Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Flower Color through Simultaneous Expression of the B-peru and mPAP1 Transcription Factors under Control of a Flower-Specific Promoter
Next Article in Special Issue
A Three–MicroRNA Signature as a Potential Biomarker for the Early Detection of Oral Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Sugar Transporter Genes during Early Infection by Root-Knot Nematodes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms19010307
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Circulating Plasma Levels of miR-20b, miR-29b and miR-155 as Predictors of Bevacizumab Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

by
Paola Ulivi
1,*,
Matteo Canale
1,
Alessandro Passardi
2,
Giorgia Marisi
1,
Martina Valgiusti
2,
Giovanni Luca Frassineti
2,
Daniele Calistri
1,
Dino Amadori
2 and
Emanuela Scarpi
3
1
Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy
2
Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy
3
Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(1), 307; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010307
Submission received: 3 January 2018 / Revised: 15 January 2018 / Accepted: 18 January 2018 / Published: 20 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MicroRNA as Biomarkers in Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Targeting angiogenesis in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common strategy, for which potential predictive biomarkers have been studied. miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs involved in several processes including the angiogenic pathway. They are very stable in biological fluids, which turns them into potential circulating biomarkers. In this study, we considered a case series of patients with metastatic (m) CRC treated with a bevacizumab (B)-based treatment, enrolled in the prospective multicentric Italian Trial in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (ITACa). We then analyzed a panel of circulating miRNAs in relation to the patient outcome. In multivariate analysis, circulating basal levels of hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-29b-3p and hsa-miR-155-5p resulted in being significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.027, p = 0.034 and p = 0.039, respectively) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.044, p = 0.024 and p = 0.032, respectively). We also observed that an increase in hsa-miR-155-5p at the first clinical evaluation was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR 3.03 (95% CI 1.06–9.09), p = 0.040) and OS (HR 3.45 (95% CI 1.18–10.00), p = 0.024), with PFS and OS of 9.5 (95% CI 6.8–18.7) and 15.9 (95% CI 8.4–not reached), respectively, in patients with an increase ≥30% of hsa-miR-155-5p and 22.3 (95% CI 10.2–25.5) and 42.9 (24.8–not reached) months, respectively, in patients without such increase. In conclusion, our results highlight the potential usefulness of circulating basal levels of hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-29b-3p and hsa-miR-155-5p in predicting the outcome of patients with mCRC treated with B. In addition, the variation of circulating hsa-miR-155-5p could also be indicative of the patient survival.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Targeting angiogenesis has been the standard of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for more than a decade, and novel anti-angiogenic agents are emerging each year. However, despite improvements in our understanding of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer (CRC), there are still no validated biomarkers for anti-angiogenic treatment. According to randomized clinical trials [1,2,3], bevacizumab (B), a monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor A, is widely used in combination with the chemotherapeutic regimen in a number of countries. Although several biomarkers have been studied and hypothesized to be useful for patient selection, none of these have yet been validated for use in clinical practice [4,5,6].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs approximately 18–25 nucleotides long with an important role in regulating gene expression. Expression patterns of miRNAs correlate with specific clinical pathological parameters in different cancer subtypes, suggesting that miRNAs could be potential biomarkers on the basis of tumor origin, histology, aggressiveness or chemosensitivity [7]. It has been reported that miRNAs may regulate the angiogenic process by exerting pro-angiogenic or anti-angiogenic effects [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Specific tumor tissue miRNAs have been shown to be predictive of the effectiveness of B in CRC patients [15]. The nature of miRNAs renders them particularly stable in biological fluids such as serum and plasma, making them potentially ideal circulating biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and as predictors of response to treatment [7,16]. With regard to this last characteristic, a miRNA signature composed of eight circulating miRNAs has been found to significantly correlate with overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma treated with B [17], whereas a six-circulating miRNA signature has proven prognostic in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with B plus erlotinib followed by platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) [18].
A previous study analyzed the role of circulating miR-126 in relation to outcome in patients treated with CT plus B. The authors demonstrated that an increased level of miR-126 from baseline to the first clinical evaluation was associated with a lack of benefit to treatment, concluding that it could represent a resistance mechanism to B [19].
In this study, we evaluated a panel of circulating miRNAs, including miR-126, selected on the basis of their role in the angiogenic process, as bio-markers of the treatment with bevacizumab. To this aim, we determined miRNA plasma levels in a case series of patients treated with a B-based CT, enrolled into the prospective multicentric randomized phase III study “Italian Trial in Advanced Colorectal Cancer” (ITACa) [20].

2. Results

2.1. Case Series

The clinical pathological characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1.
Median age was 65 years (range 37–83 years), and about two thirds (35 patients, 67.3%) were male, in a good performance status and in an advanced stage of the disease. The tumor localization was mainly the colon (71.1%), compared to the rectum (28.9%), and equally distributed as left- and right-sided tumors. A total of 48.1% had a RAS mutation (21 patients were KRAS mutated and four were NRAS mutated), and 11.5% had a BRAF mutation.

2.2. Baseline Circulating miRNAs in Relation to Clinical Pathological Characteristics of Patients

By GeNorm analysis, two miRNAs (hsa-miR-484 and hsa-miR-223-3p) resulted in being the more stable and were used for the normalization analysis together with the spike in cel-miR-39-3p.
Baseline circulating levels of some miRNAs were significantly associated with the clinical pathological characteristics of patients. Of the analyzed miRNAs, three (hsa-miR-199a-5p, hsa-miR-335-5p and hsa-miR-520d-3p) were significantly upregulated in left-sided compared to right-sided lesions (Table 2) and two were significantly correlated with RAS status.
In particular, hsa-miR-21-5p was significantly downregulated in both KRAS and NRAS mutated patients. Conversely, hsa-miR-221-3p was significantly upregulated in RAS mutated patients (Table 3).

2.3. Response to Therapy and Prognosis in Relation to Clinical Pathological Characteristics of Patients

Overall, an objective response rate (ORR) of 62.7% was observed. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.1–14.1) and 22.7 months (95% CI 13.1–28.8), respectively. No correlation was found between response to therapy and clinical pathological characteristics of patients. Conversely, performance and BRAF statuses were significantly associated with both PFS and OS. In particular, a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.32 (95% CI 1.06–5.08), p = 0.036, and HR of 3.27 (95% CI 1.45–7.41), p = 0.004, were observed for performance status in relation to PFS and OS, respectively, whereas HR of 3.41 (95% CI 1.35–8.59), p = 0.009, and HR of 3.62 (95% CI 1.45–9.07), p = 0.006, were observed for BRAF status in relation to PFS and OS, respectively. Age, dichotomized on the basis of the median value, was significantly associated with PFS (HR 2.11 (95% CI 1.15–3.89), p = 0.016) but not with OS. Moreover, CT regimen was associated with OS: HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.05–3.79), p = 0.035 (Table S1).

2.4. Baseline Circulating miRNAs in Relation to Response to Therapy and Patient Prognosis

With regard to response to therapy, only hsa-miR-17-5p resulted in being significantly correlated, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.77–0.99).
In univariate analysis, two miRNAs, hsa-miR-20b-5p and hsa-miR424-5p, were significantly associated with PFS and OS. In particular, HR of 0.931 (95% CI 0.880–0.986, p = 0.014) and of 0.932 (95% CI 0.869–0.999, p = 0.048) were observed for PFS. With regard to OS, HR of 0.922 (95% CI 0.869–0.978, p = 0.007) and of 0.891 (95% CI 0.827–0.960, p = 0.002) were observed. miRNA hsa-miR-29b-3p resulted in being significantly correlated with PFS (HR 0.868 (95% CI 0.796–0.948), p = 0.002), but not with OS (p = 0.070). In addition, hsa-miR-155-5p was borderline associated with PFS and OS (p = 0.078 and 0.065, respectively) (Table S2).
In multivariate analysis, considering miRNAs levels as continuous variables, hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-29b-3p and hsa-miR-155-5p resulted in being significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.027, p = 0.034 and p = 0.039, respectively) and OS (p = 0.044, p = 0.024 and p = 0.032, respectively) (Table 4).
Setting the median value as the cutoff, statistically-significant differences were seen in terms of PFS and OS for the three miRNAs. In particular, significantly longer PFS and OS were observed for patients with circulating miRNA values over the cutoff (Table 5 and Figure 1).

2.5. Circulating miRNAs’ Variations during Treatment in Relation to Patient Outcome

Variations of miRNAs at the first clinical evaluation with respect to baseline were analyzed. Differences in miRNAs variation were observed in relation to the clinical pathological characteristics of patients. In particular, different variations were observed in relation to left- or right-sided tumors for hsa-miR-16-5p (p = 0.049), hsa-miR-221-3p (p = 0.011), hsa-miR-29b-3p (p = 0.015) and hsa-miR-335-5p (p = 0.026). Variations of hsa-miR-221-3p were also associated with the BRAF status (p = 0.049). Moreover, hsa-miR-194-5p variations were significantly associated with the KRAS status (p = 0.040).
We analyzed the variation of circulating miRNA expression at the first clinical evaluation in relation to response to treatment and PFS and OS. No significant associations were observed between miRNA variations and response to therapy. Conversely, we observed that an increase of hsa-miR-155-5p was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR 3.03 (95% CI 1.06–9.09), p = 0.040) and OS (HR 3.45 (95% CI 1.18–10.00), p = 0.024), with PFS and OS of 9.5 (95% CI 6.8–18.7) and 15.9 (95% CI 8.4– not reached), respectively, in patients with an increase ≥30% of hsa-miR-155-5p and 22.3 (95% CI 10.2–25.5) and 42.9 (24.8–not reached) months, respectively, in patients without such increase (Figure 2). An increase of hsa-miR-24-3p was also associated with a significantly shorter PFS (HR 2.22 (95% CI 0.99–5.00), p = 0.053), and OS (HR 2.13 (95% CI 0.89–5.00), p = 0.087).

3. Discussion

In this study, we found that specific circulating miRNAs are associated with prognosis in mCRC patients treated with CT plus B. Baseline circulating levels of hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-29b-3p and hsa-miR-155-5p were significantly correlated with PFS and OS. Patients with higher baseline levels of the three miRNAs showed longer PFS and OS, suggesting that they could be involved in pathways potentially correlated with the angiogenic pathway and, as a consequence, with B efficacy. It has been demonstrated that hsa-miR-29b is capable of repressing tumor angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis, by targeting metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) [21]. Similarly, another study has demonstrated that miR-29b in non-small cell lung cancer models could suppress cells proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting the 3’-UTR of MMP2 and PTEN mRNA [22]. More recently, it has been reported that hsa-miR-29b suppresses tumor growth through simultaneously inhibiting angiogenesis and tumorigenesis by targeting Akt3 [23]. These findings are in agreement with our results, suggesting that patients with higher levels of hsa-miR-29b could have a greater benefit from B as both exert an anti-angiogenic effect. Although little evidence is available on the correlation between miR-20b and the angiogenic process, a recent study reported the role of hsa-miR-20b in regulating proliferation and senescence of endothelial cells, through the involvement of RBL1 [24]. We also observed that patients with a high basal level of hsa-miR-155-5p had a better outcome and that patients with a rise in the level of this type of miRNA at the first clinical evaluation (i.e., after one month of treatment) had a considerable shorter PFS and OS. Of the many studies on the role of hsa-miR-155-5p in the angiogenic process [25,26,27], some have reported a role in the process of hypoxia [25,28], showing that hsa-miR-155 contributes to controlling hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) expression and promotes angiogenesis under hypoxia condition. The association between high basal levels of hsa-miR-155-5p and better outcome of patients treated with B is consistent with the link between this miRNA and angiogenesis and inflammation processes [27,29], both targets of the drug. On the other hand, the induction of circulating hsa-miR-155 after treatment with B could indicate a process of drug resistance due to the stimulation of angiogenesis that could contrast with the B activity and that could be in line with the poor prognosis of such patients. We also observed a less evident association between the induction of circulating hsa-miR-24-3p and a worse outcome. It has been shown that the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene is one of the targets of hsa-miR-24-3p and that hsa-miR-24-3p inhibition increases eNOS protein expression [30,31] with a consequent role in the angiogenic process. In contrast with previous findings [19], our study did not reveal any correlation between miR-126 circulating levels and patient outcome.
We also showed that baseline circulating miRNA levels differed with respect to patient clinical pathological characteristics, in particular tumor location and RAS status. As defined previously [32], left-sided tumors (originating in the splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum or one-third of the transverse colon) derive from the embryonic hindgut, whereas right-sided tumors (originating in the appendix, cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure or two-thirds of the transverse colon) derive from the embryonic midgut. The hsa-miR-199a-5p, hsa-miR-335-5p and hsa-miR-520d-3p miRNAs were significantly more upregulated in patients with left-sided than right-sided lesions, reflecting the different tumor biology. As all three miRNAs act as tumor suppressors [33,34,35,36], their overexpression in left-sided tumors could partially explain the better outcome of this group of patients. These differences in circulating miRNA expression with respect to tumor side agree with our recent report indicating different gene expression profiles, inflammatory indexes and responses to B in patients with left- and right-sided tumors [37]. Furthermore, miRNAs has-miR-21-5p and hsa-miR-221-3p were found to be significantly correlated with RAS status. Decreased hsa-miR-21-5p and increased hsa-miR-221-3p were observed in RAS mutated patients with respect to RAS wt patients. Although it has been demonstrated that these miRNAs are involved in the angiogenic process, we did not observe a correlation between hsa-miR-21-5p or hsa-miR-221-3p and response to bevacizumab.
This study has some limitations. First, the sample size was small, making it necessary to confirm results in a larger case series. Moreover, the lack of a control group treated with chemotherapy alone did not permit us to understand whether miRNAs were of prognostic value or predictive of response to B. Finally, we restricted our analysis to a specific panel of miRNAs on the basis of literature results, but cannot exclude that other miRNAs may play a role in response to B.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Case Series

This study included patients enrolled in the ITACa clinical trial [17], randomized to be treated with first-line CT (FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI) only or CT plus B. Fifty-two patients in the CT + B arm, whose biological material was available, were analyzed for this study. All patients were characterized for RAS and BRAF status by MassARRAY (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) using the Myriapod Colon status (Diatech Pharmacogenetics, Jesi, Italy) as the routine diagnostic procedure. Consenting patients underwent periodic blood sampling: peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline (before treatment began), at the first evaluation (after around 2 months) and when progressive disease (PD) was documented. All patients were assessed for response, PFS and OS according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria Version 1.1. Tumor response was evaluated every 2 months by CT scan. Responders included patients with a complete response (CR) and a partial response (PR). Non-responders included patients with stable disease (SD) or PD. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Area Vasta e Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, no. 674) on 19 September 2007. All patients gave informed consent before blood sample collection.

4.2. miRNA Selection

A review of the literature was made for selecting the panel of miRNAs for analysis in plasma. The miRNAs were selected on the basis of their role in the angiogenic process, especially in CRC, and evidence of their possible determination in plasma or serum [38,39,40]. Twenty-three miRNAs were selected for analysis as follows: has-miR-107, hsa-miR-126-3hashsa-miR-145-5p, hsa-miR-194-5p, hsa-miR-199a-5p, hsa-miR-200b-3p, hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-210-3p, hsa-miR-221-3p, hsa-miR-223-3p, hsa-miR-24-3p, hsa-miR-27a-3p, hsa-miR-29b-3p, hsa-miR-335-5p, hsa-miR-424-5p, hsa-miR-484, hsa-miR-497-5p, hsa-miR-520d-3p, hsa-miR-92a-3p, hsa-miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR-16-5p. Moreover, cel-miR-39-3p was used as a spike-in for exogenous normalization.

4.3. Circulating miRNA Expression Analysis

Plasma was obtained from peripheral blood collected in EDTA-tubes, after centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min. Plasma samples were stored at −80 °C until miRNA extraction. miRNAs were extracted from 400 µL of plasma using the miRVANA PARIS kit (Thermofisher, Monza, Italy). The 24 selected miRNAs were then spotted in array custom plates. For the selection of housekeeping (HSK) miRNAs, results were analyzed by GeNorm software (v. 3.2) to evaluate the stablest miRNAs. Assays were run on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermofisher). The reactions were initiated at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. All reactions, including the no template controls, were run in duplicate. Data were analyzed using Expression suite software v1.1 (Thermofisher) according to the ΔΔCt method.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

The aim of this analysis was to examine the association between baseline circulating miRNA expression levels and PFS, OS and ORR in the ITACa case series and to evaluate their modification during CT + B therapy. The primary objective of the ITACa trial was PFS. Secondary efficacy endpoints were ORR and OS. PFS was calculated as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented evidence of PD (per investigator assessment), last tumor assessment or death in the absence of disease progression. Patients submitted to curative metastasectomy were censored at the time of surgery. OS was calculated as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause or last follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patients. The relationship between baseline miRNA expression and clinical pathological factors was evaluated using a nonparametric ranking statistic test (median test). The median value of variation in the case series (30%) was set as the cutoff point. Time-to-event data (PFS, OS) were described using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log rank test (significance level of 5%). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using nonparametric methods. Estimated HR and their 95% CI were calculated by the Cox regression model. The multivariate Cox regression model was used to select the most useful prognostic markers of all the miRNAs used (considered as continuous variables) adjusting for clinical pathological characteristics of patients statistically significant at univariate analysis. Circulating basal levels of miRNAs were dichotomized into “high” or “low” according to median values [41]. We also conducted landmark analyses to reduce possible confounding by time on treatment by assessing the impact of miRNA level change from baseline to first tumor evaluation (about 2 months of onset of the treatment protocol) of survival outcomes. Patients who were still alive and not lost to follow-up at the landmark time were divided into two categories, i.e., patients who had progressed and patients who had not progressed by that time. PFS and OS after the landmark time were computed using the Kaplan–Meier curves. Logistic regression models were used to assess OR and their 95% CI in order to evaluate the association between miRNA baseline levels and ORR (CR + PR). All p-values were based on two-sided testing, and statistical analyses were performed using SAS statistical software Version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

5. Conclusions

This study showed that circulating higher levels of hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-29b-3p and hsa-miR-155-5p at baseline are associated with a better prognosis in mCRC patients treated with B-based CT. Measuring these miRNAs before treatment could be helpful in selecting the patients who are more likely to benefit from the drug. The increase in circulating hsa-miR-155-5p after one month of treatment is associated with much shorter PFS and OS, suggesting that the determination of this miRNA during treatment could give important information for monitoring the drug response. These results should be confirmed and verified in an independent case series before being translated into the clinical setting.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/1/307/s1.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Veronica Zanoni for editorial assistance.

Author Contributions

Paola Ulivi conceived of and designed the experiments. Alessandro Passardi, Martina Valgiusti and Giovanni Luca Frassineti were responsible for data collection. Matteo Canale and Giorgia Marisi performed the experiments. Paola Ulivi and Emanuela Scarpi analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Dino Amadori and Daniele Calistri critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version for submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Bbevacizumab
CTchemotherapy
eNOSnitric oxide synthase
mCRCmetastatic colorectal cancer
miRNAmicroRNA
MMP2metalloproteinase-2
ORRobjective response rate
OSoverall survival
PFSprogression-free survival

References

  1. Hochster, H.S.; Hart, L.L.; Ramanathan, R.K.; Childs, B.H.; Hainsworth, J.D.; Cohn, A.L.; Wong, L.; Fehrenbacher, L.; Abubakr, Y.; Saif, M.W.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine Regimens with or without Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of the TREE Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 3523–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Saltz, L.B.; Clarke, S.; Diaz-Rubio, E.; Scheithauer, W.; Figer, A.; Wong, R.; Koski, S.; Lichinitser, M.; Yang, T.S.; Rivera, F.; et al. Bevacizumab in Combination with Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 2013–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hurwitz, H.; Fehrenbacher, L.; Novotny, W.; Cartwright, T.; Hainsworth, J.; Heim, W.; Berlin, J.; Baron, A.; Griffing, S.; Holmgren, E.; et al. Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 2335–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gonzalez-Vacarezza, N.; Alonso, I.; Arroyo, G.; Martinez, J.; De Andres, F.; LLerena, A.; Estevez-Carrizo, F. Predictive Biomarkers Candidates for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Bevacizumab-Containing Regimen. Drug Metab. Pers. Ther. 2016, 31, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marien, K.M.; Croons, V.; Martinet, W.; De Loof, H.; Ung, C.; Waelput, W.; Scherer, S.J.; Kockx, M.M.; De Meyer, G.R. Predictive Tissue Biomarkers for Bevacizumab-Containing Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Update. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2015, 15, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cidon, E.U.; Alonso, P.; Masters, B. Markers of Response to Antiangiogenic Therapies in Colorectal Cancer: Where are we Now and what should be Next? Clin. Med. Insights Oncol. 2016, 10, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Inamura, K.; Ishikawa, Y. MicroRNA in Lung Cancer: Novel Biomarkers and Potential Tools for Treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fish, J.E.; Santoro, M.M.; Morton, S.U.; Yu, S.; Yeh, R.F.; Wythe, J.D.; Ivey, K.N.; Bruneau, B.G.; Stainier, D.Y.; Srivastava, D. MiR-126 Regulates Angiogenic Signaling and Vascular Integrity. Dev. Cell. 2008, 15, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ota, T.; Doi, K.; Fujimoto, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Ogawa, M.; Matsuzaki, H.; Kuroki, M.; Miyamoto, S.; Shirasawa, S.; Tsunoda, T. KRAS Up-Regulates the Expression of miR-181a, miR-200c and miR-210 in a Three-Dimensional-Specific Manner in DLD-1 Colorectal Cancer Cells. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 2271–2275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Ma, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X. Downregulation of miR-195 Correlates with Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer. Med. Oncol. 2012, 29, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, C.J.; Stratmann, J.; Zhou, Z.G.; Sun, X.F. Suppression of microRNA-31 Increases Sensitivity to 5-FU at an Early Stage, and Affects Cell Migration and Invasion in HCT-116 Colon Cancer Cells. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kanaan, Z.; Rai, S.N.; Eichenberger, M.R.; Barnes, C.; Dworkin, A.M.; Weller, C.; Cohen, E.; Roberts, H.; Keskey, B.; Petras, R.E.; et al. Differential microRNA Expression Tracks Neoplastic Progression in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Colorectal Cancer. Hum. Mutat. 2012, 33, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hur, K.; Toiyama, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Balaguer, F.; Nagasaka, T.; Koike, J.; Hemmi, H.; Koi, M.; Boland, C.R.; Goel, A. MicroRNA-200c Modulates Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Human Colorectal Cancer Metastasis. Gut 2013, 62, 1315–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, K.; Liang, X.; Shen, K.; Sun, L.; Cui, D.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, J.; Ni, L.; Liu, J. miR-222 Modulates Multidrug Resistance in Human Colorectal Carcinoma by Down-Regulating ADAM-17. Exp. Cell Res. 2012, 318, 2168–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boisen, M.K.; Dehlendorff, C.; Linnemann, D.; Nielsen, B.S.; Larsen, J.S.; Osterlind, K.; Nielsen, S.E.; Tarpgaard, L.S.; Qvortrup, C.; Pfeiffer, P.; et al. Tissue microRNAs as Predictors of Outcome in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with First Line Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin with or without Bevacizumab. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Inamura, K. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of MicroRNAs in Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hayes, J.; Thygesen, H.; Gregory, W.; Westhead, D.R.; French, P.J.; Van Den Bent, M.J.; Lawler, S.E.; Short, S.C. A Validated microRNA Profile with Predictive Potential in Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Bevacizumab. Mol. Oncol. 2016, 10, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Joerger, M.; Baty, F.; Fruh, M.; Droege, C.; Stahel, R.A.; Betticher, D.C.; von Moos, R.; Ochsenbein, A.; Pless, M.; Gautschi, O.; et al. Circulating microRNA Profiling in Patients with Advanced Non-Squamous NSCLC Receiving bevacizumab/erlotinib Followed by Platinum-Based Chemotherapy at Progression (SAKK 19/05). Lung Cancer 2014, 85, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hansen, T.F.; Carlsen, A.L.; Heegaard, N.H.; Sorensen, F.B.; Jakobsen, A. Changes in Circulating microRNA-126 during Treatment with Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab Predicts Treatment Response in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Passardi, A.; Nanni, O.; Tassinari, D.; Turci, D.; Cavanna, L.; Fontana, A.; Ruscelli, S.; Mucciarini, C.; Lorusso, V.; Ragazzini, A.; et al. Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Added to Standard Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Results for First-Line Treatment from the ITACa Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fang, J.H.; Zhou, H.C.; Zeng, C.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, J.P.; Guan, X.Y.; Zhuang, S.M. MicroRNA-29b Suppresses Tumor Angiogenesis, Invasion, and Metastasis by Regulating Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Expression. Hepatology 2011, 54, 1729–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, H.; Guan, X.; Tu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Long, J.; Li, S.; Qi, C.; Xie, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y. MicroRNA-29b Attenuates Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastasis by Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 and PTEN. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.; Cai, B.; Shen, L.; Dong, Y.; Lu, Q.; Sun, S.; Liu, S.; Ma, S.; Ma, P.X.; Chen, J. MiRNA-29b Suppresses Tumor Growth through Simultaneously Inhibiting Angiogenesis and Tumorigenesis by Targeting Akt3. Cancer Lett. 2017, 397, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wong, P.F.; Jamal, J.; Tong, K.L.; Khor, E.S.; Yeap, C.E.; Jong, H.L.; Lee, S.T.; Mustafa, M.R.; Abubakar, S. Deregulation of hsa-miR-20b Expression in TNF-α-Induced Premature Senescence of Human Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Microvasc. Res. 2017, 114, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, D.; Wang, J.; Xiao, M.; Zhou, T.; Shi, X. Role of Mir-155 in Controlling HIF-1α Level and Promoting Endothelial Cell Maturation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pankratz, F.; Bemtgen, X.; Zeiser, R.; Leonhardt, F.; Kreuzaler, S.; Hilgendorf, I.; Smolka, C.; Helbing, T.; Hoefer, I.; Esser, J.S.; et al. MicroRNA-155 Exerts Cell-Specific Antiangiogenic but Proarteriogenic Effects during Adaptive Neovascularization. Circulation 2015, 131, 1575–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kong, W.; He, L.; Richards, E.J.; Challa, S.; Xu, C.X.; Permuth-Wey, J.; Lancaster, J.M.; Coppola, D.; Sellers, T.A.; Djeu, J.Y.; et al. Upregulation of miRNA-155 Promotes Tumour Angiogenesis by Targeting VHL and is Associated with Poor Prognosis and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Oncogene 2014, 33, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Robertson, E.D.; Wasylyk, C.; Ye, T.; Jung, A.C.; Wasylyk, B. The Oncogenic MicroRNA hsa-miR-155–5p Targets the Transcription Factor ELK3 and Links it to the Hypoxia Response. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wan, J.; Xia, L.; Xu, W.; Lu, N. Expression and Function of miR-155 in Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Meloni, M.; Marchetti, M.; Garner, K.; Littlejohns, B.; Sala-Newby, G.; Xenophontos, N.; Floris, I.; Suleiman, M.S.; Madeddu, P.; Caporali, A.; et al. Local Inhibition of microRNA-24 Improves Reparative Angiogenesis and Left Ventricle Remodeling and Function in Mice with Myocardial Infarction. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 1390–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Marisi, G.; Scarpi, E.; Passardi, A.; Nanni, O.; Ragazzini, A.; Valgiusti, M.; Casadei Gardini, A.; Neri, L.; Frassineti, G.; Amadori, D.; et al. Circulating VEGF and eNOS Variations as Predictors of Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Bevacizumab. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tejpar, S.; Stintzing, S.; Ciardiello, F.; Tabernero, J.; van Cutsem, E.; Beier, F.; Esser, R.; Lenz, H.J.; Heinemann, V. Prognostic and Predictive Relevance of Primary Tumor Location in Patients with RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Analyses of the CRYSTAL and FIRE-3 Trials. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sun, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Qiu, B.; Liu, K.; Dong, G. MicroRNA-335 Inhibits Invasion and Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer by Targeting ZEB2. Med. Oncol. 2014, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sun, D.; Han, S.; Liu, C.; Zhou, R.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Z.; Qu, J. Microrna-199a-5p Functions as a Tumor Suppressor Via Suppressing Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF) in Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016, 22, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, X.; Lei, S.; Long, J.; Liu, X.; Wu, Q. MicroRNA-199a-5p Inhibits Tumor Proliferation in Melanoma by Mediating HIF-1α. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 13, 5241–5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tsuno, S.; Wang, X.; Shomori, K.; Hasegawa, J.; Miura, N. Hsa-miR-520d Induces Hepatoma Cells to Form Normal Liver Tissues Via a Stemness-Mediated Process. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ulivi, P.; Scarpi, E.; Chiadini, E.; Marisi, G.; Valgiusti, M.; Capelli, L.; Casadei Gardini, A.; Monti, M.; Ruscelli, S.; Frassineti, G.L.; et al. Right- vs. Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Differences in Tumor Biology and Bevacizumab Efficacy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hong, L.; Han, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Nita, A. Angiogenesis-Related microRNAs in Colon Cancer. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2013, 13, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Muhammad, S.; Kaur, K.; Huang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Kaur, P.; Yazdani, H.O.; Bilal, M.U.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, L.; Wang, X.S. MicroRNAs in Colorectal Cancer: Role in Metastasis and Clinical Perspectives. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 17011–17019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gallach, S.; Calabuig-Farinas, S.; Jantus-Lewintre, E.; Camps, C. MicroRNAs: Promising New Antiangiogenic Targets in Cancer. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 878450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Altman, D.G.; McShane, L.M.; Sauerbrei, W.; Taube, S.E. Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med. 2012, 9, e1001216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 00307 g001 550
Figure 1. PFS and OS of basal circulating levels of hsa-miR-20b-5p (a,b), hsa-miR-29b-5p (c,d) and hsa-miR-155-5p (e,f). Dashed lines represent patients with miRNA values greater than the median value, whereas continuous lines represent patients with miRNA values lower than the median value.
Figure 1. PFS and OS of basal circulating levels of hsa-miR-20b-5p (a,b), hsa-miR-29b-5p (c,d) and hsa-miR-155-5p (e,f). Dashed lines represent patients with miRNA values greater than the median value, whereas continuous lines represent patients with miRNA values lower than the median value.
Ijms 19 00307 g001
Ijms 19 00307 g002 550
Figure 2. PFS (a) and OS (b) of patients with an increase ≥ or <30% of circulating hsa-miR-155-5p at the first clinical evaluation. Dashed lines represent patients with miRNA values greater than the median value, whereas continuous lines represent patients with miRNA values lower than the median value.
Figure 2. PFS (a) and OS (b) of patients with an increase ≥ or <30% of circulating hsa-miR-155-5p at the first clinical evaluation. Dashed lines represent patients with miRNA values greater than the median value, whereas continuous lines represent patients with miRNA values lower than the median value.
Ijms 19 00307 g002
Table
Table 1. Patient characteristics (n = 52).
Table 1. Patient characteristics (n = 52).
Patient CharacteristicsNo. (%)
Median age, years (range) 65 (37–83)
Gender
Male35 (67.3)
Female17 (32.7)
Performance Status (ECOG)
044 (84.6)
1–28 (15.4)
Stage at Diagnosis
I–III12 (23.1)
IV40 (76.9)
Tumor Localization
Colon37 (71.1)
Rectum15 (28.9)
Left-sided27 (55.1)
Right-sided22 (44.9)
Grading
1–225 (59.5)
317 (40.5)
Missing10 (19.0)
CT Regimen
FOLFOX427 (51.9)
FOLFIRI25 (48.1)
Prior Cancer Therapy
Surgery40 (76.9)
Radiotherapy4 (7.7)
Adjuvant CT9 (17.3)
RAS Status
Wild type27 (51.9)
Mutated25 (48.1)
BRAF Status
Wild type46 (88.5)
Mutated6 (11.5)
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CT: chemotherapy; FOLFOX4, folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin; FOLFIRI, folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan.
Table
Table 2. miRNAs significantly correlated with tumor localization.
Table 2. miRNAs significantly correlated with tumor localization.
miRNALeft-SidedRight-Sidedp
Median Value (Range)
hsa-miR-199a-5p3188 (0.5–149,395)1960.5 (0.47–48,761)0.034
hsa-miR-335-5p6574.5 (1493–1,332,286)3214 (2.14–40,038)0.006
hsa-miR-520d-3p5087 (3.09–2,831,724)1505 (0.49–48,452)0.008
Table
Table 3. miRNAs significantly correlated with RAS status.
Table 3. miRNAs significantly correlated with RAS status.
miRNAKRASpNRASp
Median Value (Range)Median Value (Range)
Wild TypeMutatedWild TypeMutated
hsa-miR-21-5p1424 (0.57–4627)1.71 (0.53–3594)0.0191558 (0.57–4627)1011 (0.53–3594)0.008
hsa-miR-221-3p1163 (0.03–5499)1878 (0.58–34,375)0.0501122 (0.03–5499)1866 (0.58–34,375)0.010
Table
Table 4. Multivariate analysis of PFS and OS.
Table 4. Multivariate analysis of PFS and OS.
BaselinePFSOS
HR (95% CI)pHR (95% CI)p
has-miR-20b-5p0.922 (0.847–0.989)0.0350.930 (0.850–0.995)0.046
has-miR-29b-3p0.854 (0.728–0.997)0.0450.872 (0.753–0.991)0.039
has-miR-424-5p0.968 (0.877–1.069)0.5170.936 (0.838–1.046)0.242
has-miR-155-5p0.927 (0.863–0.997)0.0400.917 (0.850–0.990)0.026
ECOG PS (1–2 vs. 0)1.206 (0.424–3.433)0.7251.838 (0.667–5.060)0.239
BRAF (mutated vs. wild type)3.574 (1.075–11.882)0.0383.628 (1.063–12.378)0.040
Age, years (≥65 vs. <65)2.207 (0.987–4.935)0.0541.478 (0.650–3.364)0.351
Table
Table 5. Univariate analysis of PFS and OS in relation to miRNA cutoff values.
Table 5. Univariate analysis of PFS and OS in relation to miRNA cutoff values.
PFSNo. PatientsNo. EventsMedian PFS (Months) (95% CI)pHR (95% CI)p
hsa-miR-20b-5p
<129326248.1 (5.0–12.5) 1.00
≥1293262014.0 (9.4–21.3)0.0080.44 (0.24–0.82)0.010
hsa-miR-29b-3p
<313825238.2 (5.0–12.4) 1.00
≥3138272114.9 (9.1–21.3)0.0210.50 (0.27–0.91)0.024
hsa-miR-155-5p
<0.7332308.3 (6.1–9.7) 1.00
≥0.73201416.0 (10.2–23.0)0.0070.42 (0.22–0.81)0.009
OSNo. PatientsNo. EventsMedian OS (Months) (95% CI)pHR (95% CI)p
hsa-miR-20b-5p
<1293262311.6 (8.2–23.4) 1.00
≥1293261728.8 (19.3–42.9)0.0040.40 (0.21–0.77)0.005
hsa-miR-29b-3p
<3138252215.5 (6.8–24.8) 1.00
≥3138271831.7 (13.9–47.1)0.0050.40 (0.21–0.78)0.007
hsa-miR-155-5p
<0.73322713.5 (8.2–23.4) 1.00
≥0.73201331.6 (21.8–42.9)0.0240.47 (0.24–0.92)0.028

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ulivi, P.; Canale, M.; Passardi, A.; Marisi, G.; Valgiusti, M.; Frassineti, G.L.; Calistri, D.; Amadori, D.; Scarpi, E. Circulating Plasma Levels of miR-20b, miR-29b and miR-155 as Predictors of Bevacizumab Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010307

AMA Style

Ulivi P, Canale M, Passardi A, Marisi G, Valgiusti M, Frassineti GL, Calistri D, Amadori D, Scarpi E. Circulating Plasma Levels of miR-20b, miR-29b and miR-155 as Predictors of Bevacizumab Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(1):307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010307

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ulivi, Paola, Matteo Canale, Alessandro Passardi, Giorgia Marisi, Martina Valgiusti, Giovanni Luca Frassineti, Daniele Calistri, Dino Amadori, and Emanuela Scarpi. 2018. "Circulating Plasma Levels of miR-20b, miR-29b and miR-155 as Predictors of Bevacizumab Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 1: 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010307

APA Style

Ulivi, P., Canale, M., Passardi, A., Marisi, G., Valgiusti, M., Frassineti, G. L., Calistri, D., Amadori, D., & Scarpi, E. (2018). Circulating Plasma Levels of miR-20b, miR-29b and miR-155 as Predictors of Bevacizumab Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(1), 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010307

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop