Next Article in Journal
Targeted Cancer Therapy: Vital Oncogenes and a New Molecular Genetic Paradigm for Cancer Initiation Progression and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Expression of Transglutaminase in Foreskin of Children with Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms17091529
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Small RNAs in Streptococcus mutans under Acid Stress—A New Insight for Caries Research

by
Shanshan Liu
1,2,
Ye Tao
1,2,
Lixia Yu
1,2,
Peilin Zhuang
1,2,
Qinghui Zhi
1,2,
Yan Zhou
1,2 and
Huancai Lin
1,2,*
1
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Road West, Guangzhou 510055, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(9), 1529; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091529
Submission received: 14 July 2016 / Revised: 6 September 2016 / Accepted: 7 September 2016 / Published: 14 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) is the major clinical pathogen responsible for dental caries. Its acid tolerance has been identified as a significant virulence factor for its survival and cariogenicity in acidic conditions. Small RNAs (sRNAs) are recognized as key regulators of virulence and stress adaptation. Here, we constructed three libraries of sRNAs with small size exposed to acidic conditions for the first time, followed by verification using qRT-PCR. The levels of two sRNAs and target genes predicted to be bioinformatically related to acid tolerance were further evaluated under different acid stress conditions (pH 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5) at three time points (0.5, 1, and 2 h). Meanwhile, bacterial growth characteristics and vitality were assessed. We obtained 1879 sRNAs with read counts of at least 100. One hundred and ten sRNAs were perfectly mapped to reported msRNAs in S. mutans. Ten out of 18 sRNAs were validated by qRT-PCR. The survival of bacteria declined as the acid was increased from pH 7.5 to 4.5 at each time point. The bacteria can proliferate under each pH except pH 4.5 with time. The levels of sRNAs gradually decreased from pH 7.5 to 5.5, and slightly increased in pH 4.5; however, the expression levels of target mRNAs were up-regulated in acidic conditions than in pH 7.5. These results indicate that some sRNAs are specially induced at acid stress conditions, involving acid adaptation, and provide a new insight into exploring the complex acid tolerance for S. mutans.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Dental caries are one of the most common chronic infectious diseases affecting the human population [1,2,3]. According to the Third National Oral Health Survey, the prevalence of caries in five-year-old children is 66% in China [4]. Therefore, studies on the prediction and prevention of dental caries in China are essential and urgent.
Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), a Gram-positive bacteria and one of the main clinical pathogens responsible for dental caries, can produce acidic end products through the fermentation of dietary carbohydrates [5]. Enamel demineralization, the first step in the formation of dental caries, occurs when the pH of the local micro-ecological environment is reduced to 5.5 [6]. However, S. mutans can survive for a long time at pH 5.5 because of its acid tolerance, which could result in the demineralization of dentine and the formation of a carious lesion [7]. Consequently, the cariogenicity of S. mutans is closely related to its acid tolerance. The reported virulence genes of S. mutans that are crucial for its acid tolerance include htrA, dnaK, groEL, uvrA, ffh, brpA, recA, relA, glnQ, and glnM [5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
In recent years, an increasing number of studies have shown that the expression of virulence genes can be regulated by small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) at the post-transcriptional level in bacteria. sRNAs are usually smaller than 300 nucleotides (nt) and can activate or inhibit virulence gene expression via base pairing with the target mRNAs of protein-coding genes [16,17,18]. The expression levels of sRNAs are altered in response to environmental changes such as acidic pH [19,20]. To date, a large number of sRNAs have been identified in numerous bacterial species including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia pestis, Brucella melitensis, Acinetobacter baumannii, Coxiella burnetii, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. However, the study of sRNAs in S. mutans remains in its early stages. More than 900 possible miRNA-size small RNAs (msRNAs) were recently reported, but it remains unclear whether the sRNAs with small size in S. mutans regulate virulence genes under acid stress conditions [32].
Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify sRNAs with small size (18–50 nt) in S. mutans induced under acid stress through a deep-sequencing approach followed by qRT-PCR verification. We hypothesize that these sRNAs may play an important role in acid tolerance. To better explore this question, two of the most expressed sRNAs (srn884837 and srn133480), as verified by qRT-PCR, were used for further study. The expression levels of the two sRNAs and five corresponding target genes related to acid tolerance under different acid stress conditions at different time points were evaluated.

2. Results

2.1. Growth and pH Drop Assay Results with an Initial pH of 5.5

To determine the growth characteristics and ensure that the total RNA could be extracted at the late exponential/early stationary phase, the growth curve of S. mutans at an initial pH of 5.5 was plotted (Figure 1A). The cells reached the late exponential/early stationary phase after 14 h of growth. This result demonstrated that S. mutans can continue proliferating under acid stress condition. To understand the acidic environment, the decrease in pH was then assessed. The data showed that the pH of the medium was not constant during the growth experiments and that the initial pH of 5.5 decreased to 4.4 (Figure 1B).

2.2. Sequence Analysis and Identification of sRNAs

We obtained 21,784,318 average reads after sequencing. After filtering out the adapter sequences, low-quality data, and sequences shorter than 18 nt, a total of 13,549,316 average sequences among the three cDNA libraries from samples A, B, and C were obtained. Of these clean reads, 6,300,672 average sequences were mapped to ribosomal RNAs and tRNAs according to Rfam, accounting for 28.92% of the total reads. There are 4,055,147 average sequences mapped to the coding sequence, accounting for 18.61% of the total reads. Finally, a total of 3,193,407 average sequences mapped to the reference genome encoded in intergenic regions, accounting for 14.66% of the total reads, which were preserved as sRNA candidates (Figure 2A). The total length distributions of the sRNAs (mappable reads) in the three libraries are shown in Figure 2B. A total of 1879 sRNAs with at least 100 mean reads was obtained (Table S1).
For conserved analysis, only 110 preserved sRNAs were perfectly mapped to the previous study of S. mutans conducted by Lee et al., and no sequence was mapped to the msRNAs mentioned in the study conducted by Mao et al. [31,32] (Table S2). Some sRNAs such as srn236413, srn587174, and srn751903 presented higher expression levels in the current study (average counts of 220, 231, and 259), with lower expression levels in the study conducted by Lee et al.

2.3. Experimental Validation of Predicted sRNAs and Prediction of Target mRNA

Eighteen putative sRNAs predicted using sequence data in Table 1 were selected for validation by qRT-PCR analysis. Among these sRNAs, 10 sRNAs were confirmed, and the high Ct value exhibited a low expression level (Table 1). To obtain preliminary information regarding the function target of these sRNAs, we predicted the target mRNAs using RNAhybrid for the two most highly expressed sRNAs (srn884837 and srn133480) in the current study. Surprisingly, the results suggested that the reported virulence genes responsible for the acid tolerance of S. mutans were putative targets of sRNAs (glnQ, glnM, brpA, and relA for srn884837; ffh, brpA, and relA for srn133480).

2.4. Bacterial Growth and Vitality Assessment under Different Acid Stress Conditions

After incubation at 37 °C for 0.5, 1, or 2 h following the culture method described in the Materials and Methods section, we obtained S. mutans cells that can continue to grow at a pH of 7.5 and 6.5 from 0.5 to 2 h (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001). The cells were able to grow during the first hour at pH 5.5 (p = 0.024) and then stopped growing; however, the cell stopped growing at pH 4.5, and the OD600 value at 2 h was even lower than those at 0.5 and 1 h (p = 0.003) (Figure 3A). With regard to the assessment of S. mutans vitality, the changes in the number of colony-forming unit (CFU) mL−1 were consistent with the growth characteristics (Figure 3B). The number of surviving bacteria at pH of 7.5, 6.5, and 5.5 increased over time, whereas the number of surviving bacteria at pH 4.5 decreased over time (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.000, and p = 0.001 for pH 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5, respectively). At different time points, the number of surviving bacteria decreased as the acidity was increased from 7.5 to 4.5 (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000 at 0.5 h, 1 h, and 2 h).

2.5. Expression Analysis of sRNAs and Target mRNAs under Different Acid Stress Conditions

To preliminarily explore the biological function of sRNAs under acid stress condition, we detected the expression levels of srn884837 and srn133480, and their corresponding target genes (glnQ, glnM, brpA, and relA for srn884837; ffh, brpA, and relA for srn133480) related to acid tolerance under different acid stress conditions and at different time points. As shown in Figure 4A, we found that both sRNAs and their target genes can be induced during the first 0.5 h. The levels of target gene ffh peaked at pH 4.5, and the target genes brpA, relA, glnQ, and glnM presented higher expression levels at a pH of 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5, suggesting that ffh has a major function in acid tolerance, particularly at pH 4.5, and that brpA, relA, glnQ, and glnM play an extensive role in different acidic conditions (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the expression levels of srn884837 and srn133480 were lower at a pH of 5.5 and 4.5 compared with pH 7.5, whereas their target genes present relatively higher expression at pH 5.5 and 4.5 and lower expression at pH 7.5. The total relative expression levels of the two sRNAs and its target genes were shown in Figure 4C. The p-values for comparison of multiple means using Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) are shown in Table S3.

3. Discussion

Low pH value (≤5.5) can lead to demineralized tooth enamel and favor the occurrence and progression of dental caries [7]. Acid tolerance is one of the main cariogenicity factors of S. mutans because its acid tolerance is regarded as a particularly significant factor in its survival at low pH values [5,6,7,8]. Therefore, clarification of the survival mechanism of S. mutans in an acid stress environment is crucial for understanding its cariogenicity. The development of deep sequencing technology has made the identification of sRNAs feasible, and this technique has been successfully applied to the identification of sRNAs in bacterial species, including S. mutans [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Recent studies showed that sRNAs play important roles in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression, which can involve virulence factors [16,17,18]. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have focused on sRNAs with small size in S. mutans under acid stress conditions, particularly at different acid stress levels. Here, we describe sRNAs (18–50 nt) in S. mutans induced at an initial pH of 5.5. Furthermore, the vitality of bacteria and functions of two of these sRNAs under different acid conditions were evaluated.
Given that there is no common secondary structure or naming method for sRNAs, all of the reads mapped to intergenic regions of the reference genome of S. mutans UA159 with high sequence similarity (mismatch ≤1) from three sequencing cDNA libraries were preserved to prevent us from missing any important sRNAs. All of the sRNA candidates were named according to the starting location in the reference genome [34,35]. The results of deep sequencing and qRT-PCR suggest the existence of a family of sRNAs in S. mutans. Only a small proportion of sRNAs were mapped to previous studies, and the expression levels of the common sRNAs presented in this study and the previous study were not the same [32,33]. These data revealed that some sRNAs were especially induced in acid stress conditions.
Several virulence genes including ffh, brpA, relA, recA, and the rest of S. mutans are associated with acid tolerance [36,37,38]. It is worth noting that virulence genes (glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, relA) are a candidate target site for sRNAs according to the prediction results. glnQ and glnM are the composition of glutamate transporter operon glnQHMP involved in acid tolerance response (ATR) by transporting of glutamate into S. mutans [14]. Ffh, encoded by ffh, is a 54-kDa subunit homologue of the signal recognition particle of Escherichia coli involved in acid tolerance by altering membrane composition [6,36]. BrpA, encoded by brpA, is a predicted surface-associated protein with high levels of similarity to LytR of Bacillus subtilis and CpsX of Streptococcus agalactiae affects the regulation of acid tolerance [12]. The relA gene of S. mutans codes for a guanosine tetraphosphate and guanosine pentaphosphate ((p)ppGpp) synthetase/hydrolase in biofilm formation and acid tolerance [15]. These results are consistent with our hypothesis that sRNAs induced under acid stress conditions might regulate the expression level of virulence genes responsible for the acid tolerance of S. mutans.
The analysis of the growth characteristics and vitality indicated that cells not only survive but proliferate at pH 7.5, 6.5, and 5.5. These data are in accordance with a previous study on S. mutans grown at steady state in continuous culture at pH 7.0 or pH 5.0 [38]. The cells stopped growing and gradually died off at pH 4.5. The decrease in the survival capacity at pH 4.5 may be due to autolysis under acidic conditions, which has been observed for Streptococcus pneumoniae, another Gram-positive Streptococcus [39]. Target genes present relatively higher expression at pH 5.5 and 4.5 compared with their expression at pH 7.5, which induced cells’ growth and survival. Previous studies showed that genes and proteins associated with acid tolerance were up-regulated under acidic conditions, validating their importance in promoting cells’ growth and survival [36,38]. However, an opposite trend was found for sRNAs, which is consistent with the results of the survival capacity analysis. At pH 4.5, the expression levels of srn884837 and srn133480 reduced rapidly, thereby decreasing the inhibition of glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, and relA, which are essential for S. mutans vitality under extreme acid stress. This mechanism may be responsible for the observed phenomena. This mechanism may be responsible for the observed phenomena. These findings indicate that the expression levels of target genes are associated with sRNAs. We suspect that the expression levels of these target genes were inhibited by sRNAs. Additional experiments should be designed and performed to prove it.
Although there are some new discoveries revealed by current study it is worthwhile to point out the weakness in this exploratory study that the number of sRNAs analyzed is not enough. Further studies including more sRNAs are needed.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

S. mutans UA159 was used in this study. HCl was added to a BHI broth to adjust the pH to 5.5. S. mutans was incubated in BHI broth with an initial pH of 5.5 for 18 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions (10% H2, 10% CO2, and 80% N2) in anaerobic jars. The growth was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm, and the decrease in pH was assessed using a pH meter every 2 h. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

4.2. Total RNA Isolation

S. mutans UA159 was inoculated into a BHI medium at pH 5.5. Once the cells reached the late exponential/early stationary phase, total RNA was extracted and purified using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Samples were prepared in triplicate (IDs: A, B, and C).

4.3. Small RNA Library Construction and Deep Sequencing

The RNAs were ligated to a 3′ RNA adapter, and then a 5′ adapter. The adapter-ligated RNAs were then subjected to reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and amplified using a low-cycle procedure. All RNA fragments that were 18–50 nt in length were isolated by PAGE according to the instructions of the TruSeq® Small RNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The library products were diluted to 10 pM for in situ cluster generation on a HiSeq2500 single-end flow cell followed by sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

4.4. Bioinformatics Analysis of Sequence Data and Identification of sRNAs

High-quality, clean data were obtained from the raw sequences after a series of data filtration steps. Rfam (http://rfam.sanger.ac.uk) was used for the removal of rRNAs and tRNAs. The remaining reads were then mapped to intergenic regions of the reference genome of S. mutans UA159 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AE014133) with high sequence similarity (mismatch ≤1) using the Burrows–Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA) (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/) [35]. BWA, a read alignment package based on a backward search using the Burrows–Wheeler Transform, can efficiently align short sequencing reads against a large reference sequence [40]. For the analysis of known sRNAs, the sRNAs sequences were perfectly mapped to the reported msRNAs in S. mutans described previously [32,33].

4.5. Validation of sRNA Candidates and Prediction of Verified sRNA Targets

Eighteen candidates were randomly selected from those with read counts at least 100 and less than 100 respectively (Table 1). More sRNAs with read counts of at least 100 were selected because researchers usually have more interest in sRNAs of bacteria with high levels in sequencing results [32,41]. They were verified by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was obtained and purified as described previously. qRT-PCR for sRNAs was performed using a miDETECT A TRACK™ qRT-PCR Kit (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The specific primers for sRNAs used in the qPCR assay were purchased from RiboBio. The RNAhybrid algorithm was previously used for the prediction of target mRNAs in bacteria [42]. It is more suitable for target prediction of short–length RNA [43,44]. The two most highly-expressed sRNAs were selected for target mRNA prediction using RNAhybrid with a maximum of −20 kcal/mol minimum free energy [45].

4.6. Effect of Different Acid Stress Conditions on the Growth, Vitality, and Gene Expression of S. mutans

To test whether acid can affect the growth and vitality of S. mutans and the expression of sRNAs and their target mRNAs related to acid tolerance, we performed a previously described assay with minor modifications [20]. S. mutans UA159 was incubated in 36 mL of BHI broth at 37 °C until the cell reached the stationary phase of growth. The cell cultures were then divided into 12 aliquots denoted 7.5-0.5, 7.5-1, 7.5-2, 6.5-0.5, 6.5-1, 6.5-2, 5.5-0.5, 5.5-1, 5.5-2, 4.5-10.5, 4.5-1, and 4.5-2. Subsequently, these 12 samples were centrifuged and resuspended in 3 mL of fresh BHI buffer at a pH of 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, or 4.5. The buffer used in a previous study was used as a reference [46]. After incubation at 37 °C for 0.5, 1, or 2 h, 200 µL of each cell suspension was collected to measure the absorbance at 600 nm. For vitality assessment, 50 µL of each cell suspension was mixed with 450 µL of PBS. Bacterial samples (10 µL) were inoculated by spiral plating onto BHI agar plates at three dilutions (10−6, 10−7, and 10−8), and the total number of colony-forming units (CFUs) per volume (CFUs·mL−1) were quantified after anaerobic incubation for 48 h at 37 °C. The cell suspensions remaining at each time point were harvested by centrifugation and used for RNA isolation. Total RNA was extracted, and qRT-PCR for sRNAs was performed as described previously. The target genes (glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, and relA) were reverse-transcribed using the PrimeScript™ Reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The qPCR reaction mixture (10 µL) included 5 µL of SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 10 µM of the specific forward and reverse primers (0.2 µL for each), 1 µL of the template cDNA, and 3.6 µL of RNase-free water. The qPCR conditions included an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and extension at 70 °C for 1 s. The 16S rRNA levels under each condition were used for normalization. The specific forward and reverse primers for glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, and relA were described previously [14,36,37]. The primer sequences are shown in Table 2. The threshold cycle values (Ct) were determined, and the data were analyzed according to the 2−ΔΔCt method [47].

4.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 20.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test and homogeneity of variance tests were used to assess whether the data were parametric or not. For parametric testing, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test were performed for comparisons of multiple means. Values were considered statistically significant if the p-value was <0.05. For nonparametric testing, the Kruskal–Wallis test was first used, and one-way ANOVA was performed after data transformation when the p-value was less than 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we constructed three small non-coding RNA libraries (18–50 nt) of S. mutans under acid stress conditions for the first time. sRNA sequences were identified by deep sequencing combined with bioinformatics analysis. Sequences were verified using qRT-PCR. This study revealed that a series of sRNAs were uniquely induced under acid stress. The expression analysis of srn884837 and srn133480 and its target genes associated with acid tolerance suggested that some sRNAs of S. mutans play a critical role in acid adaptation. From the perspective of molecular biology, our novel discovery will help drive a new era of caries research.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/9/1529/s1.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81570967).

Author Contributions

Shanshan Liu contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, and analysis, and drafted the manuscript; Ye Tao, Lixia Yu, and Peilin Zhuang contributed to the data acquisition; Qinghui Zhi and Yan Zhou contributed to the analysis and drafted the manuscript; and Huancai Lin contributed to the conception, design, data acquisition, and analysis, and read and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramos-Jorge, J.; Pordeus, I.A.; Ramos-Jorge, M.L.; Marques, L.S.; Paiva, S.M. Impact of untreated dental caries on quality of life of preschool children: Different stages and activity. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2014, 42, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ramos-Jorge, J.; Alencar, B.M.; Pordeus, I.A.; Soares, M.E.; Marques, L.S.; Ramos-Jorge, M.L.; Paiva, S.M. Impact of dental caries on quality of life among preschool children: Emphasis on the type of tooth and stages of progression. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2015, 123, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Martins-Junior, P.A.; Vieira-Andrade, R.G.; Correa-Faria, P.; Oliveira-Ferreira, F.; Marques, L.S.; Ramos-Jorge, M.L. Impact of early childhood caries on the oral health-related quality of life of preschool children and their parents. Caries Res. 2013, 47, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qi, X.Q. Report of the Third National Oral Health Survey in China; People’s Medical Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2008. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Kang, K.H.; Lee, J.S.; Yoo, M.; Jin, I. The influence of HtrA expression on the growth of Streptococcus mutans during acid stress. Mol. Cells 2010, 29, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Matsui, R.; Cvitkovitch, D. Acid tolerance mechanisms utilized by Streptococcus mutans. Future Microbiol. 2010, 5, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Neilands, J.; Sutherland, D.; Resin, A.; Wejse, P.L.; Chavez de Paz, L.E. Chitosan nanoparticles affect the acid tolerance response in adhered cells of Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 2011, 45, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lemos, J.A.; Luzardo, Y.; Burne, R.A. Physiologic effects of forced down-regulation of dnaK and groEL expression in Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 1582–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Crowley, P.J.; Svensater, G.; Snoep, J.L.; Bleiweis, A.S.; Brady, L.J. An ffh mutant of Streptococcus mutans is viable and able to physiologically adapt to low pH in continuous culture. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 234, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hanna, M.N.; Ferguson, R.J.; Li, Y.H.; Cvitkovitch, D.G. uvrA is an acid-inducible gene involved in the adaptive response to low pH in Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 5964–5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lemos, J.A.; Chen, Y.Y.; Burne, R.A. Genetic and physiologic analysis of the groE operon and role of the HrcA repressor in stress gene regulation and acid tolerance in Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 6074–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wen, Z.T.; Baker, H.V.; Burne, R.A. Influence of BrpA on critical virulence attributes of Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 2983–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Inagaki, S.; Matsumoto-Nakano, M.; Fujita, K.; Nagayama, K.; Funao, J.; Ooshima, T. Effects of recombinase A deficiency on biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 24, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Krastel, K.; Senadheera, D.B.; Mair, R.; Downey, J.S.; Goodman, S.D.; Cvitkovitch, D.G. Characterization of a glutamate transporter operon, glnQHMP, in Streptococcus mutans and its role in acid tolerance. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 984–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lemos, J.A.; Brown, T.A., Jr.; Burne, R.A. Effects of RelA on key virulence properties of planktonic and biofilm populations of Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 1431–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Caldelari, I.; Chao, Y.; Romby, P.; Vogel, J. RNA-mediated regulation in pathogenic bacteria. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2013, 3, a010298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hoe, C.H.; Raabe, C.A.; Rozhdestvensky, T.S.; Tang, T.H. Bacterial sRNAs: Regulation in stress. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 303, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lalaouna, D.; Simoneau-Roy, M.; Lafontaine, D.; Masse, E. Regulatory RNAs and target mRNA decay in prokaryotes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1829, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Geissmann, T.; Chevalier, C.; Cros, M.J.; Boisset, S.; Fechter, P.; Noirot, C.; Schrenzel, J.; Francois, P.; Vandenesch, F.; Gaspin, C.; et al. A search for small noncoding RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a conserved sequence motif for regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 7239–7257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xia, L.; Xia, W.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Liu, J.; Ding, H.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Su, X.; et al. Identification and expression of small non-coding RNA, L10-Leader, in different growth phases of Streptococcus mutans. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2012, 22, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Chabelskaya, S.; Gaillot, O.; Felden, B. A Staphylococcus aureus small RNA is required for bacterial virulence and regulates the expression of an immune-evasion molecule. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Izar, B.; Mraheil, M.A.; Hain, T. Identification and role of regulatory non-coding RNAs in Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5070–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Khandige, S.; Kronborg, T.; Uhlin, B.E.; Moller-Jensen, J. sRNA-Mediated Regulation of P-Fimbriae Phase Variation in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mika, F.; Hengge, R. Small Regulatory RNAs in the Control of Motility and Biofilm Formation in E. coli and Salmonella. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 4560–4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Novick, R.P.; Ross, H.F.; Projan, S.J.; Kornblum, J.; Kreiswirth, B.; Moghazeh, S. Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 3967–3975. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Pellin, D.; Miotto, P.; Ambrosi, A.; Cirillo, D.M.; Di Serio, C. A genome-wide identification analysis of small regulatory RNAs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by RNA-Seq and conservation analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Schiano, C.A.; Koo, J.T.; Schipma, M.J.; Caulfield, A.J.; Jafari, N.; Lathem, W.W. Genome-wide analysis of small RNAs expressed by Yersinia pestis identifies a regulator of the Yop-Ysc type III secretion system. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 1659–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sharma, R.; Arya, S.; Patil, S.D.; Sharma, A.; Jain, P.K.; Navani, N.K.; Pathania, R. Identification of novel regulatory small RNAs in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Warrier, I.; Hicks, L.D.; Battisti, J.M.; Raghavan, R.; Minnick, M.F. Identification of novel small RNAs and characterization of the 6S RNA of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhong, Z.; Xu, X.; Li, X.; Liu, S.; Lei, S.; Yang, M.; Yu, J.; Yuan, J.; Ke, Y.; Du, X.; et al. Large-scale identification of small noncoding RNA with strand-specific deep sequencing and characterization of a novel virulence-related sRNA in Brucella melitensis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Acebo, P.; Martin-Galiano, A.J.; Navarro, S.; Zaballos, A.; Amblar, M. Identification of 88 regulatory small RNAs in the TIGR4 strain of the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. RNA 2012, 18, 530–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, H.J.; Hong, S.H. Analysis of microRNA-size, small RNAs in Streptococcus mutans by deep sequencing. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 326, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mao, M.Y.; Yang, Y.M.; Li, K.Z.; Lei, L.; Li, M.; Yang, Y.; Tao, X.; Yin, J.X.; Zhang, R.; Ma, X.R.; et al. The rnc Gene Promotes Exopolysaccharide Synthesis and Represses the vicRKX Gene Expressions via MicroRNA-Size Small RNAs in Streptococcus mutans. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sridhar, J.; Gunasekaran, P. Computational small RNA prediction in bacteria. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2013, 7, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Yi, S.; Gao, Z.X.; Zhao, H.; Zeng, C.; Luo, W.; Chen, B.; Wang, W.M. Identification and characterization of microRNAs involved in growth of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) by Solexa sequencing. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Downey, J.S.; Mashburn-Warren, L.; Ayala, E.A.; Senadheera, D.B.; Hendrickson, W.K.; McCall, L.W.; Sweet, J.G.; Cvitkovitch, D.G.; Spatafora, G.A.; Goodman, S.D. In vitro manganese-dependent cross-talk between Streptococcus mutans VicK and GcrR: Implications for overlapping stress response pathways. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kim, B.S.; Park, S.J.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, S.B.; Lee, K.H.; Choi, N.Y.; Lee, Y.R.; Lee, Y.E.; You, Y.O. Inhibitory effects of chrysanthemum boreale essential oil on biofilm formation and virulence factor expression of Streptococcus mutans. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 616309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Len, A.C.; Harty, D.W.; Jacques, N.A. Stress-responsive proteins are upregulated in Streptococcus mutans during acid tolerance. Microbiology 2004, 150 Pt 5, 1339–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Diez-Martinez, R.; Garcia-Fernandez, E.; Manzano, M.; Martinez, A.; Domenech, M.; Vallet-Regi, M.; Garcia, P. Auranofin-loaded nanoparticles as a new therapeutic tool to fight streptococcal infections. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cho, S.H.; Lei, R.; Henninger, T.D.; Contreras, L.M. Discovery of ethanol-responsive small RNAs in Zymomonas mobilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 4189–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sharma, C.M.; Darfeuille, F.; Plantinga, T.H.; Vogel, J. A small RNA regulates multiple ABC transporter mRNAs by targeting C/A-rich elements inside and upstream of ribosome-binding sites. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 2804–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pain, A.; Ott, A.; Amine, H.; Rochat, T.; Bouloc, P.; Gautheret, D. An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs. RNA Biol. 2015, 12, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rehmsmeier, M.; Steffen, P.; Hochsmann, M.; Giegerich, R. Fast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes. RNA 2004, 10, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Norden-Krichmar, T.M.; Allen, A.E.; Gaasterland, T.; Hildebrand, M. Characterization of the small RNA transcriptome of the diatom, Thalassiosira pseudonana. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vacca Smith, A.M.; Ng-Evans, L.; Wunder, D.; Bowen, W.H. Studies concerning the glucosyltransferase of Streptococcus sanguis. Caries Res. 2000, 34, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 17 01529 g001 1024
Figure 1. Growth curve and pH drop assay. (A) Growth curve of S. mutans cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth with an initial pH of 5.5; and (B) the change in pH during the growth experiment. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations from triplicate experiments.
Figure 1. Growth curve and pH drop assay. (A) Growth curve of S. mutans cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth with an initial pH of 5.5; and (B) the change in pH during the growth experiment. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations from triplicate experiments.
Ijms 17 01529 g001
Ijms 17 01529 g002 1024
Figure 2. Annotation and length distribution of sequenced data. (A) Annotation of the constituent ratio from sequenced data; and (B) the length distribution of small RNA libraries in three samples. The nt lengths of sRNAs are shown on the x-axis; the proportion of sRNAs accounting for total unique reads are shown on the y-axis. sRNAs (≥37 nt in length) only account for a small proportion of the total reads and are thus shown together.
Figure 2. Annotation and length distribution of sequenced data. (A) Annotation of the constituent ratio from sequenced data; and (B) the length distribution of small RNA libraries in three samples. The nt lengths of sRNAs are shown on the x-axis; the proportion of sRNAs accounting for total unique reads are shown on the y-axis. sRNAs (≥37 nt in length) only account for a small proportion of the total reads and are thus shown together.
Ijms 17 01529 g002
Ijms 17 01529 g003a 1024Ijms 17 01529 g003b 1024
Figure 3. Growth and vitality analysis of S. mutans under different acid stress conditions. (A) Average absorbance (OD 600 nm) of S. mutans grown at pH 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5 for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. Cells can continue to grow at a pH of 7.5 and 6.5 from 0.5 to 2 h, and pH 5.5 at the first hour (p < 0.05). The average absorbance value at 2 h was lower than those under pH 4.5 at 0.5 and 1 h (p < 0.05); and (B) mean number of colony forming units (colony-forming unit (CFU) × 1010) per mL at pH 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5 for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. The survival bacteria at pH of 7.5, 6.5, and 5.5 increased over time and the survival bacteria at pH 4.5 decreased over time (p < 0.05). The survival bacteria decreased at the acid was increased from 7.5 to 4.5 (p < 0.001). The error bars indicate the standard deviations from triplicate experiments.
Figure 3. Growth and vitality analysis of S. mutans under different acid stress conditions. (A) Average absorbance (OD 600 nm) of S. mutans grown at pH 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5 for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. Cells can continue to grow at a pH of 7.5 and 6.5 from 0.5 to 2 h, and pH 5.5 at the first hour (p < 0.05). The average absorbance value at 2 h was lower than those under pH 4.5 at 0.5 and 1 h (p < 0.05); and (B) mean number of colony forming units (colony-forming unit (CFU) × 1010) per mL at pH 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5 for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. The survival bacteria at pH of 7.5, 6.5, and 5.5 increased over time and the survival bacteria at pH 4.5 decreased over time (p < 0.05). The survival bacteria decreased at the acid was increased from 7.5 to 4.5 (p < 0.001). The error bars indicate the standard deviations from triplicate experiments.
Ijms 17 01529 g003aIjms 17 01529 g003b
Ijms 17 01529 g004a 1024Ijms 17 01529 g004b 1024
Figure 4. qRT-PCR analysis of sRNAs (srn884837 and srn133480) and target mRNAs (glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, relA) under different acid stress conditions. (A) (a,b) present the expression levels of srn884837 and srn133480 in S. mutan, respectively. The expression level of each sRNA after growth at pH 7.5 for 0.5 h is defined as 1.0. The error bars display the standard deviations of three biological replicates. The two sRNAs present relatively lower expression at pH of 5.5 and 4.5 compared at pH 7.5 (p < 0.05 for srn884837 and srn133480 at 0.5, 1, 2 h, respectively). The p-values for comparison of multiple means using Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) are detailed in Table S3; (B) (a–e) present the expression levels of the target genes glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, and relA, respectively. The expression level of each gene after growth at pH 7.5 for 0.5 h is defined as 1.0. The error bars display the standard deviations of three biological replicates. The target genes present relatively higher expression at pH 5.5 and 4.5 compared with pH 7.5 (p < 0.05 for glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, and relA, respectively). The p-values for comparison of multiple means are detailed in Table S3; and (C) a heat map showing the total relative expression patterns of the two sRNAs and five target genes at pH values from 7.5 to 4.5 at each time point. The expression level of srn133480 after growth at pH 7.5 for 0.5 h is defined as 1.0.
Figure 4. qRT-PCR analysis of sRNAs (srn884837 and srn133480) and target mRNAs (glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, relA) under different acid stress conditions. (A) (a,b) present the expression levels of srn884837 and srn133480 in S. mutan, respectively. The expression level of each sRNA after growth at pH 7.5 for 0.5 h is defined as 1.0. The error bars display the standard deviations of three biological replicates. The two sRNAs present relatively lower expression at pH of 5.5 and 4.5 compared at pH 7.5 (p < 0.05 for srn884837 and srn133480 at 0.5, 1, 2 h, respectively). The p-values for comparison of multiple means using Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) are detailed in Table S3; (B) (a–e) present the expression levels of the target genes glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, and relA, respectively. The expression level of each gene after growth at pH 7.5 for 0.5 h is defined as 1.0. The error bars display the standard deviations of three biological replicates. The target genes present relatively higher expression at pH 5.5 and 4.5 compared with pH 7.5 (p < 0.05 for glnQ, glnM, ffh, brpA, and relA, respectively). The p-values for comparison of multiple means are detailed in Table S3; and (C) a heat map showing the total relative expression patterns of the two sRNAs and five target genes at pH values from 7.5 to 4.5 at each time point. The expression level of srn133480 after growth at pH 7.5 for 0.5 h is defined as 1.0.
Ijms 17 01529 g004aIjms 17 01529 g004b
Table
Table 1. sRNAs selected for qRT-PCR.
Table 1. sRNAs selected for qRT-PCR.
IDStart LocationLengthSequenceStrandsMismatchCounts (Average)Ct (Average)
srn884837193011229ACGTGAATCATCGGTGCCAATACAGCATT+0114328.47
srn13348029319727TAAGCGATGTAAGCTGTGTGCTCTATT+0223832.83
srn854592186436221AAAAAGAGCAGCTAAATCGGA−094933.38
srn14017730593118TTTGTTCAAGATTGTACT+017035.67
srn47001599173319TCTAAGACAAATTCCGTTA−011436.27
srn37177876382518TAACATCTGAAACTAAGG+018536.58
srn821712179387418TTGACTGACTAACTATCA+03536.90
srn22800248002520TAGTATCTGTAGTTGCTGCA+029937.09
srn638035135767819TGTCTCAGTCCTATACACA−0837.30
srn21967246170220GATCAATACATGTATCCTTA−04838.38
srn9160821039118AAGTGTCTAAGTTAGATT−0139-
srn17487537425718GGACAGGATGTCTACTTA−0101-
srn34230371351518GGACAGTATCTTCAATTA−0177-
srn43046289960918AGAGTATTTAACTAGTCG−069-
srn44433292947420ACCAAACGATCAAACCGTGA−0352-
srn628738132816535ACACAGCTCTAAAACTCACCATATTAATTAATGGC−01451-
srn800380175789318ATTAAGACCCCCAACAAT−0436-
srn821539179372419TTGTTTTAGAAACTTCTGC+044-
Table
Table 2. Primer sequences.
Table 2. Primer sequences.
IDPrimer Sequences
srn884837purchased from RiboBio, Guangzhou, China
srn133480purchased from RiboBio, Guangzhou, China
glnQ (F)GACAGGTTGTTGTTTTACTTG
glnQ (R)GGTCCTTAGTTGAAGCATTGG
glnM (F)GAAGTCATTCGCTCTGGTATTGAAG
glnM (R)CATTGGTGGCAAGATAGTTCTGATG
ffh (F)AAGGTAAGCAAGTCTCCCATTC
ffh (R)TCCGTCAAATCACTGGAAAAC
brpA (F)GGAGGAGCTGCATCAGGATTC
brpA (R)AACTCCAGCACATCCAGCAAG
relA (F)ACAAAAAGGGTATCGTCCGTACAT
relA (R)AATCACGCTTGGTATTGCTAATTG
16S rRNA (F)CTGACTTGAGTGCAGAAGGGGA
16S rRNA (R)CGTCAGTGACAGACCAGAGAGC

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Tao, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhuang, P.; Zhi, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, H. Analysis of Small RNAs in Streptococcus mutans under Acid Stress—A New Insight for Caries Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091529

AMA Style

Liu S, Tao Y, Yu L, Zhuang P, Zhi Q, Zhou Y, Lin H. Analysis of Small RNAs in Streptococcus mutans under Acid Stress—A New Insight for Caries Research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(9):1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shanshan, Ye Tao, Lixia Yu, Peilin Zhuang, Qinghui Zhi, Yan Zhou, and Huancai Lin. 2016. "Analysis of Small RNAs in Streptococcus mutans under Acid Stress—A New Insight for Caries Research" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 9: 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091529

APA Style

Liu, S., Tao, Y., Yu, L., Zhuang, P., Zhi, Q., Zhou, Y., & Lin, H. (2016). Analysis of Small RNAs in Streptococcus mutans under Acid Stress—A New Insight for Caries Research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(9), 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop