [10], Meloidogyne graminicola [11], Pratylenchus thornei [12], Heterodera avenae [13] and Aphelenchoides besseyi [14], whereas transcriptome information of the more detrimental M. enterolobii is lacking. Therefore, the objective of the current research was to systematically study the transcriptome of M. enterolobii and to determine the possible mechanism of pathology of M. enterolobii in plants, as well as any important genes that might be used as RNAi targets for biological control. To achieve this objective, we collected the M. enterolobii, sequenced its transcriptome and carried out a series of bioinformatics analyses by comparing its transcriptome with those with known transcriptomic information.

2. Results

2.1. Assembly

Transcriptome sequencing of M. enterolobii generated 408,663 reads, for a total of 165,040,879 base pairs, with an average length of 403 bp, of which 355,760 reads were assembled into 8193 contigs with an average length of 1202 bp. Additionally, 31,860 singletons were obtained, with an average length of 380 bp. We obtained 8143 putative operons from the contigs and 29,403 from the singletons (Table 1). The lengths of most of the contigs and singletons were within the range of 500–600 bp. A detailed distribution is plotted in Figure 1.

2.2. GO Annotation

Only 4521 of the 37,186 putative operons were successfully annotated. The GO annotations were mainly distributed into fifty-three functional groups that are involved in molecular function, cell components and biochemical processes. The annotated operons were derived from 2082 contigs and 2439 singletons, which accounted for approximately 12% of the total. Only nine GO functional groups contained over 30% of the total transcripts. Namely, they were cell part (71%), cellular metabolic process (52%), membrane-bounded organelle (44%), ion binding (44%), primary metabolic process (41%), organic substance metabolic process (41%), single-organism cellular process (41%), nitrogen compound metabolic process (39%) and biosynthetic process (31%; Figure 2).
The ortholog analysis was carried out by comparing M. enterolobii with several nematodes that have available genetic information, including M. incognita, M. hapla, B. xylophilus, G. pallida and C. elegans. Of the genes pooled from these nematodes, we identified 17,966 orthologous families and 42,156 non-orthologous families. Approximately 51% of the operons (18,977) from M. enterolobii belonged to 11,926 orthologous families, of which 2826 gene families, including 6999 operons, were unique to M. enterolobii. Phylogenetic analysis of 1022 conserved single-copy orthologous families showed that M. enterolobii had the closest relationship with M. incognita, followed by M. hapla (Figure 3a). We subdivided these orthologous families into five groups (Figure 3b). We further analyzed the gene families that were not shared by all of these nematodes. The results showed that nine of the functional GO subgroups existed in the three Meloidogyne species; two GO subgroups existed in M. enterolobii and non-Meloidogyne species; one GO functional subgroup existed in both M. incognita and M. enterolobii; and eleven were in both M. hapla and M. enterolobii (Table S1). KEGG pathway analyses showed that eight pathways were unique to M. enterolobii, including tetracycline biosynthesis (KO_00253; KO, KEGG Ontology), β-lactam resistance (KO_00312), bisphenol degradation (KO_00363), peptidoglycan biosynthesis (KO_00550), atrazine degradation (KO_00791), steroid degradation (KO_00984), biosynthesis of the siderophore group nonribosomal peptides (KO_01053) and malaria (KO_05144) (Supplementary Materials Table S2). The number of pathways that were unique to M. incognita and M. hapla were five and one, respectively. Compared with the other nematodes, three pathways had the highest KOs in M. enterolobii, including nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes and glycerolipid metabolism. Forty-one pathways were missing, but existed in the other two nematodes (Table S2).

2.3. Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome of M. enterolobii

2.3.1. CAZymes

Searching CAZy and the dbCAN database for carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes), we found that M. enterolobii had only 249 CAZyme modules, which was the lowest among those of the six nematodes analyzed (Table S3). Typically, in the CAZyme modules, i.e., auxiliary activities, carbohydrate binding modules, carbohydrate esterase, glycoside hydrolase, glycosyltransferase and polysaccharide lyase, M. enterolobii had gene numbers to code for putative CAZymes as 2, 9, 3, 19, 31 and 1, respectively (Figure 4).

2.3.2. Kinases

We identified kinases from six nematodes using Kinannote and compared the differences between these nematodes. The results showed that M. enterolobii had protein kinases in all twelve types of kinases. Compared with other nematodes, M. enterolobii had fewer kinases in most groups of kinases; for example, M. enterolobii had only one “RGC” kinase and two “atypical” kinases, which indicated the low abundance of these enzymes in M. enterolobii (Table S4).

2.3.3. Neuropeptides

Examining the flp and nlp coded neuropeptides showed that M. enterolobii had nine flp and seven nlp orthologous genes to C. elegans. All of these gene transcripts were present in M. enterolobii and M. hapla, except that the flp-34 gene was absent in M. enterolobii (Table S5). However, when we further examined the genes that were involved in neurotransmitter biosynthesis, transport and metabolism, we found that the genes cha-1, ace-3 and tph-1 that were expressed in M. hapla were missing in M. enterolobii (Table S6).

2.3.4. RNAi Pathway

The transcripts that were coded for many orthologous proteins to C. elegans and participated in siRNA and/or miRNA pathways were also discovered in other nematodes. M. enterolobii had similar RNAi machinery to M. incognita, M. hapla and G. pallida. One exception was mut-7, which was only found in M. enterolobii and M. hapla, among all of these nematodes. Compared with C. elegans, we failed to find several genes expressed in other nematodes, including xpo-3, smg-5, rsd-2 and sid-1 (Table S7).

2.3.5. Immune Signaling

The immune pathways that were analyzed included TGF-β signaling, ERK MAPK signaling, P39 MAPK signaling and Toll signaling. Using C. elegans as the control, we found many orthologous genes from M. enterolobii, which were the same as in M. incognita (Table S8).

2.3.6. Secretory Proteins

It has been widely accepted that secretions produced by the amphids, hypodermis and esophageal glands of the nematodes involve complicated nematode-plant molecular interactions during the parasitism process. The protein effectors synthesized in esophageal gland cells (dorsal and subventral) and secreted through the stylet into plant cells play essential roles in the parasitism initiation and maintenance especially. From our analysis results, M. enterolobii was found to have 1464 putative secretory proteins; M. incognita contained as many as 1706; and M. hapla only contained 1108 putative secretory proteins. We found 701 predicted secretory proteins that belonged to M. enterolobii, 165 belonged to M. enterolobii and M. incognita; and 229 belonged to M. enterolobii and M. hapla; of which, 679 were conserved in all three species (Figure 5). Blasting the 1464 putative proteins from M. enterolobii showed that 497 of them had orthologous sequences. GO annotations of these proteins from M. enterolobii showed that the main functions included cellular parts, i.e., “endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment”, “vacuole”, “cell periphery”, “extracellular region” and protein folding and proteolysis. In addition to CAZymes, we also identified numerous potential genes that encode secretions; some of which belonged to known parasitic effector homologues that play roles in different key processes, such as: (I) encoding putative chemotaxis participators for host-seeking and location, amphid protein map-1, SXP/RAL-2; (II) encoding plant reprogramming regulators for feeding cells formation and maintenance, expansin (EXP), cellulose-binding proteins (CBP); (III) encoding immunomodulatory components for protecting nematodes against plant defense response, chorismate mutase (CM), fatty acid and retinol binding protein (FAR), venom allergen-like protein (VAP), annexins, etc. Moreover, we also identified some esophageal gland cell secretory proteins that were conserved in plant parasitic nematodes (PPNs), but without functional characterization yet (Table S9).

2.4. Expression of the Candidate Genes Suppressed BAX-Induced Cell Death in N. benthamiana

Comparing the putative proteins from M. enterolobii with the effectors reported, we found 241 transcripts that could be translated into effectors. These putative effectors were involved in cell wall degradation, proteinase, defense or suppression of the host plant immune system, participation in the signaling of the host plants and other similar functions. Of the 241 putative effectors, 75 were biosynthesized from the esophageal gland cells (Table S9). Three candidate secretory proteins were successfully cloned for further analysis. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 expressing vector pGR107-candidate gene or buffer as a control was injected into the leaves of N. benthamiana 24 h before the injection of genes expressing pGR107-BAX. The results showed that the No. 5 and No. 10 proteins could effectively suppress BAX-induced programmed cell death (PCD). Interestingly, the No. 8 protein not only caused necrosis, but also suppressed BAX-induced PCD (Figure 6). The detailed homology information of these three protein sequences is shown in Figure S1.

3. Discussion

Our study provides the first transcriptome data of M. enterolobii, a pest of economic crop plants. To find out the potential target genes for biological control, we analyzed the transcripts that putatively coded for CAZymes, kinases, neuropeptide genes and secretory proteins and those that were involved in the RNAi pathway and immune signaling, all of which were essential for the successful survival of M. enterolobii in its host plants. GO annotation showed that the genes expressed were mainly involved in the structural components and basic metabolic reactions that support their living. The current research studied the nematodes from various stages; therefore, the transcripts that we obtained could provide a generally complete picture of the gene expression pattern of M. enterolobii.
We compared the transcripts obtained from M. enterolobii with those from five other well-studied nematodes: C. elegans, M. incognita, M. hapla, G. pallida and B. xylophilus. All of them shared most of their transcriptome information. As expected, M. enterolobii had the closest evolutionary relationship with M. incognita; next was M. hapla; and M. enterolobii was evolutionally farthest from C. elegans. We analyzed the enriched GO annotated proteins shared by these nematodes. Compared with M. incognita, M. enterolobii had a similar response to endogenous stimuli, forebrain development and cranial nerve development. The only GO terms shared by M. hapla and M. enterolobii were enriched in nerve development, B cell activation, brain development, neuron-neuron synaptic transmission, response to cocaine, cation channel activity, response to organic cyclic compounds, learning and responses to ammonium ion. These functions facilitated the survival of these nematodes in reaction to the host plants. Generally, M. enterolobii had similar KOs compared with M. hapla, although M. enterolobii was closest to M. incognita evolutionally. However, M. enterolobii had its unique expression pattern. For example, the eight unique pathways of M. enterolobii (biosynthesis of tetracycline, β-lactam resistance, bisphenol degradation, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, atrazine degradation, steroid degradation, biosynthesis of siderophore group nonribosomal peptides and malaria) may endow M. incognita with more competitive ability in host cells. What is worth special mention is malaria (KO_05144), which suggested that M. enterolobii may have evolved to have homologous elements involved in the KO_05144 pathway of human malaria parasites, providing clues to reveal the genetic and pathologic mechanism for its strong parasitism ability. Furthermore, M. incognita (20,365) had fewer genes expressed overall than did M. enterolobii (37,186), but more than M. hapla (14,420). This may be due to differences in their living conditions and the evolutionary stress during environmental adaptation.
CAZymes are enzymes that are involved in the synthesis, metabolism and transport of carbohydrates. The first important step for M. enterolobii to parasitize a host plant is to destroy the plant cell walls. Glycoside hydrolases are enzymes that can degrade cellulose, which is the main component of plant cell walls. We found 19 putative glycoside hydrolases expressed in M. enterolobii, of which 10 putative glycoside hydrolases (GH13, GH18, GH20, GH25, GH30, GH31, GH35, GH37, GH38 and GH84) were expressed in all six nematodes. It should be noted that these genes were expressed in both free-living nematodes (C. elegans) and parasitic nematodes, which is possible because GH genes can be acquired via horizontal gene transfer [15].
Protein kinases are another group of influential enzymes that participate in nearly every biochemical reaction. The current research showed that M. enterolobii had fewer kinases than C. elegans did, especially in the RGC and atypical categories. RGC is an abbreviation for receptor guanylate cyclase, which plays an important role in neuronal signaling systems [16]. The only RGC found in M. enterolobii was isotig04408, which was annotated as having multiple functions, such as guanylate cyclase activity, protein tyrosine kinase activity and ATP binding.
Neuropeptides play an essential role in chemoreception in nematodes. To date, 113 genes coding for 250 neuropeptides have been identified in C. elegans [17]. Our data showed that M. enterolobii and other parasitic root nematodes had many fewer flp and nlp genes expressed than did C. elegans. However, these neuropeptides may still play an important role in their life cycle. For example, the inactivation of flp-1 can led to many behavioral dysfunctions [18,19].
In the recent ten years, RNAi has been widely employed in functional genomic research on PPNs and has also been perceived as an effective strategy to engineer PPN resistance for host plants. Therefore, identification of the components known to be involved in the RNAi pathway in M. enterolobii will be helpful to perform RNAi experiments effectively for this nematode. Different from C. elegans, information is limited on the RNAi pathways of these parasitic nematodes. However, we found that most of the genes involved in the RNAi pathway were conserved in these parasitic nematodes, indicating their essential roles in the living cycle of these nematodes. For example, the genes of RNaseIII (e.g., drsh-1), RNA helicase (e.g., drh-3), export protein (e.g., xpo-1) and amplification factors (e.g., ego-1) were shown to be expressed in all of the nematodes analyzed.
M. enterolobii has a unique immune system in that it avoids other pathogens. For example, M. enterolobii can avoid attack from Pasteuria penetrans, which is effective for infecting other nematodes [20,21,22]. In the current study, we analyzed the genes that were involved in immune responses of these nematodes by comparison with C. elegans, a well-studied nematode model [23,24]. In the TGF-β signaling pathway, dbl-1 gene was expressed in all six nematodes that were analyzed. The DBL-1 pathway must work with several factors, including the SMA-2/SMA-3/SMA-4 complex and SMA-9 [24]. Any factor missing in the SMA-2/SMA-3/SMA-4 complex will disrupt the downstream cascade [25]. Our data showed that M. enterolobii, M. incognito and B. xylophilus had sma-2, sma-3 and sma-4 expressed, whereas M. hapla and G. pallida seemed not to be capable of forming the SMA-2/SMA-3/SMA-4 complex, which might lead to the disruption of this pathway.
Different from other nematodes, M. enterolobii can overcome the anti-parasitic genes that are effective in prevention in other nematodes, including the tomato Mi resistance gene and pepper N resistance gene. In addition, M. enterolobii could not be infected by Pasteuria penetrans, which has potential as a biocontrol agent for Meloidogyne species. Therefore, M. enterolobii is considered to be a great threat to these crops. Our transcriptome data displayed the unique gene expression pattern of M. enterolobii compared with other nematodes. This information may work as a guideline to determine key points (e.g., effectors) for further biological control of these parasites. Despite different lifestyles, the nematodes shared common effectors that enable them to invade root tissues and suppress host immune responses for survival. Esophageal gland cells, including one dorsal gland cell and two subventral gland cells [26], are important organs for the nematodes to synthesize and secrete effectors to interact with the host plants [26,27]. Therefore, identifying the putative proteins at this position has become a widely-used strategy to identify the potential effectors [11,12,13,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. To date, many important effectors secreted from the nematodes have been identified [9,11]. The transcriptomes of many plant parasites have been analyzed using mRNA sequencing, which is an effective technique to discover new effectors [11,12,13]. Jacob et al. used signal peptides and transmembranes as the standard to screen out 156 genes that code for putative effectors [33]. Following these standards, we identified 701 putative secretory proteins that were specifically secreted from esophageal gland cells of M. enterolobii. These were many more than those from the other two Meloidogyne species, which partly explained why M. enterolobii can infect a wide spectrum of host plants.
The pro-apoptotic mouse protein BAX is a death-promoting member of the Bcl-2 family that is involved in programmed cell death (PCD). Because of the common mechanism between the animal and plant cell death program, BAX can also trigger plant PCD (BT-PCD), physiologically resembling that associated with the hypersensitive response [36], so the ability to suppress BT-PCD has proven to be exploited as a valuable initial screening method for pathogen effectors capable of suppressing defense-associated PCD [37,38]. The PPNs’ effectors, which function as immune suppressors, have been postulated to play a decisive role because the successful parasitism was heavily determined by whether or not nematodes and feeding cells keep on surviving without injuries from the plant immune system [39,40,41,42]. In this study, we tested three candidate genes (No. 5, No. 8, No. 10) because they are conserved in Meloidogyne genus, and their homologues had been suggested to be exclusively expressed in esophageal gland cells of M. incognita by in situ mRNA hybridization [43]. Therefore, it is still logical to deduce that they may be essential genes encoding secretory proteins during the nematode parasitism. In our infiltration assay, No. 5 and No. 10 consistently suppressed BT-PCD, while infiltrating with BAX alone at the same time could initiate a typical BT-PCD reaction (Figure 6), suggesting that No. 5 and No. 10 might be immune modular effectors able to target the common PCD pathways to suppress cell death. Differently, No. 8 protein was able to cause necrosis. This indicated that M. enterolobii had multiple strategies to neutralize host immune reactions. To understand their regulation patterns, further research is still needed to confirm the molecular functions of these effectors.
By analyzing the transcriptome data of M. enterolobii, we noticed that these parasitic nematodes showed very similar gene expression patterns. Interestingly, these parasitic nematodes missed a variety of genes that were readily expressed in C. elegans, which is a free-living nematode. This might be because C. elegans was better armed to adapt to the tough free-living environment, whereas the parasitic nematodes were more focused on the defense avoidance of the host plants. It should be noted that the present bioinformation analysis was performed based on M. enterolobii expressed sequence tag sequences, which may have led to misidentification because of the potential limitations in transcriptomic coverage and assembly facticity. In the future, the comparative bioinformatics performed on deep/full-length transcriptome or genome sequences, combined with genes’ functional analysis, will facilitate the comprehensive and reliable identification for M. enterolobii-specific and Meloidogyne conserved genes. Either way, our extensive analyses exposed the specific and conserved genes that are essential to M. enterolobii parasitism or survival, and these genes represent the promising targets for novel efficient biocontrol strategies that are friendlier to the environment.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Treatment

M. enterolobii stain “MeLD1” was collected from infested tomato roots growing in Ledong, China, whose genetic homogeneity had been identified previously by microscopical observation of perineal patterns [44,45] and by molecular diagnosis using species-specific sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers [5,46]. The genetically homogenous population was multiplied on the susceptible tomato cultivar (Lycopersicum esculentum cv. “Baiguo”) in axenic cultures starting from a single-egg mass in a greenhouse of the nematode laboratory in China Agricultural University. Egg masses on root galls were handpicked and hatched over sterile water at 25 °C on improved Baermann pans for 72 h to yield preparasitic second-stage juveniles (pre-J2s). Mixed parasitic stages of M. enterolobii were collected from infected tomato roots by root blending and sieving as previous described [47], then the nematodes of the parasitic J2 (para-J2), J3 and adult female stages were separated under microscope based on their morphology differences. All of the collected stages of nematode were frozen (−80 °C) for RNA isolation.

4.2. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis and Sequencing

RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A Micropoly (A) Purist TM mRNA purification kit (Ambion, Shanghai, China) was used to purify the mRNA under the manufacturer’s instructions. The mRNA from M. enterolobii at mixed stages was treated with DNase I at 37 °C for 25 min to remove any residual DNA. The cDNA was then synthesized using SuperScriptTM III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 42 °C for 1 h. The synthesized cDNA was fragmented into 300–800 bp using an ultrasound sonicator (Fisher, Shanghai, China) and purified using Ampure beads (Agencourt, Suzhou, China). The purified cDNA was prepared with a GS DNA Library Preparation kit (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany), amplified using the GS emPCR kit (Roche Applied Science) and then sequenced in a Roche 454 Genome Sequencer FLX machine.

4.3. Assembly and GO Annotation

The reads were assembled using Newbler 2.7 (454 Life sciences, Branford, CT, USA) at the default setting. Genes and associated ORFs were predicted using GetORF from the EMBOSS tool kit and then BLASTed against the Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL databases at an E value < 1 × 10−5. The functional annotation of all predicted proteins of M. enterolobii was performed with Blast2GO [48]. The GO term enrichment analysis was performed using Ontologizer [49] with the term-to-term or parent-child-intersection approach and Bonferroni correction.

4.4. Phylogenetic and Comparative Analysis of Orthologous Families

Based on sequence similarity, orthologous families were constructed for predicted proteins of Meloidogyne enterolobii, Meloidogyne hapla, Meloidogyne incognita, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Globodera pallida and Caenorhabditis elegans by orthAgogue [50] at the default setting. Protein multiple alignments were carried out using MUSCLE [51] for each of 1022 single-copy ortholog families extracted from the orthAgogue result. The resulting alignments were concatenated into one combined alignment. Poorly-aligned regions were removed by trimAl [52]. The phylogenomic tree was inferred by MEGA6 [53] using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS) (Available online: http://www.genome.jp/tools/kaas/) with the BBH (bi-directional best hit) method, we mapped the pathways of the three evolutionarily-closest nematodes, i.e., M. enterolobii, M. hapla and M. incognita, and compared the differences in KEGG Ontology (KO) numbers.

4.5. Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome

We compared the transcripts in different nematodes that putatively coded for CAZymes, kinases, neuropeptide genes and secretory proteins and those that were involved in the RNAi pathway and immune signaling. Genes encoding putative carbohydrate-active enzymes were identified using the hmmscan program in the HMMER 3 package [54] to search for the predicted proteomes with the family-specific HMM profiles of CAZymes downloaded from the dbCAN database (Available online: http://csbl.bmb.uga.edu/dbCAN/download/). Kinomes were identified using Kinannote [55]. The neuropeptide-like protein (NLP) and FMRF amide-like peptide (FLP) were identified using BLASTp searches with the known sequences as queries from Meloidogyne enterolobii, Meloidogyne hapla, Meloidogyne incognita, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Globodera pallida and Caenorhabditis elegans [56,57,58,59]. RNAi pathway and immune signaling were identified based on the orthAgogue results and the known genes in C. elegans. Putative effectors were predicted from the secretory proteins based on two conditions (having signal peptides and not being a membrane protein), as previously reported using SignaIP 4.1 [60] and TMHMM [33].

4.6. Functional Verification of Three Putative Effectors

Of the predicted 75 esophageal gland secretory proteins, 3 proteins with signal peptides were cloned. These putative proteins were amplified using the primers listed in Table 1. The PCR product was constructed into the PVX vector pGR107 with a flag-tag fused at the N-terminal and transformed into A. tumefaciens GV3101. The verification method was modified from Wang et al. [61]. Briefly, Agrobacterium strain GV3101 harboring different constructs was grown in liquid LB medium with suitable antibiotics at 28 °C in a shaking incubator at 200 rpm. After 16 h incubation, the bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 5000× g for 5 min, washed with 10 mM MgCl2 three times and suspended in infiltration medium (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6 and 100 mM acetosyringone) to an OD600 of 0.4 and kept at room temperature for 1–3 h prior to infiltration into the four-week-old N. benthamiana leaves. The cultured A. tumefaciens cells carrying candidate genes and GFP were initially infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana. After 24 h, the same infiltration site was then challenged with A. tumefaciens cells carrying the BAX. The leaves were boiled six days later in 95% ethanol to clear the background for photographing. All experiments were repeated.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/9/1442/s1.

Acknowledgments

The current research was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2013CB127501), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31272021, 31571987), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest, China (No. 20113018), and the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (No. 2015NX005). Thanks to Yuanchao Wang lab from Nanjing Agricultural University and Bingyan Xie from the Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences who kindly provided the pGR107-flag-tag vector, pGR107-eGFP and pGR107-Bax vectors.

Author Contributions

Xiangyang Li, Dan Yang and Heng Jian conceived of and designed the experiments. Xiangyang Li, Dan Yang and Jianlong Zhao performed the experiments. Xiangyang Li, Junhai Niu and Dan Yang analyzed the data. Heng Jian contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. Xiangyang Li wrote the paper, and Junhai Niu and Heng Jian revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, S. Pathogenic Effects of Pratylenchus-Zeae on Sugarcane, Phytopathology, 1959; The American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1959; p. 543. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ramírez-Suárez, A.; Rosas-Hernández, L.; Alcasio-Rangel, S.; Powers, T. First report of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii parasitizing watermelon from Veracruz, Mexico. Plant Dis. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, B.; Eisenback, J. Meloidogyne enterolobii n. sp. (Meloidogynidae), a root-knot nematode parasitizing pacara earpod tree in China. J. Nematol. 1983, 15, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Brito, J.; Powers, T.O.; Mullin, P.; Inserra, R.; Dickson, D. Morphological and molecular characterization of Meloidogyne mayaguensis isolates from Florida. J. Nematol. 2004, 36, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Long, H.; Liu, H.; Xu, J. Development of a pcr diagnostic for the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 2006, 36, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
  6. Civerolo, E. Alternatives to Methyl Bromide: Assessment of Research Needs and Priorities: Proceedings from the Usda Workshop on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide; US Department of Agriculture; Agriculture Research Service: Arlington, VA, USA, 1993.
  7. Chitwood, D.J. Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control 1. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2002, 40, 221–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Williamson, V.M.; Gleason, C.A. Plant–nematode interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mitchum, M.G.; Hussey, R.S.; Baum, T.J.; Wang, X.; Elling, A.A.; Wubben, M.; Davis, E.L. Nematode effector proteins: An emerging paradigm of parasitism. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 879–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Haegeman, A.; Joseph, S.; Gheysen, G. Analysis of the transcriptome of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus coffeae generated by 454 sequencing technology. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2011, 178, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Haegeman, A.; Bauters, L.; Kyndt, T.; Rahman, M.M.; Gheysen, G. Identification of candidate effector genes in the transcriptome of the rice root knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nicol, P.; Gill, R.; Fosu-Nyarko, J.; Jones, M.G. De novo analysis and functional classification of the transcriptome of the root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus thornei, after 454 GS FLX sequencing. Int. J. Parasitol. 2012, 42, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kumar, M.; Gantasala, N.P.; Roychowdhury, T.; Thakur, P.K.; Banakar, P.; Shukla, R.N.; Jones, M.G.; Rao, U. De novo transcriptome sequencing and analysis of the cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, F.; Li, D.; Wang, Z.; Dong, A.; Liu, L.; Wang, B.; Chen, Q.; Liu, X. Transcriptomic analysis of the rice white tip nematode, Aphelenchoides besseyi (nematoda: Aphelenchoididae). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Palomares-Rius, J.E.; Hirooka, Y.; Tsai, I.J.; Masuya, H.; Hino, A.; Kanzaki, N.; Jones, J.T.; Kikuchi, T. Distribution and evolution of glycoside hydrolase family 45 cellulases in nematodes and fungi. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Morton, D.B. Invertebrates yield a plethora of atypical guanylyl cyclases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2004, 29, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.; Nelson, L.S.; Kim, K.; Nathoo, A.; Hart, A.C. Neuropeptide gene families in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 897, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nelson, L.S.; Rosoff, M.L.; Li, C. Disruption of a neuropeptide gene, flp-1, causes multiple behavioral defects in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 1998, 281, 1686–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Waggoner, L.E.; Hardaker, L.A.; Golik, S.; Schafer, W.R. Effect of a neuropeptide gene on behavioral states in Caenorhabditis elegans egg-laying. Genetics 2000, 154, 1181–1192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Fargette, M.; Phillips, M.; Blok, V.C.; Waugh, R.; Trudgill, D. An RFLP study of relationships between species, populations and resistance-breaking lines of tropical species of Meloidogyne. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 1996, 19, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  21. Brito, J.; Stanley, J.; Cetintas, R.; Powers, T.; Inserra, R.; McAvoy, G.; Mendes, M.; Crow, B.; Dickson, D. Identification and host preference of Meloidogyne mayaguensis and other root-knot nematodes from Florida, and their susceptibility to Pasteuria Penetrans. J. Nematol. 2004, 36, 308–309. [Google Scholar]
  22. Brito, J.A.; Stanley, J.; Mendes, M.; Cetintas, R.; Dickson, D. Host status of selected cultivated plants to Meloidogyne mayaguensis in Florida. Nematropica 2007, 37, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alegado, R.A.; Campbell, M.C.; Chen, W.C.; Slutz, S.S.; Tan, M.W. Characterization of mediators of microbial virulence and innate immunity using the Caenorhabditis elegans host-pathogen model. Cell. Microbiol. 2003, 5, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kurz, C.L.; Tan, M.W. Regulation of aging and innate immunity in C. elegans. Aging Cell 2004, 3, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Savage-Dunn, C.; Tokarz, R.; Wang, H.; Cohen, S.; Giannikas, C.; Padgett, R.W. SMA-3 smad has specific and critical functions in DBL-1/SMA-6 TGFβ-related signaling. Dev. Biol. 2000, 223, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Davis, E.L.; Hussey, R.S.; Baum, T.J. Getting to the roots of parasitism by nematodes. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Torto-Alalibo, T.; Collmer, C.W.; Lindeberg, M.; Bird, D.; Collmer, A.; Tyler, B.M. Common and contrasting themes in host cell-targeted effectors from bacterial, fungal, oomycete and nematode plant symbionts described using the gene ontology. BMC Microbiol. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Alkharouf, N.W.; Klink, V.P.; Matthews, B.F. Identification of heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode [SCN]) cDNA sequences with high identity to those of Caenorhabditis elegans having lethal mutant or RNAi phenotypes. Exp. Parasitol. 2007, 115, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Castagnone-Sereno, P.; Deleury, E.; Danchin, E.G.; Perfus-Barbeoch, L.; Abad, P. Data-mining of the Meloidogyne incognita degradome and comparative analysis of proteases in nematodes. Genomics 2011, 97, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. De Boer, J.; Yan, Y.; Smant, G.; Davis, E.; Baum, T. In-situ hybridization to messenger RNA in heterodera glycines. J. Nematol. 1998, 30, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Gao, B.; Allen, R.; Maier, T.; Davis, E.L.; Baum, T.J.; Hussey, R.S. The parasitome of the phytonematode heterodera glycines. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Haegeman, A.; Jacob, J.; Vanholme, B.; Kyndt, T.; Mitreva, M.; Gheysen, G. Expressed sequence tags of the peanut pod nematode ditylenchus africanus: The first transcriptome analysis of an anguinid nematode. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2009, 167, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jacob, J.; Mitreva, M.; Vanholme, B.; Gheysen, G. Exploring the transcriptome of the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2008, 280, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kikuchi, T.; Aikawa, T.; Kosaka, H.; Pritchard, L.; Ogura, N.; Jones, J.T. Expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and B. mucronatus. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2007, 155, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Peng, H.; Gao, B.-L.; Kong, L.-A.; Yu, Q.; Huang, W.-K.; He, X.-F.; Long, H.-B.; Peng, D.-L. Exploring the host parasitism of the migratory plant-parasitic nematode Ditylenchus destuctor by expressed sequence tags analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lacomme, C.; Santa, C.S. Bax-induced cell death in tobacco is similar to the hypersensitive response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 7956–7961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Abramovitch, R.B.; Kim, Y.J.; Chen, S.; Dickman, M.B.; Martin, G.B. Pseudomonas type III effector AvrPtoB induces plant disease susceptibility by inhibition of host programmed cell death. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jamir, Y.; Guo, M.; Oh, H.S.; Petnicki-Ocwieja, T.; Chen, S.; Tang, X.; Dickman, M.B.; Collmer, A.; Alfano, J.R. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors that can suppress programmed cell death in plants and yeast. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2004, 37, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chronis, D.; Chen, S.; Lu, S.; Hewezi, T.; Carpenter, S.C.; Loria, R.; Baum, T.J.; Wang, X. A ubiquitin carboxyl extension protein secreted from a plant-parasitic nematode Globodera rostochiensis is cleaved in planta to promote plant parasitism. Plant J. 2013, 74, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hewezi, T.; Baum, T.J. Manipulation of plant cells by cyst and root-knot nematode effectors. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Postma, W.J.; Slootweg, E.J.; Rehman, S.; Finkers-Tomczak, A.; Tytgat, T.O.; van Gelderen, K.; Lozano-Torres, J.L.; Roosien, J.; Pomp, R.; van Schaik, C. The effector SPRYSEC-19 of Globodera rostochiensis suppresses CC-NB-LRR-mediated disease resistance in plants. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 944–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jaouannet, M.; Magliano, M.; Arguel, M.; Gourgues, M.; Evangelisti, E.; Abad, P.; Rosso, M. The root-knot nematode calreticulin Mi-CRT is a key effector in plant defense suppression. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, G.; Dong, R.; Maier, T.; Allen, R.; Davis, E.L.; Baum, T.J.; Hussey, R.S. Use of solid-phase subtractive hybridization for the identification of parasitism gene candidates from the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004, 5, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Eisenback, J.D. Diagnostic characters useful in the identification of the four most common species of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). In An Advance Treatise on Meloidogyne; North Carolina State University Graphics: Raleigh, NC, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rammah, A.; Hirschmann, H. Meloidogyne mayaguensis n. sp. (Meloidogynidae), a root-knot nematode from puerto rico. J. Nematol. 1988, 20, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Tigano, M.; Siqueira, K.D.; Castagnone-Sereno, P.; Mulet, K.; Queiroz, P.; Santos, M.D.; Teixeira, C.; Almeida, M.; Silva, J.; Carneiro, R. Genetic diversity of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii and development of a scar marker for this guava-damaging species. Plant Pathol. 2010, 59, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ding, X.; Shields, J.; Allen, R.; Hussey, R.S. A secretory cellulose-binding protein cdna cloned from the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1998, 11, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Conesa, A.; Götz, S.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Talón, M.; Robles, M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bauer, S.; Grossmann, S.; Vingron, M.; Robinson, P.N. Ontologizer 2.0—A multifunctional tool for go term enrichment analysis and data exploration. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1650–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ekseth, O.K.; Kuiper, M.; Mironov, V. Orthagogue: An agile tool for the rapid prediction of orthology relations. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 734–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Edgar, R.C. Muscle: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Capella-Gutiérrez, S.; Silla-Martínez, J.M.; Gabaldón, T. Trimal: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lewis, P.O.; Kumar, S.; Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Mega6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar]
  54. Eddy, S.R. Accelerated profile hmm searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Goldberg, J.M.; Griggs, A.D.; Smith, J.L.; Haas, B.J.; Wortman, J.R.; Zeng, Q. Kinannote, a computer program to identify and classify members of the eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2387–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. McVeigh, P.; Leech, S.; Mair, G.R.; Marks, N.J.; Geary, T.G.; Maule, A.G. Analysis of fmrfamide-like peptide (FLP) diversity in phylum nematoda. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 1043–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. McVeigh, P.; Geary, T.G.; Marks, N.J.; Maule, A.G. The FLP-side of nematodes. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Husson, S.J.; Lindemans, M.; Janssen, T.; Schoofs, L. Comparison of Caenorhabditis elegans NLP peptides with arthropod neuropeptides. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. McVeigh, P.; Alexander-Bowman, S.; Veal, E.; Mousley, A.; Marks, N.J.; Maule, A.G. Neuropeptide-like protein diversity in phylum nematoda. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1493–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Thomas Nordahl, P.; SøRen, B.; Gunnar, V.H.; Henrik, N. Signalp 4.0: Discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 785–786. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, Q.; Han, C.; Ferreira, A.O.; Yu, X.; Ye, W.; Tripathy, S.; Kale, S.D.; Gu, B.; Sheng, Y.; Sui, Y. Transcriptional programming and functional interactions within the phytophthora sojae RXLR effector repertoire. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2064–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 17 01442 g001 1024
Figure 1. Distribution of M. enterolobii assembled reads. (a) Distribution of contigs of M. enterolobii contigs in different size ranges; (b) distribution of singletons of M. enterolobii in different size ranges.
Figure 1. Distribution of M. enterolobii assembled reads. (a) Distribution of contigs of M. enterolobii contigs in different size ranges; (b) distribution of singletons of M. enterolobii in different size ranges.
Ijms 17 01442 g001
Ijms 17 01442 g002 1024
Figure 2. Functional classification of M. enterolobii transcripts. GO-annotated proteins of M. enterolobii were classified and plotted by WEGO according to the Gene Ontology Consortium.
Figure 2. Functional classification of M. enterolobii transcripts. GO-annotated proteins of M. enterolobii were classified and plotted by WEGO according to the Gene Ontology Consortium.
Ijms 17 01442 g002
Ijms 17 01442 g003 1024
Figure 3. Phylogeny and ortholog distribution of six nematodes. (a) A genome-based phylogenetic tree generated with the neighbor-joining method; (b) The orthologous proteins identified in the species are represented using colored bars that are divided into five categories: present in all organisms (green), present in all Meloidogyne species (blue), present in M. enterolobii and non-Meloidogyne species (orange), present only in M. enterolobii and M. incognita (dark green) and present only in M. enterolobii and M. hapla (dark blue). Me: M. enterolobii; Mi: M. incognita; Mh: M. hapla.
Figure 3. Phylogeny and ortholog distribution of six nematodes. (a) A genome-based phylogenetic tree generated with the neighbor-joining method; (b) The orthologous proteins identified in the species are represented using colored bars that are divided into five categories: present in all organisms (green), present in all Meloidogyne species (blue), present in M. enterolobii and non-Meloidogyne species (orange), present only in M. enterolobii and M. incognita (dark green) and present only in M. enterolobii and M. hapla (dark blue). Me: M. enterolobii; Mi: M. incognita; Mh: M. hapla.
Ijms 17 01442 g003
Ijms 17 01442 g004 1024
Figure 4. Comparison of the CAZyme repertoires in M. enterolobii and other selected nematode genomes. Enzyme families are represented by their family number according to the carbohydrate-active enzyme database (Available online: http://www.cazy.org/). Over-represented (yellow to red) and under-represented domains (yellow to blue) are depicted as Z-scores for each family. The figure was drawn using the R package heatmap.2. BUX: B. xylophilus; CE: C. elegans; Gpal: G. pallida; Me: M. enterolobii; Mi: M. incognita; Mh: M. hapla.
Figure 4. Comparison of the CAZyme repertoires in M. enterolobii and other selected nematode genomes. Enzyme families are represented by their family number according to the carbohydrate-active enzyme database (Available online: http://www.cazy.org/). Over-represented (yellow to red) and under-represented domains (yellow to blue) are depicted as Z-scores for each family. The figure was drawn using the R package heatmap.2. BUX: B. xylophilus; CE: C. elegans; Gpal: G. pallida; Me: M. enterolobii; Mi: M. incognita; Mh: M. hapla.
Ijms 17 01442 g004
Ijms 17 01442 g005 1024
Figure 5. Venn diagram on shared and unique ortholog families of secreted proteins in three Meloidogyne species. The numbers in the Venn diagram indicate the ortholog families of secreted proteins. The numbers outside the Venn diagram show the total number of predicted secreted proteins for each Meloidogyne species. Me: M. enterolobii; Mi: M. incognita; Mh: M. hapla.
Figure 5. Venn diagram on shared and unique ortholog families of secreted proteins in three Meloidogyne species. The numbers in the Venn diagram indicate the ortholog families of secreted proteins. The numbers outside the Venn diagram show the total number of predicted secreted proteins for each Meloidogyne species. Me: M. enterolobii; Mi: M. incognita; Mh: M. hapla.
Ijms 17 01442 g005
Ijms 17 01442 g006 1024
Figure 6. Expression of candidate genes that suppressed BAX-induced programmed cell death (PCD) in Nicotiana benthamiana. Four locations of selected leaves (illustrated in the table appended to the figure) were injected with the corresponding solutions. The pictures from the left panel were the leaves that had been boiled in 95% ethanol. No. 5, No. 8 and No. 10 putative proteins suppressed PCD triggered by pro-apoptosis protein BAX, and No. 8 protein also induced necrosis.
Figure 6. Expression of candidate genes that suppressed BAX-induced programmed cell death (PCD) in Nicotiana benthamiana. Four locations of selected leaves (illustrated in the table appended to the figure) were injected with the corresponding solutions. The pictures from the left panel were the leaves that had been boiled in 95% ethanol. No. 5, No. 8 and No. 10 putative proteins suppressed PCD triggered by pro-apoptosis protein BAX, and No. 8 protein also induced necrosis.
Ijms 17 01442 g006
Table
Table 1. Assembly of the M. enterolobii transcriptome.
Table 1. Assembly of the M. enterolobii transcriptome.
Assembly MetricLibraryContigsSingletons
Total base pairs165,040,879––
Total reads408,663––
Reads in assembly355,760––
Average length (bp)4031202380
EST number–819331,860
Length range (bp)–62–18,10450–1043
Operon number–814329,043
EST: Expressed sequence tag.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Yang, D.; Niu, J.; Zhao, J.; Jian, H. De Novo Analysis of the Transcriptome of Meloidogyne enterolobii to Uncover Potential Target Genes for Biological Control. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091442

AMA Style

Li X, Yang D, Niu J, Zhao J, Jian H. De Novo Analysis of the Transcriptome of Meloidogyne enterolobii to Uncover Potential Target Genes for Biological Control. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(9):1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091442

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiangyang, Dan Yang, Junhai Niu, Jianlong Zhao, and Heng Jian. 2016. "De Novo Analysis of the Transcriptome of Meloidogyne enterolobii to Uncover Potential Target Genes for Biological Control" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 9: 1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091442

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop